Nature’s Filibuster
Arguing with a woman is like walking through a Fun House of Mirrors.
Sure it’s fun for a while. You get to see yourself in new and interesting ways, something that we men love to do to grow emotionally and in character. But then it gets really fucking irritating and disorienting because almost none of it makes any kind of sense and you have to keep backtracking to make progress that you thought you made like ten minutes ago.
Where the fuck are the stairs?
Women define losing an argument as not having the last word.
It’s a completely backwards mindset because in the end nobody learns anything about anything, but that’s how they do it. Think you’re getting somewhere with a woman in a debate about politics or business? Guess again. If she didn’t begin the argument this way in the first place, she will now just start spouting random inane bullshit at you like a sprinkler. Not one of those gentle misting sprinklers either, one of those annoying ones that sound like a machine gun going off and shoots you in the eye when you’re not expecting it.
As a man, your idea of an argument is three fold:
1) Identify the issue.
2) Listen and gather research and information regarding said issue.
3) Try to reach a resolution amiably.
Women, nature’s filibuster, argue like this:
1) Waste as much time as possible.
Women value time and life like a garbage disposal values fine cuisine. It’s just something else to squander away. And really, how can they even understand the concept of time wasted when they have nothing to do with it otherwise. How many women have climbed Everest? None probably. Who cares?
Related Articles:
September 25th, 2005 at 4:44 pm - IP Man-Hash: d43a158ad3229
your killing me dick, i havent blushed this long in ages :)
September 25th, 2005 at 4:45 pm - IP Man-Hash: 3f6f1bc89c9c0
George, see my post about this here:
http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/men-are-smarter-than-women/#comme nt-2238
“sera” is either a group of 4 or 5 males who are sitting around all day, carefully crafting these posts as a lark, or she’s every article on menarebetterthanwomen personified.
September 25th, 2005 at 7:58 pm - IP Man-Hash: 9ba3bf4ea5245
Dan is either retarded or….. no, sorry, Dan is just retarded. get a sense of humour, it was a joke you nob, sometimes people give answers that are just dumb to avoid answering the question, or the fact that the person has just given a logical answer…. which is what dick has done, giving me no option but to find it very funny and reply jokingly.
September 26th, 2005 at 9:28 am - IP Man-Hash: 56806c0431943
All you seem to be doing Dan is renforcing the age old steriotype of stupidity.
September 26th, 2005 at 10:12 am - IP Man-Hash: e2bdae6dd4ca9
“All you seem to be doing Dan is renforcing the age old steriotype of stupidity.”
For the sake of every woman who is reading your posts and squirming, Nicole — I beseech you. Use the spellchecker!
September 26th, 2005 at 10:30 am - IP Man-Hash: 56806c0431943
wel i wood but i no it anoys da hell outa Dick all so i dnt rele care cos were on da intranet not in a englash test!
September 26th, 2005 at 8:28 pm - IP Man-Hash: 3f6f1bc89c9c0
Kate. Unfortunately she not only misspells words, but uses the incorrect forms of homophones, so it would hardly save us.
September 26th, 2005 at 11:44 pm - IP Man-Hash: 1c02f21d37550
Why would poor spelling annoy me?
-Dick
September 27th, 2005 at 9:07 am - IP Man-Hash: 56806c0431943
well it seems to annoy Dan, besides you’ve taken your time correcting any slight error. Or prehaps thats just because you like to be annoying.
November 4th, 2005 at 6:20 pm - IP Man-Hash: ffa713d7d43c3
An obvious statement…
You are not legally a man or woman until you reach 18yrs of age.
You are not socially a man or woman until you have matured and flown the nest, around 21 yrs of age.
Just cause your bits are in working order and you recently proved that to yourself does not make you a man or woman.
January 17th, 2006 at 10:05 am - IP Man-Hash: cbc856ab3c6ed
Mike Says:
June 8th, 2005 at 7:21 am - IP Man-Hash: f50f4d9673b5e
Women never invent anything! Well, with the exception of false accusations and statistics.
Looks like you’re the one inventing false accusations and statistics, Mike.
Check these links out:
http://inventors.about.com/library/blwomeninventors.htm
http://www.archives.lincolndailynews.com/2003/Apr/10/News_new/business .shtml
January 17th, 2006 at 11:19 am - IP Man-Hash: 0795933ac7815
Hmm. Another woman just starting fight the realisation that she belongs to a pathetic gender.
Look….look….a couple of dozen women invented something, a few more were even mathematicians, some even climbed Everest, a couple of women can even hold their own at chess, and 20 years ago a woman tennis champion beat a 50 year old male tennis player.
Dont these women realise how desperate they sound?
Welcome to the room of self dellusion currently occupied by Female, Nicole and FemaleMark2.
January 18th, 2006 at 5:06 am - IP Man-Hash: b0f9f0d0903d8
It’s just like the eighties when wommin shouted “oooohhhhh, Look at us we are perfect”.
Men thought ” yes it’s true, you are perfect “obnoxious,selfish, self-serving bitches” that is” and you haven’t ceased proving it since.
Not a day passes where we are not reminded of it.
January 18th, 2006 at 5:27 am - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
It’s worth noting that Karpov was first world champ in 1975. Her citing him being tied by a woman is (as I pointed out elsewhere) nearly akin to a woman dancing on Mohammed Ali’s grave, taunting him, and then saying she tied the world boxing champ.
Evidently not.
-wolfe
January 18th, 2006 at 11:57 am - IP Man-Hash: d17bc6a738014
A little boy and a friend of his can easily delude themselves that they can make a flying robot. Then, they bring lumps of metal together to make the ‘robot’ and ignite its ass. To their surprise, nothing happens. A little boy can easily imagine that he can fly in his carton box, but soon or later, reality will bring his feet down and hit them real hard. ‘Not that easy, boy!’ Women are as immature as little boys. And they never grow up. All their lives, they fly on their carton boxes and carefully avoid facing the reality. That’s why they can easily fall into the delusion that they need men no more than fish need bicycles. But, just imagine, what the world would be like if all men were to disappear in an instant. Women would be cheerful for a while, but soon enough, things would start to break down. Stuff would need repairing and maintenance. Women would gather in front of machines, uniting their empathetical powers in their vain attempts to fix them. Only then, would it get through their thick heads that empathy is just a feminist-invented myth and it was actually men who were carrying them in their boxes. Next, they would probably burst into tears, hugging and consoling each other. Women of the next generations would worship men if they were to reappear, until all got forgotten and a new ‘wave’ of feminism emerged with the same sick idea that patriarchal opression was accountable for all of women’s failures.
The point is not only that women couldn’t have created a civilization from scratch, but, as if that weren’t sad enough, also that they can’t even keep an existing one running. So, the best thing men could do for themselves would be to disappear for a while until women fucked up completely and fell hard on their round asses. But even if that were possible, men would prefer licking those asses, instead, in order to get laid and sell their stuff to them.
For the sake of simplicity, I left out the problem of women tearing each other apart with painted claws, but it’s no big deal since taking it into account wouldn’t help improve the case. It is so ironic that a sisterhood between ladies exists only as long as there’s a man among them. A man who none of the ladies fancies, that is. Just as soon as one of the ladies ‘falls in love’ with him, all others will suddenly and coincidentally start to find him very, very attractive and the sisterhood will shatter to pieces in the blink of an eye.
January 19th, 2006 at 1:57 pm - IP Man-Hash: 645e530646808
obvious, of cource I’m a woman. What a silly statement.
March 14th, 2006 at 11:45 am - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
Glad you enjoy the content, Fishing.
Look over on the right hand side and you’ll see a bar of menu options:
Pages… Proof…Archives… etc. Down at the bottom there’s a category headed by “Meta”. These are the feeds. There are feeds for entries (http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/feed/), comments (http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/comments/feed/), and the forums. (Cutting and pasting that one is left as an exercise for the reader).
Paste the requisite feed address into your newsreader, and presto.
-wolfe
May 16th, 2006 at 5:27 am - IP Man-Hash: eadd56da2c7c9
They can’t even go to the bathroom by themselves, Özgür. Creation and maintenance of civilizations will be the duty of men until the day you say “Hey, Big Al, I was just about to take a leak. Do you want to join me?”
I suspect that will be a cold day in hell.
-Big Al
June 6th, 2006 at 1:52 am - IP Man-Hash: ee58a00bb64be
This site is hilarious.
The girls come here breaking the rules trying to prove something and they do. They prove that men are better than women.
I bet none of these girls who come to complain ever went to one of the thousands of male bashing websites and told them they were wrong.
June 6th, 2006 at 4:44 am - IP Man-Hash: 356b2e2244d02
Because men have skill, flair and the initiative to do it first. That is the whole point.
The whole idea of climbing Everest would not occur to a women, had a man not achived it first.
Nobody gives a fuck who crosses the line in 2nd place, sorry… that’s life.
Nicole, humor us. Go grab yourself a copy of the Guiness book of records and compare the number of records held by men compared with women.