Comments on: Women Invented Taxes: Part 1

By: i second that

i second that — Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:19:32 +0000

i also hate women -& for GOOD REASON!

By: begging the question...

begging the question... — Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:03:23 +0000

do bitches have ANYTHING else to offer besides SEX? -if so (but you don’t) do men WANT anything else? insisting that men should want to be your slaves is just more nonsense woman-logic (vibrator-fantasy) women rely on the “sisterhood” (the policy-making herd) which hands them down their “choices” for free (being born without a dick). From there; you basically have a lay-out of options to chose from (there’s no fucking MERIT in anything a particular woman does; “achievement” by sexual innuendo on sex-starved masses of men isn’t any kind of rocket science. Don’t pretend women are smarter -they’re just COMPLETELY privileged by “society”) As opposed to MEN; whom, with all odds against; still manage to stand out & outperform you, fucking snakes

trying to shape men according to your own fickle whims will only set you up for disappointment. Nothing would’ve happen to your poor mommy if she wasn’t a (probably an undercover) whore. Your yapping is HYPOCRITICAL in a way only a douchebag is capable of.

By: game over, try harder

game over, try harder — Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:19:57 +0000

“…as the weaker sex, [rape-things] are driven to rely not on force but on cunning [namely prostitution]: hence their instinctive subtlety [make-up, for instance] and their ineradicable tendency to tell lies [feministing, -to self, etc...]: for, as nature has equipped the lion with claws and teeth, the elephant with tusks, the wild boar with fangs, the bull with horns and the cuttlefish with ink, so it has equipped woman with the power of dissimulation as her means of attack and defence, and has transformed into this gift all the strength it has bestowed on man in the form of physical strength and the power of reasoning. Dissimulation is thus inborn in her and consequently to be found in the stupid woman almost as often as in the clever one. To make use of it at every opportunity is as natural to her as it is for an animal to employ its means of defence whenever it is attacked, and when she does so she feels that to some extent she is only exercising her rights. A completely truthful woman who does not practice dissimulation is perhaps an impossibility, which is why women see through the dissimulation of others so easily it is inadvisable to attempt it with them. – But this fundamental defect which I have said they possess, together with all that is associated with it, gives rise to falsity, unfaithfulness, treachery, ingratitude, etc. Women are guilty of perjury far more often than men. It is questionable whether they ought to be allowed to take an oath at all [read: being taken seriously by any sentient being] -A. Schopenhauer
So; choke on it, you whiny misfit

By: @entitled troll

@entitled troll — Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:06:01 +0000

why do you keep pretending that men want to prove something to sluts like yourself? being a pain in the ass isn’t going to get you any dick, this is not your preferred sabotage-plotting support-group, little whore

By: A.K.A. ...

A.K.A. ... — Mon, 29 Dec 2008 13:56:42 +0000

“SCUMBAGS”!

By: "he"'s pussywhipped!

"he"'s pussywhipped! — Mon, 29 Dec 2008 13:41:46 +0000

typical pimp (skanks’-unsuspecting puppet) fanboi

By: Ralohcs Denrael

Ralohcs Denrael — Sun, 05 Aug 2007 21:30:54 +0000

Dick, you have hit the nail on the head.

By: Mansman

Mansman — Sun, 05 Aug 2007 01:38:14 +0000

sue (19) said:
jst looked it up taxes were invented by thomas wolsey, who was a man, not!! a woman. ur ‘great man site’ is startin 2 luk like a load of shit now isnt it?

Classic female “logic”…she thinks she’s stumbled onto a piece of information so earth shatteringly profound it invalidates ALL other anecdotal and factual evidence contained on MABTW. Obviously it doesn’t. The stupefaction of female thinking is certainly an amazing thing to behold. It makes me appreciate all the more that I don’t have that liability draining my capacity for achieveMENt.

It’s like a stupid whore who blames her constant car accidents on Henry Ford because she’s too incompetent to actually get good at operating the

By: son of the suns

son of the suns — Tue, 01 May 2007 20:24:16 +0000

I meant hate speech or the anti-eslutishment that’s banned in Europe and parts of Asia.

By: Necroswordsman

Necroswordsman — Tue, 01 May 2007 14:29:24 +0000

Billy said: It just may be illegal where she is from judging by her incoherent post. Maybe they have to type in code?

It's womanese again.

By: Billy

Billy — Tue, 01 May 2007 12:59:07 +0000

son of the suns said: Speech isn't illegal in the country of this site's author/provider, genius.

It just may be illegal where she is from judging by her incoherent post. Maybe they have to type in code?

By: son of the suns

son of the suns — Tue, 01 May 2007 12:17:54 +0000

Speech isn’t illegal in the country of this site’s author/provider, genius.

By: karOlL

karOlL — Tue, 01 May 2007 09:44:54 +0000

zomgggggg . isnt this illegal ? OMFGGGG . guys = academically unstable ==” bah if i was really in the mood . i would be guin off by noww ==”

By: Billy

Billy — Tue, 01 May 2007 03:11:09 +0000

After reading his old post I must say I misread something here.
I thought he was somebody else. :)

By: Necroswordsman

Necroswordsman — Tue, 01 May 2007 00:29:08 +0000

sonyad said: He's a man, for crying out loud...

Im very judgemental of people.

By: sonyad

sonyad — Mon, 30 Apr 2007 22:05:44 +0000

He’s a man, for crying out loud…

- Pascal – Anti

By: Necroswordsman

Necroswordsman — Mon, 30 Apr 2007 09:35:27 +0000

Somebody Else said: And Necro, I've had a lot of respect for your posts, but I've been posting long enough that it should be very clear that I am male to the core. Always have been, always will be. Shouldn't have to create a user name that is obviously a male name or has the word "man" in it for other men to identify me as such. Too many females try that trick to know it isn't always an accurate indentifier.

Alright then, fair enough. What was your point again?

By: Somebody Else

Somebody Else — Mon, 30 Apr 2007 00:49:07 +0000

Billy, maybe that’s your problem with relationships – can’t tell males from females. You’re not that guy from Montana that was in the news a while back-was married three years before he discovered his “wife” was another man. Might want to work on that gender indentity problem.

And Necro, I’ve had a lot of respect for your posts, but I’ve been posting long enough that it should be very clear that I am male to the core. Always have been, always will be.

Shouldn’t have to create a user name that is obviously a male name or has the word “man” in it for other men to identify me as such. Too many females try that trick to know it isn’t always an accurate indentifier.

By: Billy

Billy — Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:18:08 +0000

And like they say “dont let the door hit ya where the good lord split ya”
He split you right between the ears so your the two parts of your brains wouldn’t connect. That way you would be more suited to staying at home rearing the young. But no, you females can’t even do that simple task correctly.

By: Necroswordsman

Necroswordsman — Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:34:01 +0000

Somebody Else said: Why the attack Necro?

Wild guess, but maybe because you aren't supposed to be here? As Billy says, the sign says 'No women allowed'. Now if you can truthfully tell me you are a man, then I'll apologise.