They Can Never Take Our Pimpdom
You know what I think is hilarious: that the only successful woman pimp ever — Heidi Fleiss — was so inept that she went to prison and nearly sullied the reputation of one of the greatest thespians of the 20th century. One Charlie “The Green Machine” Sheen.
By the way, when I say “successful”, I mean successful in the way that a woman can be successful, by sleeping her way to the top and dodging the karma tornado of ineptitude for as long as possible.
Ultimately, success for a woman is having the new high score for Most Years Without Fucking Up. I think the record is like two. Princess Di probably holds it too. I don’t really know. I don’t give a shit.
Women do not make good pimps. In fact, they don’t make pimps at all.
Pimping requires business sense, charisma, and compassion; which are all fucking stuff that no woman has. Usually not being qualified doesn’t stop them from doing anything though. Single mothers raise children every day. However, there’s no affirmative action for pimping.
Let’s look at the facts.
Pimps cannot take maternity leave.
Pimps cannot afford to dress way inappropriately for work.
Pimps cannot start crying while business is going on around them.
At the end of the day, pimping is the oldest profession in the world. It’s been around ever since the first woman saw the first man building a shelter, making dinner, and inventing vegetables and thought to herself, “I can’t do any of that shit. Guess I better learn how to fuck.”
And she never did.
Related Articles:
January 10th, 2006 at 1:33 am - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
Looks should be disjoint from respect. I think you are misreading what I wrote. I suppose you can argue I’m agreeing with you, though.
No, if anything it was a potshot at your attractiveness (and it wasn’t even that). You’re too sensitive.
Age, so you’re not 31-35. Ok. You are either then later in your 30’s or 20-something (or 40’s/50’s whatever). I assume more later 30’s, though it’s still possible late 20’s. You present intellectually as a woman in her early 30’s, for whatever that’s worth.
-wolfe
January 10th, 2006 at 1:47 am - IP Man-Hash: 05876c7260a2f
You assume wrong. This topic is no longer open for discussion, a woman does not reveal her age.
January 10th, 2006 at 6:05 am - IP Man-Hash: 784e64d647015
A woman does not reveal her age? That is a totally lame!
January 10th, 2006 at 6:33 am - IP Man-Hash: 05876c7260a2f
not as lame as
January 10th, 2006 at 10:38 am - IP Man-Hash: f3ae1ac46a2e3
Yes, and you are. The giant neon sign that says “Chip on her shoulder!” is spot on as well, wolfe. Nicely done.
-Dick
January 10th, 2006 at 6:12 pm - IP Man-Hash: e616b9a6becce
Female said: “You don’t know my age. Take a guess. I’ll be honest and let you know if right or wrong.”
and again a short while later: “a woman does not reveal her age.”
One must assume then that one of these is a lie. Thus, as one cannot debate a liar, for all credibility of words is gone, to debate you is pointless since your words cannot be trusted. I believe that would be check mate, then men are victorious once more.
January 10th, 2006 at 6:57 pm - IP Man-Hash: f75c92aeb197e
Ah yes, you should try thinking sometime. But all you are doing now is desperately trying to conjure up a get out clause as you have posted yourself into a corner as usual. Your babblespeak translated into English reads:
So by that argument if a woman is approached by a guy who stares at her cleavage and thinks to herself ‘Gee, this guy really respects me’, what sort of respect does such a woman deserve?
The answer is that she deserves about as much respect as someone who is dumb enough to confuse physical attraction with respect.
Nope. I’ve never come across one that turned into a Jet-Ski.
No need to thank me for pointing out the obvious.
January 10th, 2006 at 7:16 pm - IP Man-Hash: f75c92aeb197e
Sorry Oldone I missed your post.
You are of course right. Still, its fun to see Female post full of defiance while waving her little feminazi flag and then gradually see her disappear down the big hole that she has dug for herself.
January 10th, 2006 at 9:47 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5475964f1d333
If you are saying it is redundant to debate her, then I guess the following is also irrelevant.
January 11th, 2006 at 12:21 am - IP Man-Hash: 05876c7260a2f
oldone, I understand if you are too nervous to dispute valid points with me. I also know you have a real interest in non-sequiturs, but just so you know, I would have confirmed my age had wolfe’s guess been correct. I was even generous to indicate a second time whether his second assumption was right or wrong. There the only guesses I’m going to allow or respond to. Like I said, the topic is now closed.
January 11th, 2006 at 12:53 am - IP Man-Hash: 05876c7260a2f
Geezer, you don’t interpret the meaning of my posts correctly. Either this is because you are distracted/biased/whatever, by your hateful feelings towards me or you are simply a poor reader. I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and believe it’s the former, rather than the later.
If you are a poor reader, I apologise and would like to direct your attention to the following:
“My thinking is along the lines that a man wouldn’t really approach a women unless she had already earned his respect. If his respect is for her legs or chest, then that’s what it is.”
Note the use of the word “if” which is used to imply a possibility, not a definitive.
You also seemed to miss my discussion with wolfe about this point above. We both already decided admiration was distinct from respect, from the point of view of both sexes. In the words of oldone, “do try to keep up dear.”
PS: I haven’t seen one of those dolphin convertibles yet, but did you know they can also turn themselves into suicide bombers. I hope you don’t take your test-drive on one of those…
http://espn.go.com/outdoors/general/news/2003/0327/1530384.html
January 11th, 2006 at 5:37 am - IP Man-Hash: f75c92aeb197e
Oh I do. Its just that your posts go round in circles without going anywhere. This normally happens when you are trying to prove a point which is pointless. Feminazis typically do this when they bark about equality and then apply different rules to men and women.
Whether you use “if” as a posibility or a definitive is immaterial. You cannot even bear to think about the possibility of women actually having to earn respect.
A woman not wanting to take responsibilty. Now where have I heard that before.
Interesting article. You should actually read it sometime. The dolphins arent suicide bombers. They aid the navy in detecting mines. But seriously….
Dolphins turn themselves into Jet Skis???
January 11th, 2006 at 10:33 am - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
Amen, Brother.
She deserves that, alas. Well done.
Old one said (see above):
Yeah. I’m afraid I reluctantly believe Female is lying about her age. Kinda sad.
Her mismatched condescension also troubles me. Oh well, so be it. On the plus side, she is actually somewhat smarter than most here think she is, so she may well come out with some worthwhile comments. She’s also not evil.
-wolfe
January 11th, 2006 at 4:01 pm - IP Man-Hash: f75c92aeb197e
The way she goes on and on, probability alone dictates that she will eventually come up with something worthwhile……even if its just by accident.
January 12th, 2006 at 4:05 am - IP Man-Hash: 05876c7260a2f
How do you know that? How many of your friends might one day choose to nudge a bomb, rather than glide straight past one? How will we ever know if it was accidental or deliberate? Aside from jet-ski’s and terrorists, dolphins can also turn themselves into sushi.
January 12th, 2006 at 6:21 am - IP Man-Hash: f75c92aeb197e
You’ve just added a new female law to debating with a male:
Stage 3.3) When you have lost an argument, start talking complete nonsense.
January 12th, 2006 at 6:37 am - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
Geeza, I think that’s partially covered by
Granted, she may be deliberately talking nonsense, which is something I hadn’t considered. If so, that perhaps would be a corollary of the fourth law,
I therefore propose the Geeza corollary:
-wolfe
January 12th, 2006 at 6:40 am - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
And it is now added. Thank you, Geeza.
(http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/forums/post-186.html#186)
-wolfe
November 6th, 2007 at 10:18 pm - IP Man-Hash: 47e070fd87755
I think that Wolfe and Female should get married. Look how thye love each other and compliment each other ad nauseum. I don’t know if a marriage between two gay people from different genders qualify as a gay marriage, but it’s not a straight marriage either. It would be the first recorded case of a faggot and a dyke tying the knot. How lovely!
P Coderch
May 13th, 2008 at 6:21 am - IP Man-Hash: 2bc5844a0f6c6
wow its clear that the boys on this site know nothing about girls!!!!……so many assumptions