Women Suck Twice As Hard At Multitasking
Hey here’s a bunch of bullshit:
Men are good at focusing. Women are good at multitasking.
I had to break that woman-maxim into two sentences because not even my mighty man brain could process the fucked up logic there. It’s like trying to dump a bowl of Mueselix into a state of the art DVD player.
Women are shit at doing things — and definitely not as good as men at anything. So we’re supposed to believe that if they do a shitload of things they’re not very good at all at the same time, women suddenly turn into a one-man band with the cymbals between their legs?
Fuck you.
I don’t want to link to an article at the bottom of this page that details an SUV crash in which a woman’s severed arm was found some distance away from the site with a cell phone gripped in her talons like an otter with a delicious clam, but I’m going to. It’s one small example of how shitty women are at doing things at the same time — at multitasking. And that is: completely shitty.
No man anywhere needs any examples on this. Just look at women and their fat asses. If they could multitask at all, they could be running some laps while beating their gums all day long, but they can’t so they don’t. End of story.
The real technical foul here is women and their hand-me-down attitudes toward heaping awards on themselves. It’s women and their society of leftovers. Let me explain.
If men are good at doing things, then women must be good at doing lots of things at the same time, right? Yin and Yang and all that bullshit that no woman has ever actually read but feels as though it speaks to her soul. If men are good at mechanics, women must be good at nurturing. If men are good at making money, then women must be good at managing money or spending it. That’s all a bunch of piddly nonsense.
True, men are good at all those things. Men are good at everything, but no woman has ever proved the same to herself. It’s called the scientific method, proving things, but it should just be called the Man Method because that’s what it is.
Women and their made up Mad Lib character traits, like nurturer and comforter, are like the little brother who gets his older brother’s Batman costume for Halloween and then proclaims loudly that it’s exactly what he’s always wanted.
Then why is there a Superman poster in your room, kid? Why is there a Superman poster?
Harmless Driver. Oops, I meant Armless Driver.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 11 10 9 [8] 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 » Show All
And by the way, “Wolfe”, you fag, English is not my first language and, when you consider that I type very fast, it is completely understandable for me to commit the occasional ortographical or syntax error. What is your excuse for using simple words out of context?
P Coderch
Translation:
“I got owned very badly and have no arguments to refute anything that Coderch brilliantly wrote, so I will just pretend that his brilliant arguments are not even worth addressing.”
Thanks, Female, for your admission of defeat. I am so happy right now! LOL!
P Coderch
al comment”>wolfe said:
It could well be. Unfortunately, it’s self-ownage. You’re the first (male?) person on this site that I’ve seen lose to Female. In fact, apart from women, you’re the first person I’ve seen that repeatedly gets owned by the [Quote] function of this board.
And you’re right, I really shouldn’t bother replying to you, because your idea of an argument is to repeat what you said, and ignore the fact that your arguments have been logically demolished.
What again makes me think of you as a woman is that all of your arguments are emotional and subjective. At the heart, I’m bad because you don’t like me. That’s fine. But it’s emotional and subjective. If we probe deeper, we find that I remind you of aspects of ‘the establishment’ that ‘abused’ you. It is regrettable that you had a miserable childhood. But this sort of emotional projection is the manifestation of a very fragile psyche.
If you are a woman, then your behavior is probably just barely within normal boundaries of sanity. If you are a man, then your behavior is way, way outside and you need to seek professional help swiftly.
Ah well, PC, onwards to lose, badly, in your perpetual war with the Quote function. To say nothing of your losses in the long twilight struggle with your keyboard and the magic CAPS KEY.
-wolfe
It could well be. Unfortunately, it’s self-ownage. You’re the first (male?) person on this site that I’ve seen lose to Female. In fact, apart from women, you’re the first person I’ve seen that repeatedly gets owned by the [Quote] function of this board.
And you’re right, I really shouldn’t bother replying to you, because your idea of an argument is to repeat what you said, and ignore the fact that your arguments have been logically demolished.
What again makes me think of you as a woman is that all of your arguments are emotional and subjective. At the heart, I’m bad because you don’t like me. That’s fine. But it’s emotional and subjective. If we probe deeper, we find that I remind you of aspects of ‘the establishment’ that ‘abused’ you. It is regrettable that you had a miserable childhood. But this sort of emotional projection is the manifestation of a very fragile psyche.
If you are a woman, then your behavior is probably just barely within normal boundaries of sanity. If you are a man, then your behavior is way, way outside and you need to seek professional help swiftly.
Ah well, PC, onwards to lose, badly, in your perpetual war with the Quote function. To say nothing of your losses in the long twilight struggle with your keyboard and the magic CAPS KEY.
-wolfe
How exactly did I lose to female, if I easily refuted everything she said with logic, reason and common sense? I know that you’re her lackey, but being sycophantic towards that cunt even when I owned her is beneath even you - oh, wait, nothing is beneath you.
And how exactly am I emotional? After all, it is you who believes that a circumcised Jew who lived two millenia ago is the embodiment of a God for which there is no evidence that he exists. If this is not hysterical behavior, then what it?
P Coderch
Questions you can’t answer unless he pays you? Well, that is the worst defense I have ever seen anyone use to some pretty relevant questions.
By that, I mean these:
Perhaps she is a lawyer, but then she would ask that you remit consultancy fees. She used the word ‘dues’ so I am optimistically hoping that she wants you to join her club/association. I’m quite sure that she means something else, but alas, I shall give her the benefit of my false naïveté.
Well one thing is for sure, you won’t find us on a womens site trying to convince them that everything they say is wrong and they are to blame for everything. It’s the last thing we want is attention from a bunch of
ignorant women like yourself. Not everything revolves around sex and relationships of the oposite sex.
It goes to show you how much you women really need men.
You couldn’t get nowhere in this world without us. But we built the world and don’t need you.
She is asking me to “pay” her dues, Dick. What say you? Hehe.
Do it twice as much.
-Dick
It could well be. Unfortunately, it’s self-ownage. You’re the first (male?) person on this site that I’ve seen lose to Female. In fact, apart from women, you’re the first person I’ve seen that repeatedly gets owned by the [Quote] function of this board.
And you’re right, I really shouldn’t bother replying to you, because your idea of an argument is to repeat what you said, and ignore the fact that your arguments have been logically demolished.
What again makes me think of you as a woman is that all of your arguments are emotional and subjective. At the heart, I’m bad because you don’t like me. That’s fine. But it’s emotional and subjective. If we probe deeper, we find that I remind you of aspects of ‘the establishment’ that ‘abused’ you. It is regrettable that you had a miserable childhood. But this sort of emotional projection is the manifestation of a very fragile psyche.
If you are a woman, then your behavior is probably just barely within normal boundaries of sanity. If you are a man, then your behavior is way, way outside and you need to seek professional help swiftly.
Ah well, PC, onwards to lose, badly, in your perpetual war with the Quote function. To say nothing of your losses in the long twilight struggle with your keyboard and the magic CAPS KEY.
-wolfe
You’re filled with questions MansVoice. Questions I can’t answer unless you pay as per your mandate that I charge for my services.
Then why are you replying if you are bored? To get the last word? Provoke you? You were told to get out of this site or be cursed/sweared at. You chose to stay. Face the consequences. The truth hurts but you are an attention whore. I dont want to be euphemistic and label you a “feminist”(they go hand in hand) because that seems to make you “proud”.
Nay, ’tis professional modesty at work.
Why not? The truth hurts, doesn’t it?
Then I guess that makes you a vicarious attention seeker through feeding me.
In other words, I wouldn’t call myself a whore but I do feel like you are soliciting my time and attention, and as I’m somewhat bored with you and your obvious attempts to provoke me on another blog, kindly stop.
I have stated my reasons for being here - anti-feminism. Unlike you, I dont squirrel around the issue with an ad hominem. You are here to seek attention. That makes you an attention seeker and a whore. Point!
PC, thanks for the laughs, as always.
MansVoice, just because you and Billy are both here looking for men, doesn’t mean we all are.
Then are you here to look for a jerk like all those other whores before you? Unless I am mistaken, which I am not, you women seem to love us condescending jerks alot. Perhaps it is because we treat women as what they are - commodities.
GUYS COP&PASTE MY REPLY TO THAT BITCH “FEMALE” IN THIS THREAD AS IT IS THE MOST MASSIVE PAW4EDGE IJN INTERNET HISTORY. SHE ALSO SAID THAT SHE WON’T REPLY, WHICH IS AN ADMISSION OF DEFEAT.
P Coderch
Did you know Moses?
Warcraft is Starcraft’s nephew? Can you get any more stupid? The first version of Warcraft came in 1994, while Starcraft was created in 1998. LOL…dumass.
P Coderch