Dress For Failure Doesn’t Rhyme
Have you ever heard a woman talk about a man wearing a suit? Good Lord, it’s disgusting. Whenever my man-sense (which is a lot like common sense except hundreds of times more powerful) tells me that the topic is a-brewin, I immediately reach for a pair of galoshes because all of the nearby women are about to commence drooling like savages.
It makes one wonder, if women are so obsessed with how men dress, why do all women dress like complete shit?
Walk down the street and see how many men have dressed poorly for the day. You might find a few teenage men who haven’t quite gotten it figured out yet, but otherwise, you’ll see nothing but impeccable class. You’ll see men wearing business suits and smart-looking blazers maybe; both of which are appropriate for where a man spends most of this day: the workplace. Even the men you see who yield freely and of their own accord to the desire for sustenance, will disguise their bulk like a great and powerful chameleon, by donning the occasional Hawaiian shirt or other ingenuous piece of flair.
This is an art that men have been practicing for thousands of years. Not to impress women, but because men have class. If all we wanted to do was impress women, then we would just walk around naked all the time. That would obviously work. Why do you think women revert to fifth grade giggling over a man wearing a neck tie? I’ll give you a hint. It rhymes with, and also is: the penis.
If I was some kind of alien being and I had to estimate how long women have been dressing themselves based on their appearance on my first visit to Earth, I would have to guess about a week.
First of all, no woman has ever disguised anything about her appearance. They think that everything pertaining to them and who they are is great and brilliant — no matter how disgusting or how much of it there is; and that it should be shoved right in everyone’s face. This is true in absolutely every instance.
Secondly, we all know that the easiest and fastest way possible to get attention is by making a completely catastrophe of yourself.
QED.
Related Articles:
June 1st, 2005 at 8:23 am - IP Man-Hash: 38ae76999b940
So if you hate the way women look then does that make you gay?
You shouldn’t be ashamed to admit it.
June 1st, 2005 at 11:11 am - IP Man-Hash: 272b77d9ce10f
You don’t have to be gay to be a woman hater.
June 1st, 2005 at 4:20 pm - IP Man-Hash: cc0d45fa29251
Hating women and being gay are two totally different things. Besides, there si no evidence of hatred, only good ol’ Man-reason that is obviously too powerful for your little brain’s ability, or lack thereof, to comprehend anything. Nicole, I suggest you find yourself a hobby besides making yourself look like an imbecile. May I suggest learning to dress? Thanks for the comment that had absolutely NOTHING to do with the post.
June 1st, 2005 at 4:21 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7b497fd621575
Again with the gay-bashing, ladies? I must stress that this site does not promote hate-mongering of any kind. I also must confess that as a man, I am extremely disappointed in that sort of behavior. It’s bad form even for a woman.
-Dick in Europe
June 1st, 2005 at 6:34 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5d2199df1a003
Get stuffed you bastard…men like you deserve to be shot. We have been fighting for equatlity for yrs and it is dickheads like you that stop that from happening by demeaning women and making us think we’re not worth shit…well, I’ve realised the only ones who are shit are guyz like you
June 2nd, 2005 at 2:56 am - IP Man-Hash: 38ae76999b940
You misunderstood my point, if you do not like the way women dress but like the way men dress then doesnt that mean you are more atteacted to males.
And I am not a gay basher, I like gays. Theres something nice about talking to a man and knowing hes not just looking at your breasts.
June 2nd, 2005 at 9:16 am - IP Man-Hash: 198450b4642a5
I hate men like you, is another perfect example of why theres no fucking way a woman should be president. As soon as she hits her p.m.s. time keep the missile button away, other wise we’ll be missing a few countries.
June 2nd, 2005 at 11:16 am - IP Man-Hash: 38ae76999b940
You seem to be unable to look at the comments for “women president like no fucking way” where I have included a list of women presidents, who I assure you were not employed to be “eye candy” or to “keep a percentage of women in that particular job”.
So here’s the list again:
Sirimavo Bandaranaike, Sri Lanka Prime Minister, 1960-1965, 1970-1977, 1994-2000.
Indira Gandhi, India Prime Minister, 1966-77, 1980-1984.
Golda Meir, Israel Prime Minister, 1969-1974.
Isabel Peron, Argentina President, 1974-1976
Elisabeth Domitien, Central African Republic Prime Minister, 1975-1976
Margaret Thatcher, Great Britain Prime Minister, 1979-1990.
Maria da Lourdes Pintasilgo, Portugal Prime Minister, 1979-1980.
Lidia Gueiler Tejada, Bolivia Prime Minister, 1979-1980.
Dame Eugenia Charles, Dominica Prime Minister, 1980-1995.
VigdÃs FinnbogadóttÃr, Iceland President, 1980-96.
Gro Harlem Brundtland, Norway Prime Minister, 1981, 1986-1989, 1990-1996.
Soong Ching-Ling, Peoples’ Republic of China Honorary President, 1981.
Milka Planinc, Yugoslavia Federal Prime Minister, 1982-1986.
Agatha Barbara, Malta President, 1982-1987.
Maria Liberia-Peters, Netherlands Antilles Prime Minister, 1984-1986, 1988-1993.
Corazon Aquino, Philippines President, 1986-92.
Benazir Bhutto, Pakistan Prime Minister, 1988-1990, 1993-1996.
Kazimiera Danuta Prunskiena, Lithuania Prime Minister, 1990-91.
Violeta Barrios de Chamorro, Nicaragua Prime Minister, 1990-1996.
Mary Robinson, Ireland President, 1990-1997.
Ertha Pascal Trouillot, Haiti Interim President, 1990-1991.
Sabine Bergmann-Pohl, German Democratic Republic President, 1990.
Khaleda Zia, Bangladesh Prime Minister, 1991-1996.
Edith Cresson, France Prime Minister, 1991-1992.
Hanna Suchocka, Poland Prime Minister, 1992-1993.
Kim Campbell, Canada Prime Minister, 1993.
Sylvie Kinigi, Burundi Prime Minister, 1993-1994.
Agathe Uwilingiyimana, Rwanda Prime Minister, 1993-1994.
Susanne Camelia-Romer, Netherlands Antilles Prime Minister, 1993, 1998-
Tansu Çiller, Turkey Prime Minister, 1993-1995.
Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunge, Sri Lanka Prime Minister, 1994, President, 1994-
Reneta Indzhova, Bulgaria, Interim Prime Minister, 1994-1995.
Claudette Werleigh, Haiti Prime Minister, 1995-1996.
Sheikh Hasina Wajed, Bangladesh Prime Minister, 1996-.
Mary McAleese, Ireland President, 1997-.
Pamela Gordon, Bermuda Prime Minister, 1997-1998.
Janet Jagan, Guyana Prime Minister, 1997, President, 1997-1999.
Jenny Shipley, New Zealand Prime Minister, 1997-1999.
Ruth Dreifuss, Switzerland President, 1999-2000.
Jennifer Smith, Bermuda Prime Minister, 1998-.
Nyam-Osoriyn Tuyaa, Mongolia, Acting Prime Minister, July 1999.
Helen Clark, New Zealand Prime Minister, 1999-.
Mireya Elisa Moscoso de Arias, Panama President, 1999-.
Vaira Vike-Freiberga, Latvia President, 1999-.
Tarja Kaarina Halonen, Finland President, 2000-.
That’s a rather large amount considering Dicks “A women will never be president of America or anywhere else” comment. Hurm, he must have miscounted.
June 2nd, 2005 at 5:57 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5f7691ba137e1
I’ve been perusing this site over the last couple of days and find it a mixture of mild amusement and horrific ignorance. This women president thing really gets me though. Of course there have been women presidents, prime minister, etc. throughout history. That’s a fact that shouldn’t have taken someone twentysomething days to rebut. It’s obvious that the author of this site was speaking to the lack of women in roles that can affect meaningfull global change. The vast majority of the names on the above list are of people from countries that truly wield very little power in the world. This holds true for both men and women in those respective political structures (sorry Iceland). To those who point to Margaret Thatcher, she, like Tony Blair today, was merely the vice president to an American man—in Thatcher’s case Ronald Reagan. I’m sure some of the people on this site who have no interest in examining history (not necessarily one gender) would rather look at titles and not ever examine the lack of power that an office or title may hold. Of course there have been women “presidents.” Citing that the president of the Girl Scouts is a women or the president of N.O.W. is a women is a game of semantics.
Lastly, the open hostility toward homosexuals on this website by many of the women is appalling. Trying to belittle someone by suggesting that they are gay reveals one’s opinion of homosexuals. It seems that the “trump card” for the women on this site to play in an argument is to call the person gay or suggest that they are gay as though this “deficiency” explains one’s “wrong” opinion on a given subject. That is prejudice and that is bullshit. As a gay man in the 21st century, I may be particularly sensitive to this but it’s childish and I wish that the ladies would knock it off. Being gay isn’t a choice; it’s a blessing from God. Learning to argue without resorting to the behavior of a 12 year old may be the deciding factor in showing which gender is better than the other.
June 3rd, 2005 at 2:42 am - IP Man-Hash: 38ae76999b940
So you belive that anyone other than the president of the U.S. has very little power in the world. Why do all americans see themselves as the only ones who matter, women have made a difference by being presidents in many other countries, so why does their contribition not matter just because they are not the president of the U.S.?
As for women hating gays on this site, you obiously did not understand the context of my arguments. I was commenting that if a man did not like a woman appearace then surely he could not be attracted to women and therefore be gay. I have nothing against gays and I have gay friends.
I think you should hear my opinions before commenting that I have the behavior of a 12 year old. Besides its proven that women mature faster than women, so a boy of my age (16) does probably behave like a 12 year old.
So be careful who you are insulting.
June 3rd, 2005 at 3:21 am - IP Man-Hash: 5f7691ba137e1
Nicole,
It’s obvious you have a few issues, most notably an incredible case of egocentrism. I never once cited you as a particular example of anything. The “I have gay friends” line is great though. Heartfelt and informative. And I’m Canadian.
June 3rd, 2005 at 4:02 am - IP Man-Hash: 38ae76999b940
I came onto this website to try to understand why men feel they have to make themselves feel superior to the opposite gender.
I have an open mind as I hope most people do and I certainly did not come on here to attempt to get personal recognition for myself, but to examine all other view points.
And if you are not interested in how women feel about gays on this website then do not bring up the topic yourself.
Your mistaken use of the word “egocentrismâ€? to describe me was probably sparked by the fact that I use the word “I” a lot. This is because I speak for myself; other women have the right to put their own opinions on here rather than me telling them what to think. This is because unlike Dick I do not stereotype women and I accept that we are all different and not all women share my particular believes about equality.
June 11th, 2005 at 12:42 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7c80bffc377e6
No one dresses good these days, women walk around letting their massive globules of fat hang over their exposed g-strings and men try and compete in sports with their pants hanging down at their ankles. Regarding clothing, most women I see only want sex out of it by dressing provocatively, not that it helps them look better or anything.
Elliot, don’t besmear Canada with your bile. You obviously do not know the meaning of egocentricism and give up on the “Im gay, therefore people are being prejudice against me.” Thats like a black man getting upset because someone used the old colloquialism “Thats the pot calling the kettle black”
Blessing from God eh? Lets hear those amazing fundamentalists of the Bible Belt read that one. I don’t have anything against homosexuals, or women, or men, just the individual.
Oh everyone, the PRESIDENT of Finland is a woman, and Finland is doing pretty fine for themselves if I might add, I may even move there to get away from the pile of fuming feces and stillborn fetus goo you people call countries in America.
June 11th, 2005 at 12:45 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7c80bffc377e6
“I must stress that this site does not promote hate-mongering of any kind.”
Since you can’t hear me laughing at this comment: HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
HA HA HAHA…
Dude, at least do a GOOD job of covering your footsteps, if a woman can spin off a terribly manipulative lie, a man who is so obviously better than any woman should be able to do a better job of it.
June 14th, 2005 at 9:37 pm - IP Man-Hash: ac62c77584632
With the way you so frequently rely on vague allusions to your sexual deviancies, it sounds like more than your mind is open for business, Nicole.
Still, congratulations. You’re only 16 and you’ve already realized that a woman is only powerful when she’s being a cocktease.
-Dick
June 15th, 2005 at 6:53 am - IP Man-Hash: 7a87f5eb78641
I am trying to work out how serious you are being, Dick, since you are generating some extreme and crude theories about women. I don’t know if you have been treated badly by women in the past - but even so, you must have a lot of spare time on your hands to construct and manage a website fuelled by your apparent hatred for the opposite sex. I do not consider myself to be a feminist but I do, like any other humane individual, believe in equal rights for men and women - as I can’t see a valid reason as to why men should receive better treatment than women, in any situations.
The reason you may not like the way women dress may be because we have been made to feel that we should dress in ways which we think will please others. If women did not have such enormous pressure to look socially acceptable in men’s usually perverted eyes, then we could wear what we like. I am not saying that all omen hav great fashion sense, as this is simply no true, but with a little guidance all women have the ability to feel comfortable and confident, whilst looking tide and attractive - these are the basic things that matter.
I think it would be fair for me to assume that, no matter what any woman wears, you will never think she looks good enough and wont be able to find it in yourself to respect her, and will probably only ever see her as a sexual object. I think this is very sad, and I can only assume that you must be a very lonely man, in which case you do have my sympathy.
Alison
June 16th, 2005 at 3:24 pm - IP Man-Hash: e420dbb177d6e
You know I once heard that people like each other for their qualities but love each other for their faults. That is so true, all the cute little ‘annoying’ things people do are what make them different to everyone else, if no one had flaws then we would all be the same.
I feel pity for the men on this website because you have never loved a woman, and that is the best feeling in the world. Dick, if you are ever in love then you will be capable of not only accepting a woman’s flaws but loving her for them, and her loving you for yours. Then perhaps you will understand, that yes women have flaws (we are only human after all) but we have no more faults than men. Perhaps if you can learn to accept one woman, you will be able to accept us all.
By the way sorry for coming on this website even though technically I’m not supposed to. I have this need to at least attempt to help others; it’s the emotion that compels me to tell smokers they will get cancer (I’m sure it will get me beaten up one day). Well that’s all I have to say really, I hope you’ll pay some attention to me even though I have a different opinion to you, and even if you don’t at least I tried. Thanks.
January 8th, 2006 at 5:54 am - IP Man-Hash: 9de5719a90e10
Being gay isn’t a choice; it’s a blessing from God.
I don’t have a problem with people being gay, it IS their choice, but this statement really got to me and know one ever seems to remember the verses and teachings of the bible or even mentions much about God…if you are close to God and know Him and have read the bible, being gay is not a blessing from Him. In fact sir, it is wrong and sinful in the eyes of the beholder…when God made man, he made man and woman, let me repeat…MAN AND WOMAN. As quoted for many years, God made Adam and Eve, NOT Adam and Steve. Read the bible and know God before you say that it’s a blessing from God. I’m not here to judge you or what this individual has posted about women, or anybody else for that matter, it’s not my place…that’s for God to do when He comes for us on judgment day. God bless
January 8th, 2006 at 6:08 am - IP Man-Hash: 9de5719a90e10
My comment was for Elliot towards the end of his paragraph.
January 8th, 2006 at 11:38 am - IP Man-Hash: 4b4786e0d7232
No one cares who your comment was for, Sarah. No one cares what you have to say.
-Dick
January 8th, 2006 at 1:17 pm - IP Man-Hash: a0e5cbab12160
1.) Nicole’s idea that being in love is about loving someone for their flaws seems like bullshit to me. . . I’ve heard this idea a million times, and I never really thought about it until recently. Think about the idea though…. you love someone for their flaws? Women had to think this one up, probably as a way to further reduce the amount of effort they have to put into a relationship. I’m guessing that the “flaws” men are supposed to “be in love with” include massive weight gains, clinginess, and immaturity. . . character flaws held by women. Men, of course, are still supposed to be perfect. . . I’ve never heard any woman say that she loves the way her man beats the hell out of her… but anger management problems are a flaw, right? Shouldn’t you be in love with them?
Love, if it actually exists, should be about appreciating someone’s good qualities, not their weaknesses. Loving someone for their flaws may sound nice on a Hallmark card, but it’s bullshit in real life.
2.) Sarah - It seems pretty obvious that the smartest thing to ever come out of your mouth was a penis. If God created everything in the universe, including all mankind, then he surely DID create Adam and Steve (and Bobby and Sally and Dick and Jane, etc. etc. etc.). . . more over, God must have liked the idea of homosexuality; after all, he wouldn’t even fuck Mary to conceive Jesus! What a classic move… knock up some random broad and leave her chump boyfriend with the bills for the kid! That’s God, the original deadbeat dad.
You should read the Bible a little better yourself, before coming to testify to the world. Jesus said something along the lines of “judge not, lest ye be judged.” He also spent his days hanging out with hookers and con men… not judging them and berating them, but showing them love and acceptance. You should do the same, in my opinion.
January 9th, 2006 at 12:38 am - IP Man-Hash: 9de5719a90e10
Obviously what I wrote bothers you, or you know it’s the truth and can’t handle that…or the word of God scares you…and that’s fine…you should be…most people in the wrong are defensive anyway so on that note, i don’t care if you like what i had to say or not or anyone else…you can agree or disagree…makes no difference to me.
January 9th, 2006 at 12:46 am - IP Man-Hash: 539beebcc83dd
If it’s so obvious, make up your fucking mind. Of that’s right. You’re a woman. You can’t.
-Dick
January 9th, 2006 at 1:08 am - IP Man-Hash: 9de5719a90e10
Yes, my husbands penis as a matter of fact is the best thing that has come out of my mouth…so what’s your point…don’t talk to me about judging when you don’t even know who I am and making that ridiculous and immature remark.
Yeah, Jesus and God love you regardless of our choices on this earth, very true, but it’s us as individuals to know and learn from right and wrong and come to terms with God and learn from God and Jesus’ teachings. Obviously you haven’t read much of the bible either so if you’re going to assume that I lack His teachings you’re right up there with me bubba. Like I said in my first post on here…I”m not judging anyone here just stating the truth, which most people in wrong or know it’s wrong will attack with rudeness but I am praying for rude people like yourself, Dick and whoever else has…like i said…I have no problem with gays…and I have read the bible thank you and do go to church and am close to God. I also like how you stated to this person “SEAN”…”love, if it actually exists”….um…yeah…it sure does, but it’s humanity that drowns it out. Kinda of funny you mention this but tell me to read the bible a little better….
January 9th, 2006 at 1:18 am - IP Man-Hash: 9de5719a90e10
LOL….oh you’re too funny…if you’re out there in the world and talk to both men and women…you’ll notice that men can’t make up their minds just as much as women…you sure are out there bud. Do you even have a woman in your life…cause I pitty any respectable lady to crosses your path…
January 9th, 2006 at 2:32 am - IP Man-Hash: 9de5719a90e10
Oh wait wait wait wait wait…it’s all starting to come clear to me now…I see why this “Dick Masterbationson” fellow is outraged when it comes to women….or the rest of you cry babies for that matter….it’s because he can’t get one! Or better yet…”Dick” must suffer from infant dick syndrome…AAAAHHH HA HA! AAAAAHHH HA HA!!!….Ok…hold on, got pick myself up off the floor…no…..wait………AAAAAHHHHH HAAAA HAAAA….HEHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE! That’s funny right there, I don’t care who you are! HAVE A NICE DAY, DRIVE THRU!
January 9th, 2006 at 3:22 am - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
Oh my, Sarah.
First of all, welcome to the boards. Congratulations on your reading comprehension. I disassociate myself from the penis out of mouth comment, and I apologize for it. That said…
You seem pretty Old Testament in your interpretation of the Bible. That’s cool, but it’s not what I’d call Christian. Indeed, by definition it’s unChristian. Christ didn’t have a whole lot of time for enumerating the sins of gays. Indeed, he had none. Now if you want to take the Old Testament literally, then yep, God’s pretty hard-core anti-gay. Unfortunately for you He’s also hard-core pro-slavery, pro-rape, and hard-core anti-pork, shrimp, lobster, etc. (You’ve never had bacon in your life, have you?).
I’m also a Christian, Sarah.
Even bigger surprise. I’m not gay, and I think that gays are messed up and hosed, in a sad way.
That said, they are God’s children, and He did indeed make them that way. Either God is capricious and nasty, or lacks control, or… lets us choose. I prefer the third option. I don’t much like it, and don’t totally understand it, but I greatly prefer it to the others.
I genuinely believe you are misinterpreting this site, Sarah.
-wolfe
January 9th, 2006 at 4:07 am - IP Man-Hash: dd1b911ab43ac
Sarah, Dick gets his cheap thrills from fighting with women on this site. It won’t matter what you say to get him to change his attitude, cause he simply won’t. Consider saving yourself the bother and aggravation.
January 9th, 2006 at 4:56 am - IP Man-Hash: 35bb10d1ae03c
Ok, who win the bet on this one.
The penis joke seems to be part of the “wimmin” armor as their concept of some type of insult.
So predictable and so boring.
beat it Female ver.3
January 9th, 2006 at 5:32 am - IP Man-Hash: dd1b911ab43ac
I’m not gay either but I have gay friends and they definately don’t choose to be gay. There is a theory, based on a longitudinal study, that during the 3rd? trimester of pregnancy, when the foetus’s sexual organs are forming, an abnormal amount of sex hormones secreted, correlates with those children later preferring their own sex, sexually. If I find the study, I’ll post the link. It’s possibly been discredited, or further research may have been done since (this is going back nearly 10 years).
And CJ, there is only one of me, stop being paranoid.
January 9th, 2006 at 10:02 am - IP Man-Hash: 539beebcc83dd
If it’s been discredited, then it’s no longer a study, dumb fuck.
-Dick
January 9th, 2006 at 8:09 pm - IP Man-Hash: 957564b4aff6d
Female,
You will find that a very large percentage of people that choose same-sex relationships were sexually molested as children. So far, there is no hard evidence to suggest that homosexuality is indeed something one is born with. Even if they are born with it, it should be classified as an unhealthy abnormality.
The ’study’ you mentioned above should not even qualify as such, as it is only a theory which is not even based on verifiable facts.
January 9th, 2006 at 9:32 pm - IP Man-Hash: 252cfbc0f9506
It’s not a study at all. It’s just Female talking out her fat ass like usual. A study is done by doctors and scientists, not summed up by some crazed masochist.
-Dick
January 9th, 2006 at 11:58 pm - IP Man-Hash: 05876c7260a2f
You’re both bigots. But we already knew that.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_hormones_and_sexual_orientation
http://www.webmd.com/content/article/22/1728_56075?src=Inktomi&conditi on=Home%20&%20Top%20Stories
http://www.anthropogeny.com/Etiology%20of%20Male%20Homosexuality%20and %20Current%20Rise%20of%20Male%20Homo.htm
I guess you’ll just have to pray that your own offspring are heterosexual.
January 10th, 2006 at 12:52 am - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
On homosexuality and choice (at least this is more pertinent to this site than astrology, though only just), without a doubt there are people who “choose” to be gay (the studies Arielle cites are correct). There are people who choose to be promiscuous (hetero or homo). There are people who choose to practice bisexuality (that’s the ultimate in obvious choice), and there are people who choose to be straight.
That said, are there people who are not abused who appear to be strongly oriented towards homosexuality? Yes, some. Like you, I know a few.
Are they otherwise sensible and sane? Yep. Therefore, does it make sense to have homosexuality declared as a disorder/unhealthy abnormality as Arielle suggests? Probably not. (Sorry Arielle, though I do agree promiscuous homosexuality should be classified as a disorder — mind you ditto promiscuous heterosexuality, but the former appears far, far worse at least in terms of epidemiology without reference to morality).
Personally, I don’t much care what orientation an individual is; I do care that they don’t sleep around promiscuously spreading diseases. Speaking of the great mass of population (not individuals), I’d like most people to be heterosexual, because… guess what… that means we get to survive as the human race! I also believe that the opposites that are men and women — yin and yang — balance one another far more beautifully than yin and yin or yang and yang. The latter two are but a pale shadow of the beauty of a heterosexual relationship, and it’s a shame that some people should be denied that beauty for whatever reason.
-wolfe
January 10th, 2006 at 1:32 am - IP Man-Hash: 05876c7260a2f
I like your post, wolfe.
January 10th, 2006 at 1:49 am - IP Man-Hash: 05876c7260a2f
My ass isn’t fat, dumbass. Don’t you have cows to go and milk or something?
January 10th, 2006 at 1:54 am - IP Man-Hash: 6c7a119d3fc86
By the way, so everyone knows, I have now tried twice to post links of 3 studies regarding the theory I mentioned. Doesn’t work, link button is broken and should be removed, but so be it.
If anyone gives a care, put Prenatal hormones and sexual orientation into Wikipedia.
January 10th, 2006 at 3:09 am - IP Man-Hash: 9de5719a90e10
Ok, who win the bet on this one.
The penis joke seems to be part of the “wimmin” armor as their concept of some type of insult.
So predictable and so boring.
beat it Female ver.3
Yes sweetheart, the “wimmin armour” must be quite an old and boring statement for most men when it’s said or directed towards them isn’t it? So sorry…must be a lot of women directing this towards you huh…tisk tisk….too bad so sad.
January 10th, 2006 at 3:34 am - IP Man-Hash: 9de5719a90e10
January 10th, 2006 at 3:58 am - IP Man-Hash: 9de5719a90e10
I know hon…sometimes these fools need to be put into their place though and yeah, it’s not mature on my part and I’m dropping myself to their level…but you get what you give sometimes ya know? Take care and God bless.
January 10th, 2006 at 4:12 am - IP Man-Hash: b51f30d97b8ea
1. No matter how low you set the floor of expectations for a woman, she will inevitably fall below it.
2. When losing an argument with a man, a woman will inevitably bring up at least one of a man’s putative: a) homosexuality, b) small penis size, c) lack of a woman, d) unattractiveness to women, e) cheating with other women. The fact that many of those assertions are logically impossible when combined will not prevent a woman from doing so.
3. A woman exists in the now. As such, to her, actions have no predictable consequences and words mean whatever she wishes them to mean at the moment.
Masterson’s First Corollary: Women’s memories last until they go to sleep. If a woman ever admits that she is wrong or that she will stop behaving atrociously she will awaken to a blank slate of denial and malice.
Wolfe’s Second Corollary: The good-will generated by deeds that impress a woman positively has a very short half-life.
January 10th, 2006 at 8:52 pm - IP Man-Hash: 2afdb477a0884
Nicole said:
I think you should hear my opinions before commenting that I have the behavior of a 12 year old. Besides its proven that women mature faster than women, so a boy of my age (16) does probably behave like a 12 year old.
So be careful who you are insulting.
This old line again, lets reiterate shall we. Women mature PHYSICALLY faster than men, mentally their processes are similar. However, I have met people that are still living in their high school days @ 40 years old. One cannot measure maturity, nor wisdom for these things are earned through EXPERIENCE. I would be the first to posit that MAYBE women mature faster, however they stop maturing earlier, and that one of the reasons men take so long to mature, is the fact that they mature MORESO than women in effect that would take more time. Also I do think that you have the intellectual capacity of a 12 year old.
January 10th, 2006 at 9:01 pm - IP Man-Hash: 2afdb477a0884
Nicole said:
You know I once heard that people like each other for their qualities but love each other for their faults. That is so true, all the cute little ‘annoying’ things people do are what make them different to everyone else, if no one had flaws then we would all be the same.
-Nicole, you love someone for who they are, both good and bad, but you ACCEPT their faults if you can and move on together.
I feel pity for the men on this website because you have never loved a woman, and that is the best feeling in the world. Dick, if you are ever in love then you will be capable of not only accepting a woman’s flaws but loving her for them, and her loving you for yours. Then perhaps you will understand, that yes women have flaws (we are only human after all) but we have no more faults than men. Perhaps if you can learn to accept one woman, you will be able to accept us all.
-Your thinking is flawed, I like this website not because I am a lonely man, nor because I hate women, I like it because it is funny and thought provoking. Also, if you have ever visited and feminist websites, they are by far more hateful then this site and definitely not as funny. Men and Women are each individuals and have specific characteristics, some could be described as faults, others good.
January 11th, 2006 at 5:39 am - IP Man-Hash: 9de5719a90e10