Women Ruined Mel Gibson

Who doesn’t love Mel Gibson? I disagree with anyone who doesn’t. Not on account of their opinion, but because they’re obviously lying.

Mel Gibson ushered in a new area and archetype of hard ass, ass kicking in movies. He’s the Nicolas Cage of the 80’s. It’s hard to believe, but a mullet would get you laughed at before Mel Gibson gave it his Man Stamp of Manproval. And does anyone besides me remember the action movie scene before Mel introduced us to Mad Max? It was awesome. Then Mel happened and all movies B.G. (Before Gibson) looked like shite.

That’s a never ending well of Man Points as I see it. Minus fifty for taking the mullet five years too far and plus a billion for showing us Sigourney Weaver is just a woman after all.

Mel may have said some inflammatory things recently. And first I want to say I would defend to the death his right to say them. Don’t forget about that.

Besides it’s all women’s fault.

The whole Sugar Tits thing I can say for sure no woman actually gives a fuck about. I’ve called policewomen Sugar Tits before and I don’t have the box office grossings of China. Not even close. You can look that stat up as well if you’re a man. Women can’t count commas.

Celebrities are people and they have eccentricities. Remember when OJ murdered his wife? I don’t remember everyone throwing a hissy fit about that.

That’s exactly my point. This isn’t a problem with Mel Gibson. This is a problem with women. Women want every man they meet to be their father. And they all want their fathers to be God. They can’t do shit or take care of shit on their own, so they need to believe they’re being literally watched over by an infallible, untouchable, invincible Superman who can wash away their woes and fuckups when they’re having whatever problems women have. I don’t know what the fuck those are. Probably having to figure out a map or decide what size Cappuccino would go best with their handbag.

In other words: stupid, non-problems.

And another thing. Women make no separation between opinions, thoughts, and actions. That’s why you’d get slapped by your significant other for checking out a girl jogging in the park. To a woman, that’s the same as raping her. It’s horrible and tasteless I know, but when are women any different.

So what happened here? Some billionaire got drunk and said a bunch of shit he otherwise wouldn’t. Big fucking news. That doesn’t happen every single day of the year. It’s just not every day that the drunken billionaire happens to be every woman in the English speaking world’s father. Then it’s a big deal.

It’s a big deal and it’s completely true. Women ruined Mel Gibson.

Related Articles:

RSS feed | Trackback URI

81 Comments in 81 threads.»

Comment by King Wang
2007-12-08 06:41:12

Actually, I am surprised that by now the Jews haven’t blamed it all on Hitler. That is their usual excuse……..(besides screaming, “It wasn’t me!”)other than every religion but their own.

Nick is right, any problems Mel has is because of Mel, but having a boatload of pissed off Jews certainly can’t be very helpful……..

Mel should probably make another Lethal Weapon, but with Jews and banks…..that might fix it. If it had Seinfeld in it, the press would be fine with it then. Well, right up until Hillary and Obama fought over who he would endorse………

 
Comment by mike5150
2007-12-08 06:26:27

He’s not ruined. Nobody cares about the comments he made. That’s the press trying to blow things out of proportion.

Certain people have been waiting to nail him since he made his movie on Christ. I guess maybe he should blamed the Irish.

 
Comment by nick
2007-12-08 02:06:50

mel gibson ruined mel gibson.

 
Comment by King Wang
2007-12-04 16:23:49

Considering the current debate is running wild about Jewry and Hollywood, I have no statistical facts, but yes, he probably did fuck up a little.

The upside? He has so much money it doesn’t matter whether anyone likes him or not. Now THAT is a man………..

Kramer fucked up, as a white guy, by now, he should know you get with a group of white guys, get drunk, and tell black jokes.

Nope, I am not rascist, however, I AM a realist.

-It only sucks when you are on the losing end of the shit stick-

 
Comment by Hilary
2007-12-04 15:43:11

I think what ruined his carreer was insulting Jews
Then again, Michael Richards probably didn’t too good of a carreer choice either

 
Comment by kristina
2007-09-22 23:11:38

mel gibson rocks…but seriouly :/ i do NOT (november october tango) want my bf/hubby to be like my daddy…that is not only scary and creepy…but sick and wrong :P…im all for originality lol

 
Comment by P Coderch
2007-08-10 15:19:01

I think that the modern “intellectuals” os the West should take an advice from a man long dead:

“I have seen beauty in precision.”

Leonhard Euler - Swiss mathematician

P Coderch

 
Comment by P Coderch
2007-08-10 15:14:53

wolfe said:

son of the suns said:

I’d like to fly an F22, but I don’t want to go through 4 years of binge drinking, slut banging, baby sitting school (US college) just to be an officer.

Everyone friend I know who went to college never does a god damn thing but drink, drug, fuck, and play video games. I have no clue how they pass.

Oh wait, I just remembered. They lowered the requirements so much for feminist social engineering that any man with moderate intelligence can breeze by. And the chicks can just suck professor cock.

The key of course is to study at a sound school in an area that women haven’t yet overrun and devalued. Engineering, physics, pure maths are all good. Journalism, law, commerce are all increasingly bad. I’m not saying it’s not possible to get a good education studying those things; I’m saying the deck is stacked against you getting one these days.

And forget about Social Work, Social “sciences”, most arts. Psychology? Please. Medicine’s becoming increasingly doubtful as well.

But, look for an area that’s still 85% male, and you’re more than likely to learn something valuable.

sonyad said:

It is said the best in people only comes out in times of hardship. Perhaps the injustices and needless hardships that feminism induces will eventually bring about the better in women along with newfound realisation and wisdom?

Probably not.

Yeah, I’m afraid I’m with you there.

-wolfe

For once, and I hate to admi it, I agree with Wolfe. Physicists, mathematicians and a few branches of philosophers are the last real intellectuals that the West has. All other areas produces nothing more than pseudo-scientists who are good at relativistic verbal babbling and terrible at logical thinking. Even economics has been affected by PC fantasies, and it is just a shame.

P Coderch

 
Comment by Doubt
2007-06-02 01:28:56

You know, ‘Jon,’ identity impersonation is a federal offense. You know, you sluts are always talking about how you’ll abuse your vagina privilages and get us sued for rape. Just thought I’d put that out there.
No hard feelings, though you are a fine example of penis envy at its worst - and therefore it’s funniest.

 
Comment by Cuthburt Higgensbottom
2007-06-01 23:43:17

I disagree my good friend Mrs. Lachlan’s Mum was once called sugar tits as she is a police officer and they need a tranquilizer just to calm the poor woman down. But I digress would a man police officer be just as angry if you called him a dickhead? cockhead? fuckhead? Or some other comment about his masculinity? I Think so! I’ve been called this many times and its gets me so angry. ANGRY! And for the record I RUINED MEL GIBSON! And your a big stinky poo head in the pants. Case in point if you are not nice. Therefore, Mrs. Lachlan’s Mum will come and beat your with her autographed copy of the Female Eunuch.

That is all
~Cuthbert Higgensbottom

P.S. I have shown this link to my good friend Nigel Bottington and he has determined that you are gay. GAY!

 
Comment by jon
2007-03-03 11:54:55

kl said:

the sugar tits i dont mind but the other things he said were out of line.

Suck muh ballz Kl

 
Comment by jon
2007-03-03 11:42:18

Dick Masterson said:

Female said:

It is true that the Jews did kill Jesus, saying that or portraying that is not anti-semitic, for it’s the facts.

The Jews didn’t kill Jesus, you stupid, anti-semetic cow. A few people who were Jewish killed Jesus.

-Dick

Ya dick your right a few jewish higher ups demanded the romans kill jesus. But the romans nailed his arms and legs to the cross.

 
Comment by Necroswordsman
2007-02-16 10:16:54

Back on topic, Mel Gibson was a god alongside people like Nicolas Cage and Jack Nicholson.

 
Comment by kl
2007-02-16 10:13:39

the sugar tits i dont mind but the other things he said were out of line.

 
Comment by ashes of the wake
2006-09-02 22:28:06

Dick Masterson said:

Female is what happens when a woman doesn’t have any friends to annoy with her inane email forwards.

-Dick

ROFL. True Dick, True.

 
Comment by Dick Masterson
2006-08-30 16:58:43

Female is what happens when a woman doesn’t have any friends to annoy with her inane email forwards.

-Dick

 
Comment by Female
2006-08-27 19:44:41

wolfe said:

Those are funny (and groaningly old, but still worth repeating), Female, but how are they relevant to the thread? Just askin’.

This was as close to a religious thread that I could find here. The rest of your post I’m not touching.

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-08-27 19:36:59

Those are funny (and groaningly old, but still worth repeating), Female, but how are they relevant to the thread? Just askin’.

24. St. paul cavorted to christianity, he preached holy acrimony which is another name for marraige.

Some would say there’s a deep theological point there…

-wolfe

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-08-27 17:39:30

Hillarious. Kids are clearly much better at amusing people than women.

 
Comment by Female
2006-08-27 16:46:42

These are answers to a religious test by elementary school children, about the various characters in the Bible. Incorrect spelling has been left in.

1. In the first book of the bible, Guinessis. God got tired of creating the world so he took the Sabbath off.

2. Adam and eve were created from an apple tree. Noah’s wife was Joan of ark. Noah built and ark and the animals came on in pears.

3. Lots wife was a pillar of salt during the day, but a ball of fire during the night.

4. The Jews were a proud people and throughout history they had trouble with unsympathetic genitals.

5. Sampson was a strongman who let himself be led stray by a jezebel like Delilah.

6. Samson slayed the philistines with the axe of the apostles.

7. Moses led the jews to the red sea where they made unleavened bread which is bread without any ingredients .

8. The egyptians were all drowned in the dessert. Afterwards, Moses
went up to mount cyanide to get the ten commandments.

9. The first commandments was when eve told Adam to eat the apple.

10. The seventh commandment is thou shalt not admit adultery.

11. Moses died before he ever reached Canada. Then Joshua led the hebrews in the battle of geritol.

12. The greatest miricle in the bible is when Joshua told his son to stand still and he obeyed him.

13. David was a hebrew king who was skilled at playing the liar. he fought the finkelsteins, a race of people who lived in biblical times.

14. Solomon, one of Davids sons, had 300 wives and 700 porcupines.

15. When Mary heard she was the mother of Jesus, she sang the magna carta.

16. when the three wise guys from the east side arrived they found Jesus in the manager.

17. Jesus was born because Mary had an immaculate contraption.

18. St. john the blacksmith dumped water on his head.

19. Jesus enunciated the golden rule, which says to do unto others before they do one to you. He also explained a man doth not live by sweat alone.

20. It was a miricle when Jesus rose from the dead and managed to get the tombstone off the entrance.

21. The people who followed the lord were called the 12 decibels.

22. The epistels were the wives of the apostles.

23. One of the oppossums was St. Matthew who was also a taximan.

24. St. paul cavorted to christianity, he preached holy acrimony which is another name for marraige.

25. Christians have only one spouse. This is called monotony.

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-08-22 16:12:03

Or you can go fly Migs over Moscow with nothing but the dough being prerequisite.

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-08-22 16:09:07

son of the suns said:

I’d like to fly an F22, but I don’t want to go through 4 years of binge drinking, slut banging, baby sitting school (US college) just to be an officer.

Everyone friend I know who went to college never does a god damn thing but drink, drug, fuck, and play video games. I have no clue how they pass.

Oh wait, I just remembered. They lowered the requirements so much for feminist social engineering that any man with moderate intelligence can breeze by. And the chicks can just suck professor cock.

The key of course is to study at a sound school in an area that women haven’t yet overrun and devalued. Engineering, physics, pure maths are all good. Journalism, law, commerce are all increasingly bad. I’m not saying it’s not possible to get a good education studying those things; I’m saying the deck is stacked against you getting one these days.

And forget about Social Work, Social “sciences”, most arts. Psychology? Please. Medicine’s becoming increasingly doubtful as well.

But, look for an area that’s still 85% male, and you’re more than likely to learn something valuable.

sonyad said:

It is said the best in people only comes out in times of hardship. Perhaps the injustices and needless hardships that feminism induces will eventually bring about the better in women along with newfound realisation and wisdom?

Probably not.

Yeah, I’m afraid I’m with you there.

-wolfe

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-08-22 15:47:56

It is said the best in people only comes out in times of hardship. Perhaps the injustices and needless hardships that feminism induces will eventually bring about the better in women along with newfound realisation and wisdom?

Probably not.

 
Comment by Big Al
2006-08-22 06:52:24

biff said:
Granted he did piss away every gift (the entire treasury of Rome) from the gods on wine, women, and litter bearers.

Almost every gift, Biff. The remainder he just squandered.

-Big Al

 
Comment by Billy
2006-08-22 01:11:38

abaddon_fff said:
The only thing that most women can create, is a child. They lack the initiative to create anything else, thats why most of their lives are spent in search of things that are already here (a man, a child, ect ect).

-Strength and Honor- (Some things that women cannot understand)

Not true, women don’t really create the child. They have the body that does it all. I would think that nature does all the work. Women can’t even deliver the baby without someone telling them when to breathe and push. Women only create MISery and MISchief.

 
Comment by diamatik
2006-08-19 15:57:49

son of the suns said:

They lowered the requirements so much for feminist social engineering that any man with moderate intelligence can breeze by. And the chicks can just suck professor cock.

Can’t wait till they realize their degree doesn’t mean a fucking thing to the new corporate order and their high paying jobs got shipped to places where people who are judged by their work ethic do the job for 1/10 of what westerners will do.

I’ve never looked at it that way before. I have never really considered a link between feminism and outsourcing. I’m not saying that I agree or disagree with you, but I think that was a pretty good hypothesis to ponder.

 
Comment by son of the suns
2006-08-19 15:18:53

I’d like to fly an F22, but I don’t want to go through 4 years of binge drinking, slut banging, baby sitting school (US college) just to be an officer.

Everyone friend I know who went to college never does a god damn thing but drink, drug, fuck, and play video games. I have no clue how they pass.

Oh wait, I just remembered. They lowered the requirements so much for feminist social engineering that any man with moderate intelligence can breeze by. And the chicks can just suck professor cock.

Can’t wait till they realize their degree doesn’t mean a fucking thing to the new corporate order and their high paying jobs got shipped to places where people who are judged by their work ethic do the job for 1/10 of what westerners will do.

I hope they have fun paying their college loans off working at Mcdonalds.

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-08-19 09:21:57

And I want to fly a Mig 31 before I die.
The difference is one can see why I want that whereas one finds it hard to see why you’d “just want to be able to get off the ship before it sinks”.

Do you really mean the US?!

 
Comment by biff
2006-08-19 09:12:37

“Rome” was magnificent as an HBO film on so many levels. I eagerly await it’s return. Pollo saying “that whore had better fuck like Athena with her ass on fire, or I’ll know the reason why” shows a man who knows the value of services rendered. Granted he did piss away every gift (the entire treasury of Rome) from the gods on wine, women, and litter bearers.

There are so many similarities between the sole super-powers of AD 1 and AD 2000. It seems rich people/countries forget the qualities that made them that way. Perhaps it is simply the natural order of life. Personally I just want to be able to get off the ship before it sinks.

 
Comment by son of the suns
2006-08-18 17:35:47

I agree fully.
From your sig, I sense you’ve seen Gladiator. I recommend the HBO show “Rome” for anyone who hasn’t seen it. It is a disturbing mirror of western society and the US especially.

Roman females couldn’t vote, but they had their manipulative little fingers deep in the power structure. Just like now, a world built by masculinity gave them a paradise of comfort and ease. And just as now, they lied, cheated, and fucked their way to get what they want… using a decadent senate of fat lesser males as their henchmen.

One of these sluts called “Atia” tried to seduce Marc Antony into abandoning Caesar, proclaiming himself King and taking her as his wife. Naturally… Antony called her a scuzzy skank, and went on his way. Not before she smacked his face. Why? Because men are better than women.

Now, it’s not all popular to defend authoritarian government in our modern world, but Rome was a republic just like us before it was shattered. Caesar wasn’t some evil villian. He was a general. A hero without fear. And then the corrupt feminist controlled whore known as the Senate turned against their savior! I look at Caesar crossing the Rubicon as a last chance to save thousands of years of Roman history from the destructive impulses of the feminine. And to bring BALANCE back to a world that desparately needed it.

 
Comment by abaddon_fff
2006-08-18 15:16:29

Long have I said that we currently live in a matriarchal society and while everything in nature tends torward entrophy, its my belief that societies such as this are inherently entropic per se. They collapse upon themselves because they’re out of balance.

Women are inherently manipulative, it’s a part of their nature. After all they cannot do half of the things that men can, thats why they fear the truth, it would expose all of their little mind games. They had to evolve that way, in order for them to survive on this ball of shit we call Earth.

Notice how they are, once things are made for them, and they can survive on their own, most of us are thrown away, and considered useless, even though we are the ones that created all of this. The only thing that most women can create, is a child. They lack the initiative to create anything else, thats why most of their lives are spent in search of things that are already here (a man, a child, ect ect).

-Strength and Honor- (Some things that women cannot understand)

 
Comment by son of the suns
2006-08-18 03:59:01

True diamatik. Of course something wrong with us. We are goodly men in a society of beta-male and feminist domination. What I don’t understand is how these absent minded hussies think bringing up the past injuries that brought us here will convert us to their side? I guess “womens strategy” only includes making your enemy hate you even more than they already did, with no possibilty of peace.

I’m sure many of us came here from troubled childhoods and/or broken hearts. I did. But who cares? Truth is truth. Once you get ahold of it you can’t abandon it. You have to nurse that shit before the destructive forces kill it. Of course, theres nothing women fear more than the truth, most especially their deepest true nature.

That’s why men are better than women.

 
Comment by Dick Masterson
2006-08-18 00:55:59

You’re absolutely right, diamatik. Every single woman who posts here is automatically a troll. They should be treated as such.

-Dick

 
Comment by diamatik
2006-08-17 21:25:49

Hey, isn’t every woman that comments on this site a de facto troll? They are banned, but they still post here and start pointless arguements and try to deny the wealth of facts that have been presented by Dick on his website. They come with their statements :

1. insinuating that something is wrong with the men who post here (troubled childhoods, broken hearts etc),
2. of insults based on size of penis
3. of shrill cursing and incoherent babble.

These women are here for one purpose only … to desecrate this bastion of manliness.

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-08-17 04:36:49

Baiting behaviour? Luka wouldn’t know trolling if it came up behind her back and married her fat arse.

Which reminds me of something, but I can’t really put my finger on it.

 
Comment by Luka
2006-08-17 03:11:57

wolfe said:

Therefore my apologies. I treated you like a woman posting on this site, not a long-standing member of the site who happens to be female. That, I think, was unfair of me.

Apology accepted. Thank you wolfe.

Reflecting on my comment, I can see how you may have viewed it as odd, but to see it as baiting behaviour? I cannot say I agree.

Having said that, it is true that my comment was a flippant and throw-away remark. I am not usually that careless with my comments on this board, this might be why you found my comment odd.

Anyway, all that is bygones now. I accept your apology so we can move on.

Thanks again,

Luka

 
Comment by Dick Masterson
2006-08-16 18:32:15

sots, I had not yet made that connection.

-Dick

 
Comment by son of the suns
2006-08-16 17:14:32

Alcohol has given me a powerful manvision.

Fem’s avatar on the forums is a panda. Coincidence? Absolutely not. Pandas and feminists share a great many things in common.

They’re both fat, lame, impotent, and on the verge of a rightous extinction..

I was watching Chinese TV the other day, and there was a documentary about panda mating. A male was sitting in a tree looking out upon the world below him, probably just contemplating the world. Women don’t do that. A bitch in heat approaches him to for attention, he growled. She did not back off. He attacked her until she left.

Just like Fem should.

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-08-16 12:29:26

Luka said:

That is the most ridiculous thing you have ever said to me wolfe.

Perhaps. I simply found your comment odd, almost baiting. It didn’t seem something a man would write. It didn’t fit with what you usually write. I’d ask you to reflect on that, but please keep reading.

May I also remind you that flame wars are started by trolls of both genders on the internet,

Very true.

so to suggest that I ‘crave a flame war, deep down’ as part of my ‘femaleness’ is a silly comment to make.

Again, perhaps you’re right. I stand by the view that women seem to like drama though. I stand by the view that that was an odd, atypical comment for you, a highly rational person, to make.

That said, it’s unfair of me to pick apart everything or anything you say; your good humor, obvious intelligence, and membership of this site for some time give you a pass on being over-analyzed, by me at least. You’re one of the ‘good guys’, and I should have acknowledged that.

Therefore my apologies. I treated you like a woman posting on this site, not a long-standing member of the site who happens to be female. That, I think, was unfair of me.

To be clear, I still think it was an atypical comment; I still think women love drama. I don’t, however, impugn your motives, and your analysis appears to be entirely correct, judging by the last few posts.

Humble regards,
-wolfe

 
Comment by son of the suns
2006-08-16 10:28:15

Wrong on everything as usual. Projection is psychology for 8th graders…or any woman. Must have learned it in Wymmymz Studiez.

And I have no left over issues with my ex-fiance. The last thing I said to her was “good luck” after my cousin invited me over to see her trying to fuck him. Then she assaulted me, of course the cops do nothing.

Why did I say “good luck”? Because I took the keys to her new Explorer and dumped it in a river. She was stranded at my cousins 30 miles from her subsidized slut apt. He generously told her “walk home bitch”. She had the nerve to call me all the next day begging me to pick her up. She said “she wouldn’t press charges”. I told her go ahead, I’m a fucking vet.

I have no reason to be mad. I have unlimited victory over her. The only obstacles that remain are a society you traitors have built that rewards this type of godless, scumbag beheavior. Her free single-mother slut apartment paid for by workers and her free college degree that western sluts think is the new bible.

But don’t worry female, I promise before I die.. you and all your ball sizing nazi slut wannabes will be shipped to the near east to get a true lesson in the nature of masculine power.

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-08-16 09:06:15

What creative blend of rhetoric monologue, lyrical expletives and narrated epic fiction! What words, what soul, what explicitness! Both son of the suns and Female’s post are indicative of literary prowess. Most entertaining!

Pssst, IMHO the bleeding reference thingy was a thinly veiled hit on that time of the non-menopausal woman’s month. You know, Red Storm Rising and all that. Nasty. No need for masochism though.

 
Comment by Female
2006-08-16 06:07:49

Fuck off and bleed to death female, you fat cow.

lol okay. What, should I just cut myself now then?

We’re not you’re beta-male failure of a boyfriend who says leave but doesn’t mean it.

Are you talking about yourself and your last breakup because that doesn’t play out like the death scene did in my one.

When we say leave we don’t mean go out with your bitchy little friends to get drunk and let them pick at your “partner� like vultures and encourage you to fuck the bartender.

Okay, firstly the “when we say” may apply to me but the rest is one seriously wild tangent. Your ex-girlfriends friend’s don’t sound like they ever liked you. Gee, wonder why.

We don’t want you to suck off the bartender in the parking lot then come back to us and demand an apology for “taking you for granted�.

Thanks for sharing but I don’t need to hear anymore about your pathetic little relationship. If that’s what you called it. You gf clearly had no respect for herself or you. Again, I don’t need to think too hard to work out why that was.

We mean get the fuck out for good and don’t let the door hit your fat bovine ass on the way out.

Let me guess, she left you, but in your repeated recalls of the breakup you dearly wish that you had of said that line to her. Pity you didn’t, now I have to cop it.

Cunt.

Prick.

 
Comment by son of the suns
2006-08-16 04:03:58

Calling someone an “inbred hick” or “hillbilly” isn’t what I’d call intelligent.

More like a bigot metropolitan fembot lashing out any anti-rural/anti-american bs she can spit out of her promotion(bj) hole.

 
Comment by Luka
2006-08-16 03:27:10

That is the most ridiculous thing you have ever said to me wolfe.

I have no interest in starting flame wars, if I were I would be attacking other posters on a personal level like some other posters on here (i.e son of suns or nicole) but as you can see, I am not.

Truth be told, I am sick of flame wars and know where they can begin. They are a pointless waste of time. I am interested in discussion, ideas, and communication. So when I see that another poster is attacking someone on a personal level rather than debating their arguments I cannot help but sigh and roll my eyes.

May I also remind you that flame wars are started by trolls of both genders on the internet, so to suggest that I ‘crave a flame war, deep down’ as part of my ‘femaleness’ is a silly comment to make.

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-08-15 21:56:58

Luka: I don’t think we need to. I’d put it to you that your femaleness makes you crave a flame war, deep down. (I may be wrong; fair enough.) But women — even highly rational ones — do love drama.

son of the suns, Female’s posting intelligently; I’d say leave her be and hit her hard when she acts like an idiot. Just my view; you’re a man and can take your own advice.

In vino veritas, and Sony’s “What if he drank scotch” lines remain the best in this thread so far.

-wolfe

 
Comment by Luka
2006-08-15 14:03:34

Oh dear.

Thus we spiral back into a flame war, yet again.

 
Comment by son of the suns
2006-08-15 13:43:48

Fuck off and bleed to death female, you fat cow.

We’re not you’re beta-male failure of a boyfriend who says leave but doesn’t mean it. When we say leave we don’t mean go out with your bitchy little friends to get drunk and let them pick at your “partner” like vultures and encourage you to fuck the bartender. We don’t want you to suck off the bartender in the parking lot then come back to us and demand an apology for “taking you for granted”.

We mean get the fuck out for good and don’t let the door hit your fat bovine ass on the way out.

Cunt.

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-08-15 08:35:52

Ah well, I’ll break the peace by posting!

On Sonyad’s comments on people only talking about the Holocaust. Indeed, very sadly the Holocaust was not unique in man’s hatred. The salting of Carthage, the Rape of the Sabine women, the Armenian genocide, the slaughter of the Kulaks, Stalin’s Katyn Forest massacre, the Rape of Nanking, the Killing Fields of Cambodia, the Great Leap Forward, the Rwandan Massacres… one could go on and on.

However, the Holocaust was unique in that list in two respects: first, it was conducted by a “modern”, “civilized”, “Western European”, “Christian” country. Countries appear to take centuries to move out of barbarism and into at least some degree of civilization. It now appears that veneer was preciously thin in the case of Europe; Germany at least.

Second, it was germane to the subject matter at hand: to wit, Gibson’s anti-semitic remarks. Other massacres weren’t; it’s why I didn’t mention them or reflect upon them until Sony brought them up.

We could put red herrings into every conversation I suppose and say “Oh that’s bad, but so are these other non-related matters”. It would make discussions very long, however.

As to being cautious about injecting religious aspects into a debate there are several issues. First, religion can serve as a fulcrum for non-rational (not necc. wrong) views that cannot be readily refuted; second, a site like this tends to be very pluralistic on such matters.

On Female’s comments. Your point is [sadly, and fortunately only, historically] theologically correct, much to the shame of the church. Dick’s point is well-taken and has been the main-stream theological view of Christians for a very long time now. Thankfully. That said, yes his film was appropriate, no I do not believe his film was anti-Semitic.

Billy: on the point that Gibson was upset because his movie was trashed pretty hard by many Jews. Maybe. I admit I find that a creepy, yet all-too-human explanation. Not an excuse mind you. Not remotely.

In vino veritas.

Not original, but original to this site (and possibly independently original). Well stated diamatik.
-wolfe

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-08-15 08:04:38

It’s so peaceful around here. Too peaceful. We need some trolling to get things going again.

Come on ladies, step up to the plate and show us you’re here.

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-08-15 07:58:27

What if he drunk scotch?

 
Comment by diamatik
2006-08-15 07:44:41

In vino veritas. Since he did that whole movie in latin, that Mel Gibson dude should know what it means.

Perhaps he did mean what he said, but he is just an actor/producer so his statements are non gradus anus rodentum! Who gives a rats’ ass what some actor has to say about shit when he is drunk? Only WOMEN!

Men tend to only be concerned about such statements when they are made by important people say them, not what some actor says.

Women, on the other hand, are concerned by shit they read in the The National Enquirer, Star Magazine, The Weekly World News, News of the World, The People The New Idea, The New Weekly, The Sun, Hello! and other shitty tabloid-press nonsense. Women are their only demographic. If these printed versions of toilet-paper never existed then the whole Gibson thing would have never made a headline anywhere.

 
Comment by diamatik
2006-08-15 05:43:51

Billy said:

thanks for faking some concern like everything you women do… Just fake it.. Intelligence, orgasms, Love, Concern, friendships and creativity.

You forgot to add integrity, responsibility and the ability to drive.

 
Comment by Female
2006-08-15 01:37:23

I wasn’t faking billy. There was no concern. Period. And seeing as you couldn’t tell, I don’t care what anyone here thinks of my opinion. Least of all you.

It doesn’t make any sense to go somewhere and try to argue you points when nobody… I mean no one likes you or wants you here.

Just for you hillbilly, I’ll explain. I’m not arguing points here with anyone, I’m giving my opinion, just as others, such as yourself, are trying to shove your own down my throat. Now, if this site had subscription fees and I was a member that hadn’t paid up, then I could understand your intolerance. As it stands, this is an open, subscription free site and I will therefore voice my goddamn opinion when and how I please. If you don’t like it, don’t read it. Simple. And if Dick didn’t want to display my posts, then he wouldn’t. Comprehende? If not, try this, just shut it.

 
Comment by Billy
2006-08-14 19:50:14

Female said:

Billy you inbred hick. The next time you have 3 months to spare in the slammer, read the rest of this site and get a bloody clue.

I’m not inbred but thanks for faking some concern like everything you women do… Just fake it.. Intelligence, orgasms, Love, Concern, friendships and creativity.
Also never been in the slammer and I have clue about you already.

It doesn’t make any sense to go somewhere and try to argue you points when nobody… I mean no one likes you or wants you here.
Only a women could be so stupid.

The clue train arrived and brought you a sign “STUPID!”

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-08-14 13:33:29

slick

 
Comment by Dick Masterson
2006-08-14 12:35:38

Female would warm up to anything with a pulse.

-Dick

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-08-14 11:21:05

Billy you inbred hick.

Billy, I’d say Female’s warming up to you.

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-08-14 10:39:28

Just you wait till I get my Idish mojo on.

 
Comment by Big Al
2006-08-14 06:14:01

sonyad said:
They may teik ar lives, but they shall never teik ar meikap.

Look out! Sony’s channelling ha ha ha.

-Big Al

 
Comment by Billy
2006-08-14 03:42:35

Mel was spouting off because many Jews gavae him such a hard time about the movie. Then again they don’t like anything with Jesus in it.

 
Comment by Female
2006-08-14 02:22:23

Billy you inbred hick. The next time you have 3 months to spare in the slammer, read the rest of this site and get a bloody clue.

 
Comment by Dick Masterson
2006-08-13 23:01:48

That’s because women have never heard of the Middle East, Chris.

-Dick

 
Comment by Chris
2006-08-13 21:45:59

The way I see it the guy was bombed, freaked out, and said some things that most people would not say. What I want to know is what provoked him? People just don’t get pulled over bombed and then start cussing about Jews and calling cops Sugar Tits. We need context here!
Besides, I wonder if this would be news if a well-known Jewish actor got pulled over, bombed, and blaimed the Arabs for the problems in the Middle East? Doubt it!

 
Comment by Billy
2006-08-13 21:19:35

Female you retard. There was nothing he said that made him a bigot.
I don’t understand why you women enjoy pushing yourselves into places that you’re not welcome.

Since most women are incapable of making people happy you find it easier to annoy the hell out of people and you get some cheap thrill out of it.

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-08-13 16:55:49

Female, your post just goes to show women should refrain from discussing religion. It demeans the subject matter.

Please stick to ballistic pandas and concussion dolphins.

 
Comment by Female
2006-08-13 13:41:44

Dick Masterson said:

Female said:

It is true that the Jews did kill Jesus, saying that or portraying that is not anti-semitic, for it’s the facts.

The Jews didn’t kill Jesus, you stupid, anti-semetic cow. A few people who were Jewish killed Jesus.

Aside from the fact that I’m definately not anti-semetic, the very fact that you, a clear goddamn BIGOT, are trying to take the high moral ground against me, is just downright stupid.

 
Comment by Dick Masterson
2006-08-13 11:19:35

Because of women, gwallan. It’s their fault.

-Dick

 
Comment by gwallan
2006-08-13 09:18:52

Back on the farm…
Why the hell does anybody give a tinkers toss what Mel Gibson thinks? Especially if he was drunk? Why do people continue to give such credence to anything any old celebrity gushes forth. I don’t give a stuff how famous, or rich, he is he remains an actor.

 
Comment by Dick Masterson
2006-08-13 08:53:45

Female said:

It is true that the Jews did kill Jesus, saying that or portraying that is not anti-semitic, for it’s the facts.

The Jews didn’t kill Jesus, you stupid, anti-semetic cow. A few people who were Jewish killed Jesus.

-Dick

 
Comment by Billy
2006-08-13 07:30:55

His death was the single most important event in the Life of Christ. For we all have forgiveness thru this event.
But I think it showed too much of the agony and not enough of the wisdom he brought us. The Jewish people were responsible for his death which was foretold and had to be. The Jewish people need to stop being such babies. And I am related to them.

 
Comment by Female
2006-08-13 02:07:26

It is true that the Jews did kill Jesus, saying that or portraying that is not anti-semitic, for it’s the facts. However, it’s people who hate Jews and who spit out that they killed Christ in a derogatory manner that are anti-semitic. And really, if the story is true, then the Jews were acting on behalf of God and Jesus who both pre-determined his death for our own good. So if you believe that he died so that we might live, then the Jews did everyone a favour by pushing for his crucifixtion. If they didn’t, then we’d all be fucked regardless of our religion.

Thus ends religion 101 for today.

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-08-13 01:49:57

Aha. Gouge. I erred. :)

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-08-13 01:43:53

That ‘PAUL SCOTT’ fellow seems anything but neutral to me. In fact, he seems a mightily biased evil little fuck.

I think the crux of the matter is a lot of people are gauging their eyes out for passing on such a golden opportunity money maker as the “Passion of the Christ” is. Don’t get me wrong, I myself feel it’s one of the best and most appropriate films ever made. Certainly the best about the life or moments in the life of Jesus.

Altogether a very successful film, despite its “rabid antisemitism”. Which is a piece of shit line it being totally untrue, if you ask either Maia Morgenstern or me. We’d both happily oblige. By that measure all devout muslims are antisemites. Oops.

Those people, the very ones screaming antisemitism when the film came out and kicking themselves a week later, now see this as the perfect occasion to stick it to mister Max.

 
Comment by Billy
2006-08-12 23:30:37

The Catholic church believes and has taught him that non-RC’s go to hell. The Church of his choice has taught him that. I think they are both wrong.
I don’t what he said about the holocaust but I have researched it on my own. I have even seen videos of Jews who deny it. I don’t know either way but there is some strong theories of massive lies and coverups.
Indeed many Jews died in concentration camps and so did many others.
Those other groups don’t have a protected status or documentaries in their honor that I am aware of. I am not anti-Jew for I am related to them.

Wolfe’s reluctance appears to be a humble disagreement.

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-08-12 18:03:55

Indeed.

 
Comment by sonyad
2006-08-12 18:02:19

In a better world people would be remotely as indignant about other massive human tragedies as they are about the Holocaust. And other wroughters of genocide as they are the nazis. In a better world no one would side with the strong against the weak. “In a better world”…

Alas, ignorance and indifference gets the better of such empathy as evil gets the better of (not necessarily through) those who blatantly deny or claim against the veridicity of the Holocaust.

I don’t see how one’s not believing in the Holocaust would lead to one’s fall in disgrace or damnation, or what have you. Not even overtly claiming so (and thereby purportedly corrupting others of luke faith). No, in no way I do not.

Nor indeed talking about one’s spouse like that. Sure, it’s weird, it’s distasteful, even immoral to say so about one’s wife. But from there to saying it might cost you the grace God invested in you is again quite a long stretch.

Funny how people will be apologetic for their Christian faith or before introducing religion (so long as it’s Christian faith) to a conversation, but rise up in proletarian anger at the Holocaust. Food for thought. Laicisation of society and separation of the powers in state, or some warping of culture much more insidious than that?

Especially considering the very strong link between the Christian faith in God and the cultural and juridical foundations of western society. In the space of a century it’s become queer, for lack of a better word, almost shameful to unhypocritically affirm one’s faith in public. Perhaps in another 50 years people will frown upon churches in their vicinity. The land value around them would probably reflect that.

Most certainly, being an affirmed Christian is already somewhat of a stigma for a self-respecting intellectual and “free-thinkers”.

Indeed, as the media bombards people with misandrist fallacies so too does it with subtle or o