Women can’t spell

Did you know that women are atrocious spellers? It’s an obscure caveat of womankind that will usually elude detection, but I assure that it’s absolutely true.

In order to prove this I’ve compiled a short list of words that women have historically suffered only complete and disastrous failure when attempting to spell. Here is the list:

Chevrolet
bullion
kernels
sandwich
duct tape
beans
trophy

If you want to see this phenomenon in action (and have quite a good laugh at the absurd letters women will attempt to piece together in desperation) prepare yourself for quite a struggle. You see when asked to do things that they are no good at (ie, driving, thinking that does not involve puppies or how much they hate their best friends) women will defer the task immediately to the nearest man. This includes spelling.

Since it is part of our nature to be of assistance — to be constructive and positive at all times (probably because we know so much about so many fucking things), this ploy will work one hundred percent of the time. It’s typical woman manipulation though and nothing else.

I tested woman’s inability to spell properly in the real world by asking a group of ten women to spell the word foundation, which I learned had something to do with make-up completely by accident in an episode of CSI. I felt that this word-familiarity would give women the manufactured advantage that they so desperately need and crave in every fucking thing that they do.

My results not only proved conclusively that women cannot spell, but also that women will refuse to do any task that they cannot.

Now that we say for certain that men are better than women at spelling as well as everything else, I think as men it is our duty as the superior spellers par excellence to save women the disgrace and humiliation of having to clumsily defer any such spelling requests.

To a woman, the alphabet and its inner workings are like the mysteries of a Jack in the Box in the eyes of a child.

Related Articles:

RSS feed | Trackback URI

215 Comments in 212 threads.»

Pages: « 11 [10] 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 » Show All

Comment by Una
2008-03-01 16:24:59

Talon said:

no manhole said:

Actually, I think Una is on to something (unfortunately). What this technique means is that sperm with only an X sex chromosome instead of a Y would be produced by the stem cells. If this was used to fertilize a woman only female offspring would be made.

As you alluded to earlier, the value of sex in the population is the mixing of genes. You would still have mixing of genes from this technique as with this technology two completely different individual genomes would be combined to make an individual.

Hopefully they will snuff out this technique before Una becomes world monarch.

The problem with the technology lies in its execution: it requires a lot of funding, experince and research. Even if it works and women can reproduce without men, it matters little. Because women are going to suffer in the end, as they themselves are not ready to let go of men.

As for men, there will still be the artificial womb, so not much panic there.

Its not like men are going to go obsolete or anthing like that. The reason for this discovery is for men who are infertile, so they can have their own child instead of having their partner artificially inseminated by another mans sperm. And its also good use for lezbians to have their own children together. And the artificial womb is great for gays to have their own children, and its also good for infertile women.
But just because of all this technology, it doesnt mean men and women will all go obsolete. Its not like its going to be a law or something to make your own sperm or to use an artificial womb, its really just for people who need it.

 
Comment by Una
2008-03-01 16:09:17

Muzalon said:

Una said:

Talon said:

There we have the hypocrisy. Bright as the sun.

true, sorry for that…

Oh, the Anglo-American Shiksa and her offhand, repression-fuelled sense of entitlement…!

At least I can admit my errors and have some respect unlike some

 
Comment by Muzalon
2008-03-01 14:52:13

Una said:

Talon said:

There we have the hypocrisy. Bright as the sun.

true, sorry for that…

Oh, the Anglo-American Shiksa and her offhand, repression-fuelled sense of entitlement…!

 
Comment by Talon
2008-03-01 14:51:41

no manhole said:

Actually, I think Una is on to something (unfortunately). What this technique means is that sperm with only an X sex chromosome instead of a Y would be produced by the stem cells. If this was used to fertilize a woman only female offspring would be made.

As you alluded to earlier, the value of sex in the population is the mixing of genes. You would still have mixing of genes from this technique as with this technology two completely different individual genomes would be combined to make an individual.

Hopefully they will snuff out this technique before Una becomes world monarch.

The problem with the technology lies in its execution: it requires a lot of funding, experince and research. Even if it works and women can reproduce without men, it matters little. Because women are going to suffer in the end, as they themselves are not ready to let go of men.

As for men, there will still be the artificial womb, so not much panic there.

 
Comment by no manhole
2008-03-01 14:45:35

Talon said:

Una said:

Talon, you just dont get it do you? I guess thats what i get for talking to a “man”

…when i said the sperm thats going to be comming from us women i ment the sperm being made from our bone marrow cells….dumb ass

You are going to make male sperm cells from female bone marrow? Good luck, and have fun.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/6547675.stm#graphic

Actually, I think Una is on to something (unfortunately). What this technique means is that sperm with only an X sex chromosome instead of a Y would be produced by the stem cells. If this was used to fertilize a woman only female offspring would be made.

As you alluded to earlier, the value of sex in the population is the mixing of genes. You would still have mixing of genes from this technique as with this technology two completely different individual genomes would be combined to make an individual.

Hopefully they will snuff out this technique before Una becomes world monarch.

 
Comment by Talon
2008-03-01 14:33:39

Una said:

Talon said:

And right on the clock, the style over substance fallacy.

Well, yes, I do not bother spellchecking. If you want to play spelling wars, be my guest. Nouns and names are to be capitallized, by the way.

I for one, are more concerned about logical fallacies.

well, we both can agree on something…

We would probably agree on more than you think.

Either way, that is not really relevant. Do you have any futher arguments, or anything in mine you would like to comment?

 
Comment by Una
2008-03-01 14:32:26

Talon said:

No need to apologize, hehe. It is not like I am pissed or something.

I only advocate people be careful what they say, because most trolls in here are actually flaming hypocrites.

I “try” to keep it civil, but it is hard not to go overborad when the opposition also does. Of course, this is a bad excuse, I know that. But if I appear ticked off, that would be why.

Once again, I agree..
yeah, it is hard not to go overboard.

 
Comment by Una
2008-03-01 14:28:52

Talon said:

And right on the clock, the style over substance fallacy.

Well, yes, I do not bother spellchecking. If you want to play spelling wars, be my guest. Nouns and names are to be capitallized, by the way.

I for one, are more concerned about logical fallacies.

well, we both can agree on something…

 
Comment by Talon
2008-03-01 14:27:43

Una said:

Talon said:

There we have the hypocrisy. Bright as the sun.

true, sorry for that…

No need to apologize, hehe. It is not like I am pissed or something.

I only advocate people be careful what they say, because most trolls in here are actually flaming hypocrites.

I “try” to keep it civil, but it is hard not to go overborad when the opposition also does. Of course, this is a bad excuse, I know that. But if I appear ticked off, that would be why.

 
Comment by Una
2008-03-01 14:24:50

Talon said:

There we have the hypocrisy. Bright as the sun.

true, sorry for that…

 
Comment by Talon
2008-03-01 14:23:03

Una said:

talon you proved a point that men are also horrible spellers…

And right on the clock, the style over substance fallacy.

Well, yes, I do not bother spellchecking. If you want to play spelling wars, be my guest. Nouns and names are to be capitallized, by the way.

I for one, are more concerned about logical fallacies, such as the two you just commited. Yes, two. Base rate fallacy would be the second.

 
Comment by tj
2008-03-01 14:16:08

uhhh ok…

 
Comment by Una
2008-03-01 14:15:08

talon you proved a point that men are also horrible spellers…

 
Comment by Talon
2008-03-01 14:09:45

I forgot a few things. Sorry.

Una said:

Talon, you just dont get it do you? I guess thats what i get for talking to a “man”

There we have the hypocrisy. Bright as the sun.

Una said:
…when i said the sperm thats going to be comming from us women i ment the sperm being made from our bone marrow cells….dumb ass

That would be “dumbass” for the desired effect. If you have to insult me to make your point, at least do it properly.

tj said:

well, whats the point in arguing?

question for both talon and una
talon, u and una are obviously not going to agree on anything, so why are you 2 still arguing?

I could go on and on about the rush of the moment, but to be frank, my opposition makes me laugh.

That is why I am here - most of the trolls are stupid, and yet exatly not TOO stupid. I am cnstantly training my skills to argue my point (and it is not always easy) but so far, I have not really suffered any total defeats.

I am bettering myself and getting a rise out of the would-be opposition - what is not to like?

 
Comment by Una
2008-03-01 14:08:36

Because we are what you call, hard headed….

 
Comment by tj
2008-03-01 14:03:37

well, whats the point in arguing?

question for both talon and una
talon, u and una are obviously not going to agree on anything, so why are you 2 still arguing?

 
Comment by Talon
2008-03-01 14:03:21

Una said:

Talon, you just dont get it do you? I guess thats what i get for talking to a “man”

…when i said the sperm thats going to be comming from us women i ment the sperm being made from our bone marrow cells….dumb ass

You are going to make male sperm cells from female bone marrow? Good luck, and have fun.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/6547675.stm#graphic

 
Comment by Una
2008-03-01 14:00:24

Talon, you just dont get it do you? I guess thats what i get for talking to a “man”

…when i said the sperm thats going to be comming from us women i ment the sperm being made from our bone marrow cells….dumb ass

 
Comment by Talon
2008-03-01 13:57:49

tj said:

y do u people argue about all this? Men and women are equal…

It cracks me up, every single time.

Here is the catch: Men and women are NOT equal. They are not CREATED equal, they are not TREATED equal, and they do not ACT equal. And this is the best part: They are not supposed to.

Equality is as tempting to believe in as communism was a few years ago, but the argument set forth is sadly block by a little devil known as Mother nature. Or God, if you are a Christian.

tj said:
i think a womans body is beautiful, and i also think a mans body is beautiful…
the only difference is men have dicks and girls have vaginas
and we do think differently, and see things differently but it really doesnt mean a thing

Wrong. It means everything, and it is why we are having this argument in the beginning.

 
Comment by tj
2008-03-01 13:54:49

tj said:

y do u people argue about all this? Men and women are equal… i think a womans body is beautiful, and i also think a mans body is beautiful…
the only difference is men have dicks and girls have vaginas
and we do think differently, and see things differently but it really doesnt mean a thing

And let me add, that this website proves that men and women are both ignorant and that we both take pride in our genders.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

Close
E-mail It
Powered by ShareThis