Women Are Killing Mankind
Women are killing me.
I mean that figuratively, like when you tell a woman to change the channel from her stupid bullshit and she asks you which remote is for the TV for the fuck-hundredth time.
The TV doesn’t change the channel. The fucking cable box does!
That’s figuratively killing me. Women are also literally killing me.
An article I was given recently says women are ruining the medical profession. I already knew that. Women can barely work a kitchen knife around an overcooked turkey. There’s no fucking way they should be issued a scalpel.
The article was written by a man though, so I gave it a chance. Things made by women are like primary school drawings. They’re not worth fucking anything except to crazy people: women. Things made by men have value. That’s the difference.
The article states that women who take up valuable ass-space in med school (usually too much of it at that), follow up their lackluster educations with lackluster specializations in medicine.
When they do specialise, their top three choices are psychiatry, paediatrics and obstetrics, leaving potential for a shortfall in the more “difficult” specialities the men traditionally choose, including medicine and surgery.
Don’t forget the biggest wasted specialty of them all: motherhood.
I’ll tell you something. If I couldn’t get a new heart because some lady doctor was on her gold-brick maternity leave, I would be pretty upset. It wouldn’t matter though because after women have children, that’s all they care about. That’s because they see for their fat selves how fucking easy it is to baby sit all day.
Thirteen-year-olds do it. Do thirteen-year-olds get to do anything that’s hard? No. Fuck you. Raising children with no job (AKA being a mother) is the easiest job in the world. It’s way easier than psychiatry or obstetrics or whatever the fuck else women piss away the medical education they ripped out of some more deserving male’s hands, so why the fuck is this a fucking surprise?
Look, I’m all for letting women get educations. For example, I think women should be allowed to read. I mean it doesn’t help society obviously because Agatha Christie novels don’t help you read a map to Cluetown or fuck properly and really — well I think we’re on the same page with that.
But what if it’s costing lives? Our lives? Our children’s lives?
This is how the dark ages started. Women started getting educations and eventually weeded all the work ethic out of the entire fucking job force. Thank God killing animals for meat is in men’s DNA. That way we’re not completely fucked.
Women Blowing It (In A Bad Way)
Related Articles:
There was only one individual who created life, and that one individual certainly wasn’t a woman.
Really, what do they teach in reproductive biology nowadays?
”Woman do not create life” = dumbest comment of the year.
Women do not create life. A woman is born with every egg she will ever drop. On the other hand a Man creates billions of new sperm daily. A spermazoid is active and showing signs of life. It hunts down the Lame egg which sits and does nothing, much like most women we know of. The Sperm attaches to this egg and starts to form a new creation. The sperm mulitplies after mixing with the egg and begins the process of life.
now you have the facts.
Men create, women carry and give birth because men are too busy creating everything else. Nature has given one small task to women and they still need help with it..
Push, breath, push, push… breath……..pushhhhh
Most everything we enjoy was created by man.
I gathered you meant that. Considering that creating something means to form something from nothing then that has to be one of the most stupid things that a woman could possibly say. Yet they say it all the time.
A maternal instinct is something that women are programmed with otherwise they would be even worse mothers than they already are. If thats even possible.
I am amazed at how females, mothers, the fucking ‘creators’ of mankind can allow their exitement at going back to work to overide the importance of nurturing their children through childhood and giving them a loving and stable environment.
Yes, you are programmed, that is commonly called, “DNA” and “Genetics”.
Nice try though. Trying to dodge the fact that you were designed to do certain things doesn’t mean you were not designed to do them. Because you “don’t want” and “don’t like” doesn’t mean you are right, it means only that you can talk in the face of design. Easy to argue with a rock and tell it that it is, in your reality, a fluffy cloud. It changes not at all what it really is and does.
I now, in public, take off my hat to you. For once, you said “we” and not “I”, and you DO understand that it is “us” and not only “you”.
THAT is what Feminazi’s lack, the understanding of how it REALLY works.
Now, impress us more by saying, “Thanks great-grandpa for giving women the right to do any or none of the above”.
And to King, I have no kids
My creating I mean giving birth, hence the next sentence.
Also, women aren’t progarammed like some machines, we are born just as males.
A quick exit is not work, work is how we make a living just as you, and some women enjoy their work and are excited to go back while having a family.
While some take on more traditional roles as the stay at home wives
There is, of course, a huge difference between hating women and just hating YOUR dumbass…………I notice you don’t catch that little drift at all.
You are right, I don’t know any of that. Why? A man designed Trojan Magnum XL’s for me to use, so I would not only have to not listen to you, but also that other dudes kids you have……..
Secondly, of course, you know little of what you speak, though speaking a lot means you know little. That was a surprise right there.
I have done all of the above, but not with my kids. Hence, probably why I run like a fucking striped ass ape with the drizzling shits when a woman says, “I want Kids”. That proves to me how stupid she truly is, (A) She WANTS (another surprise) and (B) “Kids” which means she can fuck that up too, kind of like my Mac&Cheese she fucked up last night. Good to know I have a choice in the subject. It is called, “Get the fuck out of my house” and “Don’t worry, some other dumbass will do that with you and pay for it”.
Oh, women do a lot, none of which I consider earth shaking, or more special than me masturbating when it is freezing. Your ability to squeeze out kids means you indeed, are not all that special, since so many women do it, and definitely not more special than every man owning a Dick.
We CAN say it is simple, after all, you forgot that half of making that squalling little shit IS what men are for. Unless you are a Hermaphrodite, in that case, I retract all previous statements and point you in the general direction of your local Health Department, freak.
I am willing to have all kinds of shit that depends on me 24/7, here is a partial list:
Porn
Pron
Pornography
Woman On Woman Porn
My paycheck
My TV and Cool Commercials from Gamespot
Video Games
The World and the Entirety Of Infinity Squared Plus the Known Universe
It all depends on me. Maybe even you, but remember God doesn’t like stupid people………..stupid.
“Chuck Norris doesn’t wear a condom. Everyone knows there is no protection from Chuck Norris”
Women create mankind? Do these women ever think about what the fuck they are saying? The constant display of female dumbness just doesnt astound me any more.
Nurturing a child is what women are programmed to do. Whether its instinctive or hormonal, all female species take care of their young except for the human female who allows herself to be brainwashed by feminism into believing that being a mother just means getting pregnant, giving birth, and beating a quick exit back to what really matters, her career.
I’m sure that the reason that you are able to make such quick judgements is that you have never had children, neither have I granted, which means that I am not going to assume how easy or difficult it is.
Waking up at 1a.m., 2a.m., 3a.m., 4, 5, 6, and whatever other hour of the day, cleaning diapers, vomit, and god knows what other mess babies make, is not a simple job.
Women do not kill mankind, we create it.
And yes, another pregnancy card, mainly because that is a part of what this article relates to that I am aggrivated about.
You can’t simply say women do nothing because you don’t know because you aren’t a woman, am I correct?
Can I say that neuroscience is simple, no I can not, because it isn’t and I do not specialize in it.
When you are willing to have something that depends on you day and night, 24/7, and I do not mean walking a dog several times a day, then Dick will be able to make statements.
I never said I hate women (or that I don’t ‘love’ everyone equally). And I do believe everyone is equal in human dignity. There is no catholic doctrine that everyone is ‘equal’. I assume by ‘equal’ you mean equally capable? If not, correct me.
As far as turning the other cheek, I’m not sure what that has to do with it. I mentioned a harmless joke in the workplace (and certainly not with the hate and vigor the women made their comments with). I had assumed (wrongly) that a little playfulness couldn’t hurt, especially considering their sexist attitudes toward men were not playful in the least.
I am a Roman Catholic but I dont see how you brought that shit about “equality” into the picture. It doesnt matter to me but I have never been a staunch Catholic so meh.
I don’t understand. You’re a Catholic right? Aren’t you meant ot love everyone equal, think no one is better then another and turn the other cheek?
BTW, just to clear one thing up… I wasn’t saying your COMMENT was absurd, I was saying the idea expressed is true, and THAT is absurd. Know what I mean?
Noticed you posted to an old thread, so I’ll give you some company, bro.
First, I find it sad that you and others have to repeat themselves again and again because a few can’t get simple points through their thick fucking heads. I applaud your patience.
Also, your comment about the disparity concerning the acceptance of women being sexist in public and men is absurd. Not long ago, I worked as a tech in an Ophthalmologists office. The only males I worked with were the two doctors… the rest were all women. I am a man and a Roman Catholic, and I cannot even begin to tell you the amount of sexist remarks I had to endure, and the blatant bigotry towards my chosen religion (the women guilty of this were all born again Protestants). Conversely, if I made even a benign joke at the expense of women I’d hear an earful. Not that I gave a shit about what they were saying, same way I don’t give a shit when a dog barks at me from behind a fence. But the fact that they were SO full of shit, and possessed such a double standard infuriated me.
To me, this site is a breath of fresh air. It allows men of like thinking from all different backgrounds and parts of the world to come together and share ideas… and sometimes just to complain about how many women are so incredibly egocentric, petty, and hypocritical.
I am a married man and I love my wife… I truly have no complaints about her… she appreciates me, treats me well, and in return I treat her like a princess. Aside from that, she loves to fuck, and she has the ability to listen to reason, and at times even be rational. She is the only reason I do not think EVERY woman is a lost cause, because I found at least one who isn’t. That said, it is difficult not to become angry with the multitude of vaginas out there who think only of themselves, and seek to spread their double standards everywhere they go.
Hear hear, No we dont hate woman (although there may be one or two lurking around somewhere). I made this point in another thread. Why is it when men complain we get bashed by woman…..you lot do it all the time and at every opportunity you get. I have a very successful relationship with my girlfriend (soon to be wife). One of the things I like is that she understands that equality and equal rites are two different things. Woman are NOT mens equals (and vice versa), basic body chemistry and extra chromosomes see to that. We react and think differently and as hard as you may try to copy us, you are not a man. Why is a woman allowed to be proud of her femininity or mother spirit etc etc, but when a man wants to be a MAN……hes a fucking pig. I dont agree with all that is said on this site, but I appreciate the fact that a place like this exists for men to bitch about woman…since its become socially unacceptable that we do it in public (and who made society that way). Have you noticed something when you hang out with friends that men are more willing to agree to their faults and failings as men (sometimes are even proud of them), but woman vehemently protest their wonderfulness?
Whats more funny is how the site is proven right everyday. Haha.
Sigh. No one, that I know of, though I think we have one occasional bisexual poster who wishes he were gay. If you read more of the site, you’d know that.
Yes, we like our mothers sisters cousins, daughters aunts, etc. No, most of us haven’t been horribly or traumatically dumped. Yes, most of us are getting enough sex, it’s just the insane things that many many women do that are troubling, coupled with a highly feminized society.
There are real problems in this world for both men and women (rape and violence to name two), and most of what a great many women do in response is to run around in circles as though their hair was on fire, screeching maniacally and clamoring for a witch to be burned at the stake.
-wolfe
Esoteric are the ways of the written word.
“In the beginning, there was the Word[...]”
- paul oakenfold - swordfish - 005 - muse - new born
let me ask one question. who all in here is gay? not saying u are im just curious.
im loving the conversations that are taking place so funny.
http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/famq/
Women hardly get anything right unless they know what they’re talking about (which is rare). So sure its smart to listen to a woman explain a site for men.
See there goes my tiny amount of respect for you. An insult.
I thought she was reasonable you know. But just like every other woman on this site.
Well, I apologize. I read a comment made by another female and I believed it. I can’t find the rationale behind the motive of this site, but I guess, I’m never going to understand. Hmmm…
As long as the taking care of doesn’t involve cooking and cleaning at least…
Gabriella, the problem with you (like most women who visit this site) is that you write a great deal but never seem to read. The points and questions you raise have been raised tediously and tendentiously by nearly every woman who stumbles through here on her way to whatever “My little Pony” site she’s actually looking for. Again and again.
The site hates. No it doesn’t. We must hate women. No we don’t. Do we speak like this to mothers/sisters/cousins/aunts/wives/daughters? Not unless it is required. We must be gay. Generally or entirely, no. We can’t get dates. No. It gets dull fast, and only serves to prove the Laws of Women.
Even Female, who is crazy about Astrology for Pandas or something, reads more carefully than you do.
-wolfe
See there goes my tiny amount of respect for you. An insult.
I thought she was reasonable you know. But just like every other woman on this site.
Sots, how much hydroponic weed do you smoke each day? I am serious because you seem to be both overtly hostile and paranoid. Get off the weed before you have a psychotic break with reality and hurt yourself and more than likely, innocent others.
Women give birth and care of mankind. Not kill. If you can’t get a women it makes no sense “bitching” about it. I guess your only doing it to stroke your bruised ego. Figures…
Tegz: females must have their parenting rights taken away. Dick knows it, and the Arabs know it:
The only thing that cements a life of thughood and degeneracy and prison is being raised by a woman. Women will learn to respect and obey when they lose their parasite sources of wealth AND their sources of power(weak government chivalrous half-men giving them custody 99% of the time).
When we adopt the Muslim family system, and they adopt our system of enlightenment and technological living.. there will be balance and peace on Earth.
There is nothing more repugnant than the current system of The West. A symbiotic circle between parasitic females and government sadist-homosexuals. A system where the weak and corrupt backstabbers rule and the strong independant world changing men are pawns and peasants. A rotten structure that must be kicked in and rebuilt by any means achievable.
It’s women like Happy & Sucessful which will and are killing mankind.
Angry Scientist said “That last is living in a dream world where intelligence is only what you recognize as intelligent.”
Dolphins and primates are intelligent.. but they don’t have voting rights and a free leech ride on masculine government systems or directly attatched to a male host.
Last I checked, modern women act more like primate females than they do the females of sentiant species. You are a useful idiot, and should study the science of “I’m a cuckold I should blow my brains out.”
tegz: The solution is destruction of the welfare system and to let women fend for themselves. See how Happy and Successful they are without us to “abuse” them. Only when the trash of the planet and their bastards are starving.. will they know their rightful place and come back obediantly begging for a place at the bottom of the power order.
Happy and Successful: Just because every man you’ve ever been with didn’t like the idea of you fucking other men.. it doesn’t mean he’s jealous.. it just means you’re a fucking whore. You pea-brained yeast infected twat.
jack2..womyns world is not fucked…yet.
Men know what is needed -and in- fighting on ’special cases ‘are wasting energy..(like men fighting each other- see earlier).
In earlier days a good war would have brought reality to the front door. Unfortunately, the materialist construct of ‘wants’, advertising and soft social options have jiggered the equation badly.
Nuclear threats have made that trad. option untenable (good)
IE: Fem world on the backs of deluded men…hence mens’ anger here,there and everywhere ! Me too- I add.
Solutions are needed..Please concentrate, guys!
Woman. I was wrong. You’ve grievous problems of the neuropsychiatric/endocrinologic variety.
Seek help.
Please.
- Prodigy - You will be under my wheels
What underage neighbourhood girl did you rape to produce your pathetic creep of a son?
Why does your fucking stupid son give a fuck? Another simple-minded jealous type?
Typical. Shit never falls far from the Fucking Shit Tree. :P
You’re a perverted, stupid, sick dangerous idiot. No wonder your mother wished you were never born.
Seriously? You’re a fucking idiot. Do some research. The dark ages weren’t caused by that.
Angry Scientist,
Females sexually incentivize boys towards violent competition and sexually punish/shame/humiliate those who don’t compete/fight “like a man”. This is because women are sexually aroused by violence and power (blood/cock/power/money lust). She picks the alpha males of these competitions, and together they go on to rule over and oppress men as a whole.
When violence or rape is committed against women, they get pissed because they are finally getting a taste of their own medicine - the bad boy was supposed to bully/hurt/kill/rape other men - not princess.
My son is in med school at this moment. He says a full 50% of women students aren’t practicing full-time within 5 years after receiving their certificates, Not only does this cause a shortage of specialists, but in many places if you can find a doctor at all who will take new patients, but if you can, it takes a week to get in. I get better medical care here in the Third World part of Mexico, seriously.
He has been told they are starting 7 new med schools in the US next year, to try to get enough graduates to make a stab at supplying med care even with at least a 50% wastage.
Need I say if all med students were male,, there would be no shortage???
What the world needs is more manginas…
NOt!
blindness.. .
that is what I think this scientist should be working against.
Angry Scientist said:
Abaddon-fff said:
Also I find violence against HUMANS to be regressive and a waste of energy, it disgusts me that violence against Men is found to be acceptable or at least you infer that by leaving men out of your equasion.-
No, I’m inferring that is a different issue.
-How is it different? Because we are Men? How does that make things any different? Men commit violence torwards other Men, Men commit violence torwards women, women commit violence torwards other women and women commit violence torwards Men. Do you see the constant in the equasion genius?-
An issue between nations or belief systems or gangs or involving the criminal element, as well as internal. I think the reasons men fight are substantially different from reasons men beat up women.
-Right here is where I directly engage your complete and utter hypocrisy on the subject AS. I will add that you only need one more S to complete the word that you’re making of yourself right now.
Once again, you (like many chivalristic assholes w/ an education) leave WOMEN completely out of the equasion. They musn’t commit violence against themselves and other women, because they’re women right? Its complete HYPOCRISY to do so.-
I do agree it’s all a waste of energy. I’m only going to correct the most egregious misrepresentations of myself or my language for now. I’m new at blogging and posting on the web, have little time for it, so I won’t be able to make as much noise as I’d like. Not surprised nobody engages any of the issues I raise, except to dismiss them as the ravings of a nutcase, fruit, feminist fanatic.
-I don’t think that you’re a fanatic, fruit, or nut, just mistaken in the belief that women don’t commit violence against other people. I think that you’re a hypocrite as well for not denouncing feminist websites for their blatant misandry and lies. I seriously doubt I have “misrepresented” you in any way, simply pointed out serious flaws in your thinking which you have yet to correct or even acknowledge.-
I am surprised at all the quotes you bothered to post. I wish you guys would think on how your rhetoric might encourage the monsters you denounce.
-As their rhetoric encourages us, except its federally funded and taught in every major university in this country and others. I don’t see you out there “fighting the good fight” against them now do I?
By the way, I agree my blog rules would be evil in a government, but I am only trying to keep my own blog under some degree of control, in case I encounter madmen throwing around death threats or the like. Some feminist bloggers have. You guys at least think your ravings about stupid, evil women are rational. The problem is, so do the madmen. However, I specifically have exempted several posts from my rules, including the most recent ones in which I challenge the basic premise of male behavior and of this blog, because I invite debate, even if I don’t think it is intelligent, when I directly challenge. Why would you think my process of shredding is irrational? Oh that’s right, you think reason has escaped me, enchanted out of me by those evil feminists whose intelligence is an oxymoron? That last is living in a dream world where intelligence is only what you recognize as intelligent.
-Like I said before, I have never stated, nor inferred that you’re irrational or living in a fantasy world. Simply a hypocrite and thats all. You have yet to anwser several of my questions from the previous post.-
-Strength and Honor-
apparently you study the science of bullshit.
go do something productive like …suicide.
Classy. And on Veteran’s Day, too. You are an exemplar of feminism, madam.
-wolfe
Thank you Angry Scientist for saying that stuff :) x
“That last is living in a dream world where intelligence is only what you recognize as intelligent. ”
???
i like this page because i will be glad when all men are gone after women have killed them all it will be so much better
Abaddon-fff said:
Also I find violence against HUMANS to be regressive and a waste of energy, it disgusts me that violence against Men is found to be acceptable or at least you infer that by leaving men out of your equasion.-
No, I’m inferring that is a different issue. An issue between nations or belief systems or gangs or involving the criminal element, as well as internal. I think the reasons men fight are substantially different from reasons men beat up women. I do agree it’s all a waste of energy. I’m only going to correct the most egregious misrepresentations of myself or my language for now. I’m new at blogging and posting on the web, have little time for it, so I won’t be able to make as much noise as I’d like. Not surprised nobody engages any of the issues I raise, except to dismiss them as the ravings of a nutcase, fruit, feminist fanatic. I am surprised at all the quotes you bothered to post. I wish you guys would think on how your rhetoric might encourage the monsters you denounce.
By the way, I agree my blog rules would be evil in a government, but I am only trying to keep my own blog under some degree of control, in case I encounter madmen throwing around death threats or the like. Some feminist bloggers have. You guys at least think your ravings about stupid, evil women are rational. The problem is, so do the madmen. However, I specifically have exempted several posts from my rules, including the most recent ones in which I challenge the basic premise of male behavior and of this blog, because I invite debate, even if I don’t think it is intelligent, when I directly challenge. Why would you think my process of shredding is irrational? Oh that’s right, you think reason has escaped me, enchanted out of me by those evil feminists whose intelligence is an oxymoron? That last is living in a dream world where intelligence is only what you recognize as intelligent.
Angry Scientist said:
So expressing an opinion is trolling for traffic, advertising for my blog, hmm? Maybe I don’t get blog etiquette.
-Obviously you don’t, its pretty simple though. A scientist (such as yourself) should have figured this out by now.
Classic chivalry. I might have known.
-Its much better than the law of the jungle, or the law of tooth and nail.-
At least you guys find physical violence against women and children reprehensible.
-I don’t, I view violence as a natural expression of survival actually. Many animals are violent. Humans have just figured out that natural systems such as violence aren’t workable within human societies. Also I find violence against HUMANS to be regressive and a waste of energy, it disgusts me that violence against Men is found to be acceptable or at least you infer that by leaving men out of your equasion.-
I am here to challenge what I see as faulty reasoning. I am a revolutionary, a scientific heretic.
-What exactly are you challenging? That Men aren’t better than women? You should provide some kind of proof or evidence or even something to back that up if such is the case.-
I think women don’t need or want your kind of protection. It’s insulting their intellligence, but you seem perfectly happy to do that blatantly. I find that illogical in the extreme, and straight out denial of reality. But you can have your own opinion; I know better than to expect to change anyone’s mind.
-Women don’t need our protection, because we have built a system to protect them. Saying intelligence and woman in the same sentence is an oxymoron to say the least. -
-Strength and Honor-
Of course you do. You’re a man.
-Dick
So expressing an opinion is trolling for traffic, advertising for my blog, hmm? Maybe I don’t get blog etiquette. Public website, I agree, was a misnomer. I meant open to the public, which is not the same. Some bulletin boards, for instance, require approval to post or even to read. Are you implying this blog requires permission to repost quotes?
Classic chivalry. I might have known. At least you guys find physical violence against women and children reprehensible. I have not read much of this blog, and certainly was not quoting anyone. Paraphrasing what was posted on another blog I won’t name. I had no idea this blog existed. I am here to challenge what I see as faulty reasoning. I am a revolutionary, a scientific heretic. You may call that, nut case. I was expecting someone to throw around that word, fruit, or an equivalent. You don’t read enough to know I am straight, that is your problem. Maybe I should have said it up front, but some things are so clear to me, they seem obvious. Another thing like that, in my posts I was writing about variations on a general attitude, not necessarily this blog in particular.
I think women don’t need or want your kind of protection. It’s insulting their intellligence, but you seem perfectly happy to do that blatantly. I find that illogical in the extreme, and straight out denial of reality. But you can have your own opinion; I know better than to expect to change anyone’s mind.
Indeed, my phrasing is somewhat inadequate.
The blog’s author is a self stated atheist.
A charming excerpt:
Yes, truly a charming fruit and nut case.
Regarding the proxying, I meant through Google as well.
I am sorry to say so but your off interpretation of my comment portrays a somewhat and, I believe unwarranted, suspicious attitude towards me.
As a matter of fact, I’m listening to sincere yet hysterical eerie ramblings on the phone right now, as I write. On religion, of all things.
Regards.
Oh, dear. I was referring about what I read on that blog there. I thought that much would be clear.
Angry Scientist’s.
Another thing is that a post that is begun before the other might appear after the latter because it takes longer to write. Time during which the author, me - for example, doesn’t see what anyone else is writing.
Sony. I assume all your posts are directed at me since, well, you address the first with “Wolfe,” (and leave the others as continuations aimed at someone).
Yes of course I can proxy. Google cache is far more anonymous though, if we assume that google is independent.
I believe in God. I’m a Christian. I’m really not sure what you’re getting at here. I don’t believe in the existence of God? Indeed, I’ve gone to pains to stress otherwise, even at the risk of my credibility.
I’m not remotely angry at God. I’m baffled as to why you’d think so.
I believe in God.
I respect the views of others and recognize that this is something that neither they nor I can prove.
There is something happening in your life, and it’s nothing to do with this website, methinks.
Hope all works out for you. I believe what I believe, and I respect the rights of others to believe as they believe. I recognize it’s impossible to “prove” most matters of faith, so, well, I don’t try.
-wolfe
Or was it media attention that the formerly obscure mister Lasee was aiming for? Either way, I’m sure he’s having plenty of success.
Ooops. Here we go again.
You did have a few posts from under another ip.
Thank you. Come next break I’ll be looking for something on the side again.
Wolfe, you don’t need to use the Google cache. That may be outdated. You can proxy.
Unsurprisingly, the latest blog entry (When Misogynist Violence Makes Headlines, part 2) seems to do with the recent school shootings and how the media supposedly intentionally obfuscates what matters, that this was somehow a really clear and undeniable validation of the holy axiomatical tenets of feminism and the evil nature of men.
It seems like everyone’s trying to pull some opportunistic propaganda bullshit off of those awful and sad occurrences. From mister Lasee with his insane proposal to garner NRA fancy to feminists screaming msiogyny in the hopes of rescuing a cause long lost, dead and putrid.
A self-stated atheist, unsurprisingly. Socialists and God seem to have so little in common, beats me why that’s so. I’ve no problem reconciling being somewhat of an idealistic dreamer pinko leftist with believing in God.
Then again, why would you be angry at a God that, as far as you’re concerned doesn’t exist, WERE He to exist? Yet another intriguing paradoxical characteristic fundamental to feminist thought - I employ the term loosely, dogma would be more appropriate. Didn’t Dick say something about women and making up one’s mind, how the two sets are totally removed?
Politicians, whatever their party affiliations or leanings, are usually as well far removed from the God of Abraham and Moses. At least in my view. Only they’ll obviously prefer to fervently state the contrary, even if it means lying through their teeth and gums. Socialist political leaders are obviously exempt apriori from any religious belief whatsoever apart from what the little red carnet imposes.
Politicians are tainted on arrival. Because you can’t really get into the little circle of joy unless you’re already playing along, now can you? How can you possibly muster any votes if you say the truth? Especially if it’s religious beliefs that you’re lying about to your intended electorate.
Just look what big pile of poo the Hun’s Prime Minister just for doing his job.
Now and then, aye. Surprisingly, mostly using IP tunneling tho. The counter reset is cuz I changed my email addy. And glad you aren’t offended by my use of your name. Only respect was intended (seriously).
BTW sorry to hear of what occurred on your blog. Sucks. I shall blog sometime about female managers.
Respect,
-wolfe
Wolfe. Glad to see you up at these hours. Noticed a new ip as well. Are you away from home(Canada/US) again?
Again from google’s cache of your blog, good sir:
K… so an argument you judge as intelligent will result in irrational (?) ’shredding’, one that you judge as unintelligent will result in banning.
Don’t you grasp how stupid and evil a policy this is?
My own blogs policy is this: Be polite.
That’s it.
I don’t care what your ideas are, simply be polite to fellow posters, society, and me, and that’s great.
If your ideas are logical, I’ll say so; if they aren’t, I’ll say so as well. If they’re somewhere in the middle, I’ll consider them.
You’re clearly a religious man; a fanatic. Your religion happens to be Feminism. Any who violate its Holy “Feminist Principles”, even intelligently, deserves “shredding”.
Wow. Pretty evil. Pretty anti-freedom of thought and speech.
You’ve a right to do so. Doesn’t make it right.
-wolfe
Angry ‘Scientist’, this site does not exist to give your blog traffic. I know that may be a surprise to you.
You’ve burst into a discussion on mirrors with an ad for your blog. Fair enough, perhaps you are unfamiliar with etiquette.
I glanced at your blog via google’s cache (I’d rather not give you a hint of my IP). From it:
Wha? Look, even Sony, when he has had 26 pints, has been hit on the head with a sledgehammer, and has fought off four mountain lions, and is speaking about guns, doesn’t demonstrate this level of… zaniness. Thatcher was never accused of fearing to challenge or rock the boat. Pathetic. I must speculate you know nothing of Britain or recent history, ‘Scientist’.
(And respect for my friend Sony, much though I disagree with him. Apologies for using him in this example.)
Some would call that trolling. And, believe me, no regular poster here is sadistic. (Yes, yes, I know you were trolling elsewhere for traffic). I and we decry violence against women as an abomination. It is precisely because women are weak that a good man defends women — even evil and stupid women — from the consequences of their actions. Women are to be protected, loved and cherished. Men are better than women. There is nothing contradictory in those two sentences.
This website thinks women are “not as capable” in some measurable, objective ways. (You can debate those ways if you wish.) It is for precisely that reason that they must be defended. Your view is so counter-rational that I must really doubt your background in ’science’, unless it is one of the voodoo sciences (e.g. psychology, social work, etc.)
WTF is a “public website”? This certainly isn’t one, or are you that ignorant? Your home is probably open to public view, unless you’re one of those nifty liberals that proscribes one law for the rest of us and one for you. Does that mean your home is public? May I wander in and drink your wine-cellar dry? This website is open to public view, but that does not make it a “public website”.
Sloppy thinking, sir.
If you quote me, have the decency and balls to quote this entire statement that follows.
To be sure, third wave feminism may, at times, increase the probability by its extreme reactionary nature. But a man who batters women is contemptible. The blame for his behavior is upon him. Not upon “society”, not upon “feminism” and not upon some mystically magically powerful website.
He is wrong. He is to be condemned.
So too are the women who beat boys, who sexually abuse boys.
Surely you can agree with that? Or can you? If you can’t, further discussions will result in me repeating that question to you.
-wolfe
Hey, guys, assuming your nonsensical tortured logic is not meant as a spoof, you sure sound like a bunch of sore losers. Throwing that word sexist around as though you have some clue what it means. In response to those recent incidents of men invading schools to rape and murder girls, I wrote some things on my blog about arrogant self-righteous pathetic woman-hating asses like you. For a sample, one paragraph goes like this:
It’s a male bonding ritual to put women down, which may seem harmless to men. To some extent this is whining, men feeling inadequate or resentful in the face of women not acting according to male fantasy plans. This is what these guys call women castrating them. Disillusionment is part of growing up, guys. So is rejection, disappointment, having to face personal demons and other aspects of reality, taking responsibility for your life, actions, beliefs. So convenient to blame your woes on women, or feminism. You know nothing about either besides your tinted impressions of how women react to you.
So guys, flame away, or if you have the nerve, come over to my blog and help me expose your inane twisted fallacies. Fair warning, I am a male scientist. I know logic, and male tricks masquerading as logic, like the back of my hand.
I’m not sure how much credit on this one Greece deserves, for certainly the Chinese (at least as far back as 2000 BC) used bronze mirrors, and so, it seems, did the Israelites: