Want to Help Women? Punch One in the Face
Women have no fear of anything.
They have no fear of any shit breaking because some man will always fix it in a charming attempt to fuck them — which usually works. They have no fear of losing their jobs because they don’t ever support themselves anyway. Women are like shrieking monkeys jumping like silly jackasses from tree to tree in a forest of men with big burly arms and deep pockets.
Women especially have no fear of saying or doing anything stupid. You really want to do something for women? Next time you hear one acting stupid, just knock the shit out of her.
That would make a hell of an alibi too. After all, who would believe her?
“Defendant, you stand accused of striking this woman because she didn’t know the difference between her office key and her apartment key even though one has flowers and shit all over it. How do you plead?”
“Your honour…are you fucking serious? What kind of person would do that?”
The classic, “Are you fucking serious” defense. I’ve seen it a hundred times.
Let me step back for a moment before my manjo gets carried away with itself. I’m not saying that all men should go out and start beating women like they’re piñatas until cogent ideas start pouring out of their mouths like delicious candy. First of all, that would never work. Even with a gun to their heads, women can’t make any sense. Secondly, violence against women is uncivilized.
What I am suggesting is simply that women spew garbage out the mouth 27/7 because they have no internal filter of fear. That’s because fear is a very manly thing. Without fear, where does a man get his adrenaline to accomplish heroic man-feats of car lifting and lion fighting and tearing trees out by their roots? Redbull? I don’t fucking think so. Without fear would a man think to himself, “maybe I shouldn’t get herpes from this drunk skank”? The answer is no, he would not. That’s why so many women have STD’s and don’t even know it. Because they’re idiots.
Fear is a man’s life compass. Fear is Jiminy fucking Man-Cricket. The fear of looking like a jackass; the fear of getting kicked in the teeth for grabbing some seemingly unattended woman’s boob; fear is what keeps men drawing between the lines at all times and what keeps us preparing for rough weather ahead.
Curiously to none, women are afraid of nothing.
Women and their outrageously inflated confidence — it’s a bit like the eight year old who won the spelling bee for correctly guessing establishment.
Yes, we’re all very impressed, son; but you’ll still feel like a jackass if I pour this punch all over the front of your pants like you pissed yourself, won’t you. That’s life, kid. Best shut your fucking mouth and swallow that lump in your throat.
Related Articles:
October 2nd, 2007 at 6:48 am - IP Man-Hash: 2385f3847dc8b
Note how responsibility is dismissed rather than taken ownership of.
You can bet your left nut that this Y-def was NOT the one who got to fix the door that her stupidity broke. Some guy would have done it.
Even when they don’t say it, women still admit that they refuse to take responsibility for anything…oh well.
Quicksand.
October 19th, 2007 at 4:41 pm - IP Man-Hash: 47e070fd87755
HEY, I HAVE PUNCHED MY OWN MOMMA IN THE FACE. DOES THAT COUNT?!
P Coderch
October 19th, 2007 at 6:27 pm - IP Man-Hash: 2e9b52f9da52f
P Coderch (276)
How clever. A male-impersonator. Somebody call the Film Actor’s Guild, we have a cunt w’it att’tude! Never mind that she’s just a daddy’s money lesbian, nobody knows the binding noose of oppression more than the over-privileged suburbanite princesses. Have you seen the way they let - make, I mean - those little misses exploit their sex on national television on ‘Sweet Sixteen?’
Bye-bye sweetie, sorry I can’t grope your ass on the way out. Enjoy ‘multi-orgasm after orgasm’ as you are being triple-penetrated.
October 19th, 2007 at 6:30 pm - IP Man-Hash: 2e9b52f9da52f
And those black males. Those black men, runnin’ after all them white womyns! Thank God for lynch mobs, thank God for rape allegations, thank God for menstruating HER perfect twat all over the constitution! ALL MEN THINK ABOUT IS SEX I TYPE IN CAPS BECAUSE DADDY TOUCHED ME AT NIGHT AFTER I GOT TIT IMPLANTS!!!
December 2nd, 2007 at 2:52 pm - IP Man-Hash: e24370fe2bb3c
I think that this isn’t even a standable post.
This promotes violence against women, and that is not acceptable to me.
Saying to punch women in the face?
That is going too far, which is amazing singeling one thing out on this website.
But many women get killed a year from husbands, boyfriends, and men that abuse them.
And not all women are idiots.
Maybe the ones that you’ve met, but none that I know of, including myself.
I don’t know why anyone would even praise this idea, I find it sickening
December 9th, 2007 at 4:34 am - IP Man-Hash: f8941f9270a63
YOU ARE A FUCKING MORON. I AM A MAN, YOU DIPSHIT. AND I HAVE BEATEN MY MOM BECAUSE I GENUINELLY HATE WOMEN AND AM NOT A PRETENDER LIKE YOU, WHO IS HERE TO BITCH ABOUT WOMEN NOT BECAUSE YOU REALLY HATE THEM BUT BECAUSE YOU’RE MAD THAT THEY WON’T PUT OUT FOR A LOSER SUCH AS YOURSELF. ALL YOU REALLY WANT IS MORE PUSSY, AND NOT TO SINK WOMEN’S TEETH IN LIKE I WANT.
P Coderch
January 18th, 2008 at 7:04 am - IP Man-Hash: d0d480944d0c9
I think there’s a difference between fear and sense. Fear’s what you feel when something shitty’s either about to, or might happen to you. Maybe you’re gonna catch an ass-whoopin’. It’s one thing to back down from a fight out of sense. “I’ve gotta job interview coming up, I can’t walk in with bruises” or “I’m not trying to get in anymore trouble”. Maybe you just don’t feel that fighting has a place in out advanced society and you’re a peaceful guy. That’s all sense. That’s cool.
But when someone’s beating your head in, and you just lay there and take it. Or, you run away from someone who’s starting shit. That’s fear. Sometimes it’s hard to tell the difference. Sometimes people don’t understand the difference. Some people act like it’s sense, when in reality they’re just scared to fight, and scared to look like a bitch.
Another example: if a car’s coming towards you at 50 miles-per-hour, sense tells you, “move out of the fuckin’ way!”, and so you move out of the way. Fear would say, “cringe and scream until the car hits you,” which sounds like something a woman would do. However, with the extreme situation, it might give you an adrenaline rush. I don’t consider that fear. In fact, with that adrenaline, when the car crashes, I would pull the woman out of the car (because of the shitty driving, I’m going to assume it’s a woman), and slap the shit out of her.
Which brings me to my next point: I prefer slapping women to actually hitting them–which many, many women seem to mistake the difference. A punch is something to pull on someone that causes some sort of threat. I dunno about you, but I’m not threatened by women in the slightest. The beauty of a slap is that it’s meant to use on someone inferior as a means to teach them a lesson (it can also be used on someone who isn’t inferior as a means of disrespect–which is always fun). Now, when a woman is coming at you with a knife, that’s a whole different story. Knock her out.
January 18th, 2008 at 7:09 am - IP Man-Hash: 4b8494f25ae28
You kind of fucked up right there, honeybuns. So much for getting this site shut down - or improving our preconceptions about pasty little girly-girls.
January 18th, 2008 at 7:10 am - IP Man-Hash: 4b8494f25ae28
I agree. Slapping is the way to go - it shows her how pathetic she really is.
January 18th, 2008 at 9:58 pm - IP Man-Hash: cde4d6da17a7a
or there’s this other thing you could do- but you dudes might not like it cuz it’s actually kind of…sweet:
my guy has this thing where he whacks me on the forehead. right smack dab in the middle of my forehead. with an open hand. mostly his fingers i guess…
THWAPPP!
that’s the sound it makes
THWAPPP!
whenever i’m being a smart-ass
or i’m off on some tangent
or i’m saying negative stuff about myself
THWAPPP!
we have rules about it
he absolutely doesn’t do it out of anger
and if we’re in an argument and talking about breaking up- he can’t do it then, either
but otherwise if we’re hanging out and i say something smart assed or bitchy, or most often something negative about myself, he whacks me on the head.
THWAPPP!
and i smile.
except sometimes he’ll sort of miss or the
thwappp
won’t be quite right and i’ll tilt my head and look at him and
THWAPPP!
it’s perfect.
very centering.
January 18th, 2008 at 10:04 pm - IP Man-Hash: 0a379370a5fd8
Uhhhh……….did you say anything moron or were you just letting the air out of your basketball-like head?
Oh, never mind, the fish smell answers the question…….
Yes, I can see how you would think it sweet, since being slow…….
but then again, beating a dog for shitting on the carpet doesn’t mean the dog gets it right off either.
January 18th, 2008 at 10:20 pm - IP Man-Hash: cde4d6da17a7a
@King wang-
dude, you’re not a chauvinist or a sexist or a rightest or a misogynist or anything but
re
tar
ded
seriously…
the experience i describe, that i live, is fucking
perfect
you couldn’t even begin to grasp it
March 29th, 2008 at 7:21 am - IP Man-Hash: 271ca43bb0c55
Stacking books in Border’s for 2 cents an hour with your ’status’-bestowing liberal arts degree?
March 29th, 2008 at 8:07 am - IP Man-Hash: 5c8336b56fb06
@Muzalon- that’s the weirdest and wrongest assumption i’ve seen anyone make around here. and that’s saying a lot. you must be bored if you’re trolling for months old comments to respond to.
March 29th, 2008 at 8:14 am - IP Man-Hash: fe5b16cfd5f57
@Muzalon- if your bored, you can help me determine the veracity of this statement of CS. Ive got the statistics book out and looking up primary references.
There are multiple ways in which to conceptualize the lesser intelligence of the human female. The best way to comprehend female intellectual inferiority to the superior mental capacity of the male gender is by constructing a statistical generalization based on the relative probability of trait distribution within a given population demographic. There are two fundamental operationalizations around which gravitate those statistical polarities synthesized from the standard gaussian distribution of sexual dimorphism in human intelligence; the first serves as an important basis upon which the typical gaussian distribution of gender-based differences in mental capacity rests. This can be readily observed in its primary function as being a scientific methodology which generates both an epistemological praxis and workable data on the basis of objective statistical and empirical information. A second function that needs to be emphasized is that such a mathematical tool also serves as a means of conducting a rigorous analysis of corresponding normal distribution curves whose final pupose is to calculate the relative probabilities which determine the likelihood of the average male being more intelligent than the average female and vice versa. This is achieved by standardizing the product of the raw score subtracted from its population mean and than further dividing the product by the standard deviation. The final step involves converting the end result into a z-score or standardized variable as statistically computed from a standard normal distribution table and than subsequently expressing the result as a percentage of the pattern of continuous probability distribution. The analytical process itself functions as an underlying computational methodology which enables us to fully grasp the fact that the average male has significantly greater levels of ‘g’ than the average female; it is this process which highlights the fact that this can only be done by gaining an exact knowledge of what is the relative probability that the average male has significantly higher levels of intelligence than the human female. To be fair, the body of statistical data used for constructing such a level of probability shall be the gaussian distribution of male-female differences in mental capacity provided by the WISC-R, a test specifically designed to assess the intelligence of children between the ages of 6 - 16.5. It is also an IQ test notorious for furnishing experimenters with one of the most conservative measures of sexual dimorphism in human intelligence; the overall format of the test is structured in such a way as to largely lean in the direction of minimizing sex differences. Another important aspect of the data collected from the administration of the WISC-R is that the test is generally designed to assess the ‘g’ of solely of the developing child; although male intellectual capacity may be closer to the female in childhood, the gap in intelligence between both male and female genders widens by up to 10 points as the juvenile gradually matures into adulthood. In addition, it is also important to point out that, with the onset of old age, the average female IQ declines at a much more rapid pace than the male.
The data furnished by the WISC-R is converted into a z-value by means of standardizing the raw scores. This is done by statistically computing them on the basis of a standard normal distribution table. The equation that expresses this function is:
Z = X - mu / sigma, where Z represents the z-score, mu represents the mean population distribution, and sigma symbolizes the standard deviation of the continuous probability distribution of X. This is ultimately calculated by converting the end result into the z-values of the standard normal statistical tables, and than finally expressing the figure as a percentage of the probability of X.
A further, much more practical example is needed in order to fully elucidate this point. For the purposes of instruction, our mathematical calculation of the probability that the average man will be considerably more intelligent than the average female and vice versa shall be directly based on the raw data gathered by the WISC-R. The subsequent equation will look thus:
103.08 - 101.41 / 13.55 = 0.123 = 0.4510535 = 0.45 = 45%
This equation expresses the fact that the probability of the average woman being more intelligent than the average man is 0.45. Expressed as a percentage of its own probability distribution, it indicates that 45% of the female population demographic will be smarter than 100% of the male population demographic.
101.41 - 103.08 / 14.54 = - 0.115 = 05457775 = 0.55 = 55%
The solution of this equation expresses the fact that the average man has a 55% probability of being considerably more intelligent than the average female; this means that 55% of males will be substantially more intelligent than 100% of the female population demographic.
If the values provided by the more liberal estimates of Stumpf and Jackson (1994) were substituted into the equation itself, than the probability that the average male is more intelligent than the average female would increase from 55% to approximately 65%; correspondingly, the probability that the average female would be more intelligent than the average male would decrease from 45% to 35%.
In the final analysis, we can see that the notion that the average male is likely to be just as intelligent as the average female is a propagandistic falsehood based on the radical social constructionist interpretive framework of Marxist cultural anthropology. It is impossible to maintain such a ridiculous notion when one recognizes the fact that the average male is about as likely to share equal intelligence with the average female as plants are likely to share the same anatomical structural isomorphism with mammalian species. The statistical tabulation of the probability that males have a 55% chance of having a greater likelihood of being more intelligent than the average female leads to the higher probability that males will be more intelligent than females. This is almost simultaneously translated into average male intelligence being considerably than average levels of female mental capacity.
Thus, if males have a 55% probability of being more intelligent than the average woman and females have a 45% probability of being more intelligent than the average man, it follows that this directly leads, by logical extension, to more average men being significantly more intelligent than greater numbers of average women; the higher the probability that a certain proportion of men will be more intelligent than 100% of women means a substantially larger number of average men who are more intelligent than average women; this in turn leads to higher levels of overall male intelligence in relation to the female.
In short, it is virtually impossible to deny the existence of sexual dimorphism in human intelligence. The above statistical computations yield one conclusion and one conclusion only: it reveals that most men are smart and most women are dumber than shit is an irrefutable fact of the logic of scientific inquiry.
March 29th, 2008 at 10:10 am - IP Man-Hash: 4b8494f25ae28
Hence, we have proof that manhole is indeed dead-set on the elimination of our mindset, and yet she proves a valuable resource to our cause. Hence, we may observe depravity in its purist form - knowing nothing and thinking that she knows everything.
She won’t admit it, but all she does is drive around to ’scramble’ her IP address. She’s a real loser - she literally devotes her life to eliminating information, public information - in short, she believes she must know what is best for everyone and hence believes she is entitled to strip away our human rights.
While she is hardly dangerous alone, there are a lot of subhumans like her in this world. A lot of failures who will stop at nothing to prove a point, make a statement, anything to draw attention away from that string of handouts and failures they call a life. If you treat this vocal minority as equals, they will demand to be treated as superiors. Rather, we must merely judge them by their character - in short, be as much God-like as possible in our patience and serenity.
Do not bother yourselves with your inferiors. Rather, remember that if she is a prostitute, she is a sex toy but a sex toy with the nuclear football. Don’t treat her like the whore she is, treat her like garbage, to be ignored, interrupted, and most certainly not worth a second of your time.
After all, why take any risk with an American whore? We all know that there are 1st world countries that will allow you to treat a slut like a manhole, so why bother with any feminist archaic laws? They’re inferior, don’t worry about those failures.
They’re like Joan, scared and naked. I have difficulty putting this into words…
Look at this evidence - you know that this is what you will get, more often than not, when you date someone from the US, Canada, UK, etc - anyplace which is still recovering from the fad of feminism:
http://salmonofdoubt.110mb.com/gay.txt
That’s right.
March 29th, 2008 at 10:21 am - IP Man-Hash: 4b8494f25ae28
If you believe that you can set the bar low enough for a manhole, just look at this. This - and you all know it, anyone who is reading - more often than not, this is what you wind up with when you meet an American girl. You know for a fact that she’s going to have more or less of this mindset scarred into that lump of fermented brine she calls a brain.
Something actually wrote this. I can’t stress this enough, we are the right ones here - this is not left vs right, Dem vs Rep, US vs NK - this is black-and-white good-and-evil. Yes, there are some radicals here, but then do you really know if they aren’t just another manhole, michael, REALMAN, or PC? Feminists truly are willing to go through all of that trouble to make some point that everyone stopped caring about a few hours, days, weeks, or years ago.
They are that stupid. We can’t allow these people the power they reign over the many intelligent, superior intellects they repress. Look at a textbook - how many contradictions do you see? If you see a single inherent contradiction, that textbook should not have ever been published. Its only good use is as a curiosity piece, a window into a confused and awkward time.
The point is that you see radical and stupid views here, but then can you really trust them to represent our audience? More likely than not, they are just some manhole attempting to sabotage our cause. There are people who really are that shitty, that god-awful, who get a free ride in life and want more, more, MORE - they don’t know why, they just have to have only the best, only this, not that.
They’re fucking dipshits, and they are the ones you ‘worship’ every day by resisting the overwhelming temptation to laugh at their absurdity.
March 29th, 2008 at 10:21 am - IP Man-Hash: 189d7c092be2b
It would all make sense if there was agreed criteron with which to measure intelligence. Unfortunately for these comfortable statistics, there are aspects to human intelligence that haven’t been formularised. For example the intelligence to step back and realise that huge blocks of verbose text is boring for other people to read - i.e. - social sensitivity.
March 29th, 2008 at 10:27 am - IP Man-Hash: 4b8494f25ae28
Agent, you have talked about raping men. Stop representing your beliefs here unless you are some reverse-psychology scholar who is building deserved resentment against the stupid. Heh, the radical ideology that they should be the ones euthanized for once.
But we know you aren’t, and you know you’re wrong, so I won’t try to make sense of how tits make you better than me; and then your spirituality makes you so fucking obsessed with your body.
Your material body, which you can’t take with you when you die. You keep talking about your cunt and how much western garbage a man has to cover his nose over.
Really, these imbeciles - they’re in our colleges, our politics, our schools. They’re out making things shit for the rest of the world and they keep saying they’re doing the right thing, which makes sense when your logic is what is good for you is good and what is bad for you is evil.
March 29th, 2008 at 10:27 am - IP Man-Hash: 60b9632657c7c
There is. It’s called a bank account.
-Dick