Women Ruined Mel Gibson
Who doesn’t love Mel Gibson? I disagree with anyone who doesn’t. Not on account of their opinion, but because they’re obviously lying.
Mel Gibson ushered in a new area and archetype of hard ass, ass kicking in movies. He’s the Nicolas Cage of the 80’s. It’s hard to believe, but a mullet would get you laughed at before Mel Gibson gave it his Man Stamp of Manproval. And does anyone besides me remember the action movie scene before Mel introduced us to Mad Max? It was awesome. Then Mel happened and all movies B.G. (Before Gibson) looked like shite.
That’s a never ending well of Man Points as I see it. Minus fifty for taking the mullet five years too far and plus a billion for showing us Sigourney Weaver is just a woman after all.
Mel may have said some inflammatory things recently. And first I want to say I would defend to the death his right to say them. Don’t forget about that.
Besides it’s all women’s fault.
The whole Sugar Tits thing I can say for sure no woman actually gives a fuck about. I’ve called policewomen Sugar Tits before and I don’t have the box office grossings of China. Not even close. You can look that stat up as well if you’re a man. Women can’t count commas.
Celebrities are people and they have eccentricities. Remember when OJ murdered his wife? I don’t remember everyone throwing a hissy fit about that.
That’s exactly my point. This isn’t a problem with Mel Gibson. This is a problem with women. Women want every man they meet to be their father. And they all want their fathers to be God. They can’t do shit or take care of shit on their own, so they need to believe they’re being literally watched over by an infallible, untouchable, invincible Superman who can wash away their woes and fuckups when they’re having whatever problems women have. I don’t know what the fuck those are. Probably having to figure out a map or decide what size Cappuccino would go best with their handbag.
In other words: stupid, non-problems.
And another thing. Women make no separation between opinions, thoughts, and actions. That’s why you’d get slapped by your significant other for checking out a girl jogging in the park. To a woman, that’s the same as raping her. It’s horrible and tasteless I know, but when are women any different.
So what happened here? Some billionaire got drunk and said a bunch of shit he otherwise wouldn’t. Big fucking news. That doesn’t happen every single day of the year. It’s just not every day that the drunken billionaire happens to be every woman in the English speaking world’s father. Then it’s a big deal.
It’s a big deal and it’s completely true. Women ruined Mel Gibson.
Related Articles:
August 14th, 2006 at 3:42 am - IP Man-Hash: 6dc82b8beba78
Mel was spouting off because many Jews gavae him such a hard time about the movie. Then again they don’t like anything with Jesus in it.
August 14th, 2006 at 6:14 am - IP Man-Hash: eadd56da2c7c9
Look out! Sony’s channelling ha ha ha.
-Big Al
August 14th, 2006 at 10:39 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Just you wait till I get my Idish mojo on.
August 14th, 2006 at 11:21 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Billy, I’d say Female’s warming up to you.
August 14th, 2006 at 12:35 pm - IP Man-Hash: 6897e3ddf8ad0
Female would warm up to anything with a pulse.
-Dick
August 14th, 2006 at 1:33 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
slick
August 14th, 2006 at 7:50 pm - IP Man-Hash: 6dc82b8beba78
I’m not inbred but thanks for faking some concern like everything you women do… Just fake it.. Intelligence, orgasms, Love, Concern, friendships and creativity.
Also never been in the slammer and I have clue about you already.
It doesn’t make any sense to go somewhere and try to argue you points when nobody… I mean no one likes you or wants you here.
Only a women could be so stupid.
The clue train arrived and brought you a sign “STUPID!”
August 15th, 2006 at 1:37 am - IP Man-Hash: c20b47cbcee08
I wasn’t faking billy. There was no concern. Period. And seeing as you couldn’t tell, I don’t care what anyone here thinks of my opinion. Least of all you.
Just for you hillbilly, I’ll explain. I’m not arguing points here with anyone, I’m giving my opinion, just as others, such as yourself, are trying to shove your own down my throat. Now, if this site had subscription fees and I was a member that hadn’t paid up, then I could understand your intolerance. As it stands, this is an open, subscription free site and I will therefore voice my goddamn opinion when and how I please. If you don’t like it, don’t read it. Simple. And if Dick didn’t want to display my posts, then he wouldn’t. Comprehende? If not, try this, just shut it.
August 15th, 2006 at 5:43 am - IP Man-Hash: 4555637db20cf
You forgot to add integrity, responsibility and the ability to drive.
August 15th, 2006 at 7:44 am - IP Man-Hash: 4555637db20cf
In vino veritas. Since he did that whole movie in latin, that Mel Gibson dude should know what it means.
Perhaps he did mean what he said, but he is just an actor/producer so his statements are non gradus anus rodentum! Who gives a rats’ ass what some actor has to say about shit when he is drunk? Only WOMEN!
Men tend to only be concerned about such statements when they are made by important people say them, not what some actor says.
Women, on the other hand, are concerned by shit they read in the The National Enquirer, Star Magazine, The Weekly World News, News of the World, The People The New Idea, The New Weekly, The Sun, Hello! and other shitty tabloid-press nonsense. Women are their only demographic. If these printed versions of toilet-paper never existed then the whole Gibson thing would have never made a headline anywhere.
August 15th, 2006 at 7:58 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
What if he drunk scotch?
August 15th, 2006 at 8:04 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
It’s so peaceful around here. Too peaceful. We need some trolling to get things going again.
Come on ladies, step up to the plate and show us you’re here.
August 15th, 2006 at 8:35 am - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
Ah well, I’ll break the peace by posting!
On Sonyad’s comments on people only talking about the Holocaust. Indeed, very sadly the Holocaust was not unique in man’s hatred. The salting of Carthage, the Rape of the Sabine women, the Armenian genocide, the slaughter of the Kulaks, Stalin’s Katyn Forest massacre, the Rape of Nanking, the Killing Fields of Cambodia, the Great Leap Forward, the Rwandan Massacres… one could go on and on.
However, the Holocaust was unique in that list in two respects: first, it was conducted by a “modern”, “civilized”, “Western European”, “Christian” country. Countries appear to take centuries to move out of barbarism and into at least some degree of civilization. It now appears that veneer was preciously thin in the case of Europe; Germany at least.
Second, it was germane to the subject matter at hand: to wit, Gibson’s anti-semitic remarks. Other massacres weren’t; it’s why I didn’t mention them or reflect upon them until Sony brought them up.
We could put red herrings into every conversation I suppose and say “Oh that’s bad, but so are these other non-related matters”. It would make discussions very long, however.
As to being cautious about injecting religious aspects into a debate there are several issues. First, religion can serve as a fulcrum for non-rational (not necc. wrong) views that cannot be readily refuted; second, a site like this tends to be very pluralistic on such matters.
On Female’s comments. Your point is [sadly, and fortunately only, historically] theologically correct, much to the shame of the church. Dick’s point is well-taken and has been the main-stream theological view of Christians for a very long time now. Thankfully. That said, yes his film was appropriate, no I do not believe his film was anti-Semitic.
Billy: on the point that Gibson was upset because his movie was trashed pretty hard by many Jews. Maybe. I admit I find that a creepy, yet all-too-human explanation. Not an excuse mind you. Not remotely.
Not original, but original to this site (and possibly independently original). Well stated diamatik.
-wolfe
August 15th, 2006 at 1:43 pm - IP Man-Hash: 33213a30d8c3d
Fuck off and bleed to death female, you fat cow.
We’re not you’re beta-male failure of a boyfriend who says leave but doesn’t mean it. When we say leave we don’t mean go out with your bitchy little friends to get drunk and let them pick at your “partner” like vultures and encourage you to fuck the bartender. We don’t want you to suck off the bartender in the parking lot then come back to us and demand an apology for “taking you for granted”.
We mean get the fuck out for good and don’t let the door hit your fat bovine ass on the way out.
Cunt.
August 15th, 2006 at 2:03 pm - IP Man-Hash: af8f493b67ea8
Oh dear.
Thus we spiral back into a flame war, yet again.
August 15th, 2006 at 9:56 pm - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
Luka: I don’t think we need to. I’d put it to you that your femaleness makes you crave a flame war, deep down. (I may be wrong; fair enough.) But women — even highly rational ones — do love drama.
son of the suns, Female’s posting intelligently; I’d say leave her be and hit her hard when she acts like an idiot. Just my view; you’re a man and can take your own advice.
In vino veritas, and Sony’s “What if he drank scotch” lines remain the best in this thread so far.
-wolfe
August 16th, 2006 at 3:27 am - IP Man-Hash: af8f493b67ea8
That is the most ridiculous thing you have ever said to me wolfe.
I have no interest in starting flame wars, if I were I would be attacking other posters on a personal level like some other posters on here (i.e son of suns or nicole) but as you can see, I am not.
Truth be told, I am sick of flame wars and know where they can begin. They are a pointless waste of time. I am interested in discussion, ideas, and communication. So when I see that another poster is attacking someone on a personal level rather than debating their arguments I cannot help but sigh and roll my eyes.
May I also remind you that flame wars are started by trolls of both genders on the internet, so to suggest that I ‘crave a flame war, deep down’ as part of my ‘femaleness’ is a silly comment to make.
August 16th, 2006 at 4:03 am - IP Man-Hash: b3057326538a5
Calling someone an “inbred hick” or “hillbilly” isn’t what I’d call intelligent.
More like a bigot metropolitan fembot lashing out any anti-rural/anti-american bs she can spit out of her promotion(bj) hole.
August 16th, 2006 at 6:07 am - IP Man-Hash: c20b47cbcee08
lol okay. What, should I just cut myself now then?
Are you talking about yourself and your last breakup because that doesn’t play out like the death scene did in my one.
Okay, firstly the “when we say” may apply to me but the rest is one seriously wild tangent. Your ex-girlfriends friend’s don’t sound like they ever liked you. Gee, wonder why.
Thanks for sharing but I don’t need to hear anymore about your pathetic little relationship. If that’s what you called it. You gf clearly had no respect for herself or you. Again, I don’t need to think too hard to work out why that was.
Let me guess, she left you, but in your repeated recalls of the breakup you dearly wish that you had of said that line to her. Pity you didn’t, now I have to cop it.
Prick.
August 16th, 2006 at 9:06 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
What creative blend of rhetoric monologue, lyrical expletives and narrated epic fiction! What words, what soul, what explicitness! Both son of the suns and Female’s post are indicative of literary prowess. Most entertaining!
Pssst, IMHO the bleeding reference thingy was a thinly veiled hit on that time of the non-menopausal woman’s month. You know, Red Storm Rising and all that. Nasty. No need for masochism though.