Ask Dick: Why is Prostitution Illegal?
The following question was sent to me by a reader Erik.
Here in America prostitution is illegal, yet pornography is completely okay so long as all participants are eighteen and over. This is what confuses me: Is pornography (that is to say, intercourse between two parties) not the same as prostitution?
Why is prostitution illegal?
Good question, Erik. Now prepare your mind for a mantomic explosion of answer.
Prostitution is illegal because women hate the fuck out of each other.
Men love women. I’m a man and I love women so much I would have sex with all of them if I could. Even the fat ones.
Fat women are like dessert trolleys. They’re stuffed with desserts and they’re no good in the sack.
Let’s look at the facts.
Men give women free cars and free money so women can drive to the mall and blow that free money on useless bullshit. That’s nice of us. Men also built strip clubs and Hooters so women can easily put themselves through medical school. Again, quite nice of us. Do you know how much money strippers make every night for doing almost nothing? Like two grand. That’s just more good old benevolent men footing the tab at the foot of the stage. Men are like fire hoses of altruism. It doesn’t matter if you’ve got the window closed, we’re busting it the fuck down with generosity. Clean yourself up.
That’s where prostitution comes in. Men invented prostitution so no woman anywhere would ever have a single problem in her life.
Unless you call too much sex a problem!
Women’s magazines, women’s financial manuals (which include such gems as: be more confident when asking for a raise. While you’re at it, grow a penis, honey jugs. That’s about as likely as a woman growing a backbone), and women’s fitness classes, are all full of lady-problems solved very easily by man’s first invention: prostitution.
Prostitution is the only way in the world you can get free money. You don’t even have to stand in line like you do for welfare. Prostitution comes to you.
Have a bite of this logical Manwich.
All women use prostitution to get free sushi without batting an eye. Sushi is fucking expensive. Ergo, women use prostitution to get free money. Or is every woman at a sushi bar somehow not a prostitute?
The reason prostitution is illegal is women hate seeing other women having it easy. Remember how many women called Anna Nichole Smith a whore when she married that old rich guy? Look at how many women hate Heather Mills. Yes, Heather Mills is a cunt, but women don’t know that. They just hate Heather Mills because she has it easy.
Women are nature’s spanner. Once you’ve got some shit together and some man cogs lined up cranking out the good times, in is chucked a woman and mucked go your gears. That’s what women did with prostitution.
I think that’s what the Bible means allegorically speaking when it says Eve ruined the Garden of Eden. Prostitution was busy solving all the problems of womankind while men solved their own, but women had to go and wreck it with a fucking fascist crusade. I don’t know what the apple means as a metaphor though. Maybe it just represents something shiny. Women will do anything for shiny.
If you really want the whole scoop here, I can only recommend the following. Pay the next woman you’re going to have sex with 20 bucks before you do. And make sure she knows what it’s for.
You’ll thank me for it.
Related Articles:
December 12th, 2007 at 8:33 pm - IP Man-Hash: 60c984a618a05
You’re always shocked and appalled. What a sheltered little girly-girl, considers this the worst thing she’s ever heard. What about this?
Oop, our little girly in all of her infinite femme wisdom overlooked what was staring her in the face. Keep in mind that by not running to your aid he would just be preserving his own health and piece of mind, as well as assuring that a few less men would be placed into jail by ‘accident’ when a slut confuses ‘drunken sex’ with rape.
And really, we all know that 90% of young western women really deserve it. I sure as hell wouldn’t stop that little tease from getting what she was asking for - perhaps she’d learn from this little life experience.
December 13th, 2007 at 12:44 am - IP Man-Hash: 8e86de744d7eb
Oh and you are the great judge of hades?
No man here would rape your stinky hole, just calm down and then fuckoff this site forever. Reading comprehension problems?
The post you are referring to was about not helping you dumb bitches if someone was to rape you. Because you western women aren’t worth the time of day. The men here don’t rape and most of us just don’t care what happens to you dumb bitches.
Ba Bah
February 13th, 2008 at 5:39 am - IP Man-Hash: 2e156e431b91f
I have never known anyone being able to rationalise such a topic.
February 23rd, 2008 at 12:43 pm - IP Man-Hash: 567ed26869a06
Of course there is a tremendous difference, for a woman, between rape and consentual, blissful sex. It’s the difference of willingly paying for something that you want, and being robbed.
The woman is, in the blissful sexual experience, using her sexual charms to “purchase” the affections–and maybe the wallet–of the man in question. She has chosen this man, deciding that he is worthy–in terms of his social status, his monetary ability, his physical appearance (which matters though it does not stand alone as a woman’s may for a man) and his demeanor (how he makes her “feel”)–and through those traits she is judging, from biological perspective, whether or not she is willing to potentially have his baby.
A stranger who jumps in without satisfying any of the requirements is potentially, from a biological or evolutionary standpoint, saddling this woman with a child carrying his unworthy genes. He’s sowing the seeds without buying or even renting the field. Someone else tilled the land. He is not a capitalist, who works for a living, he’s the exact opposite–a thief!
To this effect, the difference between the two is huge. A woman who has consensual sex has already done the “math” in her head. Depending on her actual or perceived self worth, this man is worth the cost, and she may be free to enjoy the experience, which is leading her somewhere she wants to go. Whether she’s a girlfriend of a worthy man, or a prostitute for a man who has the required fee, she’s getting what she believes she is worth for ths experience–and if she isn’t, she won’t be happy and will ultimately change her behavior if she is to improve herself. But either way she makes the choice, bad or good.
Rape is the exact opposite. Since a woman’s brain is so focused on not getting stuck with just anybody’s kids, she cannot possibly feel anything but totally violated when she not only has no choice, but doesn’t even know the person. These could be anybody’s genes she will now have to raise! And if he couldn’t find a willing woman, it’s more than likely the genes aren’t too great.
Men think differently because a sexual encounter, in the natural state of being, does not result in his having to raise crummy kids. He doesn’t have to spend nine months gestating and then years raising the kid–unless he chooses to (or in the modern world, is forced to by law, convention, morality, etc–which are irrelevant when we are speaking, as we are, from a biological perspective). So he doesn’t naturally worry all the particularly much about the consequence of an ill-conceived interaction, and even being “raped” by a woman, if such a thing could happen, would not have the same magnitude of psychological consequence for him.
A lot of people on here seem to be able to use logic extremely well up to the point when it doesn’t support what they want to do, and then they abandon it. If you are trying to think from a biological, or evolutionary point of view, then you can’t keep considering sex as an end in itself when taking this approach. While in the modern world, science has allowed us to eliminate many consequences so that it can be treated as such, the fact remains that this urge to have sexual intercourse exists for a biological reason, and a lot of the psychology surrounding it has more to do with those animal instincts and procreation than it does with your personally getting your rocks off.
Moral: the desire of a woman not to be raped is sensible. The fact of it being the same ACTION as consensual sex is irrelevant–as is the fact of saying I like eating steak, why shouldn’t I close my eyes and let a potentially malevolent stranger feed me WHATEVER, because it’s all eating. Yes, but you don’t know if this person is going to be feeding you shards of glass, wet concrete, or acetone–and unlike with food, with sex you won’t necessarily know the difference until years down the road!
February 23rd, 2008 at 1:15 pm - IP Man-Hash: d9d1e6bb655f0
Of course there is a tremendous difference, FOR A WOMAN, between rape and consentual, blissful sex. It’s the difference of willingly paying for something that you want, and being robbed.
Dude, you lost me at that. By considering only for women that there’s a difference you’re no better then the lying rape victims.
February 23rd, 2008 at 2:29 pm - IP Man-Hash: d9d1e6bb655f0
Of course there is a tremendous difference, for a woman, between rape and consentual, blissful sex. It’s the difference of willingly paying for something that you want, and being robbed.
See above.
The woman is, in the blissful sexual experience, using her sexual charms to “purchase” the affections–and maybe the wallet–of the man in question. She has chosen this man, deciding that he is worthy–in terms of his social status, his monetary ability, his physical appearance (which matters though it does not stand alone as a woman’s may for a man) and his demeanor (how he makes her “feel”)–and through those traits she is judging, from biological perspective, whether or not she is willing to potentially have his baby.
For one, remove maybe. Two, women have a shitty sense of worth, only thinking of two of those “worthy attributes” at once. Let’s take the teenage single mothers for example. When they “allowed” their men to have sex with them(which is silly because last time I checked sex was a equal partnership)
, did those girls take the time to see if their boyfriends were capable of supporting them or the child that will be created sooner or later? Did they take the time to see if they were able to handle the relationship with sex involved? Of course not. They believe that their love is more important then what anyone thinks(or if they can handle the responsibilities and consequences of sex ) and proceed to have sex anyway.
“in terms of his social status, his monetary ability, ” And then you have the other side of women, who will marry a man not because they love him or they like the way he looks, but for his wallet pure and simple. And the minute the man runs out of money and social worth, the woman will leave him (with child) and live off of alimony and child support until they find the next poor sap to feed off of like a parasite.
–and through those traits she is judging, from biological perspective, whether or not she is willing to potentially have his baby.
And let it be known that women of the present think not at all about a baby until they have to deal with one. If so you would not have women going with the men who do not or care not care with children. Women are selfish that way.
A stranger who jumps in without satisfying any of the requirements is potentially, from a biological or evolutionary standpoint, saddling this woman with a child carrying his unworthy genes. He’s sowing the seeds without buying or even renting the field. Someone else tilled the land. He is not a capitalist, who works for a living, he’s the exact opposite–a thief!
Problem A: Half of the time the man isn’t completely to blame. There are thousands of cases of men being tricked by women into having sex with them AND being forced into taking care of another man’s child because the woman will not admit they cheated on another man.
Problem B:Saddling? Considering a child as a burden only shows the inherent selfishness of the woman. While they are hard to work with and raise properly, a child is a joy to take care of. And that’s IF they get pregnant in the first place. That paragraph assumes that each and every rape leads to pregnancy, giving undue negative attributes towards children who’ve had nothing to do with their creation.
Problem C: Again you’re assuming all rapists are men. What of the men forced to take care of children because the women caught them half-awake or drunk and had their way with them? Where is your disdain and disgust for those women neh?
To this effect, the difference between the two is huge. A woman who has consensual sex has already done the “math” in her head. Depending on her actual or perceived self worth, this man is worth the cost, and she may be free to enjoy the experience, which is leading her somewhere she wants to go. Whether she’s a girlfriend of a worthy man, or a prostitute for a man who has the required fee, she’s getting what she believes she is worth for ths experience–and if she isn’t, she won’t be happy and will ultimately change her behavior if she is to improve herself. But either way she makes the choice, bad or good.
I’ll let someone else answer you there.
Rape is the exact opposite. Since a woman’s brain is so focused on not getting stuck with just anybody’s kids, she cannot possibly feel anything but totally violated when she not only has no choice, but doesn’t even know the person. These could be anybody’s genes she will now have to raise! And if he couldn’t find a willing woman, it’s more than likely the genes aren’t too great.
Again, assuming all rapists are men. AND the worth thing is quite annoying and infantile, showing a prejudice against poor people. Rich people aren’t capable of rape?
Men think differently because a sexual encounter in the natural state of being, does not result in his having to raise crummy kids.
As a man let me tell you, not only is that sexist that is also untrue. We have plenty of men paying child support for 18 years, let alone the men who can’t get to their kids because of false abuse charges. Many children are not only forced to grow up without a father, but are told by the mother that daddy doesn’t care for them. By assuming that herd mentality you are celebrating the act of depriving fathers of their kids.
He doesn’t have to spend nine months gestating: No he just has to pay for the child for 18 years, even if he doesn’t get to see said child. And..
and then years raising the kid–unless he chooses to (or in the modern world,is forced to by law, convention, morality, etc–which are irrelevant when we are speaking, as we are, from a biological perspective).
Okay, OR? Many men would GLADLY take care of their child unless they find out the child is not theirs and the woman is just trying to latch unto the nearest host body. Hell, many men take care of the child EVEN AFTER finding out otherwise. and Morality is not being “forced” by any means, it is simply doing what you believe to be right. Force by morality is a oxymoron.
So he doesn’t naturally worry all the particularly much about the consequence of an ill-conceived interaction: Bullshit. I know I am not currently capable of caring for a child therefore I’ve decided not to have sex at all. Your arguement is incompetent.
, and even being “raped” by a woman, if such a thing could happen: You’ve just insulted the victims of countless female pedophiles, vicious female rapists, and have fed into the herd mentality that men are nothing more then beasts. Shame on you.
would not have the same magnitude of psychological consequence for him. See above. Bullshit.
A lot of people on here seem to be able to use logic extremely well up to the point when it doesn’t support what they want to do, and then they abandon it.
You have shown that you are not capable of using logic to its full capabilities.
In fact you have shown yourself to be a hypocrite and a fool, only pursuing logic when it suits you.
If you are trying to think from a biological, or evolutionary point of view, then you can’t keep considering sex as an end in itself when taking this approach.
That’s circular logic. You need not look at something from a point of view but only search into the subject itself. Point of views are nothing but evolved bias.
While in the modern world, science has allowed us to eliminate many consequences so that it can be treated as such, the fact remains that this urge to have sexual intercourse exists for a biological reason, and a lot of the psychology surrounding it has more to do with those animal instincts and procreation than it does with your “personally getting your rocks off.”
While that true, that is also common sense tipped with another shaming remark, seeing how getting your rocks off is usually attributed towards men.
Moral: the desire “of a woman” not to be raped is sensible.
More common sense tipped with bias proving that you’re not someone who should be speaking of “morality”
The fact of it being the same ACTION as consensual sex is irrelevant: Duh.
–as is the fact of saying I like eating steak, why shouldn’t I close my eyes and let a potentially malevolent stranger feed me WHATEVER, because it’s all eating.
Now we have common sense tipped with a overly worded put down aimed at your audience by assuming that because we do not have the ability to see rape as what it is, you must relate it to something as simple as eating to get the point across
Yes, but you don’t know if this person is going to be feeding you shards of glass, wet concrete, or acetone
More common sense tinged with bias
–and unlike with food, with sex you won’t necessarily know the difference until years down the road!
Oh there are so many things wrong with that. Logically, if a baby takes six months to be born, that is not a year. AND it’s ignoring the very psychology of sex and rape, which causes instantaneous results good or bad.
With your attempt to lecture others you have only proved yourself to be biased and shortsighted in your opinion, focused more on being superior and
educating people lower then you then actually using logic and morality to what it should be used for. Be gone and try researching what you think before lecturing.
March 3rd, 2008 at 2:07 pm - IP Man-Hash: c81b010f4525b
And there arbalest goes again. If you do not explicitly mention poor “victimes of female pedophiles or rapists” in your post and degrade women, then you are completely wrong in his book. Really, he must have been raped or abused in his youth by women, and now nourishes great hatred towards them. You’re an interesting psychological case.
For once someone said something interesting. Zoolig’s post was very true, although those are not the only reasons rape is seen as such a traumatic thing by women. I would imagine victimes of rape would feel soiled and cheated out of their dignity and humanity. There are other reasons, but overall, you summed it up very well.
But of course, some idiot has to come and ruin everything.
March 3rd, 2008 at 2:28 pm - IP Man-Hash: 74d25c292c6b8
Yes, you just had to come by didn’t you? Besides, you’re projecting again. You still haven’t learned better have you?
March 3rd, 2008 at 2:53 pm - IP Man-Hash: 68d4f94bfae30
And you would know, because you hold multiple PhD’s in that area, don’t you? What… you don’t?
Are you looking in the mirror while you post?
March 3rd, 2008 at 5:03 pm - IP Man-Hash: 902ea58d0aea2
So - is Rape a daring and revolutionary act? Like a new art movement or scientific discovery? Is rape the pinnacle of MANliness? It would seem to be.
April 5th, 2008 at 9:45 pm - IP Man-Hash: e851e02b605ba
I seriously doubt that any of you guys would be singing the same tune if it were your daughter, sister, mother or wife who was a prostitute. Think about it…if you were the bastard child of a prostitute, would you feel the same way? If your daughter was getting paid to blow strangers, how would you feel about that? Look at it from that standpoint.
April 23rd, 2008 at 9:02 am - IP Man-Hash: 7df871ec47ee7
“I think that’s what the Bible means allegorically speaking when it says Eve ruined the Garden of Eden.”
Didn’t the bible talk about how the WHORE OF BABYLON was a sign of the end times? Isn’t the fact that america is founded on a christian belief system (puritanism and Calvinsim) the reason that prostitution is illegal?
You Fail to asses your facts, and the historical origins of the laws you write about. Therefore, you question it’s illegality on what you percieve, not what the lawmakers percieve
April 23rd, 2008 at 7:52 pm - IP Man-Hash: 6ada2a355b6ab
Prostitution is illegal because the government wants to protect it’s monopoly on screwing people.
April 23rd, 2008 at 10:28 pm - IP Man-Hash: 3b0b85e9c89d9
No. It is not our fault they chose to do it. They could have gotten a real job instead.
April 28th, 2008 at 10:18 pm - IP Man-Hash: f635884619a48
Aren’t you contradicting yourself here? If women hate sex, how is prostitution easy money? Aren’t they getting paid for something they hate doing?
April 28th, 2008 at 10:20 pm - IP Man-Hash: f635884619a48
…But a lot more people would be dying of AIDS and Hepatitis. If prostitution were legal mostly all guys including myself would go through with it contract a disease and spread it to the normal girls they fuck, who will spread it to the next guy. The US would turn into another Africa
April 28th, 2008 at 10:47 pm - IP Man-Hash: 4b8494f25ae28
There once was a pauper named Dave
Who stole from a prostitute’s grave
She was missing a tit
And had worms in her clit
But think of the money he saved.
May 12th, 2008 at 8:31 pm - IP Man-Hash: 2bc5844a0f6c6
maybe to stop the spreading of STDs(if you know what that means)
June 10th, 2008 at 12:21 am - IP Man-Hash: 8a37b6454e781
No shit!
June 10th, 2008 at 1:56 am - IP Man-Hash: e609ee1fbc305
And that’s why you suck cock for a living, sweet-tits.
Maybe to stop the spread of STDs. How naive and ignorant of that fuckhole to say such a thing. But then, she’s built for fucking, not thinking.
Let me explain:
If the government regulates prostitution, what happens to manholes like you with bulbous canker sores the size of blueberries on your fuckholes? Oh, right, you don’t get a license.
The fuckhole says: But wait, I’ll still have that job as a slutty secretary, right?
That’s irrelevant, but no, you will not. Rather, an ample supply of fuckholes just like you who are clean, tested, and will go down on a client on the off-chance he makes a deal will be available. And they’ll accept minimum wage for unskilled labor, because any red-blooded man knows that you fuckholes are paid in attention, not money.
The money? You just blow that off on weed or blow like the cock-holster you are. Or maybe you eat something and then throw it back up, you stupid whore.
Anyhow, as you can see, with cockholes like you around who think you can be a duelie - built for fucking and thinking - you can see why literature like this has to exist. We can’t have you going around unquestioned, now, can we?