Women suck at computers
Computers are all over the place: the bank, the sciences, the workplace — in other words, places where women are not. Is this a coincidence? You bet your ass that no it isn’t.
Women face countless problems in their pipe-dream of equality. The biggest being that the whole notion is childish and only realistic to an insane person or someone who has never had a job.
Women also suck at computers.
It’s the same way that men suck at being happy when their best friend gets dumped and then has to rely on them for emotional support. That just doesn’t make the kind of sense to us.
Computers are that way for women.
You see, women don’t understand computers because they don’t understand the basics of cause and effect — that the one causes the other. It’s childlike in its simplicity, I know, but it’s absolutely true.
This backwards mentality applies to computers just as easily as it applies to every other aspect of a woman’s life, which she is right about to hopelessly fuck up yet again by doing the exact same thing and expecting it somehow to magically work this time.
I saw this in action just yesterday while waiting in line for an ATM at the bank. For some absurd reason, a woman had been put in charge of her own finances and had promptly lost her ATM card in the machine. She started frantically pressing buttons, expecting that at any moment something profoundly contrary to what had happened was about to happen. Guess what. It didn’t.
What I’m saying here is that men are better than women because every time a man drops a rock in to a ditch, he knows it’s going to fall. Women think that if they do it enough, it will turn into a Snicker’s bar.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 31 … 14 13 12 11 10 [9] 8 7 6 5 4 … 1 » Show All
I’m beginning to believe women should not be allowed to teach boys beyond a particular age. Regardless of the rightness of it most women are physically intimidated by them.
Teenage boys are discovering they possess these magnificent machines in their own bodies and minds that are getting bigger, faster, stronger every day. Everything is new and exciting. Some of them experience immense joy from physical movement and debate as a consequence. Their expression of this can get them into trouble particularly from women who feel physically threatened by it and use their authority to block it completely. IT DOESN’T NEED TO BE STOPPED. IT NEEDS TO BE DIRECTED.
Unfortunately most women simply do not understand or empathise with it. They go as far as pathologising it as though there is something somehow wrong with it.
So how many boys are on Ritalin?
More importantly what proportion of those boys would otherwise be destined to be among the elite if not drugged into a stupor or constantly being shamed(By a woman! In front of ones peers!) during the most important phase of their life?
Just how much of our future creativity and innovation are we prepared to sacrifice to achieve some illusory and constantly altering concept of parity between the genders.
Clean a deer?! This reminds me one time (not at band camp) when I held a dead cow’s leg as it was skinned. The fascination overrode my abhorrence. I know this is waaay off topic. Deal with it vegies.
Speaking of horrific teaching practices, I hardly think any man here can complain that teachers are teaching male students anywhere near the rot that women were taught in the 50’s.
For your perusal, here is an extract from a Home Economics textbook of the early 1950’s entitled The Good Wife Guide. The part up to [*] is supposed to have appeared in Housekeeping Monthly dated 13 May 1955 under the heading ‘The Good Wife’s Guide.’
http://www.heretical.com/miscellx/sexppf.html
Virtually every country has far more female teachers (prior to university) than male for two reasons.
1. Mildly intelligent female labor is cheaper than mildly intelligent male labor (no, not because of sexist discrimination, but because women are much more prone to take time out from the labor force and/or work part-time).
2. There’s a view (almost certainly at least partly wrong) that men are much more likely to molest children than women. People see a man who’s interested in helping out kids as a potential pedophile, and a woman who’s interested in the same as “normal”. This makes most men eager to ’select out’ of being teachers.
Where it has all gone wrong, in my view, is a) public-sector unions, and b) the supervisory management and teaching staff previously were male, and could at least explain to female teachers why boys behaved as they did, and c) zero tolerance (for which the left and right bear equal shame).
It seems intelligent to do this. Educate your children in sex-segregated fashion. That said, teach your daughters to shoot, hunt, change a lightbulb or oil, clean a deer, the differential and integral calculus, navigate the high seas by 19th century technology, quantum physics, at least one foreign language, the glory of literature, as well as how to cook, sew, sing, and play a musical instrument. Teach your sons in the same fields, though expect them to gravitate differently.
-wolfe
And it really figures.
Right. So what you’re suggesting is that women are oppressing men and keeping them out of the schools by force and that what you see as being inevitable is a mass u[rising of men suddenly throwing in their jobs and flocking to colleges to get re-educated as a teacher, after which they will then march en masse towards schools, hoist the female teachers of their jobs and commence teaching happily on a civil servants salary? Is that your big revolutionary fantasy? Someone obviously forgot to tell you that men are more selfish than women and they aren’t going to want to take that pay-cut. Sorry, but yah, women aren’t to blame. Not going to play your little stupid game.
Habitual liar you are!
No one asked you to play anything and in fact you have been asked to leave on many ocassions. But you’re too stupid and like to hang out where you’re unwanted. Don’t try to put guess what I think. Dipshit.
Because you misssed it time and time again… Let me spell it out for you… Fuk off this planet
diamatik, India has more female than male teachers. Especially at the primary/middle/high school level.
The study’s interesting, you can find a pdf copy here: (http://www.educationnext.org/20064/ednext20064_68.pdf). I skimmed through it earlier.
It’s worth noting that some of his results are below statistical significance thresholds. I’d characterize it as a persuasive, but hardly conclusive analysis. It also has the feel of being much closer to a well-[peer-]reviewed article than a scientific paper.
Great find nevertheless gwallan. I think the author’s probably quite right.
-wolfe
Maximum masculine kudos to you, gwallan, for that find. I am going to see if I can get a copy of that study so that next time there is bitching about boys’ underachievement I can say that women teachers are ruining boys’ futures. I wonder if places like India have more male teachers than female?
Do all women have ISBN 22 stamped on thier forehead?
No I don’t, I outscored thousands upon thousands of men in my Vocational Education Training IT course last year…I was in the top 2%. If I truly sucked I wouldn’t have that kind of score.
Anyway, I wouldn’t date the top guy if you paid me. He’s probably into Doctor WHO and spends his day in his basement doing things girls prefer not to think guys do.
Just had a brainwave: maybe websites that bag out feminism is the new way to compensate for tiny penises! Hey!
For your consumption.
Study: Teacher’s gender affects learning
Jolly good; pip-pip as the British a few generations ago would have said.
@Female: “men are more selfish than women”. I don’t think that is the case. Certainly it is antithetical to the way men have traditionally been socialized. I would tend to agree, though, that possibly in their natural state, men may well be more selfish than women. Maybe. That suggests feminism’s destruction of traditional gender socialization has been inordinately destructive to women.
The thing is, what makes a man is not just the way he’s born, but the way he’s raised. That’s vital. And I sincerely think that’s a point most feminists — especially gender feminists — miss utterly.
Since you’re a fellow South Park fan, I know you’ll grasp contrasting the Birkenhead drill with “Shake your t-tt–s when you vote, b—-.”
I suspect the latter approach came from a female-headed household. The former definitely didn’t, and is the antithesis of selfishness.
-wolfe
Right. So what you’re suggesting is that women are oppressing men and keeping them out of the schools by force and that what you see as being inevitable is a mass u[rising of men suddenly throwing in their jobs and flocking to colleges to get re-educated as a teacher, after which they will then march en masse towards schools, hoist the female teachers of their jobs and commence teaching happily on a civil servants salary? Is that your big revolutionary fantasy? Someone obviously forgot to tell you that men are more selfish than women and they aren’t going to want to take that pay-cut. Sorry, but yah, women aren’t to blame. Not going to play your little stupid game.
the feminist use children as shields for their agenda. We all know it’s jsut part of women lies and manipulation. The titanic went down carrying mostly men a children to the depths of the cold waters. Twice as many women survived as did children.
When it comes down to it women ae only concerned with their own fat asses. Now female take your narcistic ass away from here.
SoS is right and since the government has sponsored the feminist facade it will take a revolution to take back the western world. Women have no reason to teach boys. They have done a poor job teaching the girls how to be Ladylike.
Why Female. I didn’t expect such ludicrousness of you.
They only hold their meetings there.
Female you are one stupid cunt.
The hallmark of your gender is deception, betrayal, mischief. You really think they’re above fraud just because your pathetic movement put wings on a fish and called it a teacher?
Here’s the real story. Women suck at teaching and conveying information just as much as they suck at not fucking their students, or gourging themselves on breakfast pastries.
The young men of this generation are already seeing the lies we have been fed. The feminist traitors will soon be rounded up, decimated, destroyed, and defeated… Or it will be civil war without end.
Hows a field trip to Mecca sound, Female?
If the answers are the same, yet you say boys are receiving lower marks than girls, and you do not attribute this to their intelligence, or lack of it, then what you are suggesting is that teachers are deliberately engaging in fraud and marking male students down incorrectly. I find that highly unlikely and evidence of an absurd and paranoid imagination. I mean, really, do you also believe that feminists live underneath children’s beds?
This is exactly what former President Summers of Harvard University said in Jan-2005 … and was, of course, roundly criticized for his remarks by the liberal-feminazi intelligentsia (http://badgerherald.com/news/2005/02/09/harvard_president_ra.php). He was the kid on the side of the road in the story of the emperor with no clothes; he was pointing out that young women were shunning the ‘hard’ sciences in freshman college courses, like math and physics, and this in spite of 30 years of innumerable measures to encourage and facilitate the entry of women into the engineering and science faculties.
I agree with Harvard’s Prez on this, but the thing that makes me scratch my head is the fact that the highest marks in any high school’s graduating class go to the girls, not the boys. Indeed, it’s particularly perplexing when girls score highest in the maths and sciences in high school. My youngest son graduated from the 12th grade in June, and this is exactly what I saw when the kids marched up to the podium, one by one, to collect their diplomas: girls at the top, marks-wise.
What I suspect, however, is this: the girls are getting a break. Teachers (most of whom are women themselves) likely are marking the girls easier and being tougher on boys — even when the answers are the same. But more significantly, the school system today is set up to favor girls, not boys. It’s a well known fact that teenage boys in high school fail their courses — and tend to drop out — at a far higher rate than girls. And many secondary school educators are admitting that we are doing an abysmal job in helping teenage boys deal with both academic and peer pressures in high school, compared to teenage girls.
Thanks to feminism, and the thousands of different ways American society is now “equalizing” the supposed educational and economic gaps between men and women, we are now short-changing teenage boys. Young men are slowly being sentenced into lives of quiet destitution, while young women are essentially being served life on a silver platter. God help us a generation from now when these chickens come home to roost.