Women Suck Twice As Hard At Multitasking
Hey here’s a bunch of bullshit:
Men are good at focusing. Women are good at multitasking.
I had to break that woman-maxim into two sentences because not even my mighty man brain could process the fucked up logic there. It’s like trying to dump a bowl of Mueselix into a state of the art DVD player.
Women are shit at doing things — and definitely not as good as men at anything. So we’re supposed to believe that if they do a shitload of things they’re not very good at all at the same time, women suddenly turn into a one-man band with the cymbals between their legs?
Fuck you.
I don’t want to link to an article at the bottom of this page that details an SUV crash in which a woman’s severed arm was found some distance away from the site with a cell phone gripped in her talons like an otter with a delicious clam, but I’m going to. It’s one small example of how shitty women are at doing things at the same time — at multitasking. And that is: completely shitty.
No man anywhere needs any examples on this. Just look at women and their fat asses. If they could multitask at all, they could be running some laps while beating their gums all day long, but they can’t so they don’t. End of story.
The real technical foul here is women and their hand-me-down attitudes toward heaping awards on themselves. It’s women and their society of leftovers. Let me explain.
If men are good at doing things, then women must be good at doing lots of things at the same time, right? Yin and Yang and all that bullshit that no woman has ever actually read but feels as though it speaks to her soul. If men are good at mechanics, women must be good at nurturing. If men are good at making money, then women must be good at managing money or spending it. That’s all a bunch of piddly nonsense.
True, men are good at all those things. Men are good at everything, but no woman has ever proved the same to herself. It’s called the scientific method, proving things, but it should just be called the Man Method because that’s what it is.
Women and their made up Mad Lib character traits, like nurturer and comforter, are like the little brother who gets his older brother’s Batman costume for Halloween and then proclaims loudly that it’s exactly what he’s always wanted.
Then why is there a Superman poster in your room, kid? Why is there a Superman poster?
Harmless Driver. Oops, I meant Armless Driver.
Related Articles:
March 2nd, 2006 at 6:15 pm - IP Man-Hash: 4fcff7a546d6b
Very true. As an example, a lot of my friends with manual cars have been known to talk on a cell phone, eat a burger, and somehow hold a soft drink while shifting. It’s not a wise thing to do at all, but the fact that they have not wrecked yet and that i’ve never been cut off by or have sighted them driving in any way out of the ordinary is a testimate to men’s multitasking skill.
Most women i know however, i give a wide berth to when on a cell phone, and it’s easy to tell, as they weave all over the place.
March 2nd, 2006 at 6:16 pm - IP Man-Hash: f42f82344f9f7
Do you hate your mother? I do not understand why youhave dedicated an entire site to the hatred of women. Of course, you are probably white. So that would explain a lot. Seeing as white men are the devil. Why don’t you go suck George Bush’s cock, you little republican puppet!
March 2nd, 2006 at 7:18 pm - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
See Laws of Women.
Women aren’t hated.
Racist prejudice, check.
Bigotry and hatred, check.
Hatred of homosexuals, check.
Hatred of Republicans, check.
I think I see where the hatred is coming from, and it’s not from this site.
-wolfe
March 2nd, 2006 at 10:44 pm - IP Man-Hash: 49c9ff889fded
Wolfe, impressive. Let me pull up the rule book.
0 - goes without saying
-bfc - doesn’t know what site she is on
1 - yup
2 - yup
a - yup
b - yup
c - yup
d - yup (implied)
e - somewhat
f - no
3 - no, however wsc was stomped on as was bfc
4 - in spades (as in mulitple shovel loads)
5 - yup
All that in six sentences. Michelle really packed in the hatred. And, proved our rules to boot. I must say, you have done a good job with the rules. We may need to get Dick to link them to the front page.
March 2nd, 2006 at 11:16 pm - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
Thanks Biff.
Back to the topic that Dick started (nearly derailed by “Michelle”), there is one minor flaw in his argument, and it relates to comparative advantage. Simplifying, it means that even if you’re bad at something, if you’re less awful at it relative (to other people) with other things that you could do, then you should do that first thing you are bad at.
So, we have:
men: excellent at doing things.
men: ok at “multitasking”
women: bad at doing things (relative to men)
women: bad at multitasking
Since women are basically the same whether “multitasking” or doing one thing, Adam Smith would say they have a comparative advantage at multitasking and should do it.
That’s just economic theory of course.
-wolfe
March 3rd, 2006 at 9:41 am - IP Man-Hash: e2c3aed2658c0
Suck George Bush’s cock? My my.
-Dick