Top Ten Reasons Men Are Better Than Women
MenAreBetterThanWomen.com reached 200,000 visitors early this morning, so I thought I would mark the occasion by posting a very special top ten list of the top ten ways in which men are better than women.
Naturally as a man the moment I thought of an idea I set to work implementing it — in this case by writing it. It would have been exactly the same if my idea had been the wheel or the Hoover Dam. That’s because I’m a man and instead of taking shit from the world around me, I can shove shit right back into it as well.
Dick’s Top Ten Reasons MenAreBetterThanWomen.com
10. Men do not have Tourette Syndrome
I believe all women suffer from a mild and extremely localized form of Tourette Syndrome. The afflicted organ? Their tongues. That’s why women cannot shut their fucking mouths for ten seconds while adults are speaking around them. Their tongues are battling around in their mouths like drunken Vipers.
9. Men are not sponges
Women are social chameleons — or better yet: social vampires. Women walk into a situation and before you know it they’ve completely changed their wardrobe and mannerisms as if they’ve joined a fucking cult. Men are not sheep. Everyone knows the word for a female sheep is ewe, but what about the male word? There isn’t one because sheep is something men are not.
8. Women are racists
Women’s entire lives and social circles are based around hatred. Do they hate their boyfriends? Do they hate their wardrobe? Do they hate each other? Yes, yes and fuck definitely. Men don’t go in for that silly sort of nonsense. If we’re dissatisfied, we pick up and move out. Or we take our mighty man muscles and lift fucking mountains so the world looks exactly the way we want it to. Men do more world changing before 9:00 AM than any woman ever has done in her whole life.
7. Men live less than women
The last thing a society needs is a bunch of non-contributing members laying around and sucking all the juice from the young. Men know this so they blast off from birth like shooting man stars — burning out ten years faster, but setting the whole night ablaze with manness. Women just kind of lie around like big fat pigs in big fat puddles of shit. Congratulations women. You really earned those rights!
6. Men write illegibly
Writing is stupid and an ineffective way to communicate. Men know this so they don’t give a shit about handwriting things with big hoops and loops and squiggles and shit so aliens can read notes about remembering to pick up your birth control pills after 6th period from space.
5. Jesus was a man
Whether or not you believe in Jesus, there is one fact you can’t argue with: he was a man. No religion anywhere has ever put a woman in charge of shit. That’s called dogma — man-dogma — and it means men are better than women.
4. Men wear watches
Do you know why men wear watches? It’s because there’s a limited amount of time in the day and men need to know how much of it there is so they can efficiently allocate their man ass kicking for the day. Women don’t wear watches; they wear bracelets. Women wearing bracelets is like dropping a bus of retarded kids off in front of a taffy pulling machine. They can just stare for hours and never get bored.
A watch says, ‘Get up and go! Move your man ass and take care of your fucking man business!’ That’s why 60 minutes uses a ticking watch for its theme song. ‘Important shit is going down and we’re about to talk about it in a fucking fastidious manner, so get the fuck ready,’ says a ticking watch. A bracelet says, ‘You’re most likely ugly, but look at how much money you’re worth!’ What a joke.
3. Boys destroy things
The only thing that has ever lifted our species out of the trees where we came from is our ability to destroy. Take paper: the cornerstone of the modern world. That was invented because man wanted to destroy trees and beat them into pulp. How about nuclear power? Men invented that too. Men are natural destructors. We pop right out of the man-womb and start on a life-long tirade of progress by tearing down the Earth with our mighty, man-manly man-fists. Goddammit, that’s awesome!
2. Marriage is stupid
Marriage is 100% the fault of women. It was invented by men though! Did you know that? Marriage was invented because women were too busy whoring it out to fuck the only the guy who was paying their rent and feeding their fat asses French bon-bons every day. Men invented marriage as a way of telling women who they could and couldn’t fuck. Like everything else men have ever invented, it completely worked and worked way better than any man thought it would. Women became so indoctrinated by the man-invention of marriage that they’re fucking obsessed with it.
Marriage is still stupid. It’s a stupid game invented to entertain stupid minds and to teach basic lessons of fidelity that even invertebrates are born with.
1. Men have penises
When it comes to being a man, being quick at identifying problems is tantamount to fixing them. In fact it’s tantamount-ier. Having a penis — in other words looking like a man and having man parts — is a man’s way of telling other men, ‘Hey. Look at me. I’m a man. I won’t fuck up whatever it is that you’re trying to do. If you need some help, maybe ask me and I’ll see if I can lend a man-hand. It’s the least I could do to be fucking courteous.’
Men Are Better Than Women.
Note: If you would like to link to this article from your website or MySpace page, use the following code:
Related Articles:
Pages: « 355 … 279 278 277 276 275 [274] 273 272 271 270 269 … 1 » Show All
honestly, to all the women on this comments getting all pissed off….learn to take a joke. dried-up desert cunts, its you all who arent getting any.
You forgot to put man womb.
Dicks Mother raised a Man.
Katies mother raised a murderer.
A Mare lacking reading and comprehension skills.
Read the opening page to the website you Goblin.
Fuck off from this site mare.
If a brain damaged cow , say one with mad cow disease, could somehow type, the above is what it would look like.
Until you learn how to put forth a cogent sentence,fuck off from this site hag.
You actually should be shot or hung….i’d say your mother is so ashamed of you!! Going by what your saying, you mother must be an inferior, slut faced, cheating whore, just as YOU described!! Your a disgrace your mother, what did she raise????? A SCUMBAG!!!
My own interest in the issue of Anglo-Saxon sexual mores arose initially from travelling Continental Europe: where it was plain an entirely distinct set of attitudes to sexuality prevailed, less based on female barter of sex for economic/social reward. This also had a wider existential ramification, in that Continental women resembled ‘normal’ people, with reasonably informed opinions on a variety of political/social issues - entirely unlike Anglo-Saxon women, trapped in parochial ‘female’ obsessions and holding only intolerant, neo-fascist opinions on every serious issue.
Hoping to unravel these suspicions, I began to read works by thinkers outside the Anglo-Saxon world and was amazed to find a rich vein of rational criticism dating back centuries. Many Germans, for instance, have held Anglo-Saxon culture in contempt: this includes such luminaries as Goethe, Nietzsche and Dr Rudolph Steiner. Heartened by these findings, I turned to modern thinkers like Benoist and Baron Julius Evola. The latter’s Revolt Against the Modern World seemed to attack Anglo-Saxon women in a bold, revolutionary manner, as nothing I have read before or since.
Evola asserted that Anglo women, growing up in a Puritanical culture, develop a pronounced sense of existential entitlement. He also singled out the United States as the nexus of this gynaecratic culture. Most fascinating, he cites evidence that despite Anglo-American women being portrayed to the world in movies and other crass, populist media forms as ’sexy’ and ‘enticing’, around 70% of American women have no normal sexual response (a fact maintained by the most credible researchers active today). Evola linked these developments, like his master, Rene Guenon, to the Kali Yuga of Indian scripture: an age of vapid culture, absurd art, social dissolution, female ‘rights’, materialism, consumerism and existential despair. This age is the age when lunar forces take command of the West: and what men foolishly perceive as ‘progress’ is in fact regression to the darkest of Dark Ages. Yeats expounds this end in the Second Coming:
‘The good lack all conviction, while the worst are filled with passionate intensity…’
Of course, this end for the West is predestined: there is nothing we can do to allay or prevent it. Indeed, in Ride the Tiger Evola suggests that hastening the end of this cultural phase, rather than striving to protect the vestigial elements of Tradition that remain (as academic ‘intellectuals’ foolishly strive to do), might be the wiser course for the enlightened man. Feminism will destroy the West, so back feminism: the sooner the Kali Yuga ends, the sooner a new Golden Age for the West (Spring, in Spengler’s sense) can be initiated.
I have Posner’s book but have not read it - must redress that omission. I would also be grateful for some book references about the British assault on sexual imagery in India. The British attack on native sexual liberties in the South Seas was also catastrophic, incidentally.
Dick, I love your writing.
What a load of fascist horseshit.
What the fuck is she talking about?
There once was a pauper named Dave
Who stole from a prostitute’s grave
She was missing a tit
And had worms in her clit
But think of the money he saved.
hi i would like to say i am a man that likes what you do butt is it all show or do u realy feel like this and why does every women say their better because they have babbies and the whole world came from their fat cunts.thats all they have is fat cunts that more fat cunts fall out of wow that all you women got is babbies and most women kill their babbies in hot cars when their shopping in the summer heat and kill them when its to much to take care of women are fat pigs that fuck spit out babbies and eat and get money to fuck and every loves them fat hores i am glad i am a man and cant spit babbies out and why do women want alot of creidt for making babies can i get credit for cumming in that fat cunt.oh wate i do i halft to pay the fat hore to spit that babbie out fuck women can all eat my shit i am 25m i can get a girl but like my money in my pocket thanks fat hores.
id love 2 know where your from because u wouldnt kno wat was happening 2 u if i got my hands on u,how dare u think your better than women u fucking pig!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!
obviously your gay sorry 4 u,no woman wud ever go near u
and u wouldnt even b on this earth if it wasnt 4 women,r u gonna start giving birth now r something?????just so u kno women and men are equal,im not going 2 make myself look lik a fool lik u n say anything else u cunt
you are a stupid prick,i hope u die of aids u wanker,do u hav this disrespect 4 your mother u pig????????i tell u now if i was left in a room with u only 1 of us would b leaving and it wud b me because even though im a woman id beat the shit out of any man who spoke down 2 me u fucking arsehole
To mr sandy-vagina
I’m a man,
and this site sucks balls!
Okay, men may have done a lot of important stuff in the past,
but each of those ‘Manly-men with their manly-man-hands’ had a loving female in their life.
Society, and getting forward in life, is supposed to be something everybody does their part in.
Men = Women
You my friend seem very threathened in your masculinity
did your momma beat you up when you we’re a little boy?
I just hope that in time you realise that life without love is meaningless,
unless youre a faggot, but I’m cool with that.
Live and let live retard
Gay Men! Because it’s not that you’re unattractive, lack a personality, and have no future whatsoever, it’s that he likes the cock!
Suck a fat cock, you ass spelonker.
RAPE: Because women have a fetish with it anywho.
You and seduce??? You don’t have a clue how to seduce a man, you only know how to capture a man and because every man is running away from you, the only way you could stop man from running away form you is by sliting his throat. You see, you are very easy to understand. Would not be that much better idea to actually learn how to seduce a man? But learn like form where? hugh? I mean all pseudo - feminists can only teach you; how to slit a man’s throat, or man’s dick. Which bring us to the point, why you still convincing yourself that any man would want your pussy??? because we men don’t want your pussy, but maybe some other female who is just like you would be intereted, so you can take turns in sliting each other throats.
COULDNT HAVE SAID IT BETTER MYSELF!
Dear Muzalon:
You’re both a gentleman and a scholar, my friend. I respect you for both your cosmopolitanism and your learning.
I am intrigued by your constant allusions to the puritanical basis of much contemporary Western European culture and civilization, with especial reference to the Protestant Anglo-Saxon strain of Western-derived social organization in particular. Richard Posner, a law professor at the University of Chicago, has written a fascinating book called “Sex and Reason”. Perhaps you have read it? The central thesis of the book gravitates around the subject of how the modern conceptualization of human sexuality can be fully integrated within both a jurisprudential and economic framework. However, Posner also manages to meticulously explore why many of the societies of the ancient past, such as Greece and Rome, as well as many existing Third World and Catholic Mediterranean societies, that happen to be very “machista” in both social atmosphere and tone, tend to be much more liberal towards human sexual expression than either their corresponding Western European complement in general or their Anglo-Saxon equivalent in particular. Mr Posner’s understanding of the rigid nature of the prevailing Calvinist morality that undergirds the fundamental structure of the contemporary social institutions of the Anglo-Saxon world rests on a distinction he draws between companionate and noncompanionate marriage. He defines companionate marriage as being a genuine partnership between husband and wife supposedly based on mutual love and respect, with both spouses expected to participate equally in the daily operation of the household economy. It is chiefly distinguished from noncompanionate marriage by the fact that male-female relations are no longer exclusively organized around the male need for sexual release or the assurance of paternity and patrilineal inheritance. In his book, Posner writes:
Companionate marriage fosters puritanical attitudes generally, so we should not be surprised by the puritanical strain in the Anglo-American sexual culture. A husband’s adultery becomes for the first time offensive , because it undermines love and trust and reduces the amount of time that he spends with his wife, which are elements of companionate but not of noncompanionate marriage. The patronizing of prostitutes by married men is a form of adultery, and so also becomes offensive. Moreover, as a male-female relationship signally lacking in love and trust – a relationship characterized, indeed, by the impersonality of the spot market – prostitution is incongruous in a society that has turned its back on the businesslike model of noncompanionate marriage. But because prostitution is a substitute for forms of extramarital sex that are more threatening to companionate marriage, and thus is a complement to as well as a substitute for such marriage, the effect of a social commitment to companionate marriage is not to condemn outright but to problematize what in a society of noncompanionate marriage would be an unproblematic institution. (158)
Posner generally attributes the puritanical undercurrents of modern Anglo-Saxon culture to the rise of companionate marriage during the sixteenth century. This is brought about through the advent of a nascent Western capitalism and the English version of the Lutheran Reformation. It stands in sharp bas-relief to the more traditional noncompanionate forms of marriage which had previously dominated all of the societies of classical antiquity and other non-Western cultures before the advent of European exploration and colonization. As an interesting sidebar, it seems that wherever the shadow of the Pax Britannia fell, so fell the rigidly puritanical values it brought with it. Consistent with this, many previous scholars and ethnographers once argued that the culture of the Indian sub-continent was positively licentious. As a matter of fact, pre-Mughal Indian culture was characterized by having a highly sexualized body of erotic literature (such as the Kama Sutra) and many of its most sacred temple complexes were decorated in a rich pornographic imagery. After the eighteenth century introduction of the British Raj, the East India Company, and the legions of evangelizing Christian missionaries who came trailing behind from the rear, the Indians became even more fanatically puritanical than the traditionally more socially rigid Englishman.
Maybe we should also be looking at the notion of the Protestant Work Ethic developed by German sociologist Max Weber. It is evident that much of the socially conservative, morally puritanical underpinnings of Anglo-American civilization (the United States, Canada, Great Britain, Australia, and New Zealand) come from the rigid Calvinist morality preached by the first English pilgrims settling the New World. The reformer John Calvin, the theological idol of the first Puritans, did stress the value of hard work and the full completion of those religious tasks mandated by God as a means of determining who ultimately numbered amongst “the predestined Elect.” Additionally, the only way any of the believers could be certain of his salvation was on the basis of how much wealth he had accumulated throughout an entire lifetime, eventually culminating in the “time is money” mantra of modern Western capitalism (secularized Calvinist morality). Thus, those who were either financially impoverished or deviated from the average code of conduct prescribed by Calvin and personally exemplified by many a Puritan believer, came to be regarded as social outcastes condemned to an eternity of hellfire and suffering.
Nicely placed. They aren’t called manholes for nothing.