Doctor? I Hardly Knew Her!

If there’s one thing that women can’t do as well as men more than anything else, it’s be a doctor.

Men have been being doctors since the beginning of time. Thousands of men throughout history have devoted their lives to it in such a way that the wake of their mantastic sacrifices reverberate all throughout history — which is every man’s true goal.

Every woman’s true goal is to make everyone around her sorry for everything they ever fucking did.

First let me be clear on something. A doctor is someone who deals in medicine, prescriptions, surgery — things of a medical nature for which an expensive education and a government licensed certification are required. Things that do not make you a doctor are dealings in: yoga, herbs, Feng Shui, massage therapy, tons other bullshit. This is an important distinction to make because women are good at all those things. Women are attracted to that kind of feel good, new age, weirdo malarkey like flies to pigs and pigs to shit. However, while they may be good at them, none of those things have any kind of medical use or purpose — except to waste time.

They don’t make you a goddamn doctor either. That’s why there’s no abbreviation for guru, like Gr. Bobby Sinclair. You can touch your ankle to the back of your head? That’s great, but the state medical board doesn’t give a shit and neither does anyone with a broken ass.

Being a doctor is a high pressure job where lives hang in the balance every day and one fuck up can cost you even worse — millions of dollars. High pressure? Have you ever seen a women drive a car to a sporting event? Good luck, she won’t ever do it because the extreme pressure of waiting in a fucking line and letting dickheads cut her off would make her head explode. Watch a woman drive in traffic. The moment she senses any pressure at all — and I mean any, something as simple as changing lanes — she crumbles like a card house built out of Graham crackers.

When it comes to pressure, women are a complete joke. Women can handle pressure as well as they handle giving birth — pathetically and while looking for the nearest man to scream at and/or physically abuse the whole time.

I’m sure I don’t even need to say that being a doctor also requires logic and problem solving skills. Women have none of those. The only thing women should be doing in a hospital is wearing nurse outfits. That doesn’t mean they should be nurses either, just wear the outfits.

Related Articles:

155 Responses to “Doctor? I Hardly Knew Her!”

Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 78 » Show All

  1. MansVoice Says:

    Clair said:

    Mike5150, you can’t deny though, that there WERE men that chose jail over war. Yes a minority, but there were some. They count to. I’m not belittling them by any means though.

    Then why you bring up that point?? Do exceptions in such minor cases matter?

    Clair said:

    The drafting issue, I’ve already discussed this with MansVoice (I’m pretty sure it was, forgive me if I’m wrong) when he advocated that I fight that woman should be drafted to. To which I replied no, I don’t support drafting.

    Pray tell then.. who will defend the lands?

  2. Clair Says:

    Yes. Minorities count.

    Those that CHOOSE to go.

  3. mike5150 Says:

    That’s right Clair you don’t support drafting. The whole point of the womens movement is everyone is treated equal.

    If the feminists believed in equality they would come to the aid of men in this matter. If they wan’t to be equal they must become eligible themselves, or eradicate it.

    Yes, there were some men who fled the war. It’s the same with any war. What 000.1% of them have to do with this I don’t know. So how does that validate women not being drafted?

  4. Clair Says:

    mike5150 said:

    If the feminists believed in equality they would come to the aid of men in this matter. If they wan’t to be equal they must become eligible themselves, or eradicate it.

    Maybe you should take this up with your local feminists. Sounds like a good idea. I’d support it.

    (I left a comment on another thread, you obviously didn’t read it yet, but it was just a minor thing. I was just letting you know “wan’t” is spelled “want”. Just so you know. I originally though it was a typo, then it kept happening, so I thought I’d just point it out for you.)

    Yes, there were some men who fled the war. It’s the same with any war. What 000.1% of them have to do with this I don’t know. So how does that validate women not being drafted?

    It doesn’t. Plain and simple. This originated from a comment made by MansVoice, he how men just suck it up and go to war, I mentioned that not all men did that.

  5. hope Says:

    Mansvoice, yes men fought for the war. I understand that. I clearly stated I did too. But women couldn’t be in the war. If they could, they would. You know how I know? Look at the number of women going into the army now. Yes, there are still more men than women, of course. You know why that is to? I know several parents like this, well, fathers, and there ought to be some other fathers like this too. I won’t mention any names but, my dad grew up in Oklahoma and we were visiting a friend of his and they got into this conversation. The man has 3 children. Two girls and one boy. One girl didn’t care for the army, navy, marines, air force, or coastal guard. That was fine. The other girl though, wanted to go to Iraq, he wouldn’t let her. They argued and she pleaded, but he wouldn’t let her. The boy though, hated the idea of war. He was somewhat of a quiet protester. Know where he is right now? Afghanistan. Why? Because his dad believed in something close to a traditional economy. He fought, his father fought, his grandfather fought, and now his son is fighting. But I do have 5 cousions in the army. 3 of which are women, two of which are men.But wven when women couldn’t fight, they were fixing up their wounds, bring them something to drink, to eat, and some of them actually fought. If you were so good at history you’d know that. So we weren’t doing nothing. But kinda irrelivant but I hope to God you have no children. And are you sure you’ve won awards for history? Living in America, or a democracy for that matter, you don’t earn rights. You are given rights. It’s against the law for you not to be given rights. But contain yourself. Your jugular’s popping three inches out of your neck.

  6. MansVoice Says:

    Clair said:

    It doesn’t. Plain and simple. This originated from a comment made by MansVoice, he how men just suck it up and go to war, I mentioned that not all men did that.

    Then you are being moronic. Its apparent that there are exceptions in all cases. The very premise of our site can be disputed because there are exceptional women. Like all women, you prevaricate around the issue. So, is your intent just to “win the point”? Because you sure as hell made no fucking sense.

    Imagine this. A teacher said “Class, you did well for your maths test”. The result is, 98% of the class got an A or a B. 2% failed. Does the general statement still stand? Fuck yes.

  7. MansVoice Says:

    hope said:

    Mansvoice, yes men fought for the war. I understand that. I clearly stated I did too. But women couldn’t be in the war. If they could, they would. You know how I know? Look at the number of women going into the army now. Yes, there are still more men than women, of course. You know why that is to? I know several parents like this, well, fathers, and there ought to be some other fathers like this too. I won’t mention any names but, my dad grew up in Oklahoma and we were visiting a friend of his and they got into this conversation. The man has 3 children. Two girls and one boy. One girl didn’t care for the army, navy, marines, air force, or coastal guard. That was fine. The other girl though, wanted to go to Iraq, he wouldn’t let her. They argued and she pleaded, but he wouldn’t let her. The boy though, hated the idea of war. He was somewhat of a quiet protester. Know where he is right now? Afghanistan. Why? Because his dad believed in something close to a traditional economy. He fought, his father fought, his grandfather fought, and now his son is fighting. But I do have 5 cousions in the army. 3 of which are women, two of which are men.But wven when women couldn’t fight, they were fixing up their wounds, bring them something to drink, to eat, and some of them actually fought. If you were so good at history you’d know that. So we weren’t doing nothing. But kinda irrelivant but I hope to God you have no children. And are you sure you’ve won awards for history? Living in America, or a democracy for that matter, you don’t earn rights. You are given rights. It’s against the law for you not to be given rights. But contain yourself. Your jugular’s popping three inches out of your neck.

    Wow, like all women.. You start off all “rational” and denigrate into a moronic idiot. Why shouldnt I have kids? Pray tell? I dont drink, I dont smoke, I dont do drugs. You are a fucking idiot.

    I have won awards for history. Having been valedictorian, I obviously must have my share of accomplishments. I topped the cohort for history for 4 consecutive years and even participated in numerous National History Tournaments coming in runner ups or champs.

    hope said:
    If you were so good at history you’d know that. So we weren’t doing nothing

    How the fuck is a lifestory picked out from NO-WHERE part of “history” - What a fucking idiot.

    hope said:

    Living in America, or a democracy for that matter, you don’t earn rights. You are given rights. It’s against the law for you not to be given rights.

    My point was, women dont deserve their over-abundance of rights which are “benefits”- lmao. Period.

    hope said:

    But contain yourself. Your jugular’s popping three inches out of your neck

    *Yawns*, what a useless ad hominem. You are hopeLESS, fucktard.

  8. hope Says:

    It wasn’t realevent to the story. I was referring to the fact that some women secretly fought in the war. Like nurses. If you were some intelligent history major, you’d know that.

    Hey it’s true. You get so worked up over something as useless as a website. How immature are you? I know you’re 17, but for you to make fun of someone’s name. Common. I thought we left that all behind in elementary school.

  9. abaddon_fff Says:

    hope said:

    See but those are just some women abbadon. I don’t think that way simply because I hate generalizing. Of course I do it, it’s almost impossible not to in some degree. But I do try.

    Mike, yes we do. Its just those ignorant people with their ‘old values’. The same people that think race is a big factor.

    I agree it’s some women Hope. I didn’t state that all women look at us like that. But it is a social trend that has grown quite steadily over the past few decades. How many Men work in child-care? Do you think it’s because Men don’t like kids, or that Men don’t like jail? How about male teachers? Do you honestly think the drop in male teachers is because Men hate/dislike teaching others? Or is it that any Man that chooses to work with kids is viewed as a pedophile waiting to happen?

    I can tell you that at my job, which is in no way a teaching position, I am a crew-leader and I enjoy teaching younger Men the ropes of the job. There’s something about showing someone something and then seeing them do it that fills you with a sense of pride. Its kind of like watching something grow.

    I digress. Sure not all women think that way, just like I don’t agree with everything that this site has to say, however a lot of it does have some form of merit or something that I agree with. Just like a lot of women DO think that way, or they DO choose to wield power very unwisely. They will never say it to Men, cowardly creatures that they can be, but it dictates how they act and think. You can see fine examples of this type of thinking on TV, the radio, and most feminist literature. Its steadily becoming fact, as opposed to a generalization.

    -Strength and Honor-

  10. abaddon_fff Says:

    Alex said:

    @Abaddon- You make good points. There are a few things I’d like to point out though.

    Appreciated. Point away.

    You talk about women being ignorant when it comes to politics, but I can tell you that definetly is not a trait confined to women. I belong to a non-partisan voter registration organization at my university, and before the 2006 congressional elections, I went door-to-door to encourage students to register to vote. It was interesting, because dorms are segregated by gender (there are “guys” floors and “girls” floors in each dorm). The overwhelming majority of both genders had no clue what I was talking about. “Election for what?”, “Who’s running?”, “I thought the elections were in 2008″, etc. The men were just as bad as the women, sadly.

    Agreed and wholeheartedly Alex. I was simply pointing out what women have done with the vote in that comment, which is to say not much (except cater to themselves). I review canidates and issues and while having no political party to speak of I do vote as well. However I think much of this has to do with the fact that I spend a LOT of time (if I’m not working) reading. It’s quickly becoming a lost art in this society. I picked it up early on, with no help from my school. However that is neither here nor there I suppose.

    Women have the power to vote, but who could they vote for to improve the situation of men? Politicians never address the issue. I support most of the men’s rights issues that come up on this site, but what candidate or political party could I turn to? Neither major party has a stance on it, as far as I know, and the candidates are silent.

    The politicians will be silent for as long as possible. Recognizing that Men have significant issues for redress in society would bring many a house crashing down, up there on the Hill. Politicians don’t address the issue because there is no voting bloc dedicated strictly to Mens issues. Mens voting is divided into camps, which is why our power in the political area is limited.

    On a side note. A lot of the women on here are of the opinion that Men should “do” something. This seems to appear a lot from a gender where everything they really need has already been “done” for them. We ARE doing something. Before any massive or not-so-massive politcal change can occur, there needs to be COMMUNICATION and ORGANIZATION. This is occuring as we speak. It may not be as fast as wanted, but we are working against some serious players in the political arena, as well as our opposite, NOW and the feminist lobby.

    The reasons Men haven’t organized are several fold:

    One is that we as a gender do the serious heavy lifting of society. We are tired. When I get home from work, I don’t think about political uprising, or fighting the good fight, I think about the 12 beers I brought home that I’m going to drink after I get out of the shower and grab a bite to eat. I am not in the mood to discuss politics, or anything until after beer 3-4:) I haul TONS of furniture a day in the busiest part of the year and quite a bit in the slower parts.

    We are broke. Crushing child-support, alimony, higher taxes of single Men, a discriminatory custodial process, the cost of the legal disputes, all take a toll upon lower and middle-class Men. Many of us are homeless, others still are broke or suicidal from having their children stripped away from them. Others are unemployed and under-educated and last but not least take a good look at the vast majority of who is incarcerated? 93% of the inmates in America are Male. Does this go to show that Men are inherently criminals, or that Men recieve little to no help from a goodly portion of society? I don’t know but I think the latter is definitely worth looking into.

    We have no voice. There is currently no organized voice for Mens issues in the political process. That WILL change, I’ll set my watch and my warrant on it. However as of right now there is not one male advocate or lobbyist in the halls of congress and if there is I will guarantee that He/She isn’t taken seriously. Kinda hard to “do” something when you cannot speak isn’t it? Kinda hard to enact change when you are effectively muzzled and shackled with debt.

    Also, the common response is that women wouldn’t support candidates who address men’s rights. I would argue that it’s partly out of fear. I despise the draft, I think men absolutely deserve equal rights to their children, I think women and men should receive the same punishments for the same crimes.

    Fair enough.

    But when I see sites like this where men say in earnest that women shouldn’t have the right to vote, that it should be perfectly legal to discriminate against women in the workplace, etc., I begin to fear for my own rights. I’m sure many other women feel the same way. I support men’s rights fully, but not at the expense of my own. It’s a shame that both genders seem to have a need to try to overpower the other, rather than working together to create laws that are fair to all.

    Sure, there are extremists in every place you look Alex, however do you find my arguments candid, logical, and respectful to a degree? Do I advocate Male domination? Do any of the Men here advocate saaaaaay the wholesale enslavement/death of the other gender? A lot of what is said here can be backed up with some pretty good statistics. Take a look at the rates of high-level intellect between Men and women for one example. Why should you be fearful Alex? Are you afraid that if Men gain some modicum of power as a solid voting bloc, that what happened to them will happen to you? I highly doubt it myself. Some of the Men on here should be disregarded I agree, however there are several Men that bring up some valid points in this little argument.

    One more side note: The feminists are being put on notice. They are creating the counter-movement with every fucked up and biased law that they lobby for. For every Man that is fucked over in family courts, maybe not all of them, but some of them come here and to other sites across the web. For every little power-grab, and money-grab that the feminists clamor for, another Man takes notice and starts to reasearch. You cannot stop an earth-quake, and you are only feeding the fire.

    -Strength and Honor-

  11. MansVoice Says:

    hope said:

    It wasn’t realevent to the story. I was referring to the fact that some women secretly fought in the war. Like nurses. If you were some intelligent history major, you’d know that.

    I have never discredited women’s contributions in war but I said they PALE in comparison to men. If you have a brain, you would have caught that.

    hope said:

    Hey it’s true. You get so worked up over something as useless as a website. How immature are you? I know you’re 17, but for you to make fun of someone’s name. Common. I thought we left that all behind in elementary school.

    Fuck off bitch. Dont talk to me about getting worked up when you write me paragraphs of insults and proclaiming that “I shouldnt have children”. Dont get on the moral high ground you hypocrite. I am way more matured than you because I recognise how this world works and the fact that men are better than women.

    I dont get why the fuck you keep using that catch phrase of “elementary school”. A kid could probably point out to you that fire is dangerous because its TRUE. Likewise, you dont have to be awfully smart to know that men are better than women. Feeling crumpy? Awww, blow me over.

  12. MansVoice Says:

    abaddon_fff said:
    Why should you be fearful Alex? Are you afraid that if Men gain some modicum of power as a solid voting bloc, that what happened to them will happen to you? I highly doubt it myself. Some of the Men on here should be disregarded I agree, however there are several Men that bring up some valid points in this little argument.

    One more side note: The feminists are being put on notice. They are creating the counter-movement with every fucked up and biased law that they lobby for. For every Man that is fucked over in family courts, maybe not all of them, but some of them come here and to other sites across the web. For every little power-grab, and money-grab that the feminists clamor for, another Man takes notice and starts to reasearch. You cannot stop an earth-quake, and you are only feeding the fire.

    -Strength and Honor-

    Very well said. The words are out and there is nothing more scary than that for a feminist.

  13. mike5150 Says:

    Clair don’t get on to me about grammar. I think you are the dumbass who said “coastal guard.”. A father cannot keep a child from going into the service. Provided that child is 18. So women who claim that really don’t want to go.

    You totally contradicted yourself to MansVoice. You said women couldn’t be in the war. That if they could they would. Then you pointed out women in the service today. So, yes women can really be in the war.

    Oh, I see. The can’t join in support roles. They all wan’t to be Rambo and be on the front lines.

  14. Clair Says:

    mike5150 said:

    Clair don’t get on to me about grammar. I think you are the dumbass who said “coastal guard.”. A father cannot keep a child from going into the service. Provided that child is 18. So women who claim that really don’t want to go.

    You totally contradicted yourself to MansVoice. You said women couldn’t be in the war. That if they could they would. Then you pointed out women in the service today. So, yes women can really be in the war.

    Oh, I see. The can’t join in support roles. They all wan’t to be Rambo and be on the front lines.

    …That wasn’t me….go re-read the thread. Lucky you weren’t a woman then, and I wasn’t a man on this site, oh the sexist jokes that would storm down upon thee.

    Oh and you did it again, “wan’t” is spelled “want”. I seriously wasn’t attacking you, I was pointing it out.

  15. mike5150 Says:

    By the way Clair did it ever occur to you that was a mix up? The two of you post the same feminist drivel here.

    How…is this… a proper…sentence? You “wan’t” to be made to look stupid or something? Seriously. You have more grammatical fuckups on one post than anyone here does on an entire page.

  16. MansVoice Says:

    @ Mike: The reason she attacks your grammar is because she has nothing else to hit you with. She loves to strike low and cheap blows.

    As of yet, I have not corrected a woman’s grammar unless she has done so herself. I would respectfully put a [sic] box and leave it at that. I dont see why she is so condescending but then again, she is a woman.

  17. MansVoice Says:

    @ Mike: The reason she attacks your grammar is because she has nothing else to hit you with. She loves to strike low and cheap blows.

    As of yet, I have not corrected a woman’s grammar unless she takes it upon herself to correct others in a condescending tone. I would respectfully put a [sic] box and leave it at that. I dont see why she is so smug.

  18. hope Says:

    Abbadon, see that’s what I hate. But it isn’t just a big factor in women. Like, if a women wears a mini-skirt, a guy is going to think pretty sexually. (If he finds her attractive). But I understand, you show it, they’ll think it. But after they get rejected, they’re conservative and a slut. Just the way it is. And I hate it.

    Hey Mike, that was me about the war stuff. Yeah, I’m not stupid, I know the girl could of gone. But she wouldn’t have any support. Whereas when you go risk your life in another country, that’s the main thing you need. By the way genius, I know women can serve in the war. I stated that I have 3 cousins that happen to be women in Iraq. I meant during the World Wars and Civil Wars and those times.

    Mansvoice, you so mature? I found three extreamly immature things for you to say. Like; fuck off bitch, men are better than women, and blow me over. Way to prove your maturaty. =] But honestly, grow up. Who makes fun of someones name? Huh? I honestly, honestly, thought, that you would of ‘left that behind in elementary school’. No matter how immature your comments were, that just topped the cake right there.

    By the way, she’s not making fun of you. But talk like a dipshit, get treated liek a dipshit. Why is wan’t improper? Do you understand why the apostrophe is even used in grammar. Like for can’t. Can’t is short for can not, pretty sure thats right. The ‘n’s’ are used together for the n in can and the n in not. And the apostrophe is used for the o. Makes it shorter. Explain why wan’t is appropriate. Hmm, too bad you can’t.

  19. abaddon_fff Says:

    hope said:

    Abbadon, see that’s what I hate. But it isn’t just a big factor in women. Like, if a women wears a mini-skirt, a guy is going to think pretty sexually. (If he finds her attractive). But I understand, you show it, they’ll think it. But after they get rejected, they’re conservative and a slut. Just the way it is. And I hate it.

    The rest of your argument is directed at others so I will take the remark as it was written. Everyone thinks sexually, I don’t care what women say. I have been remarked upon sexually, I just don’t take it as personally or get “offended” as easily as women do. Why not take it in stride and move on?

    I agree some people get rejected and feel the need to insult or gossip. However some of this has to do with HOW you go about the rejecting as well and WHO is doing it. Etiquette in such manners is also quickly becoming a long lost artform on both sides. This tends to change (not always) as people mature and grow older. I just view it as oh well, shit happens, theres a million more where she came from.

    -Strength and Honor-

  20. hope Says:

    See but there is a reason why women get offended when guys make sexual remarks. Its because men like some of the ones on this website say that that’s all women are good for. So when a guy makes a sexual remark, a woman will think three things. 1. Damn he likes me. 2. All he wants is to get in my pants and use me. Or the most common, 3. All he thinks I’m useful for is sex. And I’m sorry, but I used to think that and then it started fading. And then I found this website, and I was kinda shocked to see how men really felt about women. Some of them, I laugh, yeah it’s funny, if its a joke. Some of them on the other hand, are really disrespectful. It goes hand in hand, the being disrespectful and serious. One can only hope this website was made for a laugh. Not to honestly be that rude.

Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 78 » Show All

Leave a Reply


Close
E-mail It
Powered by ShareThis