Comments on: The Wife Contract. Absolute Perfection

By: a*******

a******* — Sat, 19 Feb 2011 16:39:54 +0000

ohhh you men are contradicting yourselves. You say women are hating on gays? look whos doing the homophobic name calling as well? ^^^^ Its not called being stepped n your moron, Its called being in Love. The only woman that only loves you is your mother.

By: BITCH on a missionl, not to the kitchen

BITCH on a missionl, not to the kitchen — Sat, 19 Feb 2011 16:34:13 +0000

If someone loves you, you dont need to make a contract telling them to do shit for you.. Apparantly dick, and men who agree with this dont

By: Private Eyes

Private Eyes — Sat, 13 Nov 2010 07:54:01 +0000

@TheRiPtIdE
Sorry, I’m not into your sick fetish of anal play. And why the hell would we want to meet your GF? Another point, who would kiss the ass of of a “guy” who likes being stepped on by a woman?

By: Frank the Tank

Frank the Tank — Thu, 10 Jun 2010 20:53:52 +0000

Men do not obsess over women. We’re too goddamn busy doing manly shit, like building cities, making trains run on time, and researching a fucking cure for fucking cancer. Men who obsess about women are a fiction, invented by a woman, and not a very good fiction at that. It is a social tool designed to try to control men.

The only reason Dick and my fellow men-at-arms even take the time to build a site like this, is because women won’t stop fucking up our cities, slowing down our trains, and being the cancer of all of humanity. This is because women will NEVER DO WHAT THEY ARE TOLD! God told the woman not to eat from the tree of wisdom. Maybe that bitch Pandora should have kept that goddamn box shut. At least men create terrible things than can also be used for good, like nuclear power. Women can only create things that Always lead to misery for both men and women. Without fail, and without exception.

So, follow the damn rules, and don’t come to this site. but you, like all women, fail to follow simple instructions, and came here anyways. You have already proven my point.

By: Raj7

Raj7 — Sat, 27 Feb 2010 07:30:00 +0000

To the lesbian below.I havent met your gf.Now go be a gay feminist bitch somewhere else.

By: Bob

Bob — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:00:20 +0000

“We’re out there…we women who aren’t bitches…”

I’d like to know what your definition of the word “bitch” is. You’re a prime candidate for the “bitch” tag in my book.

You’re an insolent cunt who comes on a website for men, spouting a bunch of bullshit, calling men “stupid”, and then you want to pretend you’re not a bitch?

By: samantha mo

samantha mo — Sun, 26 Apr 2009 21:23:48 +0000

I want to! I want to! Ooh ooh pick me!!
Hehehe I love this website. Pretty much everything on it is ironically true because of the low level of consciousness of 96% of humanity. But we 4% do exist though! We’re out there…we women who aren’t bitches…
But yeah..I like being a slave :D Most of the men on here have a very sexy mindset, but it’s not very intellectually appealing. What a pickle.

By: TheRiPtIdE

TheRiPtIdE — Sat, 28 Feb 2009 04:56:43 +0000

BITCH! have you met my gf? she makes more than me! do you have a Girlfriend?! dude you can kiss my fucking ass

By: Muzalon

Muzalon — Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:35:01 +0000

It is in fact predicted in most scripture.

By: DallyWama

DallyWama — Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:25:24 +0000

Thanks Dick. This is actually therapeutic. I love to vent my frustrations about women. I actually get along well with women who are not insecure feminists. However, feminists need to be rounded up like cattle and sent to Afghanistan. That is after I give them a spanking for being the naughty little whores they are. Hows that for therapy hillary?

By: Hillary

Hillary — Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:15:27 +0000

I’m a psychologist; this is some great info on gender differences.
Who knew that men and women would become so hostile to one another, so hostile that they cannot remember what it truly means to be connected, and in love, and valued by one another.

By: Joseph James Frantz

Joseph James Frantz — Fri, 23 Jan 2009 01:22:56 +0000

Chris, definitely check out the Irish Brehon Laws. You might dig them. A woman could NOT scream rape if she agreed to “go behind the bushes” with a man, meaning she consented. NOT EVEN if she changed her mind in the middle and he did not stop. She could accuse someone of rape but if it proved false, she could accuse NO ONE ELSE ever again.

Good shit there.

By: Chris

Chris — Fri, 23 Jan 2009 01:11:54 +0000

•••• “However, I take it a step further, the one that tries to FORCE THE OTHER via the courts to abandon their children, or REFUSES visitation, should not get custody.” •••••

Yes! THEN there would be justice in the world.

By: Joseph James Frantz

Joseph James Frantz — Fri, 23 Jan 2009 01:11:40 +0000

If you want to see some JUST divorce laws Google Brehon Laws (Fenechas in Gaeilge). And THOSE are the laws that I agree with, not to mention the culture.

Which is why I am so OPPOSED to feminism. Feminism requires that women be EMPOWERED. Which means power given, thus stolen from another. Whereas Irish women were always just a source of power on their own, no NEED to be empowered or ENTITLED.

By: Joseph James Frantz

Joseph James Frantz — Fri, 23 Jan 2009 01:09:04 +0000

keikori, LOTS and LOTS of reading. Divorce statistics are prevalent though, and should be easy for you to find.

Another interesting one, regarding deadbeat fathers. Studies have found that when visitation is ENFORCED, child support payments reach between 80% and 90% compliance. What’s that tell you about so called dead beat dads?

Glad to see you agree with the last one. A lot of women though disagree with you and me and think it is perfectly justifiable to charge a father more than he earns for child support, then require that he pays that amount while he is in jail for lack of payment, where now his income is ZERO.

That is an example of what I mean when I say that women live in a fantasy world. You are SLIGHTLY this side of reality. When you are kneeling at your 1′s feet, then you might be a bit more over the line into the real world.

By: Chris

Chris — Fri, 23 Jan 2009 01:06:32 +0000

(that 85% came from a female attorney who actually told ME the situation for Men is totally unacceptable. She is ASHAMED for woman across America. She said easily 4/5 women are THAT heartless in divorce court)

By: Chris

Chris — Fri, 23 Jan 2009 01:03:36 +0000

Talk to any DIVORCE ATTORNEY.

85% of women in divorce court will openly declare they “NEVER ACTUALLY LOVED THEIR HUSBANDS’.

By: keikori

keikori — Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:59:47 +0000

May I ask where you got this information from? Though i can completely agree with the last part:
“And I did not even account for the men that are jailed, because the court orders them to pay more than 100% of their income (an impossibility) for child support.”

By: Joseph James Frantz

Joseph James Frantz — Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:33:29 +0000

Ok, we agree, whoever abandons the children should have no rights. However, I take it a step further, the one that tries to FORCE THE OTHER via the courts to abandon their children, or REFUSES visitation, should not get custody.

70% of divorces are filed by women. So it’s not usually the men leaving.

88% of the time women get custody.

73% of those will interfere with court order visitation.

So you see, it’s not the men abandoning in most cases. And I did not even account for the men that are jailed, because the court orders them to pay more than 100% of their income (an impossibility) for child support.

By: keikori

keikori — Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:27:34 +0000

My apologies, I worded it wrong, I was in a bit of a hurry, but anyway, yes, it’s best for both parents to be there, but if one does happen to be missing, it’s better that the one missing is the father. I say this because if he’s missing in the first place, he has no right to care for the children or even have joint custody. However, if the woman leaves with no explanation, the man should get the child, for he cares more. To sum it all up, whoever leaves recieves no rights to the children, usually it’s the men that leave, and that’s what i was explaining above.