Women Are All White Power
Writing scientifically why men are better than women are always my favorite articles. In science, there’s no room for emotion. That’s not why women are lousy at science though. Women are shit at science because they have the attention spans and brains of little girls.
When did the myth even start that women act like they do (like bitches) because they’re “more emotional” than men? Does it not take emotion to die for your country and for freedom?
Well I think it fucking does. It takes a hell of a lot more emotion than what it takes to act like a cunt because someone forgot to pick up jam at the store.
Women’s brains are like man brains, but without all the bits inside that make them work properly. Bits like shutting up and think-y before speak-y; those are all missing in a woman’s brain. In order to make up for these deficiencies, women have had to cobble together half-brains out of their existing parts.
That’s where the term half-wit comes from. Women’s brains, their wit if you will, are literally half that of a man — or is it even less than half?
A recent study from the University of California, Irvine has shown that men have 6.5 times the grey matter in their brains that women do, and women have 10 times the amount of white matter in their shit-brains. Guess which matter actually matters?
It’s the grey matter of fucking course.
“In human brains, gray matter represents information processing centers, whereas white matter works to network these processing centers.” -Professor Richard Haier
In layman’s terms, the study means women are all bullshit and no bull. Imagine a fire hose. As men, that’s very easy to do. Now with a man, the hose works properly and puts out the fire. That’s a metaphor for how we use our properly functioning grey matter brains to get the job done. Women, however, take the end of the hose and connect it to the beginning. They spend their entire fucking lives mucking around in their white matter brains, networking bullshit that’s got nothing to do with anything and running around like hens without heads.
Here comes the part which makes science articles such a joy. Here comes the part where emotion has got nothing to do with the hard, cold numbers I’m about to get in the hair of feminism and women and their ridiculous whim of rights and voting and property ownership.
6.5 times the grey matter of men multiplied by 10 times the white matter of women makes men 65 times better than women. It doesn’t get any easier than that.
Why Women Shouldn’t Fucking Vote!
Related Articles:
July 17th, 2006 at 5:18 am - IP Man-Hash: f3026e307ace7
the gray matter for men brains is more evenly distributed throughout where as much of gray matter for womens brains, is located in the frontal lobes.
scientists have long speculated that as we evolve, the frontal lobes will become more active, and we will have access to abilities that was previously witheld from us.
anyway, all i’m doing is presenting hard evidence to the contrary of what is posited about women - just trying to bring some balance and perspective.
i think i found the wrong forum for that.
this forum really is just about hating women.
one of the hallmarks of malignant narcisism is clinging to an assumption regarding one’s surperority even when it’s proven to be false.
for the record, women really piss me off too.
i wish i could meet more women who would do more to alleviate their own frustrations (being fat, stuck in bad relationships etc) than just whine and complain.
i wish i could meet more people in general, who are capable of honesty.
but, men are no better in this respect.
jails are filled with men…
anyway, this has been a fun romp, but it’s time for this little muffy to move on.
have fun, wang cheung…
July 17th, 2006 at 6:29 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
And will also in the future. Yes, I already knew there’s plenty of pseudoscience out there. Although respectable science sometimes starts off that way also. See alchemy, for example. Thank you for reminding me, anyway.
As Wolfe pointed out this is an unwarranted expenditure in man points but heck, I just have to (especially after all that’s been said):
/:)
What might that be? I candidly ask you. Perhaps I don’t know it when I see it.
Again with the victim complex. You know, this routine is getting tiresome. You should really get some new material.
Please stop using such strong and/or meaningful words lightly. You’re admonishing people as mysoginists for no good reason.
This is simply wrong. Also you are forgetting what this site is about. It’s a place for men to share tales of grievances of theirs caused by/due to women, debate the evil that is feminism, ills of society directly caused by feminism, the wisdom (rather lack thereof) getting married too easily especially in western societies, the duplicity, cruelty, deceitfulness and unfaithfulness women can exhibit, the ingratitude of women that label chivalry as sexism yet at the same time complain about it’s absence, so on and so forth, but especially the myriad of ways by which men are better than women as well as the impressive margins by which we are.
July 17th, 2006 at 6:32 am - IP Man-Hash: e7ae5188092ae
The difference in brain composition still results in equal intelligence. http://today.uci.edu/news/release_detail.asp?key=1261
July 17th, 2006 at 7:48 am - IP Man-Hash: f3026e307ace7
actually, a nobel prize winning scientist posited that most people utilize less than ninety percent of their frontal lobes.
it seem to represent a capacity to perform all the executive functions (and i can provide more info on what they are) that we already perform to some extent, on a much grander scale.
one of the executive functions performed by the frontal lobe, or at least represented here, is the capacity to evalute probable future outcomes and consequences of various scenerios that life presents us with, and try to match our behaviors to the best possible outcome, or the decision to avoid the scenerio altogether.
it’s possible that women may be better ’soothsayers’ in that respect, since man logic dictates grey matter deals in abstractions, while white matter is far is completely immersed in the task of helping one region of the brain communicate with the other, and most likely operates in a completely unconscious manner.
my point is that men and women have their strengths and weakness.
and despite our evolution, we have not come up with a way to synergise these these aspects of our sexes that approach the potential of what we can create together.
instead, we’ve made a real mess of things.
July 17th, 2006 at 7:56 am - IP Man-Hash: f3026e307ace7
an addendum,
going back to the fact that women have developed more gray matter in the frontal lobes, and what appears to be an evolutionary advantage, it’s not to say that men can’t do likewise.
who’s to say it won’t be a tortoise and hare story?
in this respect, the hare is way ahead in the game, but the tortoise must may beat the hare to the finish line.
and find a way to accelerate the growth of this tissue in that part of the brain.
there’s a little something in everyone’s brain called the amygdila (sp? pronunciation? something to that effect) that can be easily manipulated by simple visualization techniques.
it fires up the network in the frontal lobes, increases one’s cognitive abilities, and enables metacognition.
July 17th, 2006 at 8:06 am - IP Man-Hash: eadd56da2c7c9
Whatever, Fem.
-Big Al
July 17th, 2006 at 8:08 am - IP Man-Hash: af8f493b67ea8
I think you might mean the amygdalae? We actually have two of these almond shaped structures in the brain and they govern the ability to feel emotions but most importantly they have a connection to the feeling of fear. The amygdalae helps us to react to the presence of danger.
I am not so sure about the comment about the amygdalae being manipulated by visualization techniques as I have never read that anywhere. I also not sure about it enabling metacognition either - if you take metacognition as the definition of ‘thinking about thinking’ then can we assume that since animals have amygdalae they are capable of metacognition? No, I think that the amygdalae is mainly used for the function of a ‘fear response’ - or at least as far as I am aware.
July 17th, 2006 at 8:12 am - IP Man-Hash: f3026e307ace7
sonyad,
“This is simply wrong. Also you are forgetting what this site is about. It’s a place for men to share tales of grievances of theirs caused by/due to women, debate the evil that is feminism, ills of society directly caused by feminism, the wisdom (rather lack thereof) getting married too easily especially in western societies, the duplicity, cruelty, deceitfulness and unfaithfulness women can exhibit, the ingratitude of women that label chivalry as sexism yet at the same time complain about it’s absence, so on and so forth, but especially the myriad of ways by which men are better than women as well as the impressive margins by which we are.”
this is well stated. some women really do want to know what frustrates men.
you did not come by these perceptions of women by accident.
your anger is understable.
but, as often as not, these frustrations lauch liabalous comments about women’s capacity for just about anything - while my comments drew slanderous remarks about being an attenetion whore, having a fat ass, etc.
i admit, i got a little playful with some of my remarks - maybe i shouldn’t - maybe i ‘asked for it’.
this is a man’s sight, and i will try to observe the ‘manrules’ better.
July 17th, 2006 at 8:15 am - IP Man-Hash: f3026e307ace7
big al,
i never saw myself as a ‘feminist’ - if that’s what you’re referring to.
or you could be referring to my sexual preferences - well, i havn’t swung the other way…
or you could be saying that i’m very feminine - in that case, thankyou.
July 17th, 2006 at 8:18 am - IP Man-Hash: f3026e307ace7
luka,
your point on amygdalae is well taken - i’ll come back later on with evidence to support my claim - however the evidence, i admit, may be suspect.
i’ll also provide evidence that supports your claim.
maybe it’s contradictory, or maybe it’s possible to construct a logical bridge between the two views…
July 17th, 2006 at 8:30 am - IP Man-Hash: af8f493b67ea8
Um. I haven’t made a claim. I just stated what I know the amygdalae are. You could look the information up here and here if you like. You only need to look up the term in a medical dictionary to know what it is.
July 17th, 2006 at 11:57 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Astromuffy, the Female Big Al’s referring to is actually someone who could be very obnoxious at times and who unfortunately seems to have went away mad instead of just going away.
Also, I personally disaprove, under any circumstances, of calling women ugly.
Because even when they know for a fact they aren’t, they’re still so fraile and emotionally insecure whilst holding their attractiveness so very dear so as to be liable to take it hard and suffer ridiculously for some silly, malicious stab in the dark that the one who forwarded doesn’t believe his/herself.
Calling a woman ugly is, imo, cruelty. You’re kinda free to call her anything else, provided it’s amply warranted, as long as you don’t imply this. It won’t hurt her nearly as much, if at all.
Also, a nice ass to grab unto for emotional support is an asset not to be petted on lightly.
July 17th, 2006 at 5:32 pm - IP Man-Hash: 04a013be511d0
astromuffy said
this is well stated. some women really do want to know what frustrates men.
–Not too many in my own view. Many are way too concerned with how much a man makes or how he looks than what would be on his mind (one of the things that frustrate us BTW). I find that many woman simply have a very thin facade, which can be pierced if say you lose your job. —
you did not come by these perceptions of women by accident.
–Of course not, many of us have learned from experience. Myself included.—
your anger is understable.
but, as often as not, these frustrations lauch liabalous comments about women’s capacity for just about anything - while my comments drew slanderous remarks about being an attenetion whore, having a fat ass, etc.
–PUHLEASE astromuffy, women have been slandering men for the last three decades if not longer, we have been painted with much broader generalizations than the ones on this site. If I have to watch one more commercial about how a man cannot seem to figure out how to work a fucking car seat, or how about the one that shows how men cannot parent their children without some nag around to help him, I swear I will go absolutely nuts.
Many of us are frustrated for a variety of reasons. My own would be the family court system. I have commented several times on the distinct bias in both family and criminal law and in the media as well. Have you ever noticed that when a man kills his family or his kids the most typical response is “Fry the bastard”? While when a wmoan kills hers (which is also a much more frequent occurance BTW) people start looking for “whats wrong with her”? Look up Andrea Yates, then look at the Scott Peterson trial if you want the proof.
I myself have never really commented on your personal appearance nor your mental state. I find personal attacks to be childish in my view. That said, you fail to see the inherent misandry that is prevalent in western society and your gender as a whole has failed to say anything about it either, seeing as how most women benefit from feminism and misandry I for one am not surprised.—–
i admit, i got a little playful with some of my remarks - maybe i shouldn’t - maybe i ‘asked for it’.
this is a man’s sight, and i will try to observe the ‘manrules’ better.
July 17th, 2006 at 6:06 pm - IP Man-Hash: f3026e307ace7
how do you know i fail to see it? or why do you assume i fail to see it? cut me a little slack - i’m not all women, just one.
July 18th, 2006 at 1:16 am - IP Man-Hash: 55393c7feba51
Well then astromuffy, what do you see? I assume you fail to see it because you are on a mens site, trying to deconstruct the articles made by Mr. Masterson, calling them slanderous attacks upon not only your character but upon wyminkind in general.
I posited that these “remarks” as you have said, have been placed at mens feet for quite some time. Would you like a general review of your sisterhoods accomplishments? However when Men come out and reply with similar remarks(albeit 30 years later) you try to understand why we are “frustrated” or “angry”. Its a pretty simple equasion really I’m amazed that a woman of your intelligence cannot figure it out.
I have an experiment for you astromuffy, if you are so scientific, try going to a feminist site, and pose as a man. Try saying things like ” Men deserve an absolute equal right to their children”. Or Men deserve an equal right in deciding whether or not he wants to be a Father. Or how about, Men should have a say in whether or not he wants his child aborted. See what happens then. Come back with your results.
-Strength and Honor-
July 18th, 2006 at 4:13 pm - IP Man-Hash: 84aa8ec38e490
its strange though women are terrible scientists but for some reason all my highschool science teachers were women, while most of my other techers were men… maybe thats why they all sucked and everything they taught me was completely trivial
July 18th, 2006 at 4:16 pm - IP Man-Hash: f3026e307ace7
kyle,
is it possible that you suck at science, and blame them?
July 18th, 2006 at 4:29 pm - IP Man-Hash: f3026e307ace7
luka,
dug up the info!
Neurologist Paul MacLean, director of the Laboratory of Brain Evolution and Behaviour in Poolesville, Maryland
Function:
* Arousal
* Controls Autonomic Responses Associated with Fear
* Emotional Responses
* Hormonal Secretions
Location:
* The amygdala is an almond shaped mass of nuclei located deep within the temporal lobes, medial to the hypothalamus and adjacent to the hippocampus.
FRONTAL LOBE STIMULATION
In the absence of an emergency, the prefrontal cortex has the capacity to modify the response of the amygdalae. The information coming to the cortex is not raw perception, but has already been infused with emotional meaning by the amygdalae. Although the hypothalamus is the sensory switching station, where it sends visual information to the visual cortex, sounds to the auditory cortex, etc., that information is filtered through the amygdalae before it continues on to its final destination. If the amygdalae sense danger, it immediately activates the brain’s emergency response system, causing us to react even before we consciously know why (by releasing excitatory hormones into the bloodstream, raising our heartbeat, breathing faster and shallower, sweaty palms, etc.), followed by conscious thought (the information being interpreted and analyzed). People who are able to remain calm in an emergency situation and act appropriately without panicking, and in the process save their and other’s lives (or prevent injury to whomever involved), have the ability to also activate their prefrontal cortex with its abilities to analyze, judge, reason, plan, solve problems, make decisions, and control impulses. What a powerful combination: activation of the brain’s emergency response system (to get us ready to fight or flee) and the prefrontal cortex to help us strategize and control dangerous impulses.
July 18th, 2006 at 4:39 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Missis Muffin, what don’t you just outright write what you mean instead of beating around the bush so much? A warning though: it’s monotonous and foreseeable.
There are reasons why most science teachers are women that corroborate the articles in support of this blog’s premise, but I won’t go into them.
July 18th, 2006 at 5:02 pm - IP Man-Hash: f3026e307ace7
sonyad,
i really don’t know what you mean.
i’m not a science teacher, i’m a science buff.
what do you think i’m implying?