The Etymology of Chivalry
While on the Dr. Phil program, a woman accused me of being chivalrous. Now I’m never one to argue with a woman. For example, if a woman wants to get smacked around by her boyfriend every time she runs her mouth, then who am I to say it’s wrong? This isn’t some fascist dystopia. Women have the choice to get their asses kicked if that’s what they want. They also have the choice to not ask for a raise because they’re cowards and then blame the wage gap on sexism.
In a free world, women have the choice to be retarded.
For the record, I have never hit a woman unless it was hilarious.
As a man, when I’m accused of something, I think about what that something is before running my mouth in defense. Call a woman a whore and she’ll start screaming like a fire alarm. Good luck shutting her up because a woman’s 9-Volt battery is harder to find than her G-Spot.
The G-Spot is not a myth. It drives women insane with pleasure and lust and it’s easy it’s find. It’s right where you sign the check. X marks the spot.
Since a woman accused me of being it, I chose to define “chivalry” in terms that a woman could understand before I asked myself if I was. My manclusion is that I indeed am because “chivalry” is impossible to escape in a free world — where women choose to be as retarded as inbred monkeys.
Opening Doors
When left on their own, women walk into doors a hundred times more often than men.
Off the top of my head I can think of six women who I have seen walk into doors. None of them were under any kind of influence; although one was in Paris so she might have been overcome by the scent of arrogance and expensive perfume. The French call that Le Sex Panther. Nor were any of them blind.
I have only seen one man walk into a door and not only was he so drunk that he didn’t remember it the next day, but I pushed him into the door.
There’s a reason sex toys don’t come with a purple magic marker you can use to decorate them like a bruised peach before using. That same reason is why it became customary for men to open the doors for women. Men don’t like our sex toys looking like dinged up trash.
Women can’t open anything correctly. Doors, potato chips, or their legs. “Lesbian” sex is brought to you by cheap Merlot and the letters G, H, and B.
Pulling out Chairs
They say it’s chivalrous to pull out a chair for a woman. Well it is, but only in the same way that it’s chivalrous to get your girlfriend’s email password so you can make sure she isn’t signed up to any dating websites. She probably is and you need to get on that. Grown women need more protection on the internet than children.
It isn’t polite for a woman to whisper to her friends while you’re around, so why is it polite for her to have an unknown email password? It’s the same thing. Women don’t “window shop” for something they don’t want to buy.
Paying for Things
Women have never had money, continue to have no money, and never will have any money.
The only reason women can “own” property in this day and age is because you can’t “own” property in this day and age. You just rent it. If you don’t agree with that, go a year without paying your property tax and send me an apology from the Y. Then send your landlord, the government, the backrent.
Women have no understanding of money. They’re like scavenging rats with it and they always will be. Rats can’t reach the counter top or open the fridge and prostitution is illegal. So is selling babies. How else would a rat or a woman get any money?
If you’re up for a fiscal gas, ask a woman why it’s a bad time to get married and buy a house. Better yet, ask a female Realtor. Her poor little brain might have a meltdown. A subprime meltdown.
And of course not going out of your way to blow a woman’s mind is the definition of chivalry. Not going out of your way to make a woman look foolish for things she is biologically incapable of doing: opening doors, paying for things, sitting down and not fucking anything with a pulse; is something women value.
“Game” is a myth. Persistence, alcohol, and making sure your woman isn’t running into any doors has worked since the beginning of time.
No women allowed.
Related Articles:
February 21st, 2008 at 3:46 am - IP Man-Hash: c04456432da11
Not going out of your way to make a woman look foolish for things she is biologically incapable of doing: opening doors, paying for things, sitting down and not fucking anything with a pulse; is something women value.
Brilliant article.
February 21st, 2008 at 5:43 am - IP Man-Hash: a4b8e88361535
This is by far one of the most perfect fucking articles I’ve ever read on this website. Keep up the good work. And your appearance on Dr. Phil was awesome. Those women will remember you forever. Hell I bet most of them dream about you now while they are with their husbands or cheating on their man.
February 21st, 2008 at 8:58 am - IP Man-Hash: 65437965d1635
that so true. I have always wondered why and when men started opening doors for women, at least i know why now.
February 21st, 2008 at 5:03 pm - IP Man-Hash: 93b7be8b82f62
Chivalry was only ever an illusion. It never really existed.
Holy wars were common place at about the time chivalry was created as was crime and the church had no way to support mercenaries without lowering its own reputation. Thus, the church conceived the idea of knights and chivalry purely as a way to gain influence and money over the “flock”.
kinda funny cause isnt this the kind of shit going on now?
February 22nd, 2008 at 8:26 am - IP Man-Hash: d361f6c058cc7
Chivalry is using the pillowcase to wipe your dick off, not the curtains.
February 22nd, 2008 at 9:06 am - IP Man-Hash: 15d104f7f237c
You know what the funniest thing is, chivalry (which I have to say did exist and disagree with Surewood), was all about putting a women on a pedestal and treating her a bit like a divine object. It was a code that men at arms lived by. Defend the weak and all that stuff. Its EXACTLY the sort of crap women want……so I find it hilarious that now its an insult.
“I am so sorry that I treated you with respect and helped you carry that heavy suitcase. I didnt know it was wrong to be chivalrous so…… fuck you then, you smelly pus dripping vagina, you can drag it along the ground like a monkey.”
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:46 am - IP Man-Hash: f78d821cb12a8
I haven’t laughed that hard since I first found this site. Thanks, Dick.
On the topic of chivalry, does anyone know the origins of the half stand? In the movie “American Gangster” Denzel does a half stand at the dinner table when his women excuses herself. I’ve flipped through a couple books on etiquette but I’ve come up empty handed.
The combination of chauvinism and chivalry really does make sense. With knowledge comes responsibility. We can’t know that women are useless idiots and not make attempts to guide them along in the world. It would be cruel to watch them try to do things like open doors and pull out chairs without our assistance. Letting women do anything for themselves is chancy and often ends in embarrassment.
That’s the second negative reference to “Game” that I’ve seen here recently.
Isn’t “Game” just another word for the skills required to attract any mate, anytime, anywhere and make her do anything?
The power of selection is not held primarily by males anymore. Sure, there are some men who have retained their dominance over women using money and status and even fewer who do it without the aid of props, but many, if not most men are so befuddled by women today that even the thought of approaching one and having a conversation with her makes them weak in the knees.
That’s where “Game” comes in. While women are resigned to their looks as a means of attracting a mate, men get to use their brains. Women have only a small window where they are attractive to the opposite sex before they get too old. Men can be charming and witty their entire lives.
“Game” is in fact the antidote to this whole feminazi thing. Take the power back from women as a whole by using their own strategies against them. Overt acts of violence would be met with resistance from the already brainwashed masses of men who bought into the illusion of women’s equality/superiority. Men must be taught how to overpower women through tact and manipulation. It’s the same game they play and it seems to work against them quite well.
I’d really like to see more PUA (pick-up artist) information dissemination taking place here at MABTW. Maybe in the forums? Studying “Game” is just another way to exert power over women and to reclaim the status that has been stolen from men under the guise of equality.
In conclusion, men are better than women at “Game”. We just need more men playing the game.
February 22nd, 2008 at 12:31 pm - IP Man-Hash: 53cd2fe91961c
I’ld like to disagree with that. Being “better” then women at that game would only bring us down to their level. I think that instead of playing the game at all
men should just ignore women period. Besides sex, what can a woman do that a man can not do himself? Raise children? No. Create things? No. Provide sympathy? Pft. The only time men should act like women is when it comes to women’s problems. Pregnancy” Oh boo hoo men die in wars all the time, take it like a woman” Being stuck raising a child? “Boo hoo you should have kept your pants on” Rape? “That’s not important, don’t you know there’s thousands of children starving IN AFRICA? :O:O:O” I think the only way women will realize how awful they’re being is by being faced with similar attitudes. It’s not like they understand common sense anywho.
February 22nd, 2008 at 1:31 pm - IP Man-Hash: f78d821cb12a8
“Attraction is not a choice.” - David DeAngelo
You can’t choose what you find attractive, but if you know what is attractive to someone else you can exploit that knowledge to your benefit.
For instance, I can’t just up and decide to be attracted to short fat ugly girls. I’m attracted to tall skinny pretty girls. It’s my nature and I can’t change it. Women know what men find attractive and they try to emphasize those features with high heels, plastic surgery and makeup. That’s their “Game”.
Men can do the same thing by emphasizing the traits that women find attractive. Many men are simply unaware of exactly what those are. It’s not stooping to their level when we play the game; it’s reclaiming what was originally ours to begin with - social dominance. Again, “Game” wouldn’t be necessary if feminism hadn’t fooled the majority of men into protecting the illusion of sexual equality.
Long term success with women (I define ’success with women’ as getting laid while minimizing their personal gain) comes from mastering the hidden language that is sexual communication. It’s true that if you wish to ignore all women then there is no reason to play the game. Or, you could choose to learn the game and dominate women sexually.
I agree that women are good for nothing but sex and babies. That’s why I advocate learning the art of seduction. Mastering those skills gives you the power to have all the sex and babies you want. It also makes men better people and who doesn’t wish to better themselves? Besides women.
Sexual power in America is unbalanced in favor of women. “Game” is just another way to take that power back for men. The sad fact is that feminism is winning the war against men and we should utilize every trick in the bag to swing the pendulum back the other way. Just my opinion.
February 22nd, 2008 at 3:20 pm - IP Man-Hash: 93b7be8b82f62
all these “”PUA”" seduction stuff is all great and all but really, why spend all that time reading and doing all that stuff? It is never worth it to jump through hoops and to put a lot of effort into getting or keeping pussy if all you want is sex. Pussy is NEVER worth a lot of effort. Just do what you want to do with your time. If pussy wants to come along, great. If not, just tell her to get lost, The minute you do tell her to get lost, 5 minutes later you can move on to the next. Single Woman now are just as common as finding raisins in your trail mix bag. If you can get pussy with very little effort, then great. But if not, pass on her and wait for another woman to come along, there really isnt much use for you to go after them after a while… they are there to met us anyway. in these times, woman have to work even harder to appeal to us. Sex is just a commodity. Spend your time and energy on making money, starting a business, or travel…
February 23rd, 2008 at 5:36 am - IP Man-Hash: bf1f8818f8ec7
Why spend time reading anything? To learn or be entertained.
I would never suggest jumping through hoops to impress a woman. Many men fail with women because they try too hard. “Game” is not about teaching men to work harder to gain the affection of one woman; it’s about teaching men to gain the affection of all women with less effort.
The bottom line is that there is much that can be learned from studying seduction. Why is the topic so tabooed here? If anything this community should be embracing a skill set that transfers power from women back to men. What are we doing on this site if we’re not disseminating information that is pertinent to our cause? Seduction has a place here and I’d suggest people give it a second glance before snubbing their noses at it for good.
February 23rd, 2008 at 10:16 pm - IP Man-Hash: 4b25fb31fe92b
Tuning chicks is something that comes complementary with a man’s instincts. There shouldn’t be a need to talk about it, especially when the only thing holding men back from attempting to seduce a woman is intimidation. That in itself is unmanly and shouldn’t even be mentioned. To those who want to seduce women, man the fuck up and stop looking for a magic solution from other people.
*D3C*
February 24th, 2008 at 3:07 am - IP Man-Hash: bf1f8818f8ec7
You’re right. I wonder how the seduction community ever even formed since real men couldn’t possibly benefit from sharing their experiences on such trivial matters.
I’ll bet that I’m the only person contributing on this topic that has actually studied said materials before judging them. Forget I brought it up, you guys are obviously experts and in no need of any more insight on women.
February 24th, 2008 at 12:30 pm - IP Man-Hash: 17d5247e842be