Women Would Vote for Hitler
A woman voting on anything other than American Idol or her personal favorite type of chocolate is like watching a small child run full speed into a wall. Clearly the fundamentals are understood. The child runs, it’s going somewhere and there’s no doubt about that. The child can run. But very quickly one comes to the understanding that somewhere, somehow, the process has been perverted. Then comes the wall. Then comes the crying.
Women would vote for Hitler. Not because a woman could be talked into buying a catsup Popsicle while she was wearing white gloves, but because women are all fascists.
Don’t believe me? Let’s leave the constant threat of castration out of it for the moment. That makes it a slam dunk in my book, but that’s fine. Women are just “joking” whenever they play fascism card #1.
How about oppressive dictatorship by force or threat of violence?
Anyone who’s married will tell you a lot of things. The first of which will be, “Don’t get fucking married for any reason you dumb shit.” But a likely secondary is that marriage is not a democracy. What is it then?
Marriage is a fascist dictatorship of oppression — and so is any relationship with a woman. Work, professional, “professional”; they’re all the same. If you don’t like the flavor of the Kool-Aid and you want to add some mix, prepare to have a wailing siren of bullshit go off in your ear. That’s assault and that’s oppression. That’s enforcing your opinion through the threat of violence. If you press the issue, prepare to receive the threat of withheld friendship — or even sex whether it’s applicable or not! There was another man who pulled the same kind of shit. Yep, Hitler.
The biggest women/fascism link is a woman’s reliance on violence. Women will be the first to hit during any kind of dispute. It’s not even a percentage. It’s as much of a guarantee as it is that the sun will rise tomorrow. And as men we can all understand that the sun rises because it’s actually a star that our planet rotates around, therefore it is guaranteed to rise. We are able to remove ourselves from our personal point of view and understand that the sun isn’t rising at all. It’s actually us who are spinning around the sun. Women don’t even fucking know that.
Every morning when a woman wakes up at the crack of 10:30 she’s thrilled to shit to see that the sun’s in the sky again and her fake orange tan will look just as radiant as it did yesterday. That’s one of the biggest reasons why women shouldn’t vote. They don’t know fucking anything about anything. They know nothing.
But that’s not why women would vote for Hitler if given the chance. Say what you want about the merits of an individual ethos of governments as you will. You’re all men and therefore deserve the right to express opinion unmitigated by slander or censure. What I’m saying is that by an intrinsic party affiliation — fascist — all women would check the box marked ‘Kill Or Savagely Beat Anyone Who Doesn’t Agree With Me’. That fact has always held women back more than any mythical glass ceiling.
Related Articles:
March 23rd, 2008 at 12:26 pm - IP Man-Hash: 822c948329db7
Rather than buy a gun, i think I’ll just stick with not being a plumber.
How do you think you can stay alert and have a gun easily accessible when you have your head under a sink and a wrench in one hand and a pipe in the other?
Plus, I am English, we don’t do guns.
I wouldn’t risk my safety, same goes for jobs like cab driving. Cab drivers are victims to assault often, they always have their back to the assailant and have to drive wherever they are told to. I once discussed this with a cab driver, he said he would hate to imagine his wife doing the job he does.
Some jobs I just do not feel I am physically able to look after my self enough to be in control of any possible situation.
March 23rd, 2008 at 1:04 pm - IP Man-Hash: 9cfdf00b83713
Yeah thats true you cant aim with your head under a sink.
I forgot you were english. Does it ever bother you that you dont have the right to own a gun? Because it seems like those laws prevent decent people from defending themselves while criminals can easily get illegal guns.
I am very passionate about the right to own a gun, and interestingly enough, we americans, as stated in the constitution, have the right to bear arms to protect ourselves against our own government.
I come from a hunting state where everyone has a gun and i feel safer because of it. There is less crime because of it as well.
In a way i wish no one in the whole world had guns because they are used to harm other people, but in reality, criminals have guns, so i think everyone should be allowed to have one to protect themselves.
March 23rd, 2008 at 1:07 pm - IP Man-Hash: c6f24310788d2
I never said it was Orwell’s opinion. There are plenty of literary works which have an analysis not blessed by the author, many of these are considered scholarly. You may see Julia as Winston’s only glimpse of freedom, but I see her more as a reminder. She shows us, that under feminism, neither men (Winston) or women (Julia) will be happy in the end. Feminism just left them both begging (and yet not wanting to die) for death, due to an uninspired existence. You might also note that Orwell (Eric Blair) was not a Marxist socialist at all, rather a libertarian socialist. There is a difference.
Neither would I, nor have I. However, that’s not to say I’ve never been cheated on.
Sorry, but when most of my friends have been left by their wives, and I see what a mess has been made of their lives, I’m still not biting. Just because you deem yourself a moral person, does not mean the majority of women share the same moral compass. Further, the sharp increase in divorces initiated by women has only gotten worse since more misandric laws have been passed. This should tell you that there is an economic incentive for a woman to divorce. Here’s yet another reason I won’t get married, or have relations for that matter.
Rape is a despicable crime. In my opinion, if it can be shown conclusively that someone is guilty of rape, they should be sentenced to death. However, with the way that the laws are written, marital rape is just another way to get rid of your husband. All a woman has to do is lure her husband into having sex with her, and post coitus run to the emergency room. All the proof she needs is now swimming around inside her. No jury in the world would fail to convict a man in this position. And this isn’t even half of the nightmare that can be in store for a man, should he choose to marry. About the only safe way a man can have sex anymore is with his right hand, or if he gets his partner to sign a release in triplicate.
You say that you disagree with the current divorce laws, but women like you just sit there and let things happen, while misandric feminists declare jihad on all that is male.
March 23rd, 2008 at 1:55 pm - IP Man-Hash: 822c948329db7
I am not doing anything to change any laws, ones that favor men or women, past signing petitions on the government’s website. Even then, as an British Citizen I have absolutely no say on American policy.
I think that we are coming at the issue from two points of view, you say you have been cheated on and this is understandable to why you would talk in terms of laws as being so extremely significant in your decision when it comes to marriage as the only other alternative really is trust.
However, the women who describe as unappealing to you, even as you yourself claim to be “the majority of women”, if this is the case, look for women in the minority, a man need only have one wife if he chooses. The minority are therefore more than enough for one man to choose from.
I understand that Orwell had a very complex and conflicted sense of socialist identity, being that in theory it is perfect and in practice someone always seems to be corrupting it. I can see this as a viable reading of feminism I suppose, as there is always some bad ones in every bunch who just want to fuck it up for the rest of us. I don’t entirely agree with the idea of attributing ideas to a novel not endorsed by the author though, it goes back to Roland Barthes’ essay about whether the power of over a text is held by the reader or the author, I think it is both but ultimately I think that it is the author’s.
March 23rd, 2008 at 2:11 pm - IP Man-Hash: c6f24310788d2
There’s a name for women who are in the minority: taken. You are correct in asserting that moral women do exist, but there is a very good reason these women do not stay single for very long.
March 23rd, 2008 at 2:25 pm - IP Man-Hash: 822c948329db7
Well essentially it is just a case of optimism.
For every good guy disillusioned with women there is a good woman disillusioned with guys.
I personally always preferred to remain single unless an especially good guy came a long and it has always worked for me, and historically the world has always been populated by more women then men, so really it should be easier for a guy.
They just might have to sift through a lot of crap before they find the gold though.
March 23rd, 2008 at 2:42 pm - IP Man-Hash: 71a77d86f4c0d
My god that is the truth. YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
March 23rd, 2008 at 2:49 pm - IP Man-Hash: 9cfdf00b83713
Bohemian Grove is some wierd fucked up shit. And these people run the show.
March 23rd, 2008 at 2:50 pm - IP Man-Hash: 9cfdf00b83713
Bohemian Grove is some wierd fucked up shit. And these people run the show. and all of them are men.
March 23rd, 2008 at 2:54 pm - IP Man-Hash: 822c948329db7
I refer you to the same post I replied to this one with.
March 23rd, 2008 at 2:57 pm - IP Man-Hash: 71a77d86f4c0d
I read it. More mind-numbing politically correct foder from the woman across the pond, Ms. Jay Davies ===see, humor.
March 23rd, 2008 at 3:02 pm - IP Man-Hash: 822c948329db7
Bitch about it being politically correct, again i refer to the bit that says it has worked for me.
If you are going to be so pessimistic then you can’t expect any of these moral women to want to be with you. You acknowledge they are hard to come by and yet you bitch at the idea of them.
What do you think moral women are if not idealists? If they thought the world was as bleak, as dog eat dog, as you suggest then they would find little space for their morals to slot into their bleak world view.
March 23rd, 2008 at 3:09 pm - IP Man-Hash: 71a77d86f4c0d
You know, you sound like Oprah, who said the truth is what feel good and right (with thanks to Bernard Chapin). That’s utter bull shit: Im sorry, the truth is the truth. I’m not going to change truths to be more compelling to women. I’m not go say what they want to hear just to make them happy so that I receive their love. If its an ugly reality, I may not speak it to avoid confrontation, but I’m not going to say its something that is a distortion of the truth, as a PC female way want–no more extortion from women to distort the facts. Fuck that shit.
March 23rd, 2008 at 4:12 pm - IP Man-Hash: 822c948329db7
It is not a distortion of truth, methinks you don’t understand the definitions of pessimism and optimism.
There are moral women out there in the world, of this we have no doubt, you believe you really don’t have a chance, you really believe that, this is a token example of pessimism. You see it for truth but it is pessimism.I believe that if you think you will find a good person you will find a good person, that is optimism, i treat it as truth but it is optimism.
Numerous studies have shown that an optimistic mind is better for your health and your luck.
It is not about distorting the facts, there is a decent chance either will happen, either you will find a moral woman or you won’t, it is about which one you choose to believe.
You act like all the moral women are taken, but who gets the moral women? Moral men. Women who have high morals look for high morals in their partner. If your not a nice guy they are not interested. “Fuck that shit” rarely frequents the gentleman’s vocabulary.
You dismiss it as pc bullshit, but psychological studies have clearly suggested people make their own chances and make their own luck.
If you want to be a pessimist it is only yourself you are going to let down.
I am moral and an optimist and I have a moral and optimistic partner. It’s not impossible.
March 23rd, 2008 at 4:31 pm - IP Man-Hash: d653cff06dec4
Our hopes and expectations are black holes and revelations.
March 23rd, 2008 at 4:34 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5a5710be66918
Thank you for your response. In my opinion, we are both right. I am right that your views are consistent with politically correct equity-feminist dogma. You are correct with the value of optimism, and I feel you are right in that happy women are not attracted to pessimistic men. However, finding a virtuous woman who is still sexually attractive has come down to an extremely frustrating and depressing numbers game with little chance of success. I think one of the things that drives single men nuts is that we have to make effort to ask girls out, and, after TONS of rejection, we may find that one virtuous women. Men have to do most of the labor and with such small chances of success, its not worth it anymore. Women are optimistic and say “that one is out there waiting for you” but its just to much effort to find her. You say there are a lot more single women than men and that is true. But for me and many other men american single women are unappealing. A lot have gotten what they lot out of life (if she is divorced, she has her children) but have become grossly overweight, nagging, demanding viragos. The ones that are reasonable have a zillion guys after them. Not good odds.
Might as well run the blockade and chat it up with an oriental.
March 23rd, 2008 at 4:54 pm - IP Man-Hash: 04adeba9bbe86
You know, I have to admit its quite fun being berated by a Brit for poor manners. I think my back straightened up when I read your email.
March 23rd, 2008 at 5:27 pm - IP Man-Hash: c6f24310788d2
Not a bad idea, right up until another westernized PC [read fascist] empowerment princess gets her claws into your newfound love. Once they start talking, you can kiss any thoughts of marriage goodbye.
March 23rd, 2008 at 6:06 pm - IP Man-Hash: c6f24310788d2
Bleak world view? Last time I checked westernized governments weren’t trying to legislate women out of existence. Being male in our society is seen as a pathologic condition. Seventy-five percent of kids diagnosed with ADHD are boys. It’s not that these kids have a problem, it’s that schools are being run by women who have no idea how to address the social needs of boys. Rather than give them what they need, these boys are simply being drugged. We can all thank Carol Gilligan for leading the assault on defenseless young boys.
If I could go to work without the fear that I’ll be accused of sexual harassment, go on a date without the fear that I’d be accused of rape, or even just go out to a public park and not have mothers try to accuse me of being some kind of child molester just because I’m male then I wouldn’t have such a bleak view of the world. You pretend to empathize, but you don’t really give a fuck! Me being pessimistic or optimistic isn’t going to change the laws or how society treats men as second class citizens.
March 23rd, 2008 at 8:21 pm - IP Man-Hash: 9cfdf00b83713
Why? What could she possibly say to this “newfound love” to change her as a person?
That’s bullshit. Any *asian* woman (the term oriental refers to an object such as a carpet, not a person) would do anything to marry a westerner because they’re assured financial support and maybe even a ticket to america. Nothing anyone could say could change the fact that she has an opportunity to escape poverty if she just marries you. Alot of western men like that, because they can do whatever they want to the girls and never hear a complaint, but it doesn’t seem like you are like that.
If you find love somewhere abroad, thats fine. But don’t mistakenly think that a more subservient woman is that way because shes just so damn sweet. She wants your money, and to her, you’re status as a westerner makes you marraige gold.
After my parents divorced, my dad dated a thai woman who was very nice, but after a week she wanted to marry him to get citizenship. Needless to say, her suitcase was on the porch within a few hours. I felt bad for her, but when i talked to him about it i realized exactly why he had to do what he did. Thats not love, thats using your body as a bartering chip.
The best chance at love is with a person who doesn’t need you to help them escape from povery. With a person who loves you for who you are, not what you can give them.