Women Have Lead For Brains

Recently a woman was shot six times in the head and none of the bullets penetrated her skull.

What a fucking surprise I said to the television who told me about it. The pen is supposedly mightier than the sword, right? If something as powerful as an idea can’t penetrate the invulnerable layer of a woman’s particle board skull, what makes anyone think a fucking bullet could?

Women are like cockroaches. Their stupid opinions could survive a nuclear holocaust.

Here’s a fun mantivity that proves all the points I’ve ever made. In a matter of seconds, think of a question no woman can answer. You’re a man, so that should be easy for you. You probably think of several hundred every day without even realising it.

Here’s an example:

What the fuck happened to the television?

You can substitute whatever you want for ‘the television’. Usually your particular blank will have electronics in it, but it could easily be ‘our marriage’ or ‘your ass’. The point is a woman fucked it up when you weren’t looking. She also won’t be able to answer that question.

Now here’s the game: just keep repeating the question. Women are in their own little worlds of denial and delusion; and just like a bunch of bullets your words will completely fail to penetrate the thick mantle of a woman’s brain shell.

If you can’t explain something to a woman using crayons and construction paper, don’t bother. You’re firing blanks.

Literally (Figuratively though)

Related Articles:

RSS feed | Trackback URI

62 Comments in 62 threads.»

Comment by Dustin
2008-06-08 19:54:03

Hahaha I love this one, it’s perfect.

 
Comment by mike paahana
2008-03-02 17:59:00

das y my gf so dence, but now da lead go to her ass

 
Comment by Billy
2006-12-06 07:50:55

gwallan said:

@Female
You are not boring.
Some other adjectives maybe but never boring.

I beg to differ.

 
Comment by gwallan
2006-12-05 20:20:24

Female said:
Phillazyjournalist, I see your living up to your reputation as a journalist. You have misquoted Ian and put his words in my mouth. Good job.

wolfe, the fallen trees all over your land have skewed my boyer-linquist coordinates and had me move to a less hostile climate. Thankfully there are no noxious paint fumes in my new little den.

phillazyjournalist said:

You want me to actually find out who said what before making sweeping statements? And people normally do that?

It is slightly unfortunate, if they weren’t your words, but by God they were boring. Mind you: “boyer-linquist coordinates and had me move to a less hostile climate..” Do you genuinely talk like that? A little pretentious, non?

@phillazyjournalist
It’s generally a good idea to look around a bit before you start insulting the regulars so, yes, you maybe should find out. Particularly relevant in an environment where some satire is involved.

Female’s comment was quite clearly directed at wolfe and he would have understood precisely what she meant.

@Female
You are not boring.
Some other adjectives maybe but never boring.

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-12-05 05:55:55

@Billy Indeed.
@Phillazyjournalist On the contrary, the site is filled with humor. One has but to look.

I really shouldn’t Kerr, but I think Female was misspelling Boyer-Lindquist.

-wolfe

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-12-05 05:52:01

The “boyer-linquist coordinates” were an anonymous quote of Amefuto Mom. I’m sure that clears things a hell of a lot, eh? I can’t remember whether Amefuto Mom (alias Zogmama) said precisely that or Female paraphrased for stylistic effect.

Sorry, I can’t be arsed to look and link. And I’m not sure the blog owner would approve of me taking the liberty.

Cheers.

- The Chemical Brothers - Galaxy Bounce

 
Comment by Female
2006-12-05 05:21:14

phillazyjournalist said:

You want me to actually find out who said what before making sweeping statements? And people normally do that?

The irony is killing me. You’re not a real journalist are you now?

It is slightly unfortunate, if they weren’t your words, but by God they were boring. Mind you: “boyer-linquist coordinates and had me move to a less hostile climate..? Do you genuinely talk like that? A little pretentious, non?

Strangely enough, no, I don’t normally talk like that and again, your investigative skills have let you down. I hope you hang around to play and continue to tell me I am very boring, for you are far more amusing than you know.

 
Comment by phillazyjournalist
2006-12-05 05:01:50

You want me to actually find out who said what before making sweeping statements? And people normally do that?

It is slightly unfortunate, if they weren’t your words, but by God they were boring. Mind you: “boyer-linquist coordinates and had me move to a less hostile climate..” Do you genuinely talk like that? A little pretentious, non?

Female said:

Phillazyjournalist, I see your living up to your reputation as a journalist. You have misquoted Ian and put his words in my mouth. Good job.

wolfe, the fallen trees all over your land have skewed my boyer-linquist coordinates and had me move to a less hostile climate. Thankfully there are no noxious paint fumes in my new little den.

 
Comment by Billy
2006-12-04 21:32:21

Wolfe you spoke too soon. But it’s just like a woman to disappoint…

 
Comment by Female
2006-12-04 12:49:00

Phillazyjournalist, I see your living up to your reputation as a journalist. You have misquoted Ian and put his words in my mouth. Good job.

wolfe, the fallen trees all over your land have skewed my boyer-linquist coordinates and had me move to a less hostile climate. Thankfully there are no noxious paint fumes in my new little den.

 
Comment by phillazyjournalist
2006-12-04 10:29:13

See, that’s more amusing. And yes, I am a tad on the unkind side, but it doesn’t appear to be a site filled with love, joy and happyness.
Thank you for the welcome

wolfe said:

Phillazyjournalist, Female has apparently thankfully finally accepted advice and vanished. That said, you’re a trifle unkind, especially for a newcomer. I’m a wolf; I defend the pack. She was a pack member, albeit the crazy one on the outskirts that lapped lead-based paint.

She was smart enough to not make what she wrote pseudo-intellectual. She meant it, and wrote it sincerely.

Now, you’re welcome to the site. Enjoy.

-wolfe

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-12-04 10:14:33

Phillazyjournalist, Female has apparently thankfully finally accepted advice and vanished. That said, you’re a trifle unkind, especially for a newcomer. I’m a wolf; I defend the pack. She was a pack member, albeit the crazy one on the outskirts that lapped lead-based paint.

She was smart enough to not make what she wrote pseudo-intellectual. She meant it, and wrote it sincerely.

Now, you’re welcome to the site. Enjoy.

-wolfe

 
Comment by phillazyjournalist
2006-12-04 09:47:39

God, that’s a laugh a minute. Couldn’t you try a bit harder and squeeze a few more big words in there? I’m sure your target audience are truly captivated

Ian McLeod said:

Female said:

The figure is closer to 200 million, but your assertion as to “most exacerbated by religious conflict” is misinformation perpetrated by pseudo-intellectuals who are biased against religion Quantitatively, yes, most individual conflicts do have a religious connection, so what they are saying is true, but their implication is that religion causes more…

 
Comment by Ian McLeod
2006-11-18 15:05:21

Wolfe, thank you for your remarks. I was unaware of that particular piece of information, but it certainly makes sense.

 
Comment by Female
2006-11-18 14:46:22

A very interesting analysis to read, Ian, although you seem to have read my comment as saying that religious conflict has been justification - casus belli - for wars, when what I said was that it has exacerbated wars.

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-11-18 10:34:34

Ian McLeod said:

The figure is closer to 200 million, but your assertion as to “most exacerbated by religious conflict” is misinformation perpetrated by pseudo-intellectuals who are biased against religion Quantitatively, yes, most individual conflicts do have a religious connection, so what they are saying is true, but their implication is that religion causes more bloodshed than non-religion. In terms of actual loss of life, however, most bloodshed in the 20th century was caused by Communist atheists.

Very well said, Iain. Quite true.

The IRA conflict in Ireland, Catholics versus Protestants, has a whopping 2000 casualties. Combined wars caused by militant Christians over a strictly religious casus belli account for fewer than 100,000 deaths globally in the last century.

It’s worth noting that even this conflict had a substantial atheistic/communist link. Many of the core IRA were Marxist revolutionaries who sought to establish a ‘People’s Republic’ in Ireland.

-wolfe

 
Comment by Ian McLeod
2006-11-18 09:51:24

Female said:

In the last 100 years, 160 million people have died in wars and genocides. The vast majority perpetuated by men and most exacerbated by religious conflict. In other words, put the bible down Billy, you’re a terrible preacher and are quoting it to win a point and promote further conflict, not to be a peacemaker.

The figure is closer to 200 million, but your assertion as to “most exacerbated by religious conflict” is misinformation perpetrated by pseudo-intellectuals who are biased against religion Quantitatively, yes, most individual conflicts do have a religious connection, so what they are saying is true, but their implication is that religion causes more bloodshed than non-religion. In terms of actual loss of life, however, most bloodshed in the 20th century was caused by Communist atheists. Let me give you a breakdown of who caused what wars. I’ll combine civillian and military deaths (where available and not already combined), since all humans are equal. I’ve taken figures from several of the top Google sites for “wars and casualties of 20th century,” and those sites in turn have citations. One excellent site has a list accounting for about 160,000,000 of the deaths: http://www.scaruffi.com/politics/massacre.html

Of course, available data is inconsistent in many conflicts, so any effort to create a 100% accurate tally of deaths is impossible.

My math brought me to about 190,000,000 deaths. This figure does not include deaths from plagues during the aftermaths of conflicts except where they were included in my source data. I’m going to round my percentages somewhat below:

27,970,000 deaths were caused directly by strictly religious/racist conflict and genocide in the past century. About half of these deaths were caused by Islamic states, with the balance going to tribal conflicts and the Holocost.

Communism (atheist regimes) accounted for more than half the bloodshed, coming in at 102,200,000 deaths. This is only accounting for available figures, the actual number of deaths is unknown and could be as high as 120,000,000 (most of the unaccounted would come from China). I include 1/3rd of the World War II casualties in this, though that particular figure isn’t the most accurate. Atheist fanaticism killed far more people than religious fanaticism.

The balance of the figure (about 60,000,000) are the result of other economic and political issues (tariffs, breaches of treaty, contested boundaries, etc.) including 2/3rds of the deaths of World War II. Most of the states involved have religious majorities, but religion was not a strong enough casus belli to be a credible argument.

The IRA conflict in Ireland, Catholics versus Protestants, has a whopping 2000 casualties. Combined wars caused by militant Christians over a strictly religious casus belli account for fewer than 100,000 deaths globally in the last century.

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-11-18 08:16:35

Being on the wrong side of a nasty truth doesn’t make the latter any less so.

- Music Instructor - Break Dance

 
Comment by son of the suns
2006-11-18 06:34:54

sonyad said:

Empires still pwn Republics, btw.

- deep dish - dreams

I can’t believe a Romanian is saying this.

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-11-18 02:03:09

And a spanking good riddens to mister Friedman:

-Fuck you, el Presidente!

I apologise for writing ill to the croaked.

- Prodigy - Girls

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-11-17 23:21:12

Empires still pwn Republics, btw.

- deep dish - dreams

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-11-17 23:13:40

LucasFilms should ask Blizzard for permission and do a film after the StarCraft plot and its concurring lesser plots. That would ‘pwn’ that unduely prolonged pansy pants sci-fi soap real good.

A few seconds sequence of the Yamato cannon spitting a pee alone would pwn the death star pansy shot.

- ’80s - ‘80 Irene Cara - Fame

 
Comment by son of the suns
2006-11-17 22:26:34

I hold no affection towards EP1 or EP2 either, but ROTS is the apple of my eye.

The darkness, the revenge, the complex plot by Palpatine brought to fruition.. Trade Federation and Separatist leaders duped and killed, the Republic turned Empire in one day.

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-11-17 22:18:53

The 3 prequels were dreadful compared to ANH, Empire. RotS — and I share your liking for the Dark Side Blog from which you gained your name — was oversaturated in special effects and featured terrible acting and direction.

The story was not bad, but the rest?

-wolfe

 
Comment by son of the suns
2006-11-17 17:39:56

wolfe, you think ROTS was the worst EP? I may have to disown you.

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-11-17 16:54:23

Billy said:

Prehaps you’re being a bit hard on tomales here!

@Billy, diamatik, I tend to concur. If there’s anything good in Marin county, Tamales has to be part of it. (I’m not sure I count Lucasfilm anymore after RoTS). I do like the bottom picture of the F-18C/D flyby over the US flag. Nicely shot, assuming it’s not photoshopped.

Here’s an observation test for you, btw. Look at that photo on the bottom. If you’re like me, you glanced at the shape of the aircraft, and tentatively ID’d it (after a few seconds of thought, since I don’t do this for a living) as an F-18, then after a few more as pre-Block E.

Or you could be smart and notice the rather clear “US NAVY” painted on the underside of the wings… which I missed for at least 10 seconds.
-wolfe

 
Comment by Billy
2006-11-17 15:51:25

Prehaps you’re being a bit hard on tomales here!

 
Comment by diamatik
2006-11-17 14:58:44

FEMALESAREEQUALTOMALES,

Thank you for your insightful views. I agree that females are equal tomales. http://www.tomales.com/

 
Comment by FEMALESAREEQUALTOMALES
2006-11-17 14:39:45

you sick chauvenistic misogynistic pig. I hope you burn in hell.

 
Comment by Female
2006-11-17 13:41:16

Dutch269 said:

Female said:

In the last 100 years, 160 million people have died in wars and genocides. The vast majority perpetuated by men and most exacerbated by religious conflict. In other words, put the bible down Billy, you’re a terrible preacher and are quoting it to win a point and promote further conflict, not to be a peacemaker.

You know for a fact that women have supported each and every war do you? You might want to reconsider that or are you saying that only men marched in demonstration against the Vietnam war and Iraq?

Wars that women backed up, but couldnt do themselves. Then they fucking complain… so fucking typical.

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-11-17 13:09:16

Actually, what meaning Female is clumsily trying to convey by the use of the written word is that she’d like to fight on behalf of all Australian enlisted servicemen in all of her future wars until such time cometh that she has either reached menopause, and retired, or perished in valiant defence of her nation’s vested foreign policy interests.

Either that or an encrypted call to please disregard her entire rambling post.

Female, ever the mislabeled feminist.

- Flying Steps - Breakin’ It Down (radio)

 
Comment by Dutch269
2006-11-17 13:00:42

Female said:

In the last 100 years, 160 million people have died in wars and genocides. The vast majority perpetuated by men and most exacerbated by religious conflict. In other words, put the bible down Billy, you’re a terrible preacher and are quoting it to win a point and promote further conflict, not to be a peacemaker.

Wars that women backed up, but couldnt do themselves. Then they fucking complain… so fucking typical.

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-11-17 12:38:59

A good Christian only when it tickles your political fancy, aren’t you, Female? You miscreant wallaby, you.

- Grace Jones - La vie en rose

 
Comment by Female
2006-11-17 01:45:07

In the last 100 years, 160 million people have died in wars and genocides. The vast majority perpetuated by men and most exacerbated by religious conflict. In other words, put the bible down Billy, you’re a terrible preacher and are quoting it to win a point and promote further conflict, not to be a peacemaker.

 
Comment by Billy
2006-11-17 00:45:44

son of the suns said:

Does that mean the “base instincts” of humanity will rule over the honorable? Sounds like Femerica 2006.

Modern English Translation says that “no one will repsect anyone.”

Under the Patriarch the old men were very respected and considered wise. But women put the young ignorant ass kissers in power. As long as they are doing what women want they remain in power. See this verse.

4. And I will give children to be their princes, and babes shall rule over them.

 
Comment by abaddon_fff
2006-11-16 23:38:07

-Women deny half of humanity, out of the selfishness that is an inherent part of human nature.-
-Strength and Honor-

 
Comment by son of the suns
2006-11-16 19:38:05

“And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour: the child shall behave himself proudly against the ancient, and the base against the honourable”

Does that mean the “base instincts” of humanity will rule over the honorable? Sounds like Femerica 2006.

 
Comment by Billy
2006-11-16 19:06:29

wolfe said:

Billy said:

Here is an interesting verse to ponder on the subject.

IS 32:5
The vile person shall be no more called liberal, nor the churl said to be bountiful.

Read verse 1 to understand when.

That’s excellent Billy. Most amusing.

Kind regards,
-wolfeIF you’re easily offended by the bible. Skip this Post.
I find the rest of the chapter interesting also. It is in lock step with the spoilt women and how God views them.
v10. Many days and years shall ye be troubled, ye careless women:

Now to really see what God thinks of the spoiled Women who rule
go back to Is. Chapter Is 3
Study that and you find that God don’t appreciate these women ruling.
And will judge harshly for everyone is oppresed for thier sakes.

5 And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour: the child shall behave himself proudly against the ancient, and the base against the honourable.

IS 3:12
12 As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.

This is very deep. Women destroy the ways of thy paths.
They use children to oppress.

Now if you read the last verse in the old testament you will see God is serious about ending the oppression.

Mal 4: 5 Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the LORD:

6. And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the earth with a curse.

Interesting how the old testment ended here on this verse.
He wants to put the children back with thier Fathers.
The way it should be. Elijah will end the oppresion or else.

 
Comment by sandra
2006-11-16 18:42:31

wolfe said:

Now, go over and take a look at my blog at wolfe.mabtw.com if you wish and you can sadly see (if you read closely) that I endorsed Webb. You were right about him! (Or I was).

I’ve a number of Donkeys… err Democrats that read, and I’m sure you’ll find much to entertain.

You can check out this post:
http://wolfe.mabtw.com/2006/11/06/justice/

For comments that even I can no longer quite follow, but that feature men and women talking about women’s rights over the world in an intelligent fashion.

Take care, and please don’t do that again.
-wolfe

when writing that comment, i actually didnt have whoever i was replying to in mind. i was mainly thinking of this one person in particular, very conservative most definately, who always seems to feel the need to remind me that im “going to hell for being a democrat”. sometimes it causes some bitterness.. but i DO know for a fact that not all conservatives are “close-minded”. my friend who i eat lunch with everyday at school is more conservative than i am liberal. but we are able to discuss politics everyday at lunch effectively and without arguing or what not. we have our own opinions, but respect each others’ opinions. oh, and yes i saw them! [your blogs on webb]. under “politics”. i was looking at them last night. well-written and very interesting!
-sandra

 
Comment by Diesel
2006-11-16 16:23:32

I tire of this. Bring me wine and dancing girls.

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-11-16 15:38:30

Billy said:

Here is an interesting verse to ponder on the subject.

IS 32:5
The vile person shall be no more called liberal, nor the churl said to be bountiful.

Read verse 1 to understand when.

That’s excellent Billy. Most amusing.

Kind regards,
-wolfe

 
Comment by son of the suns
2006-11-16 13:06:08

I call them traitors, and when the bucks wake up, massacre will occur.

 
Comment by Billy
2006-11-16 12:47:54

son of the suns said:

P Coderch: Fuck the titanic, every war in history is fought to protect women.

And it’s fucking stupid. I’m telling all of you, I’ve been there, don’t join the military to fight for this way of life, unless you think being a single, childless participator in capitalist mobocracy is the greatest thing ever and worth fighting for.

And chivalry is in our genetic code, but it can be shed like any disease. What do you call a condition that makes you pander and bow to to someone who has declared spiritual and political warfare on you?

We’re men which means our genetic code can be turned on and off when we choose, including chivalry. And until women come back to reality, it’s time to ditch it, for survival.

I Agree.. The big guys are making money while killing the little guys off to balance the sexes(kill off the bucks) and reduce the population.

You could call them a coward or dupes.

 
Comment by son of the suns
2006-11-16 07:19:22

P Coderch: Fuck the titanic, every war in history is fought to protect women.

And it’s fucking stupid. I’m telling all of you, I’ve been there, don’t join the military to fight for this way of life, unless you think being a single, childless participator in capitalist mobocracy is the greatest thing ever and worth fighting for.

And chivalry is in our genetic code, but it can be shed like any disease. What do you call a condition that makes you pander and bow to to someone who has declared spiritual and political warfare on you?

We’re men which means our genetic code can be turned on and off when we choose, including chivalry. And until women come back to reality, it’s time to ditch it, for survival.

 
Comment by P Coderch
2006-11-16 02:24:31

wolfe said:

@Billy heh.

A man who shoots a woman is despicable, unless he was saving his own life (that I doubt). But physiologically this is simple.

-wolfe

[quote/]

What a chivalrous mentality! Too bad women don’t return the favor. In fact, they think it’s perfectly normal and acceptable for men to sacrifice their own lives to save women’s. Look at the Titanic disaster, when practically all the women but none of the men survived, because men gave up their lives so that women could live. This is the reason why boards like this will go nowhere: no matter how much they want to, men will always put women’s interests and lives above their own. Call it biological destiny, if you will. The nature male instinct to protect and priviledge women will ALWAYS backfir at men. Too bad for all of us.

 
Comment by Billy
2006-11-16 00:56:13

Sonyad you are really out there somewhere aren’t you?

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-11-16 00:36:29

Republican, Bush Dubya is thine God and Rush Limbaugh his prophet. Alike in awalness as they are in…

Perhaps the fairness doctrine should be reintroduced to broadcasting? Golly me, what a ridiculous thought.

Republicans never tell any lies or do ill deed. Hâc.

- Carolina Marques - The killers song

 
Comment by Billy
2006-11-15 22:09:05

Here is an interesting verse to ponder on the subject.

IS 32:5
The vile person shall be no more called liberal, nor the churl said to be bountiful.

Read verse 1 to understand when.

 
Comment by one voice
2006-11-15 21:50:07

i knew woman are hard to crack but not that hard lol

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-11-15 19:51:34

Now, go over and take a look at my blog at wolfe.mabtw.com if you wish and you can sadly see (if you read closely) that I endorsed Webb. You were right about him! (Or I was).

I’ve a number of Donkeys… err Democrats that read, and I’m sure you’ll find much to entertain.

You can check out this post:
http://wolfe.mabtw.com/2006/11/06/justice/

For comments that even I can no longer quite follow, but that feature men and women talking about women’s rights over the world in an intelligent fashion.

Take care, and please don’t do that again.
-wolfe

 
Comment by sandra
2006-11-15 19:45:19

wolfe, you are right. what’s sad was that i was even thinking about how it was a bad thing to say WHILE i was typing it. my frustration got the best of me [i'll admit it freely]. but yes, wrong to say. just as bad as saying liberals cant be believers.

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-11-15 19:39:46

Yep. Liberals and Democrats can definitely be believers. No question. They typically are not, but they certainly can be.

However, Sandra, you’re an idiot when you say:

“cant a person believe in God AND be open-minded and accepting”

Jesus wept, woman, can’t you believe that Conservatives and Republicans can be open-minded and accepting? Honestly, that’s very insulting.

You had me until that line.

Then you acted in exactly as close-minded a fashion as that which you were allegedly protesting against. Sad.

-wolfe

 
Comment by sandra
2006-11-15 19:35:53

i hate hearing over and over how liberals/democrats are “godless”. cant a person believe in God AND be open-minded and accepting. guess not to most people…

 
Comment by son of the suns
2006-11-15 19:11:50

wolfe said:

Whitley said:
Who gave you the right to judge anybody? There is only 1 person who can, and one day he will judge you. Get a life and grow up.

You see, this is what amuses me about poseurs. A person of faith — male or female — would capitalize the H in ‘he’.
-wolfe

All liberal Christians are poseurs.

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-11-15 18:33:15

Whitley said:
Who gave you the right to judge anybody? There is only 1 person who can, and one day he will judge you. Get a life and grow up.

You see, this is what amuses me about poseurs. A person of faith — male or female — would capitalize the H in ‘he’.
-wolfe

 
Comment by son of the suns
2006-11-15 17:58:25

Whitley said:

You are very stupid. What makes you think that you are better than anybody? Who gave you the right to judge anybody? There is only 1 person who can, and one day he will judge you. Get a life and grow up.

He works too slowly.

 
Comment by Whitley
2006-11-15 17:37:47

You are very stupid. What makes you think that you are better than anybody? Who gave you the right to judge anybody? There is only 1 person who can, and one day he will judge you. Get a life and grow up.

 
Comment by son of the suns
2006-11-15 17:33:19

Proof of evolution?

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-11-15 15:40:53

@Billy heh.

Women, in general, have higher fat-content throughout much of their bodies, and, consequently organs.

A man who shoots a woman is despicable, unless he was saving his own life (that I doubt). But physiologically this is simple.

The brain contents, as with any organ, differ between men and women, as does that of the skull. Indeed, the greater female intake of calcium suggests a higher capability of density, particularly in the skull-region.

Couple greater density with greater protective fat content and you have an obvious survival mechanism, disturbing though it is.

Let’s refrain from hurting one another.

-wolfe

 
Comment by Billy
2006-11-15 13:53:39

Sonyad, wrong post maybe?

Dazed & Confused - LedZeplin

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-11-15 10:52:09

That really is a miracle. Thank God for it. But it doubtlessly helped that (at least some of ?) the shots came under very narrow angles of incidience to the osseous surface in the respective points where they hit.

Still, how the soft tissue managed to withhold rounds is amasing.

Perhaps the casings weren’t full grain or the powder poor, who knows?

- Cars - Gary Numan

 
Comment by Billy
2006-11-15 10:05:40

You’re so damn right Dick women have a childlike mentality. They always want to keep Santa and the Easter bunny alive. Just like children they refuse to let go of those fantasies. They live in a delusional state of consciousness.

Women seem to think men enjoy arguing with them. But the arguments never have a point of logic. And after a while it becomes annoying to discuss anything with them.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

Close
E-mail It