<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Knight to Pawn Four.  Check and Bullshit.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-chess/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-chess/</link>
	<description>Are men better than women?   Yes.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alf Stewart</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-chess/comment-page-5/#comment-631208</link>
		<dc:creator>Alf Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 07:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050521/knight-to-pawn-four-check-and-bullshit/#comment-631208</guid>
		<description>&quot;A man should not depend on a wimmin for anything.As for as possible
avoid depending on the wimmin except the basics.

Depending on a wimmin makes a man vulnerable to wimmin’s manipulation &amp; control……&quot;

You discredit the male argument by articulating it like a bitchy fuckwit.

Sean Connery would punch you right in the face if he heard you menstruating out of your mouth like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A man should not depend on a wimmin for anything.As for as possible<br />
avoid depending on the wimmin except the basics.</p>
<p>Depending on a wimmin makes a man vulnerable to wimmin’s manipulation &amp; control……&#8221;</p>
<p>You discredit the male argument by articulating it like a bitchy fuckwit.</p>
<p>Sean Connery would punch you right in the face if he heard you menstruating out of your mouth like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kick the bitch ass</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-chess/comment-page-5/#comment-570487</link>
		<dc:creator>kick the bitch ass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 18:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050521/knight-to-pawn-four-check-and-bullshit/#comment-570487</guid>
		<description>A man should not depend on a wimmin for anything.As for as possible
avoid depending on the wimmin except the basics.

Depending on a wimmin makes a man vulnerable to wimmin’s manipulation &amp; control………

gives a wimmin enough room to manipulate &amp; control a man to her advantage.

So guys………………

BOTTOMLINE………..except for sex, babies &amp; making sammiches don’t
depend on a wimmin for anything else….if you want mental peace &amp;
sanity.

MOOT POINT: Never depend on wimmin to bring home the bacon…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A man should not depend on a wimmin for anything.As for as possible<br />
avoid depending on the wimmin except the basics.</p>
<p>Depending on a wimmin makes a man vulnerable to wimmin’s manipulation &amp; control………</p>
<p>gives a wimmin enough room to manipulate &amp; control a man to her advantage.</p>
<p>So guys………………</p>
<p>BOTTOMLINE………..except for sex, babies &amp; making sammiches don’t<br />
depend on a wimmin for anything else….if you want mental peace &amp;<br />
sanity.</p>
<p>MOOT POINT: Never depend on wimmin to bring home the bacon…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nobody</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-chess/comment-page-5/#comment-562116</link>
		<dc:creator>nobody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 09:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050521/knight-to-pawn-four-check-and-bullshit/#comment-562116</guid>
		<description>Yeah I used to have this never-winning problem with chess, despite my iq of 140, but then i figured out the solution. I only play correspondence chess now. I don&#039;t make a move when I&#039;m angry at my opponents last move or when I&#039;m feeling particularly intimidated by a pawn or something. 
Gotta admit that fast thinking is not my thing tho :p Matter of fact, I don&#039;t even like to. Got my boyfriend for that =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I used to have this never-winning problem with chess, despite my iq of 140, but then i figured out the solution. I only play correspondence chess now. I don&#8217;t make a move when I&#8217;m angry at my opponents last move or when I&#8217;m feeling particularly intimidated by a pawn or something.<br />
Gotta admit that fast thinking is not my thing tho :p Matter of fact, I don&#8217;t even like to. Got my boyfriend for that =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-chess/comment-page-5/#comment-559206</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050521/knight-to-pawn-four-check-and-bullshit/#comment-559206</guid>
		<description>As my friend Tom Leykis put it...there is always an exception to the rule. Props to her though for practicing billiards rather than cocksucking she gets my respect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As my friend Tom Leykis put it&#8230;there is always an exception to the rule. Props to her though for practicing billiards rather than cocksucking she gets my respect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haha89</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-chess/comment-page-5/#comment-517040</link>
		<dc:creator>Haha89</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 23:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050521/knight-to-pawn-four-check-and-bullshit/#comment-517040</guid>
		<description>www.maleenhancement.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.maleenhancement.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.maleenhancement.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hugh hillton</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-chess/comment-page-5/#comment-496856</link>
		<dc:creator>hugh hillton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 09:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050521/knight-to-pawn-four-check-and-bullshit/#comment-496856</guid>
		<description>Women’s leagues of anything are like midgets following men around dressed up exactly like them. They look the same, but come on. What are you serious here?

LOL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Women’s leagues of anything are like midgets following men around dressed up exactly like them. They look the same, but come on. What are you serious here?</p>
<p>LOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-chess/comment-page-5/#comment-341025</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 20:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050521/knight-to-pawn-four-check-and-bullshit/#comment-341025</guid>
		<description>Only stupid people love and respect women.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only stupid people love and respect women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-chess/comment-page-5/#comment-341022</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 20:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050521/knight-to-pawn-four-check-and-bullshit/#comment-341022</guid>
		<description>All men of high intelligence are of necessity chauvinists. Most of the greatest geniuses who ever lived were chauvinists. There seems to be a positive correlation between male chauvinism and high intelligence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All men of high intelligence are of necessity chauvinists. Most of the greatest geniuses who ever lived were chauvinists. There seems to be a positive correlation between male chauvinism and high intelligence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Le'Mat</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-chess/comment-page-5/#comment-340907</link>
		<dc:creator>Le'Mat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 19:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050521/knight-to-pawn-four-check-and-bullshit/#comment-340907</guid>
		<description>Considering your still alive in a civilization we carved out of the fucking stone age, I&#039;d say you&#039;re wrong.  Fuck off, I&#039;ve gotta go to work... something you obviously no NOTHING about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering your still alive in a civilization we carved out of the fucking stone age, I&#8217;d say you&#8217;re wrong.  Fuck off, I&#8217;ve gotta go to work&#8230; something you obviously no NOTHING about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liviaanaa</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-chess/comment-page-5/#comment-340894</link>
		<dc:creator>Liviaanaa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 18:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050521/knight-to-pawn-four-check-and-bullshit/#comment-340894</guid>
		<description>The fact that your brain is larger may account for man&#039;s ego, not his intelligence. If he was intelligent he wouldn&#039;t soak up natural resources. Man does not know how to survive. But you have stressed that point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that your brain is larger may account for man&#8217;s ego, not his intelligence. If he was intelligent he wouldn&#8217;t soak up natural resources. Man does not know how to survive. But you have stressed that point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: misery</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-chess/comment-page-4/#comment-287921</link>
		<dc:creator>misery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 07:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050521/knight-to-pawn-four-check-and-bullshit/#comment-287921</guid>
		<description>Agreed. I just call them all &#039;girls&#039;, until I see actual proof with my own eyes that they&#039;ve grown up.

No need to make up stupid words. English is complicated enough, and I bet you can guess who&#039;s fault that is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. I just call them all &#8216;girls&#8217;, until I see actual proof with my own eyes that they&#8217;ve grown up.</p>
<p>No need to make up stupid words. English is complicated enough, and I bet you can guess who&#8217;s fault that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manos</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-chess/comment-page-5/#comment-231087</link>
		<dc:creator>manos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 14:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050521/knight-to-pawn-four-check-and-bullshit/#comment-231087</guid>
		<description>HAHA I agree wholeheartedly with you, dick. And, I also call an exception to this rule... there is one woman in sports that, in her field, she&#039;d destroy any man she played against, and that&#039;s Jeanette Lee, Billiards champion and master of more trick shots than george bush at a 9/11 press conference. This is no ordinary woman, at least on the pool table. Deemed &quot;The Black Widow&quot;, she&#039;s got seriuos skill that would rival or beat any man in the sport, hands down. She&#039;s not always champion either, which is another testiment to her greatness. Any great pool player knows the real money is in the green room, away from the cameras, and being champion all but shuts that door for you. Watchin her play other women is like watching a cat play with a one-legged mouse. She is very skilled, and at least as skilled as any man in the sport. Period. HOWEVER, she is a freak of nature, and an exception to the rule. Why? Because she has genuine confidence, discipline, logic, and intelligence. Three qualities that women are not equipped with, and unfortunately can&#039;t be found on the shelves at the local Hecht&#039;s. Which makes Mrs. Lee MY honourary man of the century.
AND! she&#039;s hot too.
~Manos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAHA I agree wholeheartedly with you, dick. And, I also call an exception to this rule&#8230; there is one woman in sports that, in her field, she&#8217;d destroy any man she played against, and that&#8217;s Jeanette Lee, Billiards champion and master of more trick shots than george bush at a 9/11 press conference. This is no ordinary woman, at least on the pool table. Deemed &#8220;The Black Widow&#8221;, she&#8217;s got seriuos skill that would rival or beat any man in the sport, hands down. She&#8217;s not always champion either, which is another testiment to her greatness. Any great pool player knows the real money is in the green room, away from the cameras, and being champion all but shuts that door for you. Watchin her play other women is like watching a cat play with a one-legged mouse. She is very skilled, and at least as skilled as any man in the sport. Period. HOWEVER, she is a freak of nature, and an exception to the rule. Why? Because she has genuine confidence, discipline, logic, and intelligence. Three qualities that women are not equipped with, and unfortunately can&#8217;t be found on the shelves at the local Hecht&#8217;s. Which makes Mrs. Lee MY honourary man of the century.<br />
AND! she&#8217;s hot too.<br />
~Manos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-chess/comment-page-5/#comment-207252</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 06:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050521/knight-to-pawn-four-check-and-bullshit/#comment-207252</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-77618&quot; title=&quot;View the original comment&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Tribble said:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

I&#039;m coming into this conversation about 2 years late, however I do want to say that both parties here are off. The men start out by straight insulting women&#039;s abilities, not at chess, but at everything. Yes men are physically stronger, and yes, men are usually better chess players. Being an avid chess player myself, I&#039;d say one of the main reasons for that though is simply........ you never see women playing chess........ I&#039;ve seen women beat men at chess and visa versa but all in all like women mentioning men and cooking they just don&#039;t give a damn so they don&#039;t get good at it. However, you women come in and try to defend yourself against the men by doing the exact same god damn thing they&#039;re doing and insulting them for it! Coming in and insulting men because they&#039;re insulting women. It&#039;s pretty sad to read this bullshit from both parties. Learn this one simple fact: It ALWAYS depends on the person. Not to mention I think the majority of us are supposed to be chess players in here meaning, in all reality, we should be some pretty bright people. But so far based on the comments I&#039;ve read......... I&#039;m pretty sure I can beat all of you at chess. Man or woman.

...........by the way in case you are wondering I am a male.



Grow the fuck up all of you

and yes I do like adding &quot;......&quot; when it&#039;s not really necessary.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

emerald beats the shit outta rachael ray or any other female chef&#039;s...
Men ARE better cooks, and chefs, than women.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-77618" title="View the original comment"><em>Tribble said:</em></a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m coming into this conversation about 2 years late, however I do want to say that both parties here are off. The men start out by straight insulting women&#8217;s abilities, not at chess, but at everything. Yes men are physically stronger, and yes, men are usually better chess players. Being an avid chess player myself, I&#8217;d say one of the main reasons for that though is simply&#8230;&#8230;.. you never see women playing chess&#8230;&#8230;.. I&#8217;ve seen women beat men at chess and visa versa but all in all like women mentioning men and cooking they just don&#8217;t give a damn so they don&#8217;t get good at it. However, you women come in and try to defend yourself against the men by doing the exact same god damn thing they&#8217;re doing and insulting them for it! Coming in and insulting men because they&#8217;re insulting women. It&#8217;s pretty sad to read this bullshit from both parties. Learn this one simple fact: It ALWAYS depends on the person. Not to mention I think the majority of us are supposed to be chess players in here meaning, in all reality, we should be some pretty bright people. But so far based on the comments I&#8217;ve read&#8230;&#8230;&#8230; I&#8217;m pretty sure I can beat all of you at chess. Man or woman.</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..by the way in case you are wondering I am a male.</p>
<p>Grow the fuck up all of you</p>
<p>and yes I do like adding &#8220;&#8230;&#8230;&#8221; when it&#8217;s not really necessary.</p></blockquote>
<p>emerald beats the shit outta rachael ray or any other female chef&#8217;s&#8230;<br />
Men ARE better cooks, and chefs, than women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-chess/comment-page-4/#comment-207250</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 06:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050521/knight-to-pawn-four-check-and-bullshit/#comment-207250</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-4445&quot; title=&quot;View the original comment&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Geeza said:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

If you really want to get into a pointless argument, go talk to some other women.

What is it with women and their love of pointless arguments.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

unlike women, men have a need to make sense...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-4445" title="View the original comment"><em>Geeza said:</em></a></p>
<p>If you really want to get into a pointless argument, go talk to some other women.</p>
<p>What is it with women and their love of pointless arguments.</p></blockquote>
<p>unlike women, men have a need to make sense&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wolfe</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-chess/comment-page-4/#comment-77652</link>
		<dc:creator>wolfe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050521/knight-to-pawn-four-check-and-bullshit/#comment-77652</guid>
		<description>@doubt, and gentlemen: Tribble&#039;s post is unexceptional, s/he seems confused between logic and insult. I think therefore Tribble is fundamentally in error, but fair enough. However, the statement &quot;by the way in case you are wondering I am a male.&quot; has some serious consequences.

I quote &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/forums/about34.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Law 6 of the Laws of Women&lt;/a&gt;:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Big Al&#039;s Observation: Internet statements such as &quot;I am a man&quot; almost invariably mean the writer is female. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

-wolfe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@doubt, and gentlemen: Tribble&#8217;s post is unexceptional, s/he seems confused between logic and insult. I think therefore Tribble is fundamentally in error, but fair enough. However, the statement &#8220;by the way in case you are wondering I am a male.&#8221; has some serious consequences.</p>
<p>I quote <a href="http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/forums/about34.html" rel="nofollow">Law 6 of the Laws of Women</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Big Al&#8217;s Observation: Internet statements such as &#8220;I am a man&#8221; almost invariably mean the writer is female. </p></blockquote>
<p>-wolfe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doubt</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-chess/comment-page-4/#comment-77648</link>
		<dc:creator>Doubt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050521/knight-to-pawn-four-check-and-bullshit/#comment-77648</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
...........by the way in case you are wondering I am a male.



Grow the fuck up all of you

and yes I do like adding &quot;......&quot; when it&#039;s not really necessary.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That insult really gets your point across. I just love having my intelligence insulted by someone who thinks s/he&#039;s superior to me, especially when they just burst right out somewhere like a girl on a football team. Great job there, man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..by the way in case you are wondering I am a male.</p>
<p>Grow the fuck up all of you</p>
<p>and yes I do like adding &#8220;&#8230;&#8230;&#8221; when it&#8217;s not really necessary.</p></blockquote>
<p>That insult really gets your point across. I just love having my intelligence insulted by someone who thinks s/he&#8217;s superior to me, especially when they just burst right out somewhere like a girl on a football team. Great job there, man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonyad</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-chess/comment-page-4/#comment-77622</link>
		<dc:creator>sonyad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 08:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050521/knight-to-pawn-four-check-and-bullshit/#comment-77622</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see any women driving either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see any women driving either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tribble</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-chess/comment-page-4/#comment-77618</link>
		<dc:creator>Tribble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 08:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050521/knight-to-pawn-four-check-and-bullshit/#comment-77618</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m coming into this conversation about 2 years late, however I do want to say that both parties here are off. The men start out by straight insulting women&#039;s abilities, not at chess, but at everything. Yes men are physically stronger, and yes, men are usually better chess players. Being an avid chess player myself, I&#039;d say one of the main reasons for that though is simply........ you never see women playing chess........ I&#039;ve seen women beat men at chess and visa versa but all in all like women mentioning men and cooking they just don&#039;t give a damn so they don&#039;t get good at it. However, you women come in and try to defend yourself against the men by doing the exact same god damn thing they&#039;re doing and insulting them for it! Coming in and insulting men because they&#039;re insulting women. It&#039;s pretty sad to read this bullshit from both parties. Learn this one simple fact: It ALWAYS depends on the person. Not to mention I think the majority of us are supposed to be chess players in here meaning, in all reality, we should be some pretty bright people. But so far based on the comments I&#039;ve read......... I&#039;m pretty sure I can beat all of you at chess. Man or woman.

...........by the way in case you are wondering I am a male.



Grow the fuck up all of you

and yes I do like adding &quot;......&quot; when it&#039;s not really necessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m coming into this conversation about 2 years late, however I do want to say that both parties here are off. The men start out by straight insulting women&#8217;s abilities, not at chess, but at everything. Yes men are physically stronger, and yes, men are usually better chess players. Being an avid chess player myself, I&#8217;d say one of the main reasons for that though is simply&#8230;&#8230;.. you never see women playing chess&#8230;&#8230;.. I&#8217;ve seen women beat men at chess and visa versa but all in all like women mentioning men and cooking they just don&#8217;t give a damn so they don&#8217;t get good at it. However, you women come in and try to defend yourself against the men by doing the exact same god damn thing they&#8217;re doing and insulting them for it! Coming in and insulting men because they&#8217;re insulting women. It&#8217;s pretty sad to read this bullshit from both parties. Learn this one simple fact: It ALWAYS depends on the person. Not to mention I think the majority of us are supposed to be chess players in here meaning, in all reality, we should be some pretty bright people. But so far based on the comments I&#8217;ve read&#8230;&#8230;&#8230; I&#8217;m pretty sure I can beat all of you at chess. Man or woman.</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..by the way in case you are wondering I am a male.</p>
<p>Grow the fuck up all of you</p>
<p>and yes I do like adding &#8220;&#8230;&#8230;&#8221; when it&#8217;s not really necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e v i l e d d y</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-chess/comment-page-4/#comment-68874</link>
		<dc:creator>e v i l e d d y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 19:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050521/knight-to-pawn-four-check-and-bullshit/#comment-68874</guid>
		<description>There should be ZERO words from women at all here.

This is for men only.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There should be ZERO words from women at all here.</p>
<p>This is for men only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MansVoice</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-chess/comment-page-4/#comment-68861</link>
		<dc:creator>MansVoice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 18:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050521/knight-to-pawn-four-check-and-bullshit/#comment-68861</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-4706&quot; title=&quot;View the original comment&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Dick Masterson said:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Ah.  Maybe I can clear it up.  Redtygrr, or whatever her name was, was posting dozens of links with no explanation.  Then, when I deleted them because they add no value and waste everyone&#039;s time, she copied and pasted enormous chunks of text into the comment box.

By changing her name, she sought to outsmart the spam filter.  She, however, did not.  It was only until she cleaned up her act that her posts got through.

-Dick&lt;/blockquote&gt;

women always want the last word though in this forum, it wont be given to them. heh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="#comment-4706" title="View the original comment" rel="nofollow"><em>Dick Masterson said:</em></a></p>
<p>Ah.  Maybe I can clear it up.  Redtygrr, or whatever her name was, was posting dozens of links with no explanation.  Then, when I deleted them because they add no value and waste everyone&#8217;s time, she copied and pasted enormous chunks of text into the comment box.</p>
<p>By changing her name, she sought to outsmart the spam filter.  She, however, did not.  It was only until she cleaned up her act that her posts got through.</p>
<p>-Dick</p></blockquote>
<p>women always want the last word though in this forum, it wont be given to them. heh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

