Who’s Afraid of the Manliest Man
I’m going to conclude my week’s presentation of the world’s manliest man men with the manliest man man of all.
You.
You’re a man and that means you have a dick and balls (most probably). It also means you have that in common with every other great person in history who’s ever done a fucking thing. How awesome is that! Women can’t say shit like that. The only thing women share traits with is a cheeseburger. I think we all know what I’m talking about. I’m talking about cows and women being like them. Cheeseburgers are made from cows.
As a man, did you know that you have collectively fucked over 10 billion women? That’s because you’re a man and you share. Some of them were super hot and for that you get a thousand Man Points. Some of them were ugly as shit too, which only gives you ten thousand Man Points. You’re a man. You can’t lose.
Women don’t share shit. Women compete like jackals over every little thing in their fucking lives. Have you ever seen a woman gloat an engagement ring over her harpy, fat-fuck friends? Disgusting. And women who agree and think it’s disgusting also are even more fucking disgusting for selling out their own. Go fuck yourselves, female misogynists.
If it were the other way around and women had to buy men engagement rings, then men would sell them and buy beer for all their man friends because jewels are silly and stupid and are also mined by slaves.
You know who abolished African slavery like 200 years ago? Men did. That means you also did because you’re a man. That’s how it works. Ask a feminist. She’ll tell you between shoving bear crawlers down her flabby fuck-off throat and regaling you with retarded anecdotes about her pet shit-rat named Frumpy Shits or some stupid ass thing. Women can’t name dogs for shit.
Women build their whole lives around Africans being slaves. Do some research into diamonds before you say ‘I do’. Or just consult the manliest man you know: yourself.
All men know anything and everything about all things that they’ve ever done. That’s why men don’t have to think about anything. That’s why you don’t even have to think to know that I know what I’m talking about; because you’re the manliest man who has ever been.
I’m also just man-joking. The manliest man in the world is Kenny Powers. He broke his back jumping the St. Lawrence River in a Lincoln Continental with a jet strapped to the boot.
He made it with ten miles to spare.
See the jump (only if you’re a man)
Related Articles:
Pages: [3] 2 1 » Show All
@ondine:Females only deserve the right to equal prize money if they have the ability to compete with men.Which they DONT.Lets face it,men are far better at sports,any physical work like construction,at business and overall intelligence.If you want a couple of reasons on females being better than men Id say nagging,on a more serious note females are better at showing off their emotions like love for something/their kids etc.
I do agree you are a woman with logic and are not some dumb cunt who resorts to shaming tactics.But if you look at life over the past 4000 yrs,you yourself can see why men are superior to women.
Chris AND MarkEMark=Mr. Empty-pants
Отличный и занимательный блог! Закоренелый житель моего RSS ридера :)
Holy shit, that rocket car is the coolest thing I’ve ever seen!
What a great article, it’s funny, it’s witty. It made me chuckle.
You’re the man Dick.
You’re the man.
This is one of those posts I don’t agree with. I can fully agree that men, as a group, are born with the ability to be better than women, as a group. It’s simple genetics, and they can be proven with facts. Men are born with higher IQs, more muscle mass, etc.
But being male alone does not make you superior, or inferior, to women. It is what you do with your natural abilities that can make you superior. The most determined woman can eaisly be better than a lazy, unaccomplished man. He very well may have more potential than that woman, but what is he doing to succeed?
Men who work hard and live up to their fullest potential have every right to claim they are better than women because I’m sure it’s true for 99% of the female gender. Don’t fool yourself into thinking, however, that having a penis automatically makes you superior to every woman in the world. If you disagree, please give me a good reason why.
I think that even the least of men is immeasurably above the most superior woman, in that all men(ALL of us) have a streak of the transcendent in all of us. That cannot be truly said of any woman. It is for this very reason that there has never been a female genius, and there never will be one. That has been my observation.
What I said perhaps needs to be explained in greater detail. But I will say this: I do not wish to be confused with the people who say that women are equable to animals. They are not, and shouldn’t be regarded as such. Also, women of conspicuous ability are not to be regarded as morbid specimens, but as individuals.
We hold a woman responsible for a crime she commits – that is enough reason to consider her as human being and individual, if not ones equal.
So are you saying that by simply HAVING a “streak of the transcendent” in you and not USING this gift in any way still makes you superior to a woman, even if she works to her fullest potential, solely because she does not, according to you, possess this same gift?
I’ve known plenty of men who have done nothing with their lives and I just can’t accept that they are better than me because they were born male. For instance, my father molested two 12 year-old girls, but he is still better than me because he is male, according to you. I just don’t see any logic in that.
And can you define exactly what you mean by “a streak of the transcendent”.
So are you saying that by simply HAVING a “streak of the transcendent� in you and not USING this gift in any way still makes you superior to a woman, even if she works to her fullest potential, solely because she does not, according to you, possess this same gift?
More or less that. You must take into account that women don’t have that streak at all. Their genetics prevent it. So, simply by possessing that streak, every man has the potential to do a great deed, or create something ingenious. That may not make them necessarily superior to all women, but it gives them the potential to be so.
That’s why I said ‘above’ instead of ’superior’. We are at a better position to start with, in the sense that we have that quality.
I just can’t accept that they are better than me because they were born male.
I know that you can’t. Most men cannot understand it partially or completely. The ones that classify it as misogyny can’t. The ones that say that the lack of this streak makes all men infinitely better/superior than all women, can’t.
And can you define exactly what you mean by “a streak of the transcendent�.
It is the ability to, at least at any one point of our lives, to think beyond our own consciousnesses, and reach a temporal level of introspection while examining oneself, or of others. In other words, it is the ability to look inside our ’souls’, if you will. All men have the ability to do this. Whereas no women truly do.
Some women do very well in some fields, and sometimes many fields, but none of them inherently possess the creative genius and freedom that all men do in some quantity.
Men fail to live up to their potential because they are undermined by the Anglo-American matriarchy and its misandrist agendas. In earlier, patriarchal eras men were utterly transcendent because the parent culture supported and encouraged them.
I disagree. While it is true that the overly matriarchal(meaning overly focused on women) system that feminism has created in the west has reduced the potential of a vast majority of men, while increasing the potential of women by null, it would be very unfair to say that all men in the patriarchal eras were utterly transcendent.
Indeed, a very small percentage of men can be truly counted as geniuses and capable of reaching that potential, hence the elimination of the very rare exceptional(but not genial) women.
However, it is true that in earlier eras genial men were more numerous than they are now, as compared to a population which was much smaller than it is now. I also think that the overall potential of all men have increased since the advent of feminism.
“I also think that the overall potential of all men have *increased since the advent of feminism.”
*decreased
Interesting. Mothers generally like to hold their children BACK – and STOP them from advancing forward. Think of the FEMININE values….
• Feelings are more important than FACTS.
• Are more important than TRUTH.
• Commitment is more important than individuality.
• Safety is more important than fun (or taking risks)
• Children are more important than people.
These are all feminine values that GET MEN NOWHERE.
FATHERS tend to teach their children self-reliance and push them into the world head first…. but its women and mothers how like to hold men BACK.
To succeed greatly in the world, a man just has to be encouraged or DEPROGRAM Himself from this bullshit that EVERY knows is crap when women spew this crap….
• “You know married men live longer”
• “You’re a loser if you’re not married”
Nicole Kidman bet George Clooney $10000 that he would cave and be married by the time he was 40. HE sent the check back and challlenged her to double or nothing for another 10 years.
He’s 47 now.
Women WANT to stop men from fucking who they want, doing what feels good, pushing and propelling forward, succeeding at any cost to himself.
Too bad.
Feminism is in the hands of men who can crush it.
If a man doesn’t subscribe to it – it FAILS.
Menarebetterthanwomen.
Are you aware that families with fathers produce far more successful children, even when factors like poverty are held constant?
Thanks for clarifying, RB. I’m glad you acknowledge the difference between inborn potential and actual success. This subject can actually lead to a whole other argument about whether men are better than women.
The question: Does being born genetically superior make you better than women, or is what a person is able to accomplish in his or her life?
I can understand why a person would believe the first option. The fact that men are biologically superior makes them better than women.
The latter view also makes sense. You are only as good as your contributions to the world and society. If you accept this view, then some women can indeed be better than men.
I personally think that both views hold some truth. But this then goes back to my argument that you can’t PROVE men are better than women. It is all based on individual opinion. Is better determined by potential or actual success? That is a choice the individual must make.
••• “You are only as good as your contributions to the world and society. If you accept this view, then some women can indeed be better than men.”
Do you actually BELIEVE that crap?…….
Or do you just spew it because it SOUNDS good??
Greedy selfish women everywhere need 10 handbags and 50 pairs of shoes…. they want and need engagement rings (but NEVER buy or GIVE one to a man themselves) which are mined by a child slave…. and then she will GET MAD when a man doesn’t buy her one, or doesn’t treat her like a prostitute on Valentine’s Day.
… and let’s not forget the concept of marriage.
MEN CONTRIBUTE MORE TO WOMEN (AND SOCIETY) THAN WOMEN GIVE TO MEN (OR SOCIETY)
Menarebetterthanwomen.
Cute try though sweety.
I was simply presenting two sides to an argument. I never even stated my own opinion, so it isn’t necessary to patronize me by calling me “sweety”.
Men do contribute more to society than women, but some women have achieved great things. Of course, men’s accomplishments greatly outnumber those of women, but some women are still very capable beings.
Also, I am not saying ALL women can be better than ALL men by simply trying their hardest. I was saying that the women who live to their fullest potential could be viewed as superior to a man who has done nothing with his genetic superiority. But, as I said before, this is just one opinion.
For the record, I own four pairs of shoes and one purse, so your generalization about women doesn’t hold true for ALL women. And I once knew a (straight) man who owned over 100 pairs of sneakers.
Does being born genetically superior make you better than women, or is what a person is able to accomplish in his or her life?
To believe that we are superior to another person because of our genetical superiority would be inhuman. But, to compare the accomplishments of one person to another is a complex task, which will encompass far more than whether s/he has worked hard to become a chartered accountant.
We never know what a person’s fullest potential is, and where it leads to.
Chris is right. Even when women do earn enough to support themselves(which is very rare), they take more than give. This leaves out a minuscle percentage of women who actually contribute something to society.
When I speak of accomplishments, I don’t mean whether is it better to be a doctor or a lawyer. Measuring the success of the two would be very complex. What I meant was something a bit more distinguishable. For example, a man who was born with an IQ of 180 is too lazy to do anything with this genetic gift. Perhaps he is a garage-band musician who likes to experiment with drugs. On the other hand, a woman with an IQ of 140 works very hard to become a member of Congress. Is she better than the lazy genius, or is the genius better because he was born smarter? A lot of men on here would say that the man is still infinitely better than the woman. I disagree in this example.
Again, the efforts of a person are hard to track, identify and measure accurately. A person may work very hard superficially, but gain nothing intellectually.
Mugging up a bunch of textbooks, or learning how to play the piano is not hard work according to me.
The garage band musician may penetrate infinitely deeper into the mysteries of life than the member of Congress. Then the garage band musician may remain in oblivion throughout his life, and the Member of Congree may write a hundred books on every conceivable subject. Who is more successful?
Van Gogh sold 2 of his works during his lifetime. Madonna sold 200 million of hers. Who is more successful?
Also, we can never reach our full potential, no matter how hard we work. It is always a fraction of our potential that we use up. I’d gladly place any person who has reached his/her highest potential, above all the rest of the people who haven’t. But such a person does not exist, and has not existed.
“Van Gogh sold 2 of his works during his lifetime. Madonna sold 200 million of hers. Who is more successful?”
That depends on your definition of “SUCCESS”.
Madonna is a talentless non-singer by her own admission….. packaged and sold like Microsoft Windows to anyone willing and stupid enough to buy that garbage.
Britney, Paris, Madonna are all worthless attention whore commodities.. WHORES who banged DJs to play their music… flashed their polluted paparazzi pussies in public…. and fucked men on camera and then pretended they were NOT whores.
COMPARED TO VAN GOGH THEY ARE PROOF THAT ALL WOMEN ARE WHORES. THE SHINING EXAMPLE FOR EVERY WOMAN TO FOLLOW.
They are the Macdonald’s hamburger of the entertainment world. You know exactly what it’s going to taste like – BEFORE you buy it.
CRAP.
VAN GOGH painted. And he will live on forever without having to compromise his integrity or dignity… or even trying…. and he even got to be an artist.
Madonna, Paris and Britney are still HOPING TO be artists. And they will NEVER Accomplish it -because they are common whores more content with however many people will grovel at their feet for absolutely NOTHING.
Menarebetterthanwomen.
Excellent point, RB. I totally understand where you’re coming from.
Chris, exactly. Women only desire the results of their achievements. That is why they never achieve anything conspicuous. Men desire the achievements themselves.
Abigail, glad you understand.
@RB – Actually Abigail does NOT understand. Because she’s a whoomin, and because she believes Madonna was “more successful” than Van Gogh. When nothing could be farther than the truth.
Nor could her OWN BEHAVIOR be any further away from the very meaning of the name she bears. “Madonna” is supposed to be a RESPECTFUL address meaning “my lady”.
But Madonna is no “lady” and she is no goddam “artist” either.
She’s trash.
Always has been.
Always will be.
Remember “Borderline”?
She LOOKED like she SMELLED bad.
“My lady”??????
Please.
Menarebetterthanwomen.
Abigail MAY understand eventually.
@RB – Actually Abigail does NOT understand. Because she’s a whoomin, and because she believes Madonna was “more successfulâ€? than Van Gogh. When nothing could be farther than the truth.
I suspect that that’s what she understood previously, and probably even now. If she has thought about what I said, then she is bound to have understood. She has the logical capability to do so.
On Madonna – my view of the female gender degraded by a considerable degree after I saw ‘Material Girl’ and the following it commanded. A song about a gold-digging whore – being worshipped by millions of women. Fuck. That. Shit.
Only in America do women EXPECT to be called “Madonna” and “ladies” with any amount of “respect” –>>> while being badly behaved, gum chewing, rolling around on the floor with their belly buttons pussies hanging out, looking like they smell bad, flashing their pussies on the internet and in public ….. WHORES.
“Madonna” set one of the TOP WORST examples of what a “lady” or “attractive woman” is in the last 30 years.
Perhaps in all of human history.
abigail, i just read that whole conversation and you put foward a bloody good argument, better then i could. BUT, also better then most any other women could, which shows you as an individual are better, not women in general.
Schlaer, I could not agree more, Abigail’s comment was well thought, fairly thorough, and respectful. It was fairly evenly matched, too, by RB, however I believe his argument to be slightly more biased on the side of men. I also do not agree with the idea that all men have a streak of transcendence in them, whereas no women do. Or that women can’t reach full genius capability.
First of all, to follow how you describe transcendence, the ability to look inside the “soul”, think of shamans. I do not mean men and women who claim to be shamans because they have done studies, but those who are chosen, those who give up their lives simply to help others and look inside themselves. Some of these are women, just as some are men. Women who have uncanny knowledge of the world, who seem, for lack of another word, magical. These women are selfless.
Genius is a word up for debate. It can be, yes, IQ, or can be classified as an extraordinary talent in a field of creativity or such. I know various women, personally, who have been expertly tested and classified as geniuses, some due to I.Q. level, some due to their thought process, levels of compassion, creativity in art, writing, etc. Some women who have all these things. Some of these women, in fact, were forced to be tested, and found to be geniuses, when they did not want to be, did not want a “title”.
In Buddhism, women have been said to reach enlightenment. Women today still practice mediation, peace, and selflessness.
Some people may be born with that which they can use to possibly gain superiority. That is just how it works. However, some men may not, and definitely some women are born this way. It is impossible to prove superiority in a general sex. It is just ignorant to claim men are better than women, or the other way around.
Genetics, up bringing, education, internal strength, will power, location, everything we meet in our lives and are born with contribute to human growth. You don’t look at a female child and say, “That child will grow up to be a whore” or some such language. She might grow up to be the next top doctor in neurophysiology. Or she may just be a wonderful, quiet woman, an artist.
If we are to judge, judge when you meet a person. Interact with them. Judge them, not the gender. People can change, for better or worse. There are female and male geniuses alike. Sadly, there aren’t enough of either. But maybe that can change.
”If we are to judge, judge when you meet a person.”
Shame women couldn’t all those decades ago untill and including present day. Again you’re pointing out the faults of generalization. It still doesn’t detract from the FACT that women now profit from law given privilege. Another example, I now believe the prize money for Wimbledon for men and women is now equal. Which if you look at the games and sets played for the male to win the prize you’ll find he has actually played/worked more to achieve the same prize as his female counterpart. Why not just get rid of the gender devide in competition and let them play each other? We all know why that’ll never happen. Female athletes would moan their heads off if it were to happen because they would cease to earn.
Harry, mentally there is no way to prove all men are better than all women. Physically, however, men do simply have the body type allowing them to put on muscle faster, and in greater quantities. There are great women athletes. Now it is true that basically, none of these women could match the male athletes, as in Wimbledon, however if you consider their physiological makeup, then you can know why it is as fair to let them earn the same amount in Wimbledon. The woman who wins will have worked just as hard as the man.
Count the sets and games played Ondine, or are you intimating female games are more physically and mentally intense? The true test would be to have them play each other and not some farcical game like that one that Billy gene king played (if I have her name correct). Mentally is obviously another measure altogether. You have to remember (accepting what you’ve said of yourself as true). You are far from the average female, if nothing else, the very fact you can hold a conversation putting forward real opinions and not resorting to ‘your a fag’ comments.
To the question are men better than women? In a lot of ways I’d have to say yes. To the question are women better than men in some ways? I’d have to say, used to be. The fact women turned life into a competition between themselves and men intimates to me that women felt that there was something to prove. In many ways women feel inferior to men. Is this the product of men or women themselves? Inability to laugh at yourselves, high heels, driving 4×4’s when they only use them to take children to schools, the very fact they feel the need to compete, all indications women feel inferior. You yourself said something like women can never win, why bother trying? Again accepting what you’ve said of yourself as true, you have nothing to prove to anyone, be comfortable with yourself and at the end of the day if someone has a problem with you. ‘Fuck ‘em’, thier problem. I have to say, for someone that says she isn’t a feminist, you sound like one at times.
Okay. I respect that. And I agree. And I basically totally believe everything you say to be true. I’m not a feminist. To be honest, I haven’t slept in ten days, and I admit that I am not thinking well. I also admit that at many times I make mistakes, and I frequently laugh at myself. But true, I am not at all what one would classify as typical. I have been told that by many many people. I am not a feminist. Maybe I sound like one sometimes. I stand up less for women, and more for just the few women I know who I choose to be around (because they are so unlike other women I know)
I actually feel like I am sounding kind of pointless right now. Sorry about that.
Point is, I agree. I like discussions, because sometimes I learn from them, because they are a good way for me to interact with other people, which is something I suck at, and because I meet people with brains. Another reason I have always hung out with men. I can’t believe how few women don’t like cars, or know a damn thing about their makeup. Makeup of cars, I mean.
I am so totally going to stop talking now. I’m actually annoying myself. But thanks Harry, for having a brain, and putting things in a way that I can accept. You seem like a fairly amazing man, from what I can see so far.
You come across as a thinker Ondine, at my age I respect that more than anything these days. I also generally show people respect (both genders) untill they prove to me I have no need to. I have nothing against equality in principal but realise it’s more a philosophy than a reality. what most women today call equality is anything but, that’s my beef and will likely always be so untill it changes. Can I suggest you get some sleep, hopefully that’s not chemical related. Had some experience with speed myself, not a good idea. Best wishes from my end, again hopefully you manage some sleep, ten days without sleep isn’t good for the mind. You’ll likely start to see the ceiling breath or some other wierd shit, lol, be lucky.
Thanks for the compliment btw
What is the best sound in the world?
Hearing manhole’s hips crack under pressure!
How do you get 100 manholes into a phone booth?
Kama Sutra
How do you get them out?
Jaws of life!
DRINKING BEER AND HEAVY METAL ARE FUCKING AMAZING!!! BARBECUE AND BIG TITS ALSO BY THE WAY
Actually the car was a Lincoln Continental Mark IV. The Mark series Lincolns all had a vestigial hump as a remnant of the old continental look. The sweet thing about Kenny’s Lincoln was that the rocket motor ran through the body and exhausted in the back where the hump was cut out.
The car almost looked like it was supposed to have a rocket motor in it. Only *the* manliest man ever would modify a 3 ton car (no shit I had one and weighed it) with a gazillion horsepower rocket motor and then strap himself in 3 inches away from the thing and launch himself over a canyon. Now that’s fuckin manly.
PS: Are there any man points for driving the only car make on the planet with a vestigial hump?
Damn Dick, you were kicking all kinds of ass on this post. Nicely done.
Wow he did the speed of sound while free falling.
Broke 3 world records that still stand.
It’s incredible what man has achieved.
I know I’ve posted this somewhere in the forums but even in my mid forties learning about the exploits of Joseph Kittinger made me feel like a teenage boy finding his boyhood hero.
Record breaking jump
All three of his jumps are shown at 76′000ft, 74′700ft and finally 102′800ft.
A mans man doing his thing, and not a bitch in sight.
Quite.
lol
im with u all the way babes
Manly men are sexy not scary.
You ever seen ” I love NEW YORK”
Rico is sexy. whooooo…yea……come here spanish suga
I’d want to have my insurance paid up before tea-bagging Mandy J, too.
-Big Al
Aaron you couldn’t afford it nor would you survive it.
lol
Female
With every post you make, you prove the premise.
inter os atque offam multa intervenire posse.
Aaron you couldn’t afford it nor would you survive it.