In the end dalsgaard it takes violence or memorable actions in meat space to make the powerful quake in their golden boots and shit golden eggs you can chuck at their thick fucking skulls.

Not fucking websites or papers or brochures.

This site is good for recruiting and not another god damned thing.

All with power fear to lose it and won’t without blood.

The opinion that you have the right to speak without getting stoned is preposterous.

The opinion that one sex of the human species is inferior to the other is ignorant.

dalsgaard said:
And this is where you are going to be wrong. Sometimes you have to call for desperate measures in order to have people recognize problems. When America engaged in the Iraq war, our danish prime minister was on his tiptoes trying to help America in the war, even though there were several minorities throughout the country suggesting another way to dissolve the crisis.

The problem is, that peoples meanings got ignored. Noone even took a second glance at the possible dangers ahead.

Then, as our prime minister left the press conference, someone threw a bucket of red paint over him screaming at the top of his lungs: “Anders Fogh, you got blood on your hands!”.

Now you may say what you want about the people humiliating our minister in that matter. But nonetheless, it spawned country-wide debate on the subject, and it created awareness. People started asking questions like never before.

People out there HAVE tried to be diplomatic. “Why does the head of our gender equality orginization have to be a woman?”. “Why is there only 3 male members, and 19 female members?”. These questions just does’nt sink in! They have no impact! Even though people KNOW that these are important questions, noone tells their friend about them.

THIS is a site that people will hear about. This is a movement that will increase in size, Dick is going to recieve a huge bill monthly because of all the men that will slowly join his movement because they recognize the subtle points in the comments and articles.

And at some point, it will get recognized. The question will come up in the media, wether it be “What’s wrong with these people?” or “These things are worth looking into” - we have awareness. And that’s what is more or less going to happen.

Excellent post man. Yes, this site is here to…in a way.. create awareness. One day, men of the future will bow down on their knees and thank Dick for what he has done. God bless you, great man of mans. I dont care how little a difference it is making Fem. People ARE getting more aware. Men ARE rising. The age of women will pass faster than it has even begun. We will triumph.

“Cheating is just like getting pregnant it is 100% a woman’s fault 100% of the time”
-Dick Masterson

Personally, I fail to see how carrying 1 species along for it’s own good is opression. California Condors are kept only in certain areas, are protected by law, and bred all for their own good. Is that oppression?

Don’t answer that, it’s a rhetorical question.

All female oppression is the fault of the woman. Ask any woman in an abusive relationship and you can see that it was her fault.

Billy - You are just a complete ass and hopefully one day you can wake up and see that oppression is not always brought on by ourselves. But sometimes it’s brought on by the much stronger men that are unfortunately in our lives.

Wow

Female said:

Did you know that when Pythagorus opened his second university in 529BC that women were also able to enroll? There was no discrimation on the basis of gender or race or financial means or religion. It was truly egalitarian, apparently. Pity then that the standards set by visionaries such as Pythagorus did not continue to be the norm. In England, until the 1950s, a woman had no legal rights over herself, her property or her money.
Do you wish to repeal todays laws back to this sorry state of affairs?

There has never been any oppression other than the oppression women brought on themselves because of the limited females brain.. Female you are a retard and I agree with Necro that you should be drawn and quartered.

According to UC Irvine economics professor Richard McKenzie, “Upwards of 22,000 babies are abandoned annually in the hospitals in which they were born.”

I’ve no idea if this statistic is true or not, but the source seems credible. I’ve noted before that 1.5 million American women legally walk away from motherhood every year through adoption or abortion, and that in over 40 states mothers can completely opt out of motherhood by returning unwanted babies to the hospital shortly after birth. I don’t condone unwed fathers who won’t support their babies, but it’s always seemed curious to me that we label unwed fathers who are reluctant to pay child support “deadbeats,” yet do not apply the label to women who similarly reject parenthood by returning their unwanted babies to the hospital or giving them up for adoption.

Read more here

dalsgaard said:

In order to even solve this problem, and as you can imagine - it is a problem, we have to create awareness. Awareness about the problems associated with the male gender in general. The extremely high suicidal numbers, the fathers that can’t see their children and still pay support, the misandryginist tendency in society, freedom of speech (This site almost got sued, remember?), false rape claims, and a hell lot of other important subjects. All of these topics, you’ll find in someway represented on this site.

Now here’s the point i was leading you to: In order to create awareness about these problems, you have to get attention. If this website was written in a clean way saying “We respect women, but we think that THIS thing does’nt work”, it would’nt get half the publicity the website is given at this moment. That is why this website is important to me. That is definetly why I support it.

I think people are already becoming aware if it. I’m doing some study at the moment and I came across a couple of recently published books that may interest some.

http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-047001573X.html

http://www.ubcpress.ca/search/title_book.asp?BookID=2695

Female, just piling bullshit upon same layered by texture, tone and odour a point does not make.

- a1 ozgur can - 84 shots (original)

Did you know that when Pythagorus opened his second university in 529BC that women were also able to enroll? There was no discrimation on the basis of gender or race or financial means or religion. It was truly egalitarian, apparently. Pity then that the standards set by visionaries such as Pythagorus did not continue to be the norm. In England, until the 1950s, a woman had no legal rights over herself, her property or her money. Men, by law, owned their family and all material possessions. A husband could even forcibly restrain his wife from leaving. If she did escape, he could use the law to have her imprisoned. Aside from premeditated murder, the law forced women and children to accept whatever behaviour and terms the man dictated, including beatings. In “Wife Torture in England” written by Francis Power Cobbe in 1878, she revalaed the horrific domestic violence occurring at the time that were apparently quite commonplace.

Do you wish to repeal todays laws back to this sorry state of affairs?

So why do men beat women? Are you saying that is it simply your right by virtue of your biology?

Heinrich Himmler said:

dear female, your heart is in the right place and there should probably be more women like you.

….*punches Himmler*

No. NO. HELL NO. There SHOULD be LESS women like her. No, none!! She is a plague, a plague amongst plagues actually. She should be hung, drawn and quartered.

Dont encourage her!

Female said:

Of course throwing a plate at the wall nowhere near where the man is standing is so much more violent than a man throwing his fist into a woman’s eye, disengaging the retina, breaking her nose and busting her lip, before jumping up and down on her and breaking her ribs and pelvis.

Silly me.
You are all so right.

blockquote>

dear female, your heart is in the right place and there should probably be more women like you. And i agree with your views on wife-beating, it shouldnt exist.

And yet IT DOES. And it has, throughout history. Hasnt it? Yes, it has. Theres no denying this simple truth. (Which is exactly why neither you nor hillary should ever be president, at least as long as i have a vote.) Wife beaters? Bah. They are monsters. Hideous, ugly, man-monsters. Female, i submit to you this simple logic: If there were no demand, there’d BE no supply. Wife beating works. As history shows beyond a shadow of a doubt, alot of Women are like mules, they wont listen until they’ve had a beating, and felt your power. They are exactly like iraqi insurgents, they will not submit to your logic until they are forced to do so. It just isnt in their nature. It is how they are wired by God or nature. I know you are refusing to believe the words you might be reading now but sure as God made men and women, my words are true. Not for every woman, God no and thank God for them or i wouldnt be here. (Whew! That woulda been awful.)

Desperate times call for desperate measures.

Sure, I get it, but that is because I’ve spent ample time engaged in arguments and discussions here. Many people (women especially) wont do that though, they will instead read one or two of Dick’s posts, then maybe some of the comments, which may turn out to be abusive ones rather than informative, then they’ll leave in disgust, convinced that men are more %^&* in the head than they had ever imagined.

Now, you can think that this site creates awareness all you want, I tend to think it just creates opposition and hostility. You wont get people on side by being abusive, it doesnt work that way. Take Billy and sots for instance, it is entirely clear that they have no interest in raising awareness or getting people to have sympathy for the male cause, they’re only interested in feeling sorry for themselves and taking that out on any and all of the female sex.

And this is where you are going to be wrong. Sometimes you have to call for desperate measures in order to have people recognize problems. When America engaged in the Iraq war, our danish prime minister was on his tiptoes trying to help America in the war, even though there were several minorities throughout the country suggesting another way to dissolve the crisis.

The problem is, that peoples meanings got ignored. Noone even took a second glance at the possible dangers ahead.

Then, as our prime minister left the press conference, someone threw a bucket of red paint over him screaming at the top of his lungs: “Anders Fogh, you got blood on your hands!”.

Now you may say what you want about the people humiliating our minister in that matter. But nonetheless, it spawned country-wide debate on the subject, and it created awareness. People started asking questions like never before.

People out there HAVE tried to be diplomatic. “Why does the head of our gender equality orginization have to be a woman?”. “Why is there only 3 male members, and 19 female members?”. These questions just does’nt sink in! They have no impact! Even though people KNOW that these are important questions, noone tells their friend about them.

THIS is a site that people will hear about. This is a movement that will increase in size, Dick is going to recieve a huge bill monthly because of all the men that will slowly join his movement because they recognize the subtle points in the comments and articles.

And at some point, it will get recognized. The question will come up in the media, wether it be “What’s wrong with these people?” or “These things are worth looking into” - we have awareness. And that’s what is more or less going to happen.

dalsgaard said:

But this is how you create said awareness. By reinforcing the stereotype that the media has put on to us. By being what people don’t want us to be, they’ll see in some way or another that there is a problem. Because there ARE some clever people out there, that CAN read between the lines.

I hope you get it.

Sure, I get it, but that is because I’ve spent ample time engaged in arguments and discussions here. Many people (women especially) wont do that though, they will instead read one or two of Dick’s posts, then maybe some of the comments, which may turn out to be abusive ones rather than informative, then they’ll leave in disgust, convinced that men are more %^&* in the head than they had ever imagined.

Now, you can think that this site creates awareness all you want, I tend to think it just creates opposition and hostility. You wont get people on side by being abusive, it doesnt work that way. Take Billy and sots for instance, it is entirely clear that they have no interest in raising awareness or getting people to have sympathy for the male cause, they’re only interested in feeling sorry for themselves and taking that out on any and all of the female sex.

That being said, i still do think that men are better than women. I think we’re a lot smarter, a lot more logical, and definetly better at reasoning. We are stronger, and more intelligent. In fact, i could’nt even imagine losing an argument with a woman.

The problem is though, that i can’t say this. I can’t state that i have these oppinions publicly. That is freedom of speech.

Female said:

I thought my answer was fairly practical and realistic, but fine.

If you reported a scratched arm or face, or whatever, to a doctor and said that you received the injuries from your wife, then I’m sure the doctor would raise an eyebrow and treat the wound, advising you if it looked infected and how you should look after it, and possibly tell you if you needed stitches or recommend a plastic surgeon.

If the doctor isn’t in a rush or practices in a holistic, rather than purely pragmatic manner, then he or she may ask you if your wife accidently scratched you. If you decide to reveal that it was deliberate, then the doctor may ask more questions trying to ascertain whether this is a regular thing, whether you have any other injuries, whether your wife has any injuries that should be treated, whether you have children, whether they may be at risk of harm, etc. These questions are designed to ellicit information on what is happening so that people are protected. From themselves, if necessary. Not so people can be punished or blamed, but protected. There is a difference. But if men wont admit that they need help or assistance or even protection, then of course it wont be able to be forthcoming. Next the doctor may ask you if your wife has a mental illness or a history of MI in her family or is on a drug rehabilitation program, or whether you are on the latter. If your answer to all these questions was “no” then depending on your demeanour, the doctor might light-heartedly ask you, “so what did you do to deserve this?” while possibly suspecting that you receieved the injuries after your wife found out you were involved with another woman.

If the situation was reversed and your wife visited the doctor, then I’m fairly certain that a similiar scenerio would play out but with more information offered to the woman on women’s refuges, and perhaps without the question, “so what did you do to deserve this?”

The slightly different interactions do reflect cultural assumptions that as women are physically weaker than men, that women cannot seriously hurt men and, that if a woman does injure a man, then he must have provoked her, most likely by having an affair. However, the average professional is going to know that it is bullshit that women cannot inflict serious injuries AND that physial violence enacted by anyone, male or female, is not indicative of a normal relationship spat, but is indicative of either, 1. cultural context - those raised in more violent neighbourhoods are raised in a tougher manner and this is somewhat of a cultural norm or 2. drugs or alcohol is involved or 3. psychological illness is involved. The professional would take all the information from your story into account to ascertain which of these applied and act accordingly, informing you of relevant resource services and options in your area (maybe a men’s support group or the number of a social worker). The professional who does not do any of these things is not upholding their code of ethics and you should discontinue seeking treatment from that particular doctor.

We’re not talking individual situations for fucks sake. We’re talking crowds, the population in general.

In order for them to take these problems seriously, and really put them into consideration we need a global change of heart on these topics. And HOW would you accomplish that?

Sure, if I had problems in the said relation to my goddamn doctor, i may or may not be able to convince him that my wife beat me. And there would be differences between the scenarios, and quite frankly, i can also agree that a professional doctor should behave in the manner you presented.

This is completely hypothetical, what I’m trying to show you is a clear way how to alter the common mans belief in society and gender as we know it. Why is that necessary? Because as it is now, men that are beaten, recieves scratches, or are victims to either physical or psychological abuse would’nt even visit the doctor in the first place - in fear of ridicule.

In order to even solve this problem, and as you can imagine - it is a problem, we have to create awareness. Awareness about the problems associated with the male gender in general. The extremely high suicidal numbers, the fathers that can’t see their children and still pay support, the misandryginist tendency in society, freedom of speech (This site almost got sued, remember?), false rape claims, and a hell lot of other important subjects. All of these topics, you’ll find in someway represented on this site.

Now here’s the point i was leading you to: In order to create awareness about these problems, you have to get attention. If this website was written in a clean way saying “We respect women, but we think that THIS thing does’nt work”, it would’nt get half the publicity the website is given at this moment. That is why this website is important to me. That is definetly why I support it.

And I’m pretty sure everyone else agrees on this matter. People don’t beat their wives. They don’t disrespect women, and they definetly do NOT hate them as much as they say they do in here. But this is how you create said awareness. By reinforcing the stereotype that the media has put on to us. By being what people don’t want us to be, they’ll see in some way or another that there is a problem. Because there ARE some clever people out there, that CAN read between the lines.

I hope you get it.