Doctor? I Hardly Knew Her!
If there’s one thing that women can’t do as well as men more than anything else, it’s be a doctor.
Men have been being doctors since the beginning of time. Thousands of men throughout history have devoted their lives to it in such a way that the wake of their mantastic sacrifices reverberate all throughout history — which is every man’s true goal.
Every woman’s true goal is to make everyone around her sorry for everything they ever fucking did.
First let me be clear on something. A doctor is someone who deals in medicine, prescriptions, surgery — things of a medical nature for which an expensive education and a government licensed certification are required. Things that do not make you a doctor are dealings in: yoga, herbs, Feng Shui, massage therapy, tons other bullshit. This is an important distinction to make because women are good at all those things. Women are attracted to that kind of feel good, new age, weirdo malarkey like flies to pigs and pigs to shit. However, while they may be good at them, none of those things have any kind of medical use or purpose — except to waste time.
They don’t make you a goddamn doctor either. That’s why there’s no abbreviation for guru, like Gr. Bobby Sinclair. You can touch your ankle to the back of your head? That’s great, but the state medical board doesn’t give a shit and neither does anyone with a broken ass.
Being a doctor is a high pressure job where lives hang in the balance every day and one fuck up can cost you even worse — millions of dollars. High pressure? Have you ever seen a women drive a car to a sporting event? Good luck, she won’t ever do it because the extreme pressure of waiting in a fucking line and letting dickheads cut her off would make her head explode. Watch a woman drive in traffic. The moment she senses any pressure at all — and I mean any, something as simple as changing lanes — she crumbles like a card house built out of Graham crackers.
When it comes to pressure, women are a complete joke. Women can handle pressure as well as they handle giving birth — pathetically and while looking for the nearest man to scream at and/or physically abuse the whole time.
I’m sure I don’t even need to say that being a doctor also requires logic and problem solving skills. Women have none of those. The only thing women should be doing in a hospital is wearing nurse outfits. That doesn’t mean they should be nurses either, just wear the outfits.
Related Articles:
October 13th, 2007 at 9:59 pm - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6
I wouldn’t be so sure about that buddy.
By “other things”, am I right if I assume you mean sexually orientated activities? If I am, he may have at one point, however if he does not think that way anymore, it means that you have what is called a platonic relationship. There-fore he is not “just a guy who hasn’t screwed you yet..”
October 13th, 2007 at 11:53 pm - IP Man-Hash: eeb32e3dc6874
Platonic relationship means no sex. It doesn’t mean he wouldn’t let you do him a favor. Probably a 90% chance of that.
October 14th, 2007 at 12:22 am - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6
No. Your wrong. Platonic love is free of sexual desire and can be quite spiritual in nature.
October 14th, 2007 at 12:26 am - IP Man-Hash: eeb32e3dc6874
It is free of sex. But not sexual desire. Sorry. Your guy friends haven’t done you. Big deal. But the majority of them would let you skin your knees.
October 14th, 2007 at 12:58 am - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6
Eww…that is really gross. Why would you talk like that? Anyway, it really does mean free of sexual desire. Seriously, I’m 100% sure, look it up. I bet you I’m right.
October 14th, 2007 at 1:22 am - IP Man-Hash: eeb32e3dc6874
You may look at it like that, but I assure you they don’t. Given the chance most of your “platonic” guy friends would let you do that.
October 14th, 2007 at 1:31 am - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6
Did you look up? I’m right aren’t I? Anyway, I don’t know why you had to be so filthy before.
October 14th, 2007 at 1:56 am - IP Man-Hash: eeb32e3dc6874
Your definition is not the most commonly one used. I can tell you for fact what I stated previously about your “platonic” guy friends is true. Your proud about being wrong about everything else, but semi-right about one thing.
It’s amusing you females always say we don’t know you. But yet you profess you know all about us.
October 14th, 2007 at 2:31 am - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6
And you
If I were to act like the majority of people that I have encountered here, I would now resort to calling you derogitive names of a sexual nature, categorize you into the most unfavorable stereotypical groups, and claim I know everything about you thus making the prior statements true. But I wont. You know why though? Because it only weakens your character to do so, shows a severe lack of communication skills, debating skills and a limited vocabulary. Seen as most of you take most of the females on this site as representatives of females, I shan’t do that.
October 14th, 2007 at 2:47 am - IP Man-Hash: 5acb8d5dc39dd
@ Clair: You havent responded to Mike’s post per se. I agree with Mike. You dont know about men as much as you think you do. Men can never truly be friends with women as sex will always keep popping up. Of course, the exception would be that you are a) ugly , b) fat
October 14th, 2007 at 2:55 am - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6
How did I not respond to him?
You can have opposite sex platonic relationships. End of story.
October 14th, 2007 at 4:30 am - IP Man-Hash: eeb32e3dc6874
I didn’t say you couldn’t. But most men will accept sexual favors from a woman even if she’s always been a friend. They might never think of it. Not really. But if you offer it, he will take it. Real end of story.
October 14th, 2007 at 4:37 am - IP Man-Hash: 41f6de747e750
I will do what Dakota did to another ignorant “gal”.
*Sighs*, Clair, do this: Tell a man, any man this “Take me now! Right here!”
Chances are, if he doesnt find you unattractive or fat, he will fuck you on the spot. Try it.
I have spoken to numerous of these men who profess “platonic relationships” with women. Sheesh, most agree that its a bunch of horseshit in a “guys only” discussion. How can we not know? All of us men on this site, have been at one point or another, in these discussions. We know who are the players and the real good ones really know how to call the platonic card.
October 14th, 2007 at 12:02 pm - IP Man-Hash: 6fc645e9b4eb7
I have a best friend since 3rd grade. Who happens to be a male. Not once did he or I think about sexual encounters. You know why? Growing up with someone during a time where sex wasn’t really brainwashed changes a lot of the way you think. Say in high school, we were closer friends than ever. But we didn’t think about sex. Because, if we did, those thoughts would be washed out by thoughts of growing up. Plus how awkward would that be. But if you meet someone during high school or college, it’s different. Yes sex is a factor. But once you get past that it doesn’t mean much. Women might not know everything there is about men, but men don’t know everything about other men. My brother has had so many friends that are girls, he didn’t always think about sex with them. So you aren’t as omniscent as you think you are. But another thing, you say women can’t go without sex. Hmmm. I think just having this minor conversation we’ve proved our theory on that.
MansVoice, I don’t know how many times I can say this but feminist women are fucked up. Okay. Just because those girls did something like that doesn’t mean they can state a name for all women. Like men that rape women. Just because there is a number of occurances doesn’t mean that I’m accusing you of pulling the same card or looking forward to. If you think that way, only two words for you. Grow up.
October 14th, 2007 at 2:50 pm - IP Man-Hash: c3ad53281e7c1
Here’s the rub Hope, while you say that feminist women are fucked up and don’t speak for all women, feminists say that they speak for all women and for the most part at least hold Men in a low regard. You benefit from their actions and hatred. You can sit there all day and say how fucked up it is, and still are the beneficiary of their actions. Thats pretty hypocritical and childish Hope, grow the fuck up.
On women voting: It sounds like a great idea in “equality”, and sure women should get a vote. That doesn’t change what they DO with it. Most chicks I meet can’t even spell “political process” much less participate in it. It’s similar to introducing “Democracy” to extremist muslims in the vain hopes that it will somehow change their lines of thought. Sure sounds like a great idea until you watch what they DO with it. Vote in some radical extremist muslim that wants to blow up western civilization. Blowing civilizations up while cool on the short-term, is pretty childish on the long-term, grow the fuck up Hope.
On “platonic” relationships: They don’t exist, bottom line. Maybe when you get to be about 60 or so, but before then count it out. The best you’re going to get is subverting sexual interest, or denying the fact that sexual tension is there. Denial is childish Hope, so grow the fuck up.
-Strength and Honor-
October 14th, 2007 at 5:07 pm - IP Man-Hash: b24fa70c8e643
Then do something about it.
Women whine about never having achieved anything in History because they were ‘oppressed’. Well, here’s your chance to achieve something without the excuses. Do your part to help fix the problems caused by these, as you say, “fucked up feminist women”.
The integrity of a person is always revealed more by what they DO, rather than what they SAY. Words are cheap…so far that’s all you’ve expended.
- (notice how I didn’t need to call you ‘gay’ or ‘pedo’ while I was making this logical point. That’s what rational debate is…try it.)
October 14th, 2007 at 8:39 pm - IP Man-Hash: 6fc645e9b4eb7
Abaddon, common now. I just said that feminist women are fucked up. Yeah women should be equal and most people agree with that. But that’s not the only card they like to play.
Mansman, what can I do. Tell me and I’ll look into it. But there’s no point. Men won’t respect me any more and nor will women. So I’m not gaining anything but losing something.
I didn’t need to call you ‘gay’ or ‘pedo’ that’s what a rational debate is
Hmm I’m not the only person be irrational. May I remind you how many times you called me a slut?
October 14th, 2007 at 9:21 pm - IP Man-Hash: b24fa70c8e643
It’s not about YOU gaining or losing anything. That’s immaterial. It’s not about other people respecting you. Its about you respecting yourself for actually having done something useful rather than just being a spectator that lazily sits back while progress takes place all around them. Talk is cheap, playing the victim for sympathy is worse.
“Mansman, what can I do?” shirks responsibility. Using initiative to achieve results instead of whining…thats when people get the respect they “seek” (Men don’t do it for that conceited reason, rather for the achievement itself).
Slut is the default position until proved otherwise. The statement is not “irrational”, it’s simply based on wide observation of a particular animal. That makes it a validated hypothesis, in scientific terms. Like gravity, or saying Leopards have spots…and some genius pipes in that ALL Leopards DON’T have spots. It doesn’t represent convincing refutation of the hypothesis. Furthermore, that type of faulty “reasoning” is a Logical Fallacy, and as such clearly invalid.
October 14th, 2007 at 10:13 pm - IP Man-Hash: 2e9f52b62c482
In a nutshell, that encapsulated what I wanted to bring across to Hope. Excellent point. Hope, you are still the beneficiary of the actions of these feminists so by virtue of your sex, you deserve to be called weak .
October 14th, 2007 at 10:42 pm - IP Man-Hash: 23f61237efbe9
Abaddon, just out of interest, did you ever read “No More Sex War” by Neil Lyndon? Quite an interesting read, he suggests that women haven’t benefited much directly from feminism. I think for the most part I agree with him. There are many other factors that have changed the state of women’s lives today, sure feminism has contributed, but you cannot ignore other factors such as the war effort, technology (such as the contraceptive pill)…yet feminism takes the credit for changing women’s lives when the reality is it is one of the many, many factors that led to change.
… I’d also like to challenge you on this idea that women benefit from the actions and hatred of these feminists. Feminists think they speak for all women but they sure as hell do not speak for me, that is why I have my own blog. What do you want women to do? What are you expecting Hope to achieve…? Especially since you know as well as I do that feminists won’t listen to anything other than their cherished ideals - I have experienced this first hand. What makes you think that women who are not feminists have any more power than men in changing the behaviour of skanky women? The only group that benefits from all this is the women who are feminists. But then it depends what you mean by “benefits” I suppose?
Besides, why aren’t men clubbing together and changing the world that they claim to be running. I’m sure if just a group of men made realistic steps to change the laws that are unfair to them, it would happen if they pushed long and hard enough. If men are better than women as this sites states, it shouldn’t be a problem, should it?