<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Women + Math = Disaster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-good-at-math/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-good-at-math/</link>
	<description>Are men better than women?   Yes.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:03:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AA</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-good-at-math/comment-page-6/#comment-504040</link>
		<dc:creator>AA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 02:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050526/women-math-not-at-all/#comment-504040</guid>
		<description>Stupid Bitch do one thing. Make two columns.

Put in one column all the contributions,inventions,discoveries made by wimmin since the dawn of civilization

&amp;

In another column put down all the contributions,inventions &amp; discoveries made by man since dawn of mankind.

You will soon realize wimmin&#039;s contributions are basically an insignificant drop in the ocean &amp; are neither path breaking, ground breaking or significant enough to merit much attention.

The problem is bitches like you who mouth these statistics like some holy shit are TRUE BITCHES in REAL SENSE &amp; NEED A BIG KICK IN YOUR ARSE.

The wimmin folk who have done some contribution to the advancement of mankind understand their value of contribution &amp; know exactly where they stand with respect to man.

THEY DO NOT BITCH.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stupid Bitch do one thing. Make two columns.</p>
<p>Put in one column all the contributions,inventions,discoveries made by wimmin since the dawn of civilization</p>
<p>&amp;</p>
<p>In another column put down all the contributions,inventions &amp; discoveries made by man since dawn of mankind.</p>
<p>You will soon realize wimmin&#8217;s contributions are basically an insignificant drop in the ocean &amp; are neither path breaking, ground breaking or significant enough to merit much attention.</p>
<p>The problem is bitches like you who mouth these statistics like some holy shit are TRUE BITCHES in REAL SENSE &amp; NEED A BIG KICK IN YOUR ARSE.</p>
<p>The wimmin folk who have done some contribution to the advancement of mankind understand their value of contribution &amp; know exactly where they stand with respect to man.</p>
<p>THEY DO NOT BITCH.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kickasssarah</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-good-at-math/comment-page-6/#comment-504022</link>
		<dc:creator>kickasssarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 01:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050526/women-math-not-at-all/#comment-504022</guid>
		<description>Danica McKellar. Modern sexy-ass math whiz.

She&#039;s my favorite...

As the author of Famous Mathematicians from Underrepresented Groups said: “… until recently, women were mostly prevented from doing mathematics, so relatively few women have become famous in mathematics.”

But here are some of the ones who contributed greatly to our society:

Theano - Wife of Pythagoras. Ran School of Pythagoras after his death. Wrote works on the Golden Ratio.

Rosza Peter - Péter was the author of Playing with Infinity: Mathematical Explorations and Excursions, translated into at least 14 languages, and Recursive Functions in Computer Theory. The latter was the second Hungarian mathematical book to be published in the Soviet Union because its subject matter was considered indispensable to the theory of computers.

Winifred Edgarton Merril - Worked on the geometrical interpretation of multiple integrals and figured out the computation of the orbit of a comet.

Maria Gaetana Agnesi - Most important work: Analytical Institutions gave a clear summary of the state of knowledge in mathematical analysis. It included: analysis of finite quantities; elementary problems of maxima, minima, tangents, and inflection points; analysis of infinitely small quantities; integral calculus; and the inverse method of tangents and differential equations.

Grace Chisolm Young - Worked with her husband on set theory. Authored 13 publications with her husband and 18 by herself.

Edith Clarke - She became an authority on the manipulation of hyperbolic functions, equivalent circuits, and graphical analysis.

Irmgard Flugge-Lotz - Professor Flugge-Lotz acted in a central role in the development of the aircraft industry in the Western world. Her contributions spanned a lifetime during which she demonstrated, in a field dominated by men, the value and quality of a woman’s intuitive approach in searching for and discovering solutions to complex engineering problems.

Ellen Amanda Hayes - Hayes wrote several textbooks on Lessons on Higher Algebra (1891, revised 1894), Elementary Trigonometry (1896), and Calculus with Applications, An Introduction to the Mathematical Treatment of Science (1900).

Edna Kramer-Lassar - Kramer’s greatest work is considered the book, The Nature and Growth of Modern Mathematics, which was published in 1970. This work took her 14 years to complete. In 1972 she was elected into the Hall of Fame at Hunter College. Her many books still are read and studied today, including A First Course in Educational Statistics, Mathematics Takes Wings: An Aviation Supplement to Secondary Mathematics, and The Main Stream of Mathematics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danica McKellar. Modern sexy-ass math whiz.</p>
<p>She&#8217;s my favorite&#8230;</p>
<p>As the author of Famous Mathematicians from Underrepresented Groups said: “… until recently, women were mostly prevented from doing mathematics, so relatively few women have become famous in mathematics.”</p>
<p>But here are some of the ones who contributed greatly to our society:</p>
<p>Theano &#8211; Wife of Pythagoras. Ran School of Pythagoras after his death. Wrote works on the Golden Ratio.</p>
<p>Rosza Peter &#8211; Péter was the author of Playing with Infinity: Mathematical Explorations and Excursions, translated into at least 14 languages, and Recursive Functions in Computer Theory. The latter was the second Hungarian mathematical book to be published in the Soviet Union because its subject matter was considered indispensable to the theory of computers.</p>
<p>Winifred Edgarton Merril &#8211; Worked on the geometrical interpretation of multiple integrals and figured out the computation of the orbit of a comet.</p>
<p>Maria Gaetana Agnesi &#8211; Most important work: Analytical Institutions gave a clear summary of the state of knowledge in mathematical analysis. It included: analysis of finite quantities; elementary problems of maxima, minima, tangents, and inflection points; analysis of infinitely small quantities; integral calculus; and the inverse method of tangents and differential equations.</p>
<p>Grace Chisolm Young &#8211; Worked with her husband on set theory. Authored 13 publications with her husband and 18 by herself.</p>
<p>Edith Clarke &#8211; She became an authority on the manipulation of hyperbolic functions, equivalent circuits, and graphical analysis.</p>
<p>Irmgard Flugge-Lotz &#8211; Professor Flugge-Lotz acted in a central role in the development of the aircraft industry in the Western world. Her contributions spanned a lifetime during which she demonstrated, in a field dominated by men, the value and quality of a woman’s intuitive approach in searching for and discovering solutions to complex engineering problems.</p>
<p>Ellen Amanda Hayes &#8211; Hayes wrote several textbooks on Lessons on Higher Algebra (1891, revised 1894), Elementary Trigonometry (1896), and Calculus with Applications, An Introduction to the Mathematical Treatment of Science (1900).</p>
<p>Edna Kramer-Lassar &#8211; Kramer’s greatest work is considered the book, The Nature and Growth of Modern Mathematics, which was published in 1970. This work took her 14 years to complete. In 1972 she was elected into the Hall of Fame at Hunter College. Her many books still are read and studied today, including A First Course in Educational Statistics, Mathematics Takes Wings: An Aviation Supplement to Secondary Mathematics, and The Main Stream of Mathematics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watcher</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-good-at-math/comment-page-6/#comment-500157</link>
		<dc:creator>Watcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 01:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050526/women-math-not-at-all/#comment-500157</guid>
		<description>It is indeed lucky that you don&#039;t need &quot;statistics or numbers&quot; in order to prove that women are equal to men in mathematics, simply because there aren&#039;t any.  All credible empirical studies indicate that males are, in general, superior to women in the field of mathematics and science.  Only an idiot would say they didn&#039;t need &quot;statistics or numbers&quot; to prove something (and this comes from a woman who ironically calls herself &quot;MathChicK&quot;).

On the subject of idiocy, please learn how to use a ‘spell checker’ or at least proof read your messages before posting them.  Gibberish like, &quot;Women and mathematics are the miss link to the dieing subject&quot; does nothing to serve your cause.  

So in essence, within a single post you have not only managed to demonstrate a poor grasp of conceptual logic and the English language but you have managed to combine these qualities with an inability to follow even simple instructions such as ‘this site is for men only’.
 
I honestly feel that if you took two remote islands; dumped 500 men on one and 500 women on the other, with no way of contacting or being contacted by the outside world, and returned two years later you would find the following.  

If the men did not wipe themselves out in the initial power struggles, you would find an organised thriving community with a considered and structured social hierarchy, technology and agriculture.

On the other island you would discover the remains of the women dead where they disembarked on the beach.

Love this site</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is indeed lucky that you don&#8217;t need &#8220;statistics or numbers&#8221; in order to prove that women are equal to men in mathematics, simply because there aren&#8217;t any.  All credible empirical studies indicate that males are, in general, superior to women in the field of mathematics and science.  Only an idiot would say they didn&#8217;t need &#8220;statistics or numbers&#8221; to prove something (and this comes from a woman who ironically calls herself &#8220;MathChicK&#8221;).</p>
<p>On the subject of idiocy, please learn how to use a ‘spell checker’ or at least proof read your messages before posting them.  Gibberish like, &#8220;Women and mathematics are the miss link to the dieing subject&#8221; does nothing to serve your cause.  </p>
<p>So in essence, within a single post you have not only managed to demonstrate a poor grasp of conceptual logic and the English language but you have managed to combine these qualities with an inability to follow even simple instructions such as ‘this site is for men only’.</p>
<p>I honestly feel that if you took two remote islands; dumped 500 men on one and 500 women on the other, with no way of contacting or being contacted by the outside world, and returned two years later you would find the following.  </p>
<p>If the men did not wipe themselves out in the initial power struggles, you would find an organised thriving community with a considered and structured social hierarchy, technology and agriculture.</p>
<p>On the other island you would discover the remains of the women dead where they disembarked on the beach.</p>
<p>Love this site</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emo slut</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-good-at-math/comment-page-6/#comment-480663</link>
		<dc:creator>emo slut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 05:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050526/women-math-not-at-all/#comment-480663</guid>
		<description>emo girls are the hottest imo but any girl on webcam is just sexy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>emo girls are the hottest imo but any girl on webcam is just sexy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: studioline</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-good-at-math/comment-page-6/#comment-454447</link>
		<dc:creator>studioline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050526/women-math-not-at-all/#comment-454447</guid>
		<description>Great observation man,

That&#039;s a perfect example of a female using her own inteligece against herself and other females. Being 10 yo and having scored 228, her advices must be very popular among other females.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great observation man,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a perfect example of a female using her own inteligece against herself and other females. Being 10 yo and having scored 228, her advices must be very popular among other females.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walt</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-good-at-math/comment-page-6/#comment-454426</link>
		<dc:creator>Walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 04:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050526/women-math-not-at-all/#comment-454426</guid>
		<description>I read an article in the Financial Times entitled &quot;Is a high IQ a burden as much as a blessing?&quot; which featured Marilyn vos Savant who at the age of 10 scored an IQ of 228. Do you know what she does with this talent ?...She writes an advice column for Parade magazine not cure Cancer or Aids or solve poverty, hunger, or world peace or any thing a man would have naturally used this gift for..no, an advice column. At least her husband invented the artificial heart. Dick Masterson, you sir are correct and this information should only add proof to your astute logical analysis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read an article in the Financial Times entitled &#8220;Is a high IQ a burden as much as a blessing?&#8221; which featured Marilyn vos Savant who at the age of 10 scored an IQ of 228. Do you know what she does with this talent ?&#8230;She writes an advice column for Parade magazine not cure Cancer or Aids or solve poverty, hunger, or world peace or any thing a man would have naturally used this gift for..no, an advice column. At least her husband invented the artificial heart. Dick Masterson, you sir are correct and this information should only add proof to your astute logical analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D.W.</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-good-at-math/comment-page-6/#comment-448425</link>
		<dc:creator>D.W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 03:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050526/women-math-not-at-all/#comment-448425</guid>
		<description>I find that topic about women very hilarious, so many trolls trolling women to feel so right about themselves. Both genders prove satisfaction for the world, it&#039;s like a &quot;battle for the sexes&quot; so entertaining.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find that topic about women very hilarious, so many trolls trolling women to feel so right about themselves. Both genders prove satisfaction for the world, it&#8217;s like a &#8220;battle for the sexes&#8221; so entertaining.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John_Petrucci</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-good-at-math/comment-page-6/#comment-396051</link>
		<dc:creator>John_Petrucci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 01:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050526/women-math-not-at-all/#comment-396051</guid>
		<description>Oh, but it &#039;twas. ^_^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, but it &#8217;twas. ^_^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Man's Suggestion For Sweeties.</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-good-at-math/comment-page-6/#comment-346243</link>
		<dc:creator>A Man's Suggestion For Sweeties.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 05:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050526/women-math-not-at-all/#comment-346243</guid>
		<description>I have read one of the comments your conqueror has left you.Let me tell you something, sweety : it is GREAT that you were TOLD to focus on cuteness.This is how it should be.Your conqueror was right in saying that girlish logic is the same as putting a dress on a horse&#039;s ass.It CAN be done but what&#039;s the point?Sweety,I hate to break it to you, but your logic will ALWAYS be at that level.You WILL ALWAYS see THAT kind of asinine logic as NORMAL.You are female and females are even worse than (male,female not even counting) children.If I were to decide,I would leave you with a ten-year old male to take care of you.Sweety,you gotta understand.Math is not for you and your logic.

I have come up with something better to satisfy your needs,Alice.Take a look at the following scenario.

A.You take up horseback riding lessons.
B.You wear a short pink dress with nothing underneath.
C.You paint your nails pink.
D.Nails long.
E.You get a red riding cap.
F.You get proper heels.As big as possible.Up to your knees.

Now you gotta ask a man about a proper saddle.After all is done,gather as many girlies as you can.You crave attention and cuteness?Then you&#039;re just going to love my suggestion.

Remember: LEAVE MATH TO ADULTS.DO NOT POLLUTE IT WITH YOUR AS(S)ININE LOGIC.YOU JUST DISRESPECT THE MATH THAT WAY,GIRLIE.STICK TO YOUR PROPER ROLES AND BE GRATEFUL FOR THAT.

Have A Productive Day.

P.S. You just got OWNED.CONGRATULATIONS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read one of the comments your conqueror has left you.Let me tell you something, sweety : it is GREAT that you were TOLD to focus on cuteness.This is how it should be.Your conqueror was right in saying that girlish logic is the same as putting a dress on a horse&#8217;s ass.It CAN be done but what&#8217;s the point?Sweety,I hate to break it to you, but your logic will ALWAYS be at that level.You WILL ALWAYS see THAT kind of asinine logic as NORMAL.You are female and females are even worse than (male,female not even counting) children.If I were to decide,I would leave you with a ten-year old male to take care of you.Sweety,you gotta understand.Math is not for you and your logic.</p>
<p>I have come up with something better to satisfy your needs,Alice.Take a look at the following scenario.</p>
<p>A.You take up horseback riding lessons.<br />
B.You wear a short pink dress with nothing underneath.<br />
C.You paint your nails pink.<br />
D.Nails long.<br />
E.You get a red riding cap.<br />
F.You get proper heels.As big as possible.Up to your knees.</p>
<p>Now you gotta ask a man about a proper saddle.After all is done,gather as many girlies as you can.You crave attention and cuteness?Then you&#8217;re just going to love my suggestion.</p>
<p>Remember: LEAVE MATH TO ADULTS.DO NOT POLLUTE IT WITH YOUR AS(S)ININE LOGIC.YOU JUST DISRESPECT THE MATH THAT WAY,GIRLIE.STICK TO YOUR PROPER ROLES AND BE GRATEFUL FOR THAT.</p>
<p>Have A Productive Day.</p>
<p>P.S. You just got OWNED.CONGRATULATIONS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cardinal Glick</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-good-at-math/comment-page-6/#comment-345533</link>
		<dc:creator>Cardinal Glick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050526/women-math-not-at-all/#comment-345533</guid>
		<description>It wasn&#039;t relevant</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wasn&#8217;t relevant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alice</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-good-at-math/comment-page-6/#comment-345513</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050526/women-math-not-at-all/#comment-345513</guid>
		<description>This text is pretty close to the truth unfortunately, at least for me..I still blame the upbringing and focus on &#039;&#039;cuteness&#039;&#039; that girls are surrounded by :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This text is pretty close to the truth unfortunately, at least for me..I still blame the upbringing and focus on &#8221;cuteness&#8221; that girls are surrounded by :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: psiros</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-good-at-math/comment-page-6/#comment-345114</link>
		<dc:creator>psiros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 00:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050526/women-math-not-at-all/#comment-345114</guid>
		<description>Thank you, sir.  Yours have been exceptionally poignant as well.  

It seems to me there have been more whimmin trolling on here in the last few weeks.  I&#039;m thinking word is spreading and they come here and start shit just to get corrected.  Not sure if I&#039;m the only one who thnks so, but at least it&#039;s inspired more creative thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, sir.  Yours have been exceptionally poignant as well.  </p>
<p>It seems to me there have been more whimmin trolling on here in the last few weeks.  I&#8217;m thinking word is spreading and they come here and start shit just to get corrected.  Not sure if I&#8217;m the only one who thnks so, but at least it&#8217;s inspired more creative thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-good-at-math/comment-page-6/#comment-345109</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 00:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050526/women-math-not-at-all/#comment-345109</guid>
		<description>@PSIROS

I don&#039;t normally LMAO..... but LMAO.

It&#039;s appropriate here.

Some really good posts recently too! 
I enjoyed reading them</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@PSIROS</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t normally LMAO&#8230;.. but LMAO.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s appropriate here.</p>
<p>Some really good posts recently too!<br />
I enjoyed reading them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: psiros</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-good-at-math/comment-page-6/#comment-345104</link>
		<dc:creator>psiros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 00:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050526/women-math-not-at-all/#comment-345104</guid>
		<description>Asinine fucking emoticons make whimmin look immature.  Just once I&#039;d like to see a woman assemble one cogent goddamn paragraph without the crutches of emoticons, abbreviations and all other manner of horseshit that makes it look like a five-year-old typed something while having a goddamn seizure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Asinine fucking emoticons make whimmin look immature.  Just once I&#8217;d like to see a woman assemble one cogent goddamn paragraph without the crutches of emoticons, abbreviations and all other manner of horseshit that makes it look like a five-year-old typed something while having a goddamn seizure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-good-at-math/comment-page-6/#comment-345029</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 21:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050526/women-math-not-at-all/#comment-345029</guid>
		<description>That doesn&#039;t surprise me in the least.

ALMOST ALL women don&#039;t like wussies.  They never feel a &quot;true gut-level attraction&quot; for wussies.

But what&#039;s interesting is that women actually COMMUNICATE TO MEN that they WANT a wussy.

&quot;I want a man who is nice, polite, funny, gentle, smart etc&quot;, but women actually RUN AWAY from weak men like that.

.. and then she goes and fucks someone ELSE.

&quot;I want a really nice guy&quot; one of the biggest lies that women tell each other AND MEN. And the men who aren&#039;t careful actually believe it!

Men will blindly listen to that female programming garbage and are often left scratching their heads wondering why she just didn&#039;t &quot;FEEL IT&quot; for him and why she ran off with &quot;jerk boy&quot; instead.

Its even more interesting that women almost NEVER use the word &quot;STRONG&quot; when describing a guy they would like.... but that is the NUMBER ONE THING that a guy has to be if a guy wants a girl to REALLY be attracted to him.

A REAL MAN NEVER TOLERATES ANY BULLSHIT.

A NICE GUY (WUSSY) WILL.

... and that&#039;s why they &quot;finish last&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That doesn&#8217;t surprise me in the least.</p>
<p>ALMOST ALL women don&#8217;t like wussies.  They never feel a &#8220;true gut-level attraction&#8221; for wussies.</p>
<p>But what&#8217;s interesting is that women actually COMMUNICATE TO MEN that they WANT a wussy.</p>
<p>&#8220;I want a man who is nice, polite, funny, gentle, smart etc&#8221;, but women actually RUN AWAY from weak men like that.</p>
<p>.. and then she goes and fucks someone ELSE.</p>
<p>&#8220;I want a really nice guy&#8221; one of the biggest lies that women tell each other AND MEN. And the men who aren&#8217;t careful actually believe it!</p>
<p>Men will blindly listen to that female programming garbage and are often left scratching their heads wondering why she just didn&#8217;t &#8220;FEEL IT&#8221; for him and why she ran off with &#8220;jerk boy&#8221; instead.</p>
<p>Its even more interesting that women almost NEVER use the word &#8220;STRONG&#8221; when describing a guy they would like&#8230;. but that is the NUMBER ONE THING that a guy has to be if a guy wants a girl to REALLY be attracted to him.</p>
<p>A REAL MAN NEVER TOLERATES ANY BULLSHIT.</p>
<p>A NICE GUY (WUSSY) WILL.</p>
<p>&#8230; and that&#8217;s why they &#8220;finish last&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alice</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-good-at-math/comment-page-5/#comment-345021</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 21:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050526/women-math-not-at-all/#comment-345021</guid>
		<description>It makes sense to me, expletives make it even clearer I think..I&#039;ll see what this website contains and leave you in peace if necessary. I don&#039;t really like &#039;&#039;wussies&#039;&#039; myself that much</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes sense to me, expletives make it even clearer I think..I&#8217;ll see what this website contains and leave you in peace if necessary. I don&#8217;t really like &#8221;wussies&#8221; myself that much</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-good-at-math/comment-page-5/#comment-345019</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 21:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050526/women-math-not-at-all/#comment-345019</guid>
		<description>@ALICE

REAL MEN treat women according to HER OWN behavior.  Not the &quot;unconditional love&quot; way she &quot;wants&quot; all the time.

If a girl behaves well, a real man will treat her well.
If she behaves like cunt, she will be treated like one.

If she behaves like an angel, 
she will be treated like an angel.

If she behaves like an idiot bitch whore,
she will be treated like that too.

ALL OF US MEN KNOW EXACTLY HOW TO TREAT WOMEN &quot;PERFECTLY&quot; --&gt;&gt; just treat her the way she wants, no matter how shitty her behavior.

That&#039;s what these idiots EXPECT.

BUT THERE IS ONLY WAY TO REALLY TREAT A WOMAN &quot;PROPERLY&quot; ---&gt;&gt; according to her own behavior.

As long as a man does THAT, his relationships with women will ALWAYS go the way he wants them to. Even if it means a girl &quot;just doesn&#039;t like it&quot; and leaves because she would rather have a WUSSY.

Men who treat women well &quot;all the time - no matter what&quot; are not the MEN you will find here. And those men are ALWAYS complaining that their relationships with women NEVER go the way HE wants them to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ALICE</p>
<p>REAL MEN treat women according to HER OWN behavior.  Not the &#8220;unconditional love&#8221; way she &#8220;wants&#8221; all the time.</p>
<p>If a girl behaves well, a real man will treat her well.<br />
If she behaves like cunt, she will be treated like one.</p>
<p>If she behaves like an angel,<br />
she will be treated like an angel.</p>
<p>If she behaves like an idiot bitch whore,<br />
she will be treated like that too.</p>
<p>ALL OF US MEN KNOW EXACTLY HOW TO TREAT WOMEN &#8220;PERFECTLY&#8221; &#8211;&gt;&gt; just treat her the way she wants, no matter how shitty her behavior.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what these idiots EXPECT.</p>
<p>BUT THERE IS ONLY WAY TO REALLY TREAT A WOMAN &#8220;PROPERLY&#8221; &#8212;&gt;&gt; according to her own behavior.</p>
<p>As long as a man does THAT, his relationships with women will ALWAYS go the way he wants them to. Even if it means a girl &#8220;just doesn&#8217;t like it&#8221; and leaves because she would rather have a WUSSY.</p>
<p>Men who treat women well &#8220;all the time &#8211; no matter what&#8221; are not the MEN you will find here. And those men are ALWAYS complaining that their relationships with women NEVER go the way HE wants them to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alice</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-good-at-math/comment-page-5/#comment-345016</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 21:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050526/women-math-not-at-all/#comment-345016</guid>
		<description>I found a youtube video and wanted to see whether this site is a joke or serious , it was kind of different than the rest</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found a youtube video and wanted to see whether this site is a joke or serious , it was kind of different than the rest</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John_Petrucci</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-good-at-math/comment-page-5/#comment-345013</link>
		<dc:creator>John_Petrucci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 21:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050526/women-math-not-at-all/#comment-345013</guid>
		<description>I have a question, Alice...what&#039;s your motive to hang around here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question, Alice&#8230;what&#8217;s your motive to hang around here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alice</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-good-at-math/comment-page-5/#comment-345012</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 21:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050526/women-math-not-at-all/#comment-345012</guid>
		<description>Thank you..as long as someone doesn&#039;t shower me with c and f words, I guess I&#039;m safe :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you..as long as someone doesn&#8217;t shower me with c and f words, I guess I&#8217;m safe :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
