Three Times the Lady, Once Times the Whore

Myself and every other man on Earth have been saying it for years: alimony is fucked — and it’s extremely sexist.

But wait, what about this?

Did you know you’re liable for child support if you knock some slut up who lies about being on the pill and then doesn’t want to have an abortion because of some ridiculous shit like she suddenly has “principles” or because her mother didn’t abort her? Well you are liable for that cash cow and it’s the biggest croc of shit and injustice that could ever be imagined.

First of all, honey, you don’t do everything your mother does because you don’t swallow. And secondly, where were all these magic, money-sucking principles while you were on your back enjoying the greatest hour and a half of your life? Perhaps you were praying to a different, more easy-going God at that point — or maybe God was half as drunk as you and not paying attention. I doubt it.

Thanks to American Superman Matt Dubay, the black hole of injustice feminist blowhards and the dumbest women on Earth call “taking responsibility” will soon be put straight — as straight as a shotgun or a bunch of cowboys or every single picture frame that any man has ever hung anywhere. Men are master hangers, whereas women are merely masters at hanging onto a free ride.

A lawsuit, rightly dubbed, “Roe vs. Wade for Men”, has been filed by Mr. Dubay and the Nation Center for Men, which seeks the obvious:

Women and Child Support: Fuck You!

Whatever you think about abortion, in America it’s not illegal when it’s not illegal and that’s the bottom line — or the Man Line because that’s the line we men walk at all times. You know what else isn’t illegal in America (at least at the moment)? Eating a Snickers bar. If someone offers you a Snickers bar and you don’t want it, and then they turn out to win like a plasma TV or some jet skis in the wrapper, you’re not entitled to shit! Abortions are exactly the same.

Roe v. Wade for Men claims that since men have absolutely no choice in deciding whether a fetus is unconceived (aborted) or given up for adoption after birth, they have no legal responsibility to pay for the goddamn thing.

Is this Law for the Retarded: 101? Of fucking course that’s true. Look, here’s how the court proceedings will go:

“Have you motherfuckers ever heard of No Taxation Without Representation!?”

No, I’m joking. You can’t say motherfuckers in court.

“Your honor, guess what. If you go rent a car and opt not to tell them you’re blind, you can’t go wrecking around town like a carom and then drop a damage bill off at the car rental place with their newly renovated Renault Peugeot that now has two missing wheels and new fucking Delorean doors. It’s not their problem. It’s yours. Case closed.”

The Honorary Man of the Month for March is Matt Dubay’s lying slut of an ex-girlfriend — we’ll call her Slutarella; who is about to be thrown under the proverbial bus of her fucking lifetime in the name of men’s rights. Not equality for men man-mind you, but men’s rights. Men seeking equality is like Robert De Niro auditioning for a Star Wars film.

It’s beneath him.

A Real American Hero

Related Articles:

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

RSS feed | Trackback URI

146 Comments in 137 threads.»

Pages: [7] 6 5 4 3 2 1 » Show All

Comment by Haha89
2009-10-01 09:38:34 - IP Man-Hash: b2a3745f0d705

Chris=Mr. Empty-pants: http://www.maleenhancement.org/

Comment by Chris
2009-10-01 09:42:32 - IP Man-Hash: 0211d7d96e1c0

That’s never gonna get you laid.

 
 
Comment by Banderman
2009-09-05 08:14:11 - IP Man-Hash: bd4f7d0a3a68e

I will make a bet right now. We will not hear one freaking word from any pop tart regarding this topic. This subject matter is one that pisses me off to no end. I have never had to pay alimony, but let me tell you this, talk about women wanting their cake and eating it, too? They can eat shit. Alimony is quintessentially the most sexist and gender biased rule in divorce court that has ignored men and favored women. Women claim they can do anything a man can do. Bullshit. Women claim they can be independent and do it on their own. Bullshit. Women claim they are equal to men. Bullshit. If this were all true, women would demand that alimony be stricken from the court system. Of course, when it comes to money, women love to play ‘victim’ and ‘down trodden gender’ all while they are provided ‘protected class status’ in every other area of jurisprudence. I married a pop tart many years ago. After a year, I had had enough, told her I was going to get a divorce. Her reply? ‘You can’t get a divorce’. Of course, I asked her why. She then calmly and quite elegantly informed me that she had ‘gone off the pill without telling me and was pregnant’. I had two choices, play the game and stay married to this wench so I could have some input in my child’s life, or go ahead and get divorced and see my kid every 2 weeks, if lucky. Men are not provided equal protection under the law, no matter what. If she ‘wants’ an abortion, she can have it with NO input from the father. If she ‘wants’ to have the child, she can have it with guaranteed support payments from the father. Marrying or having children with an American woman (or one that has adopted their twisted set of ideas) is the biggest mistake any man can make in his life. They say the pretty words, make the pretty promises, but wait until push comes to shove; she will gut you like the barracuda she is. Men should adopt if they want children, have a girl friend that can be told to leave when she acts like an arrogant ass (it won’t be a very long wait). This is the non-messy solution to 21st century relationships. Rent ‘em, don’t buy ‘em. Of course, women will defend their ‘right’ to screw over a man which only makes my argument for me.

Comment by STack
2009-09-05 08:26:17 - IP Man-Hash: 0211d7d96e1c0

Brutal story. Makes some other guys eternally grateful they never learned it the hard way.

15 minutes at http://nomarriage.com and a man would have to be insane to ever get married to any snatch.

You’ll notice plenty of girls have NO IDEA how to make a man WANT to marry them – and stay married to them. They only know how to TRAP you into it.

That’s what makes them USELESS and WORTHLESS.

A kniving bitch ALSO once told me very elegantly ‘gone off the pill without telling me and was pregnant’.

PROPER MANSPONSE:

“Well then maybe you will get some of my money for child support. But you will NEVER – EVER – see me again you fucked up slag. And neither will your child. GET OUT.”

That’s what you tell a bitch like that.

When it sinks in that she will be on her own, cant’ even get a date as a single Mom (because men don’t ever date single moms), and even her husband wants nothing to do with her…. she will get an abortion – IMMEDIATELY.

She allowed herself to get pregnant ONLY TO KEEP YOU MARRIED AND CLOSE TO HER. When the cunt finds out that plan has FAILED, she will panic and lose her fucking mind.

Excellent.

Comment by STack
2009-09-05 08:29:56 - IP Man-Hash: 0211d7d96e1c0

Oh and by the way…. the one who told me she was pregnant, was actually LYING – to see what my reaction would be.

I threw her out on her ass anyway.

 
 
 
Comment by Bruce
2009-06-15 17:40:30 - IP Man-Hash: 48f31594c0228

says she’s on the pill, then she gets my allias name
we’ll see who figures out who’s lying first.

 
Comment by Senach
2009-04-10 09:31:53 - IP Man-Hash: e04a2bfa9a2e4

If the child is mine,and i am expected to pay for it,then the child should be in my care,i am a man ,i will make a better job of bringing that child up,instead some whore that was lucky enough to get my sperm,she should be grateful that i improved her offsprings bloodline.

 
Comment by Mona
2009-03-20 20:02:59 - IP Man-Hash: 115defb379b37

Women are fucking bitches

 
Comment by No Mames Buey
2009-02-04 06:44:23 - IP Man-Hash: 2ccd32c74b0f2

lying about taking birth control is a digusting epidemic in the US. It has happened to a few friends & countless friends of friends.

I have an idea for how a fair child support system would work. If you want to run this as a blog post, go right ahead & run with it.


I would say that child support should be limited to the a reasonable level of child expenses (not LAZY WOMAN expenses). Perhaps this would be $1000 a month in “child costs stamps” (CCS) that would be paid to the woman. CCS would be like food stamps, & would be government-enforced to be legal tender at any grocery, clothes retailer, dentist’s office, etc.

The remaining amount should go to a tax-free account in the CHILD’s name. At high school graduation or age 18 (whichever comes first), the child would be able to access this money for educational costs (university, community college, vocational school, etc). At age 25 the adult child would be able to access this money for purchasing a primary residency house, &/or to incorporate it into their tax free retirement account (401K, etc).

Example: some millionaire dude is charged 10K/month in child support. $1K in CCS goes to the mom, $9K goes to the child’s account.

If a women’s group would protest this plan, we could react saying this group of women are “anti-children”. They would be ethered PR-wise on that.

Comment by mannocence
2009-02-25 14:21:36 - IP Man-Hash: 9228d2368d2e9

this is an excellent idea. women often abuse the money they receive for child support and the child goes hungry. this would prevent such a thing with a bit of tweaking.

 
 
Comment by Vagrath666
2008-09-29 17:03:21 - IP Man-Hash: 8a37b6454e781

Stop not taking responsibility for your mistakes, and lack of protection and catering toward not using safety tips.

Something men oughta know, and then they blame women for neglect, yet they avoid any parental demands.

Comment by ‮
2008-10-02 15:11:47 - IP Man-Hash: ece343bb76661

Why exactly is it the mans mistake?
Especially if a women lies about taking birth control.

 
Comment by Banderman
2009-09-05 08:20:10 - IP Man-Hash: bd4f7d0a3a68e

Bull crap. The entire justification for Roe vs. Wade was that women demanded their right to control their own body. If this were true, they would control their own body before the fact of getting pregnant, not after. It’s her body, she is the person that has the greatest responsibility regarding birth control. Arguing otherwise ignores the facts and panders again to the woman’s sole point of view. Roe vs. Wade – learn the history and facts of the law before again placing equal responsibility on men. Men certainly don’t share ‘equal say’ when a child has been conceived. Women are then fully and completely in the drivers seat. Women have had their cake and eating it far too long.

 
 
Comment by doubt
2008-05-03 12:56:38 - IP Man-Hash: 21cd76a1f4c18

man killer said:

u are stupid

Oh shit!

 
Comment by man killer
2008-05-03 12:54:10 - IP Man-Hash: 2a495e47f1263

u are stupid

Comment by Banderman
2009-09-05 08:21:34 - IP Man-Hash: bd4f7d0a3a68e

You’re an idiot and not scaring us at all.

 
 
Comment by Mike Hunter
2008-03-15 19:01:17 - IP Man-Hash: 7765b29d7f59c

My dad pays child support when he doesnt have to…Why? because he is a true man…He takes care of his responsibilities.

Ahh and out comes the shaming language. Any time a woman want’s a man to do something that’s not in his interests she attacks his masculentity. You should do ___ otherwise your not “a real man”.

Women want men to “take care of their responsibilities” and then want to what “taking care of our responsibilities” entales. It usually involves sending them a lot of money. You want me to take care of my responsibilities? No problem. I’ll tell you want I’ll get sole custody of the kid and you can pay me child support. You can come by and see him when ever you want.

Oh but I forgot. According to government stat’s when women are forced to pay child support [and they almost never are] they: are ordered to pay much, much, less; become deadbeats much more often; and are much less likely to be jailed, or have their drivers license suspended for back support. So that wouldn’t work.

How about we just abolish child support. A person’s responsibilities should be proportional to their rights. And since men have no reproductive rights [eg. the ability to unilaterally discharge parental responsibility] they should have no reproductive responsibilities [being forced to pay child support].

 
Comment by Mike Hunter
2008-03-15 18:45:09 - IP Man-Hash: 7765b29d7f59c

Did you know you’re liable for child support if you knock some slut up who lies about being on the pill and then doesn’t want to have an abortion because of some ridiculous shit like she suddenly has “principles� or because her mother didn’t abort her?

Or how about being liable for child support because you knocked up some stupid slut who lied about being currently being infertile and who you later found out ALREADY HAD an abortion because she got knocked up by a pennyless ex-boyfriend. But since you’re not a lazy piece of shit and actually earn a living she all of the sudden becomes pro-choice; because she has a decent chance of getting her clutches into your earnings.

This is a simple case really. Either the ability to unilaterally discharge one’s parental responsibilities after a pregnancy has already occured is a right or it isn’t. Women can currently discharge their maternal responsibilities after a pregnancy has already occured via: abortion, adoption, or abandoment.

If you believe that you should be able to opt out of parenthood then that ‘right’ should be extended to men as well as women. If you believe that people shouldn’t be able to opt out of parenthood then it’s time to: outlaw abortion; repeal abandonment laws; and start charging women who put their child up for adoption child support to reimburse the state or adoptive couple for the cost of raising that child.

We can’t have a bunch of deadbeat moms running around now can we?

 
Comment by Wayland
2008-03-11 13:54:29 - IP Man-Hash: 3fcfc55fe89af

Is there another link to the suit?

 
Comment by Billy
2007-12-16 15:36:16 - IP Man-Hash: 8e86de744d7eb

Delia Florea said:

As long as the two have consensual unprotected sex, I find it normal that the guy will pay for the child. Of course, if she lies about being on the pill or whatever stuff like that, then yes, she shouldn’t get crap.

Also, I think women should have to justify the way they spend the child support money because I doubt a toddler wears Prada shoes for instance. But besides that it’s just common sense that both parents should contribute to the child. If you don’t like the consequences don’t have sex. If you don’t want a child as a man, don’t fuck around.

And abortion shouldn’t be used because you didn’t want to use the condom or pill. That should be if by mistake something happened or the woman got raped or something, even though there are pills for after.

And don’t bash on kristina because she has some points that are valid.

No, we should go back to the past when men kept their children and the women went home to live with Dad. Men will deal with them. But Dads don’t want these burdens returning home and governments can’t afford all the lazy women, therefore child support was created. Time for change.

 
Comment by Buddha
2007-12-16 11:15:39 - IP Man-Hash: 9b8661e6da7fc

Let’s think about the opposite scenario of the Dubai case:

Say a man and a woman both decide to have a baby and then the woman becomes pregnant. However the woman changes her mind and wants an abortion. Legally she can, and the man’s child that he wants get killed (Even if he plans on raising the child alone).

Therefore a woman is able to change the terms of the oral contract at any time and what the man wants does not matter, according to law.

If you read between the lines the law is made knowing that female are weak minded so they are given special treatment. The fault is always given to the man for a pregnancy, even though female contraception exists. Condoms aren’t only made for men; actually females have many more forms of contraception than men.

 
Comment by Delia Florea
2007-11-16 11:10:17 - IP Man-Hash: d4e8a55fada4e

As long as the two have consensual unprotected sex, I find it normal that the guy will pay for the child. Of course, if she lies about being on the pill or whatever stuff like that, then yes, she shouldn’t get crap.

Also, I think women should have to justify the way they spend the child support money because I doubt a toddler wears Prada shoes for instance. But besides that it’s just common sense that both parents should contribute to the child. If you don’t like the consequences don’t have sex. If you don’t want a child as a man, don’t fuck around.

And abortion shouldn’t be used because you didn’t want to use the condom or pill. That should be if by mistake something happened or the woman got raped or something, even though there are pills for after.

And don’t bash on kristina because she has some points that are valid.

Comment by Jim
2008-07-28 10:36:43 - IP Man-Hash: 4b874af7b7581

“As long as the two have consensual unprotected sex, I find it normal that the guy will pay for the child. Of course, if she lies about being on the pill or whatever stuff like that, then yes, she shouldn’t get crap.”

Oh of course, because everyone youv’e ever slept with has gotten a written contract with you that says you were on the pill or not on the pill. No one believes the man in the courtroom when he says “She said she was on the pill!” It’s unfair, and it’s biased, but it’s reality.

“Also, I think women should have to justify the way they spend the child support money because I doubt a toddler wears Prada shoes for instance.”

Yeah, because the government has the money, time and resources to track the spending of every single woman on the child support system. Even if they did, the fact that they have to is proof enough that the system should be abolished or at least redone.

“If you don’t want a child as a man, don’t fuck around.” What of the women? So everyone should just stop having sex unless they want kids. Congratulations married couples, don’t want a kid, have fun jerking it mister newly wed, aren’t you glad you spent 10000fuckingdollars on this waste of 200 of your friends weekends, no sex and she can take half of your shit!

kristina doesn’t even make any valid points and talks about horrible things that are classified as FUCKED UP. Who puts that much thought into graphic descriptions of torture, even if they are lying whores. All of you are anyway, they are only worse because they get more payment then you do.

So shut the hell up, and go smash your keyboard with a sledge hammer so we never have to hear your stupid opinions again. Fuck off Dick’s website.

~J

 
 
Comment by Necroswordsman
2007-09-24 18:03:56 - IP Man-Hash: 19cb50505fa07

What is sick about abortion is the fact you’re one of those who thinks women should not have the option to abort, kristina. Yeah you go for those equal rights grrl.

Just give up now and I’ll give you a signed photo of my forum avatar.

‘Fuck off and die, lots of love, Necro’

 
Comment by Mansman
2007-09-24 16:40:30 - IP Man-Hash: deeb9291e85f3

kristina said:

Quit generalizing all women in the same category Dick…we arent all the same…

17yr olds aren’t WOMEN. They are girls; aka children.

Observe how this one feels entitled to goad her inexperienced misconceptions down everyone’s throat, like it’s the sacred word of Zeus. That’s what the entitlement syndrome does, it creates entitlement princesses (MABTW copyright of terms acknowledged).

The day society starts taking advice from 17yr old GIRLS no less, will be the day AFTER we got hit by some bigass meteorite, and only girlies survived it because Brave Men as you’d expect, would have honorably exercised their Titanical Manstincts.

“Thank you Sir” would seem to be a more appropriate response.

 
Comment by kristina
2007-09-23 12:11:02 - IP Man-Hash: f3f1c500bb544

Dick-Abortion is sick…you are truly giving men a bad look for womenwith this article…In this article you show men to be pigs who care nothing more except having a good fuck…This article would disgust my Father…Then again my father is human…No I’m not for women who use trickery just to get money…But tht doesnt neccesarily mean that just because they got pregnant she wasnt on the pill….even doctors say the pill and condom aren’t entirely 100% effective…and you down a woman because she doesnt wish to KILL her baby? Yes those who couldnt give a care about their baby and are in it only for the money are shit faced bitches who should be dragged about by their hair and then left to bes savagely eaten by rabid wolves…intestines first…but dont say taht all women are like this…and if women have to pay the price for having sex outside marriage then so do men…just like if men have to pay so do women…

My dad pays child support when he doesnt have to…Why? because he is a true man…He takes care of his responsibilities(not that thats all he thinks of us) and he does it without complaining…

Quit generalizing all women in the same category Dick…we arent all the same…

sides if i ever get pregnant im giving the man a chance to be in his childs life or not…there wont be any childsupport especially if he doesnt want to be there for the child…and any support i recieve from him will befor MY baby not me…and i really dont care if you men believe me or not :/

Jason Michael Carroll: Alyssa Lies

Comment by Banderman
2009-09-05 08:24:36 - IP Man-Hash: bd4f7d0a3a68e

A good fuck? Get over yourselves, it’s rare to find a woman that can stop thinking about herself for longer than an hour to enjoy good sex. If how American women represent themselves these days is any indication or result of the ‘woman’s movement’; psst, it was a dismal failure.

 
 
Comment by Necroswordsman
2007-03-04 16:44:09 - IP Man-Hash: 6597403bb0b5b

jon said:

Men deserve equal rights in everything if women deserve equal rights in anything.

Thats the anti-thesis of Feminism

 
Comment by jon
2007-03-04 15:43:40 - IP Man-Hash: 73f9de907ea55

Like the devil in prada.