Women are the Spleen of Civilization
Here’s an interesting scientific thought experiment for you.
Everyone knows that women belong at home and not in the workplace. Just like everyone knows that men are responsible for being the providers in the family unit. That’s why lesbianism doesn’t work and doesn’t exist. It’s like having a car with no steering wheel and a 2 hp engine.
That’s called bumper cars. They sound fun, but really they’re just a waste of your fucking time.
Technology. When it comes to science, it doesn’t get more “science” than technology. That’s a man fact that you can take to your man grave.
Technology’s job is to improve life. That’s why men invented it in the first place. Everyone was having a hard time dragging their shit across the dirt and dying of syphilis at 23, so men invented technology to help with that. Women invented denial for similar purposes, but that hasn’t progressed in ten thousand years — just like women.
Here’s the thought experiment. Over the years, technology has improved life at home equally to how it has improved life in the workplace. You’d think that would lead to lazier employees, but it hasn’t. The truth is today’s modern man-employee has to be just as attentive, productive, and proactive when it comes to learning these new technologies as he ever has; even when not in a technology field, such a crab fishing or being a detective. Technology has not begotten laziness in the workplace, no sir.
But what about in the home?
Businesses are designed to maximize productivity and money. The home is not. The home is more like a crossword puzzle. You sit down, solve a few riddles never straying outside the box, and then you’re free to eat another “healthy breakfast” bar. Have you seen how much fucking sugar is in those things?
Of course not because you’re a man and that’s not a man’s breakfast.
What’s left for women to do at home after the automatic, no-scrub dishwashing machine has cleaned up from last night’s supper? You can’t extra wash dishes. That doesn’t make any sense, so that job’s done. And what’s to do while the rechargeable floor sweeping robot — which actually exists — is cleaning up after the children? Flirt with the UPS guy? Yea, that sounds about right. And speaking of children, is there any real mothering to be done anymore? What with televisions and Speak n’ Spells and Happy Meal Educational inserts.
No.
Technology has taken women — who used to be probably the colon of civilization, and transmogrified them into the spleen. That little mass of flesh (well on its way to being replaced by the liver) that hasn’t had a real purpose in thousands of years.
That’s why women hate and suck at technology.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 5 4 3 [2] 1 » Show All
Oh and I am sick of hearing the Rosalind Franklin DNA thing.
She didn’t solve the structure of DNA, she was a worker that took x-ray pictures of samples somebody else created. She didn’t even posess the reasoning skills to interpret the data.
Giving her credit for it is feminist propoganda and is like giving the photolab credit for developing a picture that turns out to be a masterpiece, not the artist
Yes necessity is the mother of invention Enya, I agree with you.
However honestly as far as usefullinventions go men invent over 90% of all useful inventions.
A majority of women don’t have the creative logical reasoning skills to become an inventor, the exceptions are few and far between.
Check the list of Nobel Prize winners for things other than peace, I DARE you to.
When push comes to shove and all the men are taken away, women WILL NOT invent themselves out of situations
As far as war goes, it will become even worse. Women in a group of 5 can’t even agree on what movie to see and talk behind each other’s backs, and you think war will be going away or get any better?
Women without men will destroy themselves.
Education emphasizes more math and science teaching for women, yet men still pass them up on standardized tests.
Seriously all the top Doctors, lawyers, engineers, scientists in my case, GARDENERS, CHEFS, HAIRSTYLISTS you name it the top are men.
THere are a few women here and there that can step up to the plate, but most likely they had a caring father that instilled life’s lessons on them and God bless them
But a majority are superfluous.
Men have already learned to grow organs in the petri dish (a bladder for implantation)
It’s only a matter of time before your Uterus is no longer needed,
You have feminism to thank for that
Well, the only thing we were discussing was maintaining civilization as it presently stands, so let’s leave it to that.
Again, who would teach them?
The only beings on the planet that know the skills necessary to maintain our current technological civilization are men. If they all suddenly went to the mothership and left women behind, there would be no one left with the necessary skills. Women don’t have them.
Agreed.
Note, please, that men do not have a choice. We must take jobs which maintain civilization because women choose not to.
And by the way, we’d have it no other way. We’re proud to be the backbone of civilization: to be otherwise would make us feel like worthless bums who spend all our time mooching off others.
Note that women have no such psychological compunctions.
Point of order: women are almost never seen in any area of work necessary to the maintenance of civilization. A pertinent point when discussing this issue. It’s not that if you walk into a mechanic’s garage you will rarely see a woman; it’s that you can bet any amount of money you like that you will never see a woman.
I didn’t say that women couldn’t do such work. I said that as a group they do not presently posess the skills; and that as a group, they choose not to learn these skills.
The people doing the work are men, the teachers of the skills are men, and the students are men.
My point is that if all men died tomorrow, there would be no students, current workers, or teachers capable of doing the necessary work nor teaching female students how to do it — so it’s probably a good thing that the classrooms would be empty.
There might be women who wanted to learn and were capable of doing the work, but there would be no one to teach them nor enough people currently capable to keep civilization moving.
The reverse is not true: if all women died tomorrow, civilization would continue in a male-only world.
By their own choice, women have absented themselves from any field necessary to the maintenance of civilization. In the process, they have made themselves irrelevant to civilization as well as totally dependant on men for the benefits of the civilization that they enjoy.
And, in a truly disgusting display of cognitive dissonance, as a group women denigrate the men who provide civilization for them.
As long as there were men around to teach them how, sure. Yet, as long as there are men around to provide and maintain civilization for them, women as a group choose not to involve themselves.
Does this tell you anything about the female psyche in general?
For entering its third generation — my entire life, in fact — women have fought for the right to compete with men in areas of life that involve maintaining civilization. Yet now that they have that right and as level a playing field as will ever exist in which to compete, they choose to not compete at all.
Worse yet, they’re proud of it. As a group, they consider maintaining civilization beneath them. As I mentioned above, they’re proud to mooch off of others and will go so far as to denigrate those who provide the civilization from which they benefit.
I don’t know what this tells you about women as a group, but to me, it paints a really ugly picture.
How does a potential female bricklayer or carpenter have the luxury of chosing a clerical job?
What you are now saying is that women have to be forced into all spheres of life as they do not have the initiative to do so themselves. They would rather take it easy and let someone else do it.
I agree. There is no job that a woman potentially could not do…..badly, but men have always ended up doing it because the women did not really want to do it and the men did. But wasnt the Patriachy holding women back from ‘ekwalitee’?
Skills themselves may not be gender specific, but initiative, drive, competitiveness, the desire to achieve, the instincts to protect, and inventiveness are generally associated with men. Thats why men are out there prepared to take on any job and women arent.
The women you now find in various careers today are in fact ‘apeing’ male behaviour. It simply isnt natural to them.
Men are better at being men than women.
Men are better than women.
Yes I know, I was merely highlighting Feminist’s flawed logic. I wasn’t trying to attack you Enya. I actually agree with what you said.
I agree with most part with what Dakota said, it is true that if this were to become a survival situation tomorrow a lot of the women wouldn’t possess the skills to survive. That depends on the nature of the survival situation. I think if left to the wild the modern day man and woman would still be pretty lousy at learning to survive without all technology and civilisation comforts… much of us have lost these skills to survive in these situations. That is not a gender thing. Skills can be learned and perfected, I do not think that they are innate - and not really gender specific either.
Therefore I still maintain that if put under the stress to survive, women would find a way to learn to do these skills - if they had to, in order to survive, they could and I think they would.
That they choose not to take on those professions is because they have that luxury of choice. Just because women are not often seen in these areas of work, it does not mean that they do not posses any of the skills in order to learn to do them. If they didn’t have a choice, I think they would learn and could still manage to achieve the same results.
For example, given the choice between cooking pasta and killing a rabbit for dinner, I would choose cooking pasta; but that does not mean I am not capable of killing the rabbit, it only means I do not want to do it, nor like doing it. On the other hand, were I in a forest and there was nothing else to eat - I would have to kill the rabbit to survive. I think this would be what would happen in a female only survival situation.
For the record Mike, I used that comment as an example of a feminist argument to provide an example of the different ways you could spin an argument from the same fact. Those comments about women being better than men are not from my own opinion. Please do not get confused by that.
Well said Dakota.
I’ve been a property developer for just over a decade. I’ve done all kinds of projects from simple redecorations to multi-storey apartment complexes. In all my years I have NEVER come across a single female electrician, plumber, carpenter, bricklayer, roofer, labourer, plasterer, tiler, scaffolder, heavy plant or machinery operator. I have known bricklayers who have taught bricklaying at institutes and have had female trainees, but they themselves have never actually seen one on site.
Now I have seen females in the property development field. Where? Estate agents and interior designers.
This simple observation speaks volumes. If you want any sort of job done……get a man to do it. If you want a woman to do the same job, there had better be a desk with a comfortable chair, a car to fart around in and a mobile phone to jabber on all day long. If there is a chance that a womans hairdo will be blown out of place or her carefully manicured fingernails will get scuffed up or she will not be able to wear a trendy outfit……..count a woman out.
P.S: Sorry about blowing my own trumpet as it is something women here typically do to impress others. I think this is the first time I’ve ever mentioned here what I do for a living.
“
The ability to bear children does not make women more useful than men. Sitting on your ass, eating ice-cream for 9 months is not a skill or even desirable.
I look out my office window and see towers of glass and steel. It pleases me to know that women played absolutely no part in their construction, the internal wiring, plumbing, air conditioning etc. I can walk for miles in any direction and see nothing but things made by men, even the paving stones and sewers under the street were built entirely by men. Cars built, and maintained by men fly past me, hundreds of them every minute.
This is how we men define being “useful”, ergo - creation or production. We bust our balls every day to keep things simple and functioning.
Men are the very pulse of civilisation. In brief, we are irreplaceable.
The thought of a bunch of women trying to throw up a building or wade through effluent to maintain the sewers is too funny to mention. The thought of a women trying to use a pneumatic drill for road works, even more so. Hell, Don’t even mention chainsaws.
I could literally go on and on, providing more examples of men’s worth and greatness.
Unfortunately it will only fall on deaf ears, taking us straight back to square 1.
“But women can give birth, that makes us better than men”
Sigh
I addressed this in my second post, and let me do so again:
Woman as a group do not posess the skills necessary to maintain civilization.
Want proof of this?
When you call a plumber, who shows up?
When you want a building constructed (house, office, anything), who does it?
When you want a road maintained, who does it?
In any level of manufacturing, who does the overwhelming majority of the labor?
If you have a medical problem beyond the GP level, who is likely to be your specialist or surgeon?
When your car has a problem, who fixes it?
Any area that’s required to maintain civilization is entirely dominated by men. That’s not a sexist comment, it’s a statement of easily-observable objective reality.
For going on three generations, women have had the ability to go into any of these fields — if they wanted to. For perhaps the first of these two generations, one might claim that men quietly conspired to keep them out. For the last generation in particular, this simply hasn’t been the case. Women have shown no real interest. Again, not sexism, just easily-observable objective reality.
The fact is that if all men died tomorrow, women do not posess the skills necessary to maintain civilization. Without men to maintain the skills or pass them on to women, women would not be capable of maintaining it on their own.
One of the interesting things about reaching middle age is that you’ve started to have a decent level of life experience. One of my experiences was attending a trade school in my twenties.
This school taught a wide range of trades, from welding to electronics. It was massively dominated by male students. There were a few women: my electronics program had one (out of fifty) and I’m aware by virtue of hearing a story about a women who had a piece of hot metal fall down her top that there was one in welding. I’m not aware of any women in any other program save computer programming. There might have been one or two, but this was a large regional trade school — and it had no female dorms.
Again, who fixes and maintains every level of civilization?
Under the direction and tutelege of men who were either too old to go to war or who were classified as physically unfit. If they’d've been dropped into the factories on their own, they’d've had no clue what to do.
Again, woman as a group do not posess the skills necessary to maintain civilization.
But who would teach them how? Who would teach them how to maintain a car, fix holes in the road, rough in plumbing, build a house, run wiring (and get it tied into a circuit breaker, connect it to external power — all without causing a fire hazard). Who would teach them how to landscape?
Who would see to their health beyond the GP level?
Again, you fail to grasp something very simple:
Women as a group do not posess the skills necessary to invent things.
Invention requires not only a great idea, but the skill necessary to produce it. Women as a group are entirely ignorant of those skills.
See, I’d like to invent a Mr. Fusion: a small device that could be attached to your car that accepts garbage as fuel and produces endless amounts of raw energy (see Back To the Future for details). It’s a grand idea.
Unfortunately, I have no skills to produce such a device.
Wishing that one had a thing will not make it appear.
Women faced with maintaining a civilization whose mechanisms they do not understand would be exactly the same. Sure, they might wish to fix a road full of holes, but they don’t have the skills to do it. They might wish to build an office building, but they don’t have the skills to do it. They might wish to maintain their car, but they don’t have the skills to do it.
Nor do they have any real interest in doing so. If women as a group had such an interest, two generations after feminism we’d see women as an integral part of the system.
Another topic entirely, but for the record, I think it’s pretty grand. It has its problems, but as utopia is not an option, we muddle along.
Anyone who disdains modern technological civilization is simply ignorant. Go read a few history books to see how the majority of human beings throughout history has lived and then tell me if you don’t think what has been accomplished isn’t pretty damned remarkable.
Absolutely — and what can be done is being done. Utopia is not an option.
Civilization exists as a side-effect of the free market. Find me a shithole, and I will show you a place where the free market has been restricted or outright forbidden from existing.
Which, by the way, explains a great deal about where one finds shitholes even in the United States … but I digress. Again, a different topic entirely.
It is not. It is objective reality. Again, think of anything that you use on a daily basis that is part of a technological civilization. Who built it? Who maintains it? Who innovates more of it?
Men. Not women: men.
And not because women can’t or because men are stopping them. Women can and men as a group aren’t standing in their way. It’s because women as a group don’t want to learn and in fact are generally disdainful of the men who do.
In fact, your various comments about whatever flaws and failings exist in modern civilization are indicative of the general level of female ignorance about how these flaws exist and what can be done to correct them.
You think there are flaws? Fine — set out to fix them. But if you’re going to do so, you need a practical understanding of why they exist and what can be done to correct them. Simply bitching about them isn’t enough.
A successful business operates because its principals understand the free market. They understand why it works, and they understand that it is an integral part of the human psyche. It’s how we, as highly-territorial sapients with a desire for self-determination function on a basic psychological level.
Women as a group do not have an understanding of this concept. Without this understanding, they cannot run businesses.
As long as women think business can be conducted in some way other than based on psychological principals, female-run businesses will fail.
And again, what happens if your power companies fail? How will you continue to live without an electric potential at all of your outlets?
I agree, but it’s worth discussing because it points out just precisely how useless to the maintenance of civilization women have become.
Again, it wasn’t always like this. Half a century ago, women held a vital role in the maintenance of civilization. Amazingly, feminism stripped them of this role and made them irrelevant.
Of course women have the potential to be good for something other than breeding. The truly sad thing is that women in modern society are reduced to the level of attention-whoring and leeching off a male-dominated civilization by their own choice.
Dakota Smith
Christian… I have a question for you.
How can a movement which you claim to make women’s lives such a misery be benefiting them at the same time?
Also this ‘guilt by association’ you mention is a fallacy
Some examples:
* Some charities have been fraudulant. Therefore, charities must be frauds.
* The Nazis supported eugenics. Therefore eugenics must be evil.
* Adolf Hitler was a vegetarian. Vegetarianism must be evil.
I have been observing your posts and with each one of them you seem to support the following premises and conclusions.
All feminists are women.
Therefore all women must be feminist.
All feminists hate and want to destroy men.
Therefore all women must hate and want to destroy men.
You will also notice by following the link that this fallacy has connections to propaganda techniques - namely the negative use of ‘false connections’.
Everyone’s opinions are based on fact (although to varying degrees). An opinion is often a point of view upon something that exists in the world. Dick does refer to fact, but that is not the same as fact.
This is the difference between fact and opinion.
Fact: Women can develop babies, which is one thing that men cannot do.
Opinion: The only thing that women can do that a man cannot do is make babies. Women are therefore useless except when they are having babies.
A feminist could take the same fact and give the opinion that maybe women are more useful than men. Men are just sperm banks.
Other feminists often take the same fact and argue that women are better than men because they are the life-givers.
None of these are using a different fact - they are taking the same thing and using a different spin upon it.
Really don’t care whether you agree or not…….
Dakota Said:
Well, I don’t agree. I think if men were wiped off this planet and say there was a way to reproduce without men - I wouldn’t be so sure that women would not continue to keep the world going. I mean, a lot of women during World War II had to take over men’s jobs -I don’t think they did a bad job in keeping the war effort going. If women don’t do as good a job as a man, it does not mean that the whole world is going to collapse, maybe it will just take on another way of doing things.
They say necessity is the mother of invention, I am sure if either gender were caught out without the other, somehow or another (assuming that reproduction could still continue by some new technology) - the women or men would work out a means to live and they will live. There is little to say that either society will collapse.
This leads me to another thought. Who says that this civilisation that men have built is so great anyway? Yes,a small percentage of the world population live in luxury . Everybody else lives in a shithole and as of yet nothing is done to really resolve that - although I do not doubt that there are the resources and the means to do so.
A lot of the time the human race is raping our planet with excessive greed and stupid levels of consumption…don’t get me wrong, I am not blaming men for the evils of the world - but if you want to claim ownership to creating human civilisation then you must claim some responsibility for these ills as well. (Although I would prefer to state that humans create systems and at the moment these systems are flawed.)
I guess my argument boils down to this. It all depends upon your viewpoint. From one point of view, the entire human race can be seen to be superfluous in the bigger world picture. What good have any of us done to the world? At the moment we are damaging it. If the human race were wiped off the planet, the planet would not collapse and die - life moves on. Life does not depend on human beings. Most of the time we have a more arrogant picture of ourselves than which is healthy.
The same would go for the unlikely event that one gender will disappear altogether. Men or women in this situation would find a means to survive - in whatever way that would be. The system of business may collapse in a female society (I don’t think it would, but lets say for argument’s sake it does) but there are other systems that could be developed - maybe business in a post man world would be conducted in a different way? Who knows? Who cares? At the moment these scenarios are unlikely because survival for either sex without the other is improbable without the means to reproduce alone.
The barebones of your point is right that the only thing that women can do that men CANNOT do is reproduce - that is a fact. Yet this does not mean that this is all she is good for - as if somehow human beings can be only be valued by their function and production. That is a very bloody-minded way to put a value to life.
This argument reeks of eugenics - simply by association of this idea that human beings (women in this case) are only valued by function. I cannot agree with this.
Well stated Dakota S.
Every one keeps reminding those dumb bitches that feminism will without fail make their lives a misery. We have had guys, here and elsewhere, telling us how miserable women are without male partners, how some just burst into tears as they are so lonely, feel unwanted and have no male friends.
This is only the beginning of the nightmare that’s in store for women in the long term.
We already witness the behaviour of women deteriorating into common “whores and skanks”, we already see the massive increase in criminal activity and massive increases in the incarceration of women. They are building new jails already.
All thanks to feminism, it this actually keeps you on-side then in comes “cause and affect”.
Women are responsible for the issues that negatively affect men, Man will affectively hold you accountable.
Denying feminism makes no difference, guilt by association plus deriving benefit from their hate agenda is sufficient.
Dick’s opinion consists of life’s experience and as such found women to not only create more problems and issues but are incapable of finding any solutions to them.
Thereby the “women are useless” comment makes sense and is correct.
Women just leech off society and create all the hassles that we as men have to constantly deal with. In doing so, women keep themselves busy creating insurmountable and incomprehensible problems out of nothing.
The correct term is “wallowing in an ocean of emotion”, the most apt explanation I can think of, explaining the functioning ability of a women.
Well then I will.
-Dick
Thanks. I do find it extremely ironic that the feminist movement’s primary legacy is to transform women into nothing more than breeders.
Dakota Smith
Thanks, Dick and James. Feel free to use the argument with your female friends — it should be good for a nervous breakdown or two. ;)
Oh, and since I’ve got a few minutes, let me answer the inevitible female objections to my argument:
The knee-jerk reaction is generally: “Well, men are superfluous, too, and for even shorter periods of time: they can just be sperm-donors. If all the men died tomorrow, society would go on.”
But you see, that’s not true. Where the abrupt removal of women would cause a brief and noticable upheaval, except for the sudden lack of breeders, civilization would continue. And in fact, I’m quite certain that being faced with a lack of breeders would motivate men to invent artificial methods inside of a generation.
If men disappeared, civilization would immediately grind to a halt. Because you see, where women perform not function that cannot be performed by a man, men do perform functions that cannot be performed by women.
Soldiering comes to mind. Women are terrible soldiers.
Law enforcement. Women are terrible cops.
Women in general are terrible in the business world. Remove men, and businesses will collapse.
Women know next to nothing about construction and in general have no skills for it. Ditto any field of intense manual labor. If men disappeared and a woman’s toilet stopped up, there are not enough women with the knowledge of how to fix it to keep the plumbing moving.
For that matter, few if any women know how to so much as change a tire. One imagines the freeways littered with cars that broke down and were never moved again because women had no knowledge of how to fix them.
Men are absolutely necessary to the continuation of civilization. Remove men, and civilization will collapse. Remove women, and all that will happen is that we’ll invent a technology to do their only remaining vital job.
Dakota, man-points for spelling it out so clearly and bluntly. Like a man. The whole part about women making themselves useless was genius. Dick, you should write an article to the effect of “Women made themselves useless”
-Mr.T