Women Would Vote for Hitler
A woman voting on anything other than American Idol or her personal favorite type of chocolate is like watching a small child run full speed into a wall. Clearly the fundamentals are understood. The child runs, it’s going somewhere and there’s no doubt about that. The child can run. But very quickly one comes to the understanding that somewhere, somehow, the process has been perverted. Then comes the wall. Then comes the crying.
Women would vote for Hitler. Not because a woman could be talked into buying a catsup Popsicle while she was wearing white gloves, but because women are all fascists.
Don’t believe me? Let’s leave the constant threat of castration out of it for the moment. That makes it a slam dunk in my book, but that’s fine. Women are just “joking” whenever they play fascism card #1.
How about oppressive dictatorship by force or threat of violence?
Anyone who’s married will tell you a lot of things. The first of which will be, “Don’t get fucking married for any reason you dumb shit.” But a likely secondary is that marriage is not a democracy. What is it then?
Marriage is a fascist dictatorship of oppression — and so is any relationship with a woman. Work, professional, “professional”; they’re all the same. If you don’t like the flavor of the Kool-Aid and you want to add some mix, prepare to have a wailing siren of bullshit go off in your ear. That’s assault and that’s oppression. That’s enforcing your opinion through the threat of violence. If you press the issue, prepare to receive the threat of withheld friendship — or even sex whether it’s applicable or not! There was another man who pulled the same kind of shit. Yep, Hitler.
The biggest women/fascism link is a woman’s reliance on violence. Women will be the first to hit during any kind of dispute. It’s not even a percentage. It’s as much of a guarantee as it is that the sun will rise tomorrow. And as men we can all understand that the sun rises because it’s actually a star that our planet rotates around, therefore it is guaranteed to rise. We are able to remove ourselves from our personal point of view and understand that the sun isn’t rising at all. It’s actually us who are spinning around the sun. Women don’t even fucking know that.
Every morning when a woman wakes up at the crack of 10:30 she’s thrilled to shit to see that the sun’s in the sky again and her fake orange tan will look just as radiant as it did yesterday. That’s one of the biggest reasons why women shouldn’t vote. They don’t know fucking anything about anything. They know nothing.
But that’s not why women would vote for Hitler if given the chance. Say what you want about the merits of an individual ethos of governments as you will. You’re all men and therefore deserve the right to express opinion unmitigated by slander or censure. What I’m saying is that by an intrinsic party affiliation — fascist — all women would check the box marked ‘Kill Or Savagely Beat Anyone Who Doesn’t Agree With Me’. That fact has always held women back more than any mythical glass ceiling.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 106 … 18 17 16 15 14 [13] 12 11 10 9 8 … 1 » Show All
hitler, yum.
Lostoyannaya said:
All metaphors apart, I find it highly amusing that you assume it’s bad for women to vote for Hitler…
…But totally okay that Hitler was male.
*shrug*.
-You speak Veritas Lost, it is true that Hitler was male, however that just goes to prove this websites premise, that Men are better than women. We are better all around no doubt about it. Killing people? Men are definitely better, as a matter of fact the only thing we can’t do better is incubate a child. Thats why we have you ladies around I suppose, however don’t blame us, why dont you just blame evolution for your problems (something you ladies are good at)?
“I guess we know who you’d have voted for.”
Yeah.
The other guy.
But would she be capable of filling in the ballot paper. My guess would be an informal vote.
Hmmm. Large numbers of women vote for an evil candidate and are arguably decisive in propelling him into office.
One man is evil. Given the number of female German leaders (zero until 2006) any German leader, good or evil, was bound to be a man.
You equate these two because…? Oh, got it. You’re a woman and logic is somewhat alien to you. No probs. I guess we know who you’d have voted for.
-wolfe
All metaphors apart, I find it highly amusing that you assume it’s bad for women to vote for Hitler…
…But totally okay that Hitler was male.
*shrug*.
Must be from all those feminists you gobble down.
@son Yes, I did understand that was the analogy you were drawing. I find it unpersuasive on many counts. That said, you’re a man and it’s certainly an interesting idea. Perhaps I’ll write more, but as I’m recovering from dental surgery, I’m not in the mood to get too into depth.
@gwallan Good one. “Always look on the bright side of life”
-wolfe
You misunderstood me Wolfe.
I wasn’t saying that Christ is representative of Vietnam or Iraq or anything else today. I was just saying that he changed not only the Jews but the Roman empiire forever.
From a military stand point I’m saying. I wasn’t comparing Christ to Vietnam and Iraq but the goths to those countries, and Rome to us.
I love that sketch! LMAO!
It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers-out of unorthodoxy.
George Orwell 1984
Who, I must admit, I’m starting to consider the greatest prophet of all time.
The Monty Python crew understood this.
From The Life of Brian
Yep, some might say stoning someone to death because passions are high is actually a rather cowardly, womanly act.
As for comparing Christ with Vietnam and Iraq, it’s certainly novel, but ahistorical and unlikely to win any great prize for thinking or theology outside of the most extreme liberation (read: Marxist) schools of thought.
-wolfe
Son of Suns that is way off.
I presume you’re referring Jesus allowing the adultress woman to go free. He did not change the law but fullfilled them.
It was a mob trying to stone the woman and that was unbiblical.
She must first have been tried before the ruler or govenor.
You need proof and not a mob style justice.
Sounds like Christ fucked everyone over then.
Destroyed Roman power and confidence and turned them into a bunch of sissy boy dipshits who couldn’t kill a bunch of unorganized goths. Sounds like Vietnam and Iraq.
Then he destroyed the Jewish old testament fundemental truth of “men are better at EVERYTHING” with his blessing of whores instead of stoning them to death and getting their promiscious genes out of the pool.
But the Muslims are still manly, they just kicked Israel’s ass and if America loses in Iraq or a future adventure in Persia, you can kiss the West good bye. Alpha males the world over will convert. Nice try. Nothing lasts forever.
It’s a good thing. Women are second class citizens. They can’t do anything. No document of historical significance has ever treated women any differently. None ever will.
-Dick
Actually Billy it was given to the “Sons” of Aaron to teach and become priests, though any male could become a priest. Women were and are respected however, the belief still stands that since men and women are fundamentally different; we must have been made for different (though not necessarily more important) purposes. Women were not among the Rabbis in ancient time and were not allowed to hold such titles until recently. While the Tanak does not say “women cannot be Rabbis.” It was understood that the “Sons” of Aaron taught the men and the men would then teach their families. The argument for that being, men tend to be more skeptical and thus less likely to be lead astray.
- Oldone
I’m not sure that is a bad thing since women got power and we have become the 2nd class citizens today. There were women in the old testament who were allowed to be judges and other highly regarded figures.
There was a time when God threatened to curse the Israelites because the women ruled them. Maybe the curse was just the typical calamity that goes with women and power. It was appointed for men to rule.
Yeah, as Dick says with the OT. While you can certainly point out a surprising number of agnostic/atheistic female Jews who’ve become crazed feminists, one could make the argument that theologically Christianity is more to blame than any other religion offhand.
Well except the earth-goddess/Wiccan/Gaia types.
I believe, though could be mistaken, that most of the suffragettes, and all of the crazed anti-alcohol proto-feminists were Christian women.
I don’t, of course, blame Christianity; it’s more complicated than that. But certainly there are (generally NT) Biblical passages which feminists deployed to great effect.
-wolfe
The Old Testament regards women as second class citizens — much like mules or oxen. It’s much like the American Constitution in that way.
-Dick
So was Ana Pauker. Arguably, one of the more woeful evils to befall Romania. An axe handle itself.