How To Shut a Woman Up
Women don’t actually want equality. Women are like the five year old that wants a dog for Christmas and we men are like parents. You’re not getting a fucking dog. Five year olds don’t get dogs because they have no responsibility. They’re immature. They get goldfish or Nintendo’s or other things that don’t require moments from their precious days of doing nothing.
Equality for women is exactly the same. Let me give an example.
There’s six ways to make a woman shut her fucking mouth — and you can count five of them on your hand.
I’m kidding of course. I would never advocate violence against women. Women are like television sets. They’re fun to watch, and smacking them around rarely improves their malfunction. When they start acting up and getting old on you, it’s just time to get a new one.
The sixth way to get a woman to shut the fuck up is not a joke. Women bitch and moan about equality like a baby whinging for its bottle. What happens when a baby gets its bottle? It shuts the fuck up.
Does that sound radical? Giving a woman equality? Perhaps even a bit mad?
Your man-stincts are correct. Giving women equal of anything is a stupid idea: voting rights, custody, slices of delicious pie. No matter what, you end up with something that isn’t pretty and is about ten to twenty years away from biting you in your man ass.
Think about it for a minute. If women really wanted equality, why dress like whores? And why all the silliness with alimony? Alimony is more objectifying and exploitive than prostitution, porno, and the entire Blackula series combined. All it’s saying is that the only thing women can do in the world is fuck for money. It’s a severance package for retired whores. But I digress.
I said earlier that I would be dispensing the mystical secret that has haunted man since the beginning of time. Not where we’re from or where we’re going, but how to shut women the fuck up. It’s easy. All you have to do is speak to them like equals. For example, what would you say if your very good man friend was drunk or hypnotized into losing Man Points and came up with a comment like, “Kathy at work is such a bitch. I don’t know why she hates me.”
Something immediately springs to mind.
“Who the fuck cares.”
Give the baby her bottle. And silence, my man friends, is golden.
Related Articles:
January 19th, 2006 at 1:48 pm - IP Man-Hash: 645e530646808
Well women get paid less for doing the same job. When women get equal pay, then we should have equal retirement dates. That seems fair.
January 19th, 2006 at 1:51 pm - IP Man-Hash: 3e513170dd78c
Somehow I knew this would come up, women get paid the same as men. This is established fact. Why some women get paid less than men at certain jobs is because they work less hours on average than a man does.
January 19th, 2006 at 1:53 pm - IP Man-Hash: 645e530646808
Thats just not true, it’s still only about 70%. We were doing about it in English.
January 19th, 2006 at 2:15 pm - IP Man-Hash: 3e513170dd78c
Look there are several variables when you want to speak of the wage gap.
1. Experience- Some PEOPLE get paid more to do the same job because they have been doing it longer and presumably do it faster and better than an unexperienced person.
2. Hours- Does the person work part-time or full time? Weekends or not?
3. Type- What kind of work does the person do? I would imagine a concrete worker gets paid more than a day-care provider due to the fact that HE (it’s pretty much a male job) works harder than she does. However if a woman wanted to work concrete, SHE would get paid the same as anyone starting out in that buisness.
In short I seriously doubt that any woman gets paid “less”.
Could you imagine the outrage if some employer said “You know I was going to pay you as much as Mark over there but your a woman, so your going to have to take a pay cut”
Many of these shortfalls are due to HER own choices. By crying discrimination, you don’t really solve the problem, you simply show that you can’t take responsibility for them.
January 20th, 2006 at 4:53 am - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
100% correct Abaddon. Your variables are thorough. I add but two points derived from them.
1. Nicole, consider this little thought experiment. You’ve observed how rapidly corporations have been willing to outsource to India, China, etc. You’ve observed the ruthlessness of the ‘invisible hand’ of late? If companies (and governments) could instantly save 30% of their wage bill by hiring women only, don’t you think they all would? Of course they would!
2. There is a wage gap in women’s favor between childless never-married women and childless never-married men. It’s actually quite substantial. This suggests that women without a man to support them get very concerned about earning money; men without a woman to support don’t care that much. Interesting.
-wolfe
January 20th, 2006 at 1:16 pm - IP Man-Hash: 80450e604e2bd
I would add that just because they teach you something in school doesn’t make it true. Also, if many of these choices are initiated by women, then why do they instinctively blame Men for their own problems? Is it evolution, or simply a learned response? I mean the great joke of this is that we spend so much energy fighting each other that we don’t see the greater enemy. Its like seeing the trees but not the forest.
January 22nd, 2006 at 1:22 pm - IP Man-Hash: 645e530646808
So now you see women as the ‘greater enemy’?!
You’re bordering on delusions.
January 22nd, 2006 at 3:33 pm - IP Man-Hash: ffbb11e7a7ea6
Nicole pull your head out of your ass and READ the post.
Abaddon_fff said:
I would add that just because they teach you something in school doesn’t make it true. Also, if many of these choices are initiated by women, then why do they instinctively blame Men for their own problems? Is it evolution, or simply a learned response? I mean the great joke of this is that we spend so much energy fighting each other that we don’t see the greater enemy. Its like seeing the trees but not the forest.
The greater enemy isn’t women nor is it men, its certain parts of our government.
January 22nd, 2006 at 7:45 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5475964f1d333
Right back at you George. Had you bothered to read the entire thread, you would see that allowing women, if they are married, to retire earllier than their typically older husbands, this is actually discrimination against women in a different way.
Eg.
March 11th, 2006 at 4:44 pm - IP Man-Hash: e3acc5fd1d171
The government advocates a cirriculum that is biased towards females because the school board is primarily made of women. The fact of the matter is, wage varies widely by experience, seniority and performance. A shoddy mechanic does not get paid as much as a qualified, experienced mechanic. Women should try working harder instead of sabotoging each other in the work force. I’ve been witness to hundreds of these acts where women are more prone to office dispute… it’s like 800% more than men or some ridiculous number. Take a lesson from how men perform on the job.
March 11th, 2006 at 4:48 pm - IP Man-Hash: e3acc5fd1d171
He is saying women don’t see themselves as the greater enemy. It’s like a drug addict blaming everyone else but themselves for their problem. Women blame men for their problems because it’s easier to bitch than to do something about it. Then women come together and bitch and agree on it… thus you have a committee. This is where 99% of life’s problems come from. Life will not get easier by complaining about it.
March 11th, 2006 at 4:58 pm - IP Man-Hash: e3acc5fd1d171
Your system works similar to my country (Canada). We have what’s called a compulsary pension plan which is automatically deducted from our income and put into a pension fund which is not available until retirement. Since I won’t be retiring for another 30 or 40 years, it is difficult to tell whether or not there will be any funds for me since the bulk of the baby boomers are going into retirement. It’s a joke, we all know it, because chances are we won’t get it back.
Honestly, I feel bad for people who cannot save enough money in their life and are forced to rely on family to take care of them. We are all losing ground, not just women. The debt-ridden lifestyle is becoming common place and the dream of owning your own home is quickly fading away. Canada has a huge immigration population, especially here in the west where I, being caucasian, am almost a minority. People come here and are willing to do the same job for half the price because they are accustomed to poverty and know how to live cheaply. I’m not advocating racism by any means, but we all really need to focus on the solution, rather than the problem.
March 11th, 2006 at 5:30 pm - IP Man-Hash: dd25bee8154fe
1. Women earn on average 13% less than men
http://www.asic.gov.au/fido/fido.nsf/byheadline/05-50+Are+you+a+super+ woman%3F+ASIC%E2%80%99s+superannuation+tips+for+women?openDocument
http://www.assa.edu.au/policy/papers/2004/intergen.pdf
2. Policy does not address either the social and economic value of women’s unpaid contributions to the social fabric, nor the economic effects of these contributions on the individual woman.
3. Take a greater share of responsibility for child-rearing and are more likely to take on family caregiving and volunteer roles.
4. Earn less money when employed, have broken patterns of employment and as a consequence are less likely to have adequate private superannuation.
5. Are more strongly economically disadvantaged by relationship breakdown.
6. Can expect a longer old age, are more likely than men to live alone in old age, and are more likely to need residential care as they age.
7. Men’s hardware tools are built for men and don’t come with adequate instructions, which is very dangerous.
8. Women’s broken employment, which can be assumed to be due to having/raising children significantly puts her behind the eight ball when it then comes to retirement/super savings.
http://www.business.vic.gov.au/busvicwr/_assets/main/lib60079/wiwchapt er3.pdf
So what is the solution Jarred? Seems to be to not have children, pass GO and collect the money.
March 12th, 2006 at 6:10 am - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
Some years ago, I did the pension calculations for a Canadian friend, based on the CPP (Canada Pension Plan) statements that the Federal Government sent him. He was getting about 3 cents on the dollar (assuming he invested and got a 6 percent return after inflation — aggressive, but not unreasonable if investing for 30-40 years). His wife was getting about 7 cents on the dollar thanks to her (projected) longer lifespan.
In the private sector, managers of pension plans like that would be in jail.
This is a rather interesting point. The high immigration in most countries is to ensure that demography remains stable, since those countries populations aren’t reproducing themselves.
It also serves the point you mentioned: low wages.
Thirdly, if you’ll forgive me for saying so, Canada has not been operated (IMHO) as a modern democracy, but as a weak federation ruled by a brokerage party through much of its modern life. This means that whichever brokerage party is in power has the incentive of leaving the immigration floodgates wide-open to ensure a semi-compliant bloc of voters.
On this last, it will be interesting to see if her new Prime Minister will change any of that. Also, please don’t take my statement as disparaging Canada or Canadians. A fine country, and mostly very fine people. Lousy politics.
This is a rather interesting subject. I think I’ll toss up a discussion in our Politik forums on it. Here’s the placeholder link for it.
Welcome to the boards, Jarod. We’ve got a lot of Canadians and Australians here; always nice to have one more. I hope you’ll check out the forums and have some fun participating in discussions.
-wolfe
March 15th, 2006 at 6:41 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5785f05728620
February 14th, 2007 at 4:32 pm - IP Man-Hash: a2dadaa74aa7e
Most of those whores are poor, and they f*ck to feed themselves and their families.
February 14th, 2007 at 4:34 pm - IP Man-Hash: a2dadaa74aa7e
Well I guess we seem like children, and you the parents, because we expect you to know what to do. Women like decisive men. Men who know what their about.
February 14th, 2007 at 6:58 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5e5ce833b90a9
Telling non-Westerners to fuck-off from the societies we built isn’t racism, it’s reality and survival.
Does China or Japan have constant floods of immigrant workers crushing their middle class? Arabs? No? Because they’re not fucking retards and they plan for the future.
It’s only us and our teddy bear lifestyles and letting females decide policy instead of being men and keeping them in their place. He who let’s children and women rule over him is a failure and won’t live long.
In the end, we have to do something about the parasites who own 99% of the wealth who think foreigners are their soldiers in a demographics war to wipe the caucasion middle class from existance, so they can own 100% of the wealth.
These parasites are cuckolds, sadists, and homosexuals who work in league with feminists and are out to destroy anything that represents Anglo-Saxon Christiandom because they know the European family/spiritual structure is all that stands in the way of their Luciferian ordained right to unlimited power.
The Republicans have about 4 people serious about securing the borders, and the Democrats think a border fence is “racist”.
February 15th, 2007 at 5:06 am - IP Man-Hash: b9f779a6d51d8
Since this got bumped I would like to post that in a Swedish investigation where line of work, employer and such variables were taken into account women earned
February 15th, 2007 at 5:07 am - IP Man-Hash: b9f779a6d51d8
Seems the less than symbol screwed up my post so here’s a repost.
Since this got bumped I would like to post that in a Swedish investigation where line of work, employer and such variables were taken into account women earned less than 2% less than men. Doesn’t seem all that unfair now does it?
The average pay differed alot more though since women more than men chose to work in the public sector and less educated/qualified jobs. Also women are not as good when it comes to negotiating their salary.