When Women Should Shut the Fuck Up
People are always asking me what the qualities of the perfect wife are. Mostly men. That’s because women don’t give a fuck about what makes a perfect wife.
Have you ever seen a “romantic” comedy? I say “romantic” because what it should be is “woman” comedy — and by woman I mean “shitty” or “not a”. Those bullshit movies are all about how horrible and fucking stupid women can behave whilst the right thing to do is staring them in face like a Stop sign, and how some poor schmuck with a job that lets him loaf around town all day doing nothing can be guilted into putting up with getting fucked over for two hours and calling a spade with a shrew nose a fucking prize pig by the end of it all.
Maybe instead of romantic comedies they should be called documentaries.
The perfect wife is one who knows when to shut the fuck up. That’s it. I think Indiana Jones said it best.
“You’re insulting them and you’re embarrassing me.” -Indiana Jones
That’s all women do when they speak: insult and embarrass; them and me respectively. That’s why the perfect wife just has to know when to shut the fuck up. I’ve always said women are like works of art. Even if they’re atrocious and moody (which they mostly are) they can be enjoyed because you can look away or close your eyes whenever you’re done with them.
For some help on this topic, here’s my helpful set of rules for women on knowing when the fuck to shut the fuck up. I call it Dick’s Guide On The Prudence Of Women Shutting The Fuck Up.
1. Shut up when a man is talking or when a man starts to talk.
2. Shut up when a man stops talking suddenly.
That first rule is a man-obvious one, even wild animals follow it. The second, however, is the key to the perfect wife. It’s the extra mile. See, when a woman is speaking and insulting and embarrassing everyone, the man she’s with will likely stop speaking from insult or embarrassment. It happens every day. I used to be a bartender so you can trust me on that one.
Imagine you’re at a cricket match. You don’t know how the game works because fucking no one does, but you know when to cheer and when to leave. It’s because everyone else is doing it. That’s all I’m saying here. Women don’t know how to speak or be civilized. It’s like cricket to them. Women just need to take their cues on shutting the fuck up from everyone else. There’s nothing wrong with that. It’s smart (womanly speaking).
Let me put it like this. You know how we have toilets as a species? That’s because running around shitting all over ourselves and sleeping in it is for animals, not for humans. Humans doing it would be embarrassing. When women speak it’s exactly the same thing. It makes all men feel a little less human. It reminds us that yes, we too were once running around shitting all over ourselves and trying to eat fucking rocks or some stupid shit like that — something nearly as stupid as a twenty minute conversation on why American football is “practically the same game” that football is in the rest of the world.
What the fuck?
Related Articles:
December 28th, 2006 at 5:49 pm - IP Man-Hash: 60ad64c216b43
Luka
Who’s land has has cameras on every street corner and, has abandoned local government for a continental state, and doesn’t even allow their peasants to be armed? Mine or yours?
Linking to a bunch of moonbat websites authored by a bunch of derelicts too clinically obese and paranoid to know the forest for the trees… how womanly.
Those sites are written by people with little wit and high paranoia, who’s great intellects should be writing sketches for shit comedy shows and fucking off politics. There’s a deep darkness in the American left, and they’ll do lie like the devil to defame anything they see as good. They’re violently angry that we have a President not afraid to defend us with boots on the ground, doesn’t follow polls, and doesn’t cheat on his wife. All these scum view any moral man in public life as an enemy that must be crucified by any means neccessary.
December 28th, 2006 at 8:25 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5fdb78f644952
@Luka briefly, yes, Europe isn’t a federal state yet. We could have an intelligent discussion on the Club of Rome and Treaty of Rome, and many other things, but not here.
Luka, you’re wrecking your argument. Those are mostly nutty people using ad-hominem attacks. Bush is evil ACK! run, flee!
SotS is right about several core things:
-you live in a surveillance society where cameras proliferate. This society doesn’t appear to be very safe.
(He’s wrong about you abandoning local gov’t for a continental state… SO FAR).
-he’s right about the nutty weird crap you are linking too. Seriously.
-we can objectively discuss whether or not Gitmo prisoners are victims of a police state (they aren’t), or renditions/East European holding prisons are ‘police state’ behaviors (they may be). To suggest that the US is a fascist state? When even the leaked surveillance stuff is far far milder than what the UK and France routinely do? Please. Get real.
Luka, normally, you have a good point. On this you seem to be hung up in procedural issues. And mostly wrong on those, unless you really, really, want to debate police state, in which case, ok, but this is not the place.
What is your point?
-wolfe
December 28th, 2006 at 8:28 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5fdb78f644952
I hasten to add: Luka didn’t use the ‘fascist state’ line to characterize the US. I withdraw it completely; I was typing faster than I was thinking. She’s still wrong, IMO tho.
My point remains: she linked to sites that characterize the US in that fashion, and do so with no real thought, especially relative to Europe.
In other words, she seems to link to parochial sites on this one thing.
And I’ve great respect for Luka. But I think she’s wrong on some of this.
-wolfe
December 29th, 2006 at 3:56 am - IP Man-Hash: 257b5d432428d
Yep. Arguments and politics are adopted by all evil and the route it takes.
Just an opinion~
December 29th, 2006 at 4:10 am - IP Man-Hash: c670e8108de13
For goodness sake, guys, do you actually read my posts or do you just make assumptions about them and then respond?
I think both of you foolishly jumped to the conclusion “she linked to these sites therefore she agrees with them” … no I do not agree with them at all, never suggested that I did, never argued in support of them, so your comments are completely off the mark in most respects. I did provide them to prove a point, though, and I only hinted at that point because I wanted to see what you thought of the links first, before I made it.
My point is this: it is far too easy to believe some paranoid twit who writes about “a police state” in another continent (i.e Europe), but when applied to your own (the US) it is written by nutcases. I don’t think the people who write or make claims about a police state in Europe are any less paranoid than those who suggest the same of the US. In other words, I don’t think there is a police state in the US or in Europe, not least because one cannot consider Europe to be a state, per se.
Also, let me just make a point that the definition of a “police state” is not really the same as a surveillance society. To connect the issue of surveillance cameras to a police state is accepting a vision of Orwell’s 1984 a little too far. I do not deny that the UK, for example, has an issue with the level of surveillance cameras around, but to use this to suggest that European countries live in a police state is being nothing short of ridiculous.
According to Wikipedia a police state is defined as follows:-
I know that the UK, for example, has many problems, I also know that grave mistakes have been made by both the police and the government, but to go so far as to suggest that Britain lives in fear of the police, or that we live in a dictatorship is far fetched.
And as for sots asinine argument about peasants about not being allowed to take up arms, do you still live in the 18th Century?
December 29th, 2006 at 8:18 am - IP Man-Hash: e64b9986751d8
“and as for sots asinine argument about peasants about not being allowed to take up arms, do you still live in the 18th Century?”
No, but apprently Europe does. I consider anyone who is barred by their state to be armed to be a peasant. It’s an apt description.
And how womanly to play semantics about if a survalliance society is really a police state? Orwell had some powerful insights about women in 1984, and you represent them well. I guess as long as you can get knocked up and live for free in Britian(as in the USA), whores are happy. Who cares about freedom? It’s as far from your estrogen memory cell as anything.
December 29th, 2006 at 9:18 am - IP Man-Hash: 479ab57a00cdd
Women don’t like average men to be armed because this means “naturally” weak or moral men will be able to defend themseves equally against “naturally” strong or immoral men - it is an equalizer. To the female brain guns are simply like cosmetic or unnatural power - they rather the weak/good men be their sexless cuckold servants/drones where they belong.
December 29th, 2006 at 9:36 am - IP Man-Hash: 734def3a21a2c
100% on target.
Women see guns as the dark side, unnatural equalizing power for those men her and the physically superior alpha male should be ruling over. Females see ectomorphic men with firearms as an abomination of nature, and truthfully so. The natural order is disgusting, and without technology we’d be serfs. Alpha thugs don’t need guns because they’re physically gifted enough to rule with fist or blades, as the thousands of English cops stabbed through their body armor proves.
But don’t let our logic get in the way of their feminist dream state. Those cop stabbers are just misguided youth, poverty made them do it. And if they’re in jail or shot dead by a properly armed citizenry.. how can they be impregnating the femcows with their superior genes?
December 29th, 2006 at 12:05 pm - IP Man-Hash: c670e8108de13
It actually makes sense to use the correct terminology if you are going to state something, sots. It is common sense, not just a case of semantics.
You said that Europe is a police state. It isn’t. You can attack me and my gender but it doesn’t change the fact that what you said is completely inaccurate. Europe cannot be defined as a state, and a police state is not a synonym for a survelliance society. Take it or leave it.
December 29th, 2006 at 1:00 pm - IP Man-Hash: 8b92a9ed37775
You’re wrong.
Accept it or fuck off.
Just because all women are whores who get wet at the thought of a powerful city worker watching them on camera, doesn’t mean it’s not a police state. It just means it’s a police state you like. Because you’re a peabrained incubator.
December 29th, 2006 at 3:03 pm - IP Man-Hash: 23500eaac44c3
Danielle said:
Tolerance, that is one thing, cowering like a whipped dog, the lack of Honor, Valor, Integrity, Discipline, and Strength in young men today is another. Feminists attempt to erase the differences between men and women as though differences alone make one inferior. Yet it is our differences that make us desirable to one another. So, feminists use the media to belittle, berate, demean and rebuke men who act as men and then portray us as imbeciles, fools, cowards and yet then have the audacity to ask “Where are all the ‘real’ men?� Feminism is I believe a Latin word meaning “blight on humanity.�
- Oldone
December 29th, 2006 at 3:20 pm - IP Man-Hash: c670e8108de13
Perhaps you are just jealous you cannot wank off whilst watching whores on camera in the US? I’m wrong? At least I don’t think Europe is a state. Get a clue.
December 29th, 2006 at 3:31 pm - IP Man-Hash: 9be1e00d089c7
Perhaps you are just jealous you cannot wank off whilst watching whores on camera in the US? I’m wrong? At least I don’t think Europe is a state. Get a clue.
Your anger is showing Luka. I don’t wank off to mediocre looking western women trolling the streets for attention or wasting their husband’s money, I wank off to professional whores who are more altruistic than you.
You can say Europe isn’t a state all you want, it doesn’t change the fact that the EU is a growing far off power that will soon dominate you, because if your weak people allow a survalliance state to form then you’re so lost you’re not worth saving.
Is it tea time yet? Perhaps you should fuck off and go see. Your masters want the caffeine flowing through you in a nice, suggestable state of mind when they put cameras in your bedroom. That way when you bring back some strange man from the “pub”, you’ll have proof that he raped you.(or didn’t).
December 29th, 2006 at 3:43 pm - IP Man-Hash: c670e8108de13
Oh, no sots I’m not angry, I don’t actually take this place seriously enough to get angry.
I don’t mean any insult but some of what you write is hilarious… you really do have a zany view on life at times, what you write isn’t completely inaccurate, but it is always taken to the extremes and I just find it funny. Its sometimes worth getting into these discussions with you just to see what you come out with.
I have been meaning to ask…what, pray tell, is survalliance…?
December 29th, 2006 at 3:47 pm - IP Man-Hash: 9be1e00d089c7
I know full well when you’re angry.
It’s called passive aggressivism, and it’s what “smart women” do when they’re pissed off. It usually involves saying you don’t care, while simaltaneously arguing bullshit semantics to make you look smart. You know, since you have no valid reasons of wide spread monitoring of citizenry is acceptable. But I guess you’re so smart you don’t need to explain it, since you know Europe is a continent.
December 29th, 2006 at 3:50 pm - IP Man-Hash: c670e8108de13
Now, now…sots. Temper, temper. It’s one thing to muck about and attack me in public forum, but it is sneaky and petty to get the stage where you feel you have to attack me in private.
If you got something to say, say it here.
Happy New Year!
December 29th, 2006 at 3:54 pm - IP Man-Hash: 9be1e00d089c7
I’ve attacked you in both and don’t give a fuck.
You’re still too slow to explain why you think it’s wonderful to have cameras everywhere in your homeland.
December 29th, 2006 at 3:56 pm - IP Man-Hash: c670e8108de13
Where did I say that I think it is wonderful to have cameras everywhere in my homeland?
December 29th, 2006 at 4:01 pm - IP Man-Hash: 9be1e00d089c7
I’m just assuming such because you’ve been so busy bragging that you learned in 3rd grade that one of the continents is Europe, that you haven’t defended it.
December 29th, 2006 at 4:02 pm - IP Man-Hash: c670e8108de13
Answer the question sots. Did I ever say that I think it is wonderful to have cameras everywhere in my homeland? Yes or no.