Women + Math = Disaster

Harvard University has produced many great men of higher learning since it has been in business. They know who they are. I don’t need to mention any of them here — probably a bunch of presidents and whatnot, all of us men know how the game works. That’s not what’s up for debate.

Actually nothing is up for debate. The head of Harvard University said at a conference recently that women suck at math and science. What he did was grant all women an honorary PhD in In Your Face-onomics.

The point he was trying to make was simple: when it comes to math or science or using your brain, men are using the cream of the crop of brains — the top shelf. We are driving high performance thinking machines. We are moving mountains of thought with our mighty man-brains which operate like huge construction machinery.

Women, the headmaster of America’s top university is saying, are using brains that resemble a broken tricycle one might find at a garage sale in the bad part of town. Women’s brains reek of tetanus and squeak like a hamster wheel.

I checked around for an exact quote from the esteemed president of Harvard: Lawrence “The Never-ending” Summers, but I couldn’t find one. This is probably what he said though:

“Women couldn’t do math even if it tasted like chocolate.”

The fact that he’s right in every way didn’t keep fore-running members of the woman community from throwing major hissy-fits the second the words left his mouth. I’m sure they had been lying in wait for such a baseless, yet socially imposed social faux pas — like rats lurking under the picnic tables at the county fair. That’s how women behave when they land themselves in an industry where good looks and cock teasing won’t save their ass: the man-realm of science.

Related Articles:

RSS feed | Trackback URI

203 Comments in 203 threads.»

Pages: « 11 10 [9] 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 » Show All

Comment by e v i l e d d y
2007-09-22 20:55:16

Do you find most of your female friends are the type we are talking about on this site?

 
Comment by kristina
2007-09-22 20:33:59

:D forgive me if im shy evileddy, after all ive only recently lost my virginity…but im learning and ive only been with one guy…my boyfriend…thank you very much…and yes before any of you comments on it…i do plan on being with one guy….if my byoyfriend wants me still after a year of dating of course…but no im not gonna be the fuck as many guys as i can girl….i do have some standards…no matter the whorish naughty female i may sem to be to you guys :D

 
Comment by e v i l e d d y
2007-09-22 20:27:23

kristina said:
and ive only ever given one blowjob

More a lie there and expect the man to please you type princess?

 
Comment by kristina
2007-09-22 20:23:58

sigh how bout a cookie sonyad? you have me there i have been caught in an actaul misspell….crap…now im just a no good whore who cant even spell….ah well….

heres your cookie sonyad heres your cookie come and get it….now theres a good boy

 
Comment by sonyad
2007-09-22 20:17:35

I got a woman(?) to misspell ‘misogynous’ by making fun of the notion.
Do I get nookie or a cookie?

- David Guetta Feat Jd Davis - The World is Mine (Original Mix)

 
Comment by kristina
2007-09-22 20:12:42

actually i wouldnt suck any mans cock to show him the error of his misogenious ways….and ive only ever given one blowjob…..hmmm…youve seriously misjudged me sonyad…thats ok ….it happens to the best of us….:)

next?

 
Comment by sonyad
2007-09-22 20:09:57

Aye, then that I be, matey. Silly and stupid.

You don’t mean any of them like you prolly wouldn’t be meaning to suck his dick (just to show him the error of his misogenieious way, of course) if you had the op. either.

Right. In all your posts, you oft manage to put it so much better than Dick, Wolfe, others or I ever could. Self cognizance be, it must!

- Timbaland ft One Republic - Apologize

 
Comment by kristina
2007-09-22 20:01:13

aw whats the matter sonyad? dont like it when a female has a sense of humor?

if you think im really meaning all the flirtations than you are silly and stupid…but then again maybe not…after all according to you we females are nothing but flirtatious sluts after all right?

 
Comment by sonyad
2007-09-22 19:52:06

I feel like barfing; no offense, soundwave.

- Dj Rynno feat. Sylvia - Feel (Mtv Dj Awards 2007)

 
Comment by kristina
2007-09-22 19:38:26

well i do enjoy reading so ill be sure to read it:D just for you my dear soundwave :)

 
Comment by soundwave
2007-09-22 19:11:18

kristina said:

you dont think women were treated like shit in the middles ages and such? or that they didnt have the same advantages? then look up your history…women were encouraged…and by their husbands and fathers…to be brainless twits

You really need to read this book: http://www.warrenfarrell.org/
http://www.warrenfarrell.org/TheBook/index.html

 
Comment by kristina
2007-09-22 18:56:57

you dont think women were treated like shit in the middles ages and such? or that they didnt have the same advantages? then look up your history…women were encouraged…and by their husbands and fathers…to be brainless twits

 
Comment by sonyad
2007-09-22 18:27:47

Sorry, sugar tits. I’m afraid substituting one falsified myth with another, likewise false myth simply doesn’t cut it passed the “trickle down” the bullshit scrubber.

- David Guetta - The World is Mine

 
Comment by kristina
2007-09-22 16:40:46

MansVoice said:

Suze said:

I have two words to say about your theory that women are crap at science; Marie Curie

Is that all you have to say? Lmao. How long did it take you to search a webpage for that? For men, its just top off our heads: Einstein, Newton, Edison… the list goes on.

Women geniuses are rare as compared to men. Why? Because men are better than women.

you also have to admit though that in those times and further back females werent encouraged to learn…therefore who knows how many smart females there could have been if some had had the same advantages? or how many were stoned and burned in really early times because they were too smart? men arent peaches and cream themselves…even my dad will admit that in those ages women werent treated fairly or right…

 
Comment by soundwave
2007-09-22 16:09:26

Happy & Successful said:

You know that male brain cells start dying off at an alarming rate after 40?

That’s ok, since men already have at least 3 billion more brain cells than women to begin with:

http://www.math.earlham.edu/WomensBrains.html
http://christianparty.net/3billion.htm
http://www.livescience.com/health/060908_brainy_men.html

 
Comment by wolfe
2007-08-31 07:00:39

whoosh!
-wolfe

 
Comment by sonyad
2007-08-31 06:56:04

Or rather the imaginary part of a complex number. I wonder what the real, body part she’s alluding to is.

Maybe she will dispose to showcase the solution through graphical representation.

- Chris Brown & Kate Fenner - Resist War
- http://www.resistwar.com

 
Comment by wolfe
2007-08-31 06:11:55

@diamatik A complex construct such as smrtpant’s “i² = -1″ is certainly an imaginary number.

-wolfe

 
Comment by diamatik
2007-08-31 05:44:29

smrtpants has pissed me off. I remember from my days of ole at school that if you square any number that the result must be +ve. So even if you use the variable ‘i’ the outcome can never be -ve.

i² = -1 is not logical, and neither are women.

 
Comment by sonyad
2007-08-31 05:05:28

Why don’t you show us?

- Chris Brown & Kate Fenner - Resist War
- http://www.resistwar.com

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

Close
E-mail It
Powered by ShareThis