Women Would Vote for Hitler
A woman voting on anything other than American Idol or her personal favorite type of chocolate is like watching a small child run full speed into a wall. Clearly the fundamentals are understood. The child runs, it’s going somewhere and there’s no doubt about that. The child can run. But very quickly one comes to the understanding that somewhere, somehow, the process has been perverted. Then comes the wall. Then comes the crying.
Women would vote for Hitler. Not because a woman could be talked into buying a catsup Popsicle while she was wearing white gloves, but because women are all fascists.
Don’t believe me? Let’s leave the constant threat of castration out of it for the moment. That makes it a slam dunk in my book, but that’s fine. Women are just “joking” whenever they play fascism card #1.
How about oppressive dictatorship by force or threat of violence?
Anyone who’s married will tell you a lot of things. The first of which will be, “Don’t get fucking married for any reason you dumb shit.” But a likely secondary is that marriage is not a democracy. What is it then?
Marriage is a fascist dictatorship of oppression — and so is any relationship with a woman. Work, professional, “professional”; they’re all the same. If you don’t like the flavor of the Kool-Aid and you want to add some mix, prepare to have a wailing siren of bullshit go off in your ear. That’s assault and that’s oppression. That’s enforcing your opinion through the threat of violence. If you press the issue, prepare to receive the threat of withheld friendship — or even sex whether it’s applicable or not! There was another man who pulled the same kind of shit. Yep, Hitler.
The biggest women/fascism link is a woman’s reliance on violence. Women will be the first to hit during any kind of dispute. It’s not even a percentage. It’s as much of a guarantee as it is that the sun will rise tomorrow. And as men we can all understand that the sun rises because it’s actually a star that our planet rotates around, therefore it is guaranteed to rise. We are able to remove ourselves from our personal point of view and understand that the sun isn’t rising at all. It’s actually us who are spinning around the sun. Women don’t even fucking know that.
Every morning when a woman wakes up at the crack of 10:30 she’s thrilled to shit to see that the sun’s in the sky again and her fake orange tan will look just as radiant as it did yesterday. That’s one of the biggest reasons why women shouldn’t vote. They don’t know fucking anything about anything. They know nothing.
But that’s not why women would vote for Hitler if given the chance. Say what you want about the merits of an individual ethos of governments as you will. You’re all men and therefore deserve the right to express opinion unmitigated by slander or censure. What I’m saying is that by an intrinsic party affiliation — fascist — all women would check the box marked ‘Kill Or Savagely Beat Anyone Who Doesn’t Agree With Me’. That fact has always held women back more than any mythical glass ceiling.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 107 … 25 24 23 22 21 [20] 19 18 17 16 15 … 1 » Show All
P Coderch is right and women have no sense of justice.
Nope, no male bias there, not at all.
Stop stalking me you fool.
It doesen’t matter, because Hitler had a stereotypically masculine personality that women find appealing. No one said that it’s one given trait that makes a woman see a man as an alpha.
I don’t think that the women of Germany voted for Hitler because they agrred with his agenda: they voted for him because they agreed with his personality. You see, to women all that matters is personality and attitude. Most women would regard a murderous rapper wears the right cloths and has lots of charisma and personality as being smarter than a charmless, socially incompetent nuclear physicist who revolutionized quatum mechanics and who has an I.Q of 160. The fact that the rapper has an I.Q of 80 is irrelevant: he’s smarter to women because he imposes himself socially more. One of the greatest tragedies of this World is that the smartest of men don’t seem to be very successful at passing on their genes to the next generation.
Women have a brain profile which is geared towards empathy. This is due to the fact that they are the primary care-givers to children and, thus, need to be good at reading emotional and social cues. Unfortunately, this pre-disposes women to strongly favor men who are socially dominant. Why? Because in primitive societies, the most dominant men is the one who can give the children the best possible conditions. This means tha women will always va;ue the men who’s on top, irrespective of how he got there, or males who impose themselves socially the more, thus giving clues as being more dominant. You are a retard, “Female”, because you assume that there we’re arguing that there’s one specific type of male that women gor for; no, there’s PROFILE of men wome go for: the socially dominant one. And whether such men is a ruthless businessman, a nice politician or murderous tyrant is immaterial.
Now, I must finish this off with a comment Here goes: I hate your guts. I hate you because like most cunts of your ilk, you’re gender-biased and yert proclaim to be in favor of the equality of the sexes. You have no ethical standing in this discussion, because ethics pressuposes the equal moral standing of individuals as being resposnsible for their own actions and possesed of the same rights, and yet you clarly show a bias in favor of females and tend to put them on a moral pedestal, when in fact femicunts are morally despicable.
I was appalled, shoicked and deeply offended by your assertion that it’s ok for adults to sexually prey on adolescents, as long as the adults are female and the adolescents, male. Do you have any idea of how ethically despicable you are for saying that? Do you have any idea of how you make me feel, as a Human Being, for saying that I should not have the same rights as females in virtue os my gender? So a woman can have sex with a 15 year-old boy because “he wants it”, but I can’t have sex with a 15 year-old girl - even if she wants it -, because female people are so special and good, and should be protected from those evil predatorial adult males. Boys, on the other hand, are filthy sex animals anyway, so the adult women who has sex with them are not only not committing a crime, but actually doing them a favor. Take note, gentlemen, because this is the compassion that femicunts have for male children and adolescents. The fact that many of these bitches are mothers of adolescent boys and still say that goes to show what mosnters they are. I hate you.
I suppose mister Morgethau had good (emotional if not rational or compassionate nor forgiving) reason to want to stick it to the ‘krauts’ though.
I hope this doesn’t qualify me an antisemite.
- Alb & Negru - Je Taime
Sly is the one who goes by the moniker of Wolfe. Chronologically, history being what it is, I can’t see how causality isn’t arguable, let alone defensible in this particular instance.
Granted, no causality. However, the Brits and French did it first. The battle for the Atlantic, as fought by nazi Germany, is nonetheless inexcusable. I believe I’ve already mentioned that submariners are alien honour.
Sure, Germany’s herself premiered some awful deeds to be remembered by as well. Resorting first to the use of poison gas on the battlefield, introducing humanity to the cheerful delight that is chemical warfare. The atrocious and murderous mistreatment of Slavic and Mongol soviet prisoners on the Eastern Front. Let alone the already long consacrated second war genocidal pleasantries in all of occupied territories, with or without the complicity of local governments or governmental constituents.
Also granted, I’m no historical expert. Nevertheless, how could I, or anyone for that matter, possibly not ascribe negative morality to that? Or the, infamous if not for obscurity, Morgenthau Plan? Please excuse me if this can somehow be construed as me attempting to lecture you on history. I recognize my, at least relative, shorthandedness in the field.
But it seems to me you’re arguing the British and French ought be excused because the nazies did it afterwards as well.
I believe you rip what you sow.
- Holly Dolly - Dolly song (Original Mix)
Women aren’t smart enought to realize that someone is a pathologically narcissistic sociopath. And most are attracted to narsistic behaviours.
Most women love any man with power.
It is hard to believe now but many Austrian women stood in the streets throwing their undies and roses at Hitler when he arrived in he city.
Only a sexually aroused woman would throw things like that at a man, even though he was short, ugly and had a goofy moustache. This proves the theory that women are attracted to power and have terrible judgement.
Sony, you hinted at this before. I didn’t address it, since I viewed your other arguments as asinine at the time. Rightly or wrongly, you do write with considerable emotion.
It’s an interesting belief. In the past, you ascribed a moral value to it. I will say this: anyone who studies history cannot possibly ascribe negative morality to the blockade by the Royal Navy in the light of the near German starvation of the UK in ‘17-’18 and (even though I’m not suggesting post hoc ergo propter hoc) ‘40-’42 via U-boat warfare.
What you’re justifiably upset by is the confluence of Napoleonic-era mobilization capability (as exemplified by Germany) with early 19th century financial capability (as exemplified by Britain), and the general might of the Royal Navy, combined, finally, with a willingness to hit civilians.
Oh and the huge imposed reparations? Yep, total crap.
-wolfe
-I am rather well read in my view, and I had a phase when I was interested in serial killers as well. I found them fascinating when I was younger. I was curious as to how they became that way. Most of them are extremely intelligent, however twisted their reasoning may be for killing. Which disturbs me as well, . I don’t know why some people end up that way. For example Ted Bundy had many, many more opportunities in life than I did, however you won’t find me murdering college girls in dorm rooms. How were they twisted like that? I don’t think that morality is an inherent part of human nature, I believe that it must be taught.
He lost his sanity because in part, he was a Meth addict and had from what I have read an unstable mind. Besides being drunk on power, he also had an early form of methamphetimine created for his troops which he in turn partook.
You completely destroyed your argument at “like seriously”.
Thats fine, as long as you understand that its us that are laughing at you.
-Strength and Honor-
As usual you prove your logically backrupt femininity by having a well written prettily decorated post with absolutely no fucking point.
75% of German women voted for Hitler.
There’s other type of men your kind like besides the Clinton sexual predator types. That’s beta male providers, which Hitler the war hero was not, but played well at.
Vegetarianism, non-smoking, barely drinking, and the beta male government standard: socialism. Germany was the first modern welfare state and Hitler knew how to get elected and knew who was easiest to manipulate. And the men in the Army who followed did not for riches, but for power, glory and revenge against the “morally degenerate trade bloc” of the Western Allies and most especially the Treaty of Versailles.
So, you’re implicitely stating that German women voted for him in droves?
- morandi - Reverse
This may come as a big suprise to you Dick, but there are other forms of power aside from meglomaniacal control. I’m kind of sorry to break this to you but many women do not find pathologically narcissistic sociopaths, all that attractive.
To women, power is attractive.
-Dick
Just on Hitler. He was short, had a bad bowl hair-cut, jodpurs for gods sake, a barely conceiled terrible two’s personality and last but not least, a stupid moustache. He was not attractive so that turns Dick’s theory that women vote for whoever they think is good looking, on its head. What his many minions of men, eager to do his beck and call ever saw in him, I do not know. Perhaps he bought their loyalty and bidding with assurances of wealth beyond their imagination. New theory. Men vote for whoever promises riches, no matter how this is to be done.
It’s comments like yours that keep me from sleeping soundly at night.
- Los Paraguayos - Adoro
Ed Gein
I’m not a crazy woman who has an obsession for Hitler or the Holocaust.
I take a broad interest in murderers, not necessarily Justifying their crimes, but just the psychology behind them.
They’re actually extremely intelligent people.
Charles Manson is actually my personal favorite.
But back to Hitler, had he not lost his sanity, I think he would have been an even more powerful leader.
He was basically a military expert & an exceptional public speaker, not to mention that he actually did have some good ideas [which is probably the most important part of being a leader].
I am actually very good with English. Like seriously, English & Art are the two main things that I absolutely excel at. :]
& I don’t have kids, but I hope to in the future, but trust me, I would NEVER buy them that piece of shit. Although i would definitely buy them a full collection of Marilyn Manson & Ozzy Osbourne [including all Black Sabbath] album collections. :D
Which you would probably disagree with.
But thanks for the laugh.
I believe the first war’s huge imposed reparations (as well as the coercion thereto by way of naval blockades of sea lanes into Germany by both the British and French and the resulting famine of the populace during an already agreed upon armistice) upon Germany had a lot to do with the prerequisites of the the second war’s inception. Such things are not forgotten lightly and are seldom forgiven within living memory.
I still contend that the reparations were the main cause for misery in Germany in the interbellic period and perhaps the main cause of the second war (and the monstruous communist expansion thereafter) as far as its theatre in Europe and the Soviets are concerned.
- Morandi - Amore
That whoosh sound you hear is the previous posts, and all of history going right over your head.
Yeah, Hitler’s rule worked out really well for Germany. Millions starving, millions dying. 1941-1945 had quite the urban renewal project for Berlin, that rubble was a feature, not a defect. And the ensuing decades of Communist rule over the eastern portion were just ducky.
Uh.
Yeah.
What is it with you crazy women and Hitler/the Holocaust?
Women like a strong man on horseback, and Hitler was certainly that. (That’s a metaphor, in case you are as clueless on language as you are on history).
Yeah. Well, I think we can blame attendees of the Wannsee Conference, senior leaders in the Nazi hierarchy, KZ commanders, and a good many more.
The way you women seek to shift blame, and come out, like “Princess1989″ with relativist excuses for genocide is just creepy.
I bet you’d buy this toy for your kids:
http://users.erols.com/kennrice/lego-kz3.jpg [safe for work, but creepy].
-wolfe
women and history dont mix
You are a stupid cunt who’s idiocy is only rivaled by your historical revisionism.