The Ubermensch

If a man is so inclined, he can learn everything he needs to know from one source: Superman. How to act, how to treat the less fortunate, how to live lies and lead double lives — it’s all there for men. That’s because Superman isn’t an alien from another planet, what he really is is the archetype for all men. Think about it.

Honor, strength, laser vision; I couldn’t pick three words that would better describe a man. That’s from Superman. Know what else is from Superman? Men are better than women.

I know what none of you men are thinking: “You can’t compare Superman to all women and say men are better than women! That’s stupid!” I know you’re not thinking that because it’s a dumb fucking thing to think. That’s a woman-type thought. No, that’s not what I’m saying, but what I will be saying requires a certain man-derstanding of literature and storytelling in all forms. That means this article needs an extra no women allowed disclaimer.

No Women Allowed.

Stories of epic proportion require balance or else you end up with some womanly thing of no importance or value — like that chick-flick Something’s Gotta Give. Man that thing is a piece of shit. In the Superman mythos, the balance is as follows. Superman is good; Lex Luthor is evil. Superman is wise and experienced; Jimmy Olsen is naïve but respectful and willing to learn. There is a synergy there and lessons there that all men can draw from; good or bad. Finally, the most important pairing: Superman is a man; Lois Lane is a woman.

It’s perfect. First of all, any man has about as good a chance of being a flying, cape-wearing alien with the ability to spin the world in reverse as any woman has of being a competent, confident career woman who doesn’t stick her foot down her throat when all that’s required is a “Yes please” and “Thank you. I’ll have another”.

While Lois Lane is a successful woman, just like in real life, it means she’s also a raving bitch. Lois Lane is an attention whore and a single-minded maniac who constantly sticks her nose and feet where they don’t belong and usually ends up costing Superman huge chunks of his time pulling her ass out of the fire and her head out of her ass. In that amount of time, thousands of people die in catastrophes and genocides all over the world. Does that stop her? No.

Fuck everyone else. As long as I get my piece of the corporate pie Greater Good be damned. That’s a female trait if I’ve ever heard one. Women constantly sell out their children and families lusting after the vaulted status of Career Woman — which usually just means sitting behind a desk in real estate and shuffling papers. That’s probably called equality in sewing circles and book clubs, but in my world it’s called a dead-end job and a fucking waste of time. Women have as much place in careers as does the letter q. Do you see a q in career?

The most valuable lesson of all is that just like all men, Superman has only one weakness: kryptonite. If there’s no kryptonite about, Superman is a badass no-nonsense ass kicker who doesn’t take any kind of guff. Men are exactly the same, except that instead of kryptonite it’s anal and (surprisingly to women) not constant bitching and obligations. Women are just too stupid to think outside the box.

Related Articles:

RSS feed | Trackback URI

69 Comments in 69 threads.»

Comment by sonyad
2007-04-20 07:09:30

Misogynistic block quotes are oppressing her.

 
Comment by Durrr
2007-04-20 05:23:48

Human said:

“Human I’d tell you to change your name to primate but you’re not even capable of entry level tool use and hunting.”

Then how am I typing, and how do I dismiss your insult so easily?

“You’re only capable of living off your daddy or husbands money and taking exotic vacations on it “because”.”

Well, you never asked me, so you have the misfortune of knowing that I make my own salary (an incredibly flexible one at that), and I have no interest in marriage at all. I work hard at what I do, and I take the money I earn and enjoy it by going places.

“Have a look at http://www.powerseductionandwar.com - this topic however, is very dominated by men, and i honestly doubt it will interest you.”

All information interests me. Thank you for the link.

Hurrr durrr durr. Teh quoting is hrad for meeee. ~Human.

 
Comment by Human
2007-03-26 12:31:29

“Human I’d tell you to change your name to primate but you’re not even capable of entry level tool use and hunting.”

Then how am I typing, and how do I dismiss your insult so easily?

“You’re only capable of living off your daddy or husbands money and taking exotic vacations on it “because”.”

Well, you never asked me, so you have the misfortune of knowing that I make my own salary (an incredibly flexible one at that), and I have no interest in marriage at all. I work hard at what I do, and I take the money I earn and enjoy it by going places.

“Have a look at http://www.powerseductionandwar.com - this topic however, is very dominated by men, and i honestly doubt it will interest you.”

All information interests me. Thank you for the link.

 
Comment by Necroswordsman
2007-03-26 11:10:34

dalsgaard said:

I think you’ll enjoy this particular quote from Robert Greenes blog:

To get rid of war, to fight for justice, or any cause requires strategy. To really know strategy, you have to have some acquaintance with warfare, where strategic thinking is raised to its highest levels. If you are not interested in strategy that means you are not really interested in results, because you cannot move from theory into action without some kind of strategic bridge. That means you are really only interested in the sound of your own voice. You want people to think you are for all the right things. Appearances are all you care for. And I declare a great war on all such types. The anti-manipulators are those who somehow claim exemption from the very human need and impulse to manipulate in some way. And those who deny this are generally the biggest manipulators of them all.

- Robert Greene, 1959-??

I did. Thanks.

 
Comment by dalsgaard
2007-03-26 09:35:35

Human said:

“The anti-manipulators are those who somehow claim exemption from the very human need and impulse to manipulate in some way. And those who deny this are generally the biggest manipulators of them all.”

Thank you for finding this quote, Dalsgaard.

If you want to learn more about human beings in general, and the practical employment of power, strategy, and seduction in social settings - I can highly recommend Robert Greenes books.

Have a look at http://www.powerseductionandwar.com - this topic however, is very dominated by men, and i honestly doubt it will interest you.

 
Comment by son of the suns
2007-03-26 09:33:15

Human I’d tell you to change your name to primate but you’re not even capable of entry level tool use and hunting.

You’re only capable of living off your daddy or husbands money and taking exotic vacations on it “because”.

Change your name to useless tick.

 
Comment by Human
2007-03-26 08:17:22

“Notice the sixth word of the phrase and take to heart. Take your time. Read as many times as necessary.”

Yeah, I know. But ‘man’ as in mankind. Star Trek has reformed even itself, and stresses discord to gender on opinionated matters.

 
Comment by sonyad
2007-03-26 03:33:59

Human said:
“Too much star trek.”

Right on the dot, Necroswordsman! Haha, you got me. Now it’s your turn! What’s your input?

http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/385400.html

Notice the sixth word of the phrase and take to heart. Take your time. Read as many times as necessary.

 
Comment by Human
2007-03-25 16:49:44

“The anti-manipulators are those who somehow claim exemption from the very human need and impulse to manipulate in some way. And those who deny this are generally the biggest manipulators of them all.”

Thank you for finding this quote, Dalsgaard.

 
Comment by dalsgaard
2007-03-25 16:35:05

Necroswordsman said:
I love this site because there’s hardly any bullshit on it. Well, the articles. The comments are mostly bullshit. And I know what you’re doing. So you failed. You know why?

A true manipulatist does not make it look like he is manipulating someone.

I think you’ll enjoy this particular quote from Robert Greenes blog:

To get rid of war, to fight for justice, or any cause requires strategy. To really know strategy, you have to have some acquaintance with warfare, where strategic thinking is raised to its highest levels. If you are not interested in strategy that means you are not really interested in results, because you cannot move from theory into action without some kind of strategic bridge. That means you are really only interested in the sound of your own voice. You want people to think you are for all the right things. Appearances are all you care for. And I declare a great war on all such types. The anti-manipulators are those who somehow claim exemption from the very human need and impulse to manipulate in some way. And those who deny this are generally the biggest manipulators of them all.

- Robert Greene, 1959-??

 
Comment by Necroswordsman
2007-03-25 16:20:35

Human said:

“Too much star trek.”

Right on the dot, Necroswordsman! Haha, you got me. Now it’s your turn! What’s your input?

I love this site because there’s hardly any bullshit on it. Well, the articles. The comments are mostly bullshit. And I know what you’re doing. So you failed. You know why?

A true manipulatist does not make it look like he is manipulating someone.

 
Comment by dalsgaard
2007-03-25 15:55:28

Human said:

“Too much star trek.”

Right on the dot, Necroswordsman! Haha, you got me. Now it’s your turn! What’s your input?

His input is that your words are empty, and cliché. Just like i told you.

 
Comment by Human
2007-03-25 15:02:46

“Too much star trek.”

Right on the dot, Necroswordsman! Haha, you got me. Now it’s your turn! What’s your input?

 
Comment by Necroswordsman
2007-03-25 14:45:04

Human said:

“O, o, ok here is a question. What is your point? What is your point of
Existence: To live long and prosper! To seek new life, and new civilizations! To boldly go where no human has gone before!

Too much star trek.

 
Comment by Human
2007-03-25 14:40:13

“O, o, ok here is a question. What is your point? What is your point of coming on here? What is your point of existence? What is your point for living?”

My point: I’m bored.
Coming on here: I’m -very- bored. I need a challenge.
Existence: To live long and prosper! To seek new life, and new civilizations! To boldly go where no human has gone before! … Which is impossible due to technology, but hey, we’re getting there!
Living: To bother people for information! To pose you a question! To run around the block giving people a little dance! Something like that. Or oh! I’ve never been to Nepal. I must see Nepal. Want to come along? What are you doing next Tuesday?

I’m being sarcastic about bringing you to Nepal with me, but still, you know? It’s fun gaining information. It’s full of novelties and surprises and answers questions… It’s just -more fun- than going blah blah blah every day. My teeth are meant to chew on a steak, not hiss at people meandering down the street, you know? That’s not nice!

 
Comment by Necroswordsman
2007-03-24 17:53:27

Human said:

“You’re a woman. Otherwise there would be no point in keeping your gender a secret, no?”

My gender? Actually, I’m androgynous.

“I kno what Human is doing. She’s been scarred and humiliated before by someone smarter than her, so she decides to reuse all which was used against her to prove that she is superior.

I did something of the same a few years ago. That’s behind me now, but I see through it. Also, notice the ‘*smile*’ she put somewhere, trying to act like she’s made a point which can’t be argued.”

D’oh! You caught me! I do use the smile thing, but only to give a mental image. I try to put myself off as kind. I guess it’s not working, so I’ll stop. Sorry for trying to be friendly.

But I’ve never been humiliated by a smarter person. Never. Want to know why? Instead of preaching jargon, I’ve been asking questions, and gaining information. It’s just easier to do. That way, I’m never humiliated. I ask away. How are you doing today? What do you do for a hobby? How’s your family? What is your stand on this matter? That sort of thing. It’s on the Internet where I take my data and put it to use, because it’s full of interesting topics. I’m no expert, but I love posing them questions!

O, o, ok here is a question. What is your point? What is your point of coming on here? What is your point of existence? What is your point for living?

 
Comment by sonyad
2007-03-24 17:49:44

Female said:

Ditto.
If the sun were to revolve around the earth then this would mean…that the earth’s mass would have to be much larger than the sun. I’m pretty sure.

Nicely done, Female! You get a cookie.

You can teach an old dog new tricks!
___
Hydralysk, if no one’s seen it fit to comprehensibly engage your contorted puerile rants it’s really not because you aren’t trying hard enough. It’s because they don’t care. Go away.

And drop the hermaphrodite angle. It’s getting just a tad old. Others have trolled here before, you know? Cough… some still do.

I wonder if that msrtool is at all worth its salt.

- Fatboy Slim - Sunset(Radioedit)

 
Comment by Human
2007-03-24 17:05:09

“You’re a woman. Otherwise there would be no point in keeping your gender a secret, no?”

My gender? Actually, I’m androgynous.

“I kno what Human is doing. She’s been scarred and humiliated before by someone smarter than her, so she decides to reuse all which was used against her to prove that she is superior.

I did something of the same a few years ago. That’s behind me now, but I see through it. Also, notice the ‘*smile*’ she put somewhere, trying to act like she’s made a point which can’t be argued.”

D’oh! You caught me! I do use the smile thing, but only to give a mental image. I try to put myself off as kind. I guess it’s not working, so I’ll stop. Sorry for trying to be friendly.

But I’ve never been humiliated by a smarter person. Never. Want to know why? Instead of preaching jargon, I’ve been asking questions, and gaining information. It’s just easier to do. That way, I’m never humiliated. I ask away. How are you doing today? What do you do for a hobby? How’s your family? What is your stand on this matter? That sort of thing. It’s on the Internet where I take my data and put it to use, because it’s full of interesting topics. I’m no expert, but I love posing them questions!

 
Comment by Female
2007-03-24 17:03:36

Ditto.
If the sun were to revolve around the earth then this would mean…that the earth’s mass would have to be much larger than the sun. I’m pretty sure.

 
Comment by sonyad
2007-03-24 16:56:05

Top of the morning to you.
What kind of a question is that? Fine. Decrease, obviously.

Female, if the Sun were to suddenly revolve around the Earth instead of presenting some negligible wobble, would it mean that the Earth’s mass were now larger, slighter or equivalent to that of the Sun?

- Hydra - Affinity (Thrillseekers Vocal Mix)

 
Comment by Female
2007-03-24 16:43:38

Sonyad, if the reproductive functions of the sexes were reversed, so that men were the ones that fell pregnant, do you believe that the abortion rate would increase, decrease or be somewhat equivalent to what it currently is for women in the western world?

 
Comment by Necroswordsman
2007-03-24 14:33:38

sonyad said:

I believe that’s more than can be said of her.

Lmao.

 
Comment by sonyad
2007-03-24 14:28:45

Necroswordsman said:

I kno what Human is doing.[...]

I believe that’s more than can be said of her.

- Redd Square & Lacey - In Your Hands (Mix)

 
Comment by sonyad
2007-03-24 14:26:40

Dr Z said:

http://en.allexperts.com/q/Wild-Animals-705/Animals-kill-young.htm

I see. I stand corrected.
I suppose even the purported motives for this could also be construed as convenience, aligned to simple creatures with behaviour ruled by deeply ingrained instinct (as opposed to reason) whose sole objective in life is the biological imperative to mate as often as is physiologically practical and see as many of their young into self sufficiency (or perhaps sexual maturity) as possible.

You’ll notice, however, that the fast majority of infanticides (I see fit to include abhortion numbers) are performed exclusively by women.

Further, it’s only socially acceptable to curtail intrauterine life.

Thus, the parallel with the male lions (and other species) killing offspring sired by reproductive competitors is clearly flawed.

But it’s obvious I’m grasping at straws here.
I hereby admit animals are at most only as good as women when it comes to killing their young.

I take it I was spot on regarding the amefuto issue?

- Redd Square & Lacey - In Your Hands (Mix)

 
Comment by Necroswordsman
2007-03-24 13:12:27

I kno what Human is doing. She’s been scarred and humiliated before by someone smarter than her, so she decides to reuse all which was used against her to prove that she is superior.

I did something of the same a few years ago. That’s behind me now, but I see through it. Also, notice the ‘*smile*’ she put somewhere, trying to act like she’s made a point which can’t be argued.

 
Comment by Clitn
2007-03-24 11:46:07

Uh… I never mentioned my gender, Billy. And, apparently, you’re not a woman, so how would you know? You don’t exactly put yourself in their shoes.

You’re a woman. Otherwise there would be no point in keeping your gender a secret, no?

 
Comment by Human
2007-03-24 09:41:52

Billy said:

No women allowed is on the front page.
But women always go where they not welcome. It’s your duty to be a pain in the ass huh! Sure that’s what it means to be a woman.

Uh… I never mentioned my gender, Billy. And, apparently, you’re not a woman, so how would you know? You don’t exactly put yourself in their shoes.

 
Comment by Necroswordsman
2007-03-24 08:39:51

Female said:

Just like there is no polite way to behave like a stupid misogynist jerk.

And when we see someone like that, we’ll tell them.

 
Comment by Female
2007-03-24 00:23:20

Order said:

There is no “polite” way to behave like a bitch.

Just like there is no polite way to behave like a stupid misogynist jerk.

 
Comment by Billy
2007-03-23 20:58:21

Human said:

“NO women allowed.”

You shouldn’t have said that. Avoiding her questions means you have no answer. Haha!

No women allowed is on the front page.
But women always go where they not welcome. It’s your duty to be a pain in the ass huh! Sure that’s what it means to be a woman.

 
Comment by Necroswordsman
2007-03-23 20:33:02

Human said:

“NO women allowed.”

You shouldn’t have said that. Avoiding her questions means you have no answer. Haha!

Ahem. Who the FUCK are you?

Just a thought.

 
 
Comment by sonyad
2007-03-23 18:43:50

Female said:

e v i l e d d y said:

Leave.. or I’m starting a movement where men take their morning dumps in the female washroom.

Yea, good luck with that. Most men have evolved past the primate stage but if you personally feel the need to regress then all the best finding yourself new employment fast.

As opposed to women? That is, if a piece of some pig jaw unearthed in Nevada is compelling evidence for our primeval primate ascendence to you. I wager it is.

Call me ‘patriarchal oppressor’ but I don’t see the females of any species but humans kill their own young. Mostly during intrauterine lifes but further along as well. Loving, life engendering and nurturing gender my ass…

I’ll gladly hand this to Ma’ Nature; no abortion clinics around in the Amazonian jungle. At least not ’til Greer and her ilk moved in lamenting about the inherent oppression of said state of affaris.

 
Comment by abaddon_fff
2007-03-23 17:06:58

Order,
I agree wholeheartedly with your post. In my view women have no IDEA of what they want, and if they did, how to get there. They cannot make decisions, and so for the most part ask a Man to make decisions for them. Then if that decision goes wrong, they blame the Man for it. Its truly saddening to see, how Feminism, has treated women.

-Strength and Honor-

 
Comment by Order
2007-03-23 15:13:46

There is no “polite” way to behave like a bitch. The only “distrustful and manipulative” people on this site are women who don’t read the rules.There may be atleast 1, maybe 2 punks on this site who look for trouble just for the sake, which is not the right way to act like a man. Perhaps not exactly all the women in the world are cheating whores. But you can’t tell with the kind of women who post on this site. Their flare for a dramatic brigade of endless bullshit rises, even though they have no problem generalizing men as being nothing more than controlling, disgusting patriarchs who oppress any sense of “Equality for women.” And since we all know women can’t handle the truth well, they erupt like volcanos and spew shit about men pertaining to the Oedipus Complex, penis envy, childhood abuse, etc. For these reasons, they themselves can validate that yes indeed “all women are cheating whores” though there will be those who claim that men’s raging hormones exist to deflower some poor helpless cunt, since these hard headed female fools try and relate sex and rape as the same damn thing. And for those women who aren’t whores, they just haven’t reached that point yet.

 
Comment by e v i l e d d y
2007-03-23 14:48:46

If women were truely equal to men.. we should be allowed to defecate in yer precious room.

Yer a fecal sexist!

 
Comment by Female
2007-03-23 14:09:31

e v i l e d d y said:

Leave.. or I’m starting a movement where men take their morning dumps in the female washroom.

Yea, good luck with that. Most men have evolved past the primate stage but if you personally feel the need to regress then all the best finding yourself new employment fast.

 
Comment by Human
2007-03-23 13:45:43

“NO women allowed.”

You shouldn’t have said that. Avoiding her questions means you have no answer. Haha!

 
Comment by e v i l e d d y
2007-03-23 13:06:46

NO women allowed.

Leave.. or I’m starting a movement where men take their morning dumps in the female washroom.

 
Comment by Female
2007-03-23 13:03:55

Female said:

Why don’t you tell me what exactly this site is all about then. I admit that ignoring the sign on the door isn’t very respectful of me, but then I find it hard to show respect to statements such as “all women are cheating whores.” Tell me why I shouldn’t find that statement ignorant, annoying and rude, regardless of whether it is mean to be funny.

Order said:I don’t see why I should answer that since the answers are all over the site, but much like that sign, a lot seems to slip past your mind. This site is about the inefficiencies of women who have a narrow minded view of what their rights truly are, which would also lead to Feminism,

You’re telling me I shouldn’t find the statement that “all women are cheating whores” insulting based on the fact that I shouldn’t be reading this website? K. But tell me, is it still an insulting statement, or can it only become insulting if a woman reads it? Is it insulting if a man says it to you in private or only if he walks up to your mother and says it to her face?

Similarly, if women privately call men cheating bastards who are biologically incapable of being faithful, is that rude? Is it fact? Is it rude if a women doesn’t say it to you but behaves towards you in such a way that all her behaviours towards you are based on this belief? Or is the latter merely being polite? Sure, it’s controlling, but it’s polite, which according to your logic must make it A-okay. Whatever you don’t know won’t hurt you, right? Personally, I think it is distrustful and manipulative, which is pretty much how I see the men’s attitudes and behaviours on this site towards the female posters. I find it very sad. You don’t believe me, but I do.

 
Comment by sonyad
2007-03-23 09:23:35

Not that they aren’t.

 
Comment by Necroswordsman
2007-03-23 09:16:05

Female said:

Yes, and I’m also right more often than not.

Obviously delusional.

Dakota Smith said:

Your call, but me, I only engage her for some level of amusement any more, and even that is losing its attracting. Near as I can tell, she honestly believes that she’s disproving the basic tenet of the site, while any objective reader can see that she’s proving it.

Hit the nail on the head.

 
Comment by Dakota Smith
2007-03-23 06:55:37

Just FYI to the newcomers: Female’s a long-time pathological poster to this site. There’s really no sense in engaging her, though it generally takes engaging her for a while to realize the futility.

Your call, but me, I only engage her for some level of amusement any more, and even that is losing its attracting. Near as I can tell, she honestly believes that she’s disproving the basic tenet of the site, while any objective reader can see that she’s proving it.

It’s kind of how I assume rational American Conservatives feel about Anne Coulter: they wish she’d shut up, because her rabid inanities only provide ammunition for the opposition to accuse them of being insane.

 
Comment by Order
2007-03-23 06:50:31

Men know when women want to get on our good side. A deafening cry for a blowjob is one way to tell.

Really, I thought you all believed that women hate sex and giving bjs and that the only time a woman does either is because she wants cash, because all woman are apparently just whores.

You practically backed up what I said right there.

But the women who post on this site and “abuse other women” are not abusing anything that isn’t the truth.

What truth?

The simple fact that men are better than women. Women are annoying and complain about everything. Hence why technically they’re not allowed on this site. Men try to share concrete facts with other men and then a woman shows up and before you know it everything has to be a power struggle.

Though you, Female, are the one “abusing women” with your lack of everything that ranges from understanding what this site is really all about, to not being able to read the “No Women Allowed” sign.

Why don’t you tell me what exactly this site is all about then. I admit that ignoring the sign on the door isn’t very respectful of me, but then I find it hard to show respect to statements such as “all women are cheating whores.” Tell me why I shouldn’t find that statement ignorant, annoying and rude, regardless of whether it is mean to be funny.

I don’t see why I should answer that since the answers are all over the site, but much like that sign, a lot seems to slip past your mind. This site is about the inefficiencies of women who have a narrow minded view of what their rights truly are, which would also lead to Feminism, a group of hideous women driven by the hatred for men through the spirit of Fascism. Men are here to display their right to free spreech, and to the truth, because unlike all these women who swear by the lie that women are oppressed, men are the ones truly getting screwed over. You’ll never see this on your Tv at home, CNN, Fox News, or any significant news outlet. Feminists control the media and will shoot down anything that jeopardizes their way of life. You shouldn’t find anything here rude, insulting, etc, because you have no business being here anyway.

Some women actually do salvage themselves from the clutches of Feminism because they know it’s all bullshit, and most likely because these are attractive women who don’t want to get caught up in the ugly world of the Feminazi.

I’m actually not a man-hating feminist, I have gone out of my way to steer clear of reading feminist literature all through uni and I avoided the “women’s room” because I don’t like cliques with exclusionary policies, so if you imagine me to be a butch dyke feminist in birkenstocks, you are sadly mistaken. You also seem to think that feminists by definition must be ugly. Just because men who can’t keep an attractive women end up forming women-hating clubs does not meant that women do the same because of a similiar reason. There is such a thing as advocacy against injustice.

Again with the “women-hating club”. This is not a women hating site. Women are just the more dull conterpart to the man of the Homosapien species. That doen’t warrent men to hate women, it’s just the truth. And yes, feminists are ugly, but ugly! And it has nothing to do with men being unable to keep attractive women. Men can keep all kinds of women. Men know when a woman is attractive and when a woman is not, because we’re men and men have great eyes. On the other hand, all women think they’re ugly. I haven’t met a woman who hasn’t plastered shit on her face like frosting on a cake. Women have an image problem, with themselves, and because they’re so dull they don’t know how to solve it. That’s where the man comes in and makes the final call.

Yes, there is such a thing as advocacy against injustice. Hence, you can make a case that that’s what this site is about.

 
Comment by Female
2007-03-23 02:19:44

Men know when women want to get on our good side. A deafening cry for a blowjob is one way to tell.

Really, I thought you all believed that women hate sex and giving bjs and that the only time a woman does either is because she wants cash, because all woman are apparently just whores.

But the women who post on this site and “abuse other women” are not abusing anything that isn’t the truth.

What truth?

Though you, Female, are the one “abusing women” with your lack of everything that ranges from understanding what this site is really all about, to not being able to read the “No Women Allowed” sign.

Why don’t you tell me what exactly this site is all about then. I admit that ignoring the sign on the door isn’t very respectful of me, but then I find it hard to show respect to statements such as “all women are cheating whores.” Tell me why I shouldn’t find that statement ignorant, annoying and rude, regardless of whether it is mean to be funny.

Some women actually do salvage themselves from the clutches of Feminism because they know it’s all bullshit, and most likely because these are attractive women who don’t want to get caught up in the ugly world of the Feminazi.

I’m actually not a man-hating feminist, I have gone out of my way to steer clear of reading feminist literature all through uni and I avoided the “women’s room” because I don’t like cliques with exclusionary policies, so if you imagine me to be a butch dyke feminist in birkenstocks, you are sadly mistaken. You also seem to think that feminists by definition must be ugly. Just because men who can’t keep an attractive women end up forming women-hating clubs does not meant that women do the same because of a similiar reason. There is such a thing as advocacy against injustice.

 
Comment by Order
2007-03-22 22:14:52

I simply prove that the men on this site are not better than women, for when a woman enters here she is abused. Or, you get the really sad cases, those women who also ignore the “No Women Allowed” sign, but who still enter simply to abuse other women so they can get on the good side of men. Pathetic.

Men know when women want to get on our good side. A deafening cry for a blowjob is one way to tell. But the women who post on this site and “abuse other women” are not abusing anything that isn’t the truth. Though you, Female, are the one “abusing women” with your lack of everything that ranges from understanding what this site is really all about, to not being able to read the “No Women Allowed” sign. Some women actually do salvage themselves from the clutches of Feminism because they know it’s all bullshit, and most likely because these are attractive women who don’t want to get caught up in the ugly world of the Feminazi.

 
Comment by Female
2007-03-22 18:59:01

dalsgaard said:

So there’s nothing on this site that you agree with?

Not much. Actually, absolutely nothing if I am to apply the descriptions of women given here, to myself or my own life.

 
Comment by Female
2007-03-22 18:49:15

Yes, and I’m also right more often than not.

 
Comment by BlackMage
2007-03-22 18:28:02

Female said:

Think harder.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foil_(literature)

I simply prove that the men on this site are not better than women, for when a woman enters here she is abused. Or, you get the really sad cases, those women who also ignore the “No Women Allowed” sign, but who still enter simply to abuse other women so they can get on the good side of men. Pathetic.

You’re funny. Did you know that?

 
Comment by dalsgaard
2007-03-22 18:25:06

Female said:

Think harder.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foil_(literature)

I simply prove that the men on this site are not better than women, for when a woman enters here she is abused. Or, you get the really sad cases, those women who also ignore the “No Women Allowed” sign, but who still enter simply to abuse other women so they can get on the good side of men. Pathetic.

So there’s nothing on this site that you agree with?

 
Comment by Female
2007-03-22 18:18:33

Think harder.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foil_(literature)

I simply prove that the men on this site are not better than women, for when a woman enters here she is abused. Or, you get the really sad cases, those women who also ignore the “No Women Allowed” sign, but who still enter simply to abuse other women so they can get on the good side of men. Pathetic.

 
Comment by BlackMage
2007-03-22 18:04:16

Female said:

You mean the satire? No, I don’t miss that, but you have clearly missed the fact that most posters here (including myself) are actually abusive, rather than satirical. Have a nice day being wrong.

FIXED

 
Comment by Female
2007-03-22 17:55:23

You mean the satire? No, I don’t miss that, but you have clearly missed the fact that most posters here (including yourself) are actually abusive, rather than satirical. Have a nice day being wrong.

 
Comment by BlackMage
2007-03-22 17:26:58

Female said:

Just what is that supposed to mean BlackMage? You seem to believe that you can see inside my mind and comprehend both what I can see and what I cannot see. Here’s some advice for you, you cannot. Don’t presume to think you can understand me simply from reading some of my comments. The internet cannot adequately substitute for real interaction.

You completely miss the point of this site.

The complete disregard for “No women allowed” either means you can’t read or you choose not to (both equally sad).

You take everything here far too seriously and really cause nothing more than getting people to laugh at you.

You’re pathetic and hilarious. Please, continue making a spectacle of yourself here, it amuses me to no end.

 
Comment by Female
2007-03-22 17:15:16

Just what is that supposed to mean BlackMage? You seem to believe that you can see inside my mind and comprehend both what I can see and what I cannot see. Here’s some advice for you, you cannot. Don’t presume to think you can understand me simply from reading some of my comments. The internet cannot adequately substitute for real interaction.

 
Comment by BlackMage
2007-03-22 13:30:17

Female said:

A bunch of useless woman-talk.

I wonder if Female will ever truly learn to read…

 
Comment by Wolfe
2007-02-06 14:51:58

Of course she married afterwards. To a man with money. Like most women. So be it.

-wolfe

 
Comment by Billy
2007-02-03 18:09:50

Wolfe said:

@Dan (not that he’s here to see it): True, but the fish + bicycle analogy was a nice play on Gloria Steinem’s famous comment about men. Or so I thought.

-wolfe

Only for the old hag to turn on her word and prove that skanky old fish do ride a bicyles. She did marry afterwards. Not that women say anything they really mean or it’s her perogotive to change her mind. Nothing a woman says should ever be taken seriously unless they talk about murder.

 
Comment by Necroswordsman
2007-02-03 06:53:18

Dick Masterson said:

Heroine? It’s spelled heroin. The other one doesn’t exist.

-Dick

Heh, a name for a female superhero is the same as a drug. Coincidence?

 
Comment by Wolfe
2007-02-03 06:36:01

@Dan (not that he’s here to see it): True, but the fish + bicycle analogy was a nice play on Gloria Steinem’s famous comment about men. Or so I thought.

-wolfe

 
Comment by Billy
2007-02-03 02:15:19

Women can’t judge man points. Sheesh. You are not thinking again!
Female proving once again she has penis envy.

 
Comment by sonyad
2007-02-02 15:14:15

Who’s geezer?

- Teriyaki Boyz - Tokyo Drift (Fast & Furious)

 
Comment by diamatik
2007-02-01 19:00:44

Female said:
Massive loss of Man Points from you both I’m afraid.

Women, must you desecrate everything?

 
Comment by Dan
2005-12-20 10:03:06

wolfe, more like me telling the tides to stop rising and falling. It has no effect and the ocean doesn’t give the slightest fuck.

 
Comment by Dick Masterson
2005-12-20 08:25:39

Heroine? It’s spelled heroin. The other one doesn’t exist.

-Dick

 
Comment by wolfe
2005-12-20 07:50:53

Seeing a woman trying to allocate man points is like seeing a fish trying to ride a bicycle.
-wolfe

 
Comment by Female
2005-12-20 03:24:58

I can’t believe you guys both used a big flowery term such as “Knight In Shining Armour” when geezer could just have said “hero.” The correct analogue would of course then be heroine. Massive loss of Man Points from you both I’m afraid.

 
Comment by Dick Masterson
2005-12-12 18:26:55

What’s the female analogue of a “Knight in Shining Armour”? A woman who keeps her mouth shut.

-Dick

 
Comment by Oldone
2005-12-12 17:53:43

Excellent point. Another example of this is the fact that people in general are looking for more of what is commonly called a “Knight In Shining Armor.” You never hear anyone saying”Gee,I wish we had more whining, nagging, self-centered, unreliable, overly emotional attention whores in this world.”

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment may take some time to appear.