Women Hate Babies
Women hate children.
Remember that book Hillary Clinton wrote called “It takes a Village to Raise a Child”? I don’t know if that was the exact title. It’s not important enough of a thing for me to remember in that manner of detail. That was the point though; that women can’t raise children on their own. They need help and more importantly they need men.
Remember that movie Three Men and a Baby? I do remember that title exactly because that was a good fucking movie. What was the moral of that movie?
Men don’t need shit to raise shit — babies.
Women fucking suck at raising children. Men can raise children, work full time jobs, maintain hobbies like drinking and bowling, and all while saving time to chase tail. That’s because men are men. We’re better parents and when it comes to living life we’re like octopuses on crack; our tentacles in one hundred different pies.
Women hate babies and children. That’s why women love little dogs so much — because they’re all fucking sick.
Want to know how you’ve really pissed off a woman? One good way to know is that fucking her isn’t like fucking a futon. She’s still terrible at it, but don’t feel bad about giving her credit for enthusiasm. Women need all the charity they can get.
Another good way to know if you’ve gotten under a woman’s skin is if she’s speaking to you like a child. When women are yelling and screaming, that’s about a 5 on the feminine anger scale. A 1 on the scale is the silent treatment. That lasts for about a week or until said woman figures out that’s the dumbest fucking way on Earth to show a man you’re upset with him. That’s like heaven to a man. It also has never lasted less than a week.
When a woman is talking to you like a child — very patronizingly and almost giddy with a repressed psycho-mania — that’s when you know you’ve pissed her off. By the way, that’s also when you know she’s about ten seconds away from pulling your pants off. That’s information you can use at your discretion.
That’s why women shouldn’t be allowed to raise babies on their own. They hate babies. Women treat people they hate the same way they treat children — patronizing and bubbly. Men don’t ever pull that kind of shit. When a man is upset, he calmly, cooly, and sternly explains himself. Men treat babies differently than people they hate. That’s what I’m saying here.
It’s a myth that women like babies. They just want to have them. They want to have babies like they want to have purses and Starbuck’s. The only difference is you can’t sell babies on eBay.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 14 … 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 [3] 2 1 » Show All
If you women would occasionally pause for breath mid-rant, it wouldn’t happen so often.
The Enter key is your friend. Use it.
Well, thankyou for that, I realised after I had posted it that it did look like as you say, a wall of text , but seriously, I don’t do this normally. I’m not used to blogs and or typing in small boxes, normally have the whole screen to see my work laid out!! I’ll get there, and thanks,it all helps:-)
Wall of text? No thanks!
par‧a‧graph 
Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[par-uh-graf, -grahf]
–noun 1. a distinct portion of written or printed matter dealing with a particular idea, usually beginning with an indentation on a new line.
2. a paragraph mark.
3. a note, item, or brief article, as in a newspaper.
–verb (used with object) 4. to divide into paragraphs.
5. to write or publish paragraphs about, as in a newspaper.
6. to express in a paragraph.
If you want a fashion accessory, go buy a fag-bag or a fluffy small animal. This is a human life thats at stake here, not something to fill your biological void with!!
You were never meant to produce, THATS A FACT, and until the human species develops the capacity to do so unaffiliated with the same sex, then you should refrain!!
Hi guys, I’m back with another question….
If you read my post clearly, you would see that I said a single mother should not get IVF treatment.
She is intentionally sabotaging her child’s welfare
OBVIOUSLY in cases when the father leaves, gets killed or such there is no other choice.
Why do you feminists bring up silly scenarios to move the argument away from what I am saying.
Stick to the point here, IVF treatment
No, I was actually referring to someone else’s commentary which more or less implied woman shouldn’t be allowed nor are capable of raising children alone without a father present. Actually, the title of the threads article was indeed “Woman hate children” not “should gay people be allowed to procreate.” who’s off-topic? Someone asked the question, “What are all these femmos doing here?”, (I’m not a feminist ) ….. well when you make such barbaric statements as these, what did you expect? You expected woman to respond abusively did you not? Which in turn would hopefully validate your perceived point, and demonstrate them for the nasty abusive child loathing things they are. If this is how the majority of woman are and behave then why the need to set a trap? …. Now obviously where necessity dictates some situations are unavoidable, though just wanted to point out that both men and woman alike are capable of doing a fine job with raising their kids alone, and that in the majority of cases their circumstances shouldn’t be held against them and used to denigrate their role particularly when they need all the encouragement they can get. I have a friend who is currently living with her ex, (been separated for many years though ) and wont ask him to leave because she feels this enormous pressure to keep the family together, and guilt at the prospect of her depriving her children of a dad, and him of his children. Now, she has made a pact with herself to keep this arrangement in place until her youngest is at least 16 years old, however there are many many, many out there who think she is unnecessarily depriving herself and is doing the wrong thing allowing him to stay. I guess what I’m saying is, not too many people deliberately set out to achieve family dysfunction, it’s a sad thing for either sex when this occurs, and is not something one normally sets out to achieve on purpose, except in situations whereby singles and gays deliberately set out to go against the grain and achieve familial dysfunction of course. Raising kids in a household with two same sexed parents is dysfunctional, FULL STOP. It’s neither functional nor desirable and has been statistically documented my numerous family organizations world wide that these family’s are far more likely to endure poverty, neglect and abuse compared to those raised in a more traditional, and more socially in-tune hetero- household. Now whilst single parents don’t normally set out to achieve familial break-down and dysfunction, well in most cases anyway, these either selfish or ignorant same sex wanna-be family’s differ in that they deliberately set out to achieve what is by most peoples standards considered to be an undesirable and socially unacceptable basis in which to raise a family. In other words one cant compare the dysfunction nor feasibility of a single parent household to those who are homosexual and whom willingly set out to create their dysfunctional environment , knowing full well their children are more likely to suffer as a result of their premeditated and deliberate actions. Single parenting is far from a desirable arrangement, who would argue this? Not even they would as most wish they weren’t in their often difficult predicament, wish things had have been different, femo-Nazis aside of course!!! However gay parents who deliberately set out to procreate don’t see their predicament to be in anyway dysfunctional or undesirable, rather are of this impression that they are capable of giving their offspring everything a normal heterosexual family has to offer, don’t believe they need to conform to socially accepted norms and or conform to societal expectation. Rather believe they are special, illuminated even, and simply don’t have to conform, even at the sufferance of their children who they know will be forced to endure the ridicule and shame they themselves did . Now, you might say, well, hetero kids can come from dysfunctional family’s, they get bullied, they have issues too, but your missing the part where A: In most cases, heterosexuals go into it with the best intentions, are doing what they are biologically programmed to do and what is socially acceptable in accordance with our society B: People abuse their kids every day , and fuck up and make bad decisions, does this mean you can too?
Children aren’t toys!!!
Deliberately setting out to create an undesirable/dysfunctional family setting is in my book a form of neglect, in that you are in violation of your most primary role as a parent, of which is to do your very best to ensure they receive the best possible start in life, not create hurdles for them before they have even learned how to walk.
Sure, shit happens, but you don’t set out to make it happen just cos someone else does?
But what I meant was that economic factors affect families and laws/public policy affect financial matters that then impact on families. For instance, family payments/child support/any form that asks you if and how many dependents you have, etc.
This is a profoundly silly argument. You control for those things, and you examine statistical correlations in large datasets.
It’s almost as bad as saying you couldn’t correlate GRID to homosexuality back in the early ’80’s because sodomy was illegal in parts of the country, and there wasn’t a standardisation of public policy between (say) promiscuous homosexual practice and (say) monogamous heterosexual practice.
-wolfe
No, I havent seen any stats. Whether they exist or not, I dont know. Do you? According to this link, it is estimated there are between 1 - 10 mil children living in same sex families in the US, so it is possible that studies are being done on future outcomes.
http://aapnews.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/e2006217v1
These studies would be good to see but of course even if the children are perceived as growing to adulthood and having a less favourable outcome than children in same sex couples, you would have to consider how public policy influences the financial picture of in each and what kind of neg or pos. effect different laws for each have. I dont believe you could do an adequate study on how sexual orientation in family affects children and their later outcomes until laws and public policy are first standardised towards all families because economics have a huge influence, like it or not.
ROFL
Got a reference for your 6x greater chance of being molested by a homosexual theory?
And as far as the recessive trait thing goes, it would eventually be pulled out of society for the same reason.
Just as Geneticists are predicting the blonde hair gene will disappear in a short few generations, it is ALSO recessive. And unlike the homosexual gene has no bearing on survival and does not realy hinder it’s own passage.
Genetically speaking there are no biological advantages to having multiple homosexual genes linked in some strange fashion.
There are many genes that humans have lost along the way. One of them is a tail. Most primates have a large tail, the information for that is lost in humans, we no longer have tails. Tails were a deteriment if you don’t live in trees since if you ever played football with a baggy shirt you would know your predators could easily cathc you from behind on the ground.
If there is a homosexuality gene, please submit the sequence to GENBANK at http://www.pubmed.com
Then I will be happy to discuss it with you. I myself have submitted several genes to GenBANK and the RCSB protein database and am very familiar with the process.
Also homosexuals are 6x more likely to be child molesters than heterosexuals.
Thus if I found out my children wanted to go to a sleepover to some boys’ house whose parents are gay, I would not let him go and I would explain biology and sexual deviants to him if I had not already done so.
Any god parent would be hesitant of letting their kids do something that VASTLY increase their chances of being raped, molested or killed. Obviously you can’t shelter your children from everything, but why make them go through unnecessary risks.
I mean I wouldn’t arm my child and send them to IRAQ, so why would I put them into a situation where their chance of being molested is MUCH higher than at a heterosexual household.
Sure it can happen there too, but 6 times less likely.
If you read my post clearly, you would see that I said a single mother should not get IVF treatment.
She is intentionally sabotaging her child’s welfare
OBVIOUSLY in cases when the father leaves, gets killed or such there is no other choice.
Why do you feminists bring up silly scenarios to move the argument away from what I am saying.
Stick to the point here, IVF treatment
Holy fuck did this turn into girl talk or something?
come on dick your losing man pooints for letting these feminists speak too much on your site, I thought this was mabtw.com and not bitchtalk.com.
yours truelly
Intolerant Redneck.
I agree.
MelC. I’m not sure if you’ve quietened down because you’ve hit your daily suggested quota or whether I was overly assertive towards you.
You sound like an alright person and I’m not trying to judge or flame you (though I’d like it if you didn’t use so many emoticons).
The way I see it is like this. Yes, children of gay parents will be more likely to be judged/teased/ostracized, however, as long as the child’s parents give more than enough support and love and teach the child that there is nothing wrong with their own family, but there is something wrong with the family of the child who is doing the bullying, then the bullied child may be able to overcome the bullying and perhaps teach the bullies a thing or two. And when I say something is wrong with the bully’s family, of course, I don’t mean the structure of the family. I mean the people who compose it.
Difference exists, it always has and always will and people who cannot accept it are simply scared of it. I don’t believe that attempting to sanction or remove it would actually work. The only thing that could possibly be changed is people’s attitudes towards difference, which can only be achieved through confrontation. Doesn’t have to be bad confrontation…exposure might be a better word.
Horror. That’s a difference that simply isn’t right. Or perhaps DM believes I am wrong in this opinion as well.
Well as per my observation, kids with average heterosexual parents can grow up to be bullied and rejected by society. Such children can be the most ill-adjusted, screwed up and mentally dwarfed children without the ’stigma’ of homosexuality.
In my view it depends on the style of parenting not necessarily on the sexuality of the parents or social stigma.
Female is wrong again. What a surprise. She’s so wrong another woman can spot it!
-Dick
I’m not sure what you are asking me. My comments were with respect to gay couples having children. You said you didn’t agree. I disagreed based on personal observation that children of gay couples can be raised perfectly well. Yes, they may be judged by other people but then tell me who is able to get away without being judged by anyone? I probably get judged 50 times a day simply based on the knee high boots I like to wear to work. Big deal.
Yes, children of gay parents may come up against more barriers to social inclusion, but although that may become a problem for them, it is ultimately a problem for the person who judges them. It will at least do their gay parents a big favour by informing them relatively quickly which other children in the playground have prejudiced, narrow minded parents.
I thing the old bags a selfish disgrace, and that our absolutely right. She’ll be lucky to whiteness it’s 21 birthday, is she grappling onto her begotten youth or what?
No excuses!!!
Having a baby at this age is medically unsafe and stupid, never would I support this gross demonstration of utter selfishness from either gender~
And female, in this day and age, kids need a lot more than love to get them through!!!!!! Your friends kids aren’t out of the woods yet, have you seen any stats re- how well these kids fair btw?
Here, have a look. Closer.
The corpse walking with the kid.
Bottom line? Women are selfish. That old hag spawned at 66. Unnaturally of course. Lives alone, evidently.
Having IVF with one foot in the grave, how’s that for ensuring misery and ostracisation for a child(a girl)? Wait, it gets better. Women are very hysterically supportive of the old witch. Just stop one the street and ask.
That’s gonna be one warped little kid. Oh, wait. It’s a girl. I take that back, she’ll be perfectly normal, well developed both physically and mentally.
God save us and deliver us from the sanity of women.
Female, what you doing here? Strayed while foraging for bamboo again?