Oh yeah!!! NO DOUBT about it.

FACT: It doesn’t matter what you “EARN”… what MATTERS –>> is what’s jingling in your pocket at the end of the year.

Women don’t get this.

That’s why women never want to know what you SAVE…. they always want to know what you EARN and are willing to SPEND.

There are men out there who make 3X what I do, and have NOTHING left to put in their 401Ks at the end of the year…. while I save more money annually than 98% of Americans.

And they all have their wives to thank for it.

Poor guys. :(

Here is a tip for all the men out there.

NEVER take a woman “out for dinner” until she has done something SPECIAL – for YOU.

Buy YOURSELF a nice pair of shoes instead.

NEVER spend more than $40 on a date. One drink MAYBE two (if you’re having fun with her) and that’s it.

She has already made up her mind to fuck you by the time she put her lips down to the glass…. you don’t need to do ANY more than that. A woman who expects you to jumps through hoops beyond that is NEVER going to be worth your time…. neither is her vagina.

BUY YOURSELF A FANCY WATCH YOU ALWAYS WANTED, INSTEAD.

Or a nice car.

I live alone and have two cars.
One Exotic.

I don’t need to buy women ANYTHING. They are creaming for a ride everywhere I go.

The amount of money the average man will spend on women, taking them out, buying drinks, paying cover charge, movie, dinner, valet, gas, parking, popcorn = what a fucking NIGHTMARE.

That guy can spend it ALL on himself and he will have problems getting RID of women for LIFE.

The only problem????????
Women don’t LIKE it.

So fucking what.

Think yourself lucky you got wise to them prior to being snared Chris. Keep control of your emotions and avoid the baby trap, you’ll have it made.

Any guy makes the first mistake by assuming that women are even capable of love.
They’re not. They are only capable of instinctive reactive mechanical behaviour that they think is ‘love’. Get the fuck out of here.

Love is a male trait.

Bob: I have to say with what I’ve seen so far, I’d agree 100%. If they love anything it’s themselves.

Chris likes incest and pedophilia? WTF?
That. is sick.

omg: Idiot!! Chris is talking about his sister, hes answering HW

women’s empathy ^

Well of course it requires ‘pain’ and ’shit’ to have a baby. You are having a fucking baby, not a stroll in the park. Stop whining – having babies is not a burden as many of you women seem to think. It is your job. Do it well.

On a serious note though, if you are pregnant, and are offended by anything on this site, then I very strongly suggest that you do not visit this site.

Best of luck with having your baby.

Jesus you two read the above post. My point was that I have never met a woman who would say they remember the pain of childbirth, but we all remember the pregnancy. It is hard to give birth and be pregnant that is no shocker. I am not calling it a burden. It is difficult, but I would not trade it for the world. Also, it is not our job it is something we choose to do. It is a choice to have sex and get pregnant. It is a choice. I choose to have sex with my husband and get pregnant.

It is also funny that you tell me to stop complaining when you frequent a website that does nothing but complain and what the hell would you know about pain anyway?

No, this website does not offend me in the least. I think you people are rather funny.

Also, it is not our job it is something we choose to do. It is a choice to have sex and get pregnant. It is a choice. I choose to have sex with my husband and get pregnant.

Really? It’s a ‘choice’? I suppose that the men who work in coal mines have a choice. I also suppose that the men who die in war have a choice. And the men who toil their sweat dry to provide for their wife and children.

Of course, it is your ‘choice’ to have the baby in the first place, but it is your job when you choose to have the baby – more so because you choose to have it. But anyways, tell me, would you have the baby if you weren’t economically capable? So how is it a ‘choice’? Plainly speaking, it is not. There is no third alternative that you have, really.

And whining was exactly what you were doing. If you want to raise our sympathies for your pregnancy, you have come to the wrong place. Go to a psychiatrist. And it is none of your business to tell us whether we are complaining, because you aren’t welcome here in the first place, and furthermore you aren’t giving us any kind of reasonable argument.

You are just all ate up with dumb ass and there is no point in me furthering this conversation beyond this short reply.

I think that we(the men here) are considerably smarter than you.

This is pretty damn funny…this woman is making a clear, obvious and irrefutable point that obviously kicks RB’s ass (and I’m not just saying that because I’m a woman, plenty of men agree with me) but RB is too much of a stubborn MAN to admit when he’s wrong. She is obviously not whining, and she is right that this is a website FULL of complaining and whining about women/bitches (bitches you wouldn’t have to deal with if you didn’t ATTRACT bitches into your life).

Ha. Men are stupid. And stubborn.

Bitches are “attracted” into our lives?!?

No, the bitch has been created, by fiat, as the most entitled whimmin in the history of the world have been duped into thinking that men’s efforts to create the civilization YOU ENJOY, have been “acts of oppression,” and that any disparities which exist between men and whimmin are the result of discriminations (having babies is no great feat – it’s simply a biological function based on a lifestyle choice; YOU would not have the modern conveniences you have if it wasn’t for the sacrifices of time, money, reputation, and VERY LIVES of the men who created/discovered such things for you – now those things were PAINFUL, yet those men persisted, and among others, are defined as “oppressors”).

Indeed, it never ceases to amaze me – whimmin in Western countries with all the privilege they enjoy relative to men (who had to utilize THEIR OWN efforts to get what they’ve got), SOMEHOW have the nerve to call men whiny (hey – I’ll give you something to whine about: if YOU had to compete with men ON A LEVEL PLAYING FIELD, you wouldn’t just be whining, you’d be groveling to us, as our relative superiority would once again BE VERY APPARENT).

23 Indicators of Systemic Discrimination Against Men
(in The United States)

* The American woman by the 1960s lived in the nation with the world’s highest standard of living and owned 65% of the wealth in that nation.

* Feminists “felt victimized”, however, and convinced American women that they are “discriminated against”.

* Never have they been required to nor been able to produce a shred of statistical evidence to back up that claim.

* key statistical indicators each illustrate how men have been and are being systematically discriminated against by government fiat.

1. Wealth: Women hold 65% of the country’s wealth [Fortune Magazine]

2. Child Custody: Women receive custody of 92% of the children of divorce and illegitimacy, and men only 4%. [Department of Health & Human Services]

3. Income: Men constitute 60% of workplace hours, work longer hours, work harder, and are more qualified, rarely file sexual discrimination or harassment lawsuits or take pregnancy leave, yet earn only 42% more than women [Dept. Labor]

4. Suicide: Men’s suicide rate is 4.6 times higher than women’s [Dept. Health & Human Services -- 26,710 males vs 5,700 females]

5. Life Expectancy: Men’s life expectancy is seven (7) years shorter than women’s [National Center for Health Statistics -- males 72.3 yrs vs females 79 yrs] yet receive only 35% of government expenditures for health care and medical costs.

6. Affirmative Action: Men are discriminated against BY DESIGN through affirmative action.

7. Federal Taxes: Even though men pay 115% of federal income taxes women constitute 11% more of the voters.

8. Vote: Because there are 11% more female than male voters, males have little to no influence on how the male tax dollar is spent.

9. War: Men, not women, fight and die in battle [Dept. Defense -- Vietnam Casualties 47,369 men vs 74 women] while women sue the taxpayer when they have their butt pinched.

10. Workplace Fatalities: Men account for more than 95% of workplace fatalities.

11. Murder: Men are murdered at a rate almost 5 times that of women [Dept. Health & Human Services -- 26,710 men vs 5,700 women]

12. Jury Bias: Women are acquitted of spousal murder at a rate 9 times that of men [Bureau Justice Statistics -- 1.4% of men vs 12.9% of women]

13. Court Bias: Men are sentenced 2.8 times longer than women for spousal murder [Bureau Justice Statistics -- men at 17 years vs women at 6 years]

14. Justice System Bias: Even though the amount of the average “child support payment” due from women is half the amount due from men, and even though women are twice as likely as men to default on those payments, fathers are 97% of “child support” collections prosecutions [Census Bureau]

15. Welfare: Even though men are the recipients of less than 10% of all welfare disbursements, men are required to refund welfare payments made to women.

16. Higher Education: There are more than 200 all-female colleges for women and now not one single all-male college for men. 5.8% fewer men than women are enrolled in 4 year colleges, even though two thirds of those who score higher than 550 in SAT Math are males. In 1993 only 44.5% of college enrollment were men, and that figure has declined since then. Only 45.8% of bachelor’s degrees were conferred to men in 1992, even though 98.2% of the top fiftieth percentile of the GRE are men, and ZERO PERCENT of American high school girls correctly answered 28 out of 67 TIMSS advanced math questions. Only 38.4% of private 4 year college students were men as of 1990, and this figure has declined since then.

17. Legal System Bias: 96% of physical altercations resulting in injury to a spouse occurs AFTER the date of separation. [Read: spousal abuse laws that pretend that husbands are dangerous discriminate against husbands when we know that only a very small percent of domestic violence is associated with them]. [Chadwick and Heaton, "Statistical Handbook of the American Family"]

18. Domestic Violence: Even though study after study shows that women are the majority of the initiators of domestic violence, and 58% of the above mentioned physical altercations are initiated by the female, Congress passed the obviously anti-male VAWA and VAWA II.which are known would make the problem far worse. [Read: despite the fact we discriminate against husbands in protective orders, women still cause more than half of domestic altercations because they know they can get away with it].

19. Child Violence: Even though mothers commit 55% of child murders and biological fathers commit 6%, even though NIS-3 shows that Mother-only households are 3 times more fatal to children than Father-only households, children are systematically removed from the natural fathers who are their most effective protectors and men are imprisoned at rate 20 times that of women.

20. Family Breakdown: The US Surgeon General notes that divorce is more harmful to a man’s health than smoking tobacco, yet as much as $1.3 Trillion of federal expenditures accomplish little else than undermine family stability.

21. Women Pilots: Even though women pilots have an accident rate four times that of men pilots, federal laws require that airlines risk the safety of passengers and hire women pilots anyway.

22. Women Drivers: Even though the crash RATE of women drivers is twice that of men drivers, and even though drinking alcohol increases the crash rate of men by only 5%, the majority of those imprisoned under DUI laws are men, and women are almost never imprisoned for their much higher number of non-alcohol-related crashes.

23. Incarceration: Even though feminists brag that 1.4 million American brides commit adultery, and even though women file more than 90,000 false allegations of rape, every year, only 99,000 of the 1.8 million Americans behind bars are women.

GetSerious,LittleGirl

Excellent post,BB.

Thanks Bob – and you’re MANtastically mantertaining and intelligent posts are always appreciated by heterosexual males like myself who just want to throw a lifeline of reality to “the equals” now and then.

WhimminsDensityIsTheUltimateThreshold

I feel bad for you…I’m sorry you are on such a low level of consciousness. I hope that some day you will get past your issues about women. I don’t know what happened to you in the past, but maybe some day you will learn how to take responsibility for your life.

I think it’s rather comical that men think they are responsible for everything that is good in this world. That’s such bullshit :) Check this out some time: http://inventors.about.com/od/womeninventors/Women_Inventors.htm

But you probably won’t since you would rather stay in denial. Women don’t go around calling Martin Luther King Jr. an oppressor. Women have called men oppressors who (probably) deserved to be called such. Like men who go around pretending like men are better than women and like women have never done anything right :) Those are oppressors. Why do you spell women wrong? It’s probably an ego thing, right?

Haha it’s just so ludicrous when you imply that women never ever use their own efforts to get what they’ve got. Like every single woman goes around marrying a rich man and never working. You are so full of shit. :) Here is an example: Susan B Anthony. I think she worked pretty hard for her goal. Rosa Parks stood up for her goal, and her efforts weren’t in vein.

Evidence of discrimination against women in the 1960’s…isn’t that hard to come by. Especially in the decades leading up to that.

1. That’s probably wrong. The first, second, third, and fourth richest people in the world are men.

2. Men are lazy and don’t usually want the kids. And you men are always claiming that raising kids is “all we’re good for” so SHOULDN’T we get the custody? According to your own words?

3. “Work harder” You cannot prove something like that. That is a stupid assumption. It’s your own damn fault if you don’t file lawsuits, and of course you don’t deserve pregnancy leave. That’s dumb. And wow…you poor poor things. Only 42% MORE than us. Gosh I feel so sorry for you.

4. How is that discrimination? If you guys are stupid enough to commit suicide…that’s not my fault. Suicide is stupid.

5. Generally the difference is 3 or 4 years, not 7.

6. You may be right about this.

7. First of all how can men pay 115% of that? That doesn’t even make sense. I’m pretty sure 100% is about as much as you can pay. Also…it’s men’s fault if they don’t vote.

8. See previous answer.

9. Vietnam was a WHILE ago. There are a lot more women in war now. And news flash…men didn’t ALLOW women to be in war not too long ago.

How would you feel if a man pinched YOUR butt?

10. What are women supposed to do? Throw themselves in the way when a man is about to have a workplace fatality? Maybe there would be less of those if men weren’t so stupid.

11. Who are men mostly murdered by? Probably other men. Who are the ones who LOVE violence? Men. Men are stupid.

12. Maybe men commit spousal murder 9 times more often. They are the more violent gender, after all.

13. I don’t know what’s wrong with the courts, but I bet there are a bunch of men in them.

14. You are probably right on this one.

15. Hmm..maybe more men would be the recipients of welfare if the “baby daddies” didn’t run off and abandon all those kids with their mothers. Just saying.

16. Perhaps the reason for all the female schools is that women actually take the initiative and do things for themselves, while men like you sit around and complain about how there are not all-male schools. Maybe if men care so much, they should make some. But wait! Men think with their penises so they probably would rather be in a school with women so they can get in their pants. These huge percentages of women who are getting degrees and enrolling college is probably evident that women are better at education, not that women are worse and somehow magically getting this stuff. On a side note, I’m a woman and I made over a 550 in SAT math.

17. This one doesn’t make much sense really..you should explain it better.

18. There sure are a lot of males in Congress…it would appear that men are doing this to themselves.

19. Like I said, you the men of this website were the ones who said that raising a child is all women are good for. If this one is true than I guess women shouldn’t even exist, should we? Would you like that? A world without women? You gaywad.

20. I think being in an unhealthy relationship for a lifetime is more harmful to a man’s health.

21. Someone made up that ‘fact.’ “50% of statistics are made up.” There are plenty of women out there who do a great job of being a pilot. Do you want to make a law that outlaws women pilots? What about the female pilot out there who has been a pilot for 20 years and never had any problems? Should she be fired for being a woman?

22. Men are more aggressive drivers. They also have huge egos and think they are invincible. Men are more than twice as likely to die in a car crash than women, while women have a greater number of MINOR crashes than men. In 2006 29,722 male drivers were killed and 12,747 female drivers were killed. So who is the safer driver? Women.

23. Haha well..all I can say is I guess men are stupid enough to get caught.

“Women have called men oppressors who (probably) deserved to be called such. Like men who go around pretending like men are better than women and like women have never done anything right :) Those are oppressors.”

No bitch, THESE are oppressors.

http://www.theync.com/media.php?name=8986-extremely-graphic

THAT’S what oppression looks like. Women in the Western world have never suffered ANYTHING like that. You HAVE NEVER been oppressed in the Western world.

” Perhaps the reason for all the female schools is that women actually take the initiative and do things for themselves, while men like you sit around and complain about how there are not all-male schools.”

Or perhaps the reason (This IS the reason. Look it up.) is because women’s groups like NOW complained that all-male schools were “discriminatory”, and had them shut down.

So you’re basically saying that because men are better than women, women have been oppressed?

How can a group which is equaaaaal to another group be oppressed by that group since the dawn of civilisation? Doesn’t make any fucking sense.

And don’t say that it’s because of physical strength, because history has shown that the physically strong were almost always oppressed by the physically less strong, but more intelligent.

The most revolutionary advances of humanity have been brought about by MEN who didn’t have much in the way of muscles. Stephen Hawking can barely be considered an ‘alpha male’, can he?

“These huge percentages of women who are getting degrees and enrolling college is probably evident that women are better at education, not that women are worse and somehow magically getting this stuff.”

Or evidence of female enrollment quotas, massive restructuring of scholastic disciplines to be more female-friendly (at the cost of scientific integrity) and “positive” discrimination against males.

“Men are more aggressive drivers. They also have huge egos and think they are invincible. Men are more than twice as likely to die in a car crash than women, while women have a greater number of MINOR crashes than men. In 2006 29,722 male drivers were killed and 12,747 female drivers were killed. So who is the safer driver? Women.”

Men drive twice as many miles as women.

“Haha well..all I can say is I guess men are stupid enough to get caught.”

Haha…well all I can say is I guess that women are stupid enough to believe that in our society, the rules don’t apply to them.

Unbelievable crassness, Mo (and yes, my “you’re” should be a “your,” to Bob).

I’ll bet if those stats were from a Whimmins Studies textbook, or Whimmin United for Continual Ignorance Regarding Anything That Doesn’t Set Them On a Pedestal, you’d be in full agreement with them.

Or more apropos yet, if these GOVERNMENT statistics were “in your favor,” you’d be all over this site with them.

Up until a few months ago, when you googled “Women Invented,” the results returned to you were “Did you mean ‘Men Invented?’”
So you go and make your list of “Whimmin Inventors” (good luck finding much that wasn’t simply an “improvement” on things men invented), and then compare the short-bus list TO THE MEN’S LIST! (even with all the special treatment/encouragement the little ladies receive to go into the “hard sciences,” MEN out-invent and innovate you by a HUGE margin, STILL – and you want to talk about poppin’ out kids as a societal or personal accomplishment of some sort…ohhh, what martyrs).

WHERE’S your evidence for discrimination, Mo – do you mean because men didn’t want to hire whimmin into companies MEN created?!?

Whimmin do diddly in wars, save for ending up having to be rescued – VERY FEW are in direct combat roles (but with attitudes like yours, I’ve become all for it; only in SEPARATE UNITS, however).

You can have more than 100% of something, when that which is collected/recorded is more than your target (men get nailed for more of their money than the IRS baseline, which goes to the baby-poppin’ martyrs, among others).

The same attitudes in men – risk taking ones – are the ones which get them into more collisions (men have higher insurance rates BECAUSE rates are determined over a SPECIFIC time period. We’re quantifiably BETTER drivers than you, BECAUSE we have fewer collisions per mile driven).

I simply can’t neglect to reflect on your “amazing” powers of reason, regarding number 1 on the list (I mean, do you have ANY idea about how the ACCUMULATED wealth of millions of individuals dwarfs that of a few rich men – and again, wealth whimmin obtained by guys dying, etc).

And number 2 – why shouldn’t you get custody???
The point is, why do you, REFLEXIVELY, even when the man WANTS the children?!?

Regarding the suicide statistic – that’s just the type of response I’d expect from the whimmin. Only if the genders were reversed, you’d all have your panties in a bunch, because “Something has to be done about this tragedy!!!” (in lieu of this, apparently, whimmin go on to get at least three times the funding for problems like breast cancer, than men do for prostate, as only one example of your special treatment, you ignoramus).

Regarding number 10 – again, just the type of response I’d expect, and one of the many reasons the word C.U.N.T is used so often on this Website – do you have ANY idea about how these types of jobs are what keep your modern, convenient society going??? Obviously not; and NO appreciation.

What’s wrong with the courts is that a few saps have bowed down to the bitchy, whiny demands of the “me too” crowd (whimmin see a disparity in anything, first thing they assume is “discrimination”).

Related to this, the all-male schools, country clubs, etc. GOT SHUT DOWN by the vagina crowd – while they get to keep theirs (are you still this stupid?).

Number 15 – WHOSE CHOICE is it to have those children??? The entitled vaginas, once again. Two played the game, with a ruleset FOR ONLY ONE.

No – females SHOULDN’T be required as hirees in ANYTHING – the problem is these goofy laws, catering to the whimmin, make it so (but I never see you “ladies” screeching when things are illogical/unfair to men).
So the point is, a business/industry shouldn’t be REQUIRED to hire anybody.

So, “men are stupid,” you claim.
Well then – let me offer-up a quote from one (and the only, by dissection) feminist who was realistic enough about her world to observe the “stupidity” of men:

“If it wasn’t for men, women would be living in caves and using moss for pillows” – Camille Paglia, “Sexual Personae”

Oh,Right-WhimminWouldHaveInventedAnythingButTrouble

“Thanks Bob – and you’re MANtastically mantertaining and intelligent posts are always appreciated by heterosexual males like myself who just want to throw a lifeline of reality to “the equals” now and then.”

Just doing my part,man.

I see you all scrambling futilely for your crashing and burning arguments. It’s quite entertaining really. That list of inventors…said nothing about men on it. I guess you’re that vein and only see “MAN MAN MAN” everywhere, even where there is no sign of that. (It’s also kind of difficult to be in the leading fields of science and invention when you aren’t allowed to even get an education. For the majority of the history of mankind, women have not been allowed to get an education. Dispute me about this and you know nothing about history.) And if men are the ones (such as in the courts) discriminating against men, then I don’t know what you want us to do about it.

*I* never said that “men have oppressed women since the dawn of time.” Yet you are throwing that in my face as though I had, just like your throwing a lot of the ‘feminist’ arguments in my face as though I said them, like saying that if some female organization put out some stats that I’d “be all over them.” Yeah…I’m not a feminist, and I do my own research. The difference between feminists and myself is that feminists believe all men are bad and out to get women; I don’t believe that. I am, however, aware that women are very intelligent, worthy members of society and that this website is a joke in the eyes of truth.

“And don’t say that it’s because of physical strength, because history has shown that the physically strong were almost always oppressed by the physically less strong, but more intelligent.”

This is pretty funny because you are either saying that men oppress men, or women oppress men. If men oppress men, that just helps my argument about how stupid they are, to oppress themselves. If women oppress men (we are very intelligent after all), you are wusses. Either way the statement you just made didn’t really help your argument and you are bitching about how “oppressed” you are, the very thing that you say women are guilty of.

I feel sorry for you guys. You are living in a lie, and the only way for you to climb out of it is to do it yourself, no one else can show you the way. I hope you all find peace and love.

Namaste

“That list of inventors…said nothing about men on it. I guess you’re that vein and only see “MAN MAN MAN” everywhere, even where there is no sign of that.”

You obviously have no idea how patents work.

“It’s also kind of difficult to be in the leading fields of science and invention when you aren’t allowed to even get an education. For the majority of the history of mankind, women have not been allowed to get an education. Dispute me about this and you know nothing about history.)”

‘*I* never said that “men have oppressed women since the dawn of time.”’

This is pretty funny because you are either saying that women oppress women,or men oppress women.

If women oppress women,that just helps my argument about how stupid they are,to oppress themselves, If men oppress women (we are very intelligent after all), you are wusses.

Either way the statement you just made didn’t really help your argument and you are bitching about how “oppressed” you are, the very thing that you say men are guilty of.

Also, black male slaves fresh off the plantation managed to make revolutionary scientific contributions in the first 200 years after they came to North America, women have had THOUSANDS of years to do something in Science or Mathematics and still haven’t done shit.

Marie Curie created the theory of radioactivity. Which might someday save your life.

The exception that proves the rule.

Do you even know what that phrase means? How does it prove the rule?

Al you can come up with is Marie Curie. That’s all anyone can EVER come up with. I’m not saying ALL women are incapable of scientific achievement, but it is an EXCEPTIONAL woman who makes ANY contribution in science that comes even close to what men have been doing for thousands of years.

*All.

I think it would simply take an exception human being coupled with opportunity to do something great.

So while I know you think that men are better than women in general, do you concede that some women are better than some men? Just wondering. This site is a fascinating anthropological study :)

exceptional*

“I think it would simply take an exception human being coupled with opportunity to do something great.”

Men are 10 times more likely to qualify as “exceptional”, because men are more likely to have an IQ of over 140. That and the fact that men already have a 5 IQ point advantage over most women.

“So while I know you think that men are better than women in general, do you concede that some women are better than some men?”

A handful of women are better than some men, yes.

Let me rephrase that…I didn’t say ANY one was oppressing anyone. So your whole “reversing” my statement is null.

And what have you contributed to the field of science and invention, Bob? Women “haven’t done shit” is obviously a lie and you’re obviously a hypocrite.

Women haven’t done shit.

A greek man invented an early steam engine before most people knew the earth was round.

What have women invented in the last 100 years since the feminists came on the scene? Windshield wipers.

“Let me rephrase that…I didn’t say ANY one was oppressing anyone.”

Then the obvious lack of female contributions can only be attributed to women’s inferiority to men. So you agree that men are better than women.

You can go ahead and fuck off now, since no one invited you here in the first place.

“A handful of women are better than some men, yes.”

That’s good to hear. Because, listen. While it is true that there are more genius men than genius women, and studies have found that men have slightly higher average IQs than women, that doesn’t really matter to me, and here’s why.

My IQ is 136. Higher than the average man’s and the average woman’s. I attend a top university and I have a bright future ahead of me. By your logic, you should probably be in my kitchen making me a sandwich :)

But I don’t follow that logic. As the great Bokonon said, If you wish to study a granfalloon, just remove the skin of a toy balloon.

(if you don’t know what I’m talking about you have to read Cat’s Cradle)

“By your logic, you should probably be in my kitchen making me a sandwich :)”

You have no idea what my IQ is. Besides, I never said IQ had anything to do with it. Women are designed to make babies, and to do less strenuous work, by nature. It’s their biology. If you don’t like it,fine,but there’s nothing you can do about it.

It is only an insane person who would seriously postulate that women are,on average, capable of doing what men can do.

Also, if I wasn’t so sure you were a lesbian, I’d say you were coming on to me.

“Besides, I never said IQ had anything to do with it.”

Well, you did actually cite IQ as evidence of superiority.

My sexual organs are evidence of my purpose in life? That’s like saying having an appendix requires one to eat rocks. What about my brain? I’ll bet you $100 I’m smarter than you. Admit it, come on ;)

Oh, psh, I’m not a lesbian! I have a boyfriend and we’re very much in love.

I’m just trying to charm you into being a little more friendly.

Who cares if you’re smarter??? Steven Hawking is smarter than YOU , but that doesn’t mean he gets to enjoy a blowjob every weekend.

Guys don’t laid based on brains…….
and women FUCKIN HATE smart men.

Could you imagine what shows like “Everybody loves Raymond”, the “Simpsons” and “Kind of Queens” would be like if the husbands were portrayed with an actual IQ.

THOSE FUCKIN’ WIVES WOULD BE PISSSSSSSSSSED and wouldn’t stand a CHANCE with the shit they try and pull.

So as you can see, cunt…. your 136 IQ is useless here.
And …. it’s never gonna get you get you laid.

Menarebetterthanwomen.

••• “Oh, psh, I’m not a lesbian! I have a boyfriend and we’re very much in love.”•••

A “BOY”-FRIEND???

Yeah ok sugartits , you run along and have with your BOY-friend. Be sure to let us know when you’re ready for a MAN.

I hope you and your doormat will be very happy together.

Menarebetterthanwomen.

“Well, you did actually cite IQ as evidence of superiority. ”

Yes, but my other comment, “Besides, I never said IQ had anything to do with it.”, was referring to making sandwiches.

“My sexual organs are evidence of my purpose in life? That’s like saying having an appendix requires one to eat rocks. ”

No, a more accurate analogy would be “Having canine teeth makes it more likely that an organism is a meat-eater.”.

Yes, the organs and biological features one is equipped with make an organism predisposed to a certain lifestyle. You are delusional if you think otherwise.

If you don’t believe me, try feeding a lion some hay sometime and see what happens. He won’t eat the hay, but he’ll gladly take your hand.

“I’m just trying to charm you into being a little more friendly.”

I’m immune to such trite manipulations. But you do prove, interestingly enough, that a woman who is possessed of high mental capabilities (as you claim to be) will still try to use her sex appeal as a means of bargaining and manipulating. You’ve summed up my argument better than I could have through your actions, I’ll give you that.

Oh honey, calm down. I’m trying to have a mature debate here. Now, in today’s modern society, intelligence does win.

And it’s gotten me laid several times, in fact! And oh god, I love intelligent guys. I’d so do Steven Hawking haha.

Now, don’t panic and start citing bad sitcoms because I’ve outwitted you. I’m done with you here. I’m going to find another male on this site who can actually hold his own in a debate.

See you in my kitchen in 10 years! Remember, go light on the mayo.

Wait, wait, I have to respond to this.

“a woman who is possessed of high mental capabilities (as you claim to be) will still try to use her sex appeal as a means of bargaining and manipulating.”

What sex appeal? You found anything I said sexy? What did I say?

I was just being polite. You know, the opposite of rude. Men and women alike use this technique to quell rude comments.

Please do fuck off the site entirely. We really don’t want you here, and if you were as mature as you say you are, you would recognize that and respect our wishes.

We don’t go to women’s websites and start debating with them about which are the most absorbent tampons, as our input on the matter is clearly insufficient (having had no experience other than buying the damn things for our girlfriends), and unwelcome.

Extend us the same courtesy,won’t you?

You were the one who said you were trying to charm me, I just assumed it wasn’t with your wit and humor, since you displayed none.

Ugh. Ok. Your ignorance makes it impossible to not correct you.

You can’t compare sexual organs to teeth. While meat eating is essential to the survival of a lion, bearing children is not essential to the survival or an individual female.

I thought my appendix analogy was pretty clever :)

Aw you didn’t find the mental image of a hot college girl doing Steven Hawking funny? Oh well, I got a kick out of it.

No, bearing children is essential to the survival of the human species. Just like men sacrificing their lives fighting off predators is essential to the survival of the species.

That’s the problem with you women, you’re always thinking of yourselves. Everything has to revolve around you.

Haha you’re god damn right!

Hold on, you sacrificed yourself fighting off a predator?! Oh my god, what was it like? Are you OK? Wow, what a selfless man. *makes you a sandwich*

I’m sure some dumbass woman in Southern Appalachia will more than make up for my lack of children.

“This is pretty funny because you are either saying that men oppress men, or women oppress men. If men oppress men, that just helps my argument about how stupid they are, to oppress themselves. If women oppress men (we are very intelligent after all), you are wusses. Either way the statement you just made didn’t really help your argument and you are bitching about how “oppressed” you are, the very thing that you say women are guilty of.”

- Oh dear Lord…..I was MOCKING your one-dimensional, myopic view of the world. You CAN’T see anything without your green ‘oppression’ goggles, and look at anything objectively.

Men oppress men? Obviously….women have babies, not men. Men would obviously want to protect their offspring and the mothers of those offspring from other men!

Men are BETTER than women. Why would they want to compete with someone inferior to them. Men KNOW that we’d ‘win’ against women in any kind of competitive scenario. That’s why you see the legal and social system in the west, and indeed anywhere on earth, ticked in favour of women.

As Napoleon said – ‘Women are machines for making babies.’

I don’t want the machine to get hurt, because that could also endanger the child – who are the next generation.

And you want an IQ test? See how much you score here:

http://www.iqtest.dk/main.swf

I scored 145+(the highest score possible in that test). That means my IQ is somewhere around 160. So, get in my kitchen and make me a sammich NOW!

“Hold on, you sacrificed yourself fighting off a predator?!”

Back in my younger, headier days, I cut many a “predator” with broken beer bottles when they started harassing my woman, so yes. I’ve still got scars from those fights.

Wow that’s really impressive. 145+?

Sure, I’ll make you a sandwich. But hold on, I want to hear from Bob what fighting off predators was like.

Oh, and Marie Curie did not create the theory of radioactivity. She DISCOVERED radioactivity, you silly bitch. And that too, IN ASSOCIATION WITH her fucking husband, and another guy, Becquerel. Interestingly, all her scientific activity ceased after the death of her husband. And she won just 1/5th of the Nobel Prize. Look it up on the Nobel’s site.

Aw that’s kind of sweet Bob.

“But hold on, I want to hear from Bob what fighting off predators was like.”

I already told you to fuck off. If you can’t acknowledge my request, I refuse to acknowledge yours.

“Marie Curie did not create the theory of radioactivity. She DISCOVERED radioactivity”

Oh, same fucking thing. Stop crowded the posts.

crowding*

RB, I think you’re confusing me with some other person here. I didn’t say anything about oppression, what’s-her-name did. Samantha mo. Just clearing that up.

“Oh, same fucking thing. Stop crowded the posts.”

No, bitch. The THEORY of radioactivity, which enumerated its nature and characteristics, was discovered by Henri Becquerel.

“RB, I think you’re confusing me with some other person here. I didn’t say anything about oppression, what’s-her-name did. Samantha mo. Just clearing that up.”

Who cares? Women are collectivists by nature anyways.

Oh stop with the jabs. How do you respond to my appendix analogy RB? I’m still very proud of it.

You’re so fucking dumb. I’m pretty sure that a woman with an IQ of 136 took an IQ test where there were very few logical/spatial reasoning questions. Where did you score the most, the general knowledge section?

Either way, you are pissing me and the other men here, off. So leave.

“How do you respond to my appendix analogy RB? I’m still very proud of it.”

He doesn’t need to respond to it,it’s wrong.

It would be like a man saying “Dammit, I know I have a penis and produce sperm, but I wasn’t made to fertilize a woman’s eggs! I can do anything I want with this sperm, in fact, I think I’m going to use it as Krazy glue instead!”

Go ahead and believe it if you want, but it sounds pretty retarded to the rest of us.

I’m simply asking a question. Just because someone has an organ (unnecessary for individual survival, such as the uterus or appendix), does he/she have to use it?

Well you could use it for Krazy glue! Is every man obligated to fatherhood?

Only if you want a genetically diverse population of people capable of continued evolution and adaptation.

That’s a good point. But I wouldn’t say that the human race is on the brink of extinction.

Personally, I would like to adopt rather than have my own child. Is there anything wrong with that?

This porthladd cunt is fucking stupid.

Sigh you guys can keep saying that but your opinion of me is not affecting my opinion of myself. So save it, please?

What kind of a dumb cunt sticks around and begins sentences with “personally, I think…… ” after she was told to fuck right off.

“That’s a good point. But I wouldn’t say that the human race is on the brink of extinction.”

You never know.

No, there’s nothing wrong with it, as long as the child has a father as well.

So, what you’re saying is that not being a baby making machine is perfectly fine? Aren’t you contradicting yourself?

No, I’m saying that there’s nothing abnormal about adopting other people’s children as well.

It’s a fairly common practice.

Also, whether you use your uterus for giving birth or not is irrelevant, that’s what it’s there for. It’s certainly not a tea-cozy.

“As Napoleon said – ‘Women are machines for making babies.’

I don’t want the machine to get hurt, because that could also endanger the child – who are the next generation.”

How does adoption not make me a useless example of my gender, according to your logic? I’m not procreating. I’m not ensuring the survival of my genes. I don’t even need to get fucked by a man (hypothetically, let’s remember)!”

Women are completely sexual. All their lives revolve around sex.

Men are partially sexual – so we can do shit the rest of the time. Why do you think women accuse men of being obsessed with sex? Because the only interaction between men and women is sexual.

Sorry love, time for bed.

Nice talking to you!

*Sigh*

If you’re not going to read my responses to you, I guess I can just quit responding.

It would be extremely courteous and set a good example for other women if you’d just go ahead and fuck off, like several of the men here have told you to do already.

Oh, p.s., after talking to you, I don’t believe for a second that you have the IQ of a genius. You’re kind of smart, sure, but maybe try another test. Good night!

Sorry Bob! I read your comment, I promise. My response was both to you and RB. Ok I have to go, I have class tomorrow.

I don’t care what you believe. I don’t need anyone’s approval of my assessment of biological facts. The facts stand on their own merits.

“Ok I have to go, I have class tomorrow.”

And she finally fucks off, pretending it was her idea, as per the typical female method of operation.

*Sigh*

Note the usual feminist trickery, here – taking white, middle class women as immutable representatives of their gender.

Well lets hope that stupid bitch goes to “class” and actually LEARNS something.

“Well lets hope that stupid bitch goes to “class” and actually LEARNS something.”

Fucking universities are nothing but breeding grounds for uppity,worthless, feminist cunts who think they are omniscient these days.

We should have burned our institutes of higher learning to the ground before letting women into them. I read an article the other day about how feminists are trying to restructure engineering and science to do away with all the “male-centered learning”. They specifically cited logic,reason, and the scientific method as the “male-centered learning” that has to go. I guess they’d replace all that with “feeeeeeeeeelings-based” science.

I can see it now: “I feeeeeeeeeeeel that the value of pi is 123456789, and that what goes up doesn’t necessarily HAVE TO come down, because it can be borne aloft indefinitely by the hopes and wishes of children and fluffy ickle-wickle, itty-bitty puppy dogs.”

That’s completely ridiculous. Why do you assume so many things? Hopefully by now you know what happens when one assumes… For example “who think they are omniscient”? Clearly you are the one who thinks you are omniscient. Women in general do not. Plenty of us know we’re intelligent, but ‘the biggest room in the world is the room for improvement’ is one of my favorite sayings. In no way, shape or form do I, as a woman, believe that I am omniscient. Nor am I stupid. I don’t know why you always have to jump from one extreme to the other; women either have to “think they know everything” or “know nothing.”

Neither is true and moderation is key in life (in most matters). You’d do well to learn that.

Also Bob, this

“I don’t need anyone’s approval of my assessment of biological facts. The facts stand on their own merits.”

doesn’t make sense. First you said you don’t need approval of your ASSESSMENT of biological facts. And you proceeded to say that the FACTS stand on their own. That’s inconsistent; you are acting as though facts and your assessment of facts are one and the same.

Sorry Bob; just because you are a man, doesn’t mean you are omniscient.

Excellent job, benignbullet. Numbers are always welcomed and fully understood in the community of dicks. These bitches here are really annoying. To give them access to mobile phones and computers was probably the biggest mistake we have ever made. I strongly suggest to ignore them. Lets not forget – they live from any sort of attention.

There’s only one type of woman.

That just shows how ignorant you are and how little you know about the capabilities of women. First of all I wouldn’t be dumb enough to get pregnant (for reasons to lengthy to list, one of them being the millions of kids who need to be adopted). And if I did I wouldn’t “bitch” about it. And there are plenty more women who wouldn’t. And there are some who would. There are many many different types of women out there. If you are too sheltered to find them, your loss.

The first time anything went wrong, ALL women would blame the man. Just like you did with MP.

As I said, there’s only one type of woman, the greedy,self-serving, lying kind who excuses her misbehavior by blaming the nearest man.

Ok I’m not blaming her behavior on MP. I am saying that MP wouldn’t have to deal with that behavior if he hadn’t married that type of woman. (Or if he’d trained her right.)

You sir, are an ignorant, idiotic bastard and I hope you are stuck with the greedy, self-serving, lying bitches for the rest of your life. Clearly that’s the only type of woman you want to be in your life since that’s all you ever think about.

“Ok I’m not blaming her behavior on MP. I am saying that MP wouldn’t have to deal with that behavior if he hadn’t married that type of woman. (Or if he’d trained her right.)”

How the fuck is he supposed to train her right? All she has to do is allege being uncomfortable around him and he gets whisked off to jail by the friendly men in blue uniforms.

“You sir, are an ignorant, idiotic bastard and I hope you are stuck with the greedy, self-serving, lying bitches for the rest of your life.”

I love you too, sweetheart.

“Clearly that’s the only type of woman you want to be in your life since that’s all you ever think about.”

I appreciate the offer, but I’m just not looking for a relationship right now.

You just admitted that you like greedy, self-serving, lying bitches, since that’s what you would be looking for if you were looking for a relationship. So why do you keep whining about them?

You clearly know nothing about me and I’m not even going to worry about your little “burn” there.

“You just admitted that you like greedy, self-serving, lying bitches…”

No,but you just admitted that you were one.

You implied that I was one, and then implied that you’d consider me if you were looking for a relationship.

Dumbass.

“You implied that I was one, and then implied that you’d consider me if you were looking for a relationship.”

- No he didn’t. Don’t make yourself seem any more stupid than you already do.

And plenty of women say that they are not greedy, self-serving bitches and then turn out to be exactly that. Women have no guilt, no morality, no ethical standard. I’d put my head in the jaws of a tiger rather than believe what a woman says.