When Women Should Shut the Fuck Up

People are always asking me what the qualities of the perfect wife are. Mostly men. That’s because women don’t give a fuck about what makes a perfect wife.

Have you ever seen a “romantic” comedy? I say “romantic” because what it should be is “woman” comedy — and by woman I mean “shitty” or “not a”. Those bullshit movies are all about how horrible and fucking stupid women can behave whilst the right thing to do is staring them in face like a Stop sign, and how some poor schmuck with a job that lets him loaf around town all day doing nothing can be guilted into putting up with getting fucked over for two hours and calling a spade with a shrew nose a fucking prize pig by the end of it all.

Maybe instead of romantic comedies they should be called documentaries.

The perfect wife is one who knows when to shut the fuck up. That’s it. I think Indiana Jones said it best.

“You’re insulting them and you’re embarrassing me.” -Indiana Jones

That’s all women do when they speak: insult and embarrass; them and me respectively. That’s why the perfect wife just has to know when to shut the fuck up. I’ve always said women are like works of art. Even if they’re atrocious and moody (which they mostly are) they can be enjoyed because you can look away or close your eyes whenever you’re done with them.

For some help on this topic, here’s my helpful set of rules for women on knowing when the fuck to shut the fuck up. I call it Dick’s Guide On The Prudence Of Women Shutting The Fuck Up.

1. Shut up when a man is talking or when a man starts to talk.
2. Shut up when a man stops talking suddenly.

That first rule is a man-obvious one, even wild animals follow it. The second, however, is the key to the perfect wife. It’s the extra mile. See, when a woman is speaking and insulting and embarrassing everyone, the man she’s with will likely stop speaking from insult or embarrassment. It happens every day. I used to be a bartender so you can trust me on that one.

Imagine you’re at a cricket match. You don’t know how the game works because fucking no one does, but you know when to cheer and when to leave. It’s because everyone else is doing it. That’s all I’m saying here. Women don’t know how to speak or be civilized. It’s like cricket to them. Women just need to take their cues on shutting the fuck up from everyone else. There’s nothing wrong with that. It’s smart (womanly speaking).

Let me put it like this. You know how we have toilets as a species? That’s because running around shitting all over ourselves and sleeping in it is for animals, not for humans. Humans doing it would be embarrassing. When women speak it’s exactly the same thing. It makes all men feel a little less human. It reminds us that yes, we too were once running around shitting all over ourselves and trying to eat fucking rocks or some stupid shit like that — something nearly as stupid as a twenty minute conversation on why American football is “practically the same game” that football is in the rest of the world.

What the fuck?

Related Articles:

RSS feed | Trackback URI

205 Comments in 205 threads.»

Pages: « 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 [4] 3 2 1 » Show All

Comment by Irlandes (Anonymous age 64)
2006-12-17 13:34:40

Ana said:

Wow! You have issues don’t you? Why so much anger? When we lash out and make these gross generalizations about a gender or race, not only is it incredibly stupid, it is sad. What are you lacking that makes you such an angry, intolerant, harsh person? It takes maturity, self-control and generosity to be in a good relationship. Take a good, hard look at yourself, is this who you really want to be? You are truly frightening! I don’t think men are better than women or women are better than men. That is an argument that should have ended in 7th grade. Partners/spouses need to honor and listen to each other, not compete. You cannot have a wife with your attitude. You want obedience, you want to command. Get a dog. No, get a robot and do the dog a favor.

Wrong, Ana. He sure enough can have a wife like he wants. She won’t have English as a native language, though. Google for “marriage strike”. You English speaking fiends have priced yourselves out of the market. A full 22% of marriageable men have stated they will never marry an Ameriskank.

For forty years, you fiends have done every nasty thing to men you can think of. Said every nasty thing you can think of. When men have finally noticed and start answering back, how pious you get. Barfff!!!

Did you know that U.S. men marrying Russian wives have an average income of $100,000? Hee, hee.

 
2006-12-16 13:05:50

well me and my friends were readin this hilarious point of view and comments back and we think melissa is a lyin peice of shit. she’s only 13 years old wat the fuck is she gonna kno. Us men r obvioulsy superioir in practically every way possible so she jus needs to shut the fuck up, go back to school, and become the neighborhood whore cuz that’s all women r good for.
men > women

 
Comment by son of the suns
2006-12-12 06:33:51

You don’t know anything, Manwhore.

Fuck off the site.

 
Comment by Billy
2006-12-12 02:20:53

Women never ever wanted equal rights..
No.. they just begged for more privileges.

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-12-12 01:54:07

@gwallan
@manwoman Actually I’m quite aware that that was the claimed goal of feminism in early days. And I’m sure some believed it. I certainly used to.

ManWoman said:
I’d like to clarify something you probably don’t know, and if you take some look at political history,

While I appreciate the effort, I think if you look at what I’ve written on this site and elsewhere, an ignorance of history — especially political history — is not one of my shortcomings.

But looking at the motives (and outright lies) of people like Betty Friedan; even looking at gwallan’s comments on the white feather brigade, I’m not so sure. (Of course: when do you define feminism as having begun? With the suffragettes? With The Feminine Mystique?) Simply for another example, looking at the many-decades long distortion of the DV issue, including the vicious silencing of women speaking the truth, one has trouble viewing this as a recent aberration.

In any event, the manophobic doctrines of modern feminism are pretty clear. And while there are people such as Camille Paglia (and perhaps even Tammy Bruce) who have some interesting things to say, I think it’s bending the term “out-of-context” too far out of context to suggest that modern feminism does not have as goals hating and slamming men.

Regards,
-wolfe

 
Comment by ManWoman
2006-12-12 00:12:57


wolfe said:

ManWoman said:
Exactly like how some feminist agree-ers start taking it out of context and just downright slam men

Actually, I’m not so sure that feminists ‘agree-ers’ needed to take anything of feminism out of context to slam and hate men.

-wolfe

***
I’d like to clarify something you probably don’t know, and if you take some look at political history, you will understand that feminism is ORIGINALLY started up to claim equality in women’s rights. There is nothing wrong with seeing s/th wrong in politics and striking it. And THEN some ppl started making feminism into this type thing of hating and slamming men - which is completely hypocritical. That’s what I’m saying by “out of context.”

 
Comment by gwallan
2006-12-11 04:12:31

ManWoman said:

Exactly like how some feminist agree-ers start taking it out of context and just downright slam men

wolfe said:
Actually, I’m not so sure that feminists ‘agree-ers’ needed to take anything of feminism out of context to slam and hate men.

-wolfe

When was feminism ever “in context”? Surely context requires something approaching reality. Otherwise it’s little more than fiction.

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-12-11 01:14:20

ManWoman said:
Exactly like how some feminist agree-ers start taking it out of context and just downright slam men

Actually, I’m not so sure that feminists ‘agree-ers’ needed to take anything of feminism out of context to slam and hate men.

-wolfe

 
Comment by ManWoman
2006-12-10 19:07:43

Dutch269 said:

nadja said:

hi,
felt somewhat compelled to leave a note.
yes, i am girl O_O and i think your site is funny xD, for real.

peace.

Not as funny as seeing yet another clueless bitch who cant read, no pussies allowed here.

Now go clean something…

This site is funny because it offers a refreshing opposite to the feministic views. The author is pretty cool. BUT not all the readers/commenters are. Some of them are extremely bitter lowlifes, making crude uncalled-for comments about women- guys who probably couldn’t figure out why women aren’t attracted to them. Exactly like how some feminist agree-ers start taking it out of context and just downright slam men, and become lesbian. and kind of like how Osama bin laden took a good religion and take out of context, to violence, etc… bad, bad…

 
Comment by Dick Masterson
2006-12-08 18:23:02

Appreciated, Piotr D.

I would wish you good luck on your physics exam, but you’re a man and thus I do not need to.

-Dick

 
Comment by Piotr D
2006-12-08 16:56:34

i LOVE this site!!! I was studying for my quantum physics exam and typed in “fuck physics” and an article poped up from this site and now im home reading most things on it. Its great! Made my day!

Thanks!

 
Comment by Billy
2006-12-06 01:10:15

Bush is the great deciever. He made the regilous follks think he is on their side while he has always been deeply involved in the family religion. Satanism.

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-12-05 23:33:43

@SotS: Disturbingly, I largely agree with you. Especially on the turning the ‘Conservative’ Party into socialists. Religious or otherwise.

On what Sony says: Were it up to the Europeans to keep the peace, we’d be on World War V by now. (That means 5, for those of you educated in San Francisco).

The idea that Sony views China and the US as equally ‘wolves’ in their views on Taiwan is risible.

Here’s where, again, you fail to grasp things, Sony.

China has a legitimate claim on Taiwan. That claim is hardly ‘wolfish’ though her means to get there may be.

Taiwan has a legitimate claim to self-determination and independence, backed, and only partially betrayed by that most brilliant yet unscrupulous of US Presidents, Richard Nixon.

The US wishes peace, order and the preservation of life in the Far East. Scarred by her experiences in Korea, she is understandably reluctant to yield territory to despots, even merely self-styled nominal despots.

For someone who’s never seriously looked closely enough at history (as your words betray you), or the area in question, I find your remarks… curious, Sony.

I am not sure China is a wolf looking at Taiwan. I am sure the US is not.

-wolfe

 
Comment by son of the suns
2006-12-05 11:35:23

“For the foreseeable future, at least.”

Hence I said 50 years. The Republic has lots of wealth and a preponderance of military power that will last a long time.. built up by one’s before the boomers and now being utterly trashed by the boomers in high office.

Our first boomer presidents - Clinton and Bush II. One was an adulterous degenerate who fought pointless European wars to distract the media from his cock, while lobbing cruise missiles at the tents of our true enemies. The other, has fought as an impressive War on Terror was one can imagine given the lack of readiness and preperation for such a venture. Too bad he thinks guns and butter go hand in hand, and has turned the “Conservative” party into a band of religious socialists.

 
Comment by Billy
2006-12-05 11:29:30

Taiwan Air

They have one..

-Creed - One

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-12-05 10:21:45

What is the European race? Ethnically, Europe is quite a heterogenetic place, though the majority of inhabitants are what one might call caucasians.

Aside from Taiwan, I doubt anyone has very much to fear, other than from an economical/commerce/environmental point of view, from China. For the foreseeable future, at least.

Though Taiwan is arguably technically and rightfully the ethnic Taiwanese’s (Han Chinese - 84%) its situation is akin to that of a sheep being guarded by two, quite sizable, wolves. The propping up, fattening wolf and the drooling wolf. Of course, no one, except the ethnic Taiwanese, would give a rat’s ass about the island. And no one ever did for quite some time. Except when the sheep’s Fleece turned gilded.

Now, America has undoubtedly made it quite clear to the somewhat thick local government not to dare antagonize Mainland China further by declaring independence. So Taiwan will likely never declare Independence and China would probably do nothing manifestly ostentatious even if it did, though it could a hell of a lot on rather short notice, especially since, to the best of my knowledge, Taiwan hasn’t even got an established airforce.

My own conjecture is that the two wolves and the sheep are all putting on a little ongoing play in cahoots for the viewing pleasure of the world’s stock markets.

After all, the motto is “Make trade, not war!” It’s all a matter of closed door negotiations on trade tariffs, quotas and restrictions. Whenever China doesn’t like the way things are progressing, she resorts to the tried and tested technique of scaring American (and not only) stock holders senseless.

That’s the trouble with capitalist empires, really. Evil, communist states have got you by the balls of your share holders.

America, on the other hand, has her precious dollars and WTO in her pocket and retaliates on Chinese imports.

And so on, and so forth.

The first and final, world government? At odds between China and the WTO.

God help us, either way.

- Mousse T - Horny

 
Comment by son of the suns
2006-12-05 00:28:51

beta_males_unite said:

Matriarchal socialism ie “feminism” has turned the Western world into a whore factory.

These little girls are so disgusting from such an early age - they have no respect for themselves and certainly no respect for their poor fathers, brothers and sons who alone will have to bear the shame. The little sluts just continue on their merry way to becoming bastard egg laying welfare queens - just like their piggish mothers before them. Mommy the cummie commie.

And the West wonders why the Islamic world laughs at us. Putting all else aside - at the end of the day at least their women respect them.

Kill feminism = save the European race and all Western peoples. Let it continue and in 50 years we will be slaves to Allah or Mao.

Rest I must..

 
Comment by beta_males_unite
2006-12-04 22:57:32

Matriarchal socialism ie “feminism” has turned the Western world into a whore factory.

These little girls are so disgusting from such an early age - they have no respect for themselves and certainly no respect for their poor fathers, brothers and sons who alone will have to bear the shame. The little sluts just continue on their merry way to becoming bastard egg laying welfare queens - just like their piggish mothers before them. Mommy the cummie commie.

And the West wonders why the Islamic world laughs at us. Putting all else aside - at the end of the day at least their women respect them.

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-12-04 22:13:11

“Procrasinating couches”?

I fully believe you’re 13. Good advice you expended there, for your own self though: watch less telly and pick up a book for goodness’ sake.

Lest you grow up to be pro-crasinine.

- Xzibit - Alkaholik

 
Comment by Billy
2006-12-04 21:39:24

melissa said:
And fyi, I’m thirteen. And if I’m already this intelligent to see that you all are just wasting your lives being on your damn comp talking about your perfecto mundo dream wifeh, and not actually looking. Then that is a bit sad on behalf of all of your parts. You people disgust me.

13 huh?
Well it’s sad for you but you’re through maturing.
You’ve already learned all you will ever learn in this life.
You should just get your barbies out and leave the conversation to grown ups.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment may take some time to appear.


Close
E-mail It
Powered by ShareThis