Top Ten Reasons Men Are Better Than Women

MenAreBetterThanWomen.com reached 200,000 visitors early this morning, so I thought I would mark the occasion by posting a very special top ten list of the top ten ways in which men are better than women.

Naturally as a man the moment I thought of an idea I set to work implementing it — in this case by writing it. It would have been exactly the same if my idea had been the wheel or the Hoover Dam. That’s because I’m a man and instead of taking shit from the world around me, I can shove shit right back into it as well.

Dick’s Top Ten Reasons MenAreBetterThanWomen.com

10. Men do not have Tourette Syndrome

I believe all women suffer from a mild and extremely localized form of Tourette Syndrome. The afflicted organ? Their tongues. That’s why women cannot shut their fucking mouths for ten seconds while adults are speaking around them. Their tongues are battling around in their mouths like drunken Vipers.

9. Men are not sponges

Women are social chameleons — or better yet: social vampires. Women walk into a situation and before you know it they’ve completely changed their wardrobe and mannerisms as if they’ve joined a fucking cult. Men are not sheep. Everyone knows the word for a female sheep is ewe, but what about the male word? There isn’t one because sheep is something men are not.

8. Women are racists

Women’s entire lives and social circles are based around hatred. Do they hate their boyfriends? Do they hate their wardrobe? Do they hate each other? Yes, yes and fuck definitely. Men don’t go in for that silly sort of nonsense. If we’re dissatisfied, we pick up and move out. Or we take our mighty man muscles and lift fucking mountains so the world looks exactly the way we want it to. Men do more world changing before 9:00 AM than any woman ever has done in her whole life.

7. Men live less than women

The last thing a society needs is a bunch of non-contributing members laying around and sucking all the juice from the young. Men know this so they blast off from birth like shooting man stars — burning out ten years faster, but setting the whole night ablaze with manness. Women just kind of lie around like big fat pigs in big fat puddles of shit. Congratulations women. You really earned those rights!

6. Men write illegibly

Writing is stupid and an ineffective way to communicate. Men know this so they don’t give a shit about handwriting things with big hoops and loops and squiggles and shit so aliens can read notes about remembering to pick up your birth control pills after 6th period from space.

5. Jesus was a man

Whether or not you believe in Jesus, there is one fact you can’t argue with: he was a man. No religion anywhere has ever put a woman in charge of shit. That’s called dogma — man-dogma — and it means men are better than women.

4. Men wear watches

Do you know why men wear watches? It’s because there’s a limited amount of time in the day and men need to know how much of it there is so they can efficiently allocate their man ass kicking for the day. Women don’t wear watches; they wear bracelets. Women wearing bracelets is like dropping a bus of retarded kids off in front of a taffy pulling machine. They can just stare for hours and never get bored.

A watch says, ‘Get up and go! Move your man ass and take care of your fucking man business!’ That’s why 60 minutes uses a ticking watch for its theme song. ‘Important shit is going down and we’re about to talk about it in a fucking fastidious manner, so get the fuck ready,’ says a ticking watch. A bracelet says, ‘You’re most likely ugly, but look at how much money you’re worth!’ What a joke.

3. Boys destroy things

The only thing that has ever lifted our species out of the trees where we came from is our ability to destroy. Take paper: the cornerstone of the modern world. That was invented because man wanted to destroy trees and beat them into pulp. How about nuclear power? Men invented that too. Men are natural destructors. We pop right out of the man-womb and start on a life-long tirade of progress by tearing down the Earth with our mighty, man-manly man-fists. Goddammit, that’s awesome!

2. Marriage is stupid

Marriage is 100% the fault of women. It was invented by men though! Did you know that? Marriage was invented because women were too busy whoring it out to fuck the only the guy who was paying their rent and feeding their fat asses French bon-bons every day. Men invented marriage as a way of telling women who they could and couldn’t fuck. Like everything else men have ever invented, it completely worked and worked way better than any man thought it would. Women became so indoctrinated by the man-invention of marriage that they’re fucking obsessed with it.

Marriage is still stupid. It’s a stupid game invented to entertain stupid minds and to teach basic lessons of fidelity that even invertebrates are born with.

1. Men have penises

When it comes to being a man, being quick at identifying problems is tantamount to fixing them. In fact it’s tantamount-ier. Having a penis — in other words looking like a man and having man parts — is a man’s way of telling other men, ‘Hey. Look at me. I’m a man. I won’t fuck up whatever it is that you’re trying to do. If you need some help, maybe ask me and I’ll see if I can lend a man-hand. It’s the least I could do to be fucking courteous.’

Men Are Better Than Women.

Note: If you would like to link to this article from your website or MySpace page, use the following code:

Related Articles:

RSS feed | Trackback URI

8,973 Comments in 7296 threads.»

Pages: « 365331 330 329 328 327 [326] 325 324 323 322 3211 » Show All

Comment by bola
2008-07-02 13:16:01 - IP Man-Hash: a28a8fa6fa63a

Spikey said:

bola said:

Spikey said:

Article 2 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: “Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.”

By claiming that men are “better” than women and that men are entitled to more rights than women because women are not equal to men, you are violating one of the most basic human rights. Your claims are totally unjustified and are based solely on hate, therefor none of what you say means anything. You are basically dehumanizing 50% of the people on Earth just because they were born females.

I am a free man and I declare that nothing Dick states in this blog represents me or my opinion in any way. I ask that all who are reading this comment right now not take anything he states as the collective opinion or stand of men. He is simply an anomaly unworthy of representing men.

As a free man I also acknowledge that women are equal to men in terms of rights and responsibilities, and that anyone who thinks otherwise is a shame on Mankind - the same way racist persons are a shame on human civilization.

Respect and Liberty to all.

Then why don’t you pontificate about the right of unborn children to live, the right of children to have two parents, the right of boys to develop their gender role without a bunch of social engineering goons trying to deconstruct and redefine their masculinity, the right of fathers to have shared equal parenting, the right of men to be free of incessant man bashing, guilt mongering and false allegations, the right of men to be treated equal by the law and to have due process?

What’s your obsession with the rights of women? We hear about women being better than men every day of our lives. That doesn’t seem to bother you.

What’s with the double standards, you liberal hypocrat?

Just because I defended women’s rights doesn’t mean I’m an oppressed wussy.

Nice deflection. Hit a nerve there didn’t I?

 
Comment by bola
2008-07-02 13:14:19 - IP Man-Hash: a28a8fa6fa63a

Maggie said:

‘Respect and Liberty to all.’

Amen to that, Spikey.

Yeah, tell it to the people who are being brought before the BCHRC. Human rights and freedom of speech don’t go together well.

And yeah, I’m sure you’re used to having the numbers of your side, so you can shut anybody up by booing and hissing or by beating them over the head with your sterile human rights jargon.

 
Comment by bola
2008-07-02 13:08:53 - IP Man-Hash: a28a8fa6fa63a

Maggie said:

‘Respect and Liberty to all.’

Amen to that, Spikey.

Well, they say (whoever ‘they’ are) that you should never argue with idiots as they only bring you down to their level and beat you with their experience. I find myself outnumbered by the seasoned idiots on this site. So I’m off to do something productive (a foreign concept for many of you). No doubt you’ll count this as some sort of victory and pound on your keyboards with delight. Hey, you’re entitled to whatever meager happiness you can get.

Son of suns- Bin Laden has thousands of his own people kill themselves in pursuit of a ridiculous ideal. If you don’t see that as any sort of failure then it’s not worth arguing over.

Bola- did you hear about the 68-year-old Australian man who hacked his wife and grandchildren to death (not sure about the sex of the children but I am sure you’ll find something wonderful to say about their grandmother)? Just thought I’d throw out a fun fact of my own.

I blame the matriarchy!

 
Comment by Spikey
2008-07-02 13:06:21 - IP Man-Hash: 79022451e6b56

bola said:

Spikey said:

Article 2 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: “Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.”

By claiming that men are “better” than women and that men are entitled to more rights than women because women are not equal to men, you are violating one of the most basic human rights. Your claims are totally unjustified and are based solely on hate, therefor none of what you say means anything. You are basically dehumanizing 50% of the people on Earth just because they were born females.

I am a free man and I declare that nothing Dick states in this blog represents me or my opinion in any way. I ask that all who are reading this comment right now not take anything he states as the collective opinion or stand of men. He is simply an anomaly unworthy of representing men.

As a free man I also acknowledge that women are equal to men in terms of rights and responsibilities, and that anyone who thinks otherwise is a shame on Mankind - the same way racist persons are a shame on human civilization.

Respect and Liberty to all.

Then why don’t you pontificate about the right of unborn children to live, the right of children to have two parents, the right of boys to develop their gender role without a bunch of social engineering goons trying to deconstruct and redefine their masculinity, the right of fathers to have shared equal parenting, the right of men to be free of incessant man bashing, guilt mongering and false allegations, the right of men to be treated equal by the law and to have due process?

What’s your obsession with the rights of women? We hear about women being better than men every day of our lives. That doesn’t seem to bother you.

What’s with the double standards, you liberal hypocrat?

Just because I defended women’s rights doesn’t mean I’m an oppressed wussy.

 
Comment by Maggie
2008-07-02 12:44:56 - IP Man-Hash: 98329034dbc14

‘Respect and Liberty to all.’

Amen to that, Spikey.

Well, they say (whoever ‘they’ are) that you should never argue with idiots as they only bring you down to their level and beat you with their experience. I find myself outnumbered by the seasoned idiots on this site. So I’m off to do something productive (a foreign concept for many of you). No doubt you’ll count this as some sort of victory and pound on your keyboards with delight. Hey, you’re entitled to whatever meager happiness you can get.

Son of suns- Bin Laden has thousands of his own people kill themselves in pursuit of a ridiculous ideal. If you don’t see that as any sort of failure then it’s not worth arguing over.

Bola- did you hear about the 68-year-old Australian man who hacked his wife and grandchildren to death (not sure about the sex of the children but I am sure you’ll find something wonderful to say about their grandmother)? Just thought I’d throw out a fun fact of my own.

 
Comment by Commander Scott
2008-07-02 12:28:03 - IP Man-Hash: 8ed771f3ec739

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is a socialist document propagated by an ineffective organization and deliberately designed with the object of male psychological emasculation in mind; it is a subversive communist document the raison d’etre of which is to undermine male patriarchal dominance by feminizing it’s rough outer edges. Go suck on a tampon popsicle and die, you frigid cunt.

 
Comment by bola
2008-07-02 12:26:46 - IP Man-Hash: a28a8fa6fa63a

Spikey said:

Article 2 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: “Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.”

By claiming that men are “better” than women and that men are entitled to more rights than women because women are not equal to men, you are violating one of the most basic human rights. Your claims are totally unjustified and are based solely on hate, therefor none of what you say means anything. You are basically dehumanizing 50% of the people on Earth just because they were born females.

I am a free man and I declare that nothing Dick states in this blog represents me or my opinion in any way. I ask that all who are reading this comment right now not take anything he states as the collective opinion or stand of men. He is simply an anomaly unworthy of representing men.

As a free man I also acknowledge that women are equal to men in terms of rights and responsibilities, and that anyone who thinks otherwise is a shame on Mankind - the same way racist persons are a shame on human civilization.

Respect and Liberty to all.

Then why don’t you pontificate about the right of unborn children to live, the right of children to have two parents, the right of boys to develop their gender role without a bunch of social engineering goons trying to deconstruct and redefine their masculinity, the right of fathers to have shared equal parenting, the right of men to be free of incessant man bashing, guilt mongering and false allegations, the right of men to be treated equal by the law and to have due process?

What’s your obsession with the rights of women? We hear about women being better than men every day of our lives. That doesn’t seem to bother you.

What’s with the double standards, you liberal hypocrat?

 
Comment by Spikey
2008-07-02 11:54:54 - IP Man-Hash: 79022451e6b56

Article 2 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: “Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.”

By claiming that men are “better” than women and that men are entitled to more rights than women because women are not equal to men, you are violating one of the most basic human rights. Your claims are totally unjustified and are based solely on hate, therefor none of what you say means anything. You are basically dehumanizing 50% of the people on Earth just because they were born females.

I am a free man and I declare that nothing Dick states in this blog represents me or my opinion in any way. I ask that all who are reading this comment right now not take anything he states as the collective opinion or stand of men. He is simply an anomaly unworthy of representing men.

As a free man I also acknowledge that women are equal to men in terms of rights and responsibilities, and that anyone who thinks otherwise is a shame on Mankind - the same way racist persons are a shame on human civilization.

Respect and Liberty to all.

 
Comment by the bitch you love to hate
2008-07-02 09:54:37 - IP Man-Hash: 6c6ee64e60c1b

ten things men know about women

10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1. they have boobs

you fucking dork you if you were the last man on earth the fucking human population would die. no woman would want to lay you and have the possible chance of having the world turn out like you or any part of you…..
this is one reason some women prefer to be with other women …… O.M.F.G. i think the reason your like this is because your mother was a whore right ? and your wife or girlfriend dumped you for another woman ….

 
Comment by the bitch you love to hate
2008-07-02 09:42:18 - IP Man-Hash: 6c6ee64e60c1b

you think your better because you’re a man…..you should try walking a day in a womans shoes……having a dick dosn’t mean you’re a man. owning up to your responsibilities is how you become a man.
(opinions are like assholes everybody has one and most women have 2)

 
Comment by studioline
2008-07-02 08:13:51 - IP Man-Hash: c07f40ef972a9

Chris gezz that was some damn good advice you gave, Guys this deserves round of aplause. By the way this way a man can not only save his ass form being accused of harasment or rape but he is also saving her from sabotaging herself from being glad she did it.

 
Comment by Commander Scott
2008-07-02 06:24:26 - IP Man-Hash: 8ed771f3ec739

Chris said:

Commander Scott said:
(2) Given the fact that so many men are deluded by false notions of chivalry, how does one avoid the risk of violent retaliation after the accusation has been made?

I don’t understand. What exactly are you asking here??

What I meant to ask is that when a woman accuses a man of rape or sexual harassment, why is it that a certain group of males associated with the woman will automatically take it upon themselves to retaliate against the man accused of gross sexual misconduct, even when there is no evidence substantiating the allegation itself? How can any man allow himself to be manipulated by a woman into perpetrating harm against another man who has been probably falsely accused of rape or harassment? Are men so blinded to the illusions of chivalry, that they regard any woman who makes a random accusation of rape against an innocent bystander as some sort of “damsel in distress”?

 
Comment by Chris
2008-07-01 21:21:13 - IP Man-Hash: 26ae30c2e799b

Commander Scott said:

(1) How does one successfully ignore a woman’s false accusations of rape or sexual harassment in light of the fact that a man is often presumed guilty in such a situation, regardless of whether there is any corroborating evidence or eyewitness testimony?

When I said “IGNORE” her . . . I was referring to women who CLAIM they were raped and/ or sexually harassed by someone else, in her past, or previously.

Naturally , if she is accusing YOU of any of that, it wouldn’t be as easy to dismiss.

I have a stock response for that which will usually snap a woman right out of it, and make her want to change the subject pretty quickly. I say it with a smile and she will usually smile right along with me . . . .

“Oh gimme a break. If Brad Pitt ’sexually harrassed’ you in exactly the same way . . . you would be on your back with your legs in the air faster than you can say ‘ANGELINA WHO?’. You know it . And I know it.”

Sexual ‘harrassment’ is just –>> sexual ATTENTION.

The only difference is –>> ‘harassment’ is UNWANTED attention.

Women openly COMPLAIN and PRETEND TO HATE sexual attention . . .yet they make every effort to generate as much sexual attention for themselves as possible, each and every day of their lives.

HE: “Nice ass.”

This is NOT an insult. This is a COMPLIMENT. And a woman with a nice ass WANTS it to be noticed. She is going to Pilates. She runs. She diets like crazy, and spends a weekend picking out the PERFECT jeans for that ass. But she will REACT as if she was just ‘harassed’. . . .

SHE: “Ew, Get lost!! You creep!! User!! Stalker!! Pig!!”

THE BIG QUESTION —>> Why wouldn’t a woman just say “Thanks!”

?

THAT’S the type of ’sexual harassment’ accusation you should IGNORE and even laugh in her face about. Because she is just being rediculous. It wouldn’t hurt to point it out to her either.

YOU: “Why wouldn’t you just say THANKS?? I didn’t INSULT you, you know”. Smile and walk away. Sometimes, she will even come after you and apologize.

That gives you the perfect opportunity to say “Go away. I don’t waste my time with a girl who react to a compliment like it’s a TRAGEDY.”

And watch what happens.

•••

On the other hand . . . .
Women don’t think SEX is “sexy”.
Only IMPLIED sex is “sexy”.

It can NEVER be “perceived” as sexual harassment as long as a guy NEVER actually comes out and says anything SEXUAL. As soon as a guy says something SEXUAL . . . he’s killed it.

But if he can IMPLY sexual attention, she will react favorably. Because ANTICIPATION and INTERPRETATION is what women are all about.

So instead of “nice ass” he could try looking her directly in the face and say “Those pilates classes are paying off for you.” . . . . which means exactly the same thing as “nice ass”.

• “What does he mean by that?”
• “Does he want to fuck me?”
• “Is he interested? Or is he not interested?”
• “He talked to me yesterday, but he’s ignoring me today”

•••

I like pretty aggressive & rough sex. The way I protect myself against a false accusation of “rape”, is easy. I record the audio on my mobile phone, or my home computer.

Every time I have sex, I record the audio. Any accusation of “rape” would be instantly thrown out when you play it back for her. No woman is ever gonna falsely accuse me of ‘rape’ and get away with it.

Commander Scott said:

(2) Given the fact that so many men are deluded by false notions of chivalry, how does one avoid the risk of violent retaliation after the accusation has been made?

I don’t understand. What exactly are you asking here??

 
Comment by Commander Scott
2008-07-01 18:57:07 - IP Man-Hash: 8ed771f3ec739

Chris said:
When a woman uses the word ‘rape’, ’sexual harrassment’, or ‘romance’,
JUST IGNORE HER.

Chris, you seem to be the kind of person who has a lot of practical experience with women, an experience that a great many men would probably envy.

However, I have two questions concerning your response:

(1) How does one successfully ignore a woman’s false accusations of rape or sexual harassment in light of the fact that a man is often presumed guilty in such a situation, regardless of whether there is any corroborating evidence or eyewitness testimony?

and,

(2) Given the fact that so many men are deluded by false notions of chivalry, how does one avoid the risk of violent retaliation after the accusation has been made?

Remember, female aggression against other males is often carried out through the agency of those DOMINANT males (often violent, deranged criminals) of whom she associates with exclusively; in other words, all she has to do is point a finger, scream “rape” or “sexual harassment” and the next thing you know, you’re trying to fight off the violent attack of some criminal psychopath she has the impudence to call her “boyfriend” or “love interest”.

 
Comment by Mark
2008-07-01 18:16:13 - IP Man-Hash: d31d7176eef9f

Chris said:

When a woman uses the word ‘rape’, ’sexual harrassment’, or ‘romance’,
JUST IGNORE HER.

That last part made me laugh out loud. Ignoring her something that a woman would call - abuse, for all the reasons you just mentioned. If you tell a girl to get lost, she will call it ‘domestic violence’.

 
Comment by Chris
2008-07-01 17:11:38 - IP Man-Hash: 8fdae3316d084

Commander Scott said:

RAPE IS ABOUT SEXUAL GRATIFICATION!
RAPE IS ABOUT SEX AND NOT POWER!

“Sexual harrassment” is about …
“Rape” is about ….
“Romance” is about ….

WHO CARES!

WOMEN are the one’s who use those words. Men should stop even trying to figure out what they mean –>> BECAUSE THE DEFINITION (AND DISTINCTION) IS ONLY IMAGINED IN A WOMAN’S HEAD.

If a girl IS attracted to a guy, sexual harrassment is just called hot flirting. The same exact behavior from a guy she is NOT attracted to is called –>> ’sexual harassment’.

The line between the two is only drawn in HER head.

If a girl IS attracted to a guy, RAPE is exactly how great sex SHOULD be. The same exact sexual behavior from a guy she married just for the money is called —>> ‘rape’.

The line between the two is only drawn in HER head.

If a woman is in love with a man . . . . and she moves to Paris . . . and a buys a plane ticket to follow her. She will think it’s the ‘ROMANTIC’ gesture in the world.

If the woman is NOT in love with him . . . . POOF! he’s a “STALKER”.
the line between the ‘complete romantic’ and ‘total stalker’ is only drawn in HER head.

The guy in any of these scenarios has not done ANYTHING different or wrong. He’s just really into her. And if she were really into him, she wouldn’t have a problem with ANY of it.

THERE ISN’T ANYTHING REALLY ‘WRONG’ WITH THE MAN’S BEHAVIOR HERE,
IT’S JUST HER ‘PERCEPTION’ OF HIM.

When a woman uses the word ‘rape’, ’sexual harrassment’, or ‘romance’,
JUST IGNORE HER.

 
Comment by Commander Scott
2008-07-01 16:14:52 - IP Man-Hash: 8ed771f3ec739

RAPE IS ABOUT SEXUAL GRATIFICATION!

The act of forcible copulation is primarily motivated by the desire for sexual gratification. If such is the case, then the act of rape itself cannot occur without sexual arousal, involving activation of the psycho-sexual centres of the brain, sustained erection and possible ejaculation of seminal fluid. Without the initial experience of sexual physiological arousal in the human male, it would be virtually impossible to commit rape. On this basis alone, it should be obvious that the commission of rape is about the illicit search for carnal satisfaction. Another fact concerning rape is that the overwhelming majority of women targeted as rape victims are women of child-bearing age (according to researchers Thornhill and Palmer (2000), most victims are roughly between the ages of 16 – 24; a U.S. Department of Justice report released in 1994 states that over 50% of all women who were raped in 1992 are between the ages of 16 - 18). If rape is about power, than why is rape almost always perpetrated against women who are at the peak of both their physical strength and vitality? If forcible copulation was driven by the motivation to seek power, then logically speaking, the overwhelming majority of women who would be subject to rape would be pre-pubescent children or geriatric cases in their sixties and seventies, those chronological periods which correspond the most to those moments in a woman’s life cycle when she is at her weakest and most vulnerable. However, this is not the case; relatively young, nubile, physically strong and athletic women are targeted with great frequency because rape is about sexual gratification and has absolutely nothing to do with the brute exercise of naked power.

Consistent with the afore-mentioned data, the fact that women are raped has everything to do with the natural repugnance towards human sexuality harboured by the vast majority of women. If women enjoyed sex, than why should rape be such a painful ordeal? If women enjoyed sex just as much as men did, rape would be a welcome, if not highly enjoyable diversion. However, this is not the case because women are filled with a violent hatred towards all forms of sexual activity; in other words, women have evolved by means of natural selection to only use the act of coitus as a means of socio-economic exchange by which the most desirable males are coerced into providing money and resources in exchange for both reproductively and sexually available females. Additionally, because men have higher levels of testosterone and correspondingly higher sex drives than women, who either have lower levels of testosterone or are physiologically insensitive to the presence of androgenic steroids, it is obvious that men will want sex more, whereas women will desire it less or not at all. Those men who desire sex more, because of the more sophisticated neuro-biological mechanism of sexual motivation found within the male central nervous system, can easily lead to a situation of forcible copulation where the woman does not want sex because of her lesser sex drive or complete sexual frigidity.

From an evolutionary biological perspective, it is the primacy of female reproductive choice that has the potential to act as a kind of “rape trigger”. On the one hand, because women can only have small numbers of offspring, most women are rigidly monogamous; on the other hand, because of the great male potential for gene proliferation through large numbers of offspring, it only takes a small number of males to tie up the reproductive functioning of hundreds, if not many thousands, of females, thereby depriving many males of access to both sexually and reproductively available females. It is within the context of these biological parameters, that a heterosexual marketplace, based on the principles of socio-economic exchange and driven by the mechanism of male-male intra-sexual competition, is automatically established because of the monopolization of large numbers of available females at the hands of a small number of dominant males. Because the male-male competition for available females will be fierce, if not violent, those men who are unable to attract an available female because of poverty, lack of status, or absence of great physical strength and aggression, will be completely denied access to available females and the chance to transmit their DNA to future generations, ultimately transforming rape into the natural evolutionary by-product of sexual physiological differentiation between both genders.

Those who say that rape is about power are merely regurgitating the ideological mantras of radical feminism. Rape is about sex, not power. Indeed, how could it be otherwise? If the vast majority of men want sex all of the time and the vast majority of women have a strong, natural aversion to sex, then wouldn’t one of the inevitable outcomes of such a sex difference, which operates on both a neuro-endocrinological and biochemical level, be rape?

RAPE IS ABOUT SEX AND NOT POWER!

 
Comment by Jordon Foskett
2008-07-01 16:07:54 - IP Man-Hash: dfbe028bfc0ea

You are so truely right. Need I say anymore

 
Comment by studioline
2008-07-01 15:18:31 - IP Man-Hash: a710eaed74932

claudia hillman said:

I have an interesting story to tell Dick.When I was 25 years old I went through a sex change operation and became a woman.It really sucked being a woman.All women are is vain and jealous of each other.They only use men as an atm machine Now im 45 years old and dont dress like a woman anymore (even though I have a pussy) It is better to be a man.I wasted 20 years of my life as a woman.I was a firefighter and EMT prior to doing this and am trying to be an EMT again.I still dont know why women are treated better then men.Society is kinder to women.I have been with my gf for 8 years and love her very much.I regret that I became a woman back in 1989

What can I say. If site like this existed back then my bet is you woudn’t do it. I can tell you something form my life which I think realtes to your story. Every woman expects me to pick up on her. I thaught it’s just me, but here on this site I found that women desperatly seek attention, from other men too. And then they blame us men that we are perverts. One thing among others this site gives me is a hope that one day maybe men won’t be obligated to chease after women. So I wander Pls if you can answer honestly, Did you do it because you were tired of having to or being obligated to chease after women since you were a man?

 
Comment by claudia hillman
2008-07-01 15:01:20 - IP Man-Hash: a8f17b684b2b1

I have an interesting story to tell Dick.When I was 25 years old I went through a sex change operation and became a woman.It really sucked being a woman.All women are is vain and jealous of each other.They only use men as an atm machine Now im 45 years old and dont dress like a woman anymore (even though I have a pussy) It is better to be a man.I wasted 20 years of my life as a woman.I was a firefighter and EMT prior to doing this and am trying to be an EMT again.I still dont know why women are treated better then men.Society is kinder to women.I have been with my gf for 8 years and love her very much.I regret that I became a woman back in 1989

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

Close
E-mail It
Powered by ShareThis