The Etymology of Chivalry

While on the Dr. Phil program, a woman accused me of being chivalrous. Now I’m never one to argue with a woman. For example, if a woman wants to get smacked around by her boyfriend every time she runs her mouth, then who am I to say it’s wrong? This isn’t some fascist dystopia. Women have the choice to get their asses kicked if that’s what they want. They also have the choice to not ask for a raise because they’re cowards and then blame the wage gap on sexism.

In a free world, women have the choice to be retarded.

For the record, I have never hit a woman unless it was hilarious.

As a man, when I’m accused of something, I think about what that something is before running my mouth in defense. Call a woman a whore and she’ll start screaming like a fire alarm. Good luck shutting her up because a woman’s 9-Volt battery is harder to find than her G-Spot.

The G-Spot is not a myth. It drives women insane with pleasure and lust and it’s easy it’s find. It’s right where you sign the check. X marks the spot.

Since a woman accused me of being it, I chose to define “chivalry” in terms that a woman could understand before I asked myself if I was. My manclusion is that I indeed am because “chivalry” is impossible to escape in a free world — where women choose to be as retarded as inbred monkeys.

Opening Doors

When left on their own, women walk into doors a hundred times more often than men.

Off the top of my head I can think of six women who I have seen walk into doors. None of them were under any kind of influence; although one was in Paris so she might have been overcome by the scent of arrogance and expensive perfume. The French call that Le Sex Panther. Nor were any of them blind.

I have only seen one man walk into a door and not only was he so drunk that he didn’t remember it the next day, but I pushed him into the door.

There’s a reason sex toys don’t come with a purple magic marker you can use to decorate them like a bruised peach before using. That same reason is why it became customary for men to open the doors for women. Men don’t like our sex toys looking like dinged up trash.

Women can’t open anything correctly. Doors, potato chips, or their legs. “Lesbian” sex is brought to you by cheap Merlot and the letters G, H, and B.

Pulling out Chairs

They say it’s chivalrous to pull out a chair for a woman. Well it is, but only in the same way that it’s chivalrous to get your girlfriend’s email password so you can make sure she isn’t signed up to any dating websites. She probably is and you need to get on that. Grown women need more protection on the internet than children.

It isn’t polite for a woman to whisper to her friends while you’re around, so why is it polite for her to have an unknown email password? It’s the same thing. Women don’t “window shop” for something they don’t want to buy.

Paying for Things

Women have never had money, continue to have no money, and never will have any money.

The only reason women can “own” property in this day and age is because you can’t “own” property in this day and age. You just rent it. If you don’t agree with that, go a year without paying your property tax and send me an apology from the Y. Then send your landlord, the government, the backrent.

Women have no understanding of money. They’re like scavenging rats with it and they always will be. Rats can’t reach the counter top or open the fridge and prostitution is illegal. So is selling babies. How else would a rat or a woman get any money?

If you’re up for a fiscal gas, ask a woman why it’s a bad time to get married and buy a house. Better yet, ask a female Realtor. Her poor little brain might have a meltdown. A subprime meltdown.

And of course not going out of your way to blow a woman’s mind is the definition of chivalry. Not going out of your way to make a woman look foolish for things she is biologically incapable of doing: opening doors, paying for things, sitting down and not fucking anything with a pulse; is something women value.

“Game” is a myth. Persistence, alcohol, and making sure your woman isn’t running into any doors has worked since the beginning of time.

No women allowed.

Related Articles:

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

RSS feed | Trackback URI

73 Comments in 63 threads.»

Comment by Dick Masterson
2009-10-25 15:37:51 - IP Man-Hash: 237473d762590

I am shutting this site down.

 
Comment by SomethingCheezy
2009-05-26 18:03:13 - IP Man-Hash: 4abe63948ea04

I may be mistaken, but you may have made one of the rare mistakes us men make (roughly once a year), in your paragraph talking of a woman’s G-spot, you said – “it’s hard it’s find” when, in my opinion I thought you may have attempted to say “it’s hard to* find”.

Comment by SomethingCheezy
2009-05-26 18:14:36 - IP Man-Hash: 4abe63948ea04

“it’s easy it’s find”

 
 
Comment by Bob
2008-12-12 16:02:10 - IP Man-Hash: a73a45f9b321b

“For the record, I have never hit a woman unless it was hilarious.”

Win.

Comment by Jon P
2009-06-08 21:04:35 - IP Man-Hash: a212a405bd8d0

HAH, that was Win

 
 
Comment by Bitchy
2008-07-26 14:31:30 - IP Man-Hash: 8a37b6454e781

Dating website? Hell when you go out at least 500 men are ready. But that’s not my point, hey maybe if you can actually understand a rational concept perhaps mine will help.

Comment by Banderman
2009-08-29 15:58:20 - IP Man-Hash: bd4f7d0a3a68e

Perfect username. Couldn’t get any better. Right on the money. Not an admirable trait.

 
Comment by Absintheminded
2009-10-04 15:16:54 - IP Man-Hash: f3dbfbf21b4d6

Speaking of rational, what was your point?

 
 
Comment by bola
2008-06-24 15:19:31 - IP Man-Hash: a28a8fa6fa63a

Reformed mr. nice guy said:

Tom said:

“i’d never hit a woman unless it was hilarious”

You see that … that is why you can’t get laid. And unless you post a picture proving it, only retards and rednecks will believe you.

ugh, please just leave right now before you get embarrassed……you have no valid reasoning….

Tom’s already left. He wisely decided to bow out after being bitch-slapped left, right and center.

 
Comment by Reformed mr. nice guy
2008-06-24 14:47:59 - IP Man-Hash: ac5e782dab2ad

Tom said:

“i’d never hit a woman unless it was hilarious”

You see that … that is why you can’t get laid. And unless you post a picture proving it, only retards and rednecks will believe you.

ugh, please just leave right now before you get embarrassed……you have no valid reasoning….

KAT said:

Dick Masterson said:

UraTw@ said:

Aw can’t ickle wickle pathetic Dick (what an appropriate name) cope with strong, independent, EQUAL women? Clearly not.

I feel punching you would be VERY funny. And satisfying.

That’s called a threat.

-Dick

So what are you gonna do about it she hasn’t actually hit you genius you have no case

As well as you, people that say stuff like that are the ones that talk before they think( not that im calling you one of them). Women in general do it all the time, perfect example is the fat bitch that was on the Dr. Phil show trying to start shit, before thinking, with dick. Its stupid to assume something like that (and try to argue) with so little….what you said gives the implication of you assuming he would bring a “threat” into some kind of “case”. Where what dick said just pointed out something that bitch more then likely didn’t know(assumption!), or stating the obvious because its funny on occasion.

p.s…..i don’t want to argue, just trying to help you out. This is but a simple statement so i expect no response ……and if YOU do,(want to argue) i will when you have a good point or two…….well maybe just one, two seems way to hard for you.(< assumption based on very little!!!!!) see how ignorant it makes you sound when you say stuff like that? although there are exceptions to funny assumptions.

I respect all the things dick talks about because the evidence is easily seen everywhere around you, even vicariously through all the people here. seeing it all makes it hard to not believe a lot of the stuff he says with soo many validated points.

 
Comment by Muzalon
2008-06-13 23:38:27 - IP Man-Hash: 7da606c085fc9

Tom said:

“i’d never hit a woman unless it was hilarious”

You see that … that is why you can’t get laid. And unless you post a picture proving it, only retards and rednecks will believe you.

It’s our resident pussy-whipped Anglo-cock…

Comment by Banderman
2009-08-29 16:00:39 - IP Man-Hash: bd4f7d0a3a68e

I bet Dick gets more pussy than a toilet seat. Shut the hell up, if that is the best attack mode one can come up with, go back to the drawing board. Calling someone a virgin, gay, or accusing them of not getting laid on a regular basis is so predictable and overused it’s almost comical, but most certainly the musings of a wind bag.

 
 
Comment by Dustin
2008-06-13 21:54:29 - IP Man-Hash: 43fafadb17f45

UraTw@ said:

“Aw can’t ickle wickle pathetic Dick (what an appropriate name) cope with strong, independent, EQUAL women? Clearly not.

I feel punching you would be VERY funny. And satisfying.”

We’re men. we like to scientifically prove or disprove things. This requires an experiment, or 100. Whether or not Dick can ‘handle’ such a woman would require that we find one, and put them in the same room together.

Point being; no one has spotted a test subject yet.

Women love to call themselves strong, independent, and EQUAL; but that doesn’t make it so. Behind every ’strong, independent, and EQUAL’ woman, you’ll find alimony, child support, welfare… Some form of mass extortion that she did not earn and sold/is selling her body to get.

 
Comment by KAT
2008-05-23 20:43:28 - IP Man-Hash: 05ea0c3b7da6a

Dick Masterson said:

UraTw@ said:

Aw can’t ickle wickle pathetic Dick (what an appropriate name) cope with strong, independent, EQUAL women? Clearly not.

I feel punching you would be VERY funny. And satisfying.

That’s called a threat.

-Dick

So what are you gonna do about it she hasn’t actually hit you genius you have no case

Comment by Banderman
2009-08-29 16:03:30 - IP Man-Hash: bd4f7d0a3a68e

“So what are you gonna do about it she hasn’t actually hit you genius you have no case’. Huh? Another child with Internet access. Obviously not a legal scholar. For the record, making threats, veiled or direct, by bodily harm over the Internet, is a Federal crime, genius.

 
 
Comment by Tom
2008-04-23 09:14:53 - IP Man-Hash: 7df871ec47ee7

“i’d never hit a woman unless it was hilarious”

You see that … that is why you can’t get laid. And unless you post a picture proving it, only retards and rednecks will believe you.

 
Comment by Dutch269
2008-03-04 16:37:14 - IP Man-Hash: 6d2bcc78aa95d

UraTw@ said:

Aw can’t ickle wickle pathetic Dick (what an appropriate name) cope with strong, independent, EQUAL women? Clearly not.

I feel punching you would be VERY funny. And satisfying.

I would like to add, that this female thinks being strong and independent, means being a bitch. This is very common among western females.

From everything I have read and experianced, western women simply do not understand what being strong and independent is.

The first step is self-responsibility, and the ability to say; “It’s my fault my life is screwed up, and I’m going to fix it”

Never heard a female say that, not in real life, not on TV or in movies. This is something completly alien to western females. Until that changes, we will see a lot of crying, angry women like this one. Pathetic……

 
Comment by Hilary
2008-03-04 15:54:21 - IP Man-Hash: e24370fe2bb3c

UraTw@ said:

FUCK YOU

I truly wish people like you would stop responding, you prove their point. Geez, I can already see what response will be said to this.

 
Comment by indian
2008-03-04 01:46:05 - IP Man-Hash: 72405b4b670ab

UraTw@ said:

Aw can’t ickle wickle pathetic Dick (what an appropriate name) cope with strong, independent, EQUAL women? Clearly not.

I feel punching you would be VERY funny. And satisfying.

You r not an equal and will never be.GO CRY TO UR MOM

 
Comment by Dick Masterson
2008-03-03 15:16:35 - IP Man-Hash: 05bd330037e10

UraTw@ said:

Aw can’t ickle wickle pathetic Dick (what an appropriate name) cope with strong, independent, EQUAL women? Clearly not.

I feel punching you would be VERY funny. And satisfying.

That’s called a threat.

-Dick

 
Comment by Noel
2008-03-03 14:49:07 - IP Man-Hash: 68d4f94bfae30

UraTw@ said:

Aw can’t ickle wickle pathetic Dick (what an appropriate name) cope with strong, independent, EQUAL women? Clearly not.

I feel punching you would be VERY funny. And satisfying.

Seeing you try to punch a man would be hilarious, really, truly funny, because I assure you even a short skinny guy would just take it and laugh out loud, I’ve seen cunts try and punch, they can’t even make a fist, they put the thumb in front, and they arch the arm, or simply try to do a hammer-like motion up-to-down. A real punch uses all your weight, and absorbs all impact (so no bones break) through the arm. Try it girly, I volunteer to take your sissy-punch, and you won’t feel any satisfaction when I shrug it off and return it in real man-style, and then you’ll do the cunt-style, cry rape abuse or whatever and hope a would be hero comes and saves you for the default unspoken promise of pussy from a damsel in distress.

 
Comment by Mr.Lomax
2008-03-03 13:15:39 - IP Man-Hash: 2e156e431b91f

*Can you show a bit of respect for another human being that just so happens to have a different opinion to yours.*
I have no explanation for that hideous mistake.

 
Comment by Mr.Lomax
2008-03-03 13:13:52 - IP Man-Hash: 2e156e431b91f

“Aw can’t ickle wickle pathetic Dick (what an appropriate name) cope with strong, independent, EQUAL women? Clearly not.

I feel punching you would be VERY funny. And satisfying.”

Resorting to pathetic (not appropriate) name calling doesn’t sound very ’strong’, ‘independent’ or ‘equal’ to me. It just shows how weak you really are, so weak that you have to take a rather pathetic stab at ones ego.

Can you show a bit of respect for another human being that just so happens to have an opinion than yourself. This may cost me man points but I don’t give a fuck, I respect you and your opinion, which is why I’m not giving anything differing from constructive criticism, can you show me that you can take it like a respectable human being?

 
Comment by Arbalest
2008-03-03 13:11:27 - IP Man-Hash: 74d25c292c6b8

UraTw@ said:

FUCK YOU

Geez, she just got here and she’s already offering sex. So much for the women aren’t whores excuse. and straight to the small dick jokes. Amazingly childish.

 
Comment by UraTw@
2008-03-03 13:03:00 - IP Man-Hash: ca853ead68d76

Aw can’t ickle wickle pathetic Dick (what an appropriate name) cope with strong, independent, EQUAL women? Clearly not.

I feel punching you would be VERY funny. And satisfying.

Comment by Bob
2008-12-12 16:09:09 - IP Man-Hash: a73a45f9b321b

It would be VERY funny to watch you try. It would probably be even more funny when you get your jaw broke trying. But the funniest part of all would be hearing you trying to explain why, as a “strong”,”independent”,”EQUAL” woman, you got beat like a little circus monkey and sent home to cry to daddy.

 
Comment by Chris
2008-12-12 18:39:04 - IP Man-Hash: cfb61523380ca

@UraTwAT

Strong, independent, “EQUAL” whimmin?

STRONG? — As long as you can handle a man who’s STRONGER when you punch him. Can ya bitch?

INDEPENDENT?? — We ENCOURAGE independence in you cunts. In fact we want you to be so independent that you fuck off this website – but you can’t even do THAT

EQUAL??? – OK…. I can’t stop laughing.

Menarebetterthanwomen.

 
Comment by Absintheminded
2009-10-04 15:19:44 - IP Man-Hash: f3dbfbf21b4d6

When did standing up for yourself in an immature manner become consider strong or indepedent?

Comment by Chris
2009-10-04 17:35:20 - IP Man-Hash: 0211d7d96e1c0

Why are you pretending to know what any measure of maturity is??? Women believe they get to behave like cunts and still think they “deserve a prince” and/or life partner who’s willing to put up with that shit.

Women freak out when you forget their silly birthday, when all the hooker did from one year to the next is NOT DIE.

You cunts don’t get to speak about “maturity” with any authority whatsoever.

 
 
 
Comment by UraTw@
2008-03-03 13:01:50 - IP Man-Hash: ca853ead68d76

FUCK YOU

 
Comment by Panda
2008-03-03 06:24:44 - IP Man-Hash: f56549d00273a

I’m not at all surprised that America’s hat got First prize at the bad-woman fair. I think that this list should include Argentina (from personal experience) and Israel (from things I have heard, including herr’s comment). This man-list should be printed and laminated for a reference for all men, of what breeds of woman to avoid.

 
Comment by MansVoice
2008-03-02 05:00:30 - IP Man-Hash: 1815ed580b7ab

Ghenghis Khan was manly as fuck.

 
Comment by dazedandconfused
2008-03-02 02:27:14 - IP Man-Hash: 31a4b0bdcc391

Is there anything worse than someone that’s been here for 5 minutes whinging about a blogger that hasn’t updated his site, likely with good man-reason?

*D3C*

 
Comment by Cam
2008-03-01 11:14:02 - IP Man-Hash: 35ea733b17e58

Is there anything worse than a blogger who doesn’t update his site?

 
Comment by TruthSayer
2008-02-29 17:09:13 - IP Man-Hash: f78d821cb12a8

Geeza said:

Of course we’ve been able to evolve by successfully being able to reproduce but we arent a bunch of mindless male monkeys trying to fight to be the head of a monkey tribe anymore.

True.

We are mindful male humans trying to fight to be the head of our human tribes. Evolutionary strategies still apply. Men still do everything we do with the ultimate goal of sex/reproduction. Some of us are even consciously aware of that fact.

Geeza said:

If he did it all for the nookie, then he is a moron and so is anyone else who walks into a bear trap at the whiff of a pussy. I think we’ve seen enough guys have their dicks clamped in one to know where mindless pussy chasing gets us.

Fred Durst is a moron, without question.

Unfortunately, too many men don’t figure out where their (innate) mindless pussy chasing gets them until it’s too late. It’s still a fact that we’re all chasing pussy, with or without our minds. The key is to stop denying human nature and learn to exploit it instead.

 
Comment by Geeza
2008-02-29 14:57:22 - IP Man-Hash: 0abd487f9c3c5

TruthSayer said:

Or, as it was more succinctly put by Fred Durst…

“I did it all for the nookie”.

Of course we’ve been able to evolve by successfully being able to reproduce but we arent a bunch of mindless male monkeys trying to fight to be the head of a monkey tribe anymore.

If he did it all for the nookie, then he is a moron and so is anyone else who walks into a bear trap at the whiff of a pussy. I think we’ve seen enough guys have their dicks clamped in one to know where mindless pussy chasing gets us.

 
Comment by TruthSayer
2008-02-28 18:40:27 - IP Man-Hash: bf1f8818f8ec7

Genghis said:

PETER SUREWOOD. said:

Sex is just a commodity. Spend your time and energy on making money, starting a business, or travel…

Why do we bother making money, starting businesses, traveling? As far as I can see it’s to get laid. Why not just kick back, grab a beer, go to sleep in the sun? What’ll I do today… go fishing, or build a fucking pyramid? Well, fishing all day doesn’t get a man a lot of pussy, but pyramids… I like to hang out at the beach and surf. So why don’t I do it all day? Why do I go to work instead, stay up all night and invent shit? Only one reason when it comes down to it. Gotta get laid. A woman just lies down and spreads her legs, she gets laid all she wants, and then some. Me, I’ve got to build a bloody pyramid. That’s why men are better than women, but it’s also why men are enslaved by women. This whole bloody civilization of ours was built by men who needed to get laid. What motivates men? Pussy, pussy, and more pussy. Why the fuck would it surprise anyone that a man with the drive to get to the White House screwed a few interns? Seems to me this is a pretty simple equation. The Indo’s say “no money, no honey”. The best way to get a few bucks, and a bit of pussy, is to conquer the world. Just ask Genghis Khan, the direct ancestor of 8-1/2% of all Chinese. Plenty of honey there, I reckon.

Just my two cent’s worth….

I agree, Genghis.

An excerpt from “The Red Queen – Sex and the Evolution of Human Nature” by Matt Ridley…

“Why sex? Surely there are features of human nature other than this one overexposed and troublesome procreative pastime. True enough, but reproduction is the sole goal for which human beings are designed; everything else is a means to that end. Human beings inherit tendencies to survive, to eat, to think, to speak, and so on. But above all they inherit a tendency to reproduce. Those of their predecessors that reproduced passed on their characteristics to their offspring; those that remained barren did not. Therefore, anything that increased the chances of a person reproducing successfully was passed on at the expense of anything else. We can confidently assert that there is nothing in our natures that was not carefully “chosen” in this way for its ability to contribute to eventual reproductive success.”

Or, as it was more succinctly put by Fred Durst…

“I did it all for the nookie”.

 
Comment by Billy
2008-02-28 14:12:43 - IP Man-Hash: 67caec8fb3425

Women don’t want love and companionship.. That is a myth.
They want what the next woman has..
Never satified

 
Comment by Dutch269
2008-02-28 09:21:48 - IP Man-Hash: 6d2bcc78aa95d

I would even go as far to say that the majority of men over 30 realize sex based relationships are the lose.

The idea of all men just out for sex and cruising the singles bar each night is a myth, a hollywood fable. Sure they exist, but in small numbers.

Men want the same kind of love and companionship that women want, we want trust and compasion just like any women.

 
Comment by no manhole
2008-02-27 16:37:39 - IP Man-Hash: 0a074b6031993

Geeza said:

Hmm. After alot of thought I’m still undecided. I dont think that a man is solely motivated by sex although it is a very strong driving force.

Maybe thats just me.

I second that. Intellectual stimulation from having an interesting job is most of my life, plus learning about other things (books, reading): more intellectual stimulation.

Being a great citizen is important to me, as much as I can be.

Women are entertaining and sex is wonderful, but the pluses of women are becoming less worth the emotional and finacial overhead you have to deal with, at least for me.

 
Comment by Geeza
2008-02-27 15:38:01 - IP Man-Hash: 8c37d92ca0ba0

Genghis said:

Why do we bother making money, starting businesses, traveling? As far as I can see it’s to get laid. Why not just kick back, grab a beer, go to sleep in the sun? What’ll I do today… go fishing, or build a fucking pyramid? Well, fishing all day doesn’t get a man a lot of pussy, but pyramids… I like to hang out at the beach and surf. So why don’t I do it all day? Why do I go to work instead, stay up all night and invent shit? Only one reason when it comes down to it. Gotta get laid. A woman just lies down and spreads her legs, she gets laid all she wants, and then some. Me, I’ve got to build a bloody pyramid. That’s why men are better than women, but it’s also why men are enslaved by women. This whole bloody civilization of ours was built by men who needed to get laid. What motivates men? Pussy, pussy, and more pussy. Why the fuck would it surprise anyone that a man with the drive to get to the White House screwed a few interns? Seems to me this is a pretty simple equation. The Indo’s say “no money, no honey”. The best way to get a few bucks, and a bit of pussy, is to conquer the world. Just ask Genghis Khan, the direct ancestor of 8-1/2% of all Chinese. Plenty of honey there, I reckon.

Just my two cent’s worth….

Hmm. After alot of thought I’m still undecided. I dont think that a man is solely motivated by sex although it is a very strong driving force.

Apart from having a desire to fuck women we are adventurous, competitive, protective, self sacrificing and we like to fight our little battles, win our little victories and build our own little empires and castles even its just limited to a 2 bed apartment and a family. Fucking women is a means to that end. Not the end itself.

As far as drinking beer, laying in the sun and fishing is concerned I can only enjoy doing those things if I feel I’ve put in the effort to justify it. Personally I dont think I could stand living in a permanent episode of Huckleberry Finn.

Maybe thats just me.

 
Comment by Dutch269
2008-02-27 15:26:04 - IP Man-Hash: 6d2bcc78aa95d

Thanks for the insites Loliko, my son has talked about going to Canada, because he loves the colder climates.

I have tried to explain the situation there, perhaps your post will shed more light on his brain..hehe

Peace~

 
Comment by Loliko
2008-02-27 15:07:17 - IP Man-Hash: 6bbd0c662f8a9

Go away, Maria. At least back up your argument. I’ve read lot on this side and I must say, it’s hard to find holes to poke. You have two between your legs, so I suggest you try poking those. Oh yeah, cross your fingers — you’ll like it more ;D

Commander Scott said:
1. Canada

Aside from being female I also happen to be Canadian… and I must agree. Allow me to present a few arguments:

- Multiculturalism
On first glance this “multiculturalism” thing seems to be a good thing, as you get access to women of other cultures. This is not the case, especially with immigrants. Immigrants stick to themselves and rarely venture outside their own culture, which they’ve brought with them from home. So, you’ve had your eye on some cute Asian girl? Unless your skin is yellowish, your eyes are brown, and your hair is some weird shade of brownish-orange, you’ll never get the Asian girl. The ones you can get, however, are the ones born in the country… and those girls are about as Asian as you are.

- Homosexuality
I believe same-sex marriage is pretty much legal throughout Canada; I haven’t followed this story, so forgive me for not being able to give provide solid facts. But yes, there are lots of lesbians in Canada, many of whom flock to Canada to get married, if anything. Vancouver is fast-becoming the San Francisco of Canada, with the added bonus of having a booming drug trade as well.

- Unhinged freedom of expression
Lots of feminists and social activists here. Have fun eating tofu burgers during your stay!

- We’re Canada (north of USA)!!
Canada defines itself through comparison with USA. We can’t escape it, since we share so much land with them. We gorge themselves on their media, cross the border to fill up on their gas, and visit their malls to buy their stuff. We watch their TV. In summary, we have all the problems you guys have finding women, in addition to everything mentioned above.

 
Comment by maria
2008-02-27 11:25:50 - IP Man-Hash: 28a2f2e858f80

you are an IDIOT!

 
Comment by Herr
2008-02-27 04:17:30 - IP Man-Hash: 7462d2e25f45e

Commander Scott said:

After examining a number of sites on the internet and reviewing the testimonies of various male travellers, I have finally managed to compile a list of the worst places to meet women for relationships, marriage or even something as brief as a few minutes of coitus.
Interestingly enough, the United States is not the worst place on earth to meet women. That special honour is reserved for Canada, the worst place in the world to meet anyone or anything. It is, by far, a region of the world traditionally characterized by a glacial social atmosphere almost as cold as its Arctic winters. The second worst place to meet females in their natural habitat, would definitely have to be Australia, whose women are famous for their staunch adherence to puritanical Victorian morals and materialistic frame of mind.
With nothing further ado, I present to you, in numerical order, a list of the world’s worst places to meet women:

1. Canada
2. Australia
3. United States
4. Great Britain
5. New Zealand
6. France
7. Germany
8. Italy
9. Netherlands
10. Norway
11. Denmark
12. Sweden
13. Spain
14. Portugal

Feel free to add and subtract from this list at will.

You forgot Israel. Israel has to be one of the worst places to find a woman. Or any peace and quiet for that matter.

 
Comment by Commander Scott
2008-02-26 17:35:39 - IP Man-Hash: 24aaaa9e1c0e2

Genghis said:

PETER SUREWOOD. said:

Sex is just a commodity. Spend your time and energy on making money, starting a business, or travel…

Why do we bother making money, starting businesses, traveling? As far as I can see it’s to get laid. Why not just kick back, grab a beer, go to sleep in the sun? What’ll I do today… go fishing, or build a fucking pyramid? Well, fishing all day doesn’t get a man a lot of pussy, but pyramids… I like to hang out at the beach and surf. So why don’t I do it all day? Why do I go to work instead, stay up all night and invent shit? Only one reason when it comes down to it. Gotta get laid. A woman just lies down and spreads her legs, she gets laid all she wants, and then some. Me, I’ve got to build a bloody pyramid. That’s why men are better than women, but it’s also why men are enslaved by women. This whole bloody civilization of ours was built by men who needed to get laid. What motivates men? Pussy, pussy, and more pussy. Why the fuck would it surprise anyone that a man with the drive to get to the White House screwed a few interns? Seems to me this is a pretty simple equation. The Indo’s say “no money, no honey”. The best way to get a few bucks, and a bit of pussy, is to conquer the world. Just ask Genghis Khan, the direct ancestor of 8-1/2% of all Chinese. Plenty of honey there, I reckon.

Just my two cent’s worth….

Your insight into one of the central aspects of male sexuality is excellent. I, for one, second your opinion. Welcome aboard, Genghis.

 
Comment by Genghis
2008-02-26 15:58:56 - IP Man-Hash: 5ad14c9a8ccb9

PETER SUREWOOD. said:

Sex is just a commodity. Spend your time and energy on making money, starting a business, or travel…

Why do we bother making money, starting businesses, traveling? As far as I can see it’s to get laid. Why not just kick back, grab a beer, go to sleep in the sun? What’ll I do today… go fishing, or build a fucking pyramid? Well, fishing all day doesn’t get a man a lot of pussy, but pyramids… I like to hang out at the beach and surf. So why don’t I do it all day? Why do I go to work instead, stay up all night and invent shit? Only one reason when it comes down to it. Gotta get laid. A woman just lies down and spreads her legs, she gets laid all she wants, and then some. Me, I’ve got to build a bloody pyramid. That’s why men are better than women, but it’s also why men are enslaved by women. This whole bloody civilization of ours was built by men who needed to get laid. What motivates men? Pussy, pussy, and more pussy. Why the fuck would it surprise anyone that a man with the drive to get to the White House screwed a few interns? Seems to me this is a pretty simple equation. The Indo’s say “no money, no honey”. The best way to get a few bucks, and a bit of pussy, is to conquer the world. Just ask Genghis Khan, the direct ancestor of 8-1/2% of all Chinese. Plenty of honey there, I reckon.

Just my two cent’s worth….

 
Comment by detached
2008-02-25 17:50:26 - IP Man-Hash: 4deed848cb2c4

Look guys, the writing has been on the wall since the likes of William Shakespeare and Chaucer. Even Henry the VIII knew the score. Why do you think so many princesses got locked up in a tower? It wasn’t because they were fair, they tell that to all the guys.

It takes a large level of 8th grade humor to reach the greater american public. And by greater, I mean lesser.

 
Comment by Muzalon
2008-02-25 15:25:48 - IP Man-Hash: c920e0d3b5469

Commander Scott said:

After examining a number of sites on the internet and reviewing the testimonies of various male travellers, I have finally managed to compile a list of the worst places to meet women for relationships, marriage or even something as brief as a few minutes of coitus.
Interestingly enough, the United States is not the worst place on earth to meet women. That special honour is reserved for Canada, the worst place in the world to meet anyone or anything. It is, by far, a region of the world traditionally characterized by a glacial social atmosphere almost as cold as its Arctic winters. The second worst place to meet females in their natural habitat, would definitely have to be Australia, whose women are famous for their staunch adherence to puritanical Victorian morals and materialistic frame of mind.
With nothing further ado, I present to you, in numerical order, a list of the world’s worst places to meet women:

1. Canada
2. Australia
3. United States
4. Great Britain
5. New Zealand
6. France
7. Germany
8. Italy
9. Netherlands
10. Norway
11. Denmark
12. Sweden
13. Spain
14. Portugal

Feel free to add and subtract from this list at will.

Anglo-Saxon women take the top 5 places… surprise, surprise.

 
Comment by Arbalest
2008-02-25 14:58:33 - IP Man-Hash: 520af2586786c

…Wait, the US is only third? Really?

 
Comment by Kezia
2008-02-25 14:26:53 - IP Man-Hash: 048a93e1de483

Commander Scott said:

1. Canada
2. Australia
3. United States
4. Great Britain
5. New Zealand
6. France
7. Germany
8. Italy
9. Netherlands
10. Norway
11. Denmark
12. Sweden
13. Spain
14. Portugal

Poor Western women, they’ll sure miss out on a lot.

 
Comment by Commander Scott
2008-02-25 08:54:20 - IP Man-Hash: 4754364e73d76

After examining a number of sites on the internet and reviewing the testimonies of various male travellers, I have finally managed to compile a list of the worst places to meet women for relationships, marriage or even something as brief as a few minutes of coitus.
Interestingly enough, the United States is not the worst place on earth to meet women. That special honour is reserved for Canada, the worst place in the world to meet anyone or anything. It is, by far, a region of the world traditionally characterized by a glacial social atmosphere almost as cold as its Arctic winters. The second worst place to meet females in their natural habitat, would definitely have to be Australia, whose women are famous for their staunch adherence to puritanical Victorian morals and materialistic frame of mind.
With nothing further ado, I present to you, in numerical order, a list of the world’s worst places to meet women:

1. Canada
2. Australia
3. United States
4. Great Britain
5. New Zealand
6. France
7. Germany
8. Italy
9. Netherlands
10. Norway
11. Denmark
12. Sweden
13. Spain
14. Portugal

Feel free to add and subtract from this list at will.

 
Comment by Muzalon
2008-02-24 23:38:55 - IP Man-Hash: c920e0d3b5469

TruthSayer said:

Arbalest said:

I’ld like to disagree with that. Being “better” then women at that game would only bring us down to their level. I think that instead of playing the game at all
men should just ignore women period. Besides sex, what can a woman do that a man can not do himself? Raise children? No. Create things? No. Provide sympathy? Pft. The only time men should act like women is when it comes to women’s problems. Pregnancy” Oh boo hoo men die in wars all the time, take it like a woman” Being stuck raising a child? “Boo hoo you should have kept your pants on” Rape? “That’s not important, don’t you know there’s thousands of children starving IN AFRICA? :O:O:O” I think the only way women will realize how awful they’re being is by being faced with similar attitudes. It’s not like they understand common sense anywho.

“Attraction is not a choice.” – David DeAngelo

You can’t choose what you find attractive, but if you know what is attractive to someone else you can exploit that knowledge to your benefit.

For instance, I can’t just up and decide to be attracted to short fat ugly girls. I’m attracted to tall skinny pretty girls. It’s my nature and I can’t change it. Women know what men find attractive and they try to emphasize those features with high heels, plastic surgery and makeup. That’s their “Game”.

Men can do the same thing by emphasizing the traits that women find attractive. Many men are simply unaware of exactly what those are. It’s not stooping to their level when we play the game; it’s reclaiming what was originally ours to begin with – social dominance. Again, “Game” wouldn’t be necessary if feminism hadn’t fooled the majority of men into protecting the illusion of sexual equality.

Long term success with women (I define ’success with women’ as getting laid while minimizing their personal gain) comes from mastering the hidden language that is sexual communication. It’s true that if you wish to ignore all women then there is no reason to play the game. Or, you could choose to learn the game and dominate women sexually.

I agree that women are good for nothing but sex and babies. That’s why I advocate learning the art of seduction. Mastering those skills gives you the power to have all the sex and babies you want. It also makes men better people and who doesn’t wish to better themselves? Besides women.

Sexual power in America is unbalanced in favor of women. “Game” is just another way to take that power back for men. The sad fact is that feminism is winning the war against men and we should utilize every trick in the bag to swing the pendulum back the other way. Just my opinion.

Why bother about Anglo-American women at all? There are hundreds of excellent foreign marriage sites out there. In a short time, Anglo-American females (and their obnoxious values) will fade from the population, when they die without issue. In nature, dysfunctional mating strategies are always self-corrected.

 
Comment by Arbalest
2008-02-24 14:00:20 - IP Man-Hash: 4b133309e3174

You forgot something, fame, money and attention.Starving a woman of attention is the best insult you can make.

 
Comment by Commander Scott
2008-02-24 13:39:05 - IP Man-Hash: fc27b9c9da139

Women don’t care about “game,” just money and fame. Money and fame always goes alot longer with women than any amount of game.

 
Comment by Chiodos
2008-02-24 13:16:59 - IP Man-Hash: 17d5247e842be

-Peter
True, that is pretty much useless information, but I know hundreds of random and useless facts (I have no idea why though). The reason I know is that was what I was learning about medieval facts in school last month, so it was still fresh on my mind.

 
Comment by PETER SUREWOOD.
2008-02-24 13:10:25 - IP Man-Hash: 4324edb35e1d7

Chiodos said:

What I meant to say was to Peter Surewood:

“The Age of Chivalry was also the age of the horse. Bedecked in elaborate armor and other trappings, horses were certainly well dressed, although they might have wished for lighter loads. That the horse should be featured so prominently during the Age of Chivalry is etymologically appropriate, because chivalry goes back to the Latin word caballus, “horse, especially a riding horse or packhorse.” Borrowed from French, as were so many other important words having to do with medieval English culture, the English word chivalry is first recorded in works composed around the beginning of the 14th century and is found in several senses, including “a body of armored mounted warriors serving a lord” and “knighthood as a ceremonially conferred rank in the social system.” Our modern sense, “the medieval system of knighthood,” could not exist until the passage of several centuries had allowed the perspective for such a conceptualization, with this sense being recorded first in 1765.”

thats pretty old school i never read that far into it, chiodos, as for truthsayer, i have read lots information regarding PUA culture and stuff, from the Venusian arts to some of David Deangelo stuff. Its interesting information, but it just info that should be in back your head and not practiced daily in my honest opinion. so that was basically my critique of it. ive spent lots of ‘time with it some with success and a lot without at first, ive found myself much more sucessful generally not giving a fuck about it.
nothing is more attractive to a woman when she knows right off the bat that you wont accept any non-sence what so ever form them.

 
Comment by Chiodos
2008-02-24 12:33:33 - IP Man-Hash: 17d5247e842be

What I meant to say was to Peter Surewood:

“The Age of Chivalry was also the age of the horse. Bedecked in elaborate armor and other trappings, horses were certainly well dressed, although they might have wished for lighter loads. That the horse should be featured so prominently during the Age of Chivalry is etymologically appropriate, because chivalry goes back to the Latin word caballus, “horse, especially a riding horse or packhorse.” Borrowed from French, as were so many other important words having to do with medieval English culture, the English word chivalry is first recorded in works composed around the beginning of the 14th century and is found in several senses, including “a body of armored mounted warriors serving a lord” and “knighthood as a ceremonially conferred rank in the social system.” Our modern sense, “the medieval system of knighthood,” could not exist until the passage of several centuries had allowed the perspective for such a conceptualization, with this sense being recorded first in 1765.”

 
Comment by Chiodos
2008-02-24 12:31:14 - IP Man-Hash: 17d5247e842be

Whoops! Excuse my last post. I accidently hit the “submit comment” button.

 
Comment by Chiodos
2008-02-24 12:30:18 - IP Man-Hash: 17d5247e842be

PETER SUREWOOD. said:

Chivalry was only ever an illusion. It never really existed.
blockquote>

Actually:

 
Comment by TruthSayer
2008-02-24 03:07:16 - IP Man-Hash: bf1f8818f8ec7

You’re right. I wonder how the seduction community ever even formed since real men couldn’t possibly benefit from sharing their experiences on such trivial matters.

I’ll bet that I’m the only person contributing on this topic that has actually studied said materials before judging them. Forget I brought it up, you guys are obviously experts and in no need of any more insight on women.

 
Comment by dazedandconfused
2008-02-23 22:16:36 - IP Man-Hash: 4b25fb31fe92b

TruthSayer said:
Why spend time reading anything? To learn or be entertained.

I would never suggest jumping through hoops to impress a woman. Many men fail with women because they try too hard. “Game” is not about teaching men to work harder to gain the affection of one woman; it’s about teaching men to gain the affection of all women with less effort.

The bottom line is that there is much that can be learned from studying seduction. Why is the topic so tabooed here? If anything this community should be embracing a skill set that transfers power from women back to men. What are we doing on this site if we’re not disseminating information that is pertinent to our cause? Seduction has a place here and I’d suggest people give it a second glance before snubbing their noses at it for good.

Tuning chicks is something that comes complementary with a man’s instincts. There shouldn’t be a need to talk about it, especially when the only thing holding men back from attempting to seduce a woman is intimidation. That in itself is unmanly and shouldn’t even be mentioned. To those who want to seduce women, man the fuck up and stop looking for a magic solution from other people.

*D3C*

 
Comment by TruthSayer
2008-02-23 05:36:17 - IP Man-Hash: bf1f8818f8ec7

PETER SUREWOOD. said:

all these “”PUA”" seduction stuff is all great and all but really, why spend all that time reading and doing all that stuff? It is never worth it to jump through hoops and to put a lot of effort into getting or keeping pussy if all you want is sex. Pussy is NEVER worth a lot of effort. Just do what you want to do with your time. If pussy wants to come along, great. If not, just tell her to get lost, The minute you do tell her to get lost, 5 minutes later you can move on to the next. Single Woman now are just as common as finding raisins in your trail mix bag. If you can get pussy with very little effort, then great. But if not, pass on her and wait for another woman to come along, there really isnt much use for you to go after them after a while… they are there to met us anyway. in these times, woman have to work even harder to appeal to us. Sex is just a commodity. Spend your time and energy on making money, starting a business, or travel…

Why spend time reading anything? To learn or be entertained.

I would never suggest jumping through hoops to impress a woman. Many men fail with women because they try too hard. “Game” is not about teaching men to work harder to gain the affection of one woman; it’s about teaching men to gain the affection of all women with less effort.

The bottom line is that there is much that can be learned from studying seduction. Why is the topic so tabooed here? If anything this community should be embracing a skill set that transfers power from women back to men. What are we doing on this site if we’re not disseminating information that is pertinent to our cause? Seduction has a place here and I’d suggest people give it a second glance before snubbing their noses at it for good.

 
Comment by PETER SUREWOOD.
2008-02-22 15:20:04 - IP Man-Hash: 93b7be8b82f62

all these “”PUA”" seduction stuff is all great and all but really, why spend all that time reading and doing all that stuff? It is never worth it to jump through hoops and to put a lot of effort into getting or keeping pussy if all you want is sex. Pussy is NEVER worth a lot of effort. Just do what you want to do with your time. If pussy wants to come along, great. If not, just tell her to get lost, The minute you do tell her to get lost, 5 minutes later you can move on to the next. Single Woman now are just as common as finding raisins in your trail mix bag. If you can get pussy with very little effort, then great. But if not, pass on her and wait for another woman to come along, there really isnt much use for you to go after them after a while… they are there to met us anyway. in these times, woman have to work even harder to appeal to us. Sex is just a commodity. Spend your time and energy on making money, starting a business, or travel…

 
Comment by TruthSayer
2008-02-22 13:31:43 - IP Man-Hash: f78d821cb12a8

Arbalest said:

I’ld like to disagree with that. Being “better” then women at that game would only bring us down to their level. I think that instead of playing the game at all
men should just ignore women period. Besides sex, what can a woman do that a man can not do himself? Raise children? No. Create things? No. Provide sympathy? Pft. The only time men should act like women is when it comes to women’s problems. Pregnancy” Oh boo hoo men die in wars all the time, take it like a woman” Being stuck raising a child? “Boo hoo you should have kept your pants on” Rape? “That’s not important, don’t you know there’s thousands of children starving IN AFRICA? :O:O:O” I think the only way women will realize how awful they’re being is by being faced with similar attitudes. It’s not like they understand common sense anywho.

“Attraction is not a choice.” – David DeAngelo

You can’t choose what you find attractive, but if you know what is attractive to someone else you can exploit that knowledge to your benefit.

For instance, I can’t just up and decide to be attracted to short fat ugly girls. I’m attracted to tall skinny pretty girls. It’s my nature and I can’t change it. Women know what men find attractive and they try to emphasize those features with high heels, plastic surgery and makeup. That’s their “Game”.

Men can do the same thing by emphasizing the traits that women find attractive. Many men are simply unaware of exactly what those are. It’s not stooping to their level when we play the game; it’s reclaiming what was originally ours to begin with – social dominance. Again, “Game” wouldn’t be necessary if feminism hadn’t fooled the majority of men into protecting the illusion of sexual equality.

Long term success with women (I define ’success with women’ as getting laid while minimizing their personal gain) comes from mastering the hidden language that is sexual communication. It’s true that if you wish to ignore all women then there is no reason to play the game. Or, you could choose to learn the game and dominate women sexually.

I agree that women are good for nothing but sex and babies. That’s why I advocate learning the art of seduction. Mastering those skills gives you the power to have all the sex and babies you want. It also makes men better people and who doesn’t wish to better themselves? Besides women.

Sexual power in America is unbalanced in favor of women. “Game” is just another way to take that power back for men. The sad fact is that feminism is winning the war against men and we should utilize every trick in the bag to swing the pendulum back the other way. Just my opinion.

 
Comment by Arbalest
2008-02-22 12:31:13 - IP Man-Hash: 53cd2fe91961c

I’ld like to disagree with that. Being “better” then women at that game would only bring us down to their level. I think that instead of playing the game at all
men should just ignore women period. Besides sex, what can a woman do that a man can not do himself? Raise children? No. Create things? No. Provide sympathy? Pft. The only time men should act like women is when it comes to women’s problems. Pregnancy” Oh boo hoo men die in wars all the time, take it like a woman” Being stuck raising a child? “Boo hoo you should have kept your pants on” Rape? “That’s not important, don’t you know there’s thousands of children starving IN AFRICA? :O:O:O” I think the only way women will realize how awful they’re being is by being faced with similar attitudes. It’s not like they understand common sense anywho.

 
Comment by TruthSayer
2008-02-22 11:46:38 - IP Man-Hash: f78d821cb12a8

Dick Masterson said:

“For the record, I have never hit a woman unless it was hilarious.”

“I have only seen one man walk into a door and not only was he so drunk that he didn’t remember it the next day, but I pushed him into the door.”

I haven’t laughed that hard since I first found this site. Thanks, Dick.

On the topic of chivalry, does anyone know the origins of the half stand? In the movie “American Gangster” Denzel does a half stand at the dinner table when his women excuses herself. I’ve flipped through a couple books on etiquette but I’ve come up empty handed.

The combination of chauvinism and chivalry really does make sense. With knowledge comes responsibility. We can’t know that women are useless idiots and not make attempts to guide them along in the world. It would be cruel to watch them try to do things like open doors and pull out chairs without our assistance. Letting women do anything for themselves is chancy and often ends in embarrassment.

Dick Masterson said:

“Game” is a myth.

That’s the second negative reference to “Game” that I’ve seen here recently.

Isn’t “Game” just another word for the skills required to attract any mate, anytime, anywhere and make her do anything?

The power of selection is not held primarily by males anymore. Sure, there are some men who have retained their dominance over women using money and status and even fewer who do it without the aid of props, but many, if not most men are so befuddled by women today that even the thought of approaching one and having a conversation with her makes them weak in the knees.

That’s where “Game” comes in. While women are resigned to their looks as a means of attracting a mate, men get to use their brains. Women have only a small window where they are attractive to the opposite sex before they get too old. Men can be charming and witty their entire lives.

“Game” is in fact the antidote to this whole feminazi thing. Take the power back from women as a whole by using their own strategies against them. Overt acts of violence would be met with resistance from the already brainwashed masses of men who bought into the illusion of women’s equality/superiority. Men must be taught how to overpower women through tact and manipulation. It’s the same game they play and it seems to work against them quite well.

I’d really like to see more PUA (pick-up artist) information dissemination taking place here at MABTW. Maybe in the forums? Studying “Game” is just another way to exert power over women and to reclaim the status that has been stolen from men under the guise of equality.

In conclusion, men are better than women at “Game”. We just need more men playing the game.

 
Comment by stonemonkey
2008-02-22 09:06:27 - IP Man-Hash: 15d104f7f237c

You know what the funniest thing is, chivalry (which I have to say did exist and disagree with Surewood), was all about putting a women on a pedestal and treating her a bit like a divine object. It was a code that men at arms lived by. Defend the weak and all that stuff. Its EXACTLY the sort of crap women want……so I find it hilarious that now its an insult.

“I am so sorry that I treated you with respect and helped you carry that heavy suitcase. I didnt know it was wrong to be chivalrous so…… fuck you then, you smelly pus dripping vagina, you can drag it along the ground like a monkey.”

 
Comment by detached
2008-02-22 08:26:25 - IP Man-Hash: d361f6c058cc7

Chivalry is using the pillowcase to wipe your dick off, not the curtains.

 
Comment by PETER SUREWOOD.
2008-02-21 17:03:40 - IP Man-Hash: 93b7be8b82f62

Chivalry was only ever an illusion. It never really existed.

Holy wars were common place at about the time chivalry was created as was crime and the church had no way to support mercenaries without lowering its own reputation. Thus, the church conceived the idea of knights and chivalry purely as a way to gain influence and money over the “flock”.

kinda funny cause isnt this the kind of shit going on now?

 
Comment by frank
2008-02-21 08:58:51 - IP Man-Hash: 65437965d1635

that so true. I have always wondered why and when men started opening doors for women, at least i know why now.

 
Comment by Paul
2008-02-21 05:43:14 - IP Man-Hash: a4b8e88361535

This is by far one of the most perfect fucking articles I’ve ever read on this website. Keep up the good work. And your appearance on Dr. Phil was awesome. Those women will remember you forever. Hell I bet most of them dream about you now while they are with their husbands or cheating on their man.

 
Comment by Talon
2008-02-21 03:46:09 - IP Man-Hash: c04456432da11

Not going out of your way to make a woman look foolish for things she is biologically incapable of doing: opening doors, paying for things, sitting down and not fucking anything with a pulse; is something women value.

Brilliant article.

 

Close
E-mail It
Powered by ShareThis