Why Women Hate Sex With Me

Women absolutely hate having sex with me. Sometimes, before the “doing it” even starts, they want it to be over. After a roll in the hay with yours truly, a woman feels dirty, degraded, disgusted, damaged, demeaned, and most importantly, sore as fuck.

They hate it. And after a week, she’ll feel even worse.

Yet years later, this same woman won’t be able to turn it down. She’ll cancel plans for it. She’ll lie to her best friends for it. Stand back. Dick Masterson is about to blow your mind with some Man Zen.

Women hate sex and are also simultaneously addicted to it.

When it comes to understanding women, it’s important to remember one thing: women are not men. Women couldn’t be men if they tried. Could you imagine a bunch of women hoisting an American flag on the hilltops of Iwo Jima? I could. But only if they were all in bikinis and it was like that 70’s movie Heavy Metal.

1. All women hate sex.
2. All women are cheating whores.
3. If you think that’s a contradiction, you’re either a woman, a virgin, or you’re wasting your time pleasuring women for no reason. That’s a loss of Man Points.

Women are supposed to hate sex.

Women like to be ignored because they don’t want to feel the pressure of having to say something smart. Imagine a five pound bag packed with ten pounds of shit. That’s a woman’s brain. It’s under an extreme amount of pressure, and full of more shit than it can handle. When you let a woman know that her brain is not what’s important to you, you’re dumping out all that shit and bringing her some sweet relief.

Nothing in Cosmo is meant to make women smarter. So don’t appreciate a woman for something she’s not trying to be. No one hires a prostitute to play Hamlet. No man wants to fuck a woman to make her feel good. When I take a shit, I don’t ask the toilet why it seems distracted.

Women don’t want to be pleasured in bed. They want to be used like a tool. It’s how they’ve evolved. Treating a woman like crap is not like treating a man like crap. Women need it to feel good about themselves.

Men base our self-worth on the money we make, the ass we kick, and number of people’s opinions we don’t give a fuck about. Women, however, base their self-worth on how much pleasure they bring men. That’s why Paris Hilton is so popular among women and why make-up exists. That’s why women worship Tinkerbelle. She can make men fly.

And she doesn’t have to take a shower afterwards.

The truth is, if a woman doesn’t hate sex with you, you’re doing it wrong. Yes, women hate sex. Yes, women hate sex with me — especially with me. And yes, women are all whores.

That’s Man Zen.

Women only deserve anal.

Related Articles:

222 Responses to “Why Women Hate Sex With Me”

Pages: « 13 4 5 [6] 7 8 912 » Show All

  1. amvet1948 Says:

    “Women only deserve anal”

    Ain’t that the truth.

  2. JJ Says:

    Sandunguera said:

    Joshua Killfoil said:

    I’m guessing, Dick, that based on your comments about women’s brains being comparable to a bag of fecal matter, you would say something to the effect that “men are more logical than women”. Do you know what formal logic is, sir? If not, allow me to demonstrate. As a syllogistic argument, here’s how the opinions expressed in your article would look:

    Dick’s Premises:
    ————–
    A person has sex with another person multiple times if and only if he/she likes how they are treated during sex
    I have had sex with a few women
    I have been cruel and violent to them during the acts
    Some of these same women have had sex with me multiple times
    Some women like to be treated with cruelty and violence during sex
    ————————
    Dick’s Conclusion:
    ————————
    All women like to be treated with cruelty and violence during sex
    ——–

    As I’m sure you’re intuitively aware of your argument in this way, you’ll have to pardon the redundancy. What you’re probably not aware of is why, aside from being evil as fuck, it’s a whole trough of horse shit. Let me show you a simpler, analogous argument to demonstrate your dumbass-fuckery:

    Premises:
    ——————
    If a person is an illogical, hateful prick, then he/she is a douchebag.
    Dick Masterson is illogical.
    Dick Masterson is a hateful prick.
    Dick Masterson is a man.
    ——————
    Conclusion:
    ——————
    All men are douchebags.
    ——

    This argument contains the tacit premise: If any person of a specific gender is a douchebag, then every member of that gender is a douchebag.

    This assumption is obviously false, and thus the argument is rendered unsound (being internally consistent, but ultimately false). Just because one man is a douchebag doesn’t mean that all men are, you silly, silly man! Let me show how to make this argument valid AND SOUND!

    Premises:
    —————-
    If a person is an illogical, hateful prick, then he/she is a douchebag.
    Dick Masterson is illogical.
    Dick Masterson is a hateful prick.
    —————
    Conclusion:
    —————
    Dick Masterson is a douchebag.
    ——-

    See we have reached the conclusion “Dick Masterson is a douchebag” by very logically respecting the flow of explicit premises 1-3, therefore it is a valid argument. And we know for a positive fact that Dick Masterson is indeed a douchebag–so our argument is sound as well!

    Let’s go back to the original argument

    Dick’s Premises:
    ——————–
    A person has sex with another person multiple times if and only if he/she likes how they are treated during sex
    I have had sex with a few women
    I have been cruel and violent to them during the acts
    Some of these same women have had sex with me multiple times
    Some women like to be treated with cruelty and violence during sex
    ——————–
    Dick’s Conclusion:
    ———————
    All women like to be treated with cruelty and violence during sex
    ——-

    This argument implicitly contains the obviously false tacit premise: If some people of a certain gender like violence and cruelty during sex, then all people of the same gender like violence and cruelty during sex.

    Further, the assumption stating that “A person has sex with another person multiple times if and only if he/she likes how they are treated during sex” is the statement of a person who has lived in a cave their whole life such that phrases like “modern psychology” or “abusive relationship” are completely unintelligible.

    The argument presented here contains one or more false premises and is therefore invalid and unsound (inconsistent and false).

    But hey! Enough of my yakkin’! I’ll leave you with one final syllogism to ponder (Hint: it is both valid and sound!):

    Premises:
    ——————–
    The fewer douchebags there are in the world, the better it is to live in.
    One should always do what is best for the world.
    Dick Masterson is a douchebag.
    If Dick Masterson killed himself, there would be fewer douchebags in the world.
    ——————–
    Conclusions:
    ——————–
    If Dick Masterson killed himself, the world would be a better place.
    [and finally]
    Dick Masterson should kill himself.
    ——-

    I rest my case.

    This website is not “a place for men to vent”. It’s a place where a hateful dumbass can start a circle jerk with hordes of other hateful dumbasses without having to actually touch another man’s penis.

    You’re my hero.

    You’re my hero too.

  3. Dutch269 Says:

    levi said:

    No wonder women dont want to have sex with you - you cant even do it right. Sex is based on the ability to remember that there is more than one person in the room. You are no doubt a chronic masturbator. You wear dark glasses because you are ultimately ashamed of who you are. You proclaim violently that you are better than women because men intimidate you, and you need someone to bully. You started this website because, by allowing men to vent against their women in a momentary rush of emotion - which is supposed to be a womanish trait, by the way - you find comfort in thinking that there are more people like you. You believe that all women are weak and clingy because that is the type of woman trash like you attracts. You have carefully developed your persona, with all the pomp and confidence that seems to go with it, but if you are honest with yourself you will find that a lot of it is just an act. You are really just a bundle of nerves and hormones, just like the women you claim to be better than. You ultimately are just trying to convince yourself more than anybody. If anyone calls you out on any valid point on this website, you just resort to calling them a woman. Your entire premise is made of bland statements that could never really be proven but make you feel a heck of a lot better. I am a man, and proud of it - I like boobs just as much as the next guy - but I can honestly say that by continuing this quest, you are guilty of the narrow-mindedness that you accuse women of, and you are embarrassing me and any other true red-blooded male that knows of you. It’s funny - you call yourself the true man, when the reality is you are working harder than any of us to prove you are not a woman. Do not attempt to say that I am making things up - the preceeding statements have just as much validity as anything you have come up with on this site. My advice to you is to grow to maturity, learn a few things about real life, and then you might have something worthy to put on this website.

    Wow, you have just proven everything Dick has said…geezz you women just don’t know when to shut the fuk up. This is a business venture, and he won, and you just can’t seem to understand that.

    Obviously Dick has learned a few things in life before making this website, that’s why he’s making money from his book and was featured on Dr. Phil, have you ever been on a talk show?

    And all the insults about being gay and not ever getting laid, this is the lamest tactic by you females, and it only proves how fukin stupid you are. Don’t you get it by now?!

    Men no longer feel the pressure and shame of not having a women. Have you not heard of the Marriage Boycott? Have you seen the falling marriage rates lately?

    It’s over bitch, the free ride is over. You made your bed, get used to it. Now you females have NO CHOICE but to support yourselves, were going back to having fun and living our lives, not chained to some foul-mouthed, diamond hoarding, lazy princess.

    For every princess bitch like you, there are a dozen women who will fuck me just to take a ride in my boat. My house, my toys, my brand new truck, will never be at the mercy of a spitefull, immature gold digger such as yourself.

    Thanks for stopping by, glad we could offend you.

  4. Dutch269 Says:

    Joshua Killfoil said:

    This website is not “a place for men to vent”. It’s a place where a hateful dumbass can start a circle jerk with hordes of other hateful dumbasses without having to actually touch another man’s penis.

    And the biggest hypocrytical statement of all, and almost as common as the “You must be gay” or “You must have a small penis” insults.

    Women gossip and vent about men all day long, everyday. It’s in thier mags, it’s in there books, it’s on thier talk shows, they can’t get enough!

    But when men do it, somehow, it all becomes wrong.

    Pathetic…..

  5. Talon Says:

    Joshua Killfoil said:

    I’m guessing, Dick, that based on your comments about women’s brains being comparable to a bag of fecal matter, you would say something to the effect that “men are more logical than women”. Do you know what formal logic is, sir? If not, allow me to demonstrate. As a syllogistic argument, here’s how the opinions expressed in your article would look:

    Dick’s Premises:
    ————–
    A person has sex with another person multiple times if and only if he/she likes how they are treated during sex
    I have had sex with a few women
    I have been cruel and violent to them during the acts
    Some of these same women have had sex with me multiple times
    Some women like to be treated with cruelty and violence during sex
    ————————
    Dick’s Conclusion:
    ————————
    All women like to be treated with cruelty and violence during sex
    ——–

    As I’m sure you’re intuitively aware of your argument in this way, you’ll have to pardon the redundancy.

    As I am sure you are aware, possesing such formal logical abilities as yourself, you are creating premises that you cannot prove.

    Joshua’s premises:
    Dick is arguing without logical coherency.
    Joshua can predict what Dick is thinking, and deduce his premises despite not having proof for any of these (or the ability to correctly deduce these) other than an “ad-hominem” insult.
    Joshua thinks he can use these (unproven) premises to argue his case.

    Joshua’s conclusion:
    Joshua is using flawless logic, and proves that Dick’s logic is flawed beyond all doubt.

    My conclusion:
    Joshua’s logic is flawed.

    Shall we move on?

    What you’re probably not aware of is why, aside from being evil as fuck, it’s a whole trough of horse shit. Let me show you a simpler, analogous argument to demonstrate your dumbass-fuckery:

    Premises:
    ——————
    If a person is an illogical, hateful prick, then he/she is a douchebag.
    Dick Masterson is illogical.
    Dick Masterson is a hateful prick.
    Dick Masterson is a man.
    ——————
    Conclusion:
    ——————
    All men are douchebags.
    ——

    This argument contains the tacit premise: If any person of a specific gender is a douchebag, then every member of that gender is a douchebag.

    This assumption is obviously false, and thus the argument is rendered unsound (being internally consistent, but ultimately false). Just because one man is a douchebag doesn’t mean that all men are, you silly, silly man! Let me show how to make this argument valid AND SOUND!

    Premises:
    —————-
    If a person is an illogical, hateful prick, then he/she is a douchebag.
    Dick Masterson is illogical.
    Dick Masterson is a hateful prick.
    —————
    Conclusion:
    —————
    Dick Masterson is a douchebag.
    ——-

    Joshua’s premises:

    If a person is an illogical, hateful prick, then he/she is a douchebag.
    Dick Masterson is illogical.
    Dick Masterson is a hateful prick.

    Joshua’s conclusion:
    This argument is valid.

    My conclusion:
    Joshua are using subjectively defined premises (non-objective, impossible to prove) (bolded) to argue his case.
    Joshua’s argument is, therefore, invalid.

    Next?

    See we have reached the conclusion “Dick Masterson is a douchebag” by very logically respecting the flow of explicit premises 1-3, therefore it is a valid argument. And we know for a positive fact that Dick Masterson is indeed a douchebag–so our argument is sound as well!

    Let’s go back to the original argument

    Dick’s Premises:
    ——————–
    A person has sex with another person multiple times if and only if he/she likes how they are treated during sex
    I have had sex with a few women
    I have been cruel and violent to them during the acts
    Some of these same women have had sex with me multiple times
    Some women like to be treated with cruelty and violence during sex
    ——————–
    Dick’s Conclusion:
    ———————
    All women like to be treated with cruelty and violence during sex
    ——-

    This argument implicitly contains the obviously false tacit premise: If some people of a certain gender like violence and cruelty during sex, then all people of the same gender like violence and cruelty during sex.

    Further, the assumption stating that “A person has sex with another person multiple times if and only if he/she likes how they are treated during sex” is the statement of a person who has lived in a cave their whole life such that phrases like “modern psychology” or “abusive relationship” are completely unintelligible.

    The argument presented here contains one or more false premises and is therefore invalid and unsound (inconsistent and false).

    My premises:
    Joshua claims (again) that Dicks premises, and thus his argument, are untrue.
    Joshua is still using make-believe (a.k.a. subjective; read previous entry) premises.
    Joshua is still using flawed argumentation.
    Joshua is also using a straw man fallacy (bolded).

    My conclusion:
    Joshua is commiting logical fallacies.
    Joshua is still using flawed argumentation.

    But hey! Enough of my yakkin’! I’ll leave you with one final syllogism to ponder (Hint: it is both valid and sound!):

    Premises:
    ——————–
    The fewer douchebags there are in the world, the better it is to live in.
    One should always do what is best for the world.
    Dick Masterson is a douchebag.
    If Dick Masterson killed himself, there would be fewer douchebags in the world.
    ——————–
    Conclusions:
    ——————–
    If Dick Masterson killed himself, the world would be a better place.
    [and finally]
    Dick Masterson should kill himself.
    ——-

    I rest my case.

    Joshua’s premises:
    The fewer douchebags there are in the world, the better it is to live in.
    One should always do what is best for the world.
    Dick Masterson is a douchebag.
    If Dick Masterson killed himself, there would be fewer douchebags in the world.

    Joshua’s conclusion:
    Dick Masterson should commit suicide

    My premises:
    Joshua is assuming his argumentation is “both valid and sound”.
    Joshua is using subjectively defined premises (read; premise one, two and three).
    Joshua’s final premise relies on premise three to be correct (or possible to prove), which is not the case.

    My conclusion:
    All Joshua’s premises are incorrect.
    Joshua is doing it (read; argumentation, logic) wrong.
    Joshua’s assumption (his arguemnt being valid and sound) is incorrect.
    Joshua should consider using objectively (and/or logically) deduceable and proveable premises if he/she wishes to not appear as an individual who is pulling incorrect conclusions out of his/her ass.

    I end your case.

    This website is not “a place for men to vent”. It’s a place where a hateful dumbass can start a circle jerk with hordes of other hateful dumbasses without having to actually touch another man’s penis.

    My premises:
    Joshua is resorting to ad-hominem.
    Joshua is assuming that “hordes of other hateful dumbasses” visit this site, which cannot be objectively defined.
    Joshua’s previous assumption is vauge.

    My conclusion:
    Joshua does not deserve to be disproven with logical arguments, as he himself are not willing to refrain from logical fallacies.
    Joshuas assumption that he can teach others about correctly applied logic
    is false.

  6. Guido Says:

    I think that Dick is starting to lose steam. I have enjoyed reading his material for about the last year now, and I have noticed a decline in the quality of his published material for the last month — month and a half. Ever since he’s gotten off the Dr. Phil show he doesn’t seem to have too much to say. Women want to be ignored, women need constant attention seems a lil contradictory to me but not a huge deal. I need something new, and something fresh. These latest articles don’t really seem to make much a point anymore.

  7. Jim Says:

    LOL- “Whenever you think your right in your post above, you are wrong. You know nothing.”

    It’s you’re, not your. Funny, you sure felt the need to post a response longer and far less eloquent than a 14 year old who “knows nothing”.

    I’m trying to help the 14 year old because he needs to start thinking. He’s too young to have these opinions, because sure as hell he got them from somewhere, and didn’t make them up himself.

    And by the way, picking up someone’s little spelling mistake is just petty and stupid. If that’s the only thing you could find wrong with my post then why not give a compliment instead of nitpicking like that?

  8. Danielle Says:

    Geeza said:

    Cav said:

    I Agree with you, ‘None of your Business’. I’m not saying that us men are better or worse than women, but EQUAL!
    I know you have a right to voice your oppinion, but like ‘None of your Business’ said, Women make up about half of the Global Population. Get with it and start acting your age not your shoe size! You can tell me the same if you want but I’d only be going back 3 years, compared to your 30 or so!
    You do need to get a life and stop sitting around moping like some Emo twat becasue he can’t get a decent gf.
    And as for working hard. What do you do away from this website?
    Hate’s such a strong word but in this case I think it’s suitable. I Hate people like you, that bully their rights to say what they think and insult 3 or so BILLION people, human beings, people that have feelings aswell, not things that you throw away into the back of your wardrobe (Closet or whatever it is in America). One of those skeletons you hope you wont find. Grow Up! Get A Life!! And Get Some Decency And Just Admit You’re A Twat And Shut Down The Website!!!

    FFS.

    Get a grip woman. Your macara is running.

    Haha did you mean MASCARA? You men claim to be so much better than women, but you can’t even spell a simple word? Funny.

  9. curiosity doesn't hurt Says:

    While I watch you on TV and I read your website, one thing keeps repeating itself in my head. On Dr. Phil, you said you didn’t hate women. What is the difference between your feelings and views on women and feminists and hatred?

  10. youarenotmanly Says:

    If you are doing a woman in the ass you are no man. You are a loser and homosexual. Real men like pussy. If you do any woman in the ass you might as well get with your gay MGTOW pals as that is what that group is into. If non-sodomites want to go to a real man’s website then they should go to americanwomensuck.com

  11. Geeza Says:

    Danielle said:

    Haha did you mean MASCARA? You men claim to be so much better than women, but you can’t even spell a simple word? Funny.

    I was wondering when one of you moronic estrogen laden feminuts would assume a typing error to be a spelling mistake.

    Men do not apply a plethora of shit to their faces like women do so I could hardly care less how it is spelt.

  12. Danielle Says:

    Geeza said:

    Danielle said:

    Haha did you mean MASCARA? You men claim to be so much better than women, but you can’t even spell a simple word? Funny.

    I was wondering when one of you moronic estrogen laden feminuts would assume a typing error to be a spelling mistake.

    Men do not apply a plethora of shit to their faces like women do so I could hardly care less how it is spelt.

    Actually, I don’t apply a ‘plethora of shit’ to my face. I put on lip gloss, I didn’t realize it was such a bad thing to have dry lips, but if you seem to think so then ok! I’d like to hear your opinion on gay men, some of them apply make-up. What does that make them? Are they Gods to you because they choose not to fuck women?

  13. Patti Says:

    Holy crap, this is actually funny. At first I was pissed, but after reading the above I’m just sitting here snickering, feeling like I’ve just spied on the blog rant of an acne-ridden 14 year old chronic masturbator with skidmarks in his panties who’s utterly terrified of women. Clever way to find fame and fortune - by tapping into the vast ocean of male fears and insecurities.

    Dear Men: If a man has to denigrate more than half the world’s population to make himself (and his gender) look and feel better (and recruit other men/sheep to do this with him), then he’s not a man - he’s just another opportunistic fame-whore, and we already have too many of those in the world. Don’t let this fella think for you, or tell you that your daughters, sisters and mothers are nothing more than retarded human toilets. If you don’t know better than that, then you’re still just a scared little boy.

  14. Dutch269 Says:

    Awwww.. come on Patti what’s wrong? Surely you believe in equal rights.. yes?

    Then you won’t mind us men talking shit about you women, just like you women talk shit about us men. It’s nothing more, and nothing less.

    Perhaps you should take another look at the Feminist agenda, they say much worse than any guy here did.

    But you already know that, hypocrite….

  15. Rethink yourselves Says:

    It’s rather narrow-minded that any of the guys that support this Dick character feel the way they do about all women. I’ll be the first to say that some women are gold diggers, some women are prostitutes, some women like to be talked down to (I believe it’s called masochism) and some women are far from self-reliant. But to say that these represent the entire gender is a very illogical conclusion to come to.

    Chances are the successful, self-reliant women that Dick and his friends seem to think are non-existent simply don’t want to associate with them. Because they will probably never be at the types of functions these men go to (and therefore will never meet them), Dick et. al just assume that they don’t exist. If you go to a bar where middle-class women fed on “Sex and the City” and Cosmo get drunk and look for a fling, that’s going to be all you know of women. These women, who embody the negative stereotype that Dick and co. are perpetuating as fact, are hardly representative of an entire gender of 3 million plus people.

    If you run into a man who is lazy and unambitious, would that mean that all men are lazy and unambitious? It would appear that way since the premise of Dick’s arguments is stereotypes extrapolated from a very small group of women. If neither Dick nor his followers have ever met a lazy and unambitious man and thought that all men must therefore be unambitious, there is a huge double standard going on. If you can think that about women, why not about men?

    Intelligence is being able to admit that you are wrong and not think of your argument as infallible. Having an open mind and wanting to learn is what makes someone intelligent. I haven’t seen anything on this website which shows any signs of that, and therefore I haven’t seen anything intelligent or based on fact. Everything this man is saying is heresay, and I don’t even know where he got it from. Women hate sex with men? And are simultaneously addicted to it? Where does this stuff come from? Personal experience with a few women that you are trying to make representative of the entire gender? Because that’s all I see. And that is truly naive.

  16. Talon Says:

    Patti said:

    Holy crap, this is actually funny. At first I was pissed, but after reading the above I’m just sitting here snickering, feeling like I’ve just spied on the blog rant of an acne-ridden 14 year old chronic masturbator with skidmarks in his panties who’s utterly terrified of women. Clever way to find fame and fortune - by tapping into the vast ocean of male fears and insecurities.

    Dear Men: If a man has to denigrate more than half the world’s population to make himself (and his gender) look and feel better (and recruit other men/sheep to do this with him), then he’s not a man - he’s just another opportunistic fame-whore, and we already have too many of those in the world. Don’t let this fella think for you, or tell you that your daughters, sisters and mothers are nothing more than retarded human toilets. If you don’t know better than that, then you’re still just a scared little boy.

    Get of the high horse, woman.

    I do not have “fears”. I do not have “insecurities”. I do, however, have a soft spot for idiots like you who think they know everything about nothing and fulfill the requirements to be diagnosed with NPD.

    Dear moron:
    If you are going to lecture someone about their choice of beliefs, try not to be a bigot, and refrain from using shaming tactics. And please, lay off the freudian projection. While we are at it, being assumptive might not be so smart either. You are exactly the kind of idiot that drive people here; the self-proclaimed know-it-all with little respect for those you do not emphasize with, and a elitist set of predjudices to adher to.

    If you had come here three months earlier, I would still have the idea that you might actually not be so stupid once one gets to know you. Unfortunately, too many idiots made me refrain from trying to peacefully debate with people who obviously had no respect for anything exept themselves. One learns, you see.

    So please, go suck a cock.

  17. Zelrio Says:

    The days before equal rights activists were ruled by some of the smartest men alive. How come even with women supposedly being equal, you will never hear about how one led an out-numbered army to victory? Because as you have said many times, they are simply to stupid to understand how and will never be able to equal the intelligence of even the most idiotic male war general alive.

  18. Geeza Says:

    Danielle said:

    Actually, I don’t apply a ‘plethora of shit’ to my face. I put on lip gloss, I didn’t realize it was such a bad thing to have dry lips, but if you seem to think so then ok!

    You said I couldnt spell. I say you cant fucking read. I said ‘women’ apply a plethora of shit on their faces. Your personal imaginary make-up regimen does not prove me wrong.

    Ever heard of lip balm? It prevents your lips from getting dry while also preventing you from looking like a whore.

    Danielle said:

    I’d like to hear your opinion on gay men, some of them apply make-up. What does that make them?

    We’re talking generalisations here sweetcheeks. Women are make-up applying attention whores across the board.

    You’re talking ’some’ gay men who apply make-up, who are a percentage of all gay men, who are a percentage of all men. What a minority of a minority does has no bearing on the argument.

    Danielle said:
    Are they Gods to you because they choose not to fuck women?

    If women like you come to this site and prove one single thing, then that is how right we are about how fucking stupid women are.

    Only an estrogen induced fuckhead could make a connection between the statement ‘Men Are Better Than Women’ and homosexuality.

    Actually it shows how insecure women are. If you are not praised and adored like fucking disney princesses, your knee jerk reaction is to assume that any male who is critical of women must be a homosexual. But then, thats female logic for you, or rather lack of it.

  19. Danielle Says:

    Geeza said:

    Danielle said:

    Actually, I don’t apply a ‘plethora of shit’ to my face. I put on lip gloss, I didn’t realize it was such a bad thing to have dry lips, but if you seem to think so then ok!

    You said I couldnt spell. I say you cant fucking read. I said ‘women’ apply a plethora of shit on their faces. Your personal imaginary make-up regimen does not prove me wrong.

    Ever heard of lip balm? It prevents your lips from getting dry while also preventing you from looking like a whore.

    Danielle said:

    I’d like to hear your opinion on gay men, some of them apply make-up. What does that make them?

    We’re talking generalisations here sweetcheeks. Women are make-up applying attention whores across the board.

    You’re talking ’some’ gay men who apply make-up, who are a percentage of all gay men, who are a percentage of all men. What a minority of a minority does has no bearing on the argument.

    Danielle said:
    Are they Gods to you because they choose not to fuck women?

    If women like you come to this site and prove one single thing, then that is how right we are about how fucking stupid women are.

    Only an estrogen induced fuckhead could make a connection between the statement ‘Men Are Better Than Women’ and homosexuality.

    Actually it shows how insecure women are. If you are not praised and adored like fucking disney princesses, your knee jerk reaction is to assume that any male who is critical of women must be a homosexual. But then, thats female logic for you, or rather lack of it.

    HAHAHAHAAHAHHA. I’m sorry, I really am. Yes, YOU ARE SOOO AWESOME! Yeah, I secretly wish I was a disney princess. I apply a plethora of shit to my face everyday. Oh, and I really lack logic. Too bad i’m only a 16 year old and I already know that you men are probably divorced or have always been single. Holy fuck this website is hilarious. Please, for the love of God, say something back to me so I can have a good laugh.

    And, Dick, if you’re reading this, here’s a tip: try writing about something that makes sense. Like, how men would probably kill themselves if they had to have periods and get terrible cramps or gave birth! There is a reason why I, A FEMALE, think that men are better than women.

  20. Amused Says:

    Dutch269 said:

    levi said:

    I am a man, and proud of it - I like boobs just as much as the next guy - but I can honestly say that by continuing this quest, you are guilty of the narrow-mindedness that you accuse women of, and you are embarrassing me and any other true red-blooded male that knows of you. It’s funny - you call yourself the true man, when the reality is you are working harder than any of us to prove you are not a woman. Do not attempt to say that I am making things up - the preceeding statements have just as much validity as anything you have come up with on this site. My advice to you is to grow to maturity, learn a few things about real life, and then you might have something worthy to put on this website.

    Wow, you have just proven everything Dick has said…geezz you women just don’t know when to shut the fuk up. This is a business venture, and he won, and you just can’t seem to understand that.

    It’s over bitch, the free ride is over. You made your bed, get used to it. Now you females have NO CHOICE but to support yourselves, were going back to having fun and living our lives, not chained to some foul-mouthed, diamond hoarding, lazy princess.

    For every princess bitch like you, there are a dozen women who will fuck me just to take a ride in my boat. My house, my toys, my brand new truck, will never be at the mercy of a spitefull, immature gold digger such as yourself.

    Thanks for stopping by, glad we could offend you.

    Are you are calling this man a woman to insult him, or didn’t you even bother reading before you started bitching?

Pages: « 13 4 5 [6] 7 8 912 » Show All

Leave a Reply