Women Are The Special Olympics
If there’s one thing you learn after dealing with the mentally handicapped for an extended period of time, it’s that they all want one thing: to be treated equally.
Also graham crackers.
Women are a lot like the mentally handicapped in that way. The only difference is women don’t deserve it — equality or graham crackers.
History is filled with examples of disabled men overcoming obstacles and taking care of business in a manly fashion. Several presidents have been handicapped. Also that guy from Goonies, I’m pretty sure he was retarded. One thing, however, remains the same. No matter how many chromosomes a man is born with, he wants the playing field even. Fairness is unto manliness. He also wants to be treated the same as everyone else.
What a surprise that a woman invented the Special Olympics.
The Special Olympics is for the mentally handicapped what a Chinese lady with an umbrella is for me. It’s something I do not fucking want around. Chinese ladies will stab your goddamn eyeballs out with those things. The Chinese character for ‘opportunity’ is the same as ‘crisis’, and I’m willing to bet that’s not the only Chinese character with a Chinese double meaning. ‘Umbrella’ in Chinese is probably the same as ‘eyeball toothpick wheel’. That’s why the Chinese don’t like baby girls. Their women can’t even carry umbrellas correctly, their little girls must be fucking nightmares.
One time while I was watching the Special Olympics, I saw a retarded weight lifter throw up about two gallons of orange juice. It was so hilarious I still think about that image at least once a week a decade later. Does that sound like the kind of thing the mentally handicapped need?
No. It’s humiliating. The mentally handicapped need training for minimum wage jobs and volunteers to help them keep their shit together. They don’t need committees planning fucking parades and testing them for steroids just so they can go out and throw up a cubic foot of orange juice on national television. You can’t not laugh at that no matter who you are. Jesus would have laughed at that.
Women need national recognition for their accomplishments; physical, emotional, or otherwise. Men don’t; whether we’re mentally handicapped or not. Let’s say a woman married a millionaire with no penis. Well that’s the greatest accomplishment a woman can achieve. You bet your ass she’s going to want a parade.
When a woman hits the gym for two weeks in a row, she needs an Olympic sized parade in her honor. That’s why women have such a hard-on for the Special Olympics. They think accomplishments aren’t accomplishments until they’re shoved down everyone’s fucking throat.
I respect the shit out of retarded athletes. But that’s where it ends. I don’t print the sentiment on a bumper sticker and then tackily adhere it to the chrome backside of a fifty thousand dollar SUV some man paid for. That would make me a woman instead of a different gender which brims with class and discretion. That gender is The Man.
I respect retarded athletes so much that I laugh my ass off when they vomit two gallons of orange juice all over the place.
Now this is a true story. Many years ago I was with a friend in a bowling alley who was not only too drunk to bowl, but he was also too drunk to not have passed out on the floor of the bathroom. When I found him like that, I did what any man would do. I kicked him in the stomach. Whether you’re mentally handicapped or too drunk to not get kicked in the stomach, it’s hilarious when you throw up. The only difference is, Drunk Guy Olympics wouldn’t make women feel like they’ve done something with their lives.
They haven’t.
Did you know the Special Olympics is the only organization legally allowed to use ‘Olympics’ in its title? That’s true. It’s just like how women are the only other species legally allowed to use ‘man’ in their name. Except for Manatees, which are a fat and slothful creature for which nature has only one equal: women.
Coincidence?
Related Articles:
how’s about a big bag of “fuck off!” for the olympics? 3000 hours of crap that preempts shows I want to watch. “and the gold medal for Turdburgling goes to Harry Bush of Dumbfvckistan!”.
http://www.menweb.org/omwv1n2.htm
“Actually, Marc Lepine, who murdered 14 female engineering students at Montreal’s École Polytechnique, wasn’t trying to kill women. He was trying to kill feminists. Before he opened fire, he said to the female engineering students, “You’re all feminists. I hate feminists!� And in his suicide note, Lepine wrote, “Feminists have wrecked my life.� “
Hey Femicuntwhorehookerbitchs how about I shove chainsaw’s up your hole to save MANkind, for more entertaining. Your only worth comes from spreading your legs for our pleasure and for propagating!
Your thoughts and opinions are useless you and your gender will be made to suffer for crimes against men for thousands of years to come!
I have never posted to this site but have read a lot of them. First I will start off by saying, you will never read one of my posts at a feminist site. why? you might ask. well because I am a guy, and I am not gay. wich proves I have the ability to reason, feminist dont want to hear from men on their site, so why the fuck do you ( female), post here, for, in which I can almost guarantee Dick, ie. man genius, absolutly crings reading you vile vomit words. secondly The special olympics, only exploits, the unabled, for commercial gain. no other reason. Bitches dont say shit either I know, I have a sibling whom is unable, and turned those greedy corpos down fast than a skinny bitch to a fat poor guy. Oh and if I mis spelt a word or two uh go fuck your self.;
Women are a dispensable tri-hole fuck-bot. That’s it.
Get over yourselves, girls. It’s a buyer’s market= you’re cheap, plentiful- and looking at China more skinny young pussy walking about than served in their restaurants.
Women-
stay slim
Shut-up
smile
look pretty.
shut-up
presuming literacy, master that and we may give you some more privileges.
We’re not holding our breath.
And that’s a bad thing? “Global government” is a euphemism for “put the whole world on welfare and have America pay for it.” Therefore, global government is bullshit.
Yes, we live in everday bullshit government-and it’s everywhere. Somewhere in the alley of thought, in regards to ‘Special Olympics’ and why they exist…you find the grafiti:
“Why does God let bad things happen to good people..err/(cross over) men?”
Yes, God..please. Why? Do you hate me, that you have given me this….lifeform…to share a planet w/ that does everything in the most complicated way except meet or care about my needs and make me happy? Surely, this is torture. It is a joke, at the very least. A sick joke-like spoiled, vicious harpies w/ bumpers stickers that link them to causes they use to promote themselves as nice.
Notice how Jesus was celibate, and on a mission. Alright, who has the backbone to give that up entirely this morning? I think I want mastery of this so bad…I could be ruthless, how’s ’bout you, bro?
So, according to your ‘logic’, the reason the vast majority of single-parents are female is because men, as a whole, are irresponsible scoundrels who have the inclination to evade their parental responsibilities? I think any father reading this would take issue with that accusation!
“No she doesn’t get it,” you freakin’ moron.
The Japanese call this “The Talking Dog”.
A dog comes up to you and speaks to you with perfect grammar, syntax and logical consistency. You are completely amazed, of course. But what you are amazed at is not the content and sentence construction, but that the dog speaks at all!
Ditto
I am so going to plagiarise those statements. It has been an hour since I first read that and I still cannot stop laughing.
Glad to see you posting, lurker.
I always like to say a woman who demonstrates an understanding of anything is like stumbling upon an Everlasting Gobstopper from the classic Willy Wonka movie. Yea, it lasts forever, but who wants to suck on a jack?
Also, it lasts forever. Let’s get a new flavor up in here.
-Dick
When Bush speaks I sense that he believes nothing he says and is being blackmailed for something.
Damn, of COURSE he is! Read about Skull and Bones, and how new initiates have to masturbate in a coffin while relating their former sexual experiences.
It’s not an exaggeration to say that everyone in DC has some dirt on them, something that would be devastating to their families and would mean their ruination, and the FBI has it well documented. And so does Mossad, and every other intelligence agency.
The Bush family is one of the the dirtiest families in American politics and certainly the most unscrupulous. With the single exception of family loyalty, they have no loyalty whatsoever, particularly to the electorate. Just blackmailing stockholders who make large donations (read “bribes”).
(/rant) Please pick up the thread where you left off.
dick,
long time lurker, first time poster. i love this site. i generally enjoy your articles more than the comments that follow them although there are usually at least of few nuggets of gold to be found therein.
i come here every once in a while and catch up on all the new articles. this site is like a super-manly hemorrhoid cream that soothes itching with humour while it reduces swelling with a healthy dose of reason.
in any event, i de-cloak today to simply to say that from what i read of DrZ comments, I neither understand nor condone the attacks on her. having said that, i do not know anything about her nor the history of her posts. i do know this though: finding a woman who demonstrates even the faintest understanding of honor or reason is like stumbling upon a leprechaun who pisses frosty, cold beer – fucking magic! she should be seen as a gift from God!
i am aware that women are completely mad – it’s just that i will always wish it weren’t so…
Hey, heres an idea, Luka, slut genious (another name for that condition is absent personality disorder): Why don’t you make your own women are better than men site and see how that goes – oh, wait, it would just be another drop in the big barrel of anti-male shit out there.
Let me dumb this down for you:
If there is a huge social movement that places all the blame on a certain group or individuals, there is going to be some form of feedback. In short, all the women are better than men websites, Television stations, radio stations, newspapers, etc. are just spreading lies, and predictably, encouraging more well-earned contempt against stupid little stuck-up prudes like you. And like a lightning bolt charging a cable, that feedback is going to bite you right in the ass if you bury yourself in bullshit and hypocracy. Like, say when you talk about castrating a man and get a little more than you bargained for. I’ll leave it to your imagination – no, I won’t. You’ll get your ass kicked. That’s what happens when you go around acting like you’re better than or even on the same level as people who make a hard-earned living just so that you can sit on your fat ass and eat ice cream while you live on your dead husband’s small fortune. There are starving men and women out there, but hell, out of sight, out of mind, right? I need to get to work right now, but underneath those whore-sacks you know in your heart that you’re in for a rude awakening. Read the writing on the walls – ignore the screaming harpy attracting a very disenchanted croud.
No she dont get it.. She is a woman.
Luka, you seem to have an argument. I like the way you think.
When Bush speaks I sense that he believes nothing he says and is being blackmailed for something.
I’d also wager that a vast majority of the male population are also pawns to this arrangement too.
Understatement billy.
Yep, The president is just a puppet. Bushe is very dumb.
And women are just pawns in the game.
I am solid in this by a theory I read about from Douglas Adams where the President has no power, but to draw attention away from it. Yes its fictional, but why is an idiot like Bush the -president- of America. And he can’t even speak english.
Luka, fuck off my website. Think about that.
No women allowed.
-Dick
We blame politicians too. Most everyone hates them.
We blame women for being so damn naive and selling us men out.
Women are just worthless ingrates and yet they always feel they should be pampered and entitled. They want respect and yet give none. They want.. they want… they want… They give? Misery
Okay…but these politicians are still men…and by definition are supposedly better than women… so if women are only “pawns” why do you heap a load of responsibility of the state of the world on women? If women are indeed manipulated by (male) politicians then who is to blame? Think about it.
It’s the big powerful men that can buy what they want. The hidden hand wants to rule the world through New World order. Women are just pawns in the game and are being used to take power from the common man.
It’s the men that stand in the way of global government.
I’d hardly call politicians “men”.
Eunochs perhaps.
No women allowed.
-Dick
I know what you are getting at, but what i meant about women is they are like a virus. Even the strongest bodybuilder can get sick.
So if men are behind it all, why are you complaining that women have fucked up the world…if men are so powerful and have so much control of the world (more than women) then it follows that if the world is fucking up that is due to the actions of men?
Everyone knows that there is a man behind it -all-. Pulling all the strings.
Its just men doing what hidden hand prefer.
Promoting womens rights and pushing them into the work force is good for the economy because women blow money and keep the cash flowing.
It also brings in more taxes and drops the birth rates.
Because the male politicians are full of corruption and just want to look good in front of everyone so they act on the emotions and expectations drilled into people by things like the bible. Indirectly this is how women have some affect. Not of their own achievments, but other parties
Actually I don’t anymore since Dick replied to my Ask Dick question. Feminism has not changed anything. And I believe him.
Just messing with an on-line translator. I’m not even sure if I said it correctly.
Diamatik, are you messing with my mind or are you just having Big Al over?
That does seem to be your ip and all…
This is just too weird for school!
aerofagie cerebrala
But you don’t seem to understand the contradiction between the assertion that men are “better” and “contribute more” to society and yet they have no power at all over something so “inferior” and a group that doesn’t contribute at all to society (women). It doesn’t add up.
A lot of guys here like pointing out the fact that feminism is the reason for 99% of all society’s ills and yet for all this talk about men “running the show” where is the evidence that men are actually doing that? Why has it taken men so long to change the laws that disadvantage them if they really contribute more to society than women?
If feminism is just a sparkler, why are guys on here claiming it is the sole reason for the future and current decay of all mankind?
Sparklers are showy trash with no potency.
That analogy and current western birth rates don’t match up well.
Yes, a sparkler of death, chaos and destruction. (That was hard to type. I couldn’t stop laughing).
According to Dick, feminism is more like a sparkler really.
Good point.
Feminism is a bomb that must be deactivated, disabled, or destroyed.
Except this bomb doesn’t explode and kill everything near it instantly. It slowly blooms and spreads around the planet giving every patriarichal cultural glory a slow agonizing death. Like a plague.
It’s not that. Almost all of modern society and the laws are based on men fighting in wars and destroying threats for rights. We have built up something strong. And, agreeably, some women have helped. However, most women nowadays are dragging down the world.
Consider it this way. A bomb is about to go off. We have to deactivate it to save the world. This doesn’t mean we are afraid of the bomb, but what will happen if it goes off.
Actually it is the 1% you should be protecting not ignoring.
It is the 1% that could be an example to others. This 1% could be mothers to well adjusted sons and daughters… this number will increase exponentially at each generation, it might be small, but it is better than nothing. The more you encourage and acknowledge that 1% the more likely they will survive and grow. Painting the 1% with the brush of all the others will make them disappear.
Why do men need saving? Do women really have that much power over you?
Actually Z, the fact that you and the other small percentile have honor is meaningless.
We’re trying to achieve power here, and we don’t give a fuck about the 1%. We give a fuck about the 99% of backstabbing traitors.
Your 1% isn’t going to save men from the 99%. We’ll save ourselves. Stay the fuck out of the way.
Z, I know the temptation to respond is almost overwhelming but don’t. Resist, resist. If it kills you, resist.
Okeej. I meant it, women have no logical thought.
Now run along.
What I said was that logic dictates an acknowledgment that not every member of a set will behave in a predicted way every time.
Therefore, saying ‘every time’ or indeed making a statement about an entire group, in this case women, would be illogical. Nearly as illogical prefacing your own statement with a phrase like ‘And of course you’re saying’. If I meant it, I would have said it myself.
And of course you’re saying women being the emotional creatures kill logic everytime they speak.
Scratch through the multiplying layers of hyperbole from both sides on this site, and you’ll find persons of both genders with a sense of honor. Logic dictates an acknowledgment that not every member of a set will behave in a predicted way every time. In emotional discussions, logic is most often the first casualty.
Cheers.
Your findings while welcome, do not refute my original statement. That being, that Men contribute much to the reproductive process IF ALLOWED TO DO SO, and that you recognize that. I am not here to defend your honor (since for the most part women are bereft of it) either, simply to define it for those that have no idea of what it is. Errors or not, it seems to me that you have a sense of Honor or at least “equality”. The “gender war” is and always will be redundant in my view since we are fighting ourselves, and fighting something that is eons in the making. However it does exist and I play my own part within it.
Strength and honor indeed.
So are mine Dr.Z, so are mine. Many women live off of the strength of Men, while never giving their children the Honor system that humanity has used to survive for so long.
-Strength and Honor-
women are like right-wing!
You are getting close to it.
Likewise.
- armin van buuren – shivers
Goodbye, Amefuto M.
- armin van buuren – shivers
I’ll save you all the trouble. Ciao, sony. Twas nice to see you again.
Quite.
Are you outta your fucking mind?
Fuck yes, kill this woman i hate
Fuck yes, kill this woman
Dick can you delete every post by that doctor bitch. She’s a useless cunt and she’s pushing my excellent post from yesterday off the first page. And if the cunt thinks having her mangina “husband” at home raising her kids is ok she’s a lost cunt, because that’s still a mother not being there for her kids. It’s child abuse. And what business does the slut have coming back to this site. Ban her man hash for abusing the man hash. Get rid of her she’s a pest we’d kill if we were running the world. Unfortunately men are onlly running this site. One big man vote to permanently remove that doctor bitch whatever her name is. No one wants her shit, I came to read responses to my excellent well thought out post and was shocked to see her dribble there. Delete it and fuck her off she’s a cunt.
Necroswordsman: I haven’t commented on anything but the facts of my own life. Why those facts make some people so upset is frankly puzzling to me. The personal and profane attacks, calling me a liar, misstating facts I’ve put down in black & white? Hardly seems worth your time. Go after a woman who fits Dick’s profile. I’m not that woman.
Then why let them get in the way of yours?
‘Dr Z, I’m glad you’re an unhappy miserable feminist cunt. And I am glad you will continue to be unfulfilled for years to come. You are a pathetic fake man and we don’t give a fuck if your career requires precision, because what you should have really applied precision to was being a mother that was there for her kids, not dumping them in childcare and then sitting in traffic for hours with a business suit on, you are a total and complete loss..’
Not unhappy at all. Quite happily fulfilled, and very glad I’m not a man by the definition of this website. My children weren’t dumped in childcare, though your only interest in using me as a jumping-off point for your myopic rant disregards the facts of the matter. My HUSBAND was home with my children when they were small. Isn’t that a basic premise here, that men are better than women at raising children as well? Matters not, one way or another. Go on with your ridiculous rant. By all means, don’t let the facts get in the way of your making your point.
Easier said then done.
Kill feminism in the womb of the West and the rest of the world will be saved.
What everyone doesn’t understand is nothing happens by complaining. That’s how sluts get their way. Do something on the ground. Nothing good ever happened without a little bit of man-violence. Man violence is far different from woman violence because everything violent men ever do has a greater purpose, like the walking man-God’s we are.
Thank you. Your unique insight never dawned on me.
For the life of me, I never thought to link the scores of men who precede a baby’s passage with its delivery, obvious though it may be.
Rightfully a double standard.
its a scary fucking thought
You filthy fucking sluts.
That sums it all up doesn’t it?
And we are supposed to feel sorry for women who get breast cancer? Fuck off! You were the ones who didn’t want your cosmetics tested on animals! Now we are testing them on the real animals! and guess what they are carcinogenic and you can fucking rot in hell.
Guys every time you see a woman plastered in her peacock livery cosmetic bullshit, especially Nancy Pelosi, take comfort in the fact that her DNA is slowly being damaged by her pathetic mask of indignity.
Also take heed that the more western women who become infertile the better. So fuck them and give them VD.
Humanity has no future, and purity is extinct. So earn some fucking money and retire early and become a man of leisure, reading and studying the thoughts of the great MEN of golden age of MEN. It is more fulfilling than throwing your life down the toilet that is your average impure western cunt. And dont forget, the parasitic ethos of feminism will sweep 22nd century modernized africa, and the entire developing world soon enough. You might think there are countries with normal natural women in them today, but in decades to come they will want to be the hybrid Nancy Pelosi Paris Hilton, the future woman is a picture of viscious, cum laiden, career woman SHIT. And that’s the fucking truth.
The female vagina, is supposed to be the image of the most pure, pristine, natural, clean, fertile, generating thing in the world. The female vagina is to human beings what the rainforest is to planet earth.
Yet everywhere, the mothers of tomorrow lie under a heaving guy breathing beer breath all over her face as he slides his cock in and out of the mother of tomorrow, having just met her a couple of hours earlier. There are many other men who fond memories of sliding thier cock in and out of this very same mother.
There is no man that wants to see his first born son come into this very world, through a conduit that has also served as the funpark of filth and smut for a dozen or more men.
There is a double standard and rightly so. There is a filthy, gritty, disgusting, shameful, grotty, wrong, and shuddering feeling that overwhelms you when you think about the truth about the average female vagina these days. The average woman is either a practicing slut or a former one. That is men’s only choice.
I’ll fuck a slut don’t get me wrong, but for the mother of my first born son? A filthy slut? NO WAY.
The reason for the double standard?
Women’s sexual organs are the embodiment of generation, they are the source, every single human being in the history of the universe begins thier human experience through the conduit of the vagina. Isn’t that an environment worth keeping pure? and pristine?
If humanity can’t keep the environment that brings him into this world clean, who can makind have a chance of keeping the natural environment clean? The earth is dying yes, but the purity of the vagina died long ago.
In a century when the birthrate drops from every slut feminist cunt wating until they have a couple of months fertility left to have babies, and western nations have a white minority from immirgrants needed to make up the shortfall of manpower, and the immigrants all want to become slut feminist career women selfish cunts as well, then we can truly say not only did fuck the environment, we fucked ourselves too. And as long as the women get to fuck who they like, they will fuck us all in the end.
The penis is not an internal organ. If I hand you a glass of coke is that anything like handing it to you and sticking my fingers in it and stirring it? Women need to fucking smarten up, because no man wants some whore for the mother of thier sons. And no man wants to watch the miracle of birth in a hospital ward, with a voluntary cesarian section, and former slut doped up on morphine, and the selfish cunt still gets bragging rights about the pain of childbirth, when your first born son slides out into the world through a hole that has been used a fun park for a dozen thrill seeking cocks before being subject to IVF treatment?
You are hated more than at any other time in the history of makind, women. Is that not a sign to you? Most men only put up with your shit because it feels good to slide thier cock in and out of your used up impure vulva. They are not considering for a moment that you are a totem of creation, fertility and purity to be cultivated, worshipped and cared for so as to provide a good mother for a family.
No, they are think yeah this whore is a bit of fun, but I’m more concerned about the fact that I have to get a good job, compete against a needless 50% of humans that shouldnt I shouldnt even be competing against to get hired, Im worried about afforing a house that costs 9 years salary compared to 3 years in 1980 because dual income households are the sole reason housing is so expensive, im worried about whether the child is going to have a mother at all considering shed rather be at work pretending to be a man and proving herself for her damaged neurotic ego, im worried about a divorce costing me years of salary and ruining my relationship with my kids, not to mention my psyche, im worried about going to the sunday flea market and seeing two guys knowingly look at me and my family knowing they have had thier cock directly in the hole that my first born son was born out of, im worried about sexual harrasment suits from the women at the office, im worried about, hang on im not worried at all, because im just telling I love you so I can fuck you for a couple of years before moving on to the next clotheshorse cosmetics trowelled cunt I never plan on marrying or allowing to mother my children. That is the reality you filithy whores.
Your first born son is in a childcare center getting raised by 19 year old whores who do childcare all week and then take cock on the weekends, you wife pulls into the car park after work to pick her up, she goes in and collects your first born son who came into the world through a hole that was other men’s thrillride, she thanks the nineteen year old whore and pays her, your wife greets your first born son who she know hates because she has “post natal depression” she greets him speaking with a mouth that has had over a dozen cocks in it too.
You are all fucked.
We are all fucked.
So might as well go and rape, cheat on, and gangbang everyone’s wife because we’ll be done in a century the way we are going.
Good points, Man.
How much precision does it take to bake an apple pie?
-Dick
Dr Z, I’m glad you’re an unhappy miserable feminist cunt. And I am glad you will continue to be unfulfilled for years to come. You are a pathetic fake man and we don’t give a fuck if your career requires precision, because what you should have really applied precision to was being a mother that was there for her kids, not dumping them in childcare and then sitting in traffic for hours with a business suit on, you are a total and complete loss.
Of course she can claim to be multitasking while at work because women rarely do any real work. Affirmative action ensures them of a good job do nothing.
No not really. We rarely just insult anybody who comes here. People like Luka are marginally respected. You just want attention and to look smart.
I’ve noticed that the men on this site are nearly as fond of dictionary.com as the women are of wikipedia. Clever of you to bring forth the rather arcane third definition in light of my career as a cosmologist, though Billy will have no part of that, of course. I am an unusual person, and this site only strengthens my conviction of that; not that I am an unusual woman, as you choose to conclude, but that I am an unusual person. I made no generalizations, I utilized no hyperbole nor profanity, and I made no personal attacks on other posters. And yet, all of the preceding were invoked upon me for simply telling the truth. That makes Dick’s basic assertion a tough sell.
Good post abaddon.

Lets examine the word, anomaly:
In other words, you agree with the core tenets of this wonderful site, but you just believe that you’re the rare exception to the rule.
It’s a rare thing for a woman to tell the truth.
And because of this I can’t what you’ve said as truth. It really don’t sound truthful. The average women is a pathetic parasitic creature with a lying tongue and deceitful in every way.
@abaddon: I appreciate your comments, but I find this entire topic tiresome and redundant. I’ve been an anomaly for years; I did not respond to defend my honor, merely to correct errors. Would that more people who read the comments here were thus concerned with the truth, rather than their skewed versions of it. My honor code, if that is what you choose to label it, is based on a set of values which is currently out of favor, and would be roundly dismissed in this forum. I’ve written about it on wolfe’s blog.
Strength and honor indeed.
Honor doesn’t exist in this society. There are few that even adhere to its basic tenants. Dr. Z, you have acted in (if your story is correct) an equitable manner. Equality in my view is one of the basic tenants of Honor. However, YOU are far from the norm to say the least. Society (and women) in general, has capitulated to Mammon, or greed. Women now trade Fathers and Men in for apartments, welfare checks, and a string of thugs, pretty idiots, or suckers. How sad that this is the highest acheivement for the female gender, to “catch” a Man. Funny thing is that most women fail to see that we all pay for it in the end, but then again, how many women actually HAVE to get a job to survive?
People aren’t born with Honor, it must be instilled within them from an early age. Funny how when Fathers have become unnecessary, we live in a society without Honor as well. How sad it is that Men, for the most part are considered unnecessary, and unworthy to even have contact with their children. How sad indeed that most women are just fine with that. They have no Honor, for even though if I reaped the benefits of procreation, I would have the Honor, to include the other party in such a “contract” instead of making her a debt slave and living off of her labors.
-Strength and Honor-
@jxbx: Go back and read for content. He never had sole custody; we had joint custody and it was my choice to pay child support. His unemployment for several years consisted of staying home to raise our children. That was his choice, and one I supported, until he decided he was no longer interested in doing that and abandoned the marriage. The legal system was minimally involved in our divorce. As for NASA, I can multi-task and dash off a post here and there while holding down a job. Can’t you?
Dr Z, don’t you have a job at NASA to get back to? And while I’ve got your attention I’d like to ask you how an unemployed, cheating husband got sole custody of his children over his faithful, hard-working, professional NASA-employed wife? Just doesn’t make sense to me, espcially when the legal system generally goes out of its way to favour mothers.
I’d forgotten your clairvoyance, SotS. I was thinking of something else. How womanly of me. But, adulterous as he may have been, my ex is still better than me, as he is a man. And it’s not his fault that he showed a lack of honor, it is my fault for choosing badly to begin with. I’d also forgotten how the logic of this website muddles my poor female brain.
Back to other pursuits, like guessing the height of people I’ll never meet. In metres, to make sonyAd happy.
How I guessed that is.
No, Heretic, all “intelligent” upper-middle class women are like that. I have no doubt of the authenticity of her story. Women with capable minds seem to be utterly incapable of picking a mate who isn’t a crackhead/adulterer/thug.
Z: I find the fact that something I said touched you semi-repugnant. And what about our last exchange ended badly? Last I remember all marveled at how “guessed” your ex-husband was tall.
Loss of man points and brain cells.
@diamatik: I said I wasn’t trying to change anyone’s mind. What’s the harm in letting him read my story? Where’s the threat?
@Heretic: It’s of no consequence to me whether you believe what I’ve said or not. Nothing you say or do changes the truth, and I’m content with it. I feel no kinship with anyone who tells lies, regardless of their gender, if that’s what your reference to ’sisterhood’ means.
@SotS: I’m weirdly touched that you remember my story and that you find it pathetic. But let’s drop it, shall we? The last time you and I got entangled in the same thread, it ended very, very badly.
Which most women dont have yet man have it more often.
I invite you to read my article on it :)
Do they? You’re forgetting the golden-rule that women are prone to exaggeration, plagiarism and outright dishonesty when it suits their purpose. Z’s ’story’ is designed to make us men think that we’re deluded and that actually, women have it just as bad, if not worse. I wouldn’t be surprised if every word is an utter falsehood.
And Z, if you were telling the entire truth, which I doubt somehow, I apologize for my lack of trust, but you can blame that on the sisterhood for crying wolf all the time.
I see you people over there at NASA have finally come to your senses and are using metric only.
You might yet be salvageable!
Wrong! He should resist listening to women as much as possible. The last thing he needs is to get his manly mind cluttered with the large quantity of bullshit that is emanated from a woman when she speaks. Why should he risk open his mind to women when 99.95% of what they say is pure nonsense? He is better off missing out on a few smidgens of sense if he can avoid a mountainous mess of miss mumbo-jumbo’s mouthings.
Everyone already knows your pathetic story “Z”.
Of course if “intelligent” women like you can’t fucking choose a mate properly, I can’t wait for NASA to be cut and shitcanned.
Those who live with honour and integrity, both men and women, are rare creatures indeed. It takes courage to do so.
My career requires precision, so I’ll correct your leaps of misapprehension, Billy. I no longer pay alimony, or spousal support, since my ex-spouse now has a paying job. He did not for several years. I did not lose custody, nor did I initiate the divorce. We had joint custody, and I had to travel and live in another state nearly 50% of the time in order to support the children, who I did not want to take out of their school. For this reason, I paid child support, the mortgage on the family home, and for a period of time, the rent on an apartment for my ex-husband. Who, by the way, was the only adulterer in the relationship. I now have physical custody of my children; this is a change which was uncontested by their father.
I find it incredibly interesting that your conclusion is that because I lost custody, then it follows that I was a misfit mother, or an adulteress. Can the same conclusion be assumed for fathers who lose custody? I wouldn’t presume that ~ in my case, their father walked away.
As for judges, decent or not, there was no judge involved. We worked through a mediator and attorneys. I did what I felt was right, and I was never late on a payment. Had we followed the letter of the law, I wouldn’t have paid as much. I’m not trying to change your mind, Billy, but it wouldn’t hurt to open it up a centimetre once in a while.
But Luka, there are so few of them.
You “did pay” as in past tense. Like at christmas you sent gifts?
Women are not labeled dead beats when they fall to pay and most women do fall to pay. And if you lost custody then you were a misfit Mother or got caught screwing around. In many cases those things don’t matter. There are a few judges left with some sense of decency, very few.
I’d rather watch the Special Olympics than any women’s sports. As we all know any good sixteen year old male athlete can beat any woman so why bother watching them.
Maybe we should get all the women’s Olympic sports hived off to the Special Olympics. We won’t have to watch it and Female can. That way everybody’s happy.
I still see women all over just concentrating on trapping men to pay for their lives.
And idiot men falling for it.
Need to educate more men.
Sure, but as far as I’m concerned, no child is my responsibility for as long as I don’t have equal custody. If the mother can prove beyond reasonable doubt that the child is at risk while in the father’s custody then I guess it’s justified that he pay her child-support money – only 50% of the cost of raising a child and not a penny more – but in all other circumstances he shouldn’t have to pay her anything!
Another problem with the child-support system is that the men have no guarantee that the money they’re paying is being spent on the child. As things stand, the mother can spend every penny on buying herself expensive jewellery whilst feeding the child on cat food. Whilst it could be argued that a father has a responsibility towards his child, whether he wanted the child or not, he most certainly does not have a responsibility to fund his ex-partner’s lifestyle. I can understand how men are deeply bitter and resentful at having to fork-over their hard-earned money often knowing that most of it wont be spent on the child.
In a fair system, both parents would share custody of their offspring and neither one would be obliged to pay any money to the other. However, women such as Female would never want to see this because it would mean all the lovely child-support cash would stop rolling in. It’s one of the main avenues women use to steal money from men.
Well tough shit! If you want money in this life, earn it! You shouldn’t try and enrich yourself by taking other peoples’ children away from them.
Now this comment made me smile. Very true Dr. Z.
Nighty night, wallaby.
Sleep late now!
- Timo Maas – Ubik (The Breakz)
I think we are talking at cross purposes here. I am talking about penalising men who shirk responsibilities and you are talking about men being “penalised” who do not wish to shirk their responsibilities.
Here are some facts for you. I really don’t like looking up facts, so I am going out of my way to inform you.
In AU, when the Family Law Act 1975 was created, the provisions relating to Children prescribed ‘the court shall regard the welfare of the child as the paramount consideration’ in custody and access decisions. What was to be taken into account during proceedings was parental responsibilities, status quo, parental conduct and wishes of the children. Interestingly, domestic violence was not a consideration, hence leading to many incorrect decisions were violence against women was hidden, seemingly ignored and therefore sanctioned by the law, and which put women and children at further risk.
In Heidt and Heidt (1976) which was a case over custody, a wife and other people gave evidence about a husband’s violence. The judge gave custody to the mother and access to the husband, and refused to grant the wife an injunction to protect her from the husband. The Judge’s words, “there is no suggestion that Mr Heidt has ever treated his children with the violence with which he treated his wife…in accessing his potential as a custodial parent, I have largely disregarded his behaviour as a husband.”
It was not until 1994 that the court’s started to include spousal violence in it’s consideration of access and custody (unbelievable, but true). If you are not in AU but another country, you may find that a similar history exists in the Family Law within your own country because in this area, the law has only be reformed due to evidence from the social sciences that DV harms children, even when it is not perpetrated against them directly. Witnessing it is just as harmful. Hence, if women are blocking access and not abiding by parental orders, you must ask yourselves why.
The other issue that I see that you have and I concede it is relevant is that lawyers have irresponsibly suggested tactics to clients to help them win custody, such as perhaps taking out an AVO when no risk really existed towards the women or children. This is reprehensible. However, in AU, the law now says that if a false allegation is made and is unable to be unsubstantiated as true by the court, then the alleger has to pay a financial penalty and incur the full legal costs of both parties. This is wrong in my opinion, I think it may lead to people not alleging that abuse has existed, when it has, simply out of a fear of the negative view the court may take on their case if they cannot substantiate such claims.
These issues are complex, there is no doubt about that, but in many, many cases, women block access for valid reasons.
In regard to child support, I disagree with you. Do you not see that if you refuse to pay that you are actually harming your children by not allowing them to have as many opportunities as they otherwise would? Sure, the Child Support Agency may need an overhaul and where women have good jobs and a new partner that also contributes to the children, then perhaps fathers should not have to make payments that are outside their means, but at the end of the day, the children are still his and he should financially contribute to raising them.
Good night.
jxbx, why shouldn’t people with intellectual or physical impairments be allowed to have sporting events? You seem to be suggesting that they would be better of not being able to play sport, regardless of the positive effects this has on physical and emotional health…I find your reasoning to be somewhat conspiracy theory based.
Do you think intellectually and physical impaired people are just puppets without their own wants or needs? If you do think they should be allowed to participate, then you seem to be advocating for an event where there are no spectators watching them or cheering them on. So I guess that means their families and friends shouldn’t be allowed to share their experience with them, and, that the general public also shouldnt be given an opportunity to have their consciousness raised.
Also, the Special Olympics, and the usual Olympics for that matter, wouldn’t even happen without the involvement of an army of volunteers! What this means is that the majority of involved people are not getting paid, let alone lining their pockets.
What’s this, another closing statement? I thought you were done? I’ve made my point, take it however you please. Now if you’ll excuse me I’ve got welfare to collect and complaining to do.
No, men should NOT be blamed for shirking responsibilities in a society where we don’t have the same rights as women. If a man loses custody of his child following a separation, he shouldn’t be expected to pay a damn penny in child-support, and I curse anyone who suggests otherwise! It’s a profound injustice to expect a man to fork-over money to the woman who took his child away and I don’t blame some men for refusing to pay.
Heretic, you are clearly rolling out the typical MRA speil.
Yea, being pregnant, giving birth and raising a child isn’t a responsibility..
And men aren’t the ones that get the blame for unwanted pregnancies my friend, that has always been given to a woman to carry the socially sanctioned shame for both the involved parties, hence, the stigma of abortion, the stigma of being unmarried and pregnant, a stigma that in this country resulted in women being forced to give up their children to the state or church charities pretty much until the early 1970s.
Men should be blamed for shirking any and all responsibilites towards contributing to the raising of children that they were involved in creating. It is not good enough for men to say, well, it’s not my responsibility, she can always have an abortion. Nor is it good enough for men to simply walk away when they find that being a father is encroaching on doing other activities they may prefer to do. These men need to grow up and if they wont, then I have no problem with the law or the state penalising them for not doing so.
jxbx, why shouldn’t people with intellectual or physical impairments be allowed to have sporting events? You seem to be suggesting that they would be better of not being able to play sport, regardless of the positive effects this has on physical and emotional health…I find your reasoning to be somewhat conspiracy theory based.
Do you think intellectually and physical impaired people are just puppets without their own wants or needs? If you do think they should be allowed to participate, then you seem to be advocating for an event where there are no spectators watching them or cheering them on. So I guess that means their families and friends shouldn’t be allowed to share their experience with them, and, that the general public also shouldnt be given an opportunity to have their consciousness raised.
Also, the Special Olympics, and the usual Olympics for that matter, wouldn’t even happen without the involvement of an army of volunteers! What this means is that the majority of involved people are not getting paid, let alone lining their pockets.
Sorry, I forgot to mention that women love that kind of mastubatory garbage most of all. And how do you think stereotypes become stereotypes, anyway? Because you never see them in real life? Believe me, I’ve done more thinking about things like this than I care to admit.
You’re right; “no money here, it’s all been arranged out of the spirit of human kindness.” It warms my heart to see such blissful naivete, it truly does.
And this is mine: I’ve no doubt at all that people get enjoyment from such things. And I’m equally sure that there are many genuine, caring souls who give freely of their time and money to support these events. My point is that they’re misguided. What enjoyment are people taking from these events that they couldn’t find without being paraded for the public to gawk at for a nominal fee? Sounds like the textbook definition of a freak show to me. And just remember, at the end of the day when the medals are handed out and the hands have been shaken, the folks on top sit down and count their money. In the end, money is what it’s all about. Not about helping the less fortunate. Money, nothing more. And that, my friend, is explotation.
All that aside, I can’t think of anything more insulting than being thought of as so weak and helpless that I needed “empowering.”
So, according to your ‘logic’, the reason the vast majority of single-parents are female is because men, as a whole, are irresponsible scoundrels who have the inclination to evade their parental responsibilities? I think any father reading this would take issue with that accusation!
It appears as it’s always men who get the blame for unwanted pregnancies when, in reality, it’s just as much the fault of women. Women have just as much casual, unprotected sex as men. The only difference is that women have the ultimate legal right to decide whether or not to become a parent. If a woman feels as though she can’t deal with the emotional and financial responsibility of motherhood, she can simply have an abortion or go the adoption route. A man, regardless of his economic position or desire to become a father, has no such rights. Even if he seeks sole or joint custody through the court-system, he knows he will lose. It isn’t surprising, given such a basic lack of rights, that a minority of men seek to evade the financial and emotional burden of parenthood. Men have responsibilities, not rights. For women, it’s the other way around.
Your explanation is replete with stereotypes, “aging hippies”, “dewey-eyed young liberals” which is an indication that you haven’t really thought about this. Who exactly are these people that you think are lining their own pockets? And how are they making money when these events simply don’t attract the crowds that others do.
Are you talking about the Sponsors such as Visa? If so, if you have a moral issue with Visa sponsoring Special or Paralympic events, do you also have an issue with them sponsoring the World Cup or Wimbeldon? Because that isn’t exploitation, that’s marketing and it is done in every sport. If anything I think it is great that large companies are willing to sponsor/support such events because believe me, if the crowds are anything to go by, that certainly aren’t making much of a return.
I think your view is very cynical and it ignores much that is positive. Who even cares if some people are only into it for the PR value when you consider that it allows people to do an activity that they get enjoyment out of. I think you know I am right. This is my closing statement.
A little premature, don’t you think? Or were you resting your case?
you are a freak
You cannot answer my question and you have no rebuttal. I have outwitted, outargued and outplayed *curtsey*
It didn’t say “Your comment is in moderation”. It didnt’ say anything! Fuck’s sake is right!
Proof that most people see Paralympic or Special Olympics as having a worthwhile and valid role in influencing social change and tackling destigmatisation, rather than as being exploitative. I’m also still waiting for an answer, in what way are these games exploitative? Who is getting the benefit from having such organisations in existance? Please answer my question.
http://www.paralympic.org/release/Main_Sections_Menu/News/Current_Affa irs/2007_04_02_a.html
Female, when it says, “Your comment is in moderation.” It means your comment is in moderation.
Fuck’s sake.
-Dick
I was inspired at Paralympic events, not Special. Answer this question, if you watched a basketball game played by competitors in wheelchairs, would you be amazed and possibly inspired or do you see such an event as simply exploitative? Do you think the competitors think they are being exploited? If they did, why would they even be competing? These games aren’t held for the spectators, they are held for the competitors and the love of sport. Considering the virtually empty stadiums at the Paralympic Games in 2000, that was sadly obvious. Of course, these games did commence as soon as the Olympic Games finished and they got next to zero publicity, so perhaps people were either all Olympiced out or not aware of them, or..more than likely, people were so high from the partying (which was non-stop) during the Olympic Games that they didn’t feel like bringing themselves back to reality by attending Paralympic Games which would remind them that life isnt all fireworks every night of the week. Unfortunately they missed out on watching the most interesting events. I mean, blind Judo! how interesting is that!
In relation to the Special Olympics is not exploitative, it is a wonderful organisation of volunteers who do a fantastic job that brings joy to many people all over the world. The only reason you could possibly see it as a negative thing is if you are cynical and cannot see what it provides in the life of the competitors. And what does the collective conscience even need salving for?
test
No, you were and are on the wrong track, you see, I was not inspired at Special Olympic events, I was inspired at Paralympic Events, so tell me, does your argument still apply when discussing Paralympics? Are paralympic events exploiting the competitors? Hardly, they have full mental and cognitive capacities, so if the competitors felt they were being exploited, they’d hardly participate in such events would they? In relation to whether Special Olympics are exploitative, that again, simply isn’t true. The Special Olympics is an international volunteer organisation that does wonderful things for people all over the world.
Here, be a volunteer and realise you are wrong.
http://www.specialolympics.com.au/index.php?submenu=Volunteer_Menu&src =gendocs&link=Volunteer_Jobs_Available&category=Volunteer
Well we wouldn’t want that, would we Pot?
Perhaps I did come on a little strong, but only because it’s something I feel strongly about. I’m against any institution that exploits the disadvantaged in order to salve the collective conscience. Your inane babble about “inspiration” and other such warm and fuzzy nonsense tells me I’m on the right track. I’m just calling it as I see it. And show me where I ever said I was kidding about anything.
and SotS, I can be interested in someone’s views, even if I do not espouse them.
@SotS: I am somewhat aware of your anticipation of the downfall of western civilization at the hand of women, and that you advocate the idea that all women are unworthy of respect or basic rights. I do not advocate the inverse as relates to men.
Of course, this is completely my fault for not giving you the benefit of the doubt that you were just kidding and were being inflammatory for no logical reason when you made 3 posts (and the only posts you’ve ever made on this site, mind you) in which you referred to physically and mentally impaired people as freaks. Stupid me.
“You’re” as in us males who populate this site as a whole or myself? I can hardly imagine you have interest in my political views when they consist of you eventually having none.
You’re like a female version of Wolfe.
Go back and read that post again, then look up the word “hyperbole.” Moron.
And yes, I am the zogmama. Or amefuto, to my old friend sonyAD.
SOTS: Not too stealthy, was I? And I’ll not stick around. But I didn’t lie, nor would I. Contrary to your assertions, some women do have an honor code. I do follow some of your conversations with interest, particularly those of a political bent.
And as for,
jxbx said:And in my opinion the Special Olympics IS a freak show. It’s not a showcase of talent.
You are again, wrong. Until you have actually seen any events or athletes, don’t talk about something that you know nothing of because you simply sound ignorant.
You idiot. I called it a “freak” show because they were your own ignorant words. Just because you perceive something as freakish doesn’t mean that other people do.
Wow. Unbe-fucking-lievable. How could I have been so blind for so long? Masterson, I owe you a debt of gratitude. You too, Female, for proving him right beyond a shadow of a doubt.
What exactly is your point because it seems to change from one sentence to the next.
What does winning have to do with anything? It’s the Special Olympics. It’s not about winning.
Yet again, a woman has proven my point.
-Dick
That depends. You cant say that for every one of the competitors who doesn’t come first and you need to decide if the experience of being involved and the people they will meet and the sense of community they will feel will offset any disappointments they may suffer. It isn’t simply about winning for all of the competitors.
That’s the problem.
-Dick
Oh okay, so, you knew crippled people in the past and you thought they were freaks and you freely admit that anyone who competes in the Special Olymics is a freak, as are all the people who are in the audience cheering the competitors on. I see. May I suggest you get yourself along to a Special Olympics event, you may discover that the competition is even fiercer than at the usual Olympics. It’s high drama but of course, if you can’t see past the “freak” show then you wont enjoy it, so just stay home collecting your welfare and complaining about why handicapped people aren’t out getting themselves a job when it should be so easy for them considering society is oh so understanding and accepting of their impairments as you are. Your attitude is what is freakish. Grow up.
So, based on your observations that single mothers raise children more often than single fathers, you have put this down to the single mother having won a court custody dispute? Rather than say, oh I don’t know, perhaps men leave women and their children more often than women do so. Or perhaps the parents were never really together in a relationship to begin with and the child/ren are a product of casual sex, in which case, it appears the man didn’t bother to wear protection and then didn’t bother to stay in distant contact with the woman to see if she did fall pregnant. It is so amazing how men can just think they can get away with “spreading their seed” resulting in progeny but not having to do anything in the way of raising or paying child support for said children..and then they bitch about their taxes having to do so via the state. Tell me, what shall we call these men, arrogant hypocrites or irresponsible fools?
Say hello to Zogmama.
How many single mothers with deadbeat husbands who they pay alimony work at NASA?
Or is zogmama making a stealthy return?
Dick: Saying something isn’t true doesn’t negate the truth. I challenge you to prove that I haven’t been on the site before. As a previous (male) poster stated, men are able to acknowledge that there are exceptions to the generalizations posted on the site. I found that to be a reasoned and mature assertion. Let it stand.
Omnipresent? Or just ubiquitous?
None of that is true.
-Dick
Female you say give examples, game on. Female im certain beyond all doubt of one thing” Very few of the crazy things women say and do, that we men marvel at and post here, are made up. Its not that we are averse to lying, cause that would be a lie in itself that not even a woman would believe. It’s just that you women are so damn GOOD at doing illogical, irrational and insane things over nd over again. Therefore there’s absolutely NO NEED to make anything up about women. If it wasnt witnessed by the poster, then you can be sure some woman, somewhere has done it, will do it, or is planning to do it.
Here’s an example that im certain you’ve seen in real life at least once, if not done it yourself. Woman X marries rich-man-sucker Y. What is MOST LIKELY? 1. The couple will be together forever. X will give Y sex anytime he wants, will rarely bitch, and will agree with whatever he says or does. The are together forever. OR: 2. Woman X becomes bored 5 minutes after the wedding. She knows X has money. An annulment = no cash. X bides her time, pumps out a kid or two (even more cash ultimately), and squeezes every red cent out of Y by using rare sex and daily bitching to manipulate him. After a few years Y divorces X, signs over 3/4 of his net income just to be rid of her, and pays the other 1/4 to her til the day he dies.
Greetings, sonyAD and diamatik. I’ve been on the site before. I’m a NASA employee and my ex-husband was a stay-at-home father before we divorced. I have indeed paid both alimony and child support. It may be uncomfortable, but there’s an exception to strenghten every rule.
My sentiments exactly, Heretic.
FUCKING BULLSHIT!
Wrong… It’s in every respect that they act like children.
Greetings Dr. Z.
That’s not really fair now, is it? The mould likely broke with you.
- Chris Rea – King Of The Beach – The Memory Of A Good Friend(.aac)
You call this professional? The only real professional women are the ones that hang out on corners at night. Women are habitual liars.
“Besides, when was the last time you ever heard of a woman being ordered to pay child-support to her ex-partner? I bet you can’t find a single example.”
I’m the example.
Oh like you have given anything which constitutes proof.
I find it increasingly annoying that women always demand – as though it’s their god given right – to be included in anything that men are doing, such as the Olympics. It reminds me of the spoilt child who moans and wails until it gets a big, fat, dummy shoved in its fat, ugly, undeserving face.
Women are very much like children in this respect. They always want to do what the adults (men) are doing and will throw temper-tantrums if they don’t get their own way. It’s pathetic.
BovineAge35SingleObeseFemale, said “You should keep an open, inquiring and critical mind. If you are unable to criticise your own gender then you are blind and totally biased.”
Yes, because you have always been very critical of your “sisters” in harlotry and state sponsored theft.
Oh wait.. you haven’t scum.
I shouldn’t have to prove it because it’s self-evident. Everyone knows that the vast majority of single-parents are female. I only ever met one male single-parent in my entire life and that was because the mother ran off with another man.
Besides, when was the last time you ever heard of a woman being ordered to pay child-support to her ex-partner? I bet you can’t find a single example.
Wow, you are smart. “I have known crippled people in the past” does not have the same meaning as “I have friends who are crippled,” moron. Again, read that as many times as it takes to sink in. And in my opinion the Special Olympics IS a freak show. It’s not a showcase of talent, it’s base pandering to a social group percieved to be in need of sympathy. It’s insulting, plain and simple.
You rest your case? Really? No evidence, no independent testimony? Just resting that case. My, that’s a waterproof tactic you’ve got there missy. No really, you do the systerhood proud. It’s no wonder you’re the superior species.
ajax, how do you know if Aust is filled with misogynists? To have an opinion on that you would have to live here and if you live here, well, I rest my case. You have already incriminated yourself elsewhere about having “crippled” friends and stating that if they were to compete in the Special Olympics that it would just be a freakshow, ie, you think your “friends” are freaks. How much clearer could you be?
98%?! Prove it. As I assume you are a man, that shouldnt be too hard, should it?
I remember you. You’re the smarmy little cow who tried to put words in my mouth. Like most women you seem to be flighty and emotionally driven, but if by some miracle you remember your last words to me I’d like to state that I have at this juncture no handicapped friends, and at no point did I refer to them as “freaks”. Got that? Feel free to read it as many times as it takes you to understand.
Bollocks. You’re so full of shit I’m surprised you’re not subject to EPA regulations.
If the law is so ‘biased’ against women, how come men lose their children in 98% of cases and are ordered to pay a regular dividend to the woman who took them away? I can’t think of a more obscene injustice than that.
I’m sorry but your lies are grotesque.
Romania – land of the free.
Sonyad, ever heard of a place pronounced Codlier, North of Bucharest? It is on TV as I speak. Seems it is a home for “mentally impaired” girls, one of those gawdawful orphanage legacies of Nicholei the communist. The worker at the institution is busy telling the journalist that the girls only have IQs of 17 except the girls appear to be bilingual and are awfully productive seamstresses in the illegal clothing workshop the centre has set up in the institution. It is awfully quaint just how liberated women are in your country. It is also great to see homeless children living in underground “heating” shafts in the parks in bucharest, busily sniffing glue all day. What else? The show has just said that children are still being abandoned at the same rate as they were during the communist years while your country is apparently receiving millions in foreign aid to support single mothers and children.
Oh sorry, that is all, now we are in Panama, preferred place for North American retirees who cant afford Florida.
You’re quite correct! After all, this is your site and so you have 100% of the authority to determine the content on it, especially since the site doesn’t have a NO WOMEN ALLOWED disclaimer on it. Bravo, Female, let us all talk about what you want us to talk about, oh great
webmastermistress.First, your doing the same thing. Second, I do criticise my own gender. And this:
Women are better than men.
This proves you are a hypocrite and thus.
Do you think his mother would have laughed at that? No. Women are better than men.
The only people I’ve seen on this site talking about male TV presenters being paedophiles, are men. Making up BS about what women do or say and then having a rant about it is almost like watching Mulder and Scully stakeout Area 51. Provide some facts not make believe. And try and give some examples that aren’t extreme outliers.
Regarding the custody issue – you are wrong as per usual. Things are never as bad as some men would want you to believe to suit their own agenda. You should keep an open, inquiring and critical mind. If you are unable to criticise your own gender then you are blind and totally biased.
And how about women never get custody of the child. Oooh wow yeah the law is REALLY biased.
The same fucking feminist excuse. Complain about something else like how all childrens presenters are paedophiles.
I thought it was suitable for it’s intended audience because to read what gets “scientifically” and “statistically” quoted here, it is obvious that the male posters here don’t actually read professional journals.
haha i found this site when i was tryin to search for people who agree with how useless and pitiful women are. there is only one thing they’re useful for and that is sex.
Nothing gives a paper credibility like ugly text on a crappy grey background.
-Dick
btw Dick, bring your articles up to speed, we’re not talking about Special Olympics now, that was last week. This week is about how much BS MRA types spread and how they have successfully lobbied the AU govt to force amendments to Acts which will just cause more heartache to women and children. Make no mistake, ladies and “gentlemen”, Australia is a misogynist’s wonderland.
http://asca.org.au/pdf_public/mediarelease_041014.pdf
The law is biased against women!
Educate yourselves. If you are studying law in AU, make sure you buy this book.
http://www.allenandunwin.com/Shopping/ProductDetails.aspx?ISBN=9781865 087313
I’ll understand when you understand this.
http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/ti157.pdf
Trust Female to attempt to derail a topic she doesnt understand.
Far more informative
http://www.justice.gc.ca/en/ps/pad/reports/2001-FCY-4.html
Great article Dick, but the term ’retard’ seems a bit politically incorrect. You could call them mentally challenged perhaps or autistic.
Mantastic article though. Doubly so because I have an autistic friend, and he’s awesome, I mean, really awesome. Fun loving, likes a good joke, likes to play. More than most women could do.
I certainly don’t have time to read Dicks article because here is something far more enlightening for you MRA types.
http://www.omsys.com/mmcd/courtrev.htm
They might as well go the whole nine and cart in a ferris wheel and side shows. As if the handicapped are put on this earth to “inspire” you and make you feel better about your own shitty life. Only a woman could contrive such a condescending and exploitive concept and think she’s Mother fucking Teresa for doing it.