Woman Astronaut Kills Everyone

NASA finally put a woman in charge of a spacewalk and guess what happened. Fuck ups happened. That’s what always happens when you combine women and space. Remember the Challenger explosion? That probably happened because there was a woman aboard.

Earlier today, while doing routine maintenance on a solar panel, dozy astro-broad Heidemarie Stefanyshyn-Piper let a crucial bag of tools float off into space. I highly recommend you watch the video (at the bottom of this article) because reading about a woman screwing up is never as satisfying as watching it happen.

The dead silence you hear as Heidemarie stupidly watches her tools float away is a thousand men at Mission Control simultaneously not saying the same thing.

“Are you fucking kidding me?”

Being about the size of a shitty television set, NASA reports the crucial bag of tools as the biggest thing ever to be lost in space. Contrariwise, Heidemarie describes the event as a “little hiccup”.

“Despite my little hiccup…I think we did a good job out there,” -Heidemarie Stefanyshyn-Piper

Yea right. And Adrian Brody’s nose is a “little crooked”. World War 2 was a “tiny misunderstanding”. San Francisco has “some gay people”. Women are as familiar with accountability as my ass is with a six-toed Snoggle.

What the fuck is a six-toed Snoggle?

Exactly.

This was not a “little hiccup”, it was a massive fuck up. Getting spare sets of million dollar wrenches into space is as high on NASA’s To-Do list as making sure their astronauts aren’t afraid of the dark. They’re astronauts. They can’t afford to be afraid of the dark — or to let mission critical tools fly off into fucking space!

Unless NASA won the lottery recently and has tons of money to piss around, I suggest they remember Dick Masterson’s Rule #1 for Women in the Workforce.

A penny saved is a woman fired.

It doesn’t matter if she’s greasing your space station solar panel or your weasel, just because you want to stick your body parts in her, doesn’t mean she can do shit when you’re not around. Women operate on something called the Zen of Labor. If a woman is working, and there’s no man around to make sure she’s doing it right, is she really working?

No. She’s fucking around and looking at shit to buy online or instant messaging friends. That’s all women do at work all day. Or she’s reading about celebrities online. That’s another thing women do all the time when you’re not looking.

Women are a waste of time. That’s all they do and that’s all they are.

Women Don’t Pay Attention

NASA is currently trying to figure out how to complete the rest of the mission without an entire tool chest. Which I guess means they’re going to fashion wrenches and grease guns out of toothpaste and feces, who the fuck knows. It’s like that scene in Apollo 13 when the nerds back home figured out how to build a circular air duct out of square ducting to compensate for a blown ventilation system. It’s kind of like that, except in this case, the problem wasn’t caused by God (mechanical faliure), it was caused by WADD.

Woman Attention Deficit Disorder

WADD costs employers billions of dollars every year. WADD is why your wife shrunk all your business pants and let your son wreck your new portable DVD player. WADD is how all these kids keep getting swiped at playgrounds.

No matter what’s at stake, women don’t pay attention. They have Woman Attention Deficit Disorder.

Spacewoman Kills Everyone

NASA doesn’t send motherfuckers into space for fun. They do it mostly to set up communications satellites and research shit that no one cares about — but one day they could save everyone from an asteroid. You never know. It could happen. Remember the movie Armageddon? There were no women in that movie aside from the one fucking Ben Affleck and the five fucking Steve Buscemi. That’s how a space mission is supposed to be.

Now imagine if Bruce Willis had accidentally let all the drills drift off into space about an hour into the movie. That is what happened today.

The point is, nothing goes into space for laughs. It goes into space because it’s absolutely necessary to be in space. So what’s a woman doing up there? While watching Heidemarie stare uselessly at her bag of tools as they floated into oblivion, I could hear exactly what she was thinking.

“Help! I need a man!”

Women shouldn’t be cops, they shouldn’t be firemen, and they especially shouldn’t be astronauts. There are too many things to go wrong in all of those professions and each tiny mistake can cost lives. Nothing happens when a woman wastes an afternoon looking for old boyfriends on Facebook, but what happens when a woman is distracted with her vagina or menopause or something while repairing a space station? It fucking crashes.

Manclusion

Men aren’t better than women because we’re more logical, smarter, or because we routinely score better on every quantifiable test ever devised by human beings. Men are better than women because women fuck up constantly. They fuck up constantly and they never admit it.

I’ll let spacewalk officer John Ray take it from here.

“What it boils down to is all it takes is one small mistake for a tether not to be hooked up quite correctly or to slip off, and that’s what happened here,” – John “Super Cock” Ray.

That six-toed Snoggle is called “Restraint”.

Video of Woman Losing Space Tools
Woman Loses Space Tools

Also, check out the continuing saga of Dick Masterson, Chauvinist Detective at the Super Frat!

Related Articles:

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

RSS feed | Trackback URI

906 Comments in 215 threads.»

Pages: [11] 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 » Show All

Comment by NASA
2009-10-26 14:11:10 - IP Man-Hash: c519daa25f04d

You guys are a bunch of motherfucking rednecks.
I don’t care about the women part- but how dare you insult NASA and space exploration. Fuck you.
Show me your degrees. Underwater basket weaving does not count.

Comment by Watcher
2009-10-26 15:26:45 - IP Man-Hash: dc2258566578b

NASA in your case stands for Not Another Stupid Asshole!

Comment by Harry
2009-10-26 15:34:02 - IP Man-Hash: 6ec063d659c2e

*laughing*

Comment by Watcher
2009-10-26 15:52:23 - IP Man-Hash: dc2258566578b

I’m both surprised and glad that Dick decided not to shut this site down, my day would not be the same without the occasional game of ‘whack-a-moron’.

I can see it now, ‘NASA’ furrowing his brow in a desperately futile attempt to turn the word WATCHER into an insulting acronym…

watch this space, it may take a while.

(Comments won't nest below this level)
Comment by Harry
2009-10-26 16:04:44 - IP Man-Hash: 6ec063d659c2e

LMAO! Sometimes I actually feel sorry for them, thankfully not often. Same btw, very glad Dick decided not to shut down, suggest we keep an eye out for any male (proved male) posts that advocate violence and suggest they leave.

 
Comment by Watcher
2009-10-26 16:08:50 - IP Man-Hash: dc2258566578b

Even if they do post (I’m looking at you Jack) what can we actually do about it? Nothing.

Dick really has to allow one or more of us to delete posts or bar users.

 
Comment by Harry
2009-10-26 16:14:47 - IP Man-Hash: 6ec063d659c2e

Probably a good idea. Anyone suggested it to Dick? You fellas that are clud up about web sites would be a good choice if he felt he could trust you. Failing that we’d have to do what I’d prefer not to and verbally attack another male on this site. I tried to drop a few hints to Jack but there was no convincing him. I even told him a couple days ago or so his posts were likely to get the site shut down.

 
Comment by Harry
2009-10-26 16:15:42 - IP Man-Hash: 6ec063d659c2e

clud= clued

 
Comment by Watcher
2009-10-26 16:21:18 - IP Man-Hash: dc2258566578b

Perhaps all we can do is to draw Dick’s attention to any poster that is over stepping the mark.

You’re right, I really don’t like attacking males on this site but the way I see it there is a world of difference between righteous anger and psychotic insanity. Actually it’s a ‘word’ of difference, self-control.

Men have it, women don’t.

 
Comment by Harry
2009-10-26 16:27:37 - IP Man-Hash: 6ec063d659c2e

Very true. One of the reasons it took me ages to even think he was a male posting. As much as anyone can tell by script on a page, Jack appears to need some help. Posting on sites like this isn’t any help to him. Agreed, I’m sure Dick will appreciate knowing someone is turning his site into a lunatic asylum.

 
Comment by Watcher
2009-10-26 16:48:08 - IP Man-Hash: dc2258566578b

Harry::

Got to go, catch yer soon buddy.

 
Comment by Harry
2009-10-26 17:00:54 - IP Man-Hash: 6ec063d659c2e

Sex in the city just started! *Changes channel so he doesn’t have to poke his own eyes out* Also gone…..

 
Comment by sidonia
2009-10-26 17:18:11 - IP Man-Hash: dfd21803c2e3b

While I dont find I will be posting here that much, may I say that I am happy for you guys that the site will not be closing down. I just came home to find this and was rather taken aback. It is good to see those who frequent and support this site clearly speak out against violence towards women.

respect guys…sidonia

Comment by Harry
2009-10-26 17:24:50 - IP Man-Hash: 6ec063d659c2e

Allways sidonia. Despite what most women that post here think. We actually want women to change for the better, not beat them into submission.

 
 
Comment by Harry
2009-10-26 17:44:21 - IP Man-Hash: 6ec063d659c2e

I’m curious, why the change of heart?

”While I dont find I will be posting here that much”

 
Comment by sidonia
2009-10-26 19:23:40 - IP Man-Hash: dfd21803c2e3b

Since I began posting here Harry; I have given this quite a bit of thought, and honestly there are several reasons…

While I wont go into them all, most imprtantly…
this site wasn’t created to “make a difference” rather it was created for Men by a Man, as a place for men to come together.

As such, while some (men) may come here in hopes of helping women to “wake tf up”… most are not here for those reasons… simply put, the negativity(on both sides) overshadows any usefulness the site may hold in working towards a middle ground.

Again i reiterate, this was not the purpose Dick had in mind when creating this site… but you cant expect to throw all these statements out there about women, espect them to grasp the underlying humor of it,
and then say, oh your not allowed to be here, and further expect them to stay away, or to approach the site with an open mind. Once you start insulting others, you lose any ground you might have held with that person.

I guess what i’m trying to say here Harry, is that it is a lost cause here…most men come here to bash women, and rightly so…and most women come here to bash the men who bash them, and rightly so… and neither side ever wins or accomplishes anything at all.

The site was created for one purpose but has simply turned into a combat zone for men and women to wage war upon one another…

just not my cup of tea…sidonia

 
Comment by sidonia
2009-10-26 19:33:29 - IP Man-Hash: dfd21803c2e3b

but you cant expect to throw all these statements out there about women, espect them to grasp the underlying humor of it, [[[[ or even the truth of it when read as it is written]]]] and then say, oh your not allowed to be here, and further expect them to stay away, or to approach the site with an open mind. Once you start insulting others, you lose any ground you might have held with that person.

 
Comment by Harry
2009-10-27 01:33:41 - IP Man-Hash: 6ec063d659c2e

Sidonia: Once again you make a valid point, sure you’re not a man? jk. I actually agree with what you’ve said to a certain extent but what you have to remember, todays man has no forum in which to air his opinions if it disagrees in anyway with todays feminist ‘won’ opinion of how things are meant to be. So if nothing else, this is a place where women can come (though uninvited) and see that men really are pissed at todays situaton. The problem is, most that come are so indoctrinated and just simply female they resort to the usual female tactics of shame and insult. Men aren’t perfect, we accept that. If women wan’t to gain any ground at all on men in general, there’s a good place to start. Women could accept that they aren’t either, there is plenty of room for improvement in the ways that are very gender specific to them.

 
Comment by Abby
2009-11-01 22:44:50 - IP Man-Hash: 02cf66ec05ef9

“Todays man has no forum in which to air his opinions if it disagrees in anyway with todays feminist ‘won’ opinion of how things are meant to be.”

Really? I present to you:

www dot a voice for men dot com

I fully support the above site. This site just makes me ill.

 
Comment by Harry
2009-11-02 01:03:15 - IP Man-Hash: 7e922a00473bb

”I fully support the above site. This site just makes me ill.”

Thanks for the site. I’ll check it out. This site makes you sick? I think it’s meant to, so it does in fact have merit because women simply won’t listen or stfu. This site is a kind of verbal slap in the face if you like. Not condoning slaping females but understand totally what drives a man to it. Todays woman needs to take a long hard look at herself and work out where SHE might change for the better.

Keep on verbally slapping Dick.

 
 
 
 
Comment by michelle
2009-11-02 14:47:15 - IP Man-Hash: 44918fd78f011

that last one sounds like a chick! Bitches are the biggest fans of this site!

 
 
Comment by Dick Masterson
2009-10-25 14:55:36 - IP Man-Hash: 237473d762590

I am shutting this site down.

Comment by penis
2009-11-01 22:33:50 - IP Man-Hash: 81677841405d8

i will be sure to laugh at you as u fail

 
 
Comment by David
2009-10-19 21:34:07 - IP Man-Hash: 0869feae7e64b

Shut up bitch go and make yourself useful on a dick.
All women are cheating lying whores.
Hats off to dick he has opened my eyes.

 
Comment by The Empress
2009-10-16 05:33:44 - IP Man-Hash: e7b537717f78c

I pity you, Dick. And mixed with my pity is a kind of amusement. Let’s say you’re actually right, that men are better than women …

… So what?

You’re only human, as is everyone else, male or female. Sooner or later, you’ll end up in the ground, silent and with nothing more than your coffin to keep you company. What will you have accomplished or changed?

Not a damn thing. And I’m actually starting to giggle at the thought of you, smug behind your shades, thinking you’ve lived a worthwhile existence when you’re just another waste of space trying to use controversy to muscle his way into the public eye.

Tick tock, Dick. Tick tock.

 
Comment by dicks
2009-10-14 06:40:44 - IP Man-Hash: fa8ee5798cc7b

moderator is gay.

 
Comment by Haha89
2009-10-01 08:27:59 - IP Man-Hash: b2a3745f0d705

Chris=Mr. Empty-pants: http://www.maleenhancement.org/

 
Comment by Harry
2009-09-28 23:33:35 - IP Man-Hash: 3d8f0a9a7e742

Personally, I think every time a child is conceived outside of marriage (or during divorce), there should be DNA testing involved if one party claims the baby isn’t the father’s.’

So the fact that a child is conceived and delivered during marriage automatically means the male is the father? I think you have to high and unrealistic opinion of your gender guest22. DNA paternity testing at birth for all children would be fair and give the male equality with his spouse, in the fact that he would then be as certain as any man can be the child is his. Imagine this, a woman has her child, the child is then taken to another room and put with nine others, none of which have name tags and the tenth (your child) also receives none. The next day you go into the room to feed your child and ask a nurse which one is yours. She says ‘take your pick’. Your response would be? I’ll hazard a guess, ‘ I want MY F*ing baby’. You of course would be correct, what ever your response, you have the right to your own child. You now have to trust the word of the nurse that she gives you the correct child, YOUR CHILD. Welcome to the world of men.

Comment by Harry
2009-09-28 23:41:54 - IP Man-Hash: 3d8f0a9a7e742

‘ I’m not complaining, I just wish that my comments wouldn’t fall on deaf ears.’

Again, welcome to our world guest22. Feminists and females in general hear nothing from anyone who doesnt speak pro feminist. You ALL have a very unrealistc opinion of yourselves.

 
 
Comment by guest22
2009-09-24 17:58:52 - IP Man-Hash: e653f5ce150e2

@ Chris.
1. Yeah, probably wasn’t the best choice of words per se. Although Dick clearly states that if a girl wants to post, she can. ‘Sides gives him more business by increasing his RSS feeds and makes people curious to hear from more than one side of the argument. I’m not complaining, I just wish that my comments wouldn’t fall on deaf ears.
2. I intend to leave, as stated in the post below.
I’m not going to say anymore, because, as predicted, you will just flame me (and I fear I may say something rude). I still don’t take back anything I’ve said, including my comments wishing you a happy life. I know I can’t change the way you view the world and never intended to, I was just putting out another side of the story that is not given justice.
Best of luck in all you do, and I once again thank you for the conversation.
Bye! :D

Comment by dan
2009-10-08 02:07:17 - IP Man-Hash: f6ddf5e83286c

I don’t care if you are a man or a woman. YOU TYPE TOO FUCKING MUCH. Women don’t know how to fucking be concise.

 
 
Comment by 22guest
2009-09-23 17:34:31 - IP Man-Hash: a7008c5713692

“Yes. How can you PRETEND that women contribute as much as men when everyone knows women don’t even pay for the check when the waiter drops it…. NOR are women willing (or capable) of paying child support FOR THEIR OWN CHILDREN.”

That wasn’t the point. The point was that women have contributed to society in positive manners. Not that some women are usually broke.

Now when it comes to paying the check, while I can’t speak for everyone, to me it’s just a gentlemanly thing to do (such as holding the door open). Personally, I make enough money to pay for it myself. If the guy offers, then sure. But I will always offer to pay at least part (such as desert, or the tip). Not because I want to take advantage of him, but because I, personally, think it’s polite. To quote an editorial:

“Historically, the “man pays” rule makes perfect sense. Unfortunately, until recently women did not have a lot of economic opportunity in western society. Sure, women could be secretaries, teachers, or flight attendants but corporate board rooms, court rooms, and other high-paying career-paths were virtually unattainable because of the glass ceiling. In an environment where women are unfairly prevented from reaching their full economic potential by an unfair system, it makes sense for men to “pay it forward” … We’ve come a long way since then. Of course, we still have a long way to go before achieving complete economic equality between the sexes, but I think we can all be pretty proud of how far we’ve come in a relatively short period of time. Basically what I’m saying is, the original justification for the “man pays” rule is no longer valid and so the tradition should stop. On a first date, I will offer to pay as a matter of courtesy. I AM from the south, after all. Hopefully, my date will offer to pay her share. If she does, I will likely say no, but offer to let her get desert or drinks if she wants. All is well.”

To me, it’s tradition more than “I can’t pay”. I grew up in a pretty old-fashioned family, I guess.

“FACT: MEN PAY 95% OF CHILD SUPPORT…

EVEN FOR CHILDREN THAT ARE NOT THEIR OWN.”

That’s why I think reform is in order. It’s ridiculous that these men, who aren’t even remotely responsible for these children (and even those who are), have to pay SO MUCH. Granted, women who have custody do have to satisfy the emotional and nurturing needs of the child, but the father shouldn’t have to pay for much over half, if it is indeed their child!

Personally, I think every time a child is conceived outside of marriage (or during divorce), there should be DNA testing involved if one party claims the baby isn’t the father’s.

“Cute try though sweety.”

Why thank you good sir.

“It may not be “fair” to you to say “men are better than women”…. BUT WE ARE. ”

Elizabeth Dew once said “The world is not run by thought, nor by imagination, but by own opinion.” Deep, I think it is. The world is how you perceive it, and I can’t change that.

“Take a good look at the world around you. Everything you see, touch, use, take for granted and need every day of your life was created by MEN.”

Except for 50% of my genes. And just Google women inventions for a history of women contributions (many household items, and a history of why women don’t have credit due to patent laws [I did have a nice selection of links for you, but I can't post them])

I’m not belittling the work of men. Yes they’ve contributed A WHOLE LOT! I’m just saying that there are plenty of contributions by women too, while probably not nearly as much as men (but this could be caused by laws preventing proper credit and society frowning upon ‘women out of the kitchen’), female contributions do exist.

Comment by Harry
2009-09-24 15:44:16 - IP Man-Hash: 3d8f0a9a7e742

‘Now when it comes to paying the check, while I can’t speak for everyone, to me it’s just a gentlemanly thing to do (such as holding the door open).’

This was in the days befor feminism and ‘equality’ and most importantly females were ladies, something todays woman can’t possibly be called. You know longer deserve men to be gentlemen.

Comment by guest22
2009-09-24 17:31:57 - IP Man-Hash: e653f5ce150e2

I get the feeling some of you aren’t even reading my full comments. -.-
How can you say that, you don’t even know me! :D (the whole point of that previous post was that you can’t judge a group based on a select number of people). By ‘lady’ I suppose you mean a polite, refined, feminine and well-spoken? Now honestly, out of my few comments, have I ever said anything ‘offensive’, anti-male, anti-female or anything of the sort? I haven’t cursed (nor do I), I have talked in a polite manner, I have used proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation and have not talked about anything ‘un-ladylike’. How can you judge me as a horrible person based on that and a few posts!
Now, if you must know, I am a very-much church oriented person (I’m LDS) who does not spend time in bars (I do not drink) and I am a virgin waiting until marriage (sorry I said the ‘m’ word! XD). In my church, we believe that both men and women have special, yet very different, parts of God’s plan. I grew up with a unique prespective of marriage, believing that it’s not just an earthly thing, but that a man and a woman can be wedded for eternity. I was taught that men are mainly responsible for meeting the physical needs to the family, while women are more responsible for the nurturing needs. Because of our view of marriage, men are expected to treat there girlfriends/wives with respect as daughters of God (if you thought that your 1st girlfriend’s father was ticked off when you made her cry, just imagine…), and we are expected to treat men with equal respect as sons of God.

Now, I ask that my religious view points are not brought into the conversation furthur, as they are not what we are talking about. I’m just letting you know that there are decent women out there who hold old-time values and believe in Women’s Rights (to a degree).
That’s what I think modern feminists are missing. It used to be all about rights to vote and equal pay, but now they are taking feminine out of feminist by saying women are disgraceful if they are home-makers or mothers! But isn’t that the female’s natural role in nature? Can’t they be wives and mothers as well as contributors, as with the bear, who hunts her own food, feeds her children, builds/finds her own house, and so on? Feminism is about getting basic rights for women, not over-powering them. Quoting my first post:
If someone goes to the doctor with the flu and another goes to the doctor with strep, are they going to get the same medicine? No. But, they will but have their needs met. That’s what feminism and men’s rights acts should be focusing on; getting the needs of both men and women satisfied.
Anyway, for me to continue to post here would be like a teenager complaining about Barney; this site obviously was not made for me, so I shouldn’t go against it by trolling. I might respond to a few more posts (if you know, people actually take the time to READ this), but then I’m gone. If I don’t come back, it’s been very nice having this conversation with you all and I wish the best in all your lives! :)

Comment by Chris
2009-09-24 17:42:52 - IP Man-Hash: 0211d7d96e1c0

Bitch says “I get the feeling some of you aren’t even reading my full comments.”

That’s called “female intuition”.

And “NO WOMEN ALLOWED” is called “YOUR FIRST CLUE”.

Don’t bother.

Bitches leave.

Only a woman barges in uninvited and unwelcome and says “i get the feeling you are ignoring me”.

Just HOW stupid ARE these cunts?

(Comments won't nest below this level)
Comment by Watcher
2009-10-26 10:15:46 - IP Man-Hash: a88f1b791d495

LOL!!!

 
 
Comment by Harry
2009-09-28 23:37:32 - IP Man-Hash: 3d8f0a9a7e742

How can you say that, you don’t even know me!

You just got hit by the shit of generalisation, not nice is it. Men have been putting up with it from feminism for decades.

(Comments won't nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by guest22
2009-09-23 13:14:59 - IP Man-Hash: a3679899b64fb

*Ahem, I ment SHOULD NOT group them as one. Haha, that didn’t help any! ^_^;

 
Comment by guest22
2009-09-23 13:11:41 - IP Man-Hash: a3679899b64fb

This site… is interesting. I am a girl, which means that this post will obviously be flamed the heck out of, so, if you’re not an open-minded person you have the right to click the reply button and flame… : now.

If you wish to read on, be my guest. Let’s face it; men and women are different (in more than the obvious ways). Like most animals, we have differing emotions and instincts from each other. For instance, the female instinct tells them to have children, while the male instinct tells them to spread their genes (while we don’t ‘think’ this way exactly, it’s what causes us to have sexual feelings). A man who grew up in a city won’t make the same choice as a woman who grew up in the country. In a nutshell, we think different.

That’s not to say that women can’t do great things, however. Grace Hopper was an amazing computer scientist: she programmed the first programs for the Harvard Mark I, she created the first programming language compiler, and helped advance the age of modern technology. Heck, she even won the first ‘man of the year’ award from DPMA! Harriet Tubman was a resourceful Union scout and led many people, men and women, to freedom. Helen Keller was a brilliant speaker, despite being both deaf and blind (not to mention her teacher, Anne Sullivan, who developed a way for highly disabled children to learn). There was Marie Curie, a physicist and the first person to ever be awarded two Nobel Prizes. Then we have Amelia Earhart, the first to fly the Atlantic twice and fly solo to many places. Not mention authors like JK Rowling and Jane Austin.

Can you honestly say society would be as advanced today if it weren’t for the contributions of both male and females? You could say “Oh, but men would have done that anyway.” But, you know what? We’ll never know for sure, because like it or not, there has been and always will be women on this planet.

I think saying ‘all women are cheaters’ (milder term used) is a very gross generalization. It’s like saying ‘all blacks are uneducated’ or ‘all atheists are evil’; it’s simply not true. I’m not saying that there aren’t any ‘cheating’ women, ’stupid’ women, or ‘lazy’ women; I’m just saying you should group them as one. For instance, my mother is a hard-worker (she’s a professor) and is responsible for doing the bills. While my father is also a hard worker (a manager in a government position) and makes more money, budgeting is not his high point (my mother came out of college with little dept [she went to a medical school originally] without help of parents or scholarships, my father came out with more with parent assistance. Once again, this does not mean that all men are frivolous with money, just like it doesn’t mean that all women are cheaters.

When it comes to feminism, however, I do think too much is too much. I’m not saying women should have rights taken away, but I think men should have rights added. For instance, it used to be the husband would have custody over the children in a divorce case, but now, because of the Women’s Rights Movements, the wife is probably 99% more likely to gain custody. In my opinion, this isn’t fair. Men should be just as eligible as women (if they are able-bodied/minded); there is nothing that says men can’t be ‘nurturing’ or a ‘good parent’. I know children who are put in the hands of women who neglect them, while the fathers could be perfectly eligible. I also don’t like how women usually don’t have to pay as much child support; I think child support should be based off of the money the couples would have made together, and each pay based on their salaries (that way they both keep, say, 60% of their money to themselves).

All in all, I don’t feel like it’s fair to say ‘men are better than women’, ‘women are better than men’ or perhaps even ‘men and women are equal’. We’re different. If someone goes to the doctor with the flu and another goes to the doctor with strep, are they going to get the same medicine? No. But, they will but have their needs met. That’s what feminism and men’s rights acts should be focusing on; getting the needs of both men and women satisfied. A man should have just as much right to custody (if eligible) and a woman should have just as much pay as a man (if she is just as good in that same profession).

Comment by Chris
2009-09-23 15:00:53 - IP Man-Hash: 0211d7d96e1c0

Can you honestly say society would be as advanced today if it weren’t for the contributions of both male and females?

Yes. How can you PRETEND that women contribute as much as men when everyone knows women don’t even pay for the check when the waiter drops it…. NOR are women willing (or capable) of paying child support FOR THIER OWN CHILDREN.

FACT: MEN PAY 95% OF CHILD SUPPORT…
EVEN FOR CHILDREN THAT ARE NOT THEIR OWN.

Cute try though sweety.

It may not be “fair” to you to say “men are better than women”…. BUT WE ARE.

Take a good look at the world around you. Everything you see, touch, use, take for granted and need every day of your life was created by MEN.

Menarebetterthanwomen.

Comment by chris
2009-10-01 02:19:44 - IP Man-Hash: 912eafcbf9ff6

FACT: MEN PAY 95% OF CHILD SUPPORT…
EVEN FOR CHILDREN THAT ARE NOT THEIR OWN.

Good, men are so obviously inferior that they deserve for women to bleed them dry. Or, at least, the men who post to this site deserve it.

Comment by Haha89
2009-10-01 07:58:41 - IP Man-Hash: b2a3745f0d705

Chris=Mr. Empty-pants

(Comments won't nest below this level)
 
Comment by Chris
2009-10-01 08:09:53 - IP Man-Hash: 0211d7d96e1c0

HaHa89 – Mrs. Empty Cunt.

(Comments won't nest below this level)
Comment by Haha89
2009-10-01 08:13:43 - IP Man-Hash: b2a3745f0d705

Hahahahahahahaha!!! Wrong!!! Hahahahahahahahaha!!!

 
Comment by Chris
2009-10-01 09:08:59 - IP Man-Hash: 0211d7d96e1c0

Saying “wrong” doesn’t make a man wrong.

Failure.

 
Comment by Haha89
2009-10-01 09:27:52 - IP Man-Hash: b2a3745f0d705

Hahahahahahahaha!!!! Yes it DOES!!! Hahahahahahahahaha!!!!

 
Comment by Tara King
2009-10-26 08:56:09 - IP Man-Hash: 303539ec7ac49

Good point. I think, really, in the name of progress, the differences between men and women need to be acknowledged and accommodated. Like you say, there are always going to be women in the world, and there are always going to be men in the world…so lets just deal with each other in a courteous and practical manner. This website, while pretty funny, doesn’t really offer any proper, workable, practical answer for dissatisfied men OR women. Come on, people, let’s be a bit more mature about this.

Or…as I predict you will…you can tell me to fuck off or something in that vein. I don’t really mind.

 
Comment by Chris
2009-10-26 09:54:09 - IP Man-Hash: 0211d7d96e1c0

There is nothing wrong with the differences between men and women. Its worked itself out for millions of years.

Where it has all started to go to shit was when women faught, struggled and insisted that their ARE no differences. That they are “equal”.

AND THATS A LIE.

Because not even MEN are equal to EACH OTHER.

If everyone were “equal”…..
There would be no such thing as EXCEPTIONAL.

That’s when you get LAZY.
Saying “everyone is special” is POISON.

LAZY women who sit their with their fucking arms folded not really DOING ANYTHING because she is so brainwashed to think she is automatically equal and entitled to EVERYTHING….. and “special”.

“I deserve this.
I deserve that.
I deserve better.
I deserve more.”

These women (who only surfaced in the last few decades) are fucking DOOMED.

 
 
 
Comment by Janet Brown
2009-10-26 01:01:59 - IP Man-Hash: 7d2331eca0c66

WELL. FUCK. YOU.
Ok, many contributions have been made by men, much more than by women. But that is just due to sexism – men have nearly always been the ones who were educated and given all the proper priveledges. And no, its not because they are ‘better’. Its because for whatever reason they have become more powerful (probably because in neanderthal times they benefited from having greater physical strength than women) and they enjoy that power.
And anyway, how would you feel if YOU were a woman?

Comment by Harry
2009-10-26 02:25:41 - IP Man-Hash: 6ec063d659c2e

WELL. FUCK. YOU.
{{Ok, many contributions have been made by men, much more than by women. But that is just due to sexism – men have nearly always been the ones who were educated and given all the proper priveledges.}}

Heard it befor and rejected it as nonsense. Their contribtuions these days are? Please, don’t confuse attending work and actually working hard all day.

(Comments won't nest below this level)
Comment by Harry
2009-10-26 02:27:11 - IP Man-Hash: 6ec063d659c2e

Women treat ‘work’ like its a social event, all that’s missing is the strippers and the booze.

 
 
Comment by benignbullet
2009-10-26 04:00:42 - IP Man-Hash: 540f95f4d5a0c

“WELL. FUCK. YOU.
Ok, many contributions have been made by men, much more than by women. But that is just due to sexism…”

Ahhhh…the old “Oppression theory of underachievement”

HOW, pray tell, is it SEXISM, or “role differential,” or any of the other b.s. excuses you whimmin come up with to try to explain-away men being BETTER at these activities, when:

*The United States Patent Act of 1790 provided EQUAL opportunity to receive patents for invention submissions

*Even with modern day affirmative action-type programs and encouragements, MEN are STILL (just like before, dingbat) FAR AND AWAY outperforming you in the areas of invention, discovery, etc. (yes, even as the little ladies have been – SINCE 1982 in the United States – receiving MORE b.s. degrees than men, including many areas of science)

*”Sexism” has NOTHING – are ya hearin’ me here, nelly – NOTHING to do with whether or not patents are granted, discoveries made, or cultures improved/advanced

S T O P blaming your deficiencies – material or relational – on MEN.

Intellectual Property Owners Association’s Inventions/Discoveries of the Year Award, 1974 – present>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

http://www.ipo.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=National_Inventor_Of_The_Ye ar_Award1&Template=/CM/HTMLDisplay.cfm&ContentID=17088

Notice the ratio of around 8:1, men to whimmin? (and whimmin who “invent” or “discover” are usually on TEAMS which include MEN – MEN have MANY more INDIVIDUAL contributions, if anyone cares to check beyond this list, as well).

SpaceCadets,Indeed…Whimmin

(Comments won't nest below this level)
Comment by Harry
2009-10-26 08:25:08 - IP Man-Hash: 6ec063d659c2e

Much better answer than mine. Trouble is she’ll/they’ll ignore fact as usual and focus on sugar and spice and all things nice.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Watcher
2009-09-23 16:39:11 - IP Man-Hash: dc2258566578b

I would like to respond, guest22, to your assertion that society would not be as advanced today had not the likes of Grace Hopper, Helen Keller or Amelia Earhart graced the pages of history.

Well I’ll see your Marie Curie and raise you an Stephen Hawkins. Actually I’ll raise you:

Albert Schweitzer, Chiune Sugihara, Raoul Wallenberg, Martin Luther King, Jr., Desmond Tutu, The Dalai Lama, Han Dongfang, Lao Zi [Lao Tzu] , Confucius, Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Niccolo Machiavelli, John Locke, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Karl Marx, Hammurabi, Alexander the Great, Asoka, Shi Huangdi, Julius Caesar, Charlemagne, Kublai Khan, Peter the Great, George Washington, Napoleon Bonaparte, Simon Bolivar, Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Zoroaster, Muhammad, Buddha, Moses, Jesus Christ, Martin Luther, Johann Sebastian Bach, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, Ludwig van Beethoven, Richard Wagner, Arturo Toscanini, George Gershwin, Louis Armstrong, The Beatles, Homer, Virgil, Dante Alighieri, William Shakespeare, Moliere, Charles Dickens, Mark Twain, Bertolt Brecht, Michelangelo, Rembrandt, Christopher Wren, Katsushika Hokusai, Joseph Mallord William Turner, Vincent van Gogh, Frank Lloyd Wright, Pablo Picasso, Le Corbusier, Charlie Chaplin, Jean Renoir, Sergei Eisenstein, Henri Cartier-Bresson, Orson Welles, Steven Spielberg, Euclid, Archimedes, Leonardo da Vinci, Galileo Galilei, Isaac Newton, Michael Faraday, Charles Darwin, Louis Pasteur, Joseph Lister, Sigmund Freud, Albert Einstein, Alexander Fleming, Linus Pauling, James Watson and Francis Crick, Zai Lun, Johannes Gutenberg, Samuel Morse, Nikolaus Otto, Alfred Nobel, Alexander Graham Bell, Thomas Alva Edison, Orville Wright and Wilbur Wright, Guglielmo Marconi, Marco Polo, Christopher Columbus, Ferdinand Magellan, Roald Amundsen, Yuri Gagarin and Neil Armstrong.

Nope, the world would be pretty much as it is, even if women such as Anne Sullivan had never been born.

Men built society both figuratively and literally. The contributions of women pale in comparison to that of men, I’m not deliberately being needlessly cruel, I’m merely honest.

Comment by guest22
2009-09-24 13:22:03 - IP Man-Hash: 65ff8670b005b

As stated earlier, I am not belittling the work of men what so ever, and I’m sorry if that’s what you took from that. The only thing I was pointing out is that women have done things that men haven’t to improve society. I’ll give you (By last name, first name or title, alpha order):

Abdellah, Faye Glenn Abzug , Bella Adams, Abigail Addams, Jane Albright, Madeleine Korbel Alcott, Louisa May Allen, Florence Ellinwood Alvarado, Linda G. Andersen, Dorothy H. Anderson, Marian Andrus, Ethel Percy Angelou, Maya Anthony, Susan B. Apgar, Virginia Baker, Ella Ball, Lucille Bancroft , Ann Barton, Clara Baum, Eleanor K. Benedict, Ruth Fulton Bethune, Mary McLeod Blackwell, Antoinette Blackwell, Elizabeth Blackwell, Emily Bloomer, Amelia Bly, Nellie Bourke-White, Margaret Bradley, Lydia Moss Bradwell, Myra Breckinridge, Mary Brooks, Gwendolyn Buck , Pearl S. Bumpers, Betty Bunch, Charlotte Ann Cabrini, St. Frances Xavier Calderone, M.D., Mary Steichen Cannon, Annie Jump Carson, Rachel Carter, Eleanor Rosalynn Smith Cary, Mary Ann Shadd Cassatt, Mary Cather, Willa Catt, Carrie Chapman Child, Julia Child, Lydia Maria Chisholm, Shirley Clinton, Hillary Rodham Cochran, Jacqueline Coleman, Bessie Collins, Eileen Colvin, Ruth Colwell, Rita Rossi Cooney, Joan Ganz Cope, Mother Marianne Cori , Gerty Theresa Radnitz Croly, Jane Cunningham Davis, Paulina Kellogg Wright Day, Dorothy de Forest, Marian de Varona, Donna DeVoe, Emma Smith Dickinson, Emily Dix, Dorothea Dole, Elizabeth Hanford Douglas, Marjory Stoneman Dudley, Anne Dallas Dyer, Mary Barret Earhart , Amelia Earle, Ph.D., Sylvia East, Catherine Eastman, Crystal Eddy, Mary Baker Edelman, Marian Wright Ederle, Gertrude “Trudy” Elion, Gertrude Belle Evans, Alice Ferraro, Geraldine Fitzgerald, Ella Friedan, Betty Fuller, Margaret Gage, Matilda Joslyn Gibson, Althea Gilbreth, Lillian Moller Gilman , Charlotte Perkins Ginsburg, Ruth Bader Graham, Katharine Grasso, Ella Griffiths, Martha Wright Grimke, Sarah Grimke Weld, Angelina Hallaren, Mary A. Hamer, Fannie Lou Hamilton, Alice Harper, Martha Matilda Harris, Patricia Roberts Hayes, Helen Height, Dorothy Hicks, Beatrice A. Hobby , Oveta Culp Holdridge, Barbara Holladay, Wilhelmina Cole Holm USAF (Ret.), Major General Jeanne Holt, Bertha Hopper, Grace Murray Howe, Julia Ward Huerta, Dolores Hunt, Helen LaKelly Hunt, Swanee Hurston , Zora Neale Hutchinson, Anne Jackson, Shirley Ann Jacobi, Mary Jacobs, Frances Wisebart Jemison, Mae Jones, “Mother” Mary Harris Jordan, Barbara Keller, Helen Kelly, Bishop Leontine Kelsey, Ph.D., M.D., Frances Kathleen Oldham Keohane, Nannerl O. King, Billie Jean Kübler-Ross, Elisabeth Kuhn, Maggie Kwolek, Stephanie L. La Flesche, Susette LaDuke, Winona Lange, Dorothea Leet, Mildred Robbins Lin, Maya Y. Lindbergh, Anne Morrow Locke, Patricia A. Lockwood, Belva Low, Juliette Gordon Lucid, Shannon W. Lyon, Mary Mahoney, Mary Mankiller, Wilma Mayer, Maria Goeppert McClintock, Barbara McCormick, Katherine Dexter McManus, Louise Mead, Margaret Mink, Patsy Takemoto Mitchell, Maria Motley, Constance Baker Mott, Lucretia Mullany, Kate Novello, Antonia O’Connor, Sandra Day O’Keeffe, Georgia Oakley, Annie Parks, Rosa Paul, Alice Pennington, Mary Engle Perkins, Frances Peterson, Esther Pipher, Judith L. Rankin, Jeannette Reno, Janet Richards, Ellen Swallow Richards, Linda Ride, Sally Ridgway, Rozanne L. Rogers, Edith Nourse Roosevelt, Eleanor Rose, Ernestine Louise Potowski Roulet, Sister Elaine Rudolph, Wilma Ruffin, Josephine St. Pierre Sabin, Florence Sacagawea, Sanger, Margaret Saubel, Katherine Siva Schiess , Betty Bone Schroeder, Patricia Schwartz, Felice N. Scott, Blanche Stuart Seibert, Florence Seton, Elizabeth Bayley Shaw, Reverend Doctor Anna Howard Shouse, Catherine Filene Shriver, Eunice Mary Kennedy Siebert, Muriel Sills, Beverly Smith, Bessie Smith, Margaret Chase Smith, Sophia Solomon, Hannah Greenebaum Stanton, Elizabeth Cady Steinem, Gloria Stephens, Helen Stevens, Nettie Stone, Lucy Stowe, Harriet Beecher Strong, Harriet Williams Russell Sullivan, Anne Szold, Henrietta Talbert, Mary Burnett Tallchief, Maria Tarbell, Ida Taussig, Helen Brooke The Virgin Mary Truth, Sojourner Tubman, Harriet Vaught USAF (Ret.) , Brigadier General Ruth Wilma Wald, Florence Wald, Lillian Walker, Madam C. J. Walker, M.D., Mary Warner, Emily Howell Warren, Mercy Otis Wattleton, Faye Wauneka, Annie Dodge Wells-Barnett, Ida B. Welty, Eudora Wharton, Edith Widnall, Sheila E. Willard, Frances Winfrey, Oprah Winnemucca, Sarah Woodhull, Victoria Wright, Fanny Wright, Martha Coffin Pelham Wu, Chien-Shiung Yalow, Rosalyn Yerkovich, Gloria Zaharias, Mildred “Babe” Didrikson

You say that is would pretty much be as it is? That is a bold statement, if I do say so myself:

“Do I dare disturb the universe?
In a minute there is time for decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse.”

Every action has a reaction. If you take out Lisa Gherardini del Giocondo, then do we have the Mona Lisa? If we take out Grace Hopper, would we ever have a compiler? If we took out Mary, would we ever have a Jesus? If we had no hate, would we know love? If we told no lie, then would we know truth? The universe is a very fragile thing. Everyone is generally put in the right place at the right time. Saying ‘Life would be the same without so-and-so’ could change the fabric of reality itself. I would never be so bold as to say “I think society would be just as well off without [said person]“. While men do earn the credit for many, many, amazing things, women have also done some amazing things. As I said earlier, I’m not saying girls are better, or boys are, I’m just saying that it is a 100% proven fact that women have contributed positively, a few which you can see in my list of over 250 people.

“Men built society both figuratively and literally.”

No offense, but you wear that like it’s a badge of honor! ^_^ You’re saying it’s 100% the actions of men that we have a functioning government, amazing cultures, brilliant technology, mass genocide, 80% of the world living on less than 10 USD a day, diseases spreading like the plague (literally XD), and horrible human relations? Now I hardly think it’s fair to give men all the credit, for both the good and the bad. Women live in this world too. They contribute to society whether it be through caring for the home, raising a family, inventing new technologies, or writing amazing works of art. That’s not to say that women always are good, heck no. Just as there are men such as Hitler, there are some REALLY horrible women. And just focusing on the bad takes you nowhere. For instance, for years blacks were never given a true opportunity to show what they can do. Does that mean that they can’t do anything positive? By all means no! Many have certainly have proven themselves to be invaluable members of society. Same with women, for years it has been frown upon for women to work outside of the home, and now they mostly have the opportunity to contribute. Does this mean everyone uses that power for good? No! Just as Hitler abused his power as dictator, there are women who will abuse their power. But, what are we going to do? There are stupid people in this world, both male and female, and we can’t do much of anything about it but smile and say “Silly little fool” and continue our day without making further judgment about people until they show us who they are.

 
Comment by Harry
2009-09-24 15:48:53 - IP Man-Hash: 3d8f0a9a7e742

Watcher:: Well said. Unfortunately I fear it probably fell on deaf ears as per usual with a woman.

Comment by Watcher
2009-09-25 15:47:16 - IP Man-Hash: dc2258566578b

‘Pearl before swine’. My sin.

(Comments won't nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by Harry
2009-09-18 11:39:55 - IP Man-Hash: 3d8f0a9a7e742

the fems that posted as chris’s mom and as skandal (with small s so not Skandal)

Your posts prove our point you’re underhanded fuckwits.

 
Comment by Captain
2009-09-16 17:09:12 - IP Man-Hash: 893a747a6c175

THIS is what happens when you put a fucking woman in charge of anything. This stupid “equality” bullshit is getting in the way of human adMANcement.

Get back to the kitchen and try not to lose any dishes.

 
Comment by Emily
2009-09-16 05:33:38 - IP Man-Hash: fd15b80fa5de8

you are such a horrible person.
sexism of this kind should be banned. It is disgraceful. Anyone who treats women like this is a dickhead and that is exactly what you are!!
if u were a woman then u would be a bitchy whore and have no friends or sex, ur male equivalent is worse but i rly think u should get over yourself

Comment by Harry
2009-09-16 07:32:01 - IP Man-Hash: 3d8f0a9a7e742

Emily:: I think I can almost hear you screeching from here, you do realise the high pitched voice doesn’t make anything you say truer. On a serious note, if you want to put a stop to sexism today, you really need to be looking towards your own gender, you’ll find this site and others that will no doubt follow were inevitable, given they way todays woman is royaly shafting men.

 
Comment by Jack-The-Ripper!
2009-09-18 12:28:32 - IP Man-Hash: 5359fb9f2342e

ALL MY BROTHERS RISE UP! ALL THE MEN RIPSE UP IT”S TIME WE TOOK THIS MAN MADE WORLD BACK IN OUR HANDS! ALL HAIL PATRIARCHY! MALE SUPREMACY FOREVER! BROTHERS LET”S GET THIS WAR STARTED!

 
Comment by Bristol
2009-09-23 10:36:44 - IP Man-Hash: 4d3daac3117e4

Emily: STFU. I figured your argument against him would of course HAVE TO bring up the subject of sex. That’s all you bitches ever think about. So shutup, your the whore.

 
 
Comment by Harry
2009-09-15 22:51:35 - IP Man-Hash: 3d8f0a9a7e742

Thanks for the link Watcher:: Way to go Lady Deech. I’m suprised it’s taken the rich so long to react to this clear missuse of the institution of marriage. The rich have allways been so good at protecting their wealth in the past. Paul McCartney is no doubt a wiser man now than he was befor his last marriage. I really don’t know why anyone with more than a little money that would actually like a child doesn’t do what gay couples have the right to do, employ a surrogate mother, or does this right not extend to single males?

 
Comment by Harry
2009-09-13 09:52:13 - IP Man-Hash: 3d8f0a9a7e742

Chris:: Rise above the rediculous tits baiting you mate. Btw, I don’t hide behind a false persona either, my names Harry real life. I also am pro male in life as in talk to people including females about this shit, including my anti feminist views. My angle is to be middle of the road, point out the obvious with logic, this is for you Jack, getting people to listen with radical shit like a potential terrorist isn’t the way to go, the world has too many of them allready, you’ll reach far more people being logical.

Comment by ashley
2009-09-14 09:18:12 - IP Man-Hash: e21aa02468b5d

harry earlier this morning jack said some shit like we are tracing this bitch to her house we are gonna make her pay for what women have done. I find if you let it roll off he will give up. he is attention craving ,more worse than a woman from all the threads i have read. there is no reason for you to feminist jack if you believe your better than them let em alone. I dont like feminist either but im not going to blow their cunts apart from all the shit you said in here compared to the ioother men you give men a bad name. this is coming from a woman you should ashamed of yourself. take your cock and shove it in a light socket i dont even think the men in here want you to reproduce. also im not scarred of you first off because you already talk in caps anyways, secondly your to hick to track anyones IP address.

Comment by ashley
2009-09-14 09:21:02 - IP Man-Hash: e21aa02468b5d

missed sum words my bad reason for you to kill feminist. you should be ashamed

 
Comment by Harry
2009-09-15 03:38:53 - IP Man-Hash: 3d8f0a9a7e742

I’m still not 100% it’s even a male posting as Jack, if he is in fact male 1: He needs to settle down acting like a crazy banshee is unbecoming of a male. 2: No-one with an ounce of sanity is going to listen.

 
Comment by Harry
2009-09-15 05:00:51 - IP Man-Hash: 3d8f0a9a7e742

Ashley:: I’m a male it’s my natural instinct to protect children and females. However my main concern with Jack is the way he speaks gives feminists more fuel for their fire. Dick is in my opinion approaching this differently in that he’s pointing out the obvious with satire, even this infuriates the narrow minded feminists. They can only dish it out not take it, another way in which I believe psychologists would agree with me, they show their inferiority complexes.

Comment by Watcher
2009-09-15 06:12:15 - IP Man-Hash: b1b866bd14bd2

Agreed Harry, Article of interest
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/8256368.stm

(Comments won't nest below this level)
 
Comment by Jayell
2009-09-20 11:05:02 - IP Man-Hash: 27de010962b5a

Protecting children I can understand. They deserve it and need it. But women? They’re big enough, devious enough, greedy enough to look after themselves.

(Comments won't nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by studioline
2009-09-14 09:47:46 - IP Man-Hash: e9050a977a95d

I agree with you Harry that we men should not repeat what for ages goes on – A new grup of people makes a new regime over the old group formerly in power.

First of all Feminazi is not down yet. To defeat it men need just 3 things
- speak the truth,
- be heard as a group
- do it within the right strategy.
If women agree with us then even better. This is afer all the goal, to have women see our point and change their behavior towards men to fair/ correct one, working out for everybody.

I doubt that from guys on this site a grup can be made. I tried like couple of times to form it and it never cought any interest. I even have the whole strategy in my head so if it was meant to be guys would pick it up. If they did not, it won’t happen, then.

And I do not blame men for this. Each of us has his own reason/ pleasure to be here and post.

For ex

I do not think Jack is gonna track or kill anyone. He is just dissapointed with women, and he hopes that something could be done fast.

Chris is a cool man and my friend. He is here not to agree with /kiss up to any female. He just gives them more ass kick than they can ever give to him.

You Harry I like your apporach too – pointing out the obvious in here and in life.

This post was meant for all of us to communicate even better.

Comment by Harry
2009-09-15 03:44:06 - IP Man-Hash: 3d8f0a9a7e742

Works for me, being logical comes natural to me, I’m male. Theres the problem reaching females though, so few appear to actually be capable of implimenting it.

 
 
Comment by Watcher
2009-09-25 15:55:30 - IP Man-Hash: dc2258566578b

Harry:: “you’ll reach far more people being logical.”

Good luck being logical with Raisa, usemenonly and ‘Every other female poster bar none’. Let me know how it turns out.

Just joking with you buddy.

 
 
Comment by Jack-The-Ripper
2009-09-06 21:37:03 - IP Man-Hash: 12d94e087bfcd

RUN CUNTS RUN WE ARE COMING FOR YOU! SHOT-GUN IN THE FACE PUSSY ANS ASS! BLOWING CUNTS TO SMITHEREENS!

 
Comment by Andrew
2009-09-06 10:26:36 - IP Man-Hash: 39abb5435a760

That video is priceless! She didn’t even make an attempt to hang onto that tool bag. She pushed it aside and continued going through the larger bag like she was trying to find her tiny little cell phone at the bottom of her purse.

Comment by Skandal
2009-09-06 11:03:58 - IP Man-Hash: 301ff38ad88b9

Just goes to show how stupid a bitch can be, even in outer space. It’s a good thing there were no lives at stake.

 
Comment by Jack-The-Ripper
2009-09-06 21:33:08 - IP Man-Hash: 12d94e087bfcd

HUNT DOWN THE BITCHES! HUNT DOWN THE WHORES!

 
 
Comment by connor
2009-08-27 11:04:40 - IP Man-Hash: b0ab3632c7e58

this was one of the funniest and most logical articles ive ever read in my life.. and your diagram is my facebook profile picture

 
Comment by David
2009-08-24 08:13:09 - IP Man-Hash: af67f23689566

Women suck at everything.
They cant do anything.
They’re a waste of time and they’re a waste of space.
No pun intended lol.

Comment by J-DUB
2009-09-06 19:11:28 - IP Man-Hash: 29dfbaa3d8cbf

hahahahaha i love it

 
 

Close
E-mail It
Powered by ShareThis