Women Feel Sorry For Rapists
Women involved in any level of government other than putting the spun gold that comes out of men’s mouths onto paper or making the fucking coffee is a blueprint to disaster. Not a disaster like being two hours late to a party because you took the wrong freeway and then hit a watermelon truck because your wife can’t read directions either. This is a disaster like burning sulfur raining from the sky or lava shooting all the fuck over the place. That’s a biblical manner of shit.
Women with any kind of power means civilization is about to be proper fucked. That’s the battle we fight as men, constantly pulling the human race back from the edge of nothing with one hand tied behind our backs because we’re goddamn men and that’s how we do everything: easily.
Women feel sorry for themselves all the time. I mean all the time too. If a woman isn’t having fun somewhere fun like an awesome Nicolas Cage movie or doing a shitty job playing with a Frisbee at the beach, it’s because she’s fucking feeling sorry for herself again. Boo-hoo.
Women feel sorry for you too. Even if you’re filthy rich and for some reason you can fly you just don’t tell anyone about it — every woman out there feels sorry for you and hates the fuck out of you. Oh no. I’m still not done.
Women also feel sorry for puppies and kittens and little baby seals with their priceless little hides of fur and their cold little flippers. Think that’s stupid? Yes you do because you’re a man, but I’m just getting warmed up. Women also feel sorry for diet sodas and imitation Oreo cookies. “Does anyone really love diet sodas for diet sodas?” Women say. “Do they love diet soda because of its taste or in spite of it?”
Neither, you dumb broad! It’s diet fucking soda.
Women feel sorry for worn out T-shirts and washing machines that need to be replaced. They feel sorry for broken down cars that get traded in and old pairs of scissors that get lent to a child and then are never seen again. They feel sorry for fucking rocks and sticks and smudges on tissues. Women wallow in sorrow every day of their fucking lives, but here’s the one that won’t surprise you because you’re a man, but will make you chuckle.
Women feel sorry for rapists.
Yes, lets all have a good laugh at the implausibility of it.
Some brilliant man-scientists just performed a study which concluded the following:
When people who deserve it get what’s coming to them, men’s brains function as men’s brains do: 100% perfectly. Women’s brains, however, are donkey shit.
In a closed game system, women’s brains lit up with empathy like slot machines when a deserving party was administered a mild electric shock. Men’s brains lit up with glee — man-glee, which means that someone somewhere was getting the job done right.
By extension, we can assume women have zero concept of justice and therefore are the E-coli of a healthy civilization. We can assume that, but as men we should just go on our mighty man-stincts in the first place, which say the following:
Women are coddling know-nothings who can stop a buck about as well as they can hold one.
What a joke.
I could make this shit up, but why?
Related Articles:
March 24th, 2006 at 4:09 am - IP Man-Hash: 34e3b10c32441
Once again we are informed of the bleeding obvious, must be because the politically correct cretins are loosing control of the media.
I can remember one female saying that “women are ready for rape”, this may sound different to what we have been trained to think but it’s interesting that it was a comment made by a female.
We are not takling about violence, we are talikg about dominating a females body.
Gotta to bear in mind two things.
1. Feminazies have been glorifying this and receiving billions because of it. stigmatize it incorrectly.
2. Women fantasize about it. Any women that you and I have any experience with have responded at the height of sexual exstasy with it.
and never complained otherwise. Why is it such a drama now……
Feminism, lesbian bitches jealous that we were turning their bait on.
March 24th, 2006 at 7:45 am - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
I’m not so sure women feel sorry for rapists, Dick. In my experience women seem to have a switch in their heads that is hard-wired to two modes:
1. Irrational excessive empathy;
2. Irrational insane vindictiveness with zero targetting ability.
Men of course have two modes as well:
a. Justice should prevail;
b. Dirty Harry mode. (Justice must prevail right NOW).
The great Reason article you pointed to demonstrated mode 1 (and a), but we’ve all seen mode 2 plenty of times, right men? Unfortunately there seems to be no mode 3.
There seems to be no middle ground for women — no mode “a”. I suspect most women switch to position (2) when it comes to rapists, and woe betide anyone around those women.
-wolfe
March 24th, 2006 at 11:22 am - IP Man-Hash: f3ae1ac46a2e3
I pose merely that women cannot turn off their empathy. Ever.
-Dick
March 24th, 2006 at 4:51 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5475964f1d333
Feel sorry for rapists? Yea right.
I read that article a couple of months ago and can’t be bothered right now to read it again, but let me posit a guess as to why their brain’s have been assumed to light up with empathy….they took a millionth of a thousandth of a second to imagine being raped and that is where the empathy was directed - not to the rapist, as assumed. Or, they empathised with being raped, then imagined rapist in jail being anally raped by other perps and reacted with horror to the thought of ever finding themselves in such a position - and that is where the “empathy” was focussed. Actual empathy for rapists? Don’t make me laugh. Oh wait, you’d never be able to do that anyway, what was I thinking.
All rapists require castration, and, as the act of rape itself is about the need to feel powerful over another rather, than pleasure from sex per se, all means to strip power from such perps should also be enacted.
March 24th, 2006 at 4:55 pm - IP Man-Hash: f3ae1ac46a2e3
Why would they imagine being raped? The experiment had nothing to do with rape.
-Dick
March 24th, 2006 at 5:23 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7f5a0b2070dae
“the act of rape itself is about the need to feel powerful over another rather, than pleasure from sex per se,”
lol. I thought you didn’t like stupid stereotypes. Let me ‘posit a guess’ by saying that you have absolutely no bleepin’ idea what motivates a rapist. You’re just parroting what other people have told you.
March 24th, 2006 at 5:27 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5475964f1d333
No Grump, I have actually looked at the sociological and psychological literature on rape. Shock, horror.
March 24th, 2006 at 6:23 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5475964f1d333
parrotting what other’s have told me? Like what you did when you tried to convince me that in Canada they kill breathing newborns as a form of post-partum abortion, provided the umbilical cord is uncut and presumably the placenta is still inside the mother?
If you can figure out google, it shouldn’t take more than 0.3 seconds to find thousands of articles backing up what I have just said. Have fun.
March 24th, 2006 at 6:41 pm - IP Man-Hash: d190ee8325b21
Killing newborns does not count as abortion, Fem.
-Dick
March 24th, 2006 at 7:39 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7f5a0b2070dae
Fem, I make it a habit not to give you the benefit of the doubt. It seems good policy from where I’m sitting.
As always, though, I’m happy to correct myself. You, though, will never budge when your logical inconsistency is exposed. I’d either have to believe that you are an idiot, or an idiot on purpose. I think you are the latter.
“I have actually looked at the sociological and psychological literature on rape.”
So, you have parroted what others have told you. Not all the literature agree female.
Do you really believe ALL rapists are alike in motivation? Is that what the sociological and psychological literature demonstrates? I doubt it, since that would be a ’stupid stereotype’, right female?
Anyways, check this out. This site has at least five theories on the subject of what motivates rapists. It’s a Harvard site if that lends any credibility to you.
March 24th, 2006 at 8:11 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5475964f1d333
Grump, none of those theorists refute evidence from rapist self-reports that it about control and power over women.
Stating that it is an outcome of a disadvantaged background; social learning or hormones does not refute that fact that it is what it is and that is violence linked to a desire to dominate, subjugate and violate.
Unintelligent and insecure men who think that the only they can get power is through stealing it from another.
March 24th, 2006 at 8:22 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7f5a0b2070dae
Wendy McElroy has some interesting comments on the subject of rape and radical feminism.
March 24th, 2006 at 8:25 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7f5a0b2070dae
“rapist self-reports that it about control and power over women. ”
So, you can say for *SURE* that *EVERY* rapist is motivated by these factors?
March 24th, 2006 at 8:48 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5475964f1d333
You really need to stop trying to twist my words and how many times do I need to tell you that I am not a feminist. So be it, that article said it is not a violent act about power over one women and instead, it is a violent act against all women. She obviously likes to draw distinctions. In my mind, a rapist doesn’t care about the individual women, nor women in general, so I see it as both.
Rapists also don’t chose the women they rape based on the man or woman’s looks. It comes down to vulnerability and opportunity. Who looks weak and whether they are alone. I have heard a woman’s voice screaming down the phone while while she was facing a man who had just broken into her apartment and who subsequently raped her. If you don’t believe this is about power, then perhaps you should speak to a woman who has been raped.
March 24th, 2006 at 9:13 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7f5a0b2070dae
“rapist self-reports that it about control and power over women. ”
Female, I just have a hard time believing that all rapists are the same. I tend to believe that there must be a bias in the literature you have read for it to come out so resoundingly in the direction that you think it does.
Look at this, from the correctional service of canada:
Knight and Prentky (1991) constructed a separate classification system for rapists. ..In this taxonomy, offenders are first categorized according to the primary motivation for the commission of the offence(s): opportunistic, pervasively angry, vindictive, or sexual.
Opportunistic Type: motivated by the desire for immediate sexual gratification.
Pervasively anger type: Not just with women
Vindictive type: Motivated by a anger at women. Desire to degrade and humiliate them.
Sexual type: Sexual *or* Sadistic fantasies
March 24th, 2006 at 9:22 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7f5a0b2070dae
This is also a good site. Scroll down a little to get info on rapes:
http://www.courttv.com/onair/shows/profiler/column_05.html
Now, next time, female - remember not to accuse me of making stupid stereotypes unless you are certain that you don’t make them yourself.
Now that I have thoroughly demolished female…I shall leave.
March 24th, 2006 at 9:27 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5475964f1d333
Yeah, that completely changes everything I said. Not.
Golf clap.
March 24th, 2006 at 9:40 pm - IP Man-Hash: d190ee8325b21
I’ve said it once and I’ll say it again. Female is the dumbest bitch on the internet.
-Dick
March 25th, 2006 at 8:54 am - IP Man-Hash: 33fcf4d0fa775
Back at the top, I don’t think it would be about some chick thinking about being raped as some guy gets some voltage zapped through his body. I think women just can’t stand to see “anything” in pain. I would post a lot of sites etc, but, I don’t feel like it.
Don’t get me wrong, I don’t tolerate rape, at all. If I EVER saw a women getting raped, I’d have to kick me some serious man-ass. But since the topic was such, and knowing the people I know, I think it stems from that basic belief, if it is hurting, it is wrong, no matter what. It ruins the “my little pony” lifestyle women like to try and live in. Close your eyes, turn your head, and go back to the happy place.
March 25th, 2006 at 12:39 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7f5a0b2070dae
Female, there’s such a thing as ‘common sense’. I know that that concept is completely lost on you, though, hence your continual presence here at this site.
“You really need to stop trying to twist my words”
I’m not. You claim that rape is about feeling powerful over women. I disagree. Commodification and biology theory cancels that idea out.
“and how many times do I need to tell you that I am not a feminist.”
I didn’t call you a feminist.
“that article said it is not a violent act about power over one women and instead, it is a violent act against all women”
We haven’t been reading the same article, female, or you conveniently read the parts that appealed to your preconceived ideas.
“Yeah, that completely changes everything I said.”
Yes, it did.
Is this some sort of sacred cow for you?
March 25th, 2006 at 1:42 pm - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
Shrug. She corrected her own error, and she was very close to the truth. I myself thought she was correct based on my [accurate, but limited] memory of the relevant section of the criminal code. The fact remains that you can perform ultra-late term abortions in Canada.
And one can find thousands of articles claiming that Kerry is smarter than Bush, or that Marxism works, or that Paula Abdul is intelligent and can sing.
Kelley Blanchette’s review (which Grump cites) presents a more accurate analysis of rapists than the uni-dimensional view that you do. You’ll also be delighted to know that she talks about castration in considerable detail. Enjoy.
-wolfe
March 26th, 2006 at 7:40 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5475964f1d333
Oh I see, you don’t think they should be castrated? What do you suggest then mmmm? Maybe a widdle slap on the wrist? That sounds like a prevention strategy destined for inevitable success.
March 26th, 2006 at 7:59 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5475964f1d333
Really. Speaking from experience as a rapist are you?
This answers the question of exactly how far removed a misogynist is from being a rapist. The answer, not very f*cking far at all.
March 27th, 2006 at 5:58 am - IP Man-Hash: 7f5a0b2070dae
Female: blah blah blah
March 27th, 2006 at 8:13 am - IP Man-Hash: 334639ef4249f
Actually, social psychologists have theorized that if you provide insufficient punishment, the receiver (In this case, the rapist) of the punishment will experience dissonance because the rapist has not experienced complete justification. The less severe you make the threat, the less external justification there is; the less external justification, the greater the need for internal justification. The rapist can reduce his (or her, since woman rape, too) dissonance by convincing himself that he does not want to rape. It is predicted that by allowing leeway to construct their own internal justification enables them to develop a permanent set of values.
March 27th, 2006 at 3:02 pm - IP Man-Hash: ee94550bfe94c
Now that has got to be the dumbest thing I have ever read. If this wasn’t such a serious issue I’d be doubled over laughing.
March 27th, 2006 at 7:50 pm - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
Castration is certainly tempting as a punishment. But, because I’m a man, I’m capable of viewing a range of sanctions between castration and a ‘widdle’ slap on the wrist.
Female, why do you do this? You know my views are pretty harsh on crime, probably harsher on criminals than yours are. You know I’ve nothing but contempt for rapists and men who genuinely abuse [no, saying "you can't buy that dress" is NOT abuse] women.
You seem to like argument for argument’s sake, and you do it very badly.
-wolfe
PS: I sure hope Jordan is a woman, because I agree with you that that’s the dumbest thing I’ve heard all week, except for the women being rapists. That’s definitely true. See the ghastly sexual molestation cases by female teachers unfolding in the US.
The idea that nutter rapists will “develop a permanent set of values” that we like by not being punished ignores the fact that they already have done so. And those values are “Rape is A-OK”.
-w
March 27th, 2006 at 10:34 pm - IP Man-Hash: dec2907738527
Well it seemed to me wolfe that you were implying that castration should not be an option and that you believed I gain some kind of titillation from the thought of it. As per this;
Rude. For what reason? What point were you trying to make by saying that?
I am not a fan of Mrs Bobbitt’s.
Unless you are a rapist.
March 28th, 2006 at 2:23 am - IP Man-Hash: 34e3b10c32441
If male rapist are to be castrated then women rapist will have their genitals mutilated, just to even the punishment.
No different treatment for women, equal opportunity.
March 28th, 2006 at 6:39 am - IP Man-Hash: cb99b69c1d558
According to a nine-year study conducted by former Purdue sociologist Eugene J. Kanin, in over 40 percent of the cases reviewed, the complainants eventually admitted that no rape had occurred (Archives of Sexual Behavior, Vol. 23, No. 1, 1994). Kanin also studied rape allegations in two large Midwestern universities and found that 50 percent of the allegations were recanted by the accuser. See my previous post with references at http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/rape-device-in-africa-feminism#co mment-3052
So what does Fem think should happen to the 40-50% of accused rapists who aren’t rapists? Should they get their balls back?
Women’s brains are indeed, as Dick points out, donkey shit. However, their need for alibis for adultery means women will continue to falsely accuse men of rape.
It’s normal behaviour for a woman. Like voting for Hitler, sucking at computers or being a cheating whore.
-Big Al
March 28th, 2006 at 10:40 am - IP Man-Hash: f3ae1ac46a2e3
Big Al, that could be said for a lot of solutions women pose to problems. Like how so many more women attempt suicide — a stupid fix to their easily fixable and temporary problems.
-Dick
March 28th, 2006 at 2:58 pm - IP Man-Hash: 4ef98ac959c71
This is a classic study in cognitive dissonance, displaying that having little external justification results in attitude adjustment.
March 28th, 2006 at 5:16 pm - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
Bozhe moi!
First, thanks for the link to the study, Jordan. Welcome to the site. If you’re a man (or a woman), I did not mean for my comments above to offend you, but I do disagree vehemently with what you say.
Look, the studies you link to and all your arguments have one thing in common: people have a certain mental picture of themselves and the people and world around them. You argue that when cognitive dissonance arises between two beliefs — or a belief and an action — that it will be resolved, often with a behavioral or attitudinal adjustment.
That’s a fair argument, but many many men who rape (and I mean rape here, not “date rape” or the woman changing her mind) are scumbag psychopaths (or borderline, or narcissistic). Their self-image (and that of the people and world around them) is pretty irrational (though seems fine to them) and not subject to normal rational rules, including cognitive dissonance.
They have no problem with seeing themselves as above the law or beyond the law, and laughing at it especially if its punishments are weak.
Indeed, if they actually genuinely viewed rape as a bad thing, the first study you cite might suggest that a light punishment (low price) for rape might well make them more likely to rape as it might cause them to start to believe rape is good!
Sorry, Jordan, I appreciate your arguments, but I don’t find them remotely persuasive.
As I say though, male or female, welcome to the site. Hope you find much of interest here.
Best,
-wolfe
September 7th, 2006 at 7:03 am - IP Man-Hash: bad0aada6ab38
We wish you would double over.
September 7th, 2006 at 7:12 am - IP Man-Hash: bad0aada6ab38
Female and most women don’t want to be associated with the nutters of Now and the rest of the feminuts but they still carry the virus which is spread through feminsim.
If it walks like a duck and smells like duck then lets shoot that fucking duck!
September 7th, 2006 at 7:16 am - IP Man-Hash: bad0aada6ab38
This article makes good sense. Women flock to prisons trying to catch a mate who has murdered or raped.
They just don’t make sense.
We wouldn’t have all those hardened inmates if it weren’t for women and the other liberal cry babies.
A 22 caliber round through the head cost about 10 cents.
That would save tax payers trillions of dollars.
September 7th, 2006 at 8:19 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Wow. Castration for allegations of rape indeed.
Good God, woman, would you hand them their balls back if proven innocent post castrare?
Of course, a woman that’s been raped is much worse off than a castrated man in need for anal reconstruction. I mean, it’s not like genitals in adult humans are actually meant for intercourse or that it’s anything more than a useless appendage that shrinks in the pool.
And women would never ever lie about such a grievous offence as a rape charge, would they? La donna é mobile. Today was consensual, tomorrow it’ll have been rape, what ever tickles her fancy at the moment.
Oh, and a reality check. The urge to reproduce (mate) is the single most powerful and deepest ingrained instinct of living things on the face of the Earth. At least the males of various species, anyway.
Of course it’s up to the men to ensure propagation of the human species. Like everything that men have traditionally always had to grapple with, it turns into a massive clusterfuck of catastrophic failure when women attempt it. If it had been up to women’s libido we’d have gone extinct by the time Eve reached menopause.
Fine, castrate men charged with rape. Neuter women proven to have lied in their testimony as well.
And do be unbiased and objectively circumspect about allegations more than 24 hours late or those that can’t be corroborated by the results of a forensic gynecologist examination.
September 7th, 2006 at 9:56 am - IP Man-Hash: 356b2e2244d02
Women exist only in the now. They never think or plan that far ahead.
After all, for centuries women have been hopelessly dependant on men to do all the major thinking for them.
As far as what constitutes rape, where do you draw the line? What if (however unlikely) a woman was raped with an inanimate object, such as a dildo? Technically that doesn’t count as penetration. Does that deserve castration?
What of female teachers who have been known to abuse their (often well underage) students? Would you propose that they have their ovaries removed, Fem?
I somehow doubt it.
September 7th, 2006 at 10:38 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Such a spiteful, hateful creature you are, Female. Guess to be expected of a woman.
I see your inane proposal for enacting legislation to castrate convicted rapists, even though they might not really be that and the punishment is grossly inadequate and cruel for the crime.
And raise you my own sane, level headed wise proposal for legislation. Neutering after third abortion not performed for medical reasons. That’s at least as fair and humane as your inept, idiotic crapper of an idea.
Crazy bitch.
September 7th, 2006 at 11:25 am - IP Man-Hash: d2bf73bae8061
Keep in mind, this is the reaction of women VIEWING a rapist being tortured. This study concludes that such a sight will stir empathy in women where it won’t in men. Both genders can easily agree rapists must be punished, the women in the study probably intellectually believe such a punishment is just. The only different is that they would be moved more than men by the greusome sight of it.
September 7th, 2006 at 12:02 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
I see an analogy with Asimov 3 robot laws. Is action that results in the death of one better than inaction that results in the death of 5?
Perhaps one should settle upon a weight ratio. That is to say how much worse should a life curtailed through action be than that same life cut short due to inaction.
Of course this rationale is simplistic. It does not take into account other factors that might prove of relevance or cause bias in the person assessing the moral dilemma: respective individual age, gender, appearance, how long does the person that will die as result of action have to live if action is undertaken and how long the one that will die through inaction has if nothing is done, etc. Assuming perfect strangers, naturally.
All these factors would naturally need afferent weight (significance) ratios, both absolute and relative to one another, in order to properly gauge what the likely response of a hypothetical candidate for the dilemma would be according to known biases of that persons and how much they’d affect his/her decision.
September 7th, 2006 at 7:52 pm - IP Man-Hash: 0a8832bed8813
No, female castration would work better. Not much different than male castration.
April 21st, 2007 at 6:23 am - IP Man-Hash: f7e99ec38ed5f
Fem, I do hope you realize that all you do when you come on here is prove exactly how incompetant and unacceptable women are. You fucking crazy bitch! Hey guys, I bet 5 bucks that she is one of those crazy bitches who cried date rape because she felt like a slut the next morning when she woke up to the first guy who got to her when she was drunk the night before.
June 29th, 2007 at 3:48 am - IP Man-Hash: 0edc87a160c4c
Do all the men on here feel that rape should still be illegal or should be legal and im talking about rape of women not when its men raping men. I am bisexual so I still disagree with anyone who hates gay people but I feel that lesbians should have a special card saying that they are lesbians and the only way to prove this is like the way to tell if a man is totally gay when they view pics of men their penis erects. So if women get turned on by women but not men then they can have the card. There are women who feel men are superior that believe rape should be legal. What do you guys think since I have yet to here a woman on here who does not believe in female supremacy . I respect your views and hate the view and the idea of feminists and their ideology.
June 29th, 2007 at 6:30 am - IP Man-Hash: 72dadca35debd
No raping for me thanks!
July 9th, 2007 at 6:48 am - IP Man-Hash: e4335652e42df
I don’t think anyone thinks rape should be legal. I don’t really know where you would get that. Unless you are referring to the feminist belief that all sex between a man and a woman is rape.
@Jakob: You are boring me.
July 9th, 2007 at 7:03 am - IP Man-Hash: 5fd634f6ed1ed
That’s christianity actually. In response to ours Kelly, rape is evil. Really evil. In fact, you should read my article on rape and see what you think: http://www.decayingsword.mabtw.com.
Ariadachi
July 9th, 2007 at 7:04 am - IP Man-Hash: 5fd634f6ed1ed
I meant that to be for TheNotSoExtremeMaleSupremacist but meh visit the site anyway.
July 9th, 2007 at 7:18 am - IP Man-Hash: e4335652e42df
That’s christianity actually. In response to ours Kelly, rape is evil. Really evil. In fact, you should read my article on rape and see what you think: http://www.decayingsword.mabtw.com.
Ariadachi
I was speaking of the quote that has been attributed to Catherine MacKinnon. However, when I googled it to remind me of her name, I came across a swopes article that says she never said it, so….kind of takes the air out of my comment.
I read your article. I agree with you. Rape - REAL rape - is evil. However, I don’t count “I was drunk last night and now I can’t believe I slept with you” as rape.
July 9th, 2007 at 7:20 am - IP Man-Hash: e4335652e42df
I was speaking of the quote that has been attributed to Catherine MacKinnon. However, when I googled it to remind me of her name, I came across a swopes article that says she never said it, so….kind of takes the air out of my comment.
I read your article. I agree with you. Rape - REAL rape - is evil. However, I don’t count “I was drunk last night and now I can’t believe I slept with you” as rape.
I’m not sure what you mean about “that’s Christianity”. I don’t think I’ve ever heard that sex = rape about that religion.
July 26th, 2007 at 4:24 am - IP Man-Hash: 4c79471ede76e
Being drunk = being under the influence of a drug = unable to freely consent = any sex with that person is rape
July 26th, 2007 at 4:36 am - IP Man-Hash: fe35829a9c492
Being drunk = your fault. Period, bitch.
‘I couldn’t consent to crashing my car into that 10 year old child, so it’s the kid’s fault.’
Did the man use a funnel and make like you were a French goose? Did you scream and fight not to swallow every drink he was benevolent enough to give you, and for being a superior girl nonetheless? No? Then it’s your fault, whore. If you don’t fight with every muscle in your body and if your life is not in danger (gurls have proven themselves unable to assess fear, so we’ll have to listen to the credible witness here), it is consensual. Maybe not by the whims of society, but by moral values. Therefore, if you file charges against such a person, you deserve to serve every second of pain and misery the innocent man serves and then some. And if you falsely accuse him, why not allow the public rape and humiliation of you? That’s what would have happened to him. Door swings both ways, stupid cunt.
Stupid slut. Now leave and don’t return.
July 26th, 2007 at 4:39 am - IP Man-Hash: 4555637db20cf
That makes perfect sense. So if I get drunk, i.e. being under the influence of a drug, and I decide to drive home and I accidentally kill a half-dozen people, then I should not be held accountable because it was the drug’s fault that my driving was impaired, and not mine.
July 26th, 2007 at 4:39 am - IP Man-Hash: fe35829a9c492
Such a person meaning someone who did rape you out of the evil and blackness of his own heart.
And to raise a point, how therapeutic is it to ostracize such individuals and isolate them from society? I fail to see the purpose in such a system - it seems more emotional and whimsical than logical. The rest of his life, just because of one mistake. Psychological ‘damage’ and questionable motives. Just ridiculous.