Nature’s Filibuster
Arguing with a woman is like walking through a Fun House of Mirrors.
Sure it’s fun for a while. You get to see yourself in new and interesting ways, something that we men love to do to grow emotionally and in character. But then it gets really fucking irritating and disorienting because almost none of it makes any kind of sense and you have to keep backtracking to make progress that you thought you made like ten minutes ago.
Where the fuck are the stairs?
Women define losing an argument as not having the last word.
It’s a completely backwards mindset because in the end nobody learns anything about anything, but that’s how they do it. Think you’re getting somewhere with a woman in a debate about politics or business? Guess again. If she didn’t begin the argument this way in the first place, she will now just start spouting random inane bullshit at you like a sprinkler. Not one of those gentle misting sprinklers either, one of those annoying ones that sound like a machine gun going off and shoots you in the eye when you’re not expecting it.
As a man, your idea of an argument is three fold:
1) Identify the issue.
2) Listen and gather research and information regarding said issue.
3) Try to reach a resolution amiably.
Women, nature’s filibuster, argue like this:
1) Waste as much time as possible.
Women value time and life like a garbage disposal values fine cuisine. It’s just something else to squander away. And really, how can they even understand the concept of time wasted when they have nothing to do with it otherwise. How many women have climbed Everest? None probably. Who cares?
Related Articles:
June 5th, 2005 at 3:04 pm - IP Man-Hash: 38ae76999b940
Climbing Mount Everest does not become a greater achievement for one particular gender if the other has done exactly the same thing. If women were only doing something as great as climbing Mount Everest to create an argument with men, then they wouldn’t have done it more than forty times. You seem to have made the classic “macho” man mistake of living in a deluded world where every woman revolves around you. Women do amazing things because we want to, not to create an argument with men.
The only difference between men and women climbing Everest is that if a man fails people will say he does not have what it takes, but if a woman fails people will say women do not have what it takes.
June 6th, 2005 at 7:47 am - IP Man-Hash: c225a03114c3c
Only when we stop comparing the genders will we achieve true equality.
June 6th, 2005 at 11:33 am - IP Man-Hash: 3f6f1bc89c9c0
Was this supposed to be profound? Although many women, in vain, try to “achieve” equality, it is a futile mission. Read carfully what she says here men. Wanting to stop “comparing the genders” is the talk of someone who knows they aren’t going to stack up when the comparison is made. You know that friend who never wants to keep score when you’re playing fossball? That’s because he knows he loses by 80 fucking points every time you play and doesn’t want there to be an official record of the ass wooping!
June 6th, 2005 at 11:44 am - IP Man-Hash: c225a03114c3c
Actually I heard that expression used on a website which was comparing GCSE and A-Level results of boys and girls showing that girls were outstripping the boys by far, the phrase was said by a man who thought that equality should be achieved.
June 6th, 2005 at 1:59 pm - IP Man-Hash: a0f4c7b636e9d
OK guys i see where this is going, I am actually taking my GCSEs at the moment and Nicole here is trying to draw me into this fruitless argument so that I don’t revise and do worse than all the girls. Nicole-that’s below the belt old gal. You might also want to consider that way back during the time of cavemen the men were the big strong ones who created the technologies and environment that has enabled us to build our current society and advanced world where women have excelled. Perhaps, Nicole, a bit of appreciation is more in order seen as we are the ones who have created a system in which you can excel.
June 6th, 2005 at 2:33 pm - IP Man-Hash: a0f4c7b636e9d
Of course jobs were available to women besides manual labour!! Its just that they didn’t have all these ridiculous laws about sexual discrimination; now companies need to fill quotas and avoid long, drawn out discrimination cases, so they employ more women, this is why women now appear to be ‘excelling’, whereas they are in fact just puppets, space fillers, much like the air in malteser packets.
June 6th, 2005 at 3:10 pm - IP Man-Hash: c225a03114c3c
‘The Man’ I never meant my comment to imply that men are inferior. I believe in equality and my point was to prove that although I’m sure there are many things particularly men excel in, but there are also areas that particularly women excel in.
I am also doing my GCSE’s and I don’t appreciate it when men on this website tell me that they are no measure of intelligence because I have worked hard to get where I am.
June 7th, 2005 at 4:12 am - IP Man-Hash: a0f4c7b636e9d
What still amuses me is the number of people who gasp at the cheek of this site and fail to notice the tongue wedged firmly in it…
June 7th, 2005 at 8:21 am - IP Man-Hash: e420dbb177d6e
Knowledge is being able to recite others intelligence, intelligence is understanding them and adding to them with your own views.
Perhaps some subjects in GCSE’s require only knowledge, like maths and science. But many require intelligence. English Literature is all about opinions, drama and art require creativity and even subjects like geography require a passion for mankind, the highest marks are given to those who display empathy for people in situations in the worst LEDC’s.
It’s painful to imagine that I have spent the last two years drawing, writing poetry, performing, acting, dancing, writing about my own opinions and expressing myself in every way only to be told by adults that my achievements are meaningless and only require ‘repeating’ others knowledge.
June 7th, 2005 at 9:24 am - IP Man-Hash: 023280290cfb1
this site is hilarious. its funny to read, because it’s the most rediculous shit i’ve ever read. Nicole, coutos to you, but countering these old farts only sinks you to their level. you and me both know that women and men together make the world go around. without women, no children. without women, no peace. i believe women make excellent arguements. this point it exhibitted above, because if the women who read these articles didn’t make good arguements, why would the sexist pigs who run this shit bother replying? i would like to appologize on behalf of all logically thinking men for this sight. not all guys think this way.
-jake, 16
June 7th, 2005 at 3:40 pm - IP Man-Hash: cc0d45fa29251
The Man is constantly right, all the way from his name to his comments.
June 7th, 2005 at 8:59 pm - IP Man-Hash: fec706171cae4
For the love of God will you assholes stop talking about the GCSEs. This site is supposed to be a place where men can discuss the world that men have created–not a fucking haven for pompous teenagers without a fucking clue.
June 8th, 2005 at 5:25 am - IP Man-Hash: a0f4c7b636e9d
Nicole, re: your point that women are under appreciated by men, for staying home a doing menial tasks. You are interupting an argument which everyone else here seems to be able to cope with, or do you rank GCSEs as menial tasks? Surely the starting point of this discussion was that it is pointless to argue with a women because they merely lead you round in circles? Is that not precisely what you have done as we have covered that ground and quite definitely established that men ARE better than women. But, if you insist, i feel that women bring it upon themselves, i mean seriously, how many straight men did either textiles or ‘food technology’ at GCSE?
June 8th, 2005 at 6:46 am - IP Man-Hash: a0f4c7b636e9d
Militant Lesbian, as is obvious from your appalling grammer, and tear jerkingly bad spelling. Coupled with you atrociously chosen, and in my eyes offensive screen name, you too are clearly a bored adolescent, so the fact your are prepard to waste time telling another that he is doing the same is some what hypocritical, after all ‘its better to be at leisure, than waste your time toiling at nothing’ i leave you with that thought, o deep and meaningful one.
ps. could someone please dierect those louts Caveman and The Man back towards a gender related arguement, i feel we are degenerating to the level of women.
“Dont hold an arguement with someone less intelligent than yourself, they will merely lower you to their level and beat you on experience.”
June 8th, 2005 at 7:21 am - IP Man-Hash: f50f4d9673b5e
Great blog this. Any blog that promulgates an obvious truth i.e. that men are better than women, cannot be anything but great. Anyone with a smattering of intelligence will tell you that.
All you have to do is look around you and look at history; look at the arts and the sciences - every field led by men. Columbus discovered America and he didn’t have to ask the way. A woman trying to do his job would have had the map upside down!
There’s never been a female artist of any genius, nor a composer or conductor. Women never invent anything! Well, with the exception of false accusations and statistics. Even Germaine Greer admitted that women can’t write poetry.
It’s noteworthy that, in the recent Junior Mastermind, boys swept the board for the second year running leaving the girls way behind. It’s a similar story in the adult version of course. Hardly ever does a woman get into the final round and the Mastermind at the end is nearly always a man. This competition has all the elements of a true examination (something we don’t have in schools now) where the competitors have to learn their material and are then tested on it - without any help from Mum and Dad, as in “coursework”.
And we have a massive number of female “teachers” diluting the profession to ensure that standards continue on their downward trend through the cellar floor. We desperately need more men in teaching. If necessary let’s pay them more!
June 16th, 2005 at 3:42 pm - IP Man-Hash: e420dbb177d6e
Mike, I understand your point of view. While it is true that many men are probably better than many women at certain tasks. There are just as many women who are better than men at certain tasks. You cannot generalise everyone into two big groups because of isolated incidents. That would be like saying African Americans are generally faster sprinters, so they must be better than Caucasians.
Very few women fit into this stereotype that has been built up on this website. Just like very few men fit into the typical matcho man stereotype (however much they’d like to).
You need to break away from the stereotypes that bound our society, in order to ever understand anyone. If you like you can live in your little 50’s detergent advert where men work hard all day while the women sit at home cleaning and suppress anything resembling intelligence. But most prefer the real world. Wake up.
June 16th, 2005 at 9:58 pm - IP Man-Hash: 91f580c2c8cf3
i think this is a load of crap
June 21st, 2005 at 8:15 pm - IP Man-Hash: 770ef9ea45010
What is this “men argue by doing research” shit? Dick made a statement. Nicole disproved it by doing research. But this is an instance of women spouting useless inane babble and obscuring an argument. In other words, both men and women argue in JUST the same way! Call it fertiliser or cow-pie, it’s the same shit. Just goes to prove my point, all humans are equally stupid.
June 21st, 2005 at 8:20 pm - IP Man-Hash: b9ccf0bcef0c9
>What is this “men argue by doing research� shit?
If you knew how to do research, you would be able to answer your own question.
However, the fact is that research, like so many of the higher intellectual functions, is forever out of the reach of those who suffer from Y-Chromosome Deficiency Syndrome (YCDS), that is to say, the lesser sex.
June 26th, 2005 at 12:53 pm - IP Man-Hash: c9adc407188f8
Evil Pundit, you would be so much happier if you had the ability to judge a person on character and look beyond gender.
Perhaps then you would be Good Pundit.