The Sisterhood of Dumbness
Women have to work extra hard to succeed at anything.
Myth! In actuality, women simply have to show up to be successful. Take swimsuit models. That’s about the most important and meaningful job a woman can ever hope to have or aspire to. Swimsuit models don’t have to fucking do anything but show up and let a man take their pictures.
That’s the real work in modeling of course: the picture taking. The way you can tell is by looking at all the jobs in a photography session and seeing which ones men do. This rule can be applied universally.
For God’s sake, have you seen what some of those models look like when they roll out of bed? Only exactly the same as every other woman in the world. Of course it would take a man to turn that into an object of fine art — or other type of art.
My point, however, is that women barely have to work at all in order to be successful. Think about it.
Women don’t have to learn anything or be prepared for an interview because in most countries, laws force employers to hire them. And if they don’t, all hiring is done by men anyway. Men are smart creatures, you see, and they know that hiring a woman will increase the chances of fucking said woman. That’s called survival of the species. Men are team players like that. Women, on the other hand, would be content to let the entire race die off just to take their precious sense of entitlement to the grave.
Women also don’t have to know how to do anything at work in order to not be fired, as there will always be some man around to fill in her gaps of competence in order to — all together now — increase his chances of fucking her.
The bullshit here is that this is seen as a bad thing. It’s biology folks. It’s as positive as recycling and soy milk — both of which I hate as a man. The biology in play here says two things:
1. Men are predisposed to the betterment of all human beings — including the desire to deepen the gene pool.
2. Women are lazy.
There’s a reason you’ve never told a woman she’s done a ‘half-assed job’ at anything. It’s because when it comes to women, if they even showed up they’ve used their whole ass. There’s a double entendre there that while very clever is much more so when left to your own imangination.
If anything, this is just one example of “Girl Power” actually working to benefit women. By the time a slightly competent woman works her way into a career. And I don’t know how she ended up even slightly competent. Let’s suspend our man-belief for the moment. Perhaps she was just ugly. By the time this uggo is in a career position, so many women have colossally fucked up before her, she’s a shoe-in for upper management.
Women who are even slightly competent are like professional athletes in the Special Olympics.
Related Articles:
May 2nd, 2006 at 8:30 am - IP Man-Hash: d0c4311b71dc2
This is crass.
Men only hire a woman to fuck said woman? How double standard! That just highlights how shallow and superfical these men are.
If men were more professional than women at their jobs they wouldn´t hire women with the intent to fuck her. What a pathetic waste of time for the company. Wouldn´t it make more sense to hire someone to do the job well, rather than obsessing over getting their ends off.
The only thing you have proved here is that men would waste their professional time hiring a woman just to fuck her - says a lot more about men than it does women, if you look at it carefully.
May 2nd, 2006 at 9:04 am - IP Man-Hash: 5950bb08d3016
You need to stop listening to Enya and understand the magnitiude of this post.
What Dick and we are saying is that women get ahead by their sex appeal rather than by their merits in many cases, and the fact that you go and attack us here on this page is proof principle that you agree with this assessment.
Why not attack the argument rather than attack the poster and side comments he made off topic in a satirical way?
You could have been more constructive and said, “no women get jobs because us have smarts”
But instead you just attack all of us men. At least when we make comments we state the facts.
Just like any man that is a real good friend with a woman is a Mangina and he just wants to fuck her as well.
Truth be told many of these people that do the hiring in this posts case are Manginas who think they can score this way and this also doesn’t represent the feelings on the majority of us that post on this page. These same manginas are also the ones that are scared to tell a woman she did a half-ass job.
I on the other hand have fired two women in the past year because they did not meet the job requirements on the job and were lazy. I am not scared by any feminist backlash because I am a man. I also hired ugly women as well that had “good” credentials.
Anyways guys, I started my blog: http://truthformen.blogspot.com/
It’s a work in progres
May 2nd, 2006 at 9:15 am - IP Man-Hash: b522825ecb752
Enya,
You have missed the point about as efficiently as Helen Keller misses the bullseye in a game of darts.
“Wouldn´t it make more sense to hire someone to do the job well, rather than obsessing over getting their ends off.”
You bet your ass it would, but that would require an office full of men…and we all know what fate awaits a company that doesn’t hire women. So, if, by law, we are obligated to employ the weaker sex, we might as well hire on those that would be good for a toss in the sheets.
“That just highlights how shallow and superfical these men are.”
Wrong again. That just highlights how when men are handed a big, lazy sack of shitty lemons, we turn it into a delicious bottle of scotch. Men are natural problem solvers. If we can’t get out of a bad situation, we turn it to our advantage.
“…men would waste their professional time hiring a woman…”
Yup, you’re absolutely right. It is a waste of time.
May 2nd, 2006 at 9:21 am - IP Man-Hash: 5950bb08d3016
Esther, well said
May 2nd, 2006 at 10:36 am - IP Man-Hash: f3ae1ac46a2e3
That’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard. Some things are more important than money and working, Enya. You would understand that if you weren’t a career obsessed woman with no hope of having a child.
-Dick
May 2nd, 2006 at 2:26 pm - IP Man-Hash: 19105c7fbb7a4
I think you missed Enya’s point also Lukeasz. Don’t you think that the fact men would hire women only for their sex appeal a bit crass? I don’t think she attacked any men personally, she was basing her points on what Dick had said.
The fact that men hire women due to their sexual appeal doesn’t speak well for men or women, in fact it proves both genders to be equally superficial. It was not Enya who was suggesting that men hire sexually attractive women in order to fuck them, it was Dick.
May 2nd, 2006 at 2:32 pm - IP Man-Hash: 19105c7fbb7a4
No. I think what you are saying highlights Enya’s point further. How crass, if you cannot hire the gender you want, hire women anyway because that way you can get your sexual gratification. Is that your answer to every problem?
May 2nd, 2006 at 2:40 pm - IP Man-Hash: 19105c7fbb7a4
Dick I think you should listen to Lukasz, he has some good advice for you.
Interesting that you criticise women for attacking your views by saying you have a small penis or that you are gay…of course, you say, this is typical women stereotyping men, and yet…
…the moment a woman criticizes you, you attack her for being career obsessed and having no hope for having children - it is clear you don’t like being stereotyped, and even rage and rant about it here, and yet you go and do the exact same to women.
You, Dick, are a massive hypocrite.
May 2nd, 2006 at 3:12 pm - IP Man-Hash: f3ae1ac46a2e3
What does my penis have to do with being a hypocrite?
Either way, I disagree with you completely because your Man Hash tells a different story.
-Dick
May 2nd, 2006 at 3:44 pm - IP Man-Hash: 4395afe5d7df1
Gent/Effing Pot you’ve quoted Lukasz out of context. The quote was not directed at Dick, but at Enya. Don’t put words into other peoples mouths.
May 2nd, 2006 at 3:46 pm - IP Man-Hash: f3ae1ac46a2e3
Women should only be worried about their own mouth and they should only be worried about putting one thing into it. Am I right or am I right.
-Dick
May 2nd, 2006 at 4:57 pm - IP Man-Hash: 1a5d2c44f3578
Of course you are right Dick, after all you are a man!
This article couldn’t be more true. I work in an office where I am the only man, all the women that have been hired (except for one) were hired purely for their sex appeal. I say this not because they are particularly sexy, but simply because they couldn’t have been hired for their skills as they possess none. The only woman who wasn’t hired for sex appeal was hired by a woman whom my boss made the mistake of giving authority over hiring decisions to. So it just goes to show that women can’t even understand the proper procedures for hiring other women!
You are also quite correct that these women, who possess no skills, must rely on the men around to handle any difficult tasks that come up. In my case, since I’m the only guy in the office, this means that all the women, including my managers, are constantly asking me to fix everything they fucked up. Hell, if they fired everyone in the office except for me and the receptionist, I would still be doing all the work, but I could do it right the first time and still leave a half and hour early every day!
Oh well, some day I will own the company and then I can fire them all at their performance reviews for giving me substandard blowjobs.
May 2nd, 2006 at 5:00 pm - IP Man-Hash: f3ae1ac46a2e3
Good to hear you’re on your way up, Boogieman.
That’s a man for you. Optimistic.
-Dick
May 2nd, 2006 at 5:18 pm - IP Man-Hash: 0e2f2db43d2f0
It’s not as much of an answer as it is a consolation prize.
May 3rd, 2006 at 6:15 am - IP Man-Hash: eadd56da2c7c9
There are only two genders. If you cannot hire the gender you want, you have no choice but to hire a woman.
There were a few two-syllable words in there, but I assume you got the gist of it.
Post again if you don’t understand. I’ll ignore you, but wolfe is very patient and may well try to reason with you.
-Big Al
May 3rd, 2006 at 3:09 pm - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
Oh, I’m pretty much leaving the Effing Pot and Gent debacle alone. At least until I brew some of Lukasz’ super-bock… and it’s too late in the year (or too early) to drink it, so Effing is out of luck.
Esther, ‘if they run…’, and you seem to be doing a fine job.
-wolfe
May 3rd, 2006 at 4:23 pm - IP Man-Hash: 19105c7fbb7a4
No YOU have misunderstood ‘if they run’. I [Gent/Effing Pot] was directing Lukeasz’s quote at Dick because even though Lukeasz aimed it initially at someone else, the same rule can be applied to Dick too.
May 3rd, 2006 at 4:30 pm - IP Man-Hash: 19105c7fbb7a4
Dick. I am not going to bother talking to you. You don’t write or state anything with any intent of reaching an understanding.
Regardless of my man-hash the fact still stands, you are a hypocrite. If you didn’t understand, you can always read the post again.
May 3rd, 2006 at 4:48 pm - IP Man-Hash: f3ae1ac46a2e3
If you aren’t going to bother talking to me, why did you respond?
Because you’re a woman.
-Dick
May 3rd, 2006 at 5:16 pm - IP Man-Hash: 19105c7fbb7a4
Okay. Since Dick does not understand a simple message, lets do a little grammar lesson today. If you are going to be pedantic about the intricacies of the English language, two can play at that little game.
The phrase ‘..I am not going to…(verb)’ is a progressive future tense of the verb ‘to go’ meaning that in the future I am not going to bother talking to you. Don’t write this off as a woman’s rule, it is grammatical fact - future tense does not mean or include present. In the case above, the post was letting you know that from after that post, I was not going to bother talking to you.
Why am I responding to you now? Because you are a man, and you do not understand language as you think you do, and as a result I am put in a position where I have to correct you, lest you make the same dumb mistake over and over.
Now I will say this again. Dick, in the future, after this post, I am not going to bother dealing with you.
May 3rd, 2006 at 5:25 pm - IP Man-Hash: f3ae1ac46a2e3
You could have simply said, “like most women, I’m not happy unless I have the last word.”
Or the preferred abbreviation: “I’m a bitch.”
-Dick
May 4th, 2006 at 2:53 am - IP Man-Hash: 356b2e2244d02
Who wants to pay the same money to a woman when none of them can perform even simple tasks like un-jamming a photocopier or printer, something any man can do half-asleep.
Once again cause and effect is lost on them. Either that or they don’t want to get toner on their immaculate little hands and make their shiny diamond rings all mucky. O Horror of horrors.
Women are a liability at the best of times. They should keep their fucking mouths shut and stick to making the tea like they used to.
May 4th, 2006 at 6:56 am - IP Man-Hash: f2a1311f766b9
You just another imposter and a fake. Beat it.
Effing pot Says:
April 27th, 2006 at 3:13 am- IP Man-Hash:
My point still stands that if the sex was crap for Dick it was obviously crap for her too.
Gent Says:
April 27th, 2006 at 1:37 pm- IP Man-Hash:
May 4th, 2006 at 1:43 pm - IP Man-Hash: bf676da55b650
Good one Dick, good one…
May 5th, 2006 at 5:05 am - IP Man-Hash: 8f5fa079b338a
Here’s a good workplace story for you, guys (and sorry for not posting in a while — I’ve been busy and am getting busier for reasons which will become apparent):
Yesterday, one of my coworkers was taken out for a drug test and then suspended. He’s going to be let go today. He’s a well-known alcoholic who had apparently come to work smelling of alcohol once too often.
The head of HR is a woman. Because we employ a lot of union people and because she’s involved in terminations on a daily basis, she’s gotten the nickname “the hatchet.”
She immediately turned the whole business of my coworker over to her assistant, a man. The reason? She didn’t want to get into a potentially violent situation with a drunk man.
Now, on the level of personal safety, I applaud her discretion. I honestly wouldn’t want her to do the dirty work in this situation because she’s right: the guy might have burst into a drunken rage and hurt her.
However, does anyone think it’s an accident that her male assistant just happens to be an ex-cop? And if the head of HR weren’t female, I wonder if she’d need an assistant at all? How much is my company spending in order to employee two people when one might suffice if she weren’t female?
May 5th, 2006 at 5:26 am - IP Man-Hash: eadd56da2c7c9
Sinecures for relatives is called “nepotism”, Dakota.
Sinecures for women is called “affirmative action”.
Nepotism is bad and leads to lack of competitiveness and corruption. Unless you’re a woman.
Affirmative action is good and leads to empowerment. Unless you’re a man.
Get used to it.
-Big Al
May 6th, 2006 at 1:52 am - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
Hey Dakota. Great to see you. Glad you’re still out there. Now if only Alan would post…
Big Al pretty much said it. And I agree with Dakota on the merits of personal safety for the woman in question. I’ll give a slightly different perspective — from that of the guy doing the hiring.
When I first co-founded a company I was pretty green and naive. We were all in our mid 20’s, and I genuinely believed in giving women a slightly better chance than men. Our company was highly technical in nature, doing (for the time) some fairly advanced R&D. Qualified female candidates for jobs were a tiny minority. We had only 2-3 competitors globally, and we were 6-12 months ahead, which was amazing.
We had a race and gender neutral interview process, but it could always be shaded slightly (5% or so), so that if a “very very nearly as strong” female candidate applied, she’d often get the job. Make no mistake: I wasn’t an idiot, just naive. A woman who genuinely rated a 3.0/4 wouldn’t beat a man who rated a 3.2, but she might beat a man who rated a 3.1, and she would beat a man who rated 3.0.
Did I learn fast.
Essentially, hire a woman, and you’ve got to ensure without fail that there is a man who can do her job and he’s nearby, ready to take over. It isn’t just babies, it’s all kinds of crap.
A hungry guy is looking to work very hard and wave a big sword at the competition. A hungry woman is looking for a meal-ticket.
Older and wiser,
-wolfe
May 16th, 2006 at 8:19 am - IP Man-Hash: 12f99abd0c932
Hello
May 16th, 2006 at 8:29 am - IP Man-Hash: 12f99abd0c932
The people on this website are fighting a battle that can never be fully won on either side. There will always be people who hate the opposite sex. But this fued is meaningless. Those who hate females, or males, are unfairly basing their view of them on a few bad expierences. Don’t let those expierences ruin any hope you have for happiness.
May 16th, 2006 at 9:31 am - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
I think you are seeing something that is not present, Thaydule, or possibly projecting. Very few, if any, people on this site hate women.
-wolfe
May 16th, 2006 at 1:25 pm - IP Man-Hash: 0f9ef2ee68c43
I strongly agree Wolfe, however I might add that most women that come on here, seem to have it in their heads that watching Dr. Phil makes them an expert on the human psyche.
Strength and Honor
June 13th, 2006 at 2:25 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Maybe less coin beating on the ip hash is called for.
Wouldn’t want them suckers to eventually wise up to it, would we? Spoil all the fun.
June 14th, 2006 at 12:32 am - IP Man-Hash: ed8b4eb7d4be8
That’s a smart idea, sonyad, but they never catch on. Women here have fucked it up five times in a row without a second thought.
-Dick
June 14th, 2006 at 1:16 am - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
And as I said elsewhere, there are a series of fairly trivial techniques (for a man) to allow one to ignore the limited technique Female is now using.
-wolfe
June 14th, 2006 at 3:14 pm - IP Man-Hash: 442ae7cfaf56b
Could just be multiple personality disorder !
June 14th, 2006 at 3:28 pm - IP Man-Hash: 442ae7cfaf56b
This is a response I received on my blog “WHat men are saying about women”, and it sums up the selfsih “privilege princesses” to a “T”.
Have a look at the response I received from another Male about the selfish bitches in other vocations in the comments section.
June 14th, 2006 at 3:29 pm - IP Man-Hash: 442ae7cfaf56b
Check this link….
http://whatmenthinkofwomen.blogspot.com/
June 14th, 2006 at 6:46 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5475964f1d333
MPD as a diagnostic name for the disorder was phased about about 10 - 15 years ago. It’s now called DID (dissociative identity disorder). And I don’t have it. It is also a completely different disorder to schizophrenia. Please remember this because Hollywood has some kind of amnestic disorder and cannot.
In terms of using mules, it appears there are a few people on this site with some sock puppets.
June 14th, 2006 at 9:15 pm - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
Ah, the return of our good friend DSM-IV.
Leaving that aside, I think there’s only been one person sock-puppeting here.
-wolfe
June 14th, 2006 at 10:03 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5475964f1d333
You forgot the -TR.
Being a sock puppet yourself, you would say that.
June 15th, 2006 at 1:41 am - IP Man-Hash: 253b5fb75cfa1
Ahh the bullshit starts once again.
June 15th, 2006 at 2:23 am - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
No.
When you’re going to be pedantic, and smarter than everyone else, it actually helps if you are correct.
In this case, as the topic introduced by you was:
the relevant issue was the switch from a diagnosis of MPD one of DID, which occurred with DSM-IV, not DSM-IV-TR.
This is your own field, and your own topic, and your words blow up in your face that badly? Pity.
At no charge, here is wolfe’s guide on how women can correct people:
1. Is the person you are trying to correct a man? If so, go to step 9.
2. Are you being polite? If not, go to step 9.
3. Are you inebriated or high? If so, go to step 9.
4. Are you suffering from “female problems”? If so, go to step 9.
5. Are you correct? If not, go to step 9.
6. Are you sure about (5)? If not, go to step 9.
7. Are you female? If so, go to step 9.
8. Are you posting on mabtw.com? If so, go to step 9.
9. Stop immediately, go put your head under a pillow, sleep for 12 hours and start again tomorrow at step 1.
The idea of me being a sock puppet is one of the more risible ones going, coming from Fem/Carmen/Female/Female Mk2/Guest/Digby/Whatever.
If you were better at spotting patterns, you’d be better at figuring out that no man here is a sock puppet.
-wolfe
June 15th, 2006 at 3:17 am - IP Man-Hash: 442ae7cfaf56b
Fem who ?
Well stated Wolfe.
Here is the another example of “Affirmative Action”. Another fine example of the selfish bitches hard at “work” !
What a class act these selfish females really are.
No honour
No Class
and
Definitely, no Dignity.
June 15th, 2006 at 6:33 am - IP Man-Hash: eadd56da2c7c9
In her defense, wolfe, she is posting on a page titled “The Sisterhood of Dumbness”.
-Big Al
June 15th, 2006 at 8:59 am - IP Man-Hash: ed8b4eb7d4be8
That is completely brilliant. Women should be taught this every day from grade 1 through college.
-Dick
August 18th, 2006 at 8:55 am - IP Man-Hash: 0d17ac160ff85
Good for you, Wolf.
Chris
January 27th, 2008 at 7:11 pm - IP Man-Hash: b1399fe97d1bb
I still stand by my thoughts that the guy who made this site got dropped on his head when he was a kid. Either that, or women have dumped him in the past and now he has this narrow-minded view that all women are evil. I’m leaving now.
This site sucks and is not worth my time.
January 27th, 2008 at 7:39 pm - IP Man-Hash: 0a379370a5fd8
I stand on my exceptionally large Penis to point you in not only the direction of the Man-Door on the left, but your ability to not shut the fuck up, which even my dog can do on occasion.
You suck, and you are not worth the $10 I paid last time……
January 27th, 2008 at 8:26 pm - IP Man-Hash: 55548152be297
10$??????
Get a refund King.
- Sgt. Reyes
January 28th, 2008 at 6:11 am - IP Man-Hash: 0a379370a5fd8
Sorry, I didn’t mean American or Euro, I meant some shit like Rupies.
Had I been in Africa, I would have just given her two Roosters and a slap in the face……….