Women With Male Friends Are Delusional
Women think if you leave a head of lettuce at the bowling alley, it will eventually turn into a bowling ball.
Now I don’t have anything personally against women, but that is fucking dumb.
Sack of dirt dumb.
Women also think having a bunch of male friends makes them better than other women. Women are raving, hateful misogynists in that way. Apparently “misogyny” means a hatred of women, and I can’t think of anything more hateful than thinking you’re better than someone just because you’re not friends with them. That borders on racism.
Women are also wrong. Having male friends doesn’t make a woman special or not a bitch. Actually, it makes her ten times the bitch.
Maybe women think these things about bowling balls and themselves because the majority of their lives revolve around laundry. If you put a bunch of white shit in with something red, all the whites get ruined. Well life doesn’t work that way.
Women with male friends are not more fun to be around — despite how often they repeat the exact opposite. Fun doesn’t work by osmosis. And fun sure and shit doesn’t work by telling everyone how fucking phenomenally fun and laid back you are. Being a fun person is like being a pedophile. The more you tell people you are one, the less likely they are to believe you.
Women who have only man-friends are also not magically less high maintenance than other women. They’re actually much more high maintenance. Just look at the numbers. They’re so high maintenance, they need five or eight guys just to keep their egos properly stoked. Does that sound fun to you?
If it does, you’re a man, so the first thing you wouldn’t do was hammer it down everyone’s throat. We get the fucking picture. You think you’re incredible. Now how exactly does that make you different from other women?
It doesn’t.
Where do women even get this shit? Do women think hanging around a bunch of pilots makes you a pilot? Do women who know mostly psychologists start charging by the hour to espouse their bullshit philosophies on life?
Women have no philosophies on life.
Women who have mostly male friends are just lazy. See, being friends with men is easy as ruining toast. Men are natural friendsters and that’s all there is too it. That’s why that myth about women not liking “nice guys” is so stupid. All men are nice. We’re like fucking Sesame Street.
Women are horrible friends. Actually, that’s the reason women hate sports. They’ve turned the act of being friends into a sport all on it’s own — a Bloodsport. It’s got winners and losers, consequences, and it’s as competitive, cut-throat, and bloody as boxing, hockey fights, and stabbing someone in the gut all rolled into one. To women, friendship is a sport — a sport by jackasses, for jackasses.
Women who have mostly male friends are just quitters. Or lousy competitors. Whatever they are, they’re not better than other women like they repeat time and time again. That should be the first give away. They’re still got all the same lesserness than men of other women, except they couldn’t stand the heat of the kitchen, so they took their sorry ass into the man-den to nurse their wounds.
What are we going to do, kick them out? Please. Men have been propping women up for a hundred thousand years.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 4 [3] 2 1 » Show All
I’ve never had a dull time having conversations with men only.
Women however… can talk for 15 minutes to have me go “uh huh” and then they talk for another 15 minutes… get to the point… relay the information without the “his sister is that chick whom we saw at the mall wearing those shoes that my friend Jesabelle wants from seeing that movie about those aliens that take over yer mind.. anyways.. so she’s standing there..”
At that point I just start imagining myself having ludicrous sexual relations with her to keep myself from falling asleep.
1) I’ve spent my entire adult life “swimming upstream” and perhaps it’s only habit. There are some regular posters from whom I have gained insight that I find valuable in raising boy-children to become good men. Of late, there are a fair number of men who are the antithesis of that characterization, but I’m able to discern the difference. Abuse? Pfft. Nothing said changes the truth, and I know the truth about myself. As for the clear prohibition, without the friction created by the female contingent, the complexion of the discussion would be very different, and (dare I say?) a bit dull.
2) Cosmologist for NASA. Past tense at this point in time.
Dr_Z, I’ll probably lose “man points” for asking this, but I don’t really care because real men are self-assured enough not to give a shit what people think.
You are far more thoughtful, intelligent and articulate than 99% of women I’ve come across and seem to represent the antithesis of modern feminism, which is refreshing. Most women I come across lie, have an inherent sense of entitlement, are lazy, and see men as “providers” (read “wage slaves”) so they can do what they want while the man spends his time working.
(OK, at this point I see most of the men here rolling their eyes and saying, “Damn it Sam, stop complimenting the woman … it’ll give her ideas!” Guys, this isn’t a compliment, it’s an observation.)
You seem to be decent and fair-minded. (Damn, there go my man points again…) I’m sure you understand that this is a place where men can gripe and exchange viewpoints without the inhibiting presence of women — sort of like a titty bar, except without the strippers and beer.
I have two questions: 1) Why do you post here, despite the continuing abuse you receive and Dick’s clear prohibition against female posters? I’m just curious. 2) You mentioned your career. What did you do?
Very well said, DakotaSmith. That’s it in a nutshell. That’s precisely why I never had female friends. Generally, when men spend time with their female friends, they’re thinking of ways they can have sex with them and get away with it.
My children love me, my marriage was important to me (not so much to him), and I had a career I was quite proud of. Oh, and I stayed faithful to the end. It’s too bad that you can’t remember that there are good women out there, Dakota. At one time, you were very interesting to talk to, and even respectful of one woman’s career.
Best.
You can’t take gender out of it. Gender is the point of it.
Exclusively (or even primarily) hanging around members of the opposite sex when one is married is unwise. Period. Doing so makes it far more likely that one will succumb to instinctive impulses that are almost certainly detrimental to one’s marriage.
You just don’t do it, men or women. I would have the same level of contempt for a married man who spent all his time hanging out with women as I would with a woman who hung out with men. It’s intentionally putting oneself into a situation that encourages having an affair.
The only delineation between men and women in this instance is one of biology and self-delusion. Men usually understand that hanging out with women is a means toward sleeping with as many of them as humanly possible. Women delude themselves that the men around them are interested in something other than sex.
As to the question of maximizing one’s potential, the fact of the matter is that sometimes one can’t maximize one’s potential. You make choices based on what’s important to you.
Example: I am not presently maximizing my potential. I’m making a living in my chosen field, but in a position well below my abilities. I’m doing this on purpose so as to reserve as much time as humanly possible for visitation with my children.
The needs of my children, you see, are more important than maximizing my work potential.
Similarly, one decides if one’s marriage is more important than maximizing their potential. I would suggest that if one chooses potential over one’s marriage, then one has prioritized as to what is actually important to them.
And that’s fine: if maximizing your potential is more important than remaining faithful to your spouse, more power to you. Just don’t be surprised if you someday find yourself having sex with someone other than your spouse. It was, after all, your choice.
Let me rephrase, then. What if a woman’s natural proclivity is toward a male-dominated field (science generally, astrophysics specifically for the sake of argument) and she has the opportunity to be gainfully employed in said field. Is it your assertion that it is better for her to turn away from the benefits, both financial and intellectual, and take a secretarial position?
Taking gender out of the argument (it’s a stretch, but humor me), do you not think it is to the benefit of an employer to have each worker fulfilling their highest potential? In other words, if a physicist takes a job as a secretary, that leaves someone whose maximum potential is to answer the phone and make coffee without gainful employement, and a physicist’s position open.
I wasn’t actually intending to be amusing, other than to point out the poster’s objection to the article while simultaneously proving its basic tenet (”Women also think having a bunch of male friends makes them better than other women”).
In terms of her being an affair waiting to happen, I was deadly serious. Married persons should no more spend time socializing with the opposite sex than they should walk down dark alleys brandishing hundred dollar bills. Bad Things are likely to happen if you do, in either case.
Um … you’re kidding, right? I’ve never seen a female-dominated field whose skills couldn’t be learned in fairly short order — with the exception, I suppose, of health care.
Though I may have to re-think that, given my last hospital visit about two months ago. The nurses there were utterly incompetent, and only my own knowledge of my condition kept me from being made worse under their care.
But the average female-dominated field (secretary, receptionist, prostitute, bank teller, etc) has a skillset that can be learned in very short order by almost anyone.
I’m not sure how to interpret this. If she’s on the level, then all I can say is finally anti-feminism is having its desired effect by a very small number of women showing male characteristics, namely independence, self-determination, an identity of one’s own, etc. Dakota Smith, chicks like this ARE better than other women. (Although they’re still not as good as men.)
But I don’t think it’s real. More likely this is the equivalent of a Penthouse letter. It’s all made up just to appeal to what we would like to imagine a good woman to be like — not crazy and parasitic. I think she’s just another ditzy 19 year old welding school drop-out chick who does IM and her Blackberry too much. It sounds too good to be true, and you know how chicks love to lie.
@Dakota: Funniest logic stream I’ve read all week. Thanks for a chuckle. What if some of us simply don’t have the skill set necessary to work in a female-dominated field?
Which in your mind makes you better than other women, right?
Which in your mind makes you better than other women, right?
Which in your mind makes you better than other women, right?
Which in your mind makes you better than other women, right?
Which in your mind makes you better than other women, right?
Which in your mind makes you better than other women, right?
Which in your mind makes you better than other women, right?
Let’s just lay it out on the table: your choices are unusual and say a lot about you. You’ve chosen a field that exposes you almost exclusively to men. Furthermore, unless you’re grossly unattractive, each and every one of those men wants to have sex with you. If you tell yourself otherwise, you’re lying to yourself or you’re grossly stupid.
So … you’ve chosen to be surrounded by people who want to have sex with you, and this in spite of the fact that you’re married.
Why would you choose to do this? For most women, it would be the attention of all those men simultaneously trying to get into your pants.
Nice for you, I guess, but I’d be pretty worried if I was your husband. Ten guys around you trying to constantly get into your pants, and you with a self-admitted hyperactive sex drive? How long will it be before you get super-horny (or drunk — I’m sure your male friends and co-workers like to get you drunk) and spread your legs? Not long, I’m betting.
In fact, I’d be willing to be it’s already happened. Right? Be truthful.
One of the things an adult does is not put themselves in a situation where something bad is likely to happen. I don’t make a habit of wandering around dark alleys with hundred dollar bills hanging out of my pockets, for example. When I was married, I didn’t go socializing with women for precisely the same reason.
Women who choose to do what you’ve done are an affair waiting to happen. How about showing your husband a bit more respect and getting coworkers and friends who aren’t all trying to have sex with you?
i am fine if they stay polite. just stop with the laughing. do girls laugh at EVERYTHING?
I feel as though reading the female comments are going to end up killing me.
First I just want to apologize for being here. I know you don’t want women on the site…lol - but I had to comment and admit that the majority of what you’re saying is true and it makes good sense. Especially this post.
I think the site is hilarious. I couldn’t stop laughing…
You need a Television show…I would tune in every night…
Love it!
Jessica
i agree with dick on the whole osmosis thing. women like to think that hanging around with cool people ie guys in general makes them “cooler” than the rest of their clan/clique/whores whatever. we have cool guys but we never never NEvER have cool women because they simply dont exist. its a guy thing which is inbred in us… they try to get close to us or the people who are accepted as “socially cool” to be “cool and with the in” crowd but really, they just fail terribly. i am fine with that but if a bitch gets all high and mighty, by all means, give her a big FUCK you to remind her of her place in society… on her knees.
thumbs up dick, great article!
Chalk that up in the W column.
What’s that now, 9168413168479841321685494132135468-0?
Somewhere around there.
So I guess you agree that men are better than women.
This article claims that women with alot of male friends think they are better then other women. That is not true. I wish women would have something to do with me. None of the do. I can only be friends with men because men are the only ones who want anything to do with me.
Guys, you have to consider the possibilities that Gabriella is not pretty and guys are not at all attracted to her and therefore, friendship is possible!
What is it with you women who always claim that they don’t need a man or they have their own money and will pay for themselves and such! It is such an insult to men because first it is not true, women need men like men need women unless you are gay! Does saying that makes a woman look smarter or appear more indepentant? NO!! Second, it shows men that you already think they are scums who’s can buy you for sex(or why else would you forewarn them?). Thanks to feminazis, women think men are out to get sex. Rediculas