Why women hate sex.
Out of all the problems that have ever or will ever exist on the Earth, there is only one that men haven’t and will never be able to solve — not because they can’t, because that’s ridiculous, but because the problem is unsolvable by design. Women hate sex.
That’s it, there you have it. The end-all, be-all of cluster fucks. But why?
Do women hate sex — and they do — because of some kind of woman-guilt from an outdated puritan societal dogma? Or perhaps a stigma of guilt or a fear of abandonment? No. None of these things are it. Women hate sex simply because they are lousy at it.
This can be proved in a quick stroll down the checkout aisle at your local market of groceries — a place thick to the rafters with women. Take a look at some of their magazines and you will no doubt see a running theme: ‘Ten Ways to not suck in bed’, ‘Six Things to do to Your Man that aren’t Lay There Like a Futon’, and ‘Honestly who gives half a fuck about socks being on or off? Jesus Christ that’s pathetic’.
Also, much in the same way that a wall probably doesn’t like or doesn’t care about playing tennis with you, it’s definitely not your fault. Don’t let your sympathetic male compassion get the better of you. You could be dancing around like a maniac and pulling stunts out of your figurative ass like Johnny Magic the Wicked Awesome — maybe some whirl-arounds and in your face spikes from across the court — it’s really up to you as the man — but no matter what, the wall will remain unfazed. It just sits there doing nothing like a lump on a log probably thinking that it wants a new expensive coat of paint.
This same theory can be applied to many other things as well. For example: that women hate problems.
In Chinese, the symbol for crisis is the same as opportunity. I haven’t looked that up, but I heard it from a man so it’s probably true because us men have something called integrity. This means that in a time of crisis, we men are at our show stopping best. Take a flat tire on a moonless night for instance. While a man is out changing nuts and bolts and doing all manner of screwing on the side of the road, will a woman so much as think to grab a flashlight and help? No.
That’s because women hate holding flashlights, because they are complete rubbish at it. Force a woman to hold a flashlight when it matters and you’re likely to catch her aiming it into the sky for absolutely no goddamn reason. You’re better off just duct taping it to a mailbox and catapulting it into space.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 278 … 19 18 17 16 15 [14] 13 12 11 10 9 … 1 » Show All
i think this website is a load of bullshit!
The thing that men tend to forget in this whole argument is the biological reason why it’s a bad idea to send women to war. It’s the same reason that the order, “Women and children first!” makes sense when conducting an evacuation:
Suppose you have a war that goes badly. Badly as in worse than the Russians in WWII or the Germans by the end of the same war, when 12-year-olds were sent to combat.
If you send nothing but men and you lose the war, you can still repopulate your society. There is, after all, a one-to-one relationship between mother and baby at any given time. If half or more of your post-pubescent males are killed but your females are safe, you can repopulate at a reasonable rate. If half of all your breeding population is killed, you can repopulate at a much lower rate.
One man can produce ten babies simultaneously if there are ten women available to carry them. The reverse is not true.
Bottom line: you don’t send your baby-carriers to war. They’re too important to the race to endanger.
Dakota Smith
Good point Devek, A million man points to you. As any man you would of course ignore your own wounds to help out the team.
One point, gentlemen. Remember the attitudes of the men from that era. Men of that day respected and loved the respectful and loving women of that era. Such are the sentiments of some on this site, like Wolfe and myself. We may have our problems with women of today, but I still hold them dear. But I digress… The point is, the first thing that comes to my mind is, why would I want I woman to see the horrors and atrocities of war. Being in the Navy, I had an opportunity… misfortune would be more appropriate, to witness one of the most horrifying things in life. We had a shoring line snap while mooring the sub. The snap-back cut the man in half at the navel. With his inards spilling out on the deck, gasping in desperation and looking to us frantically to help him. Of course, there was nothing we could do. We had to kneel there beside him, try to comfort him, and wait for him to die. The Corpsman couldn’t even get to the deck quick enough to give him painkillers. And that was not even a combat situation. Why would any woman want to see that? Why would any man want to have a woman see that?
Brilliant points, Devek. You’ve clearly won.
-Dick
I might have a wounded arm, but I would pick your ass up and carry you anyway.
Matt,
Let us say, for arguments sake, that you, Devek and I are in the midst of a battle and we have to pull back to allied lines. You have a leg wound but are capable, with assistance, to make it back, Devek is wounded in the arm and cannot use it but is otherwise okay. I am badly wounded and unconscious, now there would be a fourth man but because we allowed women in to the army our fourth person, the only person available to carry me back to safety is a 5’6�, 110lb woman. Do you think she could carry the average man of say, 6’, 195lbs plus her combat gear back to relative safety during combat? How combat effective would she be during PMS?? “Sorry sir I can’t go fight today I am bloated and cramping.� The point is there are and were reasons for that Matt. It was not decided just because they are women.
Women did help. Who worked the factories and raised the kids while the men were away? Men do a better job at raising kids and working in factories, but we were kind of busy saving the world. Furthermore, women in that day and age sacrificed a lot to keep things going smoothly and most of them didn’t complain. There is a huge difference between women in that era and women today.
If WWII happened today, the feminist would of thrown an outright fit. “How DARE we sacrifice and work harder so the men can go out and have fun fighting a war in Europe. I’m going to sit at home and watch Ophra all day long.” We would be reading this website in German.
“If we sent the women out to fight WWII, this website would be written in German.”
Devek, very well said sir, well said indeed.
O…k but That doesn’t answer my question, You say you had a reason for not sending them out its just I’ve heard other guys say that women didn’t help at all and that they should’ve done as much work as the men did, but they wouldn’t have let them anyway..
If we sent the women out to fight WWII, this website would be written in German.
I dont think anyone here said that yet, but I’m just asking in general.
Alot of men go around saying that they are better since they were in wars and stuff, and I respect that, but some of them are forgetting that back in the day men wouldn’t let women join the war, so why put them down for something you did to them?
Thanks Alan, I believe i was given a similar speach from my Father. He was in Special Forces during Nam. That is why Fathers are important and men are better than women, we hold to those things.
Reminds me of the joke from Chasing Amy:
Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, a male-friendly lesbian, and a man-hating dyke are all approaching an intersection from opposite directions. Which one will reach the intersection first?
Answer: the man-hating dyke.
Why? Because the other three are all figments of your fucking imagination.
Dakota Smith
Standing ovation for Oldone.
That was reminiscent of a speech my Chief gave me once. Those three words, along with courage and commitment, used in that context, kinda gets me misty-eyed. Ah, better days when I was surrounded by people who held those values to be first and foremost.
Me Said: “People like you are the reason i’m a lesbian.”
By that you must mean intelligent people who hold valor, honor and integrity as being paramount and are unwilling to placate you at your every whim.
Funny thing about lesbians.
Vast majority of them are men-hating feminists. Are gay guys women-haters? Nope. Gay guys are the only ones that can actually stand women (to an extent, there’s a ton of exceptions.)
Let that one stew for a while.
We are very glad that you are.
Why has there never been a lesbian who was “in the closet”?
-Dick