Women Caused the War in Iraq

Women caused the war in Iraq. It’s been plain as day to me for a while now — because of my mantuition, but I didn’t want to drop that particular bomb up the ass of feminism because I hadn’t yet acquired the proof.

Someone call the CO. The proof has been acquired.

Just like all other wars, women caused the war in Iraq.

Whatever your thoughts on the war in Iraq, there is one thing that can’t be argued: more than 3,000 US troops have lost their lives in battle. That means if every man who has given his life for freedom in Iraq was an M&M, the deaths of those men would probably fill up a fish bowl. I’m not sure about that because I’m not very good at those guessing games. I’m a man. I’m not about fucking guessing, I’m about facts.

Here’s a fact for you. Since 1960, women and their fat asses have gotten fatter by a magnitude of 24 pounds. That’s 17% more Cushion for the Pushin, making women that much more sensual than they were a mere 50 years ago.

But Dick, what does massive and disgusting weight gain have to do with the war in the middle east?

I’ll tell you, my man friend.

The troops in Iraq have been doing more than building freedom and democracy in these unstable parts of the world. They’ve also been acquiring access to oil faster than women at a Midnight Madness sale acquired fucking claw marks all over her arms. Unlike women, the military does it with class — except the woman parts of the military. They do it with no class.

It doesn’t matter if you think oil is why anyone went to Iraq in the first place. The free world is getting its precious oil regardless of intent. It’s like slapping the shit out of a woman. Even if you didn’t mean to, she’s still going to get turned on by it. If you don’t think that’s true, find me one woman over the age of 17 who hasn’t had a rape fantasy.

Twenty four more pounds of womanly personality equals 469 million more gallons of gasoline per year purchased by the average male just to schlep his prize pig to the movies and back; probably stopping at Starbucks or Coldstone Ice Creamery on the way to and back. Starting to see the big picture?

Maybe if women could skip a meal or hit the treadmill more often than twice every New Years, we wouldn’t be so fucking dependent on oil. We would be exactly 469 million gallons less dependent on oil. I wonder how many of those 3,000 marines that would have saved.

I wonder that, but women don’t. They just keep cramming donuts and bear claws into their gaping maws like no one’s making any more, and somehow they manage to fill their air with their braying and jaw-jacking while doing so. It makes me sick.

If all the reasons women shouldn’t be in the army were M&M’s, you could probably stack them up into space. Jessica Lynch and Lynndie England would be a big fat pair of M&M’s the size of footballs at the very bottom; those ones they sell during Easter.

Man, are those two broads a pair of military grade fuck ups or what?

Women Weigh In. Moo.

Related Articles:

RSS feed | Trackback URI

205 Comments in 205 threads.»

Comment by betterthanmen
2008-08-18 16:12:25

You’re a sorry-ass. Get yourself checked.

 
Comment by Manly Man
2008-04-27 09:08:50

Ritsuka-chan said:

I think it’s funny that you resort to an insult after she totally turns your arguement around on you, and reveals that you twisted a fact for your article.

I think it’s funny that you named yourself Ritsuka Chan. I bet you’re not even japanese are you, you mask wearing, cock hungry vampire? You otakus make me sick. Go watch some DBZ while you rub acne medication on your undoubtedly pock-marked face.

 
Comment by Manly Man
2008-04-27 09:08:22

Ritsuka-chan said:

I think it’s funny that you resort to an insult after she totally turns your arguement around on you, and reveals that you twisted a fact for your article.

I think it’s funny that you named yourself Ritsuka Chan. I bet you’re not een japanese are you, you mask wearing, cock hungry vampire? You otakus make me sick. Go watch some DBZ while you rub acne medication on your undoubtedly pock-marked face.

 
Comment by emcee murdah
2008-04-24 16:14:33

King Wang said:

No, women DID cause the war in Iraq. Here, let me explain with Man-Logic, all of it true and fact:

Had women had more sex with men than talking so fucking much (yes, I know, a Quantum Singularity) then no men would have WANTED to go overseas to kill people………

See? Pure logic, every man here knows it is true, every woman wishes it were not.

There are, in fact, alternatives to talking, which is shutting the fuck up.

yo dude, that makes absolutely no sense, because i would much rather whack off and put up with no sex than going overseas to smash the heads in of a bunch of wankers who I have never met, and have virtually no reason to bother.

i think all of you need to smoke some dope, turn up the bob marley
and feel the love.

 
Comment by Ritsuka-chan
2008-04-10 18:20:39

I think it’s funny that you resort to an insult after she totally turns your arguement around on you, and reveals that you twisted a fact for your article.

 
Comment by Ritsuka-chan
2008-04-10 18:17:26

Dick Masterson said:

Laura said:

Besides, if men are better and more intelligent than women, why are they so easily manipulated by women? Especially going to war and getting killed, just for women.
Wouldn’t that denote a certain lack of intelligence?

Laura, did you get some sand in your vagina?

-Dick

 
Comment by sean
2008-04-09 22:07:05

Some of this stuff is admittedly funny, but anybody who seriously agrees with the guy is not only an idiot, but a shame to guys everywhere. Get over yourselves.

 
Comment by Commander Scott
2008-04-07 23:45:34

kuntvomit said:

i dont luv u anymore cuz u like niggers

Every single woman on the surface of the planet is a fascist, neo-Nazi cunt who is only psychologically attracted to street toughs and the independently wealthy. The above quoted piece of text simply indicates that all women are racist bigots with insufferably strong xenophobic and ethnocentric tendencies. Additionally, contemporary scientific research has actually confirmed that Negro, Hispanic and Anglo-Saxon females are the most prejudiced amongst the entire female population demographic.

The conventional wisdom of male patriarchy has always maintained that between both genders, the female is the more bigoted and intolerant of the two; modern research, such as that conducted by John Tierney on racial preferences in dating behaviour, simply confirms this.

Consistent with this line of reasoning, on an historical level, the great mixed populations (mestizos and mulattoes) of Latin America were the result of the Spanish and Portuguese conquistadors of the sixteenth century. Only men could produce such widespread polygamous bonds, given the fact that male social behaviour is oriented towards the broader population, whereas that of the female, due to its greater association with the maternal instinct and reproductive biology, is geared towards the formation of dyadic relationships with small numbers of social intimates. Moreover, the offspring of such adulterous unions initiated by Iberian men to be with Native women were often sent by these very same men to be both educated and civilized in Madrid or Lisbon during the Golden Age of Piracy. Surely this is a glowing tribute to the greater tolerance and cosmopolitanism of the male!

And what has any woman ever done? Nothing! In fact, it is the female hatred of others that ultimately brought about racial segregation in America and the Holocaust in Nazi Germany; it was through the combined effort of great masses of women, who actively supported and even voted for these thugs in record numbers, that the former slave-owners achieved power after Reconstruction in the late 1870s or that the Nazi party achieved power in 1933.

In short, all women, particularly Yankee, Canuck, English, and Aussie women, deserve to have their faces busted in with baseball bats.

It’s a beautiful day out; I hope I don’t run into any Yankee, Canadian or English whores along the way; it would certainly spoil a most pleasant jaunt to the local convenience store that I am soon planning to take. I would end up having to do a basket full of laundry soaked in menstrual blood at the end of the day.

 
Comment by kuntvomit
2008-04-07 22:12:10

i dont luv u anymore cuz u like niggers

 
Comment by kuntvomit
2008-04-07 19:07:55

hah women caused the war cause their fat…..makes perfect sense.. your mustash is neat.. i luv u..i wish u would slap me

 
Comment by andywattbulb
2008-04-07 07:11:06

woman cause hair to grow on your hands too!

 
Comment by bob
2008-04-02 12:53:59

your a fucking idiot and u seriously need to go jump off a building =] have a great day asshooooollllleeeeeeeeeeeee

 
Comment by detached
2008-01-31 06:37:14

April Glasby, also a woman and stupidly appointed as ambassador to Irag prior to gulf war 1, stupidly told Saddam that the US doesn’t care about border disputes between Kuwait and Iraq.

She was probably just trying to speed up the meeting so she could get her latte and nails done that morning.

 
Comment by son of the suns
2008-01-31 05:17:46

That should be Iraqi loans OWED to Kuwait.

 
Comment by son of the suns
2008-01-31 05:17:09

Wrong.

The issue was Iraqi loans to Kuwait and whether they could be removed or altered.

The Kuwait diplomat said “No, and I won’t be happy until every Iraqi woman is a $10 whore.”

 
Comment by brian
2008-01-31 02:27:31

An article in the Omaha World Herald had an interesting story about Suddam Hussein. He invaded kuwait because the diplomat from there called the women of Iraq whores. So in aroundabout way, women did cause both Iraq wars.

 
Comment by Doubt
2008-01-26 10:49:12

KL said:

No. women didnt cause the war. Men did. Men have been doing that for ages. They are like lower sub human people. They’re animals.

For some odd reason, my posts seem to be diverted away by this little girly-girl. Don’t worry, my examination applies equally to this stock whore as well.
Why in the hell would you post so often and say so little? Do you feel like you’re ‘entitled’ to be given a free idiot pass in every nook and alley you stumble into?
And what in the fuck is this?

KL said:

Most stupid article i’ve ever read.

You do know that you are just spamming up the forums like any other stupid, interchangeable American whore - and then you scream in horror when people get fed up with your bullshit and move overseas. Disgusting, used up, ungrateful parasite. It really is ridiculous that you fail to see such blindingly obvious FACTS. Not opinions, little bitch, FACTS. We differ on our political views, but this is like the fact that the earth is round - you can’t make a logical argument against it. I mean, I know that you think you know a lot - you’re basically too stupid or too self-obsessed to step back and see how mediocre you are - but really, you can’t see how absurd it is for some platform-sandal-wearing 17-year-old schoolgirl to talk about manhood and masculinity as though she knows shit about anything outside of her sheltered existence?
You aren’t funny. You don’t ‘rib’ people, you just piss them off with your lame, overused small dick jokes. You notice how your audience isn’t cheering for you? There are many different people here from many different backgrounds, and even differing political views. However, we share the fact that we are well-educated in our opinions - hence the only way you, in your ignorance, know to counter them is to devolve a logical argument into a series of childish insults. You then proceed to contradict yourself by attacking our maturity and once again using ignorance as an excuse for cruelty.
Do you notice how no one seems to learn anything about themselves from your own emotional beliefs about them, and yet they seem to learn so much about you? According to you, I am homosexual, I am homosexual because I feel that society treats homosexual men better than straight men, have small genitalia, wish I was a girl to the same extent that you wish you were a man, I am mentally inferior to you, and have never had any positive sexual experience whatsoever in a single day of my life.
You do not devote a single sentence of explanation to back up those claims. However, I know that you sound just like the other stupid whores who pester us on our site. You are emotional, vacant, and impatient. When I say you are emotional, I mean that you rarely use logic in your thinking but rather use the same type of egotistical viewpoint a three-year-old uses. You are also self-obsessed and boastful, both flaws of the character. You frequently flaunt your self-proclaimed superiority and achievements as backing for your illogical personal attacks.
Of course, those are just a few of the observations about you. Pretty much, you have every negative personality trait I can think of at the moment. You have probably suggested suicide to someone not as a joke, but rather as just a vacant uttering of your own selfishness. I mean, if you don’t like one thing about him, what right does he have to live? However, you undoubtedly frequently threaten personal bodily harm to those who can not help but to unconditionally love you in one form or another. Perhaps through your promiscuity, the vacant, attention-whoring way you dress, or your excessive compensation of your body and the current social privileges allowed for short, effeminate little girly-girls for actual wit and talent. You also undoubtedly find your sexual habits define very much about who you are. If you are a virgin, your stress it indefinitely, as though not putting out after being paid to do so somehow makes you superior in mind and body than a girl who upholds her promise. If you dress like you want to be fucked, you’d better be planning on getting fucked tonight. Otherwise, you’re just teasing and manipulating men who, through social conditioning, have been taught to believe that some ungrateful whore like you is all they have to settle for.
And then you bitches complain about men stalking you. Really… and is the whole ‘convince men that they are already rapists’ mentality working out so well for you little girls? I mean, if we’re already damned beyond salvation, then we’ll most certainly straighten our act out. Typical feminist brilliance at its shittiest.

 
Comment by KL
2008-01-26 10:36:28

Same to you ”bitch”

 
Comment by KL
2008-01-26 10:35:59

You too bitch.

 
Comment by MansVoice
2008-01-26 10:34:26

Who gives a shit. Fuck off bitch.

 
Comment by KL
2008-01-26 10:25:22

NOT ALL. BUT SOME.

 
Comment by KL
2008-01-26 10:24:45

No. women didnt cause the war. Men did. Men have been doing that for ages. They are like lower sub human people. They’re animals.

 
Comment by King Wang
2007-12-12 17:11:51

No, women DID cause the war in Iraq. Here, let me explain with Man-Logic, all of it true and fact:

Had women had more sex with men than talking so fucking much (yes, I know, a Quantum Singularity) then no men would have WANTED to go overseas to kill people………

See? Pure logic, every man here knows it is true, every woman wishes it were not.

There are, in fact, alternatives to talking, which is shutting the fuck up.

 
Comment by Hilary
2007-12-12 14:51:45

So now we are the cause of Iraq.
Precious.
I don’t believe in the war, unlike topics said by Dick about women, I am a pascifst and think Bush wants oil for his cronies, not so the percentage ( that is shared with men ) of overweight Americans to get oil.
There are in fact alternatives for guzzling oil, such as hybrid vehicles.

 
Comment by Dick Masterson
2007-06-07 18:10:07

Laura said:

Besides, if men are better and more intelligent than women, why are they so easily manipulated by women? Especially going to war and getting killed, just for women.
Wouldn’t that denote a certain lack of intelligence?

Laura, did you get some sand in your vagina?

-Dick

 
Comment by Laura
2007-06-07 15:55:39

You misrepresented your “fact”:
Here’s a fact for you. Since 1960, women and their fat asses have gotten fatter by a magnitude of 24 pounds. That’s 17% more Cushion for the Pushin, making women that much more sensual than they were a mere 50 years ago.

Here’s the acutal fact;
http://www.news.uiuc.edu/NEWS/06/1024auto.html
U.S. weight gain from 1960 to 2002, a period in which the weight of the average American has increased by more than 24 pounds, according to data from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

That’s the “average American” not just American women.

Besides, if men are better and more intelligent than women, why are they so easily manipulated by women? Especially going to war and getting killed, just for women.
Wouldn’t that denote a certain lack of intelligence?

 
Comment by wolfe
2007-05-28 11:50:05

son of the suns said:

Korea was as just a war as Vietnam.

The only reason we even won half of that peninsula is because the Great Ones were still young enough to fight. In Vietnam all that was left was boomer scum wishing they were home getting high and sucking feminist toes.

@SotS, I’m not sure you’re replying to what he’s saying. That said, I’ll reply to what you’re saying.

No, SotS. Though the draft army was a component of the loss, it was so largely in the sense that civilians back home bitched and complained about the war. (And, yeah, I largely agree about the self-indulgent boomers vs the WW2 generation).

But here’s the totally f’d up thing. It was the Greatest Generation that killed Vietnam, ultimately by their votes. And it’ll be the voters that let us win — or lose — in Iraq.

Tangent here: precisely because I’m all for ‘peace and love’, we need to win in Iraq. For it we retreat there, we’ll get hit hard at home.

And can you imagine what will happen with a President Hillary Rodham-Clinton? Nuclear weapons, I’m sure. Swathes of the middle east where sand is converted to glass.

A foreign policy that doesn’t just make people mad at us for a few years, but that makes them mad at us for generations to come.

Speechifying off. And yeah, Korea and Vietnam were just wars.

-wolfe

 
Comment by son of the suns
2007-05-28 09:38:52

Korea was as just a war as Vietnam.

The only reason we even won half of that peninsula is because the Great Ones were still young enough to fight. In Vietnam all that was left was boomer scum wishing they were home getting high and sucking feminist toes.

Unfortunately the WW2 and Korea vets were old by now and in leadership positions, and an entire Army of “i have feelings”pansies isn’t an Army at all.

 
Comment by jxbx
2007-05-28 06:06:08

Stacey said:

good thing we all forgot that george bush has a penis.

Is there more to that or are we supposed to guess?

 
Comment by Sam Adams
2007-05-27 21:57:31

son of the suns said:

I consider it an honor to be specifically named and feared by the scum of our great enemy.

Sorry sots, I got a lotta respect for you from everything you’ve posted, but I’ll decide who my “enemy” is. I’ll give you a quote from Utah Phillips.

“I learned in Korea that I would never again in my live abdicate to somebody else my right and my ability to decide who the enemy is.”

He doesn’t speak for me, but that quote expresses my thinking very succinctly.

 
Comment by Stacey
2007-05-27 21:03:26

good thing we all forgot that george bush has a penis.

 
Comment by UGK
2007-05-27 16:07:51

Hahahahahahahaha this article is among the funniest. Dick is very clever for pointing this out. most people just dont realise that this war was caused by women.
That user ‘female’ keeps posting on every article. That feminist bitch dosent get the message that she is NOT ALLOWED on this website. So ‘female’ please fuck off!

 
Comment by Necroswordsman
2007-04-10 09:27:12

son of the suns said:

I consider it an honor to be specifically named and feared by the scum of our great enemy.

It says they recognise our greatness!

 
Comment by son of the suns
2007-04-10 09:09:59

I consider it an honor to be specifically named and feared by the scum of our great enemy.

 
Comment by sonyad
2007-04-10 07:23:17

manchild said:

you guys are all Fuckers (with the acception of an honourable few)

Nope. You’re perfectly right. I’m saddened to have to admit this, but we all are.

Have a nice day.

- Benny Benassi - Love is gonna save us

 
Comment by man killer
2007-04-10 07:22:52

ooooooo weres dickmatic

 
Comment by Billy
2007-04-10 07:20:46

manchild said:

you guys are all Fuckers (with the acception of an honourable few)

if you had the smidgen of a brain you would realise that without women our world wouldnt function

your all denfensive because somebody can do something better than you

jesus christ i feel like dealing out death threats.
i hope you all die especially you son of sons and billy you fuck moot

and Ralohcs Denrael ill see you in hell

I don’t pussies favors.

 
Comment by manchild
2007-04-10 07:03:16

you guys are all Fuckers (with the acception of an honourable few)

if you had the smidgen of a brain you would realise that without women our world wouldnt function

your all denfensive because somebody can do something better than you

jesus christ i feel like dealing out death threats.
i hope you all die especially you son of sons and billy you fuck moot

and Ralohcs Denrael ill see you in hell

 
Comment by Billy
2007-03-26 19:41:34

Dakota Smith said:

Billy said:

I doubt that there are any intelligent women alive. The words “intelligent women” is an oxymoron.

I know it’s easy to come to that conclusion, Billy, but I don’t think it’s true. There are lots of intelligent women around.

The problem is that they’re incapable of overcoming their emotions. I’ve given a fair amount of thought to this as a father of two girls, because it seems to start very early and it’s not socialization. My kids are among the 95th percentile of intelligence on the planet, there’s no doubt of it in mine or anyone else’s mind. But they are seriously stuck on their emotions.
Good point and it must be a challenge as with most any female to deal with, except you get an early start on the training. Most women we meet are too old to be taught anything.
I am fortunate to have 2 young hard tails and no split tails. I sure wouldn’t trade them for anything.

 
Comment by son of the suns
2007-03-26 18:57:00

“However, I wholeheartedly agree with your conclusion that women caused the war in Iraq. The folks over there in the Eastern hemisphere see how screwed up our women are, and they don’t want that poison spreading. Frankly, I agree with them. The war is about the role of women in society.”

You are wise, Ralohcs. Welcome to the site. Feminism being killed in the womb of the Western republics is humanity’s only true chance.

 
Comment by son of the suns
2007-03-26 18:52:03

Meow no one gives a fuck about your binge drinking habits.

 
Comment by son of the suns
2007-03-26 18:49:34

Because “intelligent” women want so bad to have balls that dating a man with a pair of his own is repugnant to them.

They want the derelicts and scum of society to take in as stray dogs to rule over. But in the end, they just get their ass kicked, cheated on or killed. An ironic justice.

 
Comment by Ralohcs Denrael
2007-03-26 18:33:21

Ralohcs Denrael said:

BUT, women higher-up on the social latter (i.e. women with college degrees - I refuse to acknowledge them as intelligent) seek dregs for companions. The doctor dates the dead-beat; the lawyer dates the janitor; the politician sleeps with the pool-guy, etc…

Dr Z said:

Janitors and pool-guys are very manly occupations, not dregs.

Dr Z, I stand corrected. Janitors and pool-guys are very manly occupations, and I was wrong to put them down. I was drawing on my experience in the heat of the moment, without thinking of the larger repercussions. I once almost got into a fight with my pool guy, and I knew a lawyer woman who was dating a janitor. Let me rephrase:

Women higher-up on the social latter (i.e. women with college degrees - I refuse to acknowledge them as intelligent) seek dregs for companions. The doctor dates the dead-beat; the lawyer dates the guy who just got out of jail; the politician sleeps with the fight-picker-for-no-reason guy, etc…

 
Comment by Dakota Smith
2007-03-26 06:52:07

Well, note that I said that emotion and intellect are often polar opposites as opposed to always polar opposites.

However, what I really meant was this:

When something unpleasant happens in one’s life, one’s first reaction is always emotional. There may be perfectly valid reasons to have an emotional reaction, but the reaction itself usually interferes with how you deal with whatever happened. In order to cope, you eventually have to move past pure emotion and look at what you can do about your situation.

It doesn’t mean that the emotional reaction is invalid or that you should subsume it. It just means that if all you ever do is wallow in your emotional reaction, the problem itself will never get solved.

One of the many differences between men and women is that women rarely move past their emotional reaction. They get stuck on it, wallow in it, and if they ever take action, it’s based entirely on their emotions with little intellect behind it. This can often have the effect of making the situation worse.

It really depends on the circumstance to a great extent. Bottom line, however: women get stuck on how they feel and never gain any perspective but that. Since the world doesn’t revolve around a woman’s emotions, it’s very easy for them to react inappropriately to a given situation.

 
Comment by Luka
2007-03-26 06:11:48

I don’t agree that in all situations emotion and intellect are polar opposites. Not all intellect involves cold analysis, nor does all emotion reflect hot headed irrationality. I guess it depends on your definition of intellect.

Some people are intelligent at how they manage and recognise their own emotions and the emotions of others. In my view, intelligence is not always an absence of emotion using cold analysis or lists of figures and graphs. It can be in how you manage yourself, how you handle your mind (which is in my understanding the root of emotion) and the feelings of others in crisis situations as well as daily interaction. If you look at intelligence in this light it would seem that emotion and intelligence have a close relationship with one another, rather than being at odds with the other.

 
Comment by Dakota Smith
2007-03-26 05:47:51

Billy said:

I doubt that there are any intelligent women alive. The words “intelligent women” is an oxymoron.

I know it’s easy to come to that conclusion, Billy, but I don’t think it’s true. There are lots of intelligent women around.

The problem is that they’re incapable of overcoming their emotions. I’ve given a fair amount of thought to this as a father of two girls, because it seems to start very early and it’s not socialization. My kids are among the 95th percentile of intelligence on the planet, there’s no doubt of it in mine or anyone else’s mind. But they are seriously stuck on their emotions.

This has informed how I raise them: in many cases, rather than try to immediately help them intellectually with a problem, one has to spend time cuddling and making them feel better. Once they’ve reached the point where their emotions have subsided, then you can start to talk rationally about whatever is bothering them.

Part of my job as a father, I think, is to encourage them to find ways to deal with their emotions as effectively as possible so that it doesn’t interfere with living their lives. I or another man will not always be there to make them feel better and coach them into making rational choices, after all. In order to survive and prosper, they need to be able to do that on their own.

Yes, there are smart women out there. However, they’ve never been taught how to deal with their emotions, so their emotions totally rule their lives. Since emotion and intellect are often polar opposites, this has the effect of making them appear stupid.

 
Comment by Billy
2007-03-26 02:21:17

meow. said:

But anyway, maybe if you were somewhat intelligent, like myself, you might realize that for one, that comment wasn’t fucking directed to you, & two, that was mild use of figurative language.

Intelligence is someting others could agree with. I doubt anyone here other than a female would consider you intelligent. I doubt that there are any intelligent women alive. The words “intelligent women” is an oxymoron.

 
Comment by Billy
2007-03-26 02:15:58

Female said:

No you may not ask as it’s none of your business, however, you are wrong in your hypothesising.

She is a professional bitch. That’s not hard to figure.

 
Comment by Female
2007-03-25 22:29:55

Ralohcs Denrael said:

Let me ask you Female, what is your occupation, and what is the profession of your last five companions or one-night stands? Why don’t you prove my point for me by not answering…

No you may not ask as it’s none of your business, however, you are wrong in your hypothesising.

 
Comment by meow.
2007-03-25 20:24:01

son of the suns said:

Meow I don’t have a 16 year old estrogen resonating cluster fuck in my skull, but what the fuck is “grow an addiction”? Oh wait, I don’t give a fuck.

Grow an addiction, as in start using drugs or alcohol to cope.
& an addiction IS something that grows. Don’t even try to debate me on that one.
But anyway, maybe if you were somewhat intelligent, like myself, you might realize that for one, that comment wasn’t fucking directed to you, & two, that was mild use of figurative language.

 
Comment by Dr Z
2007-03-25 20:23:59

“BUT, women higher-up on the social latter (i.e. women with college degrees - I refuse to acknowledge them as intelligent) seek dregs for companions. The doctor dates the dead-beat; the lawyer dates the janitor; the politician sleeps with the pool-guy, etc…”

Janitors and pool-guys are very manly occupations, not dregs.

 
Comment by dalsgaard
2007-03-25 19:21:46

Female said:
So you can either be rude and remain all alone, or be rude and attract an insecure woman who most likely has a personality disorder to match your own and both be miserable together.

Who says that I put up an act, female?

What most women percieve as a selfish, rude, or at times arrogant asshole - is just me being myself. I don’t hide behind fucking curtains, and I willingly share every aspect of my fucking personality uncensored.

And believe me, I’m a fun guy to be around. I’m a great guy to be around actually. But if I get pissed off, or I have something on my mind - I’ll let it out. And only a few people can handle that.

Maybe that’s why they are attracted to me? Because they are too afraid to just be themselves? Let go? I don’t tie myself to the past, I live right here, and right now.

Still your comment got me thinking. Because yes, every woman I have EVER dated, has been seriously crazy in one way or the other. They crave attention, they try to screw with your mind, they will jump out of their own way to make you jealous…. Truth be told. They are nutcases.

 
Comment by Billy
2007-03-25 19:21:24

Female said:

I’m pretty sure no one here was using the term chivalry according to it’s original religious meaning.

I couldn’t care less whether you men act chilvarous or not, however the fact is is that a woman of average intelligence is not going to find a man who acts like a selish, inconsiderate idiot, all that attractive. And that’s just life. So you can either be rude and remain all alone, or be rude and attract an insecure woman who most likely has a personality disorder to match your own and both be miserable together.

You dumb bitch you have no clue what we want.. If you did you would have left this site forever. But you come here proving how you women of average inteligence can’t make anyone happy.
Make us all happy you witch; climb on your broom and leave the room..

 
Comment by Ralohcs Denrael
2007-03-25 19:11:16

A couple things:

Female said:

the fact is is that a woman of average intelligence is not going to find a man who acts like a selish, inconsiderate idiot, all that attractive. And that’s just life.

You could not be further from correct. One would think that women always trade up, but this is not the case. Women at the bottom of the social hierarchy (dumb blonds, folks born poor) are gold-diggers, BUT, women higher-up on the social latter (i.e. women with college degrees - I refuse to acknowledge them as intelligent) seek dregs for companions. The doctor dates the dead-beat; the lawyer dates the janitor; the politician sleeps with the pool-guy, etc…

Let me ask you Female, what is your occupation, and what is the profession of your last five companions or one-night stands? Why don’t you prove my point for me by not answering…

People are naturally attracted to their compliment. That’s why women who act like men seek pussies for companions (see also: lesbianism).

As for women and the war in Iraq, Dick, I love that your site is opening the eyes of men everywhere, and I think you are among the manliest men on the manet, but I must take exception to your argumant. The difficulty in the weight-gain argument is that a 24 lbs. weight gain across the board is a linear Y-increase on the graph. The whole line shifts upward by 24. The constant factor “24″ can not be considered significant compared to the exponential increase in the species’s weight caused by population growth.

However, I wholeheartedly agree with your conclusion that women caused the war in Iraq. The folks over there in the Eastern hemisphere see how screwed up our women are, and they don’t want that poison spreading. Frankly, I agree with them. The war is about the role of women in society.

 
Comment by Female
2007-03-25 17:34:00

I’m pretty sure no one here was using the term chivalry according to it’s original religious meaning.

I couldn’t care less whether you men act chilvarous or not, however the fact is is that a woman of average intelligence is not going to find a man who acts like a selish, inconsiderate idiot, all that attractive. And that’s just life. So you can either be rude and remain all alone, or be rude and attract an insecure woman who most likely has a personality disorder to match your own and both be miserable together.

 
Comment by Dakota Smith
2007-03-25 16:24:13

dalsgaard said:

son of the suns said:
Chivalry doesn’t require strength in a world of modern women. It requires idiocy.

This is a great quote.

I totally agree. I’m going to remember that one for the rest of my life. Kudos, SOTS. :)

 
Comment by Necroswordsman
2007-03-25 08:16:58

Luka said:

Um…I don’t see much weakness in the above code…nor does it state that thou shalt hold doors open for thy mistress…does it?

I open doors because it gives me happiness to know I helped someone. Especially old ladies, bless them.

 
Comment by dalsgaard
2007-03-25 07:00:45

son of the suns said:
Chivalry doesn’t require strength in a world of modern women. It requires idiocy.

This is a great quote.

 
Comment by son of the suns
2007-03-25 06:13:32

“beyond reproach”?

Sounds more like a baby killing dyke than an angry vet who would rather spit in the face of God than hold a door for a woman.

 
Comment by son of the suns
2007-03-25 06:07:09

Female responding to my posts to others is pointless if you wish to have intelligent discussion because I infact hate the air you breath.

Chivalry doesn’t require strength in a world of modern women. It requires idiocy.

 
Comment by sonyad
2007-03-25 06:06:54

Ey? No. One’s fly. Facilitate access.

- House Nation mix p1 - Delerium - Heaven’s Earth

 
Comment by Luka
2007-03-25 05:25:31

The pearly gates? ;-P

 
Comment by sonyad
2007-03-25 05:04:08

Better hold something else open instead.

 
Comment by Luka
2007-03-25 04:54:16

Chivalry is an honour code that existed in the middle ages, it has little to do with “holding doors for women” and all that.

This is an example of the code as written by a 19th Century Historian…

# Thou shalt believe all that the Church teaches, and shalt observe all its directions.
# Thou shalt defend the Church.
# Thou shalt respect all weaknesses, and shalt constitute thyself the defender of them.
# Thou shalt love the country in which thou wast born.
# Thou shalt not recoil before thine enemy.
# Thou shalt make war against the Infidel without cessation, and without mercy.
# Thou shalt perform scrupulously thy feudal duties, if they be not contrary to the laws of God.
# Thou shalt never lie, and shall remain faithful to thy pledged word.
# Thou shalt be generous, and give largess to everyone.
# Thou shalt be everywhere and always the champion of the Right and the Good against Injustice and Evil

Um…I don’t see much weakness in the above code…nor does it state that thou shalt hold doors open for thy mistress…does it?

 
Comment by Billy
2007-03-25 03:32:07

Female said:

son of the suns said:
You’ve said I’m a chilvalrous pussy like wolfe when I’ve demonstrated no such weakness, and you constantly take opportunities to shit on me for no reason

I think you may also find that chivalrous behaviour requires strength, not weakness,.
Sure you women want more of the give me, give me guys. There is never enough handouts for you women. Yet all you women give is misery.

 
Comment by Female
2007-03-24 22:43:32

son of the suns said:
You’ve said I’m a chilvalrous pussy like wolfe when I’ve demonstrated no such weakness, and you constantly take opportunities to shit on me for no reason

I think you may also find that chivalrous behaviour requires strength, not weakness, no suprise that you wouldnt understand that, so yeah go ahead and shit on wolfe if it makes you feel all better, I am sure that as always you simply wont deserve any retaliation you may receive, seeing as you are beyond reproach in all matters.

 
Comment by Necroswordsman
2007-03-24 19:39:18

P Coderch said:

I am not the one asking other men if they have crushes on me, you faggot.

No but you are the one expressing homophobia. Faggot is not a nice word for gay people. More insulting.

 
Comment by son of the suns
2007-03-24 19:02:59

You’ve said I’m a chilvalrous pussy like wolfe when I’ve demonstrated no such weakness, and you constantly take opportunities to shit on me for no reason.

 
Comment by P Coderch
2007-03-24 18:56:07

Necroswordsman said:

P Coderch said:

monster denial about his own homosexuality desguised as homophobia.

You mean what you’re doing? I see, all makes sense now.

I am not the one asking other men if they have crushes on me, you faggot.

P Coderch

 
Comment by P Coderch
2007-03-24 18:54:50

Necroswordsman said:

P Coderch said:

monster denial about his own homosexuality desguised as homophobia.

I’m not the one asking other men if they have crushes on me, you faggot.

P Coderch

You mean what you’re doing? I see, all makes sense now.

 
Comment by Necroswordsman
2007-03-24 08:35:47

P Coderch said:

monster denial about his own homosexuality desguised as homophobia.

You mean what you’re doing? I see, all makes sense now.

 
Comment by P Coderch
2007-03-24 00:08:05

son of the suns said:

Pcoderch, you are one stupid fuck.

I agreed with your post though. Where do you lump me in with wolfe? I’ve never been for any kind of chilvalry. Do you have a boycrush on me?

I don’t know what’s funnier: this fag thinking that there’s something wrong with having boy-crushes or him assuming that I would have a crush on him. HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA…monster denial about his own homosexuality desguised as homophobia.

P Coderch

 
Comment by son of the suns
2007-03-22 20:42:27

Meow I don’t have a 16 year old estrogen resonating cluster fuck in my skull, but what the fuck is “grow an addiction”? Oh wait, I don’t give a fuck.

 
Comment by meow.
2007-03-22 19:20:37

I would like to thank P Coderch for the lengthily laugh I enjoyed when reading his recent comments. Seriously, like take a chill pill. Or even grow an addiction. If you get this stressed out over menial shit like this website & [most] of the people on it, then you’re are not going to live very long. Learn to manage your stress. & please, do realize, if you write me back another mental driven message, I’m only going to laugh, but feel free.

 
Comment by son of the suns
2007-03-20 06:07:37

Wrong.

There’s always those “men” who will fuck anything that moves no matter how empty the headcan is.

 
Comment by pjanus
2007-03-19 19:28:35

son of the suns said:

Wrong pjanus. The puppet masters know women are dumbfuck whores who are buying into casual sex and partying. Their infantile minds consider one night stands to be “interpersonal relationships”.

Yes, those interpersonal relationships too.

 
Comment by Dakota Smith
2007-03-19 11:33:20

Dakota Smith’s Tips For Debating Women on the Internet

Ignore them.
Responding only encourages women, which is a Bad Thing. Firstly, it’s bad for their psyches, because participating here only upsets her. Secondly, exchanges with them uniformly tend to decrease the signal-to-noise ratio on the site.

If you can’t ignore them, make your responses short and to the point.
Be coherent and limit yourself to a few sentences. Lengthy posts encourage encourage women to form subjective interpretations of what you’re saying and will almost always result in a complete misinterpretation.

Limit posts to single topics that implicitly discourage a response.
If you (unwisely) request a response or word your post such that a response is implied, frame it such that it can be answered yes or no. This will either force a simple answer or send a woman into an emotional diatribe about non-sequitors that can be ignored.

Most of all, don’t let them bait you into responding emotionally.
As we know, women are extremely good at this, and will resort to it as a tactic whenever they find themselves at an intellectual dead-end. Don’t fall for it! Ignore any emotional content of their posts and simply respond to what she’s said as calmly and coherently as possible.