Women Ruined Mel Gibson
Who doesn’t love Mel Gibson? I disagree with anyone who doesn’t. Not on account of their opinion, but because they’re obviously lying.
Mel Gibson ushered in a new area and archetype of hard ass, ass kicking in movies. He’s the Nicolas Cage of the 80’s. It’s hard to believe, but a mullet would get you laughed at before Mel Gibson gave it his Man Stamp of Manproval. And does anyone besides me remember the action movie scene before Mel introduced us to Mad Max? It was awesome. Then Mel happened and all movies B.G. (Before Gibson) looked like shite.
That’s a never ending well of Man Points as I see it. Minus fifty for taking the mullet five years too far and plus a billion for showing us Sigourney Weaver is just a woman after all.
Mel may have said some inflammatory things recently. And first I want to say I would defend to the death his right to say them. Don’t forget about that.
Besides it’s all women’s fault.
The whole Sugar Tits thing I can say for sure no woman actually gives a fuck about. I’ve called policewomen Sugar Tits before and I don’t have the box office grossings of China. Not even close. You can look that stat up as well if you’re a man. Women can’t count commas.
Celebrities are people and they have eccentricities. Remember when OJ murdered his wife? I don’t remember everyone throwing a hissy fit about that.
That’s exactly my point. This isn’t a problem with Mel Gibson. This is a problem with women. Women want every man they meet to be their father. And they all want their fathers to be God. They can’t do shit or take care of shit on their own, so they need to believe they’re being literally watched over by an infallible, untouchable, invincible Superman who can wash away their woes and fuckups when they’re having whatever problems women have. I don’t know what the fuck those are. Probably having to figure out a map or decide what size Cappuccino would go best with their handbag.
In other words: stupid, non-problems.
And another thing. Women make no separation between opinions, thoughts, and actions. That’s why you’d get slapped by your significant other for checking out a girl jogging in the park. To a woman, that’s the same as raping her. It’s horrible and tasteless I know, but when are women any different.
So what happened here? Some billionaire got drunk and said a bunch of shit he otherwise wouldn’t. Big fucking news. That doesn’t happen every single day of the year. It’s just not every day that the drunken billionaire happens to be every woman in the English speaking world’s father. Then it’s a big deal.
It’s a big deal and it’s completely true. Women ruined Mel Gibson.
Related Articles:


















August 16th, 2006 at 10:28 am - IP Man-Hash: 4b3d96762ad9d
Wrong on everything as usual. Projection is psychology for 8th graders…or any woman. Must have learned it in Wymmymz Studiez.
And I have no left over issues with my ex-fiance. The last thing I said to her was “good luck” after my cousin invited me over to see her trying to fuck him. Then she assaulted me, of course the cops do nothing.
Why did I say “good luck”? Because I took the keys to her new Explorer and dumped it in a river. She was stranded at my cousins 30 miles from her subsidized slut apt. He generously told her “walk home bitch”. She had the nerve to call me all the next day begging me to pick her up. She said “she wouldn’t press charges”. I told her go ahead, I’m a fucking vet.
I have no reason to be mad. I have unlimited victory over her. The only obstacles that remain are a society you traitors have built that rewards this type of godless, scumbag beheavior. Her free single-mother slut apartment paid for by workers and her free college degree that western sluts think is the new bible.
But don’t worry female, I promise before I die.. you and all your ball sizing nazi slut wannabes will be shipped to the near east to get a true lesson in the nature of masculine power.
August 16th, 2006 at 12:29 pm - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
Perhaps. I simply found your comment odd, almost baiting. It didn’t seem something a man would write. It didn’t fit with what you usually write. I’d ask you to reflect on that, but please keep reading.
Very true.
Again, perhaps you’re right. I stand by the view that women seem to like drama though. I stand by the view that that was an odd, atypical comment for you, a highly rational person, to make.
That said, it’s unfair of me to pick apart everything or anything you say; your good humor, obvious intelligence, and membership of this site for some time give you a pass on being over-analyzed, by me at least. You’re one of the ‘good guys’, and I should have acknowledged that.
Therefore my apologies. I treated you like a woman posting on this site, not a long-standing member of the site who happens to be female. That, I think, was unfair of me.
To be clear, I still think it was an atypical comment; I still think women love drama. I don’t, however, impugn your motives, and your analysis appears to be entirely correct, judging by the last few posts.
Humble regards,
-wolfe
August 16th, 2006 at 5:14 pm - IP Man-Hash: 3120917f1d11e
Alcohol has given me a powerful manvision.
Fem’s avatar on the forums is a panda. Coincidence? Absolutely not. Pandas and feminists share a great many things in common.
They’re both fat, lame, impotent, and on the verge of a rightous extinction..
I was watching Chinese TV the other day, and there was a documentary about panda mating. A male was sitting in a tree looking out upon the world below him, probably just contemplating the world. Women don’t do that. A bitch in heat approaches him to for attention, he growled. She did not back off. He attacked her until she left.
Just like Fem should.
August 16th, 2006 at 6:32 pm - IP Man-Hash: 6897e3ddf8ad0
sots, I had not yet made that connection.
-Dick
August 17th, 2006 at 3:11 am - IP Man-Hash: af8f493b67ea8
Apology accepted. Thank you wolfe.
Reflecting on my comment, I can see how you may have viewed it as odd, but to see it as baiting behaviour? I cannot say I agree.
Having said that, it is true that my comment was a flippant and throw-away remark. I am not usually that careless with my comments on this board, this might be why you found my comment odd.
Anyway, all that is bygones now. I accept your apology so we can move on.
Thanks again,
Luka
August 17th, 2006 at 4:36 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Baiting behaviour? Luka wouldn’t know trolling if it came up behind her back and married her fat arse.
Which reminds me of something, but I can’t really put my finger on it.
August 17th, 2006 at 9:25 pm - IP Man-Hash: 9f2962878c29c
Hey, isn’t every woman that comments on this site a de facto troll? They are banned, but they still post here and start pointless arguements and try to deny the wealth of facts that have been presented by Dick on his website. They come with their statements :
1. insinuating that something is wrong with the men who post here (troubled childhoods, broken hearts etc),
2. of insults based on size of penis
3. of shrill cursing and incoherent babble.
These women are here for one purpose only … to desecrate this bastion of manliness.
August 18th, 2006 at 12:55 am - IP Man-Hash: cb70aab47603e
You’re absolutely right, diamatik. Every single woman who posts here is automatically a troll. They should be treated as such.
-Dick
August 18th, 2006 at 3:59 am - IP Man-Hash: c2d4147fd6b5e
True diamatik. Of course something wrong with us. We are goodly men in a society of beta-male and feminist domination. What I don’t understand is how these absent minded hussies think bringing up the past injuries that brought us here will convert us to their side? I guess “womens strategy” only includes making your enemy hate you even more than they already did, with no possibilty of peace.
I’m sure many of us came here from troubled childhoods and/or broken hearts. I did. But who cares? Truth is truth. Once you get ahold of it you can’t abandon it. You have to nurse that shit before the destructive forces kill it. Of course, theres nothing women fear more than the truth, most especially their deepest true nature.
That’s why men are better than women.
August 18th, 2006 at 3:16 pm - IP Man-Hash: 732987aa5d932
Long have I said that we currently live in a matriarchal society and while everything in nature tends torward entrophy, its my belief that societies such as this are inherently entropic per se. They collapse upon themselves because they’re out of balance.
Women are inherently manipulative, it’s a part of their nature. After all they cannot do half of the things that men can, thats why they fear the truth, it would expose all of their little mind games. They had to evolve that way, in order for them to survive on this ball of shit we call Earth.
Notice how they are, once things are made for them, and they can survive on their own, most of us are thrown away, and considered useless, even though we are the ones that created all of this. The only thing that most women can create, is a child. They lack the initiative to create anything else, thats why most of their lives are spent in search of things that are already here (a man, a child, ect ect).
-Strength and Honor- (Some things that women cannot understand)
August 18th, 2006 at 5:35 pm - IP Man-Hash: 14c711174f850
I agree fully.
From your sig, I sense you’ve seen Gladiator. I recommend the HBO show “Rome” for anyone who hasn’t seen it. It is a disturbing mirror of western society and the US especially.
Roman females couldn’t vote, but they had their manipulative little fingers deep in the power structure. Just like now, a world built by masculinity gave them a paradise of comfort and ease. And just as now, they lied, cheated, and fucked their way to get what they want… using a decadent senate of fat lesser males as their henchmen.
One of these sluts called “Atia” tried to seduce Marc Antony into abandoning Caesar, proclaiming himself King and taking her as his wife. Naturally… Antony called her a scuzzy skank, and went on his way. Not before she smacked his face. Why? Because men are better than women.
Now, it’s not all popular to defend authoritarian government in our modern world, but Rome was a republic just like us before it was shattered. Caesar wasn’t some evil villian. He was a general. A hero without fear. And then the corrupt feminist controlled whore known as the Senate turned against their savior! I look at Caesar crossing the Rubicon as a last chance to save thousands of years of Roman history from the destructive impulses of the feminine. And to bring BALANCE back to a world that desparately needed it.
August 19th, 2006 at 9:12 am - IP Man-Hash: 49c9ff889fded
“Rome” was magnificent as an HBO film on so many levels. I eagerly await it’s return. Pollo saying “that whore had better fuck like Athena with her ass on fire, or I’ll know the reason why” shows a man who knows the value of services rendered. Granted he did piss away every gift (the entire treasury of Rome) from the gods on wine, women, and litter bearers.
There are so many similarities between the sole super-powers of AD 1 and AD 2000. It seems rich people/countries forget the qualities that made them that way. Perhaps it is simply the natural order of life. Personally I just want to be able to get off the ship before it sinks.
August 19th, 2006 at 9:21 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
And I want to fly a Mig 31 before I die.
The difference is one can see why I want that whereas one finds it hard to see why you’d “just want to be able to get off the ship before it sinks”.
Do you really mean the US?!
August 19th, 2006 at 3:18 pm - IP Man-Hash: 381b8c2338cde
I’d like to fly an F22, but I don’t want to go through 4 years of binge drinking, slut banging, baby sitting school (US college) just to be an officer.
Everyone friend I know who went to college never does a god damn thing but drink, drug, fuck, and play video games. I have no clue how they pass.
Oh wait, I just remembered. They lowered the requirements so much for feminist social engineering that any man with moderate intelligence can breeze by. And the chicks can just suck professor cock.
Can’t wait till they realize their degree doesn’t mean a fucking thing to the new corporate order and their high paying jobs got shipped to places where people who are judged by their work ethic do the job for 1/10 of what westerners will do.
I hope they have fun paying their college loans off working at Mcdonalds.
August 19th, 2006 at 3:57 pm - IP Man-Hash: 4555637db20cf
I’ve never looked at it that way before. I have never really considered a link between feminism and outsourcing. I’m not saying that I agree or disagree with you, but I think that was a pretty good hypothesis to ponder.
August 22nd, 2006 at 1:11 am - IP Man-Hash: 15c058d6adf8f
Not true, women don’t really create the child. They have the body that does it all. I would think that nature does all the work. Women can’t even deliver the baby without someone telling them when to breathe and push. Women only create MISery and MISchief.
August 22nd, 2006 at 6:52 am - IP Man-Hash: eadd56da2c7c9
Almost every gift, Biff. The remainder he just squandered.
-Big Al
August 22nd, 2006 at 3:47 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
It is said the best in people only comes out in times of hardship. Perhaps the injustices and needless hardships that feminism induces will eventually bring about the better in women along with newfound realisation and wisdom?
Probably not.
August 22nd, 2006 at 4:09 pm - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
The key of course is to study at a sound school in an area that women haven’t yet overrun and devalued. Engineering, physics, pure maths are all good. Journalism, law, commerce are all increasingly bad. I’m not saying it’s not possible to get a good education studying those things; I’m saying the deck is stacked against you getting one these days.
And forget about Social Work, Social “sciences”, most arts. Psychology? Please. Medicine’s becoming increasingly doubtful as well.
But, look for an area that’s still 85% male, and you’re more than likely to learn something valuable.
Yeah, I’m afraid I’m with you there.
-wolfe
August 22nd, 2006 at 4:12 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Or you can go fly Migs over Moscow with nothing but the dough being prerequisite.