Sports Are a Woman’s Best Friends. She Hates Them.
If I could go back in time and invest in something that would make me millions of Pounds Sterling, it would be this:
If there’s ever any kind of man-sanctuary from women’s constant BS (bullshit), it will immediately be overrun and ruined by women.
That’s a rock fucking solid investment. And it’s been true since the first primitive man said to himself, ‘Fuck. Woman are annoying.’ Then made a crude caveman type sign that said, ‘No fucking women allowed in this cave today.’ Then found himself ass deep in women.
That’s how women operate. They’re like locusts. They have no respect for anything — especially themselves.
What I’m talking in this case is the hallowed halls of sport and sporting. So rich they are with man-ness that fully grown men are want to fall to their knees and weep. But they don’t, because there’s no fucking crying in sports. Even in victory there’s no crying, because that’s completely fucking embarrassing. Suck it up.
When a woman starts talking about the outcome of an event of sport — talking like she actually gives a shit about it or has the first clue as to why it’s monuMANtally important — I politely roll my eyes, make a sour face, and think to myself.
I sure hope you have a dick, lady. Because otherwise you’re completely full of shit.
Women who claim to be interested in sports are complete frauds and, like usual, are lying to get attention.
There has never been a woman interested in any sport. And when I say any sport I mean baseball and football and soccer and the sorts of things played by men. Girl-soccer and girl-hockey and softball played without a keg on second base are not sports. They’re charity.
Need proof? Probably not because whenever a woman talks about how much she loves sports she sounds about as genuine as a pedophile on Halloween.
Here’s some proof anyway.
1. Most women haven’t gotten off their ass in ever. At the age of twelve, women give up all physical activity and begin a long life of posturing and posing and sitting on comfy ottomans while slinging catty remarks at one another. When it comes to sports they have absolutely no frame of reference.
2. You can’t be an alcoholic unless you drink by yourself. The same is true for being a sports fan. It’s great to scream and cheer at the bar, but do you think any woman has ever had a San Jose Sharks logo on her underwear without anyone else knowing about it? No. Because if she did she’d take the next bus to San Jose and start trolling the sports bars half naked. I’ve seen it a hundred times.
Here comes the most important reason. This is the big money investment.
3. Listen to a woman after her “favorite” sports team (which is always coincidentally the exact same team as the mate or mates she’s trying to attract) has won the game. What will you hear? Only the following:
“They won!”
They? What the fuck they? As men, we all know what any legitimate sports fan would say.
“We won!”
Because we men know that they as a fan — and as a man — we had just as much to do with the victory as some Gatorade-swilling, hot-ass-model-wife-having, endorsement-jerking so-called “athlete” with their million dollar shoe and perfume deals.
And that’s why women hate sports.
Related Articles:
August 4th, 2005 at 3:40 pm - IP Man-Hash: cc0d45fa29251
I have dedicated my whole existence attempting to find a way to organize a community where women don’t tread. There are already Moose and Elk lodges, Lion’s clubs (but women have fucked them up already) and any odd sort of men running around with tricycles, minuature motorcycles, and a sweet fez on their noggin. The problem sems to be to eliminate the weiner-rubbing that seems to take place. I have recognized Al Bundy’s organization of NO MA’AM as the most successful men-only organization as-of-yet and plan to use it as a base platform to build my empire.
August 5th, 2005 at 6:31 am - IP Man-Hash: 46d8304bbb9af
Dick, this may sound shocking but I like sport. Did you die of a heart attack….damn so close.
August 5th, 2005 at 5:21 pm - IP Man-Hash: f3ae1ac46a2e3
I think you’re mistaking atheletes for “sport”, Nicole.
Beckham is not a sport no matter what your mother tells you.
-Dick
August 6th, 2005 at 6:25 am - IP Man-Hash: 76897c96619f9
Nicole likes sport huh? You play any ‘ball’ games honey? Good with your bat handling? Like to get down to the member’s end and face a couple of fast ones?
August 8th, 2005 at 1:36 pm - IP Man-Hash: 46d8304bbb9af
Actually I’m into racket sports Dick, but thanks for asking :)
August 12th, 2005 at 5:26 am - IP Man-Hash: b0e7aae980b2e
Dick, I was directed several weeks ago to this website and have enjoyed it immensely. Your thoughts are always accurate and I concur with all of them. I’m distressed that the women who comment here can’t seem to take simple directions. For example, it plainly states on the masthead, “No women allowed.” Yet, there seems to be a sizeable number of women who either don’t understand this simple rule or refuse to honor it. This website, like a football or baseball team, should be visited and the topics herein should be discussed only by men. As in tennis and golf, women should remain apart from the relevant portion of the population, i.e. men.
August 13th, 2005 at 8:17 am - IP Man-Hash: 7098936dc14b3
You’d be fucking bored if there were no women to counter attack your pathetic claims. Stop complaining that women are defending themselves and their gender in every one of you bollocks comments.
August 13th, 2005 at 10:37 am - IP Man-Hash: ac62c77584632
Nicole, that’s just great. But how about you go post that kind of bullshit about yourself that no one here or anywhere gives a fuck about on your myspace account — or whatever other girlie little attention whoring bio page you’ve got littered like trash around the internet.
-Dick
August 13th, 2005 at 3:49 pm - IP Man-Hash: 46d8304bbb9af
Oooo Dicks getting testy that someone else is talking about their personal lives.
“no one here or anywhere gives a fuck about” Do you really think we were all gripped on the edge of our seats to hear about how you like to wear a “man bag (formally known as a handbag)”. I know I wasn’t.
God you haven’t actually visited my website have you? That’s for my friends, not over the hill losers like you.
August 13th, 2005 at 3:51 pm - IP Man-Hash: 46d8304bbb9af
By the way, if you don’t care what sports women play, you really shouldn’t dedicate a page of you’re website to bitching about it.
Just a suggestion.
August 16th, 2005 at 2:37 am - IP Man-Hash: fe5718ff4a80b
I happened across the womens football (soccer) world cup the other day while channel hopping. They were shit.
August 17th, 2005 at 5:30 am - IP Man-Hash: 884e4e6bf5eb9
Okay, shitmeister, I’d just like to point out that I’m a BIG sports fan and I’m female. I follow the english cricket team, currently on the 4th ashes test, im watching the england vs denmark match tonight, and I gave myself laryngitis after england beat australia in the rugby world cup final. I play compettitive tennis and beat the shit outta my male friends that play me at it. I’d just like to say, go suck yourself, you bastard woman-hating femme-o-phobe. You’re just scared we’re just as good as any of you at anything, if not better. It is well known that women have a higher pain threshold and are less likely to whine about pain than men. Also, we have to cope with alot more than alot of you typical men who sit back and force the women into doing ALL the chores. Maybe you should try and help one day and realise it’s not an easy ride. My father helps out all the time, in our household, everything is in equal share.
Well, I’ve had enough, I’ve got better things to do. Sayonara shitface.
August 17th, 2005 at 8:55 am - IP Man-Hash: a0c7c73d83830
A higher pain threshold!? What exactly is this threshold measured in? Paincibles? Wpp — or Whimpers Per Pound?
That’s one of the most womanly preposterous things I’ve ever heard!
A pain threashold! Laughable!
As if there could ever be any kind of scientific research done to prove that.
You’ve boggled my mind, Never you mind. Truly you’re a credit to your gender.
Did you scream yourself hoarse during or after the game? I’ve heard that rugby teams have some debaucherous celebration practices. That’s why I ask.
-Dick
August 17th, 2005 at 9:55 am - IP Man-Hash: b0e7aae980b2e
It seems that many women, “Never You Mind” included, enjoy thrusting their chins forward and claiming that “…I beat the shit out of my male friends…” or “…we’re just as good as any of you at anything.” Must this be countered? Isn’t the truth obvious??? Why would someone say something like this? There is only one answer; Never You Mind is delusional. I can picture her slumping about her tiny, catshit littered apartment, diarrhea dried to her legs, murmurring to herself as she eats cold asparagus spears out of a can. To counter her claims would be tantamount to arguing with a running sore. Still, it makes one dizzy to hear such things. I get the same feeling when I listen to Rosie O’Donnell.
August 18th, 2005 at 8:01 am - IP Man-Hash: 6a9283bd40454
Never you mind,
you said:
“It is well known that women have a higher pain threshold…”
This is, in fact, the opposite of what is well known. In the case of childbirth,
a number of biochemical changes occur to allow women to manage the pain better;
but in general, men’s pain threshold is higher for physical injuries.
http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=51160
“According to feminine lore, guys simply don’t handle pain well. The tiniest twinge of discomfort is enough to reduce most men into helpless, whimpering heaps. Women, on the other hand, can handle the tough stuff. In fact, you can ratchet up the old pain-o-meter to agony and beyond and most women will soldier on without flinching.”
“The trouble with that theory is — it’s wrong. And now men have the science to prove it. ”
“The laboratory research seems to indicate that for many kinds — but not all kinds — of stimuli, women have a lower tolerance for pain,” says Linda LeResche, ScD, a professor of oral medicine at the University of Washington, in Seattle.
August 18th, 2005 at 8:34 am - IP Man-Hash: f3ae1ac46a2e3
Linda LeResche, congratulations! You’re MenAreBetterThanWomen.com’s Honorary Man of the Month!
-Dick
August 18th, 2005 at 2:37 pm - IP Man-Hash: a082e652f712e
You are probably so fucking up tight about woman, because none have ever seen any worth in you, and put you in your goddamn place. if that doesn’t stand true, then perhaps you’ve never been laid, and now prefer it in the ass, because you couldn’t get any from a chick.
Don’t hate on women because you are a cock sucking bastard. I don’t put up shit with your kind, and your mother should have had a fucking abortion. Face it, douche bag, you wouldn’t even be here if it wasn’t for your goddamn mother. Last i checked men couldn’t give birth. So unless your father shit you out, shut the fuck up.
August 18th, 2005 at 3:10 pm - IP Man-Hash: f3ae1ac46a2e3
Ah, Kat. What a delightful commentary on anything and everything. Thanks for stopping by.
I think that brings MenAreBetterThanWomen.com’s gay hating female contingent to six now? Seven? Are any of the men here keeping track.
I do have one question for you though, “I don’t put up shit with your kind”. What in the bejesus does that mean? Or better yet, what do you think it means? Because just like the rest of your screed, I can tell you that what is actually means is dick.
-Dick
August 18th, 2005 at 3:39 pm - IP Man-Hash: 3dddc19b55aad
Kat,
not that I’m advocating this; but I thought you might be interested…
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,648024,00.ht ml
“Scientists have developed an artificial womb that allows embryos to grow outside the body”
August 19th, 2005 at 4:44 am - IP Man-Hash: b0e7aae980b2e
Kat’s rapier-like wit and deft logic have skewered her adversaries. It’s refreshing to read such comments and it gives one an idea of what she must look like.
August 25th, 2005 at 8:04 pm - IP Man-Hash: a082e652f712e
what ever, this site is such bull shit.
August 25th, 2005 at 9:53 pm - IP Man-Hash: ac62c77584632
Kat, did you have to reach an eight word quota with that post or something?
Like I’ve always said. Women can’t spell for shit.
-Dick
August 26th, 2005 at 4:46 am - IP Man-Hash: b0e7aae980b2e
Kat is a wordsmith and a logician.
November 13th, 2005 at 12:03 am - IP Man-Hash: 957564b4aff6d
re: pain tolerance
(I know, still floating around where I’m not wanted - like a turd in a broken toilet)
My husband and my 18-month old son both have a much higher tolerance for pain than I do. My husband actually went 48 hours on a burst appendix. That is definitely not something I would have been able to do!
November 20th, 2005 at 3:21 am - IP Man-Hash: 8066b11f8da5d
The bard himself, Shakespeare comes to mind !!!
Almost…….
November 20th, 2005 at 3:45 am - IP Man-Hash: 637bafa67bded
Arielle, as a woman, that’s something you wouldn’t be dumb enough to do.
November 20th, 2005 at 4:33 am - IP Man-Hash: ac62c77584632
Wow. How insulting. Guess she should have married a “lesbian”.
-Dick
November 20th, 2005 at 5:04 am - IP Man-Hash: 637bafa67bded
That might be your fantasy but it isn’t mine.
November 20th, 2005 at 10:18 pm - IP Man-Hash: 957564b4aff6d
It wasn’t “dumb” - he was MISDIAGNOSED at the first hospital we took him to. The doctor said he had a virus.
I’ve tried to be very respectful while commenting on this board. If you mess with my man, that may change.
November 21st, 2005 at 12:59 am - IP Man-Hash: dd25bee8154fe
Well I can’t guarantee that I won’t mess around with him if he’s on these boards and comes across like a sexist pig. If he stays away, there shouldn’t be a problem.
November 21st, 2005 at 1:38 am - IP Man-Hash: ac62c77584632
Jesus, you’re a dumb bitch, Female. You insulted a woman because her husband was misdiagnosed by a medical professional and then have the gaul to promise to do so again.
The first time you had sex was with a guy who was fucking you as a joke wasn’t it.
-Dick
November 21st, 2005 at 1:52 am - IP Man-Hash: dd25bee8154fe
Again, that is your fantasy. You really need to stop with these projections.
November 21st, 2005 at 1:57 am - IP Man-Hash: ac62c77584632
Molested by your mother then? Something had to damage you beyond repair.
Whatever the case, you should be imprisoned from society — or at least revoked of the priviledge of having children to befoul with your sick abuse addiction.
-Dick
November 21st, 2005 at 2:03 am - IP Man-Hash: ef58dd1b8c32e
ROFL. In Christian’s words, “looked in the mirror lately?”
November 21st, 2005 at 2:13 am - IP Man-Hash: ac62c77584632
How impressive. The “I know you are, but what am I?” defense. Well played, mule.
-Dick
November 21st, 2005 at 3:44 am - IP Man-Hash: 140d93d99d74d
At least we have one sensible female on board.
November 21st, 2005 at 8:52 pm - IP Man-Hash: d754ab99d7c00
Female seems to have a talent for that. She made some unpleasant and gratuitous remarks about my girlfriend; ever since then I’ve had difficulty viewing her words other than through a sheen of contempt. She is quick to curse, quick with a bigoted slur (ethnic, racial, sexual preference, gender or religious), and very eager to engage in harsh unfounded personal attacks. Dick’s responses to her may seem harsh, but I fear she has earned them. Do watch out for her.
Christian: “At least we have one sensible female on board.” Provisionally, I agree.
-wolfe.
November 21st, 2005 at 10:05 pm - IP Man-Hash: 957564b4aff6d
Well said, Wolfe. You don’t know me, and only have access to a few of my opinions. (Though I do appreciate the compliment, Christian J.) There are certainly areas in which I’m not very sensible - but I am smart enough to know that feminism is a dead-end, joyless way of life.
I appreciate that the men on this site have been willing to allow me to enter the ongoing discussions. You all are more gentlemanly than certain women would acknowledge.
November 21st, 2005 at 10:44 pm - IP Man-Hash: d754ab99d7c00
Thank you, Arielle. No, I do not know you, but I recall your post discussing the rise of feminism in the 60’s — and suggesting some male culpability in an eagerness to get sex. I’ve believed that myself, and so when I saw some similarly cogent posts from you — right or wrong, you have so far come across as both polite and cogent — I felt it appropriate to comment.
Dick can correct me if I am mistaken, but ladies (and women) are not allowed not because there is the desire to operate some form of boy’s club here, but because:
1. Most women will be irrationally offended and greatly troubled by many of the ideas expressed on this site;
2. Many women these days seem to believe that expressing themselves violently and abusively (at least on the net) is a “right” inherent to their gender.
3. (1 and 2) end up inhibiting a free and fair discussion of ideas.
4. (other reasons as well; not worth the time to enumerate them)
Few, if any, of us are so uncouth. The fact that we know “men are better than women” does not mean that we dislike women, or think they are terrible; far from it.
I must caution you, however, that you will find much that you may dislike, disagree with, or even not understand here. You will, however, likely find remarkable tolerance as long as you do not seek to argue nonsense, toss out irrelevancies, or simply chatter for the dubious pleasure of hearing your own inebriated words, unlike some.
“A good woman is as a rose to be treasured; verily.” Bb 5:19.
Best,
wolfe.
November 22nd, 2005 at 12:27 am - IP Man-Hash: 957564b4aff6d
I’ve already seen posts of Mr. Masterson’s which I do not entirely agree with. I don’t find it necessary to speak up every time I disagree with someone, though - especially as the reason I return here is to ‘hear’ things from a man’s perspective.
I would imagine that most of the men here would recognize a good woman if they met one and would treat her accordingly.
There’s also nothing wrong with the idea of a ‘boy’s club’. I think such establishments can actually be a very healthy outlet for men. There’s no need to feel threatened by a man’s desire to spend time with his peers - after all, most men still prefer to go home to a woman at the end of the day.
November 22nd, 2005 at 12:54 am - IP Man-Hash: dd25bee8154fe
The only reason they’re being nice to you sister is because I’ve done all the hard work for you and BROKEN THEM DOWN. They’ve become so fatigued with fighting with me that it’s become joyless and BORING. Ergo, they have adapted by now deciding to be nice to you. No need to thank me. If you don’t believe me, try reading all the posts to and from me over the last 2 months. Knock yourself out.
November 22nd, 2005 at 1:01 am - IP Man-Hash: dd25bee8154fe
Are you trying to wind me up? It’s either that or you are sensitive to the point of paranoia. Do I need to go to the forums and find the quote? I will if that is what is required here. For brevity’s sake, what I posted was along the lines of that you were keeping your gf in a ‘dumbed down’ position due to installing netnanny on your pc to protect her from coming across this site and your hateful comments to myself and other women on it. Watch out Arielle, they’re all a bunch of con-artists. They revel in it.
November 22nd, 2005 at 1:33 am - IP Man-Hash: ac62c77584632
Wind you up? You insane harpy, you’re wound tighter than a ferret at a Metallica concert. Now what was that about you paving the way for your “sister” Arielle?
Wait, I have a better idea. Why don’t you just fuck off of my site instead of answering. You foul, ugly thing.
-Dick
November 22nd, 2005 at 1:37 am - IP Man-Hash: dd25bee8154fe
Oh gee dick, that really hurts. Maybe I will fuck off, or maybe I won’t. Who knows what I will do, I’m a female, so it’s in my very nature to change my mind. So sorry, but I just can’t give you any guarantees.
November 22nd, 2005 at 2:29 am - IP Man-Hash: dd25bee8154fe
Excuse me, but I wasn’t drunk & besides if you weren’t getting something (whatever that might be) out of the conversation, why didn’t you simply log off and go and talk to your girlfriend?
“A good woman is as a rose to be treasured; verily.” Bb 5:19.
Best,
wolfe.
Thankyou, thankyou very much.
November 22nd, 2005 at 2:29 am - IP Man-Hash: dd25bee8154fe
Rats
November 22nd, 2005 at 5:20 am - IP Man-Hash: d754ab99d7c00
Long post, but I’m stuck waiting in the early morning for a response from the Far East (getting late for them). Managing a business relationship with roots in four time zones spanning roughly 19 hours of the globe is… painful. Enough introspection; the year’s quota has now been filled.
Indeed not. I merely wished to indicate my impression that Dick’s was more on functional and protective grounds, solely in my opinion of course. (I stress that: my views on the rationale for the ban on women are just that; my own views, not Dick’s).
Female, you objected to my characterization of someone’s words as inebriated. I find it interesting you assumed I was speaking of you. You object to that word, “inebriated”, on the grounds that you were high rather than drunk. Given the definition of the word:
I think “stupefied” describes your behavior that night. I’ve come to believe, viewing your recent posts, that it is describing your behavior in general.
You then objected to my characterization of your remarks about my girlfriend. Yes, I found this insulting to me and her:
Female, that was your quote. I found it objectionable then, and I find it even more so now. You imply I am abusing her; you imply I am preventing her from experiencing reality (rather than shielding her from things that aren’t germane to her that will upset her). You then assume things about her that you have no right to assume. She is a strong and intelligent woman; I am not abusing my experience or her, and the very idea that I would be able to keep her in a “perpetual dumbed down position” is laughable if you knew her (to say nothing of me) and insulting if you don’t. Protecting her from things I know, a priori, will bother her does not remotely equate to keeping her “dumbed down”.
If you had genuinely ever loved someone, you would know why your quotes were objectionable. You would also know why you raised Arielle’s hackles when you made an off-hand snide remark about her husband/fiance/bf [sorry, too lazy to check]. Given your description of past relationships and emphasis on “fucking” men, I doubt that love has entered the picture for you. I hope it will one day, before you die old, bitter, and alone.
Female, if you wish to genuinely rationally debate something that is on topic and relevant to these boards — I refer, as an example, to your comments on J.M. Barrie where you showed a spark of intellect — that’s fine. I will respond politely, and in kind. But if you wish to hurl invective, hit at our loved ones, and behave like an ignorant fool, then do not be surprised when you are treated as one.
The only reason they’re being nice to you sister [Arielle] is because I’ve done all the hard work for you and BROKEN THEM DOWN. They’ve become so fatigued with fighting with me that it’s become joyless and BORING. Ergo, they have adapted by now deciding to be nice to you. No need to thank me. If you don’t believe me, try reading all the posts to and from me over the last 2 months. Knock yourself out.
First, that is an excellent suggestion if Arielle has plenty of time to waste. Read the posts; judge for yourself. I can summarize my approach to Female:
1. Polite but intellectually cold when she swanned on to give us a lecture about global capitalism and the environment. She never responded to my cogent criticism of her babble. I was likely condescending, though actually intellectually helpful. But if you are going to spout notions that sound stupid even in the mouth of a 14 year old on these boards — and be a woman — then you will either be ignored by me or you will get a scathing response.
2. Polite in response to some attempts to be rational
3. Dismayed, colder in response to her assault on my girlfriend and me.
4. Polite in response to an attempt worthy of a first year student to critique J.M. Barrie’s views on gender, sex.
5. Very kind, and cautious (and urging others to be) when it became apparent she might be mentally ill. (That’s not a slur at her; I’ve a cousin who was quite ill; she was no less a human being for it)
6. After her denial of illness, repeated rudeness/insults/insanity/inanity and when it became apparent that her symptoms of illness were in fact those caused by using recreational pharmaceuticals, I became fairly dismissive. We had a ‘conversation’ over the weekend where she went all over the map; I responded to even her most egregious non-rational leaps [e.g. with suggested reading], but she was then off like a flash to another bizarre tangent of neurotic unreality.
7. Fairly cold to her subsequent to 1-6 and her rather disgusting discussion of her sex life/mores. No thanks.
Female can respond as to the accuracy of my summation. I have never cursed her, never used abusive language (certainly not initiated). My worst offenses have been to be cold and condescending. Unkind, yes, but considering she is violating the terms of service and spewing garbage, not unreasonable. If I were on an astrology or marijuana or heroin website (heaven forbid!) I would not say a word against Female’s endless posts.
I operate under both Christian and game-theory assumptions; attempt to apply the Golden Rule, and tit-for-tat game theory. Assume the best of your interlocutor, but prepare for the worst and respond accordingly.
I will treat Arielle with kindness, courtesy and restraint, provided she shows the same to others. It is possible I will behave in a manner towards her that a feminist would consider condescending. So be it. That is not my intent. I will respond with rationality provided she remains fixed on a rational plane. If she seeks to go off-topic, spew irrelevant trash, I will respond appropriately.
As long as any woman here (forbidden by terms of service, mind you!) advances a rational argument and responds to a rational criticism with either:
1. That’s a good idea; you have probably convinced me/I need to rethink;
2. That’s a good idea, but here’s why it’s wrong…
3. That’s a bad idea, here’s why . [very rare, but conceivable].
I will treat her with courtesy and respect, though I will not for a moment abandon the view that men are better than women. On this site, I remain open to any honest constructive criticism — even from women. To date, Female, you have had none.
If a woman is repeatedly abusive and nasty, then… well… she will get what she deserves, here and there.
-wolfe.
November 22nd, 2005 at 5:23 am - IP Man-Hash: d754ab99d7c00
Hmm, the comment system has mildly owned me. I note that, unlike Female’s pathetic attempts, neither meaning nor functionality is lost. Obviously in my mantastic attempt to quote from the forums in the same manner we can quote from the comment base, I left an unclosed tag. Sad.
-wolfe
November 22nd, 2005 at 7:41 am - IP Man-Hash: 957564b4aff6d
I’d imagine, Mr. Masterson, that she is either trying to wind me up, or sully my reputation by implying a (non-existent) sisterhood.
Given that she appears to be of the desperate, attention-seeking type, I try not to give too much of it to her.
November 22nd, 2005 at 3:19 pm - IP Man-Hash: 9efaeb2a8447e
Oh, I see you’ve decided to cross the floor Arielle. Good for you and good luck with that.
November 22nd, 2005 at 3:40 pm - IP Man-Hash: 9efaeb2a8447e
And sheesh *slaps forehead* get over the ’supposed’ gf criticism will you? How you can possibly be running an international business but be unable to move on from that seems somewhat incompatible.
November 22nd, 2005 at 3:58 pm - IP Man-Hash: 1cc2bd319db66
to be honest i don´t like sport that much, though i ocationally watch tennis. what about you guys?
My god the most boring sport i have ever seen is something called curling, that sport should seriously be banned.
Half-Soul
November 22nd, 2005 at 4:01 pm - IP Man-Hash: 9efaeb2a8447e
what is that HF? Yes I love tennis & Federer. Was up late the other night watching Nalbandian beat him. Maybe Roger has decided it’s time to start throwing a few matches and let the other saps actually win some of the tournament cash?
November 22nd, 2005 at 4:39 pm - IP Man-Hash: 1cc2bd319db66
Nalbandian beat Federer?! well it only shows, that he is human hehe.
man why do i always miss good programs, and when i finally get to see some t.v. there are either really nonsense programs on, or a good syncronized movie on a german channel.. though it has a comical value in itself to hear i.e. Eddie murphy “speak german”. so i mostly watch discovery and animal planet or i rent some movies, when i want to relax and just to get my mind away from everything-for a while.
Half-Soul
November 22nd, 2005 at 5:05 pm - IP Man-Hash: dd25bee8154fe
Australian Idol Series 3 has been on the air for the last 6 months so the only tv I’ve actually seen in the last 8 weeks was that tennis match and of course, watching Australia beat Uruguay in the Soccer. Truly magical penalty shoot-out. First time in 32 years that we will get to compete in World Cup, so some friends & I are planning a trip to Germany next year (how excitement!!!!). We only have 5 free to air channels here, or did, until a year or two ago when they introduced digital tv. This means there are now about 6 free to air channels (provided you have a set-top box/digital signal decoder) and the news one are supposed to be community/grass-roots channels. We pay for cable (digital foxtel) and I don’t know how many channels we have (too many) cause I don’t watch it. A few years ago I was seriously addicted to National Geographic, Discover y and I will always love Animal Planet. David Attenborough RoX0rS!!1!
November 22nd, 2005 at 6:06 pm -