<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Women suck at computers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-computers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-computers/</link>
	<description>Are men better than women?   Yes.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 04:02:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Watcher.</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-computers/comment-page-21/#comment-558797</link>
		<dc:creator>Watcher.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050512/women-suck-at-computers/#comment-558797</guid>
		<description>The reason it makes no sense to you is EXACTLY the same reason why men are better with computers than women.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason it makes no sense to you is EXACTLY the same reason why men are better with computers than women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: explosive restraint</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-computers/comment-page-21/#comment-558608</link>
		<dc:creator>explosive restraint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050512/women-suck-at-computers/#comment-558608</guid>
		<description>This makes no sense to me.  Why would men be better at computers unless it is because they are able to use their penises as an eleventh finger while typing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This makes no sense to me.  Why would men be better at computers unless it is because they are able to use their penises as an eleventh finger while typing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-computers/comment-page-21/#comment-555583</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 04:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050512/women-suck-at-computers/#comment-555583</guid>
		<description>Couple of points which I would like to add..........to what Studioline has
said so far.......................

1. MAKE A WIMMIN DEPEND ON YOU FAR MORE...........THEN YOU GET
TO DEPEND ON WIMMIN..................

THAT MEANS YOU HAVE TO DRILL THE SIMPLE NOTION INTO BITCH&#039;S
HEAD THAT WHILE YOU ARE INDISPENSABLE TO HER...........FOR YOU
SHE IS PERFECTLY DISPENSABLE...........THAT MEANS YOU ARE FAR
MORE WORTHY TO HER...........THEN SHE IS TO YOU...........

IN SIMPLE TERMS IT MEANS SHE STANDS TO LOSE FAR MORE FROM
THE RELATIONSHIP IF IT BREAKS DOWN THEN YOU STAND TO LOSE
&amp; THE WIMMIN GAINS FAR MORE FROM THE RELATIONSHIP THEN YOU
GAIN FROM IT.

THIS HAS TO BE UNDERSTOOD IN PROPER CONTEXT...............

YOU DON&#039;T MAKE YOURSELF INDISPENSABLE TO HER BY SENDING
HER UNENDING STREAM OF BOUQUETS, BOOKING MOVIES &amp;
RESTAURANTS,GOING ON SHOPPING &amp; WORLD TOUR WITH HER &amp;
CATERING TO ALL THE UNNECESSARY WANTS,DESIRES OF BITCH WIMMIN &amp; NEITHER YOU MAKE YOURSELF INDISPENSABLE BY 
MARRYING A HIGH SALARIED BITCH &amp; PLAYING THE ROLE OF MALE
HOUSEWIFE BY INVOLVING YOURSELF IN HOUSEHOLD CHORES &amp;
RUNNING TO SUPERMARKETS ON GROCERY ERRANDS...........


YOU MAKE YOURSELF INDISPENSABLE BY PLAYING THE ROLE OF
HUNTER GATHERER &amp; PROTECTOR..................CALL IT ALPHA MALE,
EGOCENTRIC MALE, CHAUVINIST MALE........OR WHATEVER NAME
FOR THAT MATTER...................THE TRADITIONAL MALE ROLE WHICH
MEN HAVE PLAYED FOR EONS...............

FACE IT GUYS &amp; WRITE IT IN GOLDEN WORDS SOMEWHERE............A WIMMIN LOVES A MAN WHO PLAYS THE ROLE OF LEADER. A MAN WHO
PLAYS THE ROLE OF CAPTAIN &amp; STEERS THE BOAT OR SHIP.........

HOWEVER HARD THE FEMINIST BRAINWASHED PIG BITCHES MIGHT
TRY TO CONVINCE YOU, DETRACT YOU................THE GOLDEN TRUTH

IS NO...NO.. WIMMIN RESPECTS/SHOWS REGARD/FEARS A MAN WHO 
ABDICATES/ABSCONDS THE ROLE OF LEADERSHIP &amp; HANDS IT TO 
A WIMMIN.

FACE IT GUYS................THE MAN COMMANDS RESPECT ONLY WHEN
HE ASSUMES/PLAYS THE ROLE OF BOSS. IF THE FEMINIST BITCH
HARPS ON EQUALITY SHIT...........MUTUAL RESPECT &amp; OTHER CRAP
CRAP.........BLAH BLAH..........SHE IS OPENLY LYING............THE 
TRUTH IS SHE WANTS TO TAKE CONTROL OF YOU &amp; BECOME YOUR
BOSS.................THAT IS THE TRUTH GUYS............


THE FACT IS YOU COMMAND RESPECT..............YOU DON&#039;T DEMAND
IT &amp; IT IS NOT HANDED OVER TO YOU BECOZ YOU WANT IT.

{{FUNNY HOW MANY FEMINIST PIG WIMMIN COME OVER HERE &amp; PUT IT AS A 
MATTER OF FACT THAT MAN = WIMMIN ,SO MUTUAL RESPECT........
SO MAN SHOULD RESPECT WIMMIN &amp; WIMMIN RESPECTS MAN &amp; BLAH, BLAH, BLAH................FUCKING BS.}}

TO COMMAND RESPECT.........YOU HAVE TO PROVE YOURSELF FAR MORE WORTHY TO A BITCH...........THEN SHE IS TO YOU........

TELL THAT FUCKING BITCH.........EVEN THOUGH YOU ARE INVOLVED
IN A REGULAR JOB, YOU HOPE TO SEE YOURSELF AS PRESIDENT OF
COMPANY 10-20 YEARS DOWN THE LINE OR EVEN IF YOU DON&#039;T SEEM TO BE HEADING ANYWHERE 10 YEARS DOWN........SAY YOU MIGHT 
START YOUR OWN BUSINESS/COMPANY &amp; BECOME ITS CEO........

WIMMIN LIKE MEN WHO ARE AMBITIOUS OR AT LEAST HAVE A LONG
TERM PLAN...........

ALSO KEEP YOURSELF PHYSICALLY ACTIVE &amp; FIT BY GOING TO GYMN SO THAT THE STUPID BITCH FEELS SHE IS HAVING A BODYGUARD TO
PROTECT HER.........

2. MAKE A WIMMIN NEED YOU MORE THEN YOU ACTUALLY NEED HER...

TRY TO FULFILL A WIMMIN&#039;S NEEDS/WANTS WHICH ARE LEGITIMATE
&amp; RATIONAL BUT ON ONE CONDITION...........THE BITCH HAS TO WORK &amp; EARN FOR IT IN A PROPER MANNER/WAY.

TO EARN IT, THE WIMMIN SHOULD FIRST TRY TO FULFILL THE NEEDS/WANTS/WHATEVER TASKS A MAN ASSIGNS TO HER.

IF A WIMMIN SEEKS TRUE LOVE/AFFECTION OR SEXUAL GRATIFICATION, SHE SHOULD BE TOLD TO EARN IT THE HARD WAY.

IN SEX A WIMMIN HAS NO RIGHT TO ASK THE MAN TO SATISFY HER.
............{{UNLESS THE WIMMIN HAPPENS TO BE A PORN STAR CAPABLE OF PYROTECHNICS)............THE BITCH USUALLY LIES ON
THE BED LIKE A DEAD LOG &amp; THE MAN HAS TO PUT IN ALL THE 
PASSION &amp; EFFORT TO AROUSE HER &amp; KEEP THE SEXUAL ACT GOING
...................THE CONTRIBUTION OF BITCH IN THE ACT IS USUALLY NIL.........SO THE FUCKING BITCH HAS NO RIGHT TO ASK THE MAN
TO KEEP GOING &amp; SATISFY HER UNTIL &amp; UNLESS THE BITCH HAS
EARNED THAT TREAT FROM MAN BY HARD WAY................UNTIL &amp;
UNLESS THE MAN FEELS THE BITCH DESERVES IT.........

ONE MORE POINT...............TO KEEP THE BITCH ON HER TOES, KEEP
HER ALWAYS GUESSING  &amp; NEVER ALLOW THE BITCH TO TAKE YOU
GRANTED AT ANY POINT IN LIFE..............</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couple of points which I would like to add&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.to what Studioline has<br />
said so far&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>1. MAKE A WIMMIN DEPEND ON YOU FAR MORE&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..THEN YOU GET<br />
TO DEPEND ON WIMMIN&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>THAT MEANS YOU HAVE TO DRILL THE SIMPLE NOTION INTO BITCH&#8217;S<br />
HEAD THAT WHILE YOU ARE INDISPENSABLE TO HER&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..FOR YOU<br />
SHE IS PERFECTLY DISPENSABLE&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..THAT MEANS YOU ARE FAR<br />
MORE WORTHY TO HER&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..THEN SHE IS TO YOU&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>IN SIMPLE TERMS IT MEANS SHE STANDS TO LOSE FAR MORE FROM<br />
THE RELATIONSHIP IF IT BREAKS DOWN THEN YOU STAND TO LOSE<br />
&amp; THE WIMMIN GAINS FAR MORE FROM THE RELATIONSHIP THEN YOU<br />
GAIN FROM IT.</p>
<p>THIS HAS TO BE UNDERSTOOD IN PROPER CONTEXT&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>YOU DON&#8217;T MAKE YOURSELF INDISPENSABLE TO HER BY SENDING<br />
HER UNENDING STREAM OF BOUQUETS, BOOKING MOVIES &amp;<br />
RESTAURANTS,GOING ON SHOPPING &amp; WORLD TOUR WITH HER &amp;<br />
CATERING TO ALL THE UNNECESSARY WANTS,DESIRES OF BITCH WIMMIN &amp; NEITHER YOU MAKE YOURSELF INDISPENSABLE BY<br />
MARRYING A HIGH SALARIED BITCH &amp; PLAYING THE ROLE OF MALE<br />
HOUSEWIFE BY INVOLVING YOURSELF IN HOUSEHOLD CHORES &amp;<br />
RUNNING TO SUPERMARKETS ON GROCERY ERRANDS&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>YOU MAKE YOURSELF INDISPENSABLE BY PLAYING THE ROLE OF<br />
HUNTER GATHERER &amp; PROTECTOR&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;CALL IT ALPHA MALE,<br />
EGOCENTRIC MALE, CHAUVINIST MALE&#8230;&#8230;..OR WHATEVER NAME<br />
FOR THAT MATTER&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.THE TRADITIONAL MALE ROLE WHICH<br />
MEN HAVE PLAYED FOR EONS&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>FACE IT GUYS &amp; WRITE IT IN GOLDEN WORDS SOMEWHERE&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;A WIMMIN LOVES A MAN WHO PLAYS THE ROLE OF LEADER. A MAN WHO<br />
PLAYS THE ROLE OF CAPTAIN &amp; STEERS THE BOAT OR SHIP&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>HOWEVER HARD THE FEMINIST BRAINWASHED PIG BITCHES MIGHT<br />
TRY TO CONVINCE YOU, DETRACT YOU&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.THE GOLDEN TRUTH</p>
<p>IS NO&#8230;NO.. WIMMIN RESPECTS/SHOWS REGARD/FEARS A MAN WHO<br />
ABDICATES/ABSCONDS THE ROLE OF LEADERSHIP &amp; HANDS IT TO<br />
A WIMMIN.</p>
<p>FACE IT GUYS&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.THE MAN COMMANDS RESPECT ONLY WHEN<br />
HE ASSUMES/PLAYS THE ROLE OF BOSS. IF THE FEMINIST BITCH<br />
HARPS ON EQUALITY SHIT&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..MUTUAL RESPECT &amp; OTHER CRAP<br />
CRAP&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;BLAH BLAH&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.SHE IS OPENLY LYING&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;THE<br />
TRUTH IS SHE WANTS TO TAKE CONTROL OF YOU &amp; BECOME YOUR<br />
BOSS&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..THAT IS THE TRUTH GUYS&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>THE FACT IS YOU COMMAND RESPECT&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..YOU DON&#8217;T DEMAND<br />
IT &amp; IT IS NOT HANDED OVER TO YOU BECOZ YOU WANT IT.</p>
<p>{{FUNNY HOW MANY FEMINIST PIG WIMMIN COME OVER HERE &amp; PUT IT AS A<br />
MATTER OF FACT THAT MAN = WIMMIN ,SO MUTUAL RESPECT&#8230;&#8230;..<br />
SO MAN SHOULD RESPECT WIMMIN &amp; WIMMIN RESPECTS MAN &amp; BLAH, BLAH, BLAH&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.FUCKING BS.}}</p>
<p>TO COMMAND RESPECT&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;YOU HAVE TO PROVE YOURSELF FAR MORE WORTHY TO A BITCH&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..THEN SHE IS TO YOU&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>TELL THAT FUCKING BITCH&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;EVEN THOUGH YOU ARE INVOLVED<br />
IN A REGULAR JOB, YOU HOPE TO SEE YOURSELF AS PRESIDENT OF<br />
COMPANY 10-20 YEARS DOWN THE LINE OR EVEN IF YOU DON&#8217;T SEEM TO BE HEADING ANYWHERE 10 YEARS DOWN&#8230;&#8230;..SAY YOU MIGHT<br />
START YOUR OWN BUSINESS/COMPANY &amp; BECOME ITS CEO&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>WIMMIN LIKE MEN WHO ARE AMBITIOUS OR AT LEAST HAVE A LONG<br />
TERM PLAN&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>ALSO KEEP YOURSELF PHYSICALLY ACTIVE &amp; FIT BY GOING TO GYMN SO THAT THE STUPID BITCH FEELS SHE IS HAVING A BODYGUARD TO<br />
PROTECT HER&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>2. MAKE A WIMMIN NEED YOU MORE THEN YOU ACTUALLY NEED HER&#8230;</p>
<p>TRY TO FULFILL A WIMMIN&#8217;S NEEDS/WANTS WHICH ARE LEGITIMATE<br />
&amp; RATIONAL BUT ON ONE CONDITION&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..THE BITCH HAS TO WORK &amp; EARN FOR IT IN A PROPER MANNER/WAY.</p>
<p>TO EARN IT, THE WIMMIN SHOULD FIRST TRY TO FULFILL THE NEEDS/WANTS/WHATEVER TASKS A MAN ASSIGNS TO HER.</p>
<p>IF A WIMMIN SEEKS TRUE LOVE/AFFECTION OR SEXUAL GRATIFICATION, SHE SHOULD BE TOLD TO EARN IT THE HARD WAY.</p>
<p>IN SEX A WIMMIN HAS NO RIGHT TO ASK THE MAN TO SATISFY HER.<br />
&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;{{UNLESS THE WIMMIN HAPPENS TO BE A PORN STAR CAPABLE OF PYROTECHNICS)&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;THE BITCH USUALLY LIES ON<br />
THE BED LIKE A DEAD LOG &amp; THE MAN HAS TO PUT IN ALL THE<br />
PASSION &amp; EFFORT TO AROUSE HER &amp; KEEP THE SEXUAL ACT GOING<br />
&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.THE CONTRIBUTION OF BITCH IN THE ACT IS USUALLY NIL&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;SO THE FUCKING BITCH HAS NO RIGHT TO ASK THE MAN<br />
TO KEEP GOING &amp; SATISFY HER UNTIL &amp; UNLESS THE BITCH HAS<br />
EARNED THAT TREAT FROM MAN BY HARD WAY&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.UNTIL &amp;<br />
UNLESS THE MAN FEELS THE BITCH DESERVES IT&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>ONE MORE POINT&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;TO KEEP THE BITCH ON HER TOES, KEEP<br />
HER ALWAYS GUESSING  &amp; NEVER ALLOW THE BITCH TO TAKE YOU<br />
GRANTED AT ANY POINT IN LIFE&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AHAHAHAHAHA</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-computers/comment-page-21/#comment-555147</link>
		<dc:creator>AHAHAHAHAHA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 06:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050512/women-suck-at-computers/#comment-555147</guid>
		<description>Bet your mother is so proud of you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bet your mother is so proud of you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AHAHAHAHAHA</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-computers/comment-page-21/#comment-555146</link>
		<dc:creator>AHAHAHAHAHA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 06:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050512/women-suck-at-computers/#comment-555146</guid>
		<description>Acutally the only computer course I have ever taken was taught by a woman.  After that, everything else I learned was self taught through my own research and trial/error.   What exactly do you think I am bitching about?  I don&#039;t care if my stepdad or boyfriend are horrible at computers.  I just stated a fact.....they are men and they SUCK at it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Acutally the only computer course I have ever taken was taught by a woman.  After that, everything else I learned was self taught through my own research and trial/error.   What exactly do you think I am bitching about?  I don&#8217;t care if my stepdad or boyfriend are horrible at computers.  I just stated a fact&#8230;..they are men and they SUCK at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AHAHAHAHAHA</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-computers/comment-page-21/#comment-555144</link>
		<dc:creator>AHAHAHAHAHA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 06:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050512/women-suck-at-computers/#comment-555144</guid>
		<description>Sure, Harry......I&#039;ll go get my tool box and get right on it.   Now, did you want your little plaque above the door to read Harry or Fido?  I think a doggy house would be perfect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, Harry&#8230;&#8230;I&#8217;ll go get my tool box and get right on it.   Now, did you want your little plaque above the door to read Harry or Fido?  I think a doggy house would be perfect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watcher</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-computers/comment-page-21/#comment-555100</link>
		<dc:creator>Watcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 03:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050512/women-suck-at-computers/#comment-555100</guid>
		<description>And you must be a fucking retard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you must be a fucking retard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oh shiz</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-computers/comment-page-21/#comment-555089</link>
		<dc:creator>oh shiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 02:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050512/women-suck-at-computers/#comment-555089</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve finally realized, with the help of this website, how great girls are. You must be a fucking genius.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve finally realized, with the help of this website, how great girls are. You must be a fucking genius.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sara</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-computers/comment-page-20/#comment-554788</link>
		<dc:creator>sara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 04:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050512/women-suck-at-computers/#comment-554788</guid>
		<description>go fuck yourselves u gay asses i am a girl and i know a lot about computers infact im a computer geek! so there ya go im taking this site down and there is nothing u can do about it! HA~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>go fuck yourselves u gay asses i am a girl and i know a lot about computers infact im a computer geek! so there ya go im taking this site down and there is nothing u can do about it! HA~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: assd</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-computers/comment-page-20/#comment-553545</link>
		<dc:creator>assd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050512/women-suck-at-computers/#comment-553545</guid>
		<description>Just a mere curiosity, is it a &#039;if-else&#039; or &#039;while&#039;? Neither actually.
The syntex of &#039;if-else&#039; is
        if(condition)
              then {}
        else {} 
 so on. Now what the hell that &#039;do&#039; is doing here?
Besides there is no linkage between &#039;person&#039; and &#039;chauvinist&#039;. If you are upto &#039;structure&#039; then you should write &#039;(person.chauvinist==true)&#039; and &#039;ignore_person ()&#039; is void, literally.
Do you ever compile a single line of code without syntax error?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a mere curiosity, is it a &#8216;if-else&#8217; or &#8216;while&#8217;? Neither actually.<br />
The syntex of &#8216;if-else&#8217; is<br />
        if(condition)<br />
              then {}<br />
        else {}<br />
 so on. Now what the hell that &#8216;do&#8217; is doing here?<br />
Besides there is no linkage between &#8216;person&#8217; and &#8216;chauvinist&#8217;. If you are upto &#8217;structure&#8217; then you should write &#8216;(person.chauvinist==true)&#8217; and &#8216;ignore_person ()&#8217; is void, literally.<br />
Do you ever compile a single line of code without syntax error?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: assd</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-computers/comment-page-20/#comment-553544</link>
		<dc:creator>assd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050512/women-suck-at-computers/#comment-553544</guid>
		<description>Just mere curiosity, is it a &#039;if-else&#039; or &#039;while&#039;? Neither actually.
The syntex of &#039;if-else&#039; is
        if(condition)
              then {}
        else {} 
 so on. Now what the hell that &#039;do&#039; is doing here?
Besides there is no linkage between &#039;person&#039; and &#039;chauvinist&#039;. If you are upto &#039;structure&#039; then you should write &#039;(person.chauvinist==true)&#039; and &#039;ignore_person ()&#039; is void, literally.
Do you ever compile a single line of code without syntax error?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just mere curiosity, is it a &#8216;if-else&#8217; or &#8216;while&#8217;? Neither actually.<br />
The syntex of &#8216;if-else&#8217; is<br />
        if(condition)<br />
              then {}<br />
        else {}<br />
 so on. Now what the hell that &#8216;do&#8217; is doing here?<br />
Besides there is no linkage between &#8216;person&#8217; and &#8216;chauvinist&#8217;. If you are upto &#8217;structure&#8217; then you should write &#8216;(person.chauvinist==true)&#8217; and &#8216;ignore_person ()&#8217; is void, literally.<br />
Do you ever compile a single line of code without syntax error?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: explosive restraint</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-computers/comment-page-20/#comment-551774</link>
		<dc:creator>explosive restraint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050512/women-suck-at-computers/#comment-551774</guid>
		<description>equal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>equal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: studioline</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-computers/comment-page-20/#comment-551645</link>
		<dc:creator>studioline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050512/women-suck-at-computers/#comment-551645</guid>
		<description>sure,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sure,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-computers/comment-page-20/#comment-551626</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 07:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050512/women-suck-at-computers/#comment-551626</guid>
		<description>Studioline, your examples were quite amusing, thank you as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Studioline, your examples were quite amusing, thank you as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: studioline</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-computers/comment-page-20/#comment-551619</link>
		<dc:creator>studioline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 06:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050512/women-suck-at-computers/#comment-551619</guid>
		<description>A whimmin is a whimmin becasue:

she presents to men her whims

when she says word &quot;woman&quot; or &quot;women&quot; it souds like whimmin or at lest looks like she is saying whimmin from the way she moves her mouth.

her only argument towars men in any converstional thread is that she is a woman. for ex Im a woman I want respect. Which is another way of doing whims. 

It&#039;s also the intonation of her voice - without a lie detector a man at once knows she is lying and her dumb ass even doesn&#039;t know it...

The examples could go on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A whimmin is a whimmin becasue:</p>
<p>she presents to men her whims</p>
<p>when she says word &#8220;woman&#8221; or &#8220;women&#8221; it souds like whimmin or at lest looks like she is saying whimmin from the way she moves her mouth.</p>
<p>her only argument towars men in any converstional thread is that she is a woman. for ex Im a woman I want respect. Which is another way of doing whims. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s also the intonation of her voice &#8211; without a lie detector a man at once knows she is lying and her dumb ass even doesn&#8217;t know it&#8230;</p>
<p>The examples could go on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watcher</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-computers/comment-page-20/#comment-551603</link>
		<dc:creator>Watcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 05:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050512/women-suck-at-computers/#comment-551603</guid>
		<description>You are arrogant because you believe the rules of this site should not apply to you.  Sickening!

Why should I reply?  Because this site is ours, for us, for men and we wish to keep it that way.  What do you think the reaction would be if I walked into a female only club?  

For once in your seemingly clueless life, think about it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are arrogant because you believe the rules of this site should not apply to you.  Sickening!</p>
<p>Why should I reply?  Because this site is ours, for us, for men and we wish to keep it that way.  What do you think the reaction would be if I walked into a female only club?  </p>
<p>For once in your seemingly clueless life, think about it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-computers/comment-page-20/#comment-551595</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 04:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050512/women-suck-at-computers/#comment-551595</guid>
		<description>I can understand I may have given the impression of being rude and certainly ignorant, but your accusation of arrogance seems a bit extraneous.

Regardless...  If I annoy you so terribly, why would bother to respond to those points?

You&#039;ve again drawn assumptions, and from where, I have no clue.  My supposed self important ego and feministic qualities are irrelevant, and to mention them is the same.  Either way, thank you for the explanation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand I may have given the impression of being rude and certainly ignorant, but your accusation of arrogance seems a bit extraneous.</p>
<p>Regardless&#8230;  If I annoy you so terribly, why would bother to respond to those points?</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve again drawn assumptions, and from where, I have no clue.  My supposed self important ego and feministic qualities are irrelevant, and to mention them is the same.  Either way, thank you for the explanation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watcher</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-computers/comment-page-20/#comment-551592</link>
		<dc:creator>Watcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 04:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050512/women-suck-at-computers/#comment-551592</guid>
		<description>Actually the rule of this site is &quot;No women&quot;, so apparently you can write but not read - astonishing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually the rule of this site is &#8220;No women&#8221;, so apparently you can write but not read &#8211; astonishing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watcher</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-computers/comment-page-20/#comment-551590</link>
		<dc:creator>Watcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 04:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050512/women-suck-at-computers/#comment-551590</guid>
		<description>You are a rather rude, ignorant and arrogant sort of a person.

You and your attitude epitomise everything that is detestable in women today.  You &#039;apologise&#039; for posting here and are &#039;so very sorry&#039; that you encroach into our privacy, but your curious.  Bless you.

You wish to learn?  Okay, commit this to memory; firstly this site is for men; created, written, maintained and owned.  Not women, no matter how curious they are.

Secondly, we really don&#039;t care if you agree with us or not, we are not here to &#039;persuade&#039; you into our beliefs or way of thinking.

Despite all that I have said, I will answer your last question, on the subject of the word &#039;whimmin&#039; as you clearly seem unable to use the internet as anything more than a vehicle for your self important ego.

The word is a corruption of the alternative spellings to the word &#039;woman&#039; coined by &#039;third wave&#039; and gender feminists.  

Apparently they objected to the word &#039;man&#039; being in &#039;woman&#039; which, at least in their deluded minds, clearly indicated that women were possessions or at least subservient to men, so they used alternative spellings. 

Now it is used pejoratively by those who wish to ridicule the contemporary feminist movement.  

Go post your inane drivel at a feminist site, there are quite literally tens of thousands of them on the net, get your (male) friend to show you one.

I&#039; sure they would welcome you, you would fit right in; you don&#039;t think, you care for none but yourself whilst cultivating an air of caring, innocence. Perfect!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are a rather rude, ignorant and arrogant sort of a person.</p>
<p>You and your attitude epitomise everything that is detestable in women today.  You &#8216;apologise&#8217; for posting here and are &#8217;so very sorry&#8217; that you encroach into our privacy, but your curious.  Bless you.</p>
<p>You wish to learn?  Okay, commit this to memory; firstly this site is for men; created, written, maintained and owned.  Not women, no matter how curious they are.</p>
<p>Secondly, we really don&#8217;t care if you agree with us or not, we are not here to &#8216;persuade&#8217; you into our beliefs or way of thinking.</p>
<p>Despite all that I have said, I will answer your last question, on the subject of the word &#8216;whimmin&#8217; as you clearly seem unable to use the internet as anything more than a vehicle for your self important ego.</p>
<p>The word is a corruption of the alternative spellings to the word &#8216;woman&#8217; coined by &#8216;third wave&#8217; and gender feminists.  </p>
<p>Apparently they objected to the word &#8216;man&#8217; being in &#8216;woman&#8217; which, at least in their deluded minds, clearly indicated that women were possessions or at least subservient to men, so they used alternative spellings. </p>
<p>Now it is used pejoratively by those who wish to ridicule the contemporary feminist movement.  </p>
<p>Go post your inane drivel at a feminist site, there are quite literally tens of thousands of them on the net, get your (male) friend to show you one.</p>
<p>I&#8217; sure they would welcome you, you would fit right in; you don&#8217;t think, you care for none but yourself whilst cultivating an air of caring, innocence. Perfect!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M&#62;W</title>
		<link>http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/women-suck-at-computers/comment-page-20/#comment-551584</link>
		<dc:creator>M&#62;W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 04:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/20050512/women-suck-at-computers/#comment-551584</guid>
		<description>Now would you take a look at that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now would you take a look at that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 1.888 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-03-09 22:11:39 -->
